ML12355A782

SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page 141 of 561 - Page 183 of 561

ML12355A782
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	11/26/2012
From:	Miktus P A Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2266 SNCF164-RPT-01, Ver 1.0
Download: ML12355A782 (43)

Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 rA qj Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YN NE] Ui0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment (D No: QIHIINGR2504t, Equip; Class'pkg F141 EquipmentDescription RADIATION MONITOR PANEL Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor EL. 155 Room, Area ___Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results o f the Seismic Walkdown of an item Of equipiment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used toxrecord the results ofjudgments and findintgs.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting 6ther conanetits.

Anchorag I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2.. Is the, anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE NE] UE] N/AN YYO NE] UE] N/AR]4. Is the anchorage:free of visible:cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NEI UE] N/A0 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: Tthis question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuratidn verification is required.)

Reference U733260 V2 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NE] UE NIA0 YZ NE] UM Enier-flie equipnlentcdas ihale frohi AppcndixB:;

Classes 6f Eqbipinent.

Page 141 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0~171\Sheet 2 of 6 status: YG] Nn UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QHIH1NGR25041, Equip. Class- 20 Pka Fl-41 Equipment Description.

RADIATION MONITOR PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets freefro'm impact by nearby equipment orstructures?

YMJ NEI UE] NiAE 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO' NEI UE] N/AE3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No overhead items.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Visible Conduits adequately flexible.Also cabinet is very rigid.1:0. Based oh the. above seismic interaction evaluationsi, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NE1 UE1 N/A-Yg NE1 UE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Haye you looked for and found no other, seismic conditions thatcould adversely a ffect .the safety finctions of the equipment?

YZ Ni"UE]Corn ments Addi'tional pages may be added as necessary)

Cabinet adjacent (N-42).per D-175069 is< 3/4 "away, but adequately stiff to pose no, adverse seismic I/A concern, This package was originally signed on 8-214-2 but retyped for clarify on 10-15-12.Evaluated by: Yun by,,,Telecon

/vIi a Paul Miktus / J!Date: V-21/12 8k21/2 Page 142 of 561 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONP Page 143 of 561 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0<4 Page 144 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS I NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 1FI-,cY)II 76 Page 145 of 561 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS V NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION ,Tl Page 146 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Seismic.Walkdown Checklist (SWC), Sheeti of 14 StatuS: YN NRl ULI Equipment.ID No. QIHIINGSSP2506G Equip. Class ,206 Equipmeont Descrpntion SOLID STATE.,PROTECTION INPUT CABINET Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY FoorEl. 155, Room, Area 416 Mantufacturer., Modei, Etc. (optio6bal.btitiec6mmcnd&Id)

Instructions for. Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document:the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item. of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of tile, fklowing.questions maybe used to record the results of judgments and: findings.

Additional space, i§ pr6ovided itt the end.of.this§ cheekist for documenting otlier cofoments, Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL item s requiringsuh verficaion)?

YZ NO 2.. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that -is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y. ,NO UEIC YN NENi UF] N/AF-4-. Isthe anchorage free of visible-cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y NE]. Un N/AMI 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This questiobnonly Aippjies if the item is one of-tle.,50%

for which an anchorage configurationverification is required.).

Refer-ence SEWS'for'QIHI ING.SSP2506J dated 5/25/94 and 2506G: 5/25/94., Verified ahchorage.bqy.-puIling up carpet from front and back of QIHI1NSSP2506G, IH&4I.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchoragefree of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NE] UE] N/AE-Y[9 NE] UE1 DOE terthquj~imicnt class niame 660m Aflpendix.,B:

Classes ofEquipnient.

Page 147 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2of 14 Status- YO NEI Un Equipment ID No. QIHi INGSSP25O6G Equip. Class' 20 , Pkg FI-42 Eq-auipment Descrip ion SOLID STATE PROTECTION INPUT CABINET Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or-structures?

YZJ NEI iEI 1NIA 8. Are overhead equipment, distffibutiofi systems, deiling tiles and lightinf , NE Ui N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the.equipment?

9. DO attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage 10. Based on the above. seismic inteaction.eyiluations, is equipmenit free of potentially adverse'.seismic interaction effects?YZ NE UO N/AO YZ NO UE Other Adverse Conditions 1j. Have you.looked for and found no other seismic conditions thatcould adversely affect the safety fimetions of the equipment?, No Comments YGl NEI UE Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cabinet adjacent (N-42) per D-175069 is < 3/4" away, but adequately stiff to pose: no adverse seismic I/A concern.This package was originally signed on 8-21-12 but retyped for clarity on 10-15-12.Evaliaked .hv-PaukMiktus 2 Date- 8121112&21,112 Page 148 of 561 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 9 A-i r4A Page 149 of 561 9 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS is NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 150 of 561 CD 0 01I a?m z cn)m-I C/)z 0 Ci)z 7)0 m C/)0 z.

• ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIO*Page 152 of 561 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .10 4'Page 153 of 561 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONRO Page 154 of 561 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 155 of 561

• ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .0 Page 156 of 561 9IACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .V Page 157 of 561 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONO Page 158 of 561 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.00 Page 159 of 561 9 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 160 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sh$1ee-t 1 f statu'§: YLJ NO ~Seismic Walkdo Checklist (SWC)Equipmen lIDNo. Q1H21EO05-3.

Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description 4, 16KV SWITCHGEAR&

1G LOCAL CONT PANEL Location:

Bdg. AUXILIARY FloorEl. 12.1 Rkbm, Area -Manufacturer, Model, Etc. '(optional bit. recommiended)

InstructionsI for Completing Checklist.

This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an iem of equipment on the SWEL. The*spa. below each of the following questionsitmay be used to record ibe tesults of judgmrents and findings.

Additional spaceis provided atthe end of this checklist fordocumenting other domments., 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required'(i.e., is theitem one Y96 ND of0ile kd%of SWEL items requii'ring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?, 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more~than mildsurface oxidation?

'Y ND N/AO YO ND Ug"N/AD 4, hs the anchorage free of visible cracks in the.concrete near the anchors? Y ND UFD N/AD S. Is anchorage~configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: Thifs question-only applies if the item is one of the 53% for which an anchorage configuration verification*.

is required.)

YD ND I N/AD+6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seisrmic conditioins?

YD ND o~4 *c41L ua .4 -~Enter th~e eq~r~tcsname tFrom AppondixB:

Ct are fEquipm~ent.

Page 161 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet a2 ofyq Status: YO NEI] U[0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist.(SWC)

Equipment.1 No- QIH21EO05 Equip. 20..Equipment Descri pioni .o4 1 6KV SWITCHGEAR IG LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Arc soft targets free-from impact by nearby, equipment:or structres?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribdition systems, ceiling files and lighting, iand iasoniy 'block Wa tsl not likely to collapse onto. the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse, seismic. interaction effects?Y~fNO. UO:JN/AQ YILJ NOl UO.N/AO I ONEI Ti N/AC, Y6NO U0J Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and fdund no other seismic conditions that :culd y5( NEI UC adversely affec6tithe safety functions of the equiomeni?

Comments (Additioaal pages hay:o e added as necessary)

.... .,... ...[ 'E-valuated by: ~ ~ ' iQ&u-D~ate: ___________

\,J Page 162 of 561 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .10 Page 163 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0.P, .Page 164 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 f-- k -A Sheet 1 of-i-Status: YE-- NE-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1H21E505 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR IJ LOCAL CONTROL PANEL Location:

Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155' Room, Area 0056C Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YX'N" of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

RQ~e,-c..Wc CNCX.Cý 17- (icm 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?~ c.3eA- vjk ý 'e ~0 A ~~.k'~.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YO- N- UP(N/A--YO NO UpJ[ N/AI 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NBI UO N/Ar" 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NB UOEf'N/AO YO NBi UF'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 165 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 Of Status: Yfl] NF- UI 7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) S Equipment ID No. 01H21E505 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 1J LOCAL CONTROL PANEL.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YJ%/NEJ UD] N/AD]C___&,.4 ".- -ý," %:-_ 6 £ C . 10.& o~- '- 4t -a c".er lj -n c, : +t,,_ Voe.ke 4,, 4 ,re~ cc 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NEI UD] N/AD]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

V4L4. Z c...a -4=.%,-,, 0- c + 6, r-e'h ý 4 eAL-.- ' ,c. ;&Lc e 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? UEI N/A I1 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YPND U[]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? N Other Adverse Conditions S11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo(NEI U'-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

F.leP-Y00 cc-' &A Sizc 00

ýeee,.Evaluated by: I.-rIa',s Date: ,a51.-! 4_Page 166 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT.01, VERSION 1.0 j5cv -3, j!r RD~ ~ ph4.OM..T6-_-I-IF-0 cý.Al-.r ýLeett-J, =PC-ZC- _gqýbým~&. pkej ovt. 4t. S o-6*S 44- aid , 4-k wg % h rot. 4 A Ma 1 4wv*l 7 4m zr*,4-4.~ -A 1-nc V s,, y A. v s 4w rsýdý -#a o

• 0 t acheeo'-%l16&W 0% SW 64-a64- m%.i e.+f A4 Page 167 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 168 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 169 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 170 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of Status: Y[] ND UA Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment fD No. Q1H24E506 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4,16KV SWITCHGEAR 1K LOCAL CONT PANEL Location:

Bldg. SWIS FloorEL 188 Rbom, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Cheeldist This checklist maybe used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWBL. The space below each of the following, questions.mihay be used to record the results ofjudginents and findings..

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comnients, Anchorage 1, Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NO of the 50% of:SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchoragefree.of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?31. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidatioii?

YE NO EA N/AE]YO NE UIl] N/AE U 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in. the concrete near the anchors? YO NE Uj N/A-5. Isý the anchorage conf!gur4tion consistent with plani.douminentation?(Note: This quiestion only applies if the iten is one of the 50/.for which an anchorage.configuration verification~is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free:of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NE U1E IN/AE YE NE .Uq.I Enter the equipment classname from Appendix B: Classes doEquipment.

Page 171 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of X4 Status: YOI NI] UZýEquipment ID No. Q1H21E506 Equip,.Class' 20 : .EquipmentDescription 4,16KV SWtTCHGEAR 1K LOCAL CONTPANEL interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by~nearby equipment or structures?

Y17 NEn UO N/AD/'8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and. lighting, Y NE] U N./AD and mas'niy block walls not.likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to-avoid damage?10. Based on the. above seissmic interaction evaluations, is equipment, free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?"/M NO UD1 N/AD SND; UD Other Adverse;Conditions I I. Have you looked for and found no.other seismic conditions that could Y ýND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

'Evaluated bK v:i tI2- FR.A 1tt- : MIA. uxf4w)U/m oa -ua a Date: Page 172 of 561 9 CHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 9 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0-I'..,. 0'Page 173 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS/-.q 5" ,C.............

.... ..... ...NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 174 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0'-44 Sheet 1 ofXt Status: YrtZ ND" U@Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC).Equipment ID No, Q1H21E527 Equip. Class 20 Equipment .Descrptii6n, DIESEL GENERA TOR1B tBOCAL CONT PANEL Location:

Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155-- Room, Area, M\4anufacturer, Model, Etc. (optiona but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results ofthe Seismic Walkdown of an item. of equipment on the SW EL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findiings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage.1. Is the anchorage configurattion verifibation'required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring:

such verification)?

ArY~hov is fsf&.0-4 -po.4-WCA wldie vr notV I bit cdý-H +ry'e- , o voI t 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchoragefree of corrosion that is more than mildsurface oxidation?

4. Is the ancborage.free of visible cracks in the concrete nebl the anchors?5. Is the. anchorage configuration Consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question.

only applies if the item is~one of the.50%.for whichl an anchorage.

configuration verification is required.)

6: BaSed on the Above anichorage eYaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YX NO YoJ NOl Up N/Afl VYEJ NEI UAZ N/AEI YO NF1 UM, N/Afl YO NOl UP- NA:' Enter theequipment class name from Appendix B-.Classs offEiiipinenit.

Page 175 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 ofZ*Status: Y] NU Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC), Equipment ID No. QIH21E527 Equip. Class' 20.Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1B LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment.

or struct'res?

Yj% NEI. U0 NiAD it4( ý4~et CAAC0~4A J~LA 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and, lighting, YA ND UD N/AEJ and masomny block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequateflexibility to avoid damage" Y% NDI Ur N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment, free Y4, ND uD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NDI' UD adversely affect the safety functions Of the equipment?

/Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary), Evaluatedy L jU) Lt:2./6tDaX, Lxpw-o 1 accAcqj Page 176 of 561 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 177 of 561 O ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIOR Page 178 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheetol of A--Status: Y[L Ufj Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)S Equiipmenit 1ll)No, Q1H21NBAFP26o5A Equip. ClassI 20, Equipment Description HOT SHUTDOWN PANEL A Location: .Bldg.. AUXILIARY Ftoor'El, 121 Room, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but rie;ommend.ed)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the. results of the Seismic Watkdown of an item of equipment.6on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be, used torecord thezresults ofjudgments.

and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting othedr omiOents..Anchorage 1t. Is the anchorage configuration verification requilred (i.e., is the item one YI) NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?,.2. Is the anchoragvfree of bent, broken,. missing0or loosehardware?

3. Isthe anchorage free of corrosion.that is more.than minld surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free. of visible cracksin.

the concrete near the anchors?Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Notn: T'his question, only applies if the item is one of the 50% for:which an anchorage verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evalhatioris, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yq, NED UD N/-AEF Yý NE, UE N./An YU NE uQ]; N/AD 5V NEI UE N/AE]YN NE UE IEnter the equipment el ass natne fromn Appendix B: Claqses~ofEquipment.

Page 179 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0..F1ý4n SI k:Seismic Waikdown Checklistt (SWC)Sheet2-offp Status: YE] N[W UE]EquipmnenvtD No. Q1H21NAFrP2605A Equip. Class' 20*Equipment.

Description HOTSHUTDOWN PANEL A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free fromrimpact by nearby equipmeni or structures?

,8. Are overhead equipmren!, distribt!tion'systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block.watls not likely to'collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?11 ND UD N!/AD Y0 ND UD N/ADýY9 ND UDI N/AD3 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y50 ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions 1.1, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NK UD adversely affece the slafety fuxttions of the equipment?

A cair~\ 4oV 00r co, Thý fm vye -tP OA-"C CV6 A)- 11 l-cvfA Com mients (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by., *~ju AA ( ct &aL.WolvMa~a Date; f3L-5:9/jz Ii z-Page 180 of 561 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION19 i Page 181 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 182 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS

.-f,, -'cl)'NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 183 of 561