ML19329B904

From kanterella
Revision as of 16:21, 18 February 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
RO NP-33-77-12:on 770613,wind Speed Indicator at Elevation 827 Ft Above Sea Level Found Not Indicating Properly During Routine Meteorlogical Monitor Insp.Caused by Defective Bearings in Wind Speed Transmitter.Transmitter Replaced
ML19329B904
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 07/07/1977
From: Batch S, Lingenfelter J
TOLEDO EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML19329B837 List:
References
NUDOCS 8002060897
Download: ML19329B904 (2)


Text

.

~..

LICE.NSEE ' EVE!JT REPOR s s, coveriot stoca L.1 i ' i 1,

' 'f.'.':.' ' ' . c ~ s i ~.,. . . . ' 'N .~." < ,*J .~,'

$,10111 I DIB l S ill

}j_01-J010iNIPIPl-10131 a n1 4 1 lj ljl n i

lj pj m : :....t::

.......v , , . . . . . . . . ,,. . .... ...o.,o...

con 1 L l,g O  ! 5 t 0, ..; 0 ; 3 !4i 6 06 i1 3 7:7 i .id i 1 71 61 7!7 7 1

1]

t .t , o, tc .. ..o.. ~

g g During a routinc inspection and servicing of the Meteorologicdl Monitoring i as y

@]l System it was d,iscovered the wind speed indicator at Elevatiod 827 feet  ;

a es a level was not indicating procarly. This placed us into an

>lie]l,

, above ses ..

l

@ l Action Statement in Technical Specificatien 3.3.3.4. (NP-33-77-12) ]

8.L

, 3 i

@l89 80 $

) 68 1 fh!NI ~'

42 T T[ Ut 63 43 44

"} 4;

[*~

ag caust c,tsceirvios LBearings in the wind speed transmitter were found to be defective, and l

@ hhe wind speed transmitter was replaced. ]

e3 o EEDI i

\7 85 sc 1 O s eet a s t a tus u,SEONa v oeScovt av DESCnerf tC9 8 [eLB_J  ! d*!Ef0- 1 NA I (B_J N  :

e , , ,j,, ,, io o o .4 .. L.c A rt aer s e ve s , e r.*w s t n e

    • L ^D 08 a C a tt 6.ou% t or ac t ive t v LoCatoom O' .(Ltatt 7 8 s 1C

.I e e4 eb M

  • t '150NN1.L A vens e t atv.f PCivrt of t5 .e.t o.N
  • I
  • I

> o. .. ,. I.2 m PtR1cNN(ttNJUHf&$

m uw o r. a na sc aie r som *

[ NA

  • 8.'O!O!01

\ .. ,,

I OFFSitt C:seStOLJtNCES A g

  • ind
  • LOS$ Oft cananut to e ac1Lef v
  • evre og g e . ... .o, *

['D,qu

, g NA _ 3 _

futteC8,v .

81SSNA 3

y ADOst OM AL f ACIOfis *

  • PD. ', "^ -

. J 86 V ,,,,,, Jacque ungenfenedStan Smh (419} 259-5000, Ext.. 251 3002060 77,

4 s

, I TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY

/ DAVIS-BESSE UNIT ONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR LER NP-33-77-12 DATE OF EVENT: June 13, 1977 FACILITY: Davis-Besse Unit 1 IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE: The wind speed indicator at Elevation 827 feet above sea level was not indicating properly.

Conditions Prior to Occurrence: The plant was in Mode 5. Power: (MWE) 0, (MWT) 0 Description of Occurrence: At approximately 0930 hours0.0108 days <br />0.258 hours <br />0.00154 weeks <br />3.53865e-4 months <br /> on June 13, 1977 during weekly inspection of the Meteorological Monitoring System by station personnel ~,

it was discovered that the wind speed indiencor at 827 feet above sea level was not indicating properly. NUS, the firm responsible for maintenance on the tower, l was notified as to the nature of the occurrence. j Designation of Aeparent Cause of Occurrence: NUS found the bearings in the wind l

) speed indicator to be defective and replaced the entire unit with one that had  !

been previously tested and calibrated. The unit was replaced by 1400 hours0.0162 days <br />0.389 hours <br />0.00231 weeks <br />5.327e-4 months <br /> on l June 14, 1977, which restored proper indication and removed the station from the Action Statement of Technical Specification 3.3.3.4.

Analysis of occurrence: Since there was no radioactive release requiring meteoro-  ;

logical monitoring during the period that the unit was inoperable, no danger to the health and safety of the public or static.' personnel occurred.

l Corrective Action: The entire wind speed transmitter was replaced with a cali-brated and tested unit by NUS. This transmitter has been and will continue to be replaced by NUS on a regular basis at three month intervals. This incident is considered unique and would not usually occur because of the preventative main-tenance by NUS.

Failure Data: No previous similar events have occurred.

l l

l l

~~. .

I 1

~

i I

.. A .. .... . _ . . . . _ . . ._.

l