ML20028H364
| ML20028H364 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 11/30/1990 |
| From: | OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20028H363 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9101020103 | |
| Download: ML20028H364 (139) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:- - - -
~m.~.a n__r_.w_m 5
FORT cal _HOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS NOVEMBER 1990 f $ -T-ni4}ABRliniu.. pit
<r- -**EE,'S-{2E'-52?EME!EmoummenEmmen .. _
~
zw 11W A 4 Ji -- P ' Prepared by: Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group I [$$0S0$00$@$$
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PREPARED BY: PRODUCTION ENGINEERING DIVISION SYSTEM ENGINEERING-NOVEMBER 1990
A - 4 .4- *1._ sib .e -. 4 -A__ __ a,M.. - 4Ac. a- p & _ &-% $ alas e % 4 4-M,' , l
.e 1
. 4 O l
' ib WU 647b OJnb s&Y l . . .
a a e p , - a , w _ w... a s a a,~, 4 ap...a a anung. n ,a agu w l- a w , , w . at a i Onster-dutuhd, nst & & of exhivnal . i pr264U/tn, $ k s w v O U P n, s f w < vtl $v ~ u r$1 s u>e. wtr asta % pa wnd sali4lactiseu nd - y ta , & ayu twas 4 m , a jaa sw s ong u apa tu,. 9 - 9. s e _
, - . . - - , - - - . - . ~ - - - . ~ . ~ . = . . - . . - . . . . ~ . _ . - . _ .
4 y
- 1. ;
TABLE OF CONTENTS W 7
. Distribution. . . . . . . . . . . -. . . . . . . . .
IV Preface-.-. . . . . . . . . . . .-. .-. . . . . . . 1 R-- Purpose . . . . . . .-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Scope .-. . . . . . . . . .-. . . .-. . , . . . .
- 3' Adverse Trend Report. . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . 4 Indicators Needing Increased Management . . . . . . 5 Attention
-Index-to Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) ,
Indicators . .
..... ......'. .... 9 Index to. Performance Indicator Graphs . . . . . . . 13
; Performance Indicator Graphs. . . . . . . . . . . . Significant -Items of_ Interest <. . . . . . . . . . 105 Definitions . ..... . .- , . ... . . . . . . . . . 106 Basis for Establishing 1989 Performance-c Ind icator Goal s . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 Operating Cycles tand Refueling- Outage Dates . . . 127 L -Production and Operation. Records. , . . . .-. . . ,. 129 .
Data Source . . ...... .- . . ,,. . . ... . . . . ..130- ,
~
References. . . ...-._...-. .:. . . ... . . . . . . 134 4 HQIE: THE 1FORTt CALHOUN STATION- PERFORMANCE - INDICATORS REPORT PROGRAM IS-TAILORED T07-A00RESS'THE AREAS LWHICH ~. AREE MOST - MEANINGFUL TO THE PEOPLE s
- USING THE iREPORT. COMMENTS AND INPUTHARE ENC 0URAGED. PLEASE -REFER- a
' COMMENTS 'TO THE TEST AND ' PERFORMANCE GROUP. ;TO: INCREASE PERSONNEL:
AWARENESS'0F FORT-cal.HOUN-STATION'S' PERFORMANCE,-IT IS SUGGESTEDLTHAT YOU. DISTRIBUTE THIS.. REPORT THROUGHOUT-YOUR DEPARTMENT. . l l
4 DISTRIBUTION R. L. Andrews R. E. Gray W. L. Neal G. L. Anglehart it. J. Guinn ' J. B. Newhouse W. R. Bateman E. R. Gundal M. W. Nichols K. L.-Belek A. L. Gurtis C. W. Norris A. D. Bilau R. H. Guy J. T. O'Connor B. H. Blome R. M. Hawkins W. W. Orr C. N. Bloyd M. C. Hendrickson L. L. Parent J. P. Bobba R. R. Henning T. L. Patterson C. E. Boughter K. R. Henry R. L. Phelps M. A. Breuer J. B. Herman T. M. Reisdorff C. J. Brunnert G. J. Hill A. W. Richard M. W. Butt K. C. Holthaus D. G. Ried C. A. Carlson L. G. Huliska G. K. Samide J. W. Chase C.-J. Husk T. J. Sandene G. R. Chatfield R. L. Jaworski B. A. Schmidt , A. G. Christensen R. A. Johansen S. T. Schmitz A. L. Clark J. W. Johnson F. C. Scofield O. J. Clayton- W. C. Jones L. G. Sealock R. P. Clemens J. D. Kecy H. J. Sefick R. G. Conner J. D. Keppler' D. K. Sentel
-J. L. Connolley D. D. Kloock P. Sepcenko G. M. Cook J. C. Knight J. W. Shannon M. R. Core D. M. Kobunski R. W. Short S. R. Crites- G. J. Krause J. R. Shuck D. W. Dale L. J. Kripal- C. F. Simmons R. C. DeMeulmeester J. B. Kuhr E. L. Skaggs R. D. DeYoung L. T. Kusek J. L. Skiles-F. K. Smith D. C. Dietz L. E. Labs D. E.-Dirrim H. P. Lazar R. L. Sorenson K. S. Dowdy R. C. Learch K. E. Steele J. A. Drahota S. E. Lee W. Steele T. R. Dukarski R. E. Lewis- H. F. Sterba R. G. Eurich R. C.'Liebentritt R. K. Stultz
,- H. J. Faulhaber C. J. LindenL G. A. Teeple l 'M. A. Ferdig B. R. Livingston M. A. Tesar V. H. Frahm J. M. Lofshult -T.-G. Therkildsen F. F. Franco J. H. MacKinnon P..L. Thompson H. K. Fraser G. D. Mamoran J. W. Tills J. F. W. Friedrichsen J. W. Marcil - -D. R. Trausch S. K. Gambhir H. L. Harfice P. R. Turner J. K. Gasper D. J. Matthews J. M. Uhland W.'G. Gates J. M. Mattice- C. F. Vanecek M. 0. Gautier T. J. McIvor G. L. Van Osdel S. W. Gebers R. F. Mehaffey- J. M. Waszak-J.-M.'Glantz R. A. Miser W. O. Weber J. T.-Gleason K. J. Morris G. R. Williams L. V. Goldberg D. C. Mueller S. J. Willrett L D. C. Gorence ~ R. J. Mueller W. C. Woerner I-iv
PREFACE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT IMPROVEMENTS , One indicator has been added to the Performance Indicators Report. This indicator has been added to the Maintenance Section. The Diesel Generator Reliability (25 Demands) Indicator found on page 35 l has been added. This indicator shows the number of failures that were reported during the last 25 emergency generator demands for each emergency diesel generator. Also shown is a trigger value which correlates to the number of failures in which an emergency diesel i generator can ' have before it is defined as a problem emergency diesel ; generator. When a certain diesel has been defined as a problem emergency i diesel generator in accordance with NUMARC Initiative 5A, certain i actions must be taken. The actions that must be taken concerning a ' problem diesel generator are defined in the Definition Section. A Standing Order will be drafted in February 1991 to institutionalize and formally approve / adopt the required actions. This indicator follows the definition of NUMARC 87-00, Guidelines and Technical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Station Blackout at Light Water Raactors, Appendix 0 dated April 6, 1990. One indicator has been changed. This indicator is in the Refueling Outage Section. Ti e' Overall Pro.iect Status (1991 Refuelir:o Outaae) Indicator found on page 98 has been changed. In addition to the total number of outage
,rojects previously shown, this indicator now includes the number of projects in which their preliminary schedules have been submitted.
l l
l PURPOSE This program titled " Performance Indicators" is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant performance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The information is presented in a way that provides ready identification of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing and monitoring Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on safety and reliability. Some performance indicators show company goals or industry information. This information can be used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation. 2-
-n 4
SCOPE In order for the Performance Indicator Program-to _be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing this program:
-Select- the data which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.
Present the data in a straight forward graphical format using averaging and smoothing techniques. Include established corporate goals -and industry -j information for comparison. ; r LDevelop formal definitions for each performance parameter. This will ensure consistency in' future reports .and allow
-comparison-with industry averages where appropriate.
. Comments .and. input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful:to the people using the report.-
ADVERSE TREND REPORT The Adverse Trend Report explains the conditions under which certain indicators are showing adverse trends. An indicator that is defined as AN ADVERSL TREND IS ONE IN WHICH THE DATA REPRESENTED FOR THR_[[ CONSECUTIVE MONTHS IS SHOWING A DECLINE IN PERFORMANCE for that particular indicator. Indicators which show an apparent three month decline, but are ap_t considered an adverse trend, will display an explanation which defines the reason why an adverse trend does not exist. Forced Outaae Rate - Page 20 The forced outage rate for the fort Calhoun Station has been increasing since July of 1990. One forced outage occurred in the month of August 1990 and was due to seal problems encountered in reactor coolant pump RC-3A. Another forced outage occurred in September 1990 and continued into OctoWr 1990. This forced outage was due to design basis questions concerning containment cooling capabilities. A third forced catage occurred in the month of November 1990 and was due to an Instrument Air System line failure in the Turbine Building. Outstandina Enaineerin_a Assistance Reauests (EAR's) - Page 83 The number of open EAR's has increased from 59 at the end of May of 1990 to 139 at the end of November of 1990. The major reason for the increase in the number cf open EAR's is the result of discrepancies i between old procedures and the new procedures which are being upgraded by the Procedure Upgrade Project. 4
-INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION This section lists the indicators which show inadequacies as compared to the .0 PPD goal and- indicators which show inadequacies as compared to the industry upper quartile. The indicators will be compared to the industry upper quartil_e as relevant to that indicator.
Forced Outaae Rate - Page 20 The forced outage: rate for the month of November 1990 was reported as being higher than the Fort Calhoun goal of 2.4%. The rise in the forced outage - rate during the month of August was due to seal problems encountered in - reactor coolant pump. nC-3A. These- problems resulted in 172.6 forced outage hours. During the month of September and October the plant was shutdown due to design basis questions concerning containment coo _ ling capabilities. This forced outage resulted in 212.0 forced outage hours being -reported, in November another forced outage occurred due to an Instrument Air-System line failure in the-Turbine Building. Unolanned Safety System Actuations - (INPO Definition) - Page 22 -
- The Fort Calhoun. Station has experienced an unplanned safety system actuation' during 1990. This unplanned actuation was a start and load of DG due to an inadvertent trip of backup lockout relay 86/2BF5. The
-Fort Calhoun goal for unplanned safety system actuations during 1990 was set at zero actuations.
Gross Heat Rate - Page 24 The monthly gross- heat rate for . the months of Augu,t, _ September, October, .and November were reported as being..above _the Fort Calhoun monthly goal. These high monthly: gross - heat - ratc= wcre due to three forced - shutdowns of-- the _ plant whi.ch occurred during - August,- September, and November, s 4 The year. to date ' gross heat rate is = currently above the goal 'of_10,228
' BTU /KWH-. The gross heat rate values for' January and February were. high-due .to the fact that- the- first stage of the -high pressure. turbine _ was
. removed during the months of January and February. During May startup
' from the 1990. Refueling Outage caused the gross heat- rate to be high.
During July, August, September, October, and November various -derates, and three.. forced outages ' caused the gross heat . rate values for these months to-be higher than-the~ Fort Calhoun goal. Eauivalent Availability Factor - Page:25 The monthly EAF for November was below the goal of 93% due to the forced
. outage which occurred.during November involving an Instrument Air System'
-line failure. The year to date EAF is = currently below the year to date goal of 63.1% due to various power: fluctuations- which occurred during the month of June and due to forced outage hours which occurred during the months of August, September, October, and November.
. .-- - = - . ~ _ ~ - -- .__ - . .. .- .
t INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED-MANAGEMENT ATTENTION (CONTINUED) Fuel' Reliability Indicator (FRI) - Page 26 The FRI has been above the Fort- Calhoun goal of 1.0 nanocuries/ gram. The FRI value for November _ using the actual plant letdown rate was reported as 1.88 nanocuries/ gram. Corrective Maintenance Backloa Greater Than 3 Months Old (Non Outaae) - Page 37 The percentage of open corrective non-outage MW0's older than-3 months old is currently above:the industry quartile value of.45.8% due to_194 open HWO's that are older than 3 months old. Number of Out-of-Service Control Room In}truments - Page 41 The number of out-of-service control room instruments 'has been above the Fort Calhoun goal lof 71out-of-service control room . instruments and above the ~ industry upperfquartile value of 7 - out-of-service control room instruments since-November of 1989. Egreent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities - Page 45 (Electrical-Maintenancel_ The percent of completed Lmaintenance activities for ' Electrical Maintenance was reported below the Fort Calhoun goal of 80% for 2 of the 4 scheduled weeks which ended-in November-1990.
. Percent of-Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities - Page' 46.
1 Pressure Eauioment) The; percent' of completed maintenance activities for Pressure Equipment' 3 was reported below the Fort Calhoun goal lof 80% for 1 of the 4 scheduled weeks.which' ended in hovember 1990. Percent lof Comoleted Scheduled Maintenance Activities - Page 47 (General Maintenance) The Lpercent of completed maintenance activities for General- Maintenance-was reported below the Fort Calhotn goal 1of 80% - for- the 3 of the 4 scheduled weeks which ended in November 1990.
' Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance : Activities - Page 48 (Mechanical-Maintenance).
The percent lof completed maintenance activ.ities for Mechanical-Maintenance-was reported below the Fort-Calhoun goal of 80% for the 2 of-the 4 ~ scheduled weeks which ended in November 1990.
. ~ -~
INDICATORS NEED:NG INCREASED MANAGrMENT ATTENTION (CONTINVED) breent of Completed Scheduled Maintenan;2lti.lyiLin Page 49 ilnstrumentation & Control) The percent of completed maintenance activities for Instrumqntation & . Control was reported below the Fort Calhoun goal of 80% for 1 out of the 4 scheduled weeks which ended in October 1990. Check Valve failure Rate - Page 53 The Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate as of the end of August was above the industry check valve failure rate. The reason for the high check valve f ailure rate is that the plant is performing maintenance on check valves which have not been tested for failures before. The check valve f ailure rate is expected to decrease as the check valves are maintained and monitored through the Check Valve Program. Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index - Page 54 The CPI value for the Fort Calhoun Station has been above the industry upper quartile value of 0.24 since the first CPI value was taken after y startup in May of 1990. Part of the reason -for the high CPI values is the fact that the Fort Calhoun Station has been involved in various ! derates and forced outages since startup in May. Another reason for the high CPI values is the fact that the Fort Calhoun Station uses morpholine to control PH. The use of morpholine also raises the CPI values. Total Skin and Clothina Contaminations Page 60 The total number of skin and clothing contaminations has been above the Fort Calhoun goal of 150 contaminations since the month of April 1990. The total number of skin and clothing contaminations has been above the x industry upper quartilt value of 129 contaminations since the month of March 1990. The high number of skin and clothing contaminations during the months of March and April 1990 was due to increased activity in the Radiation Controlled Area (RCA) associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage. Decontaminated Auxiliary Buildina - Page 61 The square footage of the auxiliary building which is decontaminated is currently below the Fort Calhoun goal of 85% (non outage). This is due to activities which took place in the auxiliary building associated with , the forced outage which occurred during September and continued into October. The percentage of decontaminated auxiliary building is expected to increase after the painting of the auxiliary building is completed. The painting of the auxiliary building will ease the auxiliary building decontamination process. 7-l 1
s INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED
- i MANAGEMENT ATTENTION (CONT!NVED) lemocrary Modificatins (Excludina Scaffoldina) - Page 82 The number of temporary modifications which are installed in the plant is currently above the fort Calhoun goal of 15 temporary modifications.
I i 8
SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (SEP) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators pages is to list the indicators related to the SEP items with parameters that can be trtnded. 31E_Etference Humber 15. - Increase HPES and IR Accountability hgg Through Use of Performance Indicators Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance) . . . . . . . . 43 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 Recordable injury Cases Frequency Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LER's . . . . . . . . . . 87 CAR's issued versus Significant CAR's issued versus NRC Violations issued versus LER's Reported . . . . . . . . . . 10 4 SEP Reference Number ]& - Quality Audits and Surveillance Programs are . Evaluated, Improved in Depth ano Strengthened CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR's Issued versus NRC Violations issued versus LER's Reported . . . . . . . . . . 104 31P Reference Number 21 Develop and Conduct Safety System functional Inspections CAR's issued versus Significant CAR's issued versus NRC Violations issued versus LER's Reported . . . . . . . . . . 104 SEP Reference Number 24 - Complete Staff Studies S t a f fi ng Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 SEP Reference Number 26 Evaluate and Implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements Disabling injury Frequency Rate ................29 Recordable Injury Cases frequency Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 SEP Reference Number 31 - Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWO Overall Status (1991 Refueling Optage) . . . . . . . . . . . 96 Progress of 1991 Outage Modification Planning. . . . . . . . . . 97 Overall Project Status (1991 Refueling Outage. . . . . . . . . . 98
1 1
- SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (SEP)
PERFORMANCE-INDICATORS ; (CONTINUED) J SEP Reference Number 33 Develop On Line Maintenance and Hodification j Schedule i Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Electrical Maintenance) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . 45 Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Pressure Equipment) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (General Maintenance) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Percent of Consleted Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Mechanical Maintenance) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 , Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Instrumentation & Control). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 SEP Reference Number 36 Reduce Corrective-Non Outage Backlog Maintenance Work Order Backlog (CorrectiveNonOutageMaintenance) . . . . . . . . . . .-. . . 44 , SEP Reference Number 41 - Develop and Implement a Preventive Maintenance-Schedule Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . , . 39 Preventive Maintenance items Overdue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 SEP Reference Number 43 -_lmplement the Check Valve Test Program Check Valve f ailure Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 SEP Reference Number 44 Compliance With and Use of Procedures Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . . . . . . . . . 43 SEP Reference Number 46 - Design a Procedures Control and-Administrative Program Document Review. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 SEP Reference Number 52 Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological-Practices Radiological Work Practir.es Program. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 L
SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (SEP) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (CONTINUED) SEP Reference Number 54 Complete implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Volume of Low Level Solid Radioactive Waste. . . . . . . . . . . 28 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 Decontaminated Auxiliary Building. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 1[P Reference Number 58 - Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Program Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security) . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Security Incident Breakdown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 Security System failures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 SEP Reference Number 60 - Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 SEP Reference Number 61 Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SO SEP Reference Number 62 Establish Interim System Engineers Temporary Modifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR's) . . . . . . 83 Engineering Change Notice Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 Engineering Change Notice Breakdown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8S SEP Reference Number 68 - Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and Establish Means to Monitor Operator Training SRO License Examination Pass Ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 R0 License Examination Pass Ratio. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 License Candidate Exams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
SAFETY ENHANCEMENT FROGRAM (SEP) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (CONTINUED) SEP Reference Number 71 Improve Controls over Temporary Modifications Temporary Modifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 i
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS Forced Outage Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical. . . . . . . . 21 Unplanned Safety System Actuations - (INP0 Definition) . . . . . 22 Unplanned Safety System Actuations - (NRC Definition). . . . . . 23 Gross Heat Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Equivalent Availability Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Fuel Reliability Indicator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative). . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Volume of Low level Solid Radioactive Waste. . . . . . . . . . . 28 Disabling injury Frequency Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 l
- l. ..
0' PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
- INDEX TO GRAPHS ,
1 (CONTINUED) OPERATIONS Station Net Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Forced Outage Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 L Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical. . . . . . . . 21 Unplanned Safety System Actuations (INPO Definition) . . . . . . 22 Unplanned Safety System Actuations (NRC Definition). . . . . . . 23 Gross Heat Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
' Equivalent Availability Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Fuel Reliability Indicator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Daily Thermal Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours . . . . . . . . 31 Operations and Maintenance Budget. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Document Review.-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 MAINTENANCE Emergency Diesel Generator Unit Reliability. . . . . . . . . . . 34
[ F Diesel Generator Reliability-(25 Demands). . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 F Maintenance Work Order Breakdown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Corrective Maintenance Backlog >3 Months Old . . . . . . . . . -. 38 Ratio of- Preventive to Total Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 1'
-Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue ... . -, ... . . . . . . . 40 Number of Out of Service Control Room Instruments. . . . . . . . 41
~
Maintenance Overtime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance) . . . . . . . . 43 Maintenance = Work Order Backlog-(Corrective Non Outage) . . . . . 44 r 14-l \; - _-.. - - .-.. - . . .~.-.-..-.~.-.--.--.---__-.-:.--._
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED) l i MAINTENANCE (CONTINUED) Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities ! (Electrical Maintenance) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Pressure Equipment) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 i Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (General Maintenance). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Mechanical Maintenance) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Instrumeritation & Control) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 Number of Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 Number of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NP.qDS) Reportable Failures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 Maintenance Effectiveness. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 Check Valve Failure Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative). . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Volume of Low level Solid Radioactive Waste. . . . . . . . . . . 28 Secondary System Chemistry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit . . . . 55 Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits . . . . 56 In Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of. Service . . . . . . . . . . 57 Hazardous Waste Produced . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure. . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 Decontaminated Auxiliary Building. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 Radiological Work Practices Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
j PERFORMANCE !NDICATORS 1 INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINVED) CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION (CONTINUED) Number of Hot Spots. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 Gaseous Radioactive Waste Coing Discharged to the Environment. . 64 Liquid Radioactive Waste Being Disa harged to the Environment . . 65
- SECURITY l 9
Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security) . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Security Incident Breakdown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 Security System Failures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 i MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES
- Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 Spare Parts Inventory Value. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
- Spare Parts issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 Inventory Accuracy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 Stockout Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
- Warehouse Receipts . . . .r . . ..................74
. Warehouse Issues . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 Warehouse Returns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
. Material Requests Awaiting Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
. Expedited Purchases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 78 Invoi ce Breakdown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 Material Request Planning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 DESIGN ENGINEERING Outstanding Modifications. . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 Temporary Modifications. . . . -, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 l .- 1 16-l l-
- e c 4- Gw - Pe y r y-e*bec- e
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINVED) DESIGN ENGINEERING (CONTINUED) Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR's). . . . . . . 83 Engineering Change Notice Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 Engineering Change Notice Breakdown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 JNDUSIRIAL SAFETY Disabling Injury Frequency Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 l Recordable Injury Cases frequency Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 i HUMAN RESOURCES ! Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs. . . . . . . . . . . 87 Personnel Turnover Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 Sta f fi ng Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 TRAINING AND OUALIFICATION SR0 License Examination Pass Ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 R0 License Examination Pass Ratio. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 License Candidate Exams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 Ho tl i n e s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 Classroom (Instructor) Hours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 Total Hours of Student Training. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 REFUELING OUTAGE MWO Overall Status (1991 Refueling Outage) . . . . . . . . . . . 96 Progress of 1991 Outage Modification Planning. , , . . . . . . 97 Overall Project Status (1991 Refueling Outage) . . . . . . . . . 98 QUALITY ASSURANCE Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours . . . . . . . . . 99 Cumulative Violations and Non Cited Violations (NCV's) . . . . . 100 17-
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS . INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED) 00AllTY ASSURANCE (CONTINVED) , Percent of CAR's Greater Than Six Months Old . . . . . . . . . . 101 3 Overdue and Extended Corrective Action Reports . . . . . . . . . 102 Corrective Action Reperts Current Status . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 CAR's issued versus Significant CAR's issued versus. . . . . . . 104 NRC Violations !ssued versus LERs Reported
)
l
.- I 500000- R Station Net Generation 400000-M t .
9 a < W 300000-a t ~ t r H 200000-o
-u ,
r s 100000-
-o I l Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 STATION NET GENER/11QH This indicator shows--the net- generation of the Fort Calhoun Station i for the reporting month. ;
During the month -of November '1990, a net total of 312,725.0 MWH was generated by the Fort Calhoun Station. The net generation of the Fort Calhoun Station was low due to 60 3 -forced outage hours being ; reported. This forced outage was due to an instrument Air System line failure in the Turbine Building. The net generation for the month of August was . low due to-_ a forced outage which occurred during the month. This forced, outage was due to seal problems on- reactor coolant pump RC 3A. The net generation for the months of September and October were.also low due to a forced outage. The forced outage which occurred in September and continued into October-was d'2e to a design basis-question on containment cooling capabilities. The net generation totals for the months of March and April were zero and the net" generation total for-the month of May was low due.to the plant being shutdown for the 1990 Refueling Outage. Adverse Trend: None
.19
( '
- Forced Outage Rate G- Fort Calhoun Goal 103
-& Industry Upper 10 Percentile 8-GOOD 4
R 6-a t e 4- 1
\
I*4 ' 9.--- O --- G- ---O - -- G- ---G -- - O ----G - - G -- --G--- -O - -- O
& 2-2;{ -
gy ' O O $' 0
" " m O G G -G--G-G--G--O
'87 '88 '89 DIc Jan fib Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 FORCED OUTAGE RATE The forced outage rate was reported as 5.1% for the month of November 1990. The rise in the forced outage rate for the Fort Calhoun Station during the - month- of November was due to 60.3 forced outage hours being reported during November due to an Instrument Air System line failure in the_ Turbine Building.
The industry upper ten percentile value for the forced outage rate is O.25%. The 1990 goal for forced outage rate is 2.4% and is based on seven days of forced outage time. The basis for establishing the 1990 performance goals can be found on page 125. Adverse Trend: The forced outage rate has been rising since July 1990. This rise in the' forced outage was -due to three forced outages - -
-which occurred in August; September _ and continued into October; -and
' November. The first forced outage was due to _ seal problems encountered _in reactor coclant pump RC-3A, the second forced outage was due to design basis questions concerning containment cooling capabilities, .and the third forced outage was due to an Instrument Air System line failure in the Turbine Building.
20-
. _ ~ . _ . _ _ _ _ .__ . . __ _ _
1 5-L 4 Reactor Scram G- Fort Calhoun Goal
-e n Id us ry t Upper 10 Percentile 4-1 S
3- GOOD C r 4 a m
. 2-1 g 1- 0 ---s---e - e---- e. --- o -...o .. . - e .... e . ...o . . . .o . --o ll$
mi'
$$[ 0 0 0 0- # ~ - - - - - - - - - -
- '86 '87 '88 '89 DIc JTn fib Mir Air May Jun Jil Aig Sip Oit Niv 1989 1990 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC tEACTOR t SCRAMS WHILE CRITi(AL There were no unplanned . automatic reactor scrams in November. -It =ht s : been 1,612 days-since the last unplanned automatic reactor scram which occurred on July 2,1986. ,
-The 1990 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams while critical has been set at 1.
The industry upper ten percentile value is-zero scrams per unit on an annual basis. The Fort Calhoun - Station is ' currently in the
-upper ten percentile of nuclear plant
- performance-in this area..
Adverse Trend: None
- , 4, v w -ver , +,-,3.-,+v---,v o,, -e w- c -,,.vm-#- ...-..-r,me. _w-_,, .-,,w,.- _ ,-i.. - .-m_- ,-_ . + . - + - ~ . - - - , _ - - +
4- []SafetySystemActuations e- Fort Calhoun Goal 0 Industry Upper 10 Percentile 3-A C t l GOOD k 2- k o n s 1- Q ., s y
\ > ~.
;d
\ ,
; ,79:
0 0 0 \ "? O O O- -9 " O O O C O G O O--G- '87 '88 '89 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - flNPO DErlNITION) There were no unplanned safety system actuations auring the month of November 1990. The 1990 - goal for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is zero. This goal is based on past performance at the Fort Calhoun Station. The industry upper ten percentile value-for the number of unplanned safety system actuations per year is zero. Adverse Trend: None
[]SafetySystemActudtions(SSA's)
- 12 Month Running Total SSA's
--- Critical Hours 10- -
r1000 N 8- 800 N u ,., f.--, j,,,,-, , u m -
,/ \ l \ l \ ; ; - m b l \ / i ; i' -
b e
'y j' \a/
g, ! \ l
,gnn e r ! -
it r s ! \ > V
-m o -
\ l 0 f ,i \
l f I S 4' 't ,I -400 g g S I \ ! o A - l l u
* \
m l \ l r [ S 2- l - , l -200 8
) ! , :
l l
* ' ~
9 l ,
; i
$l 0
- 0. h- '\-i i >
c 0
'88 '89 J FMAMJJAS0NO JFMAMJJAS0NO 1989 1990 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (NRC DEFINITION)
This indicator shows the number of safety system actuations (SSA's) which include the High and Low Pressure Safety injection Systems, the Safety Injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classification of SSA's iceludes actuations when major equipment is operated and when the logw systets for these safety systems are challenged. I The last event of this type ocorred in November 1990 when Diesel Generator D 1 and Diesel Generator DG 2 experienced sympathy starts when the turbine was tripped due to a forced shutdown of the plant.
-This forced shutdown was due to an Instrument Air System line failure in the Turbine Building.
The majority of SSA's displayed above were related to 1990 Refueling Outage activities and are currently being reviewed under the Safety System Actuation Reduction Program. The goal of this Program is to ( reduce the number of SSA's at Fort Calhoun. Adverse Trend: None __.___..-_____.________.__._____m. i 13000-l l Monthly Gross Heat Rate 4
. - Year to Date Gross Heat Rate 1 G- Fort Calhoun Monthly Goal :
+ Fort Calhoun Year to Date Goal ;
12000-O Industry Upper 10 Percentile g T '
- U
/
K GOOD y 11000- *
> H 10520
** ~k- s =*= -
M , 10270IC :4 10000 D- - D- D-O- O 'O - - O - 0 - 0 -
.DG dif 10014]w y
y;Q T % e
.d 'ik, 4 h."k h"M l$[[d9000- " '
L '81 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul ' Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 ARO.5LHEAT RATE . The gross heat rate for the fort Calhoun Station was reported as 10,052 BTU /KWH during the month of November. This monthly gross heat rate was above the monthly gross heat rate _ goal of 10,000 TTU/KWH. The high monthly
-gross heat rate was due to a forced shutdown of the plant. Thu.
year-to-date gross - heat. rate was reported as 10,326 BTU /KWH. This year to date- value was higher than the year to date gross heat rate ' goal-
- of ~ 10,228 - BTU /KWH. . The year to date gross heat rate is - above the fort -
i Calhoun goal due to the fact that the first stage of the high aressure turbine was removed prior to the 1990 Refueling Outage. Additiona'ly the gross heat- rate values for the months-of May, June, and July 1990, were high.due - to startup after the .1990 Refueling Outage and various derates. _, The high gross heat rate values for September, October, and November were-due to- start ups after forced outages which occurred in these months. The-year to-date gross heat ' rate- value is expected- to decrease as the river water- temperature decreases. The above monthly and year to-date Fort Calhoun goals are the best gross heat' rate that can be achieved by the-Fort -Calhoun Station.- Currently the plant is above- the year to-date gross
- heat rate goal. If the station operates-at 100% for the rest of 1990, this
- goal will be approached but will not be - achieved. The gross heat rete industry upper ten percentile.value is 9,935 BTV/KWli.
l Adverse Trends: None-i i l l
R Monthly EAF
- Year to Date EAF n G- Fort Calhoun Monthly Goal
-+- Fort Calhoun Year to Date Goal GOOD
-O Industry Upper 10 Percentile 100-
,o. ..e .. e ...e . ..e....e O
77 80- D O-O-O--O ---f- G
\
-O - @-O- & -{
71 i / ,
~~i 66
\ 7--
gg m E p 60-
\i*
e p rh Di L ,,_ ,I i s > y t j :!S y40- i! N 'y l y@u w
\
N! j Ud i a
<J -
20- \, j I o a 3. 4 ; ,
% yx 4 -
\
i I 0 6 -O "-d'
'87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 IQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOB The EAF was reported as 88.1% for the month of November.
This EAF was lower than the. Fort Calhoun monthly goal of 93% due to forced outage hours being reported during lievember. This forced outage occurred due to an Instrument Air System line failure in the Turbine Building. The year .to-date EAF was reported as 57.6%. This
-year to-date value was lower than the year to date goal of 63.1%. -The low year-to-date EAF was due to various power fluctuations - which occurred during the month of June and the forced outage. hours being reported during the months of August, Septembst, October, and November.
The EAF industry upper ten percentile value is 82.5%. Adverse Trends: None
8 - Fuel Reliability Indicator G- Fort Calhoun Goal
-O Industry Upper 10 Percentile d- Industry Median 6-n a
1 n
-g' 6 o a u GOOD 2.4 [ 4- 4
,1Hi I
@ 'l 5 f' '
sgi r kd [j . m 2- , o a o a a o a a o g p4 jal . o.... e....e ...e .. o .. .o... .. . o . .. . ... e . ....e .. .c m ('D&e W ,t , y hk* 0 n--.n, .. n . .n .n n n .m. m. m- .o. .m
'88 '89 Dec Jan: Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 FUEL REllABillTY INDICATOR ;
The FRI was reported as 1.22 nanocuries/ gram for the month -of .iovember. This INP0 indicator uses an industry normalized letdown purification rate. The- FRI was also calculated using Fort Calhoun's . actual letdown purification rate. The FRI value using the plant's actual-letdown purification rate was reported as 1.88 nanocuries/ gram. - ;The 1990 fuel reliability goal has been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram. The fuel reliability indicator industry upper ten percentile value is 0.04 nanocuries/ gram. Adverse Trend:- None s E l l' L !~
Personnel Radiation Exposure 388 400- *e- Fort Calhoun Goal
]u, O Industry Upper 10 Percentile a '
4 GOOD
" 300-6 272 4 49:u. V; .
- g. .. . e.. 7 9 ..- O -- & ~~~ 0 -~ O
n.rJ-R - E 200- r a - Ea H
,, D- DJ--O V D ---G--O -0 -E --D- D - O -O l
Ih {4 h 93.4
.,, 100- j ne o g ,
, + ,
4: N4 MMd 3ln 3 ,'s (@ ' ,
'87 '88 f89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ,
1990 i
?
PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE) During November 1990, 2,7 man rem was recorded by TLD's worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station. The monthly- cumulative exposure goal -for November was- 281.1 man-rem while the actual cumulative exposure through _ November totaled 259.1- man-rem. The exposure cumulated in-- 1990 has been high due to the increased activity in the Radiation Controlled Area (RCA) associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage. The personnel radiation exposure industry upper ten percentile is 166 man-rem per unit per year. Adverse Treno: None SEP 54
O Monthly Radioactive Waste Shipped 12500 - Cumulative Radioactive Waste Shipped G- Fort Calhoun Goal
-O- Industry Upper 10 Percentile 10000-C u
y GOOD c 7500- 4 6195 F e e 4454 t 5000- o---- e --- e --- e --- e -- - e----o --- e- -- o --- s- --- o --- o 3e 7 yh A O - O----G -O -O --D - O-D - O-0-0-0 ed L 2500-1722 M
'87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 VOLUME OF LOW. LEVEL SOLID RADIDACTIVE WASTE The above graph shows the amount of low level radioactive waste shipped off-site for disposal. The table below lists the amount of waste actually shipped off site for disposal and the amount of ~
low-level radioactive waste which is in temporary storage. The volume of solid radioactive waste is (cubic feet): Amount Shipped in November - 0.0 Amount in Temporary Storage- - 1141.1 1990 Cumulative Amount Shipped - 1726.7 1990 Goal - 5000.0
.The. industry upper ten percentile value is 3,072 cubic feet per unit per year.
The Fort Calhoun Station was in the respective upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986, 1987 and 1988. Adverse Trend: None SEP 54
, ~ . . . . - _ - . ,
, ,_ ,._._.___m-., . - , , , _ . _ . . . _ . _ . . _ - . . . _ , - , . _ . , , , . . - - . , . ,
1 e 2- w 1990 Disabling Injury frequency Rate
+:- 1989 Disabling injury Frequency Rate 1.75- -L.- 5 Year Average Disabling injury frequency Rate e- fort Calhoun Goal
).. O Industry Upper 10 Percentile 1.25-R a GOOD 1
t , 4 e -
.75-
[~
.5-N ,/ \ N s N
~'
'h 0 - - - - - - ,9 - - - - -G - - -- -O 0 N 2 ~0% ---- O
& ~ ~ ~ ~ ~& ~ ~
5 , D Fq :5: p. --6 0 -E 1$ 3 -n A M " a- -C Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec DISABLWG INJURY FREQllfNCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE) This indicator shows the current monthly disabling injury rate in ; column form. The 1989 disabling injury frequency rate and the Fort Calhoun Station 5 year average disabling injury frequency rate are also shown. There were zero risabling injuries reported at the fort Calhoun Station in November. The total number of disabling injuries in 1990 is one. The 1990 disabling injury frequency rate goal was set at 0.31% and was based on one disabling injury occurring in 1990. The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury frequency rate is 0% . . , The year end disabling injury frequency rates for 1987, 1988, and 1989 were 0.6, 1.6, and 0.4 respectively. 6,dverse Trend: None SEP 26 29-
^
* - Thermal Output
]
- -- Technical Specification Limit
' l
-e Fort Calhoun Goal 1500 m m
;;m o v v -
m v m o m o 1200-(
~
M ; e g 900-a + y .
- a 4 t 600-t '>
s - 300-i 0 . , , , . . , , , . 28 November 1990 dally THERMAL OUTPUT The above thermal output graph displays the daily operating power l evel , the 1500 thermal megawatt average technical specification limit, and the 1495 thermal megawatt fort Calhoun goal. The cross
- hatched area represents the difference between the maximum allowable operation and the actual plant operation.
The percent power operation of the Fort Calhoun Station during November 1,1990 through _ November 19, 1990 was approximately 100%. The plant was then shutdown between November 19, 1990 and November 22, 1990 due to a forced outage. The plant then increased power to approximately 100% for the rest of the month of November 1990. It must be noted that. normal update oscillations on test point XC105 prevent Operations from continually operating the plant above 1495 thermal megawatts. Because of these oscillations, power is sometimes backed down to decrease the risk of violating the 1500 thermal megawatt technical specification limit. Adverse Trend: None
-30
._ ,~._ - , - - -
I 2-
- Equipment Forced Outage Rate 1.8-1.6-1.4-1.2 GOOD R
a 4' 3 t .
- j. .8-
.6-
.4 .
.13 . .
5 g .2- . 0 0 - 0
'87~ '88 '89' Jan Fe'b Mar Apr May sun Ju'l Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ,
1990 E0VIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS There were 60.3 equilment forced outage hours reportec during the month- of November 1990. These forced outage hours were reported due to an Instrument Air System line failure in' the Turbine Building. The last equipment forced outage ; occurred in August of 1990 and was due to seal problems on g' reactor coolant pump RC-3A. Adverse Trend: None ; 1
- Actual Operations Expenditures 5-
- - Operations Budget gy100-1 1d 75- -
-X lo 50-
'r 0
y/- - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec . 1990 403
- Actual Maintenance Expenditures
"" "*"#" "9 M 30-i 3 ) 20 p
o1 na s r 10-
/a[
0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year to date as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station. The budget year-to-date for Operations was 72.4 million dollars for November while the actual cumulative expenditures through November totaled l 64.2 million dollars. : The budget year-to date for Maintenance was 23.8 million dollars for-November while -the actual cumulative expenditures through November totaled 16.2 million dollars. Although Operations and Maintenance are currently 15.8 million dollars under budget, a- cost- variances study from January through October 1990, predicts that Operations and Maintenance will be approximately 13 million dollars under budget at year end 1990. This is primarily due to reductions, delays, and-cancellations of services. Adverse Trends: None r a6 e w-v--> cw---'---w-ne ne = -wwwm ees-rw----er+ w. v + w s -- -r r = w v e + >=w.*2--
1
~
- 1500- .+- Documents Scheduled for Review
-x Documents Reviewed
. : Overdue Documents X l 1200- ! h ND i l*900- l\ j \ b u. j \ l 1 em - l \ re l \ . n 600 j \. ! \ ot j g ., ; fs l \ r ,', l \ i i l \' l \ 300- / i \
/s l' '\ l/ \
gbx.'N -I ,x. N---a s, i * ~~ ~
-yp, . :-
g , +; . Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 DOCUMENT REVIEW This-indicator shows the number of biennial reviews completed during the reporting month, the number of biennial. reviews scheduled for the
-reporting month, and the number of biennial reviews that are overdue.
Tnese document reviews are performed in-house and include Special Procedures, the Site Security. Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual. During November thEre 'were 184 document reviews completed- while 34 document reviews were scheduled At the end of November, there were 63 document reviews overdue, The overdue document reviews at the end of November consisted primarily of Operations' documents. During the month of November there were 43 :new or renamed documents- ! reviewed. These new or renamed documents will need to be reviewed again in 1992. The ~ high number of documents scheduled -for review for the month' of June 1990 was due to the high number of document reviews that were completed during the month of June 1988. The reviews that were completed during June 1988 were due to be reviewed in June-1990. Adverse Trend: None -SEP 46 _.w - e,r e _ >- ~ m v e r :r- s, N, m - . N eh---r m w am -- w % ~ "w e-v'N==-
4 End of Month Trigger Values For: l Ifailures/20 Demands - 20 Demands 10 f"ll failures /50 Demands 50 Demands
% Failures /100 Demands -
100 Demands 8- - -- - - -- - - --- - ~ - N y GOOD a m 6- Y b
'r u) r 4 o
S g . -. - . . . . . . . . . . . - . - - . . - . - . _ . . . . -. 2-0- -* Aug Sep C:t Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1990 1991 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY This bar graph shows three monthly indicators pertaining to the number of failures that were reported during the last 20, 50, and 100 emergency diesel generator demands at. the Fort Calhoun Station. Also shown are trigger values which correspond to a high level of confidence that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a reliability of greater than or equal to 96% when the failure i values are below the corresponding trigger values, i l The demands counted for this indicator include the respective number of starts Aqd the respective number of load runs for both Diesel Generators combined. The number of start demands include All valid and inadve it starts, including all start-only demands and all start demands that are . aed by load-run demands, whether by automatic or manual initiation. Loaw run demands nst follow successful starts and meet at least one of the following; a load-run that is a result of a real load signal; a load run test expected to carry the plant's load and duration as stated in the test specifications; special tests in which a diesel generator was expected to be operated for a minimum of one hour and to be loaded with at least 50% of design load (see exceptions and other demand l criteria in the Definition Section). The last 2 demand failures occurred in the month of June 1990 and were due to problems with DG-l's static exciter voltage regulator. Adverse Trend: None i
R DG 1 Failures /25 Demands 5- @j DG 2 Failures /25 Demands
- Failure Trigger Value for 25 Demands 4-h
^
Np u a m 3-b) e ' u Y r
. 2- -
O s f . 1-0 - Nov Dec- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1990 1991 DIESEL GENERATOR REllABILITY (25 DEMANDS 1 The Diesel Generator Reliability (25 Demands) Indicator has been added to the Performance Indicators Report. This indicator shows the number of failures experienced by each emergency diesel generator during the last- 25 start demands and ~2b load-run-demands. A trigger value of 4 failures within the last 25 demands is also shown. It must be emphasized that in accordance with NUMARC criteria, certain actions - will take place in the event : that any --one diesel - generator - experiences 4 or.more failu r 't hin the last 25 demands on the unit. ' These actfons are - describec he Definition Section. A Standing Order will be drafted for the rurt Calhoun-Station to institutionalize ,- a nd formally approve / adopt the required NUMARC actions. Diesel Generator DG-1 has exper.ienced 2 failures within its last 25
-demands.
Diesel Generator DG-2 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 demands on the unit. Adverse Trend: =None
\
400- - 94 September 1990
~
October 1990 0 u I INovember 1990 300-s t a , n d 1 200-n 9 e g M g i
'Q'*{*
0 100- ' l5$ Hjj S
- BN a z=u l =a = m- m
," ?! 2% lMi 55 3*=* 3 B-
'U .WM5 :
mi EM i 55! Mi 0 -- 0-3 36 69 9-12 >12 Age in Months AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON 0UTAGE) This indicator _shows the age of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders (MWO's) remaining open at the end of the reporting month. Adverse Trend: None ! l E September 1990 IA October 1990 400 l l November 1990 _: _m .
===
300- [ih IM 200- h alt 3 j +m
~
?1 1
$~ ,..
100- gg {g g-53! Mii it Mj ! 4q;;
=== 4a# . y erg aN 7es
~~
I 0 a Total Open Total Open Open Open MW0s Oper, Safety High MW0s > 3 Months Safety Related Priority 01d Re1ated MW0s MW0s MW0s > 3 Months . Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON-0UTAGE) This indicator shows the total number of corrective non outage MW0's remaining open _at the end of the reporting month, along with a breakdown by severs' 'y categories. Adverse Trend: h .
- Corrective Maintenance Backlos > 3 Mo.iths Old
<> Industry Upper Quartile 80- .
A 60- / P- . l o. q_-q .-rQ - s--O -- ---O o --o - -o- -o c 40 e n t - 20-f 0 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989- 1990 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKl0_G_ GREATER.THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON-0UTAGE) This indicator shows the percentage of open corr.ective non outage- maintenance work orders that are greater .than three ' months old at the end
.of the reporting month.
The ' percentage of' open corrective non-outage maintenance. work orders .that are. greater than three- - months old - at - the- end of November was reported as 55.7%- l The industry upper quartile value for corrective
-maintenance -backlog greater than .3 months old is 45.8%..
Adverse Trend: None-l I
. 1
- Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance s + Industry Upper Quartile
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal
- 90-80-70-P 00 t (. T?y'
- -[:::$2':.&:::y,7.'::@ T::f:~2&;~ ~& *:::Q":9 9 e
n 50-t 40
^
~
GOOD 30-20 Dec_ Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun - Je1 Aug Sep Oct Nov-1989 1990 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (N0N-0UTAGE) The - ratio of- preventive to total maintenance indicator shows the ratio of completed non-outage prevent'.ve maintenance-to-total completed non-outage maintenance. The ratiolof: preventive to- total maintenance at the Fort Calhoun-Station increased to 70.2% in November -- The low ratios -in August, September, and October were due to the increased involvement of maintenance in corrective maintenance activities associated with the two forced outages which occurred in August-and September, The Fort Calhoun: goal is to have a ratio of preventive to total maintenance greater than'60%. The industry _ upper quartile 'value for- the ratio of preventive to- total maintenance is 57.7%. The Fort Calhoun - -
- Station is currently performing in .the upper quartile of nuclear piants for this_ indicator.
Adverse Trend: None SEP 41
-1 l
l
- Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue l 4
5 -O- Industry Upper Quartile e- Fort Calhoun Goal 4-GOOD P + e 3 r C - e-
" 2-o . .._ o _ _ o '
e..... e ... e ... O O O - 0 0 O O O 0 Dec. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in.-the administration and execution of preventive maintenance programs. : A- small percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue indicates a station commitment to the preventive ' maintenance program and an ability to ' p1an, schcoule, ' and perform - preventive maintenance -tasks as-programs require._ . During- November 1990, 928. PM items were completed. A total
'of zero PM: items were not completed within the allowable grace period.
~_The- Fort Calhoun goal is to 'have less than 1.2% preventive maintenance: items overdue. The: industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance i_tems overdue _is 1.2%. The Fort.
.Calhoun J Station is currer tly performing- in the industry upper o';artile_for this ind'cator.-
Adverse Trend: None 'SEP 41 L I-40-1
.- . - - . - - - - - - - - - - ~ - --.
40;
- Total Control Room Instruments Out-of-Service
+ Indu-try Upper Quartile For Total Out-of-Service Instruments
-G-- Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out-of-Service Instruments 4
. 30-
.I 7 na I
C000 A Hn
+
@N u s-
~
W'
*M n;y -
m
. ~ . ,
mt. - w w' &
?
?"
-b r 13 g 3') @fi e u 20-79 'm L : &q a u rm jg g} ]f fh~: ;(Y ; Q;g g on .
4 4 1"" yh+): d MJ M 3 M
;gy Ls' V
y 4M w g@ W
.1 ft y@
nirj Ny W m{ qq Rb Wg
;, %gg p Q1 g g!
2p! s gy
;n yy .,a ne 4 gp
(. 10- % M 7:%el, M,y t.h I lI !!m @y$ fQ
$s%N dy s
;b{;f i a - --d& at m sw .a . %w[if g e ne
/ m@-
;; m -
- m. n v
;1 ---
g-- p ---
$L --
je? --. 4; -- g --.m(L -. fw.--@ -. -- gj Ib5 . 0 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr .May .Jun Jul Aug :Sep Oct Nov 1989' 1990 NUMBER OF OUT-0F-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS Thi:s' indicator shows; the J number of' out-of-service control room -instruments, the- industry 'opper quartile; for.-this indicator, and the= Fort Calhoun goal. There was: a total of 25 - out-of-service
-control room . instruments- at the end of November.-
s
'The- Fort Calhoun goal =1s to have less -than
-.7 out-of-service control room --instruments.-
The industry Eupper . quartile value1f or the number. of out-of-service - control room
+
- instruments is 7.
Adverse Trendi. None
- Maintenance Overtime H+ 12 Month Average G- Fort -Calhoun Goal GOOD
+
60-o.....e P ,- N e e' N C O r 40- / s.s C i
\ ;
e / n '
/ \
t ./ \
- o-....d b . . . . _9 . . . . .e. .. .. . .e.. . . .. e . . . . e
< X y x t
0 Dec- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the-desired. maintenance activities with- the allotted resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and- can lead to 1 errors due>to fatigue. The percent : of-' overtime ' hours - with - respect to normal hours was reported as 9.4% during thelmonth of November 1990. -The 12 month. average percentage of overtime hours with respect to normal hours-was-reported as 17.8%. The high percentage of overtime hours reported 'for the months of February 1990 through May- 1990 was due to increased maintenance support associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage.:The high percentage-of. overtime hours reported for August, September, 0ctober, and November 1990 was due to maint...ance activities associated with the 3-forced outages during.these months. The -Fort- Calhoun goal- for the percent of maintenance overtime hours - worked -has been set at 25% for non-outage months and 50% for outage-months.
. Adverse Trenj.:. None 1 1
. . ~
l 20- 1 1 Open-IR's Related to the Use'of Procedures (Maintenance) fM1 Closed IR's Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance) J Procedural Noncompliance IR's (Maintenance)
.{
i
- N fl5-u
.m--
b _ e i r o _10-f
-88
~~
'I -
.R o- ~
s 55 $ 55 5- +;_ a
!!j @ f 3
~
3 22 _ j 5 : 2 72- ~Y 2 1 31 .l l - 1 !a ~1 1 1 O O "E $) 30 $. 4 0 3 0 0-00 000 30: 00-Dec- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun_ LJul - Aug Sep Oct Nov
-:1989- 1990- -
PROCEDURAL NDNCOMPL1ANCE INCIDENTS:
-(MAINTENANCE)- z
-i
'This indicator shows the numbar of identified g
Maintenance Incidents Reportsz -(IR's)1 that - : are -! related to the=-use of procedures, the number of 1
- closed - IR'sE thati are - related to the use--of! >
- procedures- -(includes- IR's - that were , caused by procedural noncompliance), 'and :the number of closed IRts-that were caused by. procedural noncompliance.-
4 It-1 should -be1 noted: 1-that- the second and ethird
-columns --will lagi behind: the first column until the
-IR's are closed.l This t reporting method is_ duelto the-: process in which -lR's _ receive category codes.
11R's receive - their : category' codes when ,-they : are .
. closed;
-Adverse Trendi None SEP 15L& 44 43-l
- 1
-m x n a
900-
- Open MWO's
-e- Fort Calhoun Goal
-800-o 700-Nf- -
u $ 600- &- --- G - - -- G - -- - G - - - - G - - - - G -- - - G - - - - G -- -- -Os
\
e0 ~ s r' N s 500- V G-----O ---- O 400- 4 300 Dec Jan. Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul .Aug Sep Oct Nov= 1989- 1990 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVENON-0UTAGEMAINTENANCE) This indicator shows the - number of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that are open at the end of thel reporting: month. At - the end of - November 1990, there were 348 corrective non-outage maintenance . work orders remaining.open.. The goal for; this; indicator is to: have less- than: 500 corrective non-outage maintenance. work orders remaining lopen. , Adverse Trend:_ None SEP 36~
Electrical Maintenance
- Percent of Completed Scheduled Activities
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal 100 l
80- O- ---- -O- - -- -O - - - - i& - - - - D - - -- - O -- - O ----- O L - K -----O'--- - i i ! P 60- ; ; _l e ! , t r - c C e 40- l Forced ; n Outage N N t q g 20- ; Force'd
. Outage 1
i , 0 - . . '. ', . . . 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 2 0 1 1 2 9 6 3 0 7 4 1 8 4 1 8 5 S S S S 0 0 0 0 N N N N E E E E C C C C- 0 0 0- 0 P P P P T T T T V V V V 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE) This = indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to- the number of - scheduled-maintenance activities
. Maintenance activities - concerning i ncl ude MWR's, Electrical MW0 f s ,Maintenance.
' ST's , PM0's, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.
The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator-is 80%. WEEK ENDING PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED ACTIVITIES 11/04/90 80-11/11/90 82 11/18/90 50 11/25/90- 79 Adverse Trend: -None SEP 33 Pressure Equipment
- Percent of Completed Scheduled Activities G- Fort Calhoun Goal 100-80- O --- - -G- -- - - -G--- - - - O -- - - O - - - - O -- - - - G -- -- - O - +
- G-- --O
' i P 60- - _
e ! j r - c Forced e 40- Outage t
~
< > 4' 20 Forced Outage ;
!' l 1 !
0 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 2 0 1 1 2 9 6 3 0 7 4 1 8 4 1 8 5 S S S- S 0 0 0 0 N. N N N E E E E C C C C 0 0 0 0 P. P P P T T T T V V V V
-9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PJRCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES
( PRESSURE- E0VIPdffil.). This indicator shows -the percent of- the number of completed maintenance activities - as compared . to _ the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Pressure. Equipment Maintenance.. Maintenance- activities include ' MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PM0's, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities. The Fort Calhoun Station goal for..this indicator'.is 80L WEEK-ENDING PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED ACTIVITIES 11/04/90 -95 11/11/90. 92 11/18/90 71 11/25/90 89 Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 t
General Maintenance
- Percent of Completed Scheduled Activities G- Fort Calhoun Goal 100-80- 0- - - - G - - -- G- - - - - G - iG - - - -- G - - - ~O ---O -- - - e - - - G - -- - & -- - - O
. <-> t P
60-Forced Outage: / e r . C
- 40-n t
, Forced .,
20- ! Outage NJ i 2 3 d i 2 2 0 1 1 2 9 6 3 0 7 4 1 8 4 1 8 5 S S S S 0 0 0 0 N N N N E E E E C C C C 0 0 0 0 P P P P T T T T y y y y 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDVLED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (GENERAL MAINTENANCE) This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning General Mahtenance. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MW0's, ST's, PM0's, calibration:;, and miscellaneous maintenance activities. The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%. WEEK ENDING PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULEO ACTIVITIES 11/04/90 100 11/11/90 46 11/18/90 67 11/25/90 67 Adverse Trend: None SEP 33
Mechanical Maintenance
- Percent of Completed Scheduled Activities G- Fort Calhoun Goal
.100-
! l 80- O--- -- & --- & --- Y - -- f -t>---- & --- --O --- -&-: - A- ----- -----O i i i
P 60- i e ; ; r Forced .c " e 40- l n +'-h ! t. Forced Outage l 20-4
~
0 . . . . . . . !l- - 0 1 2- 3 0 1 2 2 0 1 1 2 9- 6 3 0 7 4 1 8 4 1 8 5 S S :S S 0 0- 0 0 N N N N E E E E C C C C 0 .0 0 0 , V V -' P -P P P T T T T V V 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 k PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL . MAINTENANCE)
-This indicator shows the percent of the number of ' completed -
maintenance _ activities :as compared to the number of- scheduled maintenance - activities concerning Mechanical- Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWR's, -MW0's, ST's, PM0's, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities. The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80L WEEK ENDING PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED ACTIVITIES 11/04/90. 80, 11/11/90 83-11/18/90 65-11/25/90 75 Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 instrumentation and Control Percent of Completed Scheduled Activities
-e- Fort Calhoun Goal
~
100- i .
= !
I
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ _
80- G- ^ C. 1 l , P 60- 4
, l 0
l ! r - ' i i' Forced e 40 n l' Outage
\]\ ;
t.
< % A 20 Forced Outage I~
i i 0 . . . . . , , O 1 2' 3 0 1 2 2 0 1 1 2 9 6 3 0 7 4- 1 8 4 1 8 5 S S S S 0 0 0 0 N N N N E E E E C C C C 0 0 0 0 P P P P T T T T -V V V V 9 9 9 9 9 ~9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L l ffJtCENT OF COMPLE', u SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL) This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled '
-maintenance activities concerning Instrumentation & Control.
Maintenance activities i nclude MWR's , MW0's , - ST's , PM0's, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities. The-Fort Calhoun Station goal- for this indicator is 80%. WEEK ENDING PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULE 0 ACTIVITIES 11/04/90 81
;11/11/90- 79 11/18/90- 90 11/25/90- 91 Adverse Trend:- None~ SEP 33 l
i
4 5- [2]NumberofMissedST'sResultinginLER's. 4 4- . N- 3' u m ) b e 3 r s- J. i 1-0 0 0 0 -0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0-- 0 Dec Jan Feb Mar- -Apr May Jun .Jul Aug -Sep Oct Nov
-1989 1990
'UUMBER OF MISSED SVRVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS.
This . indicator' shows the number of missed
. Surveillance -Tests- (ST's)= that ' result in:
' Licensee Event Reports (LER's)_ during ' the reporting month, i
! During1 the month = of' November.- 1990, there; weria.vii missed ST's-that resulted-in~LER's.
p Adver:c- Trend: None SEP 60 & 61~ l-3
- p-
35-i i Total NPRDS Component f ailures 30- M Confirmed NPRDS Component Failures (' . 25-N , uF p ma gd g,. xg b i 20- fa ;;.:> .\ el . 4;; ? ru %@ $? %m;; n an r 2 14 % oe fs 3 $f g d3 gq ,, _10- k;gg Q0 #b?
% ? e &aY \
%D R4 il ip 7 $' %
j$g{} (Mgi c 5-7@g gw Q W 63 w e u , g; p?s % 04 $ #g. A %
,0 %d 99
~
%@h Mi 8-
$1 %. _&
Dec- Jan Feb Mar Apr May ~Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 i NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT REllABILITY ) DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS) REPORTABLE FAILURES
.This indicator. shows the' total number of -- NPRDS component failures and- the number' of confirmed
-NPRDS component failures. The total number of NPRDS component failures is based - upon the number of failure , reports: sent to INP0. The number of confirmedi NPRDS: component- failures is- based upon -
the number - of - failure reports that have.been accepted - by INPO. The difference of- these two figures is the number of failure reports still
--under review by INPO.
Ouring November 1990, there was a total of Zero -
- confirmed.NPRDS. component failures.
Adverse Trend: None-. l
- . - ~ _. - _ , . .- -... - .- . . - .
15 -+- Components With More Than One Failure K- Components With More Than Two Failures u m b GOOD' c e r-
-c / V 10-o f 1 C
K N ' p o 5- x,
" y - - - - -M - -- --X - -- -'-X ,
e-n s
' x ,'s t s, s 'M - - ---X- - -- - -X-- -- - X- - -- K , s ,',
O Dec Jan_ Feb Mar Apr May Jun- Jul Aug Sep- Oct- Nov 1989 -1990-- MAINTENANCE-EFFECTIVENESS The Maintenance :-Effectiveness ' Indicator.was developed following guidelines set forth by thel Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office- for Analysis and ~ Evaluation of Operational Data (NRC/AEOD). _ The 'NRC/AEOD is currently' developing and verifying a ; maintenance effectiveness indicator using the Nuclear Pl ant - Reliability Data System (NPRDS) component- failures, This - indicator shows the number of NPROS ' components with more - than one _ failure during the last twelve months and the ' number of NPRDS components with more -than two failures during the last twelve-months. The number:of NPRDS-components with more:than-two. failures in a < twelve-month period _should indicate the-L effectiveness of plant maintenance. During_ November: 1990,. there were 4 NPRDS components with: more than one failure -and .1 NPRDS component 1 with . more - than two
-failures. The- tag - number. of the NPRDS- component, with more than l4 - two' failures in~ the last twelve months is CH-lC.
-Adverse Trend:- None i
~~
20- - Check Valve Failure Rate Industry Check Valve Failure Rate F f15-5 GOOD a j lp o
~
y
)N" u
ie P e 1n 10-lt 1
- p oH e"0u r
r 5-s g_.. _g . h --b-~-b---- b-~-b b -b 0 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 CHECK VALVE FAllVRE RATE This indicator shows - the Fort Calhoun check -valve failure rate and the industry check valve failure rate. The . data ' for _ the industry check valve failure rate is- three-months .-behind the Performance Indicators Report reporting month due to .the time involved in collecting and processing- the data. The- industry . failure rate is based upon - failures that have
' occurred in:the previous 18 month-interval.
. For August 1990, ~ the' Fort .Calhoun Station reported -a check valve failure rate of 3.90E-6.while the industry reported a failure rate of 2.61E-6. At the_ endLof November,- the Fort Calhoun Station reported- a_ check valve failure rate of 1.30E-6. As of. the end of August, the check valve failure rate for Fort Calhoun was higher '
than the ' industry check valve ' failure rate. The reason for the high- check valve failure rate is that the plant is performing maintenance on check valves which have noti been tested for failures -before. _ As time goes- on, the check valve failure rate is expected to decrease due to the fact that ' the check valves are now being maintained through the Check Valve Program. Adverse Trend: None SEP 43 l
- Secondary System CPI
+- Secondary System CPI Limit 1.5-
-O- Industry Upper Quartile GOOD
+
l- -+----+---+---+---+--+---+---+----4----+----+---+
.38 .5- # N %
w pp 9,. v~ v- O- 0--+-O -O-0-0 -0 0 m 0 '88 '89 Nov Dec Jan Feb- Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct-1989 1990 1000 -- Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidelir.es 757.7- 800-k DJ H o 600-
~
$$ u GOOD 359 % r 400 + ,
g gg s l{f wp ffdf 200-N A ; [ '87 '88 Nov~ Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr .May Jun Jul Aug~ Sep Oct 1989 1990 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY The top graph, Secondarv System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI), is calculated using three parameters. The three: parameters used include; cation conductivity in steam generator blowdown,- sodium in steam generator blowdown, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen. The CPI was reported as 0.34 for- the -month of October. The CPI values for June, July, and August are high due to startup after the 1990 Refueling Outage, _ various -fluctuations in power which have occurred, and a forced outage - in -August. The industry upper-quartile;value for this indicator was: 0.16. for August 1989 through December 1989. The CPI industry value then changed to 0.24.for_1990. - The' bottom graph,- Hours Chemistry is Outside Owners Guidelines, tracks the total hours of 13 parameters exceeding guidelines during power operation. The number of hours outside owners group guidelines-was _ reported as. 3.7 hours for the month of October. The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the reporting period due- to- the time needed for data- collection and evaluation- of ~ the station chemistry data. Adverse Trends: None 10-
- Primary System Chemistry Out of Limit 8-P 6-e Y GOOD c .
e 4 n t 4 a 1*.9 .2-f$ idd - 0 M- 9 "
'88 '89 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep. Oct
- 1989- 10:0 ERINADY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY EfRCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The. Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of- Limit indicator tracks the primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters.-
- The _ Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as 1.1% for the month of October.
The high percent of-- hours out' of limit for-the
. primary system - during June- and July _ was ' due to startup after the _1990 Refueling Outage and various power fluctuations which- occurred during June and July. The high percent of. hours out of limit for the month of September 1990 was due a- shutdown and a startup - which occurred._100% equates to all_ six parameters-being out of limit for the month.
Adverse Trend: None l' , l
1
- Auxiliary System Chemistry Out Of Limit
+- Industry Upper Quartile 40-GOOD 4
30-H o u 20-r s ; 10-0 0 O~~O-4 -4'-
'^
0
'88' '89- Nov Dec Jan Fe'b Mar A)r Miy Jun 661 Ai g S'ep Oht 1989 -1990 ,
AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS
--The Auxiliary System Chemistry Hours- Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly-hours that the' Component Cooling Water-(CCW) system is outside the station chemistry l limit. _The 'above chemistry indicator is one i- month .behind the' reporting period due to the -
l- time needed for data collection and evaluation of' the chemistry data for the: station. The auxiliary system chemistry. hours outside - station : limits- was = reported as zero -for -the month of October. The industry upper quartile- value for
-auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside station limits is 2.6 hours. The . Fort Calhoun : Station is . currently performing in the upper- quartile of all nuclear _ power-plants- for this indicator.
Adverse Trend; None-I b;g;! Number of Out-of Service Instruments 20 G- Fort Calhoun Goal
~
16s^ ', I a#si sasn =Gq)
! 55 5!I N" #6iM N N D us w=r; wr.:a am =5; r wg m t 12- 5d; 3h 32W M JWi br 2E M5i slis#- iWE" 5W2 #*M #E=7 i=#M i 25 Bid L-fu= i&t;; iM . /hu^ #MM eu -
a=t =s= ;mm =5= s==ms ,5:a _ s2=s e 8- m 4+ =- tamp ints4 drs asE F 0n 1% 5: 25e v7mi IEF= M?: -is - we ihb $b Nb -kbN~kb!~ N ar bb dn5 j=bN$- kb =9= 5 was: Man m; 4- ggg v;;v p;g=3 gya apte qq 1:m cg;=; s= = n wii %s ;gg ma i==mg
;is 3==s; vm y-EQiC WlM= E?i=*M 2%%= CBMt 32 ~ii :iiE2=' Km i%hk =%dEE iM=El '*#5 MN INE 3$N$ $$ GNN EN$ 3N5 N T NN bdSE in3s MM Mis 9* MG **
0 15n3 fiMX MM!
"""'="
As!!
=""==
MfM "= = == ' V51
** [5$
MAM Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-0F-SERVICE This indicator shows the total number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of-service at the end of- the reporting month. The chemistry systems involved in this indicator include the Secondary System and the Post Accident SamplingSystem(PASS). At the end of November there were a total of 6 in-line chemistry instruments that were out -o f- service. Four of these instruments were from the Secondary System and two were from PASS. The Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in-line chenistry system instruments that are out-of-service has been set at 6. Six out-of-service chemistry instruments mP' up 10% of all the chemistry instruments which a, . ounted for this indicator. Adverse Trend: None l l
s I I Total Waste Produced 1
- Federal and State Limit I
-1000-K- 800-10
-]f o
W 9 600-ra : a s , mt S* 400-200- l I I ' ' ! 0 - - - Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May- Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov
.1989- 1990 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCEQ This indicator- shows the total amount of hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun each month. This hazardous waste consists of _ non-halogenated -
hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced. During the - month of November, 0.0- kilograms' of-non halogenated . hazardous waste was produced,144.5 kilograms of halogenated hazardous waste was-produced, and 0.0- kilograms of _ other hazardous waste was produced. Adverse Trend:.-None r l-l
- l.
5000-
- I IMonth
@ Quarter OPPD Year Limit 4000-
] 3000-m R E M 2000-1000-l 0 [- Y i$ $st: November 1990 l MAXIMUM INDIVIDVAL RADIATION EXPOSURE During November 1990, an individual accumulated 200 mrem which was the highest individual exposure for the month. The . maximum individual exposure to date for the fourth quarter of 1990 has been 329 mrem. The maximum individual exposure reported to date for 1990 has been 2,090 mrem. The high maximum individual exposure reported so far for the 1990 year to date value was a contract generator jumper. The maximum accumulated 1989 individual exposure was 1,165 mRera, received by a Health Physicist. The OPPD limit' for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem / year. Adverse Trend: None
Av Monthly Contaminations ! 500 - Cumulative Contaminations l
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal
-O Industry Upper Quartile 400-357' P a e
@M r
$0 s 300* GOOD
$b\ o a n +
gg n -
%Q 200-157 I
. '%: y, ;
i e....g...e . _e. . .. e . ..g.. 9. . e . ...g . 9.. . e . ..e
, gg o_ o _ o _o __o __o _o_o.._ o .__._o-_ ..o _ . o kg 100-n % .
m g f, f. 0 y h^ - N "' bd , _ _ _
'88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS
-There ' was - a. total of 5 skin and clothing contaminations reported for- the Fort Calhoun Station during November, 1990.
There has been a total- of 222 skin and clothing contaminations so far in - 1990. --- The high number of skin and clothing contaminations _: which occurred - during the months. of March and April- 1990 -were related to' increased activity in -the Radiation : Controlled Area (RCA) during the 1990 Refueling Outage. There. was a total of 157 skin and clothing contaminations in 1989; The- 1990 goal for skin and clothing is 150 contaminations. This 1990 -goal of- 150' contaminations includes a Fort Calhoun goal of 23 skin nntaminations.
, industry upper quartile value for total skin and clothing
/' nations is 129 per. unit annually.
, le Trend: None SEP 15 & 54 l
l 2 ---__--___---a----
e Decontaminated Auxiliary Building
-e- Fort Calhoun Goal 90-85- O-- -- - q G - - - - - G - - -- - G -- - - * - - - - @
\ /
P
+
's /
e \ / r N / c \ e e 80- b ,d t \ /
. 'N /
\ [ [\
\, /
75- b---- GOOD 70 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct. Nov 1989 1990 i DECONTAMINATED AUXILLARY BUILDIN_Q . This graph -.shows the percentage of the auxiliary building which -is decontaminated (clean) based on the total square footage and a Fort ' Calhoun goal of 85% decontaminated auxiliary building'- (non-outage months) and a goal of ' 75% decontaminated auxiliary building (outagemonths). 4 As of November 30,- 1990, 86% of the total square footage of the . auxiliary buildial was decontaminated. An increase in the percentage of the auxiliary building 'which is decontaminated is expected af ter the auxiliary building painting -is -cornpleted. This is due
-to the fact that .after the painting is finished, the
-auxiliary building will be. able to ba decontaminated
. easier. -i Myerse Trend: None SEP 54-i-
\ ,
-, .. .... -- . . ... . ~. - - . - - - .
20-
@ Number of Identified PRWP's i
N u m b
- e. -
r- [ 10-P- R
~
7 ! I W 'IrT p -14
' 5-(l ll ;
2 2 t 3 7 $$ 1 1 1 1 : M id k ~0 0l$ l3I@ ll5IQ 0 R 0- 0 l55) O pJan- Feb.- Mar Apr May Jun :- Jul_ Aug -Sep .0ct Nov .Dec 1990 1 a RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM i The -Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator shows +he number . of Poor Radiological Work - Practices (PRWP's) which
.were-identified during the-reporting _ month.
The number of f PRWP's --which are -identifier each : month should indirectly provide' a mean - t o. q u a l_i t a ti vely = 'a s s e s s .- s u pe rvi sor. - accountability f o r. _ t h e i r- workers'
, radiological performance : i During : the month of November 1990, 'one' PRWP was identified.' ,
-Adverst Trend: -None SEP 52
( 75 O Total Number of Hot Spots Q Number of Additional Hot Spots identified I u 50- - - mt - - b-es rp - o ot fs 25-i 0'i - N - - Jun Jul. Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr _ May 1:190 1991 NUMBER Of HOT SPJJ.1 . This indicator shows the total number of hot spots which have been identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun -Station and have been documented through the use of a hot spot identification sheet. A hot spot is defined as a small localized source of high radiation. A hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of- an item or piece of equipment is at least 5 times the General Area dose rate and the itera L or piece of.~ equipment's dose rate is equal to -or greater than 100 mrem / hour. At the end of November, 46 hot' spots were identified and documented to exist in the Fort Calhoun St6 tion. During the' month of November, no
- additional hot spots were identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station.
The Station ALARA committee established a goal to eliminate at least 5 hot spots during 1990. The Fort Calhoun Station has exceeded this goal. Adverse Trend: None ,
-l Oi 63-
I IMonthly Radioactive Gas Discharged
- Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged G- Cumulative Goal 785 800-w; r ,
h$ GOOD
;,,;u
,o C 600-
-4 pp g u
" -,' Ji 8 r y - i
, tm ljll e $ 400-
& ~ ~- O - - G----O --- G --- & --- O --- G --- O -- - + - ~ ~O --- O
_, frp (U I)
@3 Ms 164 2004 r-
, Sn , , ;g Mjl y; V '4?}
';y
;@ P y_ , , , ,
'88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 ftASE0VS RADI0 ACTIVE WASTC BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT 4
The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for January 1990 through June 1990. A total of 261 curies have been released to the environment from January through June of ; 1990. The Fort Calhoun Station goal is 360 curies for this indicator. The high value of gaseous radioactive waste that was released to the environment during the month of February .1990 was due to containment purge associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage. The gaseous radioactive paste being-discharged to the environment is calculated every six months. Adverse Trend: None 64-
l IMonthly Radioactive liquid Discharged
- Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged G- Cumulative Goal 231 300-228 228
] { 0 --G-- G-- G--- G-- O ---O --O - -G--e --G--- O g <
u 200-m r
' H]pi 4
y i GOOD i
"g j 100- +
J; % , a b.Q ,
'87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 20000-Ty h
15000- , O G u a s 10000-a n)0 d 5000-n 8 0 l l Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 L10VID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The_ liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment -is shown for the months of January 1990 through June 1990. The liquid radioact Wa waste that was discharged to the environment from all sources totaled 55 curies from January through = June 1990. The Fort Calhoun Station goal for-1990 is 256 curies. The bottom graph shows the volume of liquid radioactive waste that has been reletsed from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and staam generators. The volume _of liquid radioactive waste discharged to the environment from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and the steam ! generators totaled 11.6 million gallons from January through June 1990.
-The liquid radioactive waste that was- releared to the environment includes liquid released from the steam generators due to the. fact that radioisotope's were detected in the steam generator blowdown.-
The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months. Adverse Trend: None 65-
30: -==- Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Does not include System failures)
"F 25-mj20$
#0D Il is: q Y
"rto:
e . o qs S- - 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 ] 120- - Security System Failures i NF - , ua GOOD mi 80-b1 + eu r ' r 40-e ' o s . f I O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec , 1990 , LOGGABLE/REDORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) The loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security) Indicator is depicted in two separate graphs. The top graph shows the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's), security badges, , security key control, esentting, and access control. which occurred during the reporting fronth. The bottom graph
- shows- the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning security system fa"9res which occurred during the reporting. month.
During the month of November 1990, there were 71 loggable/ reportable .-incidents identified. Security system failures accounted for 65 of the loggable/ reportable-incidents (92%) reported this month, however this is a decrease of 24 loggable/ reportable incidents from the
. previous reporting period. CCTV environmental failures continue to occur, however Security- Services and Maintenance personnel- are : currently -working on several-l_ approaches -in an attempt -to resolve some of these:
problems. Adverse Trend: None SEP 58
- 66-
,w wer++- e-- , y 4w w .
.~e e r w y ,-.w---,w w -w w-m..r-- m-w.,,.___ ,-.,,.__--r-mc,. . . - , , - , . . . . . .....m__.., ~ , . - - - - - . - - .., ---. .
7._
.- t 4
E September 1990 150- I~iFi October 1990 i R November 1990 1 - i NI un 100-c gg
- me <
2 bi GOOD 77 M ed - dd i re E E 65 n fi$ Gli ot' 50-fs p ' Th r5
=:c:
2 5 5: 0 1 0 0 0 i i 0 0 0 0 0 1 ... 0 0 0 yM LOV's Badges Key Esecrting Access System Control Control Failures SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN The Security incident Breakdown Indicator shows the number of incidents- concerning the following items for the reporting month in column form. - These items include: Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's), security badges, .' security. - key control, escorting, access control, and security system failures. Security items Number of-Incidents NOV .. OCT .1LP_. E Licensee Designated Vehicles (LOV's) 0 0 1 Security Badges 5 0 2 - Security Key Control 0 0 0 Escorting 1 0 0 Access Control 0 0 0 . Security System Failures _il .39._ 77
-Total- -71 89 80
' Adverse Trend: -None: SEP 58 l'
o
. . . ., ..-.. a. - . - . - . . - . . - . _ . - . _ . . . = - . . . = . . . - . - .
~ "' *"***
- I*'*
40-m System Failures N u 1 m 30' 28 e r GOOD 20-F 16 a --
!$L i
I =$ lo = pag u 10 r glb , , , , . _ 8 b
- n ..
29M "' = Y 2 0- ] O O . . . 0 0 ]N O . 0 Alarm System CC1V Computer Terminal Door Card Reader SECURITY SYSTEM FAllVRES This indicator shows the number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month, shese items include: alarm system failures, CCTV failures, security computer failures, terminal failures, door equipment failures, and card reader failures In addition to this-information, alarm system failures and CCTV failures will be divided into two categories, environmental and failure as indicated in the Definition Section. System Failures Number of Incidents NOV 90 OCT 90 ENVIRONS FAllVRES ENVIRONS fAllVRES A Alarm Systems 10 16 5 22 CCTV 28 2 42 4 Computer N/A 0 N/A 3 Terminal N/A 1 N/A 1 Door Equipment N/A B N/A 11 Card Reader N/A 0 N/A I Total 38 27 47 42 Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 l
\
15- - Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts q i a 12-
~
GOOD P 9, 4 - e r C - e E 6-N# 0 - Dec Jan Feb Mar _ Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS
-_(NON001 AGE)
This procurement indicator . displays the amount. of open, non outage,- maintenance , items that are on hold awaiting parts, to
- = the 9 total amount. of - open, non-outage, maintenance items, expressed as a-percentage.
The percentage of work on hold awaiting parts increased to 3.9% in November. As of November 30, 1990, there were a total of 867 open, non outage, maintenance items with 34 of these items on hold awaiting parts. Myerse- Trend None
i , u .. 4 12-4
- Spare Parts inventory Value 4 ....
M -
- ,1 i
10- ,' n
.s 2 1 o f 1 D [
?
r s-f s Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov-1 1989 1990 i 1 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The spare parts inventory value.at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of November 1990 , was reported as $10,686,665. Adverse Trend None d f
4 750-T
* -SparePartsissuedl h
o u 600-6 a - n d 450 o I 300-0 150- _ a r - s 0 Dec Jan Feb Mar-- Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov-1989 1990 SPARE PARTS ISSVED The .value of the spare parts issued during November 1990, totaled $201,806. Adverse-Trend: None
\
l
- Inventory Accuracy 100-95-P e
r C e 90-n t 85-80 -- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 INVENTORY ACCURACY This indicator shows the accuracy of the actual parts count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained in the MMIS computer system for the reporting month. During November, 1,420 different line items were counted in the warehouse, Of the 1,420 line items counted 35 items needed count adjustments. The inventory accuracy for the month of November was reported as 98%. Adverse Trend: None l l e 5- - Pick Tickets With Parts Not Available 4- i P pi eC rk 3 C eT ni tC k 2-oe ft , s-1- J 0 - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun- Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 STOCK 0VT RATE This indicator shows -the percentage of the number of Pick Tickets generated with no parts available during the reporting month. During the month of November, a total of 747 Pick Tickets were generated. Of the 747 Pick - Tickets generated, zero Pick Tickets were generated with no parts available, Ad' verse' Trend: None
,. s
4 l I 1500 -O- Total Receipts 6- Spare Parts Receipts
-O- Standard Stores Receipts
- D keet Marge Receipts j 1200-
. O l N / ;
uf900- e > C b e ,4 rp ,, t 600-O
- 300- . ,0.;
,..$ ,:f$:>g} -g;=$,,.
O Feb Mar Apr. May Jun. Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1990 1991 WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS This indicator shows the~ total number of warehouse receipts, the number of-- spare parts receipts, the number of standard stores receipts., and the- number of direct charge receipts during the reporting month. During= November the warehouse received a total of 456' receipts, Of the 456 receipts received,- 112 1 were spare parts receipts, .114 were standard ;
. stores receipts, and- 230 were direct- charge ,
receipts. Adverse Trend: None l. i L 74
-. _ _ . , - - _ . , _ , _ . . . - - _ . . . _ , . _ _- _ . _ . . . _._.__z.___. . . _ _..
4000- -s- Total Issues 6- Spare Parts issues o Standard Stores issues
+H Direct Charge issues 3000-I.~"k
*s M e
8 u 2000- \ 's r e a s O o - I o.- .o __, _g'N 1000-O /'-*~ %
,- ~~.
- o. .o y Q. O-
. .O- 'O cl....f.- -&=-&%
0 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1990 1991 WAREHOUSE ISSUES This indicator shows the total number of warehouse issues, the number of spare parts issues, the number of standard stores issues, and the number direct charge issues for the reporting month. During November the warehouse completed a total of 892 issues. Of the 892 issues completed, 215 were spare parts issues, 497 were standard stores issues, and 180 were direct charge issues. Adverse Trend: None l I
i 80- e Total Returns 6- Spare Parts Returns
- -O- Standard Stores Returns
--- Direct Charge Returns 60-T Po et C
8 nI 40- / ,A ts s
\'
s ,
\\
~
ou \ / fe 6 s
./// ', ]// s 20- N, / \x '
l 'f a 'h
' ~ N 53 - l , D
' o. O.
b[" . . . -o - - -O Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1990 1991 WAREHOUSE RETURN 1 The Warehouse Returns Indicator shows the percentage of the total number of warehouse returns, the number of spare parts returns, the number of standard stores returns, and the number of direct charge returns compared to the total number of warehouse issues during the reporting month. During the month of November there were a total of 892 warehouse issues. Of the 892 issues, there were 121 total returns. These returns consisted of 80 spare parts returns and 41 standard stores returns. Adverse Trend: None 4 l . ]
- 25 I ISeptember 1990 g= October 1990 3 November 1990 M 20-a t
e Nr u i 15-ma bl ~
-e rR e 10-oq fu , ,
e s = t 5- 4 s i n3
~
s .. !
. : am xn ;
0- i- d5[d IIhh 05 6 10 11-15 16 20 21 30 >30 Age in Days MATERIAL RE00ESTS AWAITING APPROVAL This indicator shows: the number of material requests awaiting approval: at' the end of the reporting month: broken - down into their' age by days. i At the end of November, 9 material requests were awaiting approval. Adverse Trend: None
,- . . _ . . . _ . - _ . - . _ ..a..._. _ ... ..-. . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . , - . _ _ _ _ _ - , , _ _ _ _ . . _ _ - _ . - .
i 2
- Percentage of Total Purchases that are Expedited 1.5-l P
e _ r C l' e n t - 1
.5-
, 0 - Jan Feb Mar _ Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 EXPEDITED PURCHASES , This indicator shows' the percentage of expedited purchases compared to_ the total-number of purchase orders generated 1 during the reporting month. During November, there was a total- of 324 purchase orders generated. Of the 324 purchase orders-generated, there was zero expedited purchases, i
- Adverse Trend: None 78- t
" - ~ ~ ~ ~ -- = l 150-l~lSeptember1990 l O October 1990 E November 1990 120- )
N
$n90-V !
b e* - rc n e 60-ts g7, l g i .. Shelf Life CQE Misec11aneous
. INVOICE BREAKDOWN This in;iicator shows- the number of invoices that are on hold at the end- of
, the reporting month due to shelf life, CQE, and miscellaneous reasons. At the end of. November, 1 invoice was on-hold ~ due. to shelf life reasons, 51 : invoices were on hold due to CQE reasons, and 30 invoices were on- hold due to miscellaneous reasons. Adverse Trend: None i-1. L._ _.-,.._.m.. . . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ . . _ _ . _ . . _ _ . _ . . . _ . . . _ . . . _ _ . . _ . . . _ _ _ . .__;.__
- . . - . - . . . . - - - . . - . - . _ - - - _ - . . - . . . . - . - - - - - . - . - . - ~ . .
3 i 100- - Percentage of Material Requests for Issues with the Request Date the same as the Need Date l s 80-4 . ._ , j , , P 60-1 e 4 r c - 4. n 40 t 20- , O . -
- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec i; 1990 i
4 l MATERIAL RE0 VEST PLANNING l This indicator shows the percent of material. requests- (MR's) for= issues with their request date the same as their need date a compared to the total number -- of MR's. for ; issues for the reporting month _, ! 4 During. the month of November, a total of 747 MR's were received _ by the warehouse. Of the - 747 total MR's received = by the warehouse, 509 MR's were for--issues with their request l date the same as their need date. Adverse Trend: None- ,
.80-u ....-.:. . - . . . = . - . - . - . - - . ~ . -
700' - Total Modification Packages Open 600-2 500-425 425 v A - 384 ..;o , 400-3 ,p ,
'y ., n
^
4 [ W , 300-g- ,,
%, I e-x 200
'87 '88 '89 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1980 1990 OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The total number of outstanding modifications increased by 6 during the month of November.
CATEGORY . SEP 90 OCT 90 NOV 90 t Form FC-Il33 Backlog /In Proaress 12 13 14 t Mod Requests 8eing Reviewed
- 141 137 134 Design Engr, Backlog /In _ Progress 84 90 98 Construction Backlog /In Progress 44 39 38 Desian Enar. Vodate Backloo/In Proaress 56 .11 __Q2 Total 337 340- 346 As of the end of November, 70 additional modification requests have been -
issued this year. and 15 modification requests -have been cancelled. The
-Nuclear Projects-Review Committee (NPRC) has completed 157 backlog modification request reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) has completed 138 backlog modification request reviews this year.
' The number of reviews completed is high due to the - fact that some _ of-these requests were reviewed more than once. The number of temporary modifications which are 6 9 months old have been' increasing, but further investigation reveals that_4 out ;of the 6 temporary modifications that are 6 9 months old require an outage for removal.
Adverse Trend: . None - Reason for trend is given above.
_ .. _ -. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ ~ , 100 Total Temporary Modifications M .
.e- Fort Calhoun Goal o
Nd 80-ui . mf 60- A bi
- ec l- ra 40 t
- ~
20 l
' 3. . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . _ e 0
Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 M September 1990 N 8- PM) October 1990 , Nd ! INovember 1990 l mf Ms] bi-ec 4 gg w;== g cm y 1 ra gfM 0i t 2' 7g g y ____ M iM 51 as IO fi N A 5 $ n M
- s 0
-03 36 6-9 9 12 > 12 Age in Months TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING)
The- top graph shows -the total number of temporary modifications
-installed in the Fort Calhoun Station -and a Fort Calhoun goal.
The number of electrical- temporary modifications and the number of mechanical temporary modifications have been deleted from this indicator because the Plant no longer categorizes temporary modifications in this manner. At the end of November, there was a total of 19 temporary
~
modifications installed in - the Fort Calhoun Station.- The Fort Calhoun goal for the total number of_ installed _ temporary modifications _ is less -than 15 installed temporary modifications. The bottom graph, Aae of Teaocrary Modifications, displays -the age of ' all temporary modifications by_ months installed in the plant. Adverse Trend: None SEP.62 & 71 3
. . . . - . -..- .- - . _ . - ~ . ~~- , . -.. - - , - -
200- + Total Number of Open EAR's N 150-u .
- 100- , ,
"~
e c, r 50-
~
0 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun i 1990 1991 E October 1990 80- G November 1990 ; u December 1990 60- - m .y b 40- e i e v Y 20 d? , 0 -
- MID 03 36 >6 $
Aa t in Months OUTS 1ANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE.BLQ ES.IS (EAR's) The top grt.ph shows the total number of open EAR's at the end of the reporting month. At the end of November, there was a total of 139 open EAR's. The bottom graph shows the total number of open EAR's broken down by their age in months. Adverse Trend: The number of open EAR's has increased from 59 in May 1990 to 139 in November 1990. The major reason for the increase in the number of open EAR's is the result of questions generated during the ' process of upgrading procedures by the Procedures Upgrade Project. SEP 62 83-1
-,~ ~ - - .-
_. . - - . -.-- - -_ ~ . - _. - -. 150- -& lotal ECN's Open 46 ECN's Opened During the Month I o- ECN's Completed During the Month D
'./
120-pf u / m
-Os b
e 90- g hg G x g
!/
/ N N
*t
/ \
% /
I.3
,7' o , 'r3 l \
f_ D / \ E 60-
,x' .,
- o. // ., \ s
/'g3 x C / y \ '
/ N, N
/ \v '
l 'n l c \ , ,' ' \ .
.. :.:"' l 'x ,
s 30-N N '\ ' -
~o /
\ ,- '
o- -D j D 0 \[ Y, 0-Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATM The indicator shows the total number of open Engineering Change Notices (ECN's), the number of ECN's opened during the reporting month, and the number of ECN's completed during the reporting month. At the end of November 1990, there was a total of-127 open ECN's. During the month of November, 37 ECN's were opened, and 27 ECN's were completed. Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 l
) . 300 I IDocument Change I- =l Substitute Replacement item 268 Facility Changes 250- ' 216 1 200- j
, 3) 150~
136 I l 100 -
=
50- 44 47 36 m ,
~
15 14 5
,8 7 5 0
I b#M ! i
'-- - N -*
Total ECN's ECN's Opened ECN's Completed Total ECN's Open During the Month During the Month Received ENGINEERING CHANQE NOTICE BREAKDOWN This indicator breaks down the total number of Engineering Change Notices (ECN's) that remain open at the end of the reporting month, the number of ECN's that were opened during the reporting month, the number of ECN's that were completed during the reporting month, and the number of ECN's received by Design Engineering during the reporting month into several categories. These categories include: ECN's requiring a document change to complete, ECN's requiring substitute replacement items to complete, and ECN's requiring facility changes to complete. Total Open Opened comoleted Received Document Changes 44 15 15 268 Substitute Replacement 36 14 7 216 facility Changes 47 8 5 136 Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 85-
-.. o~
l 5- 81990 Recordable Injury Frequency Rate
-H- 1989 Recordable Injury Frequency Rate 4'5- +- 5 Year Average Recordable Injury frequency Rate 4- l 3.5-
. GOOD 3- 4, R -
42 - y I
+
f.5 - ,
\ <
, g
s,.
, +' '+ , .
,4 .... .... -+ .' -g.-p .g#M . . . - +
1.5- '
'+/ g/ .
yv r- a n + 1- _ , ;X . K v 7% u; %pl w%g 3 3 _ h ht N i 6a'n - Fe'b Mar . Apr May- Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec P l RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FRE00ENCY RATE This indicator shows the monthly recordable injury cases frequency rate in column form. The- above _ graph also includes the 1989 recordable-injury. cases frequency rate and the - Fort . Calhoun Station -5 year average recordable injury cases frequency rate. A recordable injury _ case is reported if Nuclear Operations Division personnel are injured on the- job and require corrective medical treatment. The recordable- cases -frequency - rate is computed on a
. year-to date basis. There were two recordable injury cases ' reported
-during the month-of- November. There has .been. a total of 9 recordable -
injury cases.so__far in 1990, i
'There were eleven recordable: cases reported in 1989, eleven reported in
~ 1988, . and eight reported in 1987. -The year end recordable injury.
frequency rates; for 1987, 1988, and ,1989 were . 2.5, 2.6, and 2.2 4 respectively. L Adverse Trend: None SEP.15 & 26 t v e m1 *"* *m Ve a-tR+- g -w *gwrypw,m- .c g p g y mm.rg. -ygyyc.m m ww--*y9-y- q =mn--s.4+ w y*+-y-amu v e w-gw-ew w w w r--e rw,y-uswy-ws=- ee mie' we w w a-rve
O Licensee Event Reports I IPersonnel Errors Reported in LERs
- Cumulative Licensee Event Reports
--- Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 50-46 7 -
39 . 40 m + lis
, .:n .
i if 13 31 y
.s M y E.y -
30-g .ls26 - n 4-y p
~
m 99 dp[ Y ',, 20 4 : 17 a
- e e a
A J;
$ 12 6 10 e ~
5
, n ,. . ..
, 3 r rk,k'5I I ~ ~l b [~~l rr, h, em ,
'87- '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ,
1990 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERROR $. REPORTED IN LER'S The- Number of' Personnel Errors Reported in LER's Indicator reports the Licensee Event Reports (LER's) .by- invir event y date. In November'1990.-there_was one LER_ reported. This LER was- ! not attributable to personnel error. There have been 27--LER's reported so far.in-1990 and 8 LER's-have been attributable to personnel errors.__ Adverse Jr.gnd: None SEP 15 - 1 87-
0 uclear Operad ons Division Turnover Rate ' 10-Production Engineering Division Turnover Rate )
-o Nuclear Services Division Turnover Rate 8-4
.T u .
r
^
*n 6- ,
u,.. g', f D y : / . e r A A, F M ~
\,
B--- a
~4- , % ,^9 W ' B . 4
'~'
a t
,- '6'
. ., _ g _ _ _ ,,,, ,g e ;
2- 6 'O~ ~o--O'O-O -G-G-o._.-o o--o
.s i
/ \
/ ,
^
O -- -
-0 -
X S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D 1989 1990 I8
^
PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE j Data dating from July:-1,1988 has been assembled to produce the ~ annual turnover rates for the three Nuclear Divisions. The turnover rates for the three Divisions are calculated using only resignations from OPPD. DIVISION TURNOVER RATE ' N00 6.1% PED 4.6% NSD '1.8% Currently, th'e OPPD corporate turnover rate 1,s being reported as a) proximately 4.0%, This OPPD corporate turnover rate is
~
basec on the turnover rate over the last three years.- Adverse Trend: None
]
c
-88 1
i
O c- _ 600, 4 G Actual Staffing 561 - R Authorized Staffing 539 r
-w .m
*JM7:S
. *g;tgj p;
;M 9, @t;ii sg ? ^et p 400 - -
-~
- 3. . .
e m': f, r i w[ f nf;;d\in l .d i g ; o - ;, n 1"NW 4 n M .M e Y ,? N 3 g*e 205 1 200- M 4,
-~
ail> ):'g;^J-) . y J h~. '
- g. W r
4:1 ; , 7,: e_ :,,:i
. v4
( , :l _ ._ & $
~
o, g1un es y;
- s. 9 o q7m
' g_ L M nlpg,y$4 v 55 52 3 1 l 1 + ;;;O1 m :
.a -4 .,gnf }"
(
-e
, t c.
Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Nuclear Services Division Division Division I b STAFFINR_ LEVEL The authorized and actual staffing levels are shown f)r the three Nuchar Divisions. Adverse Trend: None SEP 24 3 a 5 1
+
b
'I e
. 09~ l
, --- - _ - _ _ _ _ . _ -_ ._ _a
I ISR0 Examinat. ion Pass Ratio 100- -- S R co. G
~
P 004
\
R 4'b a t i - 20-l j No Exams 1 Administered 0 l L NRC Administered NRC Administered NRC Administered OPPD M* hostered Generic Site Specific a.equalification Requd i(L stion
,undamental Exams Exams Enu, Exams 10 1 5 ftSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO The SR0 Licente Extminatfra Pass Ratio Indicator shows tha number of NRC administered Generic fundamentals Exams (GFE's), the number of HRC administered Site Specific E.ums, the number of NRC administered license requalification exams, and the number of OPPD administered license requalific) tion exams. Two SR0 License and three Generic Fundanontals Examinati'ans triere administered during October 1990. Twenty six OPPD Requali'ication Examinations were administered in November 1990. The t47S Tj!.,v lists the ex6m nation pass ratic for examinations w'nich havs been tTkee during 1990.
OPPD ADMINISTER 3 NRC ADMINISTERED
'Requal #eneric ..:nd. Site Spec. Requal.
DATE _ K PASS RATIQ [.jiSSRA710 % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO Feb 1990 - 104 - - Oct 1990 - 10 0 100 - Nov 1990 88.5 - - - 6herteTrend: None SEP 68 L . . .. . _ - _ - - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - _ - - _ _ . -_-
f~~l R0 Examination Pass Ratio-100-R- 80-0 P a s- 60-s- R a 40-
-t i *
' o 20-i
. No Exams ^
Administered 0 NRC Administered NRC Administered NRC- Admiliistered OPPD Administered
= Generic- Site Specific ' Requalification Requalification Fundamental Exams Exams -Exams-O Exams-a R0 llCENSE EXAMINATION PASS-RATIO
- The R0 License Examination Pass. Ratio Indicator shows the number of-NRC-
-administered Generic FundamentalsE Exams- (GFE's), the; number of : NRC -
ad71nistered ~ Site Specific Exams ,-the number ofi NRC: administered-license requalification -exams,- and - the - number ; ofx OPPD-- administered - license > requalification exams - Two - R0 License -and six Generic - Fundamentals-Examinations were administered during the month of October
-1990.- Eleven OPPD- Requalification Examinations were- administered -during -
- November' 1990.- The table = below lists the examination pass - ratio for- .
. examinations which have been taken during.1990.
-OPPD ADMINISTERFQ -NRC ADMINISTERED--
Requal Generic Fund.- . Site: Spec. Requal. DATE: % PASS RATIC- % PASS RATIO %-PASS RATIO -%-PASS RATIO- ' Feb.1990- -- 100--
~
May-1990' -- -- 100~ - Octil990 :'
- -100 100- .--
-Nov.1990: -90.1 - - -
Adverse Trend: None- SEP 68
- q u
s
l y L.+- l 1 ISR0 Exams Administered J' SRO Exams Passed
'e R0 Exams Administered
+ R0 Exams Passed
.--. 'd' L'
n : m ; .; ; b 1 .;: j e r 'Q
- u :s
$d 5 j
o 20-
& = j f 9 s
=
1 -
- Wi :s Ej :
E -
- {
j E g x .
- L i igjs ;
a g gg 4 m 10 { , q q gj s- : y _= g s,j gj p g i, 59 I Eg El i
- - ? :: A ::; :: s. -
g
- - 7 = ; =a
=
x . p :: 6 ::s yg 0
- N Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov_ Dec 1990 ,
LLQfNSE CANDIDATE EXAMS
.This indicator shows' .the number of SRO and R0 quizzes and -exams taken and passed each month. These internally administered quizzes and exams are. used to plot the SRO and- RO candidates' monthly progress. After Training
" evaluation the data for some months. was
. changed to . reflect the correct data.-
- During. the month of November 1990, 12 SRO exams were administered, Out of the -12 exams taken, 9 exams were passed.
During . the _ month of ' November . 1990, 18 R0 exams were administered. Out of. _ the 18 R0 exams taken, 17 exams were passed. Adverse Trend: .None- SEP 68- = l. h 9 M Hotlines Initiated 50- rg;]HotlinesClosed g [G Hotlinet Open Under 4 Weeks 45-E Hotlines Open Over 4 Weeks N u 40-m b 35- o ? e 30-o f 25-
" ~
u
; i t + .
1 15- d ! 3 i ? i i 9 i ,LG EM i i- , E9 n e 10- 75 N 5 i$ g; g
/l 3f g
E3 g; g; Il
;g $$
g) d.;j 4 gj ]., : s h F3 i 5 li - w -: 3 i d $ E6 4 5 m 5'
$} ! }k 1: M dii [ [h I N L$ Y
- l1 I h.
O Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 HOTLINFJ This indicator shows the number of Hotlines initiated during the reporting month, the number of Hotlines closed during the reporting month, the number of Hotlines that remain open and are -less than four weeks old, and the number of Hotlines that remain open and are older than four weeks old, During the month of November 1990, there were 7 Hotlines initiated, 7 Hotlines closed, 4 Hotlines that remained open and were less than four weeks old, and 5
+ Hotlines that remained open and were older than four weeks old.
Adverse Trend: None 1
! ! ,- 1 4 af Planned Classroom Hours l IActual Classroom Hours ;
-T- _
_ {' h 3; ; . p o m M g s-m f Ih "- N- a
.a E Mr a fiI
" f=,
d h 5a m ,, h,c s 2- .!{j fifj ! s .. z $j-W W 6 N# q o j$ m $ N
@l h4 I f Le j ii 'd
- 2 de g sj H Vi $ @ 4 s ? is S o Q $ $ $*
L 2 lG f lE-
" l- en M .* = m M~
~
w a is g- 31 g e e, c
-r m Wa
;;; m v t m s
3,8 <
'i M W = 5 d. 4k. 44 W1 R p; : ?q m 39 .q e' -w ;a #t
@"^ $ h4 i Ps b._ m& (f % 1 0 fe 1a 9 :y ;
@e-r Mi. ca ys) a yz ;,x; 1B 4
Q we bk u, h* lY YE n* 'i$ $y 5 ? 4 Ail gs eg 4 , q gy' .'R = 0._
#4 ' 'I g'A
" fr*{ 9 I* " "
-Nov. Jan- 'Feb' Mar Apr May- Jn - Jul Aug Sep Oct
.1989 . Dec~ M90 ;
s
-J CLASSROOM (INSTRUC11R) HOURSJ Thi s Lindicatorn di' splays: thet ' number of planned classroom hours and the number of actual classroom hours for the Fort Calhoun Station.
This- . indicator is - onet 'monthI behind'. the reporting monthL- due -to -the j time to : collect and process the - e
- needeu information.
' Adverse--Trend: . N.one. -
L
t U Operations Im Maintenance Chemistry and Radiation Protection 30 @ Technical Support x< General Employee Training l T h Other 0 25-u s a n 20-d e o 15-g- g " h H
~
4 E. ' o 10- = l r ! g .. 5- C "-- -- -
.1 ..... . ....
Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1989 1990 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection,. Technical Support, General Employee Training, and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed to collect and evaluate the data. Total Hours
-TRAINING SEP 1990 OCT 1990 Operations 2,634 3,459 Maintenance 2,565 3,882 Chemistry and 1,632 953 Radiation Protection Technical Support 3,697 1,956 General Employee Training 3,855 4,952 Other 1J22 349 Total 15,305 15,551
&dverse Trend: None r
- Total' Outage MWO's a NWO's Ready to Work 600 N 400- ---------- ----------------------------------------------------------------
mM-b il e0 - o -. 7 s: o ( 200- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L e O Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan. Feb Mar- Apr May 'Jun Jul 1990- -1991 MWO OVERALL STATUS-(1991 REFUELING OUTAGE)
- This indicator: shows the total nu:rber of MWO's- that have been: written over theEpast - reporting _ periodsJ for '
completion during the 1991 Refueling = Outage and the number of -MW0's that are ready for -work: (the parts -for
- these MW0's are staged, the procedures' are approved, and the. paperwork is ready for field. use). Any MWO's written after ~ the start of the _ outage will be reflected in the indicator -l abel ed Emeroent MW0's. Approximately 3000 maintenance ~ orders were completed during each- of. the previous two refueling outages.
Additionalcdata' points will be ~added to 'this= indicator as information' becomes available. Adverse Trend: None SEP 31
_ _ . . . ~ . - - _ . _ - - . _ _ ~ ~ _ . _ - . _ . . _ . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - . _
- Total Outage Modifications
-& Mods With Planning Document Approved
-e- Mods With Final Design Approved
-s- Mods With Construction Package Approved 30 --
D M o
'N d ui 20- .---------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------
mf. bi ec- . ra t
- 10_ _____ ...__. .__ __________..________________ __________________.. ..__.. ....__.
n s
-0
{ QA_ " Aug Sep Oct Nov- Dec Jan Feb Mar. Apr May Jun Jul 1990 1991 PROGRESS OF 1991 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING
'This : indicator shows .the number of. modifications approved for planning
- o. . (to _ determine -feasibility) for completion : during the 1991 Refueling Outage. Additional data points will be added ' to' this- indicator as L
- informat ion becomesi available.
The current schedule for completion of- the modification phases of the 1991;Refuelirc %tage _is tas follows.- L0utage_ Scope Freeze ............................ OCT 1, 1990 P1anning DocumentsLApproved ...................-FEB- 22,_1991=
'FinalTDesigns Approved ........ ..-.............- APR 24,:1991 .
Construction Packages: Approved ................ JUN 15,-1991
- - Schedule Incorporated ....................r...._JUL _
26, 1991- : E -Material'On-Site ~.............................. JUL126 19911 ,- . Construction Started .......................... OCT- 21, 1991-L Construction Compl ete--. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NOV 4,- 1991 -
- Accepted By~ SACE...._.,,........................._NOV. 15, 1991 A_dverse Trend: -NoneL SEP 31:.
)
Total Outage Projects Projects with Preliminary Schedules Submitted 50 F 40 -
-N p .
up o 30 b e - e . I C t 20 o s f 10 g
-0 -
Aug. Sep. Oct Nov Dec Jar. Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1990 1991 QVERALL PROJECT STATUS
- (1991 REFUELING OUTAGE)
This indicator shows the status of the projects.which affect the scope of the 1991-Refueling.0utage. The reduction in the number of total outage projects is due to reclassification of former projects to ECN's or . Maintenance
. items.
Additional . data points will be added to this indicator as information. becomes available. The- schedule- for the 1991 Refueling Outage projects is as follows.
-All Projects. Identified-and Outage-Scope Frozen ....... OCT 1,-1990
. All Projects Scheduled in Detail ...... JUN 2t.,199?
Procedures Ready . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AUG 2, 199.'. Parts. Staged .......................... AUG 16, 199l Adverse Trend:: None SEP 31
- Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal 15-11.1-10.6 7 ;
-y p' GOOD 12-4 mkN n -
$ 9-M U e---- e --- e ---- - ---e---e--- e---- e --- e --- e --- e --- o M%
p . 7@h! e g;p W$ 4 *YM / 6-N 'i G$ Qn
's s i ),j '[[
\$ h IN n! NM M 3-7 Sy gp
% g
# % Og O
'87_~'88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per 1000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator was -calculated .using the number of_ violations and the number = of: inspection hours- from submitted inspection -
reports. These . inspection reports. consisted of reports from the months of January-1990 through October 1990. Data -forJ this. indicator for the month of October 1990 was , not available-at t_he time of publication.
-.This . indicator is one month behind 'the reporting month due to - the time ' involved with - collecting and processing the data.-
The- violations per 1000 -inspection _ hours indicator was reported as 7.6 for the month of-September 1990. There have been a total of'1,972 inspection hours ~ in.1990 which-have resulted in 15 violations. The= goal for .the _ number of violations per 1000 inspection
' hours is less than 8.2.
Adverse Trend: None. 4 l 1
4 0 . ,
- 75- 1 I Number of Violations During the Last 12 Moinhe 8 Number of NCV's During the Last 12 Months V ~
i o 1, a t 50- 47 N. u i - m0 41 41
'bn 38 e
s- - -36 - _37 34 34 r a 0~ 27 0 - d f 25-21 21 -21 19 20 N _,,. .~ C 16 % c$ 16 14 14
-. y 14 m @Q m 7
%] 12 11 7 si h th @X fj y ~7 TJ .
2 u S E N a M N h yW5 l$ 10! s hi e a22 M a is y:e aM j;; W hN
- q sfp
,0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May- Jun- -Jul Aug Sep- Oct Nov Dec 1990-CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCV's (TWELVE-MONTH RUNNING. TOTAL)
The Cumulative Violations and ~ Non-Cited
.' Violations -(NCV's) Indicator. shows the cumulative number of violations for- the last '
twelve months and -the cumulative number 1of.-
'NCV's for=the last twelve months.
During2the = last twelve- months, - violations
'have been identified -and- 12 NCV's have been identified.
. Adverse Trend: -None-
-100-
- Total Outstanding CAR's y Outstanding CAR's > Six Months Old E Outstanding CAR's That Are Modification Related 200-150-
/
o - Nf - u mC 100-bA eR r' - s 50- N. E, myuu , , py: , x+ w :-
.;f, 9 4~lM
-gy %, g', w;hN a 4c -
ign ;f- ,+ ?
' ;d':
f qj ' . ' 7.g .
':X:
0 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS b This indicator shows the total number of outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CAR's), the number of outstanding CAR's that are greater than six months old, and the number of outstanding CAR's that are modification related. As of the end of November 1990, there were 167 outstanding CAR's, 53 CAR's that are greater than six months old, and 11 CAR's that are modification related. Adverse Trend: None
-101-
0- O N0D Overdue CAR's _Nf.40-u- 30- N0D CAR's With Extensions Granted mC bA 20-s0 ky- .- b ---- Q~p . _ . . . ..h-&----- p -... p .. ..+ w w --
- &'-~~ ~ p Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989- 1990 o 50q e - PED Overdue CAR's N f 40-u 6- PED CAR's With Extensions Granted 20 r
- 10 -
s y 6 ~'g Aw d -P i$f""-t O''-U' g-O'~~'"# '~~O'--~~ { - Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jiin Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 1 10 0 Other Overdue CAR's N 8-u 6- Other CAR's With Extensions Granted-6- , mC bA- 4 , e,R 2-s d' - a m- m . -O-"~N imm ' A -- - - 0 - _m v u w
- Dec Jan feb-'Na'r Apr- May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov:
1989 1990 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED-CORRECTIVE-ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the number of-~ overdue CAR's. and the number of CAR's which received extensions broken down:by organization.- OVERDVE CAR's-
-0RGANIZATION SEP 90 -0CT 90 NOV CO
- N00- 1 0 0 PED :1 1 1 4 Others 0 0 0
. Total 12: 1 1 CAR's-WITH~ EXTENSIONS GRANTED-
-0RGANIZATION SEP 90- ~0CT 90- NOV 90 N0D -3 6 5 PED-- 5 7 :6
.0thers 0 0- 0 Total- l8: 13 11.
Adverse Trend:' N'one l t-t
-102-L i
~ . . .
4
.. 1 N 150- -e- NOD CAR's >6 Months Old 100- 6- N0D CAR's <6 Months Old
$C 50- b~ ~ ~ ~ L m.
.....s-- ..g - -b- -b .$ . . -b -- --& -. 5 -h r' C s 0 O o - m m o -p- n -m m a
Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 o 150-Nf -e- PED CAR's >6 Months Old < u 300 6- PED CAR's <6 Months Old mC bA 50-eR T gyg, _ _ -O_ , , ,, ,, ,g, , , , ,g, _ , , ,g,_ , , _g s o Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1900 o 40 3 Nf -a- Other CAR's >6 Months Old u 30-6- Other CAR's <6 Months Old mC I 20-bA 8 7 10- 6-- - ;$ q . ..-6 . -6 s- _ - - - - - 6 ' ' N p -A
$ P~ "
a G E E 0 - Dec-- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun .Jul Aug -Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS CURRENT STATUS This indicator shows the number of CAR's that are' older than 6 months and the number of CAR's .that are less than 6 months -old broken down by organization,
' CAR's GREATER-THAN 6 MONTHS OLD ORGANIZATION SEP 90 OCT 90 NOV 90 N00 9 8 10 PED 45 43 '43 Others -1 1 2 Total 55- 52 55 CAR's LESS THAN 6 MONTHS OLD- . -- .
- ORGANIZATION SEP 90 OCT 90 NOV-90 LN00- :47- 40 54-
~ PED -34 35 39-Others 6 'S 9 tTotal 87- .80 112
-Adverse Trend: None L
o l lE -103-p I~ ( :.
1989 1990 SIGNIFICANT NRC OPPD SIGNIFICANT NRC OPPD CAR's VIOLATIONS LER'S CAR's CAR's VIOLATIONS LER'S SALP FUNCTIONAP. AREA' CAR's 8 2 55 (15) 0 1 9 A. Plant Operations 11- 0 28 (S) 2 0 0 B. Radiological Controls 30 1 2 1 8 6 4 C._ Maintenance / 140 " 2 10 174 (2) Surveillance D. Emergency 8 0 0 0 7 (1) 0 2 0 Preparedness 10 25 (1) 0 4 2 E. Security 26 2 6 , F. Engineering / 134 2 7 7 157 (26) 4 (1) 2 12 (1) ] Technical Support 0 22 (3) 0 0 0 G. Safety Assessment / 68 0 1
;, Quality o Verification l 0 0 0 !
l H. Other 0 0 0 1 1 Total 417 13 26 31 470 (54) 14 (1) 15 27 (1) l l CAR'S ISSUED VERSUS SIGNIFICANT CAR'S VERSUS NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED VERSU issued by the Nuclear The above matrix shows the number of Corrective Action Reports (CAR's) Services Division versus the number of Significant CAR's issued by the Nuclear Services Division issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for the Fort versus the number of violations Included in this table is the number of Licensee Event Reports Calhoun Ssation in 1989 and 1990. (LER's) identified by the station each year. The number of NRC violations reported are one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the violations. In November,1990, there were 54 CAR's issued, one Significant CAR issued, and one LER identified. During October zero NRC violations were issued. Thus no violations were attributable to personnel l ' error. The monthly distribution of CAR's, Significant CAR's, NRC violations, and LER's are shown in parentheses. ~ SEP 15, 20 & 21
SIGNIFICANT ITEMS OF INTEREST This section is intended to provide information on events which are significant to the Fort Calhoun Station and will give a " heads-up" look at what is scheduled in the coming months. The Procedure Upgrade Project and the Plant have approved and issued 811 safety related procedures. This meets a Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item Number 48 milestone commitment. The Electrical Distribution Safety System Functional Inspection is planned for March 1990. The inspection of the thermal shield was approved as a 1991 Refueling Outage task. As a result, the Refueling Outage length will be extended. The length of this extension is being determined.
-105-
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS . AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS This indicator tracks the total number of outstanding corrective non-outage Maintenance Work Orders at the Fort Calhoun Station versus their age in months. AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS This indicator is defined as the percentage of open, non outage, maintenance work orders that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total number of open, non-outage, maintenance work orders. AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSipE STATION LIMITS The cumulative hours that the Component Cooling Water system is outside the station chemistry limit. The hours are accumulated from the first sample exceeding the limit until additional sampling shows the parameter to be back within limits. CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE : The Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate and the industry check valve failure rate (failures per 1 million component hours). The data for the industry- failure rate is three months behind the Performance indicators
. Report reporting month. This indicator tracks performance fcr SEP item 43.
CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS The number cf planned classroom hours and the number of actual classroom hours for the Fort Calhoun. Station, CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT CVRRENT STATUS The-' number of Corrective Action Reports (CAR's) that- are older than 6 months and the= number ' of CAR's that are less than- 6 months old broken down by . organization' for the last 6 months. CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD The percentage of total outstanding corrective maintenance items, not-requiring an outage, that are greater than three months old at the end of the period reported. I
-106-
FORT CA'.H0VN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) CVMVLATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NON CITED VIOLATIONS (TWELVE-MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) The cumulative number of violations and Non Cited Violations for the last 12 months. DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The daily core thermal output as measured from computer point XC105 in thermal megawatts. DISABLING INJVRY FRE0VENCY RATE A 0ST TIME ACCIDENT RATE) This indicator is defined as the number of accidents for all utility personnel permanently assigned to the station, involving days away from work per 200,000 man-hours worked (100 man years). This does not include contractor personnel. This indicator tracks personnel performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item 26. DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (?S DEMANDS) The number of failures for each emergency diesel generator in the last 25 start demands and the last 25 load run demands. A trigger value of 4 failures in the last 25 demands is also shown. If any one diesel generator experiences 4 or more failures within the last 25 demands on the unit, the unit is defined as a problem emergency diesel generator and in Eccordance with NUMARC Initiative 5A, corrective actions must be taken.* A Standing Order will be drafted in February 1991 for the Fort Calhoun Station to institutionalize and formally approve / adopt the required actions. Number of Start Demands-All valid and inadvertent start demands, including all start-only demands and all start demands that are followed by load-run demands, whether by automatic or manual initiation. A start-only demand is a demand in which the emergency generator is started, but no attempt is made to load the generator.. Number of Start Failures Any failure within the emergency generator system that prevents the generator from achieving specified frequency and voltage is classified as a valid start failure. This includes any condition identified in the course of. maintenance inspections (with the emergency generator in standby mode) that definitely would have.resulted in a start failure if a demand had occurred. Number of Load-Run Demands For a valid load-run demand to be counted the load run attempt must meet one or more of the following; A load-run of any duration that results from a real automatic or manual initiation.
-107-
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) 01ESEL GENERATOR REl1 ABILITY (25 DEMANDS) (CONTINVED)
- A load-run test to satisfy the plant's load and duration as stated in the test specifications. - Other special tests in which the emergency generator is expected to be operated for at least one hour while loaded with at least 50% of its design load.
Number of Load-Run Failures A load-run failure should be counted for any reason in which the emergency generator does not pick up load and run as predicted. Failures are counted during any valid load run demands. Exceptions Unsuccessful attempts to start or load-run should not be counted as valid demands or. failures when they can be attributed to any of the l following; 1 Spurious trips that would be bypassed in the event of an emergency.
- Malfunction of equipment that is not required during an emergency.
Intentional termination of a test because of abnormal conditions that would not have resulted in major diesel generator riamage or repair.
- Malfunctions or operating errors which would have not prevented the emergency generator from being restarted and brought to load within a few m'.nutes. - A failure to start because a portion of the starting system was disabled for test purpose, if followed by a successful start with the starting system in its normal. alignment.
Each emergency generator failure that results in the generator being declared inoperable should be counted as one demand and one failure, Exploratory tests during corrective- maintenance and the successful test titat follows repair to verify operability should not be counted as demands or failures when the EDG has not been declared operable again, h
- Problem emergency diesel generator actions include:
(1) Determine the root cause of each new failure. (2) Review applicable past failures. l (3) Evaluate the corrective maintenance tracking history. l (4) Assess actual failure history against critical review elements. ! (5) Perform corrective Actions.
-108-l
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINVED) DIESEL GENERATOR REllABILITY (25 DEMANDS 1 (CONTINUED)
- Problem diesel generator actions (continued)
Following completion of corrective actions, restored performance of the problem diesel generator should be demonstrated by conducting seven consecutive failure free start and load-run tests (at a frequency of no less than 24 haurs and of no more than seven days between each demand). All starts and load-runs performed during this period should be included in the unit diesel generator reliability data so long as the diesel generator is operable. This process of evaluating recent demands and taking appropriate action on the individual diesel generator experiencing recurring failures is a key element in providing reasonable assurance that diesel generator performance is restored to an acceptable level. DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAll The Document Review Indicator shows the number of documents reviewed during the reporting month, the number of documents scheduled for review during the reporting month, and the number of document reviews that are overdue. This indicator tracks performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Reference Number 46. EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABitITY The number of failures that were reported during the last 20, 50, and 100 emergency diesel generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also shown are trigger values which correlate to a high level of confidence that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when the failure values are below the trigger values. Number of Start Demands All valid and inadvertent start demands, including all start-only demands and all start demands that are followed by load-run demands, whether by automatic or manual initiation. A start-only demand is a demand in which the emergency generator is started, but no attempt is made to load the generator. Number of Start Failures Any f611ure within the emergency generator system that prevents the generator from achieving specified frequency and voltage is classified as a valid start failure. This includes any condition identified in the course of maintenance inspections (with the emergency generator in standby mode) that definitely would have resulted in a start failure if a - demand had occurred.
-109-
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS-(CONTINUED) DiERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT REllABillTY (CONTINUED) Number of Load-Run Demands- ! for a valid load run demand to be counted the load-run attempt must meet one or more of the following;
- A load-run of' any duration that results from a real automatic or manual initiation.
A load-run test to- satisfy the plant's load and duration. as stated in the test specifications. 4 Other special tests in which the emergency generator- is expected to - be operated for at least one hour while loaded with at least 50% of , its- design load.
-Number of Load-Run Failures - --
L A load-run failure should be counted for any reason in which the-emergency: generator does not pick up load and run as predicted. Failures are counted during any valid-load-run demands. Exceptions: _ _
' Unsuccessful attempts to start or load-run should not be counted as valid demands : or failures when they can be : attributed to any. of the
- following; Spurious trips that would be bypassed.in the event of an emergency.-
Malfunction of equipment that is not required during an emergency. Intentional termination of a test because- of abnormal- conditions that iwould not haveL resulted -in' major diesel generator; damage or. repair. Malfunctions or operating errors -which.would 'have6not- prevented the 4 . , emergency - generator from- being restarted . and brought to- load within-a:few minutes. .r
-- t = A 4 failure 1.to start" becauseS a portion of the starting system 'was-disabledL for : test, purpose Sif followed by a successfu1M start with.-
the starting system in its. normal 1 alignment.
;-Each ! emergencyf generator - failure that1 results. in the generator- being-
~ declared inoperable < should .be i counted i as one -demand and one failure.
Exploratory tests duringicorrective~ maintenances and the successful- test thatc followsc repairi toL verifyr operabilityL should not be counted as. demands ors fail _ures when -the EDG has not .been declared operable _ again.-
-110-P
___U__m
- - - ... .- .- -- , ..~ - - ~ . . - . - .
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) BREAK 00WN The breakdown of the total number of open ECN's, the number of ECN's that were- opened during the reporting month, the number of ECN's that were completed during the reporting month, and the number of ECN's received during the- reporting month into three categories. These categories include; 1) document changes are required to complete the ECN's, 2) substitute or replacement items are required to complete the ECN's, or 3) facility changes are required to complete the ECN's. This indicator tracks performance for SEP item 62. ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS
' The number of ECN's that remain open at the end of the reporting month, the number of ECN's that were opened during the reporting month, and the number of: ECN's that: are completed during the reporting month. This 1 indicator tracks performance for SEP item 62.
E0VIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS ; Equipment forced outages. per 1000_ critical' hours is the inverse of- the mean time between : forced outages caused by equipment failures. The mean t'ime is equal _ to the number of hours the reactor is critical in a period (1000 hours) divided by the number of forced outages caused by equipment failures in that. period, E0VIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR This' indicator is defined as the ratio of _ gross available generation to gross-maximum generation, expressed as a percentage. Available generation is the energy that can be produced if the_ unit-is operated at the maximum _ power -level- permitted by equipment ;and regulatory limitations. Maximum generation _is the-energy that can be produced by a unit.in-a given period-if operated l continuously at maximum-capacity. EXPEDITED PURCHASES The percentage -of expedited purchases which occurred during the reporting month compared to the total number of purchase orders generated. FORCED 0UTAGE RALE This indicator JisLdefined -as the percentage ofL time : that the : unit was : unavailable due to' forced events compared to :the time - planned - for- - electrical generation. _ Forced events are failures or other unplanned conditions- that- require removing the unit from service before the;end of
-the next ? weekend. Forced events.-include startup failures? and' events initiated while the H unit is in reserve shutdown (i.e., the . unit is available but not in ~ service, c
-111-
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR This . indicator is defined as the steady-state primary coolant 1-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contribution and normalized to a common purification rate. Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposited on reactor core internals from previous defective fuel or is present on the surface of fuel elements from the manufacturing process. Steady state is defined as continuous operations above 85 percent power for at least seven days. This INP0 indicator uses an industry normalized letdown purification rate. The FRI has also been calculated using Fort Calhoun's actual letdown purification rate. These calculations revealed that the 'use of the plant's actual rate would result in an approximate 45% increase in FR1 data. GASEOUS RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE EMVIRONMENT This indicator displays the total number of Curies of all gaseous radioactive nuclides released from the Fort Calhoun Station, GROSS HEAT RATE Gross heat rate is defined as the ratio of total thermal energy in British ~ Thermal Units (BTV) produced by the reactor to the total gross electrical energy produced by the generator in kilowatt-hours (KWH). HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED The total amount (in Kilograms) of non halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced by the Fort Calhoun Station each month. HOTLINES The number of Hotlines that are initiated, closed, overdue, and_ open for a given month. A Hotline is a training document sent out for immediate review.. The Hotline should be reviewed and signed within 5 days of receipt of the Hotline. HOURS CflEMISTRY IS OUTSIDE OWNERS GROUP GUIDELINES Total hours for 13 secondary side chemistry parameters exceeding guidelines during power operation. Power operation is defined as greater than 30% power. The 13 parameters tracked are steam generator pH, cation , conductivity, boron silica, chloride, sul fate, sodium, feed water pH, l dissolved oxygen, hydrazine, iron, copper, and condensate pump discharge ' dissolved oxygen. i 1
-112-1
j
. i r* -
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINVEO) IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-0F-SERVICE Tota 14 number of in line chemistry instruments that are out of-service -in
.the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS).
INVENTORY ACCURACY The percentage of line items that are counted each month by the warehouse- ,
- which need count adjustments.
INVOICE BREAKDOWN. . The : number of invoices that are on hold due to shelf life, CQE, and-- miscellaneous reasons. LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS This indicatorL shows'theinumber of SR0 and/or R0 quizzes and exams that are administered and= passed 'each month. The License Candidate Exams Indicator) tracks Training performance for Safety Enhancement Program 11 tem j
- Number 68.
i LIOUID~ RADIOACTIVE WASTE- BEING OISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT' ; This1 indicator- displays- the volume of liquid: radioactive waste released
- from the radioactive waste monitorEtanks. The curies- from- all releases from the Fort Calhoun-Station to the Missouri River are also shown.
LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE-INCIDENTS (SECVRITYF
'The-: total number of security' incidents :-for the reporting month 7 This
-indicator tracks _ security performance for -Safety Enhancement Program. Iten
-Number 58. 1 y
MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENE$1 m' The1. number of Nuclear 1Planti Reliability: Data > System (NPRDS)- components-4
-withs more than one failure and : the number of NPRDS -components with 'more .
than two failures during-the last twelve monthsi
" MAINTENANCE: WORK ORDER BACKLOGg The number sof T corr'ective lnon-outage -maintenance work orders.- that remain--
?h nopeniati the end' of the ~. reporting month This indicatort was added to the. < Performance Indicators: Report; to . trend openi corrective 'non-outage tr maintenance 1 work. orders as = stated 'inL Safety Enhancement Program -(SEP)
-Item No.-'36.
t
=-113-
,4 4g4 -
-e - , -
._ m - ~ .. m.__ . _ _ . _ - _ . - _ _ _ . _._-._ _ ___ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN
- This indicator i s a breakdown of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders by several categories that remain open at the end of the reporting month, tjAINTENANCE OVERTIME The percentage of overtime hours ccmpared to normal hours for maintenance.
This includes OPPD personnel as weil as contract personnel. MATERIAL- RE0 VEST PLANNING The. percent- of material requests (MR's) for issues-with their request date the same as.their.need date compared to the total number of MR's. MATERIAL RE0 VESTS AWAITING APPROVAL The number _of_ - material requests awaiting approval at the end of the reporting month broken down by their age-in days. MAXIMUM-INDIVIDVAL RADIATION EXPOSURE
- The -total- maximum amount of Gamma: Land Neutron _ (Whole Body) radiation received- by an individualt person working' at- the Fort Calhoun Station on a monthly, ' quarterly, and annual basis.
- MWO-OVERALL' STATUS-(1991 REFUELING'0VTAGE)
The- total number- of- Maintenance, Work Orders -(MW0's) that have_ been written forScompletion during the- 1991-- Refueling Outage. MW0's which are written after. ; the start --of the- Refueling-_0utage1 will be labeled ' Emergent MW0's.
-This: indicator trt.cks performance for~SEP Reference Number 31.
NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS-sTheS number of 7 radiologicalc hot- spots which have -beenDidentified and documented i to exists at - the- Fort Calhoun: Station < at the4 end of. the reporting month. AL hot spotiis a small-localized source of- radiation. A-ihotispot occurs when the contact dose- rate. of an item ~is at -least 5: times L theiGenerall Area dose' rate :and the- item's - dose rate _ is equal to Lor L greater than 100 mrem / hour; NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABillTY DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURE REPORTS SUBMITTEDi i eThe ' data - plotted _is - the total - number 11 of - NPRDS1 componente failures !- -(confirmed and . possible) - and the' number of- confirmed NPRDS _ component L failures.- The total . number of NPRDS componenti failures are : based on -the L
= number ofsfailure reports'that have;been sent to the-Institute of- Nuclear Operations ((INPO). _
L
-114-
FORT CALH0VH PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT REllABILITY DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURE REPORTS SE MITTED (CONilNUED) Confirmed NPRDS component failures are based upon failure reports that have been accepted by INP0. Possible NPRDS component failures are based upon failure reports that are still under review by INP0. NPRDS is the Nuchar Plant Reliability Data System, and is a utility industry users group prcgram which has been outlined by INPO and implemented at the fort Calhnun Station. NUMBER OF OUT-0F-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM ll{STRUMENTS A control room instrument that cannot perform its design function is considered as out-of-service. A control room instrument which has had a Maintenance Work Order (MWO) written for it and has not been repaired by the end of the reporting period is considered out-of-service and will be counted. The duration of the out-of-service condition is not considered. Computer CRTs are not considered as control room instruments. NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) attributed to personnel error ! on the original LER submittal. This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP Item No. 15. NUMBER OF MISSED SVRVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS The number of Surveillance Tests (ST's) that result in Licensee Event Reports (LER's) during the reporting. This indicator tracks missed ST's for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item Numbers 60 and 61. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE B'JAQf]. The year to date budget compared to the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance. 0QTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator displays the total number of outstanding Corrective Actioa Reports (CAR's), the number of CAR's that are older than six months and the number of modification related CAR's. OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE RE0 VESTS (EAR's) The total number of open EAR's and the number of open EAR's broken down by their age in months. This indicator tracks performance for SEP ltem 62.
-115-I
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) OUTSTANDING MODIFICAT10M The number of Modification Requests (MR'S) in any state between the issuance of a Modification Number and the comple1. ion of the drawing update. Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress The Form FC-1133 has not been plant apnroved. Modification Requests Being Reviewed This category includes: 1,)
- Modification Requests that are hot yet reviewed 2.)
- Modification Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear Projects Review Committ o (NPRC) 3.)
- Modification Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC)
- These Modification Requests may be reviewed several times before they are approved for accomplishment or cancelled. Some of these Modification Requests are returned to Engineering for more information, some approved for evaluation, some approved for study, and scme approved for planning. Once planning is completed and the scope of the work is clearly defined, these Modification Requests may be approved for accomplishment with a year assigned for construction or they may be cancelled. All of these different phases require review.
Design Engineering Backlog /In Progress Nuclear Planning has assigned a year in which construction will be completed and design work may be in progress. Construction Backlog /In Progress - The Construction Package has been issued or construction has begun but' the modification has not been accepted by the System Acceptance Committee (SAC). Design Engineering Update Backlog /In Progress PED has received the Modification Completion Report but the drawings have not been updated.
-116-
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUE 0) DyfRALL PROJECT STATUS (199 LBffMEL[NG OUTAGE) > The number of projects which affect the scope of the 1991 Refueling Outage. Also shown' is the number of projects in which their preli.ninary schedules have been submitted. This indicatcr tracks performance for SEP Reference Number 31. QyERDUE AND EXTENDEQ CORRECTIVE ACTION __3f. PORTS The number of_ overdue Corrective Action Reports (CAR's) and the i. umber of. CAR's which received extensions broken down ,by organization for the last 6 months. PERCENT ,Qf COMPLf.TED SCHE 0l! LED fBINTENANCE ACTIVITIES .._ The percent of the nunber of completed r.aintenance activities as compared
~ to the number of: scheduled maintenance activities each week. This percent ,
is shown for each craft. Maintenance activities include MVR's, IN0's, ST's, PM0's, calibrations, and other miscellaneous activities. These indicators track Maintenance performance for SFP Reference Number 33.
.P.ERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)
Collective radiation exposure is the _ total external whole-body dose received by - all1on site personnel (including contractors ard visitors)
-during a time period, as measured by the thermoluminescent dosimete-(TLD). Collective radiation exposure -is reported in units of man rem.
This i nd i c ator -' tracks radiological wo;k performance - *or Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item Number 54. PERSONNEL TURNOVER' RATE Th.i ratio > of- the number of turnovers to average employment. A turnover is L a vacancy created by . voluntary resignation from the company. Retiremnt, death, etermination,: transfers within_ the company, and--part-time snployees are'not considered-in turnover.
-PAEVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVE8QUE This Lindicator -is= defined as. the = percentage of : preventive ; maintenance items._in :the month: that were not completed by the- scheduled 'date plus: a grace ;: period. . equal: to 25 percent' of the scheduled :: interval. ~ This indicator tracks preventive maintenanco activities .for... Safety Enhancemint,
- ProgramL(SEP) Item Number 41'.
PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY: PERCENT 0F HOURS OUT OF-LIMII Ther percent of . hours out of limit are for _ s ix- primary chemistry parameters divided by the total: number -of hours possible for tne month.
-The : key 4 parameters used are: Lithium,- Chloride, . Hydrogen, Dissolved L0xygen, . Fluoride, and Suspended Solids, EPRI limits are used, i
I L -117-l l L ~ . .
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEf 2 NIT 10NS (CONTINUED) Eh0rIDUp fg@l4l_A_!ltE INC1 DENTS 1(t/tRllMNfD M.e amber cW ios 'ified incidents concerning maintenance procedural problems, the nunb e of closed IR'c related to the use of procedures
'ixicJuv tie number cf closed IR's caused by procedural noncompliance),
a6 thr number sf clo3ed procedural noncompliance M's. This indicator t4e Ms personnel perforsance for SEP ltem Numbers 15 and 41. nROGRESS Of 1991 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNUG The number of modifications approved for planning (to determine feasibility) for completion during the 1991 Refueling. This indicator tracks perf0'mance for SEP Reference Number 31. C 1 RADIOLJGICAL CORK _ PRACTICES PROGRAM 1 The number of identified poor radiological work practicos (PRWP) for the b reporting month. This it.Oicator tracks radiological work performance for Shfety Eahancement (SEP) Item Number 52. RATIO 07 ?P,EVINTIVE 7.,_ 0 TOTAL HAINTENANCE i The ratio of preventb e maintenance (including surveillarce testino and calibradon procedures) to the sum of non-outage corrsttiso naintm.rste and preventive maintenance completed over the reporting period. ihe ratio, expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on man-nours. This indicato- tracks preventive maintenance activities for Safety Enhancement i Program (Sf.) Iten tiumber 41. R.LCSRM_1pJURY CASES FRE0VENCY PME (RECQRDABLE INdufY RATFJ The number of ' injuries requiring more the normal first aid per 200,000 manhours worked. (his indicator trends personnel performance for SEP ltem No. 15 and SEP Item 26. 1Q_J ICENSE EhMDIATION PASS RATIO The R0 license exw ination pass ratio for NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GF E 's ) ., NRC admir.istered Site Specific Exams, NRC administered license requallitcation exams, and OPPD administered license requalification exams. This ind'itator trads Training performance for Safety Enhancement Program item Number 69. ECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMTJ1RY E[RFORMt L])fg1 The Chemistry Perfor. nance index , CPI) is a calculation based on the , concentration of key impurities in the secondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the mcst Mkely cause of deterioration of the steam generators. The chemf stry paremet 3rs are reported only for the period of time greater than 30 percent power.
-118-l
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAlETER DEF!NITIONS (CONTINUED) SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMI$TRY PERFORMANCE INDEX (CONTINUFJ)] , The following equation is how the CPI is calculated: CPI -((Ka/0.8) + (Na/20) + (02 /10)) / 3 Where the following ?arameters are monthly averages of; Ka average a' lowdown cation conductivity Ha = average blowdown sodium concentration 02 = average condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen concentration SECURITY INCIDQili,ML@B This indicator shows a percentile breakdown of the types of Security incidents for the reporting month. Ihe following items are the types of Security incidents represented ! in this indicator.- l LicenseeDesignatedVehicles(LDV's) Incidents related to the use of LOV's, e.g. keys left in the vehicle, loss of keys, or f611ure to return keys. Security Badges incidents involving lostonattended badges, badges removed from site, or failure to wear badges. Escorting Incidents involving escort responsibilitics, e.g.. improper ! control or escort of a visiter (s). Security System Failures Incidents involving alarm system failures, CCTV failures, security com) uter failures, terminal failures, door equipment failures, anc card reader failures. Security Key Control i incidents involving Security key control, e.g. lost Security
. keys. Security keys removed from' site, or failure to return ,
Security. keys. This type of incident does not reflect incidents i concerning LOV keys. !
-119-I
._______.._......_...__._._...l
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PAMMETER DEFINlTIONS (CONTINUED) E(&BITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN (CONTINUED) Access Control Incidents involving the inspection and control of personnel, packages, and vehicles, e.g. failure to properly search personnel, packages, and vehicles. This item also includes the introduction of Lontraband or prohibited items into the Protected Area, or the attempted introduction of such items. This indicator tracks security performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item N nber 58. ECURITY SYST EM FAILV.'tES Incidents involving alarm system failures, CCTV failures, security computer failures, and card reader failures. Alarm system failures and CCTV failures are further categorized as iollows: Alarm System f ailure Detection system events involving false / nuisance alarms and mechanical failures. Alarm Systen Environmental failures - Degradations to detection system performance as a result of environmental conditions (i.e., rain, snow, frost). CCTV Failures - Mechanical failures to all CCTV hardware components. CCTV Environmental failures - Degradations to CCTV performance as a result of environmental conditions (i.e., rain, snow, frost, fog, sunspots, shade). In the future, a single environmental event which causes multiple failures to the alarm system and/or CCTV system will be logged as one event (i.e., a rain storm which causes multiple alarm system failures, the sun ris'ng which degrades multiple CCTV performance).
. SPARE PARTS ISSVED The dollar value of the saare parts issued for the Fort Calhoun Station during the reporting perioc.
SRO OPERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO The SR0 license examination pass ratio for NRC admin .tered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), NRC administered Site Specific Exams, NRC administered license 'requalification exams, and OPPD Hministered license requalification exams. This indicator tracks Trainirs performance for Safety Enhancement Program item Number 68. l
-120-
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) STAFF 1M LEVEL The actual staffing level and the author 9ed staffing level for the Nuclear Operations Division, the Production Engic*ering Division, and the Nuclear Services Division. STATION NET GENERATIDH The net generation (sum) produced by the Fort Calhoun Station during the reporting month. STOCK 0VT RATE The total number of Pick Tickets that were generated during the reporting month and the total number of Pick Tickets that were generated during the reporting month with no parts available. TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS The number of temporary mechanical and electrical configurations to the plant's systems. Temporary- configurations are defined as electrical jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical jumpers, or mechanical blocks which are installed in the plant operating systems and are not shown on the latest revision of the P&lD, schematic, connection, wirir.g, or flow diagrams. Jumpers and blocks which are installed for Surveillance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures, or Operating Procedures are not considered as temporary mcdifications unless the jumper or block remains in olace after the test or procedure is , complete. Jumpers and blocks installed in test or lab instruments are not ' considered as temporary modifications. Scaffolding is not considered a tem)orary modification. Jumpers and blocks.which are installed and for whict EEAR's have been submitted, will be considered as a temporary modifications until final resolution of the EEAR and the jumper or block is removed or is permanently recorded on the drawings. This indicator tracks temporary modifications for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item Number 62 & 71. JDIAktl0'JRS OF STUDENT TRAINING The ~ total number of student hours of training for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General- - Employee Training, -and Other training conducted for the Fort - Calhoun Station. 4
-121 -
.__________-_____a
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEflNITIONS (CONTINUED) 4 10TAL SKIN AND CLOTHINC, CONTAMlfL4J1QM Reportable skin and clothing contaminations above background levels ' greater than 5000 dpm/100 cm squared. This indicator trends parsonnel performance for SEP ltem No. 15. UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL ; 1 This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned attomatic scrams (reactor protection system logic actuations) that occur wMle the reactor is critical. The indicator is further defined as follows: Unplanned means that the scram was not part of a planned test l or evolution. Scram means the automatic shutdown of the reactor by a rapid insertion of all control rods that is caused by actuation of the reactor protection system. The scram signal may have resulted from exceeding a setpoint or may have been spurious. Automatic means that the initial signal that caused actuation of the reactor protection system logic was provided from one of the sensors monitoring plant parameters and conditions, rather than the manual scram switches (or pushbuttons) in the main control roca. Critical means that during the steady state condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the effective multiplication facto" (kerf) was equal to one. UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - flNPO DEFINITION) This indicator is defined as the sum of the following safety systtm actuations: the number of unplanned Emergency Core Cooling System (ECC.c.) actuations that result from reaching an ECCS actuation setpo',nt or from a spurious / inadvertent ECCS signal the number of unplanned emergency AC power system actuatim. that result from a loss of power to a safeguards bus An unplanned safety system actuation occurs when an actuation setpaint for a safety system is reached or when a spurious or inadvertent signal is generated (ECCS only), and major equipment in the system is actuated. Unplanned means that the system actuatie was not part of a planned test or evolution. The ECCS actuations to be counted are actuations of the high pressure injection system, the low pre sure injection system, or the safety injection tanks. l \ 122-l l
4 FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEilNITIONS (CONTINUED) W PLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (NRC DEFINITION) The number of safety system actuations which include (oniv) the High Pressure Safety injection System, the Low Pressure Safety injection System, the Safety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classification of safety system actuations includes actuations when major equipment is operated an.d n when the logic systems for the above sa'aty systems are challenged. VIOLATIONS pER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator is defined as the number of violations sited in NRC inspection reports for the Fort CalhiJn Station per 1000 NRC inspection hours. The violations are reported in the year that the inspection was actually performed and not based on when the inspection report is received. The hours reported for each inspection report are used as the inspection hours, yf VME OF LOW LEVEL SOLIO RADIDACTIVE WASTE This indicator is defined as the volume of low level solid radioactive waste actually shipped for disposal. This indicator also shows the volume of low level radioactive waste which is in temporary storage. Low level solid radioactive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance. Dry active waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other material to be disposed of at a low level radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low level refers to all radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by product of spent fuel processing. This indicator tracks radiological work performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item Number 54. WAREHOUSE ISSUES The total number of warehouse issues, the number of non-CQE stock issues, the number of CQE stock issues, the number of direct charge non-CQE issues, and the number of direct charge CQE issues which occurred during the reporting month. 123- . l 1 J
4 l . FORT Ctt.HOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS The total number of warehouse receipts, the number of non CQE stock receipts, the number of CQE stock receipts, the number of direct charge non-CQE receipts, and the number of direct charge CQE receipts which occurred during the reporting month. WAREHOUSE _ R.1T,ygts The percentage of the total number of warehouse returns, the number r,f spare parts returns, the number of standaro stores returns, and the number of direct charge returns compared to the total number of warehouse issues. , il
-124-N- -
. BASIS FOR ESTA}LISHING 1990 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR GOAL $
This section will expla n the basis used in establishing the 1990 , performance goals. FORCED OUT6GE RATE AND E0VIVALENT AVAILABillTY FACTOR The Forced Outage Rate (FOR) and Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF) goals have been established from 1990 to 1992. The followlng table is a breakdown of the hours allotted for each category over the next three years. STARTUP
- GENERATOR FORCED OUTAGE PLANNLD ON LINE OUTAGE TIME OUTAGE PERIOD EAF FOR Xfl8 (HOUR $1 (HOURS) (HOURS) (HOURS)- Di@B.$1 $1 $1 1990(*) 6356 168 172 2064 8760 65.4 2.4 1991(*) 6956 168 172 1464 8760 75.9 2.3 1992 8520 240 0 0 8760 92.9 2.7-(*)'RefuelingOutageYears UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL The 1990 goal for Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical has been set at one. The Fort Calhoun Station has had one unplanned automatic reactor scram in the past four years of operation.
UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS The Unplanned Safety System Actuations goal for 1990 has been established
,- at zero. The Fort Calhoun Station did not have an unplanned safety system ,
actuation for six years. !
-GROSS HEAT RATE The 1990 Gross Heat Rate goal for the Fort Calhoun Station has been set at 10,200 BTU /KWH. This heat rate goal is based on 10,435 BTU /KWH for the month of January, 10,450 BTU /KWH for the month of February, 10,325-BTU /KWH for the month of Msy, 10,225 BTV/KWH for the month of June, 10,325 BTV/KWH for the month of July, '10,250 BTU /KWH for the month of
' August,10,125. BTU /KWH for the month of September,10,050 BTV/KWH for the month of October,10,000 BTV/KWH for the month of November, and 9,975 BTU /KWH-for the month of December.
-125-
ItAslS FOR ESTABLISHING 1990_ PERFORMANCE INDICATOR GOALS . (CONTINUED) [ VEL REllABILITY INDi;ATOR The 1990 Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRl) goal has been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram. This level allows for approximately one to two fuel pin f ailures. Although Cycle 11 was completed without any apparent fuel pin f ailures, there are a number of Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation (ANF) assemblies entering into a third or fourth cycle of operation. When c fuel pin has been used for three or four fuel cycles there is an increased probability of fuel failure. The failed Fuel Action Plan, Standing Order 0 43, allows for approximately four fuel pin failures prior to implementing any increased action levels. E[RSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIV[] The 1990 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) goal is 287 man rem. This goal was based on 234 man rem of cumulative exposure for the 1990 Refueling Outage and approximately 5.9 man rem of cumulative exposure for each non-outage month. VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIDACTIVE WASTE The 1990 Volume of low level Solid Radioactive Waste goal is 5,000 cubic feet. This goal was based on a recommendation made by the Fort Calhoun ALARA Committee and approved by the Division Manager of the Nuclear Production Division. DISABLING INJURY FRE0VENCY RATE The Disabling injury Frequency Rate 1990 goal has been set at 0.31. This goal allows for one lost time accident in the Nuclear Production Division during 1990. 126-
L l t FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES l 1 ) PRODUCTION CUMULATIVE ] EVENT FROM - TO (MWH) (MWH) [ Cycle 1 09/26/73 02/01/75 3,299,639 3,299,639 First Refueling 02/01/75 - 05/09/75 Cycle 2 05/09/75 10/01/76 3,853,322 7,152,961 [ Second Refueling 10/01/76 - 12/13/76 Cycle 3 12/13/76 - 09/30/77 2,805,927 9,958,888 Third Refueling 09/30/77 - 12/09/77 l ' Cycle 4 12/09/77 10/14/78 3,026,832 12,985,720 ! Fourth' Refueling 10/14/78 - 12/24/78 ! Cycle 5~ 12/24/78-- 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454
]
fifth Refueling 01/18/80 - 06/11/80
^
Cycle 6 06/11/80 - 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 Sixth Refueling. 09/18/81 - 12/21/81 Cycle 7 12/21/81 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 Seventh Refueling 12/06/82 04/07/83 Cycle 8 04/07/83 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 4 Eighth. Refueling 03/03/84 07/12/84 . Cycle 9 07/12/84 - 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893-Ninth Refeeling '09/28/85 - 01/16/86 Cycle 10 01/16/86 -03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 Tenth Refueling 03/07/87 - 06/08/87 - Cycle 11 06/08/87 09/27/88. 4,936,859 41,771,505 1 Eleventh Refueling _ 09/27/88 - 01/31/89 Cycle 12 .01/31/89 - 02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 Twelfth Refueling 02/17/90 - 05/29/90
-127-E p
- ....-.a . - ..- - - ... _ .,. . - . - . = .- -. - - .
4 FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUEllNG OUTAGE DATES (CONTINUED) PRODUCTION CVMULATIVE EVENT FROM - TO (MWH) (MWH) Cycle 13 05/29/90 - 09/28/91* Thirteenth Refueling 09/28/91* 11/22/91* Cycle 14 11/22/91*- 02/12/93* Fourteenth Refueling 02/12/93* 05/06/93* Cycle 15 05/06/93*- 09/30/94* Fifteenth Refueling 09/30/94*- 11,'26/94* t
* - Planned Dates
-128-
FORT CALHOUN STATION PRODUCTION AND OPERATION RECOPDS The following seven items are the current production and operation
- records" for the Fort Calhoun Station.
- 1. First Sustained Reaction. . . . . . . . . . . . . August 5, 1973 (5:47 p.m.)
- 2. First Electricity Supplied to the System. . . . . August 25, 1973
- 3. Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH). . . . . . . . September 26, 1973
- 4. Achieved Full Power (100%) . . . . . . . . . . . . May 4,1974
- 5. Longest Run (477 days). . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 8, 1987 - Sept. 27,1988
- 6. Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468,800-KWH). October 1987
- 7. Most Productive Fuel Cycle (4,936,859 MWH). . . . June 8, 1987 Sept. 27, 1988 (Cycle 11) 129-
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCES EfRFORMANCE INDICATOR MANAGER /lNDIVIDUAL Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders Patterson/Schmitz Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts Patterson/ CHAMPS Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits Franco /Glantz CAR's Current Status Orr/Gurtis CAR's issued Versus NRC Violations issued Chase /Simmons Orr/Gurtis Classroom (Instructor) Hours Gasper /Newhouse Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old Patterson/Schmitz Cumulative Violations and NCV's Chase /Simmons Daily Thermal Output Holthaus/ Gray Decontaminated Auxiliary Building Patterson/Gundal Diesel Generator Reliability (25 Demands) DG Log Diesel Generator Unit Reliability DG Log Disabling injury Frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs Document Review Patterson/McKay Engineering Change Notice Breakdown Phelps/Bera Engineering Change Notice Status Phelps/Bera Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours Holthaus/ Gray Equivalenc Availability Factor Dietz/Kulisek Expedited Put Caases Willrett/Fraser Forced Outage Rate Holthaus/ Gray Fuel Reliability Inuicator Holthaus/Lofshult Gaseous Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Franco /Stultz Gross Heat Rate Holthaus/ Gray Hazardous Waste Produced Patterson/Sayre 130- l
o PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINVED) Hotlines Casper /Newhouse In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of Service Patterson/Renaud inventory Accuracy W111 rett /Fussell invoice Breakdown Willrett/Fussell License Candidate Exams Gasper / Lazar Liquid Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Franco /Stultz Loggable/ Reportable Security Incidents Sefick/Woerner Maintenance Effectiveness Jaworski/ Dowdy Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non Outage) Patterson/Schmitz Maintenance Work Order Breakdown Patterson/Schmitz Maintenance Overtime Patterson/Schmitz Material Request Planning W111 rett /Fussell Material Requests Awaiting Approval Willrett/Fraser Maxirum Individual Radiation Exposure Patterson/Mattice MWO Overall Status (1991 Refueling Outage) Patterson/ Hyde Number of Hot Spots Patterson/Mattice Number of NPRDS Reportable Failures Jaworski/ Dowdy Number of Out-of-Service Control Ronm Instruments Patterson/ Adams Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LER's Chase /Simmons Number of Missed ST's Resulting in LER's Plant LER's Operations and Maintenance Budget Gleason/ Parent Outstanding CAR's Orr/G"rtis Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR's) Jaworski/ Van Osdel Outstanding Modifications Jaworski/ Turner
-131-l
.om
O PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINULD) Overall Project Status (1991 Refueling Outage) Patterson/ Hyde Overdue and Extended CAR's Orr/Gurtis Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities Peterson/Schmitz Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) Patterson/Mattice Personnel Turnover Rate Sorenson/ Burke Preventive Maintenance items Overdue Patterson/ Linden Primary System Chemistry - Percent Hours Out of Limits Franco /Glantz Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) Patterson/McKay Progress of 1991 Outage Modification Planning Patterson/ Hyde Radiological Work Practices Program Patterson/Mattice Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance Patterson/Schmitz
)
Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs R0 License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper / Lazar Secondary System Chemistry Franco /Stultz Security incident Breakdown Sefick/Woerner Security System Failures Sefick/Woerner Spare Parts Inventory Value Steele/Huliska Spare Parts issued Steele/ Miser SRO License Examinatien Pass Rath Gasper / Lazar Staffing Level Sorenson/ Burke Stockout Rate Willrett/Fussell Temporary Hodifications Jaworski/ Turner Total Hours of Student Training Gasper /Newhouse Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations Patterson/Mattice Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical Plant LER's 132-i 1
l o PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA S'yACE . (CONTINUED) ) Unplanned Safety System Actuations (INPO) Plant LER's Unplanned Safety System Actuations (NRC) Plant LER's Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours Chase /Simmons l Volume of low level Solid Radioactive Waste Patterson/Breuer Warehouse Issues Willrett/Fussell Warehouse Receipts Willrett/Fussell Warehouse Returns Willrett/Fussell
-133-
O 1 REFERENCES < INPO Good Practices 0A 102, " Performance Monitoring - Management Information" INPO Report Dated November 1984,
- Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" NUMARC 87 00, " Guidelines and Technical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Station Blackout at Light Water Reactors", Revision 1.
Appendix D. "EDG Reliability Program", dated April 6,1990.
-134-
.}}