ML20039E381

From kanterella
Revision as of 17:03, 14 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Wi Environ Decade 811119 Notice of Appeal from ASLB Decision Directed to Full Commission Not Aslab.Time Consumed by Addl Layer of Appeal Would Moot Any Effective Relief.Requests Commission Take Jurisdiction
ML20039E381
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/28/1981
From: Falk K
WISCONSIN'S ENVIRONMENTAL DECADE
To: Palladino N
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20039E370 List:
References
NUDOCS 8201070218
Download: ML20039E381 (1)


Text

./

BOARD oF DIRECTOR $ -- --

. ..... STAFF Neoas Seaf. Ra:Feie Lsse ~~ * ~P'rkf_ hhn Neess, oescica c***E"50'd *, Kurt Lwe$e Peter Anderson, opic.ca es . tag usues Peter Awson Dr W Na Smer Ea1 pao,Ec s cocaoraton Pref. George Beckee pg % W.ISCOnSin,S Environmental Decade w m .mc.',cx.,,,

%m Ceh Dout Neson ]l.1 North Carrou Street. Sute 208 '81 DEC" 3%M PMS =*c~ "*5 c* -c-Kaneen M. Fak Rcard Presned '** " C" Vntent Horess Madison, Wrsconsn 53703 ' "C

Thomas Van Alyea Hathaway Hasfer Fe.A%AL MMgACM W LNT Dr. Vctona Watson (608) 251 7020 .. . oore:: y Lagerrocs. sco suturenoitoa

.kdth LocsaY Anne Werterg Crgi

. , .. .,(,0Caer.ne Morterison. Cf rCI Muacen uo.

, .; p Potter, roaaro4 om assccArt December 28, 1981 Hon. Nunzio Palladino .. . . . . . . . . .

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission _ . . .,

" ~ " - ". - '

[N-g4&j Washington, D. C. 20555 x : em % /

Dear Mr. Palladino:

By filing dated November 19, 1981, we appealed to the full C n. mission f rom an initial decision of th'e Atomic Safety and Licensing Board in Dockets 50-266 and 50 -301, relating to the Licensee's proposed " sleeving" program at the Point Beach Nuclear Plant.

By Notice dated December 1,1981, we were informed that an Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel had been formed to hear this appeal.

It is our understanding that the appeal is to t$e full Commission, not to an Appeals Panel. Moreover, there is a pcessing time element in this case which would make the time c.nsumed by an additional layer of appeal moot any effective relief.

Specifically, the Licensee has apparently returned Unit 1 to service and is now operating in a manner which the appeal contends is unsafe.

Therefore, this is to respectfully request that the Commission return the appeal .to its jurisdiction f rom the Appeal Panel.

Sincerely, WISCONSIN'S ENVIRONMENTAL DECADE, INC.

8Y Mom h $ruS/

KATHLEEN M. FALK Director of Legal Affairs KMF/cm-P:50266NRC.L13 cc: Peter B. Bloch Hugh C. Paxton -

Jerry R. Kline Thomas S. Moore [

W. Reed Johnson 0[g1o74Doh8f0 2 5

~'-

Reginald L. Gotchy *

~'

Bruce Churchill Pg

~

Richard Bachmann Docketing and Service

., .,cycao ,m.

, - - .- . -.