ML18078A981

From kanterella
Revision as of 17:51, 5 May 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Namco EA-180 Limit Switch Qualification Rept.
ML18078A981
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 09/05/1978
From:
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
Shared Package
ML18078A979 List:
References
NUDOCS 7903130397
Download: ML18078A981 (76)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:-r ------' ,._ -, _, A.CME-CLEVELAND DEVELOP/VIENT COMPANY * ** ... '*

  • 825 ALPHA ORl\/E *HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, OHIO 44143 * (216) 473-0300 QUALIFICATION OF NAMCO CONTROLS LIMIT SWITCH MODEL EA-180 To* IEEE STANDARDS 344 ('75), 323 ('74) AND 382 ('72) Revision l* September 5, 1978 *Original dated March 3, 1978 9 o 3 1 3 o sct*-,
  • '* I. II. *III. IV. v. VI. VII. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Certification . . . . 1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . 2 Sample Identification . 2 '.Lest Program. . . . . . . 3 Results . . . . . . 9 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Appendices A. Irradiation B. Seismic Tests C. Seismic Conditioning D. Performance Data E. Equipment Used and Calibration Dates F. Supplementary Testing for Short Travel Switches

. , * --ACME-CLEVELAND OEVEL.CJPMENT COMPANY I. CERTIFICATION The undersigned certify that this report presents a true account of the tests conducted and the results obtained. Approved by: ELS:JJP:ij Attachment 1/:-/ .. // E. L. Solem Date* Metallurgical Engineer 9 T. J. Sktngle, Corporate Manager Materials Research and Development t?!tt -t-./. R. L. Nekola, P.E. General Manager Acme-Cleveland Development Company

  • Page 1 of 11
        • -* : *
  • I II. INTRODUCTION The following tests were carried out at or under contract to Acme-Cleveland Development Company, the research center for Acme-Cleveland Corporation.

The switches tested were manu-factured by Namco Controls, an Acme-Cleveland Company. The tests *were carried out in order to test limit switches to the provisions of IEEE Standards 344 ('75), 323 ('74) and 382 ('72). These standards pertain to Class lE safeFy-related equipment for use in nuclear power.plants. The tests consisted of the following parts: 1. ? .... Heat aging for 200 hours at 200°F. Mechanical aeing for 100,000 actuation cycles under electrical load. 3. Irradiation to a level of 204 megarads of gamma radiation.

4. Seismic testing to a maximum of 9.52 g's in the 1 to 35 Hz range. 5. LOCA testing to a maximum 340°F at 70 PSIG. III. SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION From the model EA-180, Type 23, series nuclear switches.

one switch with part number EA-180-11302, Rev.-D, was selected for test purposes. The test facility reference identification nmnber is 161. In order to verify that the short travel mechanism was not subject to seismic failure, one *switch with part CEA-180-14302, Rev. C, was selected for testing through the seismic stage. See Appendix F.

        • e . e
  • I IV. The test facility reference identification number for ** this switch was #83. TEST PROGRAM The test program will be presented in the order in which it was performed.

Throughout the testing the following ment was used to determine the performance level of the units.* A megohm meter measured the resistance between contacts when open. A test circuit measured the load current between contacts when closed. This circuit consisted of a 100 volt DC power supply, appropriate voltage and current meters, and a load bank set to pass 86 milliamps in parallel with a small current (6 ma) neon light. Initial inspection. Open and closed circuit performance was measured and recorded for purposes of base line data. These measurements were not used in the selection of switches for test. Normal quality control inspection had been performed prior to shipment. Heat aging. The heat aging test consisted of holding the unit suspended over water in a tank at a temperature of 200°F for 200 hours.+ A thermometer was placed such that the switch was between it and the heat source. This thermometer was monitored during heat aging. During the time of this test, the conduit opening of the switch was sealed so that the humid air could -not penetrate into the switch via this route. Mechanical aging. The switch was subjected.to 100,000 actuation cycles in order to simulate the normal switching

  • See Appendix E for calibration dates. +Heat aging conditions were taken from ANSI Draft Standard N278.2.l (Draft 3, Rev. 0). The correlation between these conditions and the qualified life is not known. **Within this report this unit ia also referred to as 183-51. --... -I!! .... I .*I

... . e -*( *... * ' functions of the unit during its lifetime. The actuation was accomplished by a cam mechanism operating at 70 actuations per minute. The electrical loading during this part of the test was 500 milliamps at 100 volts DC. Irradiation. Irradiation was performed by Isomedix, Inc. Their certification is contained in Appendix A. Irradiation was carried out to a level of 204 megarads. Gamma radiation from a cobalt 60 source at 1.25 Mev. was used. The irradiation was carried out at a rate of one megarad per hour. Seismic testing. Seismic testing was performed by Dr. ward J. Walter and Associates. The complete description of apparatus and procedure is contained in Appendix B. Single axis tests were performed in each of the three axes. The test spectrum used is given in Table I. Note that either acceleration or displacement may be the independent variable. TABLE I SEISMIC TEST SPECTRUM (INPUT MOTION) Peak to Peak Frequency Peak Acceleration Displacement 1-4 Hz 0.6-9.52 g's 12 inches 4-10 Hz 9.52 g's 10-20 Hz 0.45 inches 20-35 Hz 9.52 g's Seismic Testing -Cross Coupling. All of the parts and assemblies of which the switch is comprised may be classified into three categories depending upon the geometric constraints upon their movement within the unit. The first category is components free to revolve about an axis but which have balanced angular masses about that axis. The second Page 4 of 11

.. ,9 category is components which are free to rotate about an axis within 0 a range the limits of which are 9 to either side of a principal axis of the switch. The third category is parts which are constrained to 0 linear movement in a line which is within 9 of a major axis of the switch. The contact lever ann assembly (83) is in the first category.

As the angular moment of inertia of this component is balanced about the central axis, vibration will not result in any torque about the axis. Therefore, it is not necessary to consider this component in the analysis of cross coupling. Components belonging to the second category are the lever shaft assembly (94), the latches (19) and the rocker arm (65). The parts belonging to the third class are the contact carrier plate assemblies which are located at the ends of the contact lever assembly (83) and the roller assembly (75, 80 and 81). The linear motions of category 3 components except (75, 80 and 81) and the tangential motions of the category 2 components are all within 9° of the Y axis. Therefore, a vibration with a deviation of 9° from the Y axis would cause a higher G loading along the direction of motion of these components than motion directly along the Y axis. Therefore, the G levels used in single axis testing should be multiplied by a factor of .98 (i.e. cosine of 9°) in order to compensate for possible effects due to multi-axis vibration. 0 Movement of components (75, 80 and 81) is within 9 of the X axis. Therefore, it could cross-couple with the Y axis movements of Page S of 11 [}),,, . ,,--* , .. *-*1-'t' "-.:! ** cuaT. PAllT NO. Aaa*y NO, .so J'E,e,e.Qr/ON °'9rn 48 re£rN cf?V-'1'-'Y .JP.Qt:lf"D

  • 470/* 4(A5 o.o. NAMCO CCJNTFIOLS

.!=a ** ......,.

  • A --*--

____ _ the other category 2 and 3 components. The X axis movements of (75, 80 _'_:, and 81) cannot cause any Y axis movements directly. It can, however, .e - allow Y axis movements of (65) and (94). It is shown below that movements of (94) cannot occur at 10 g's due to the preloaded force of spring (107). A B c D E F G Weight of Non-Total Minimum Preload* Cylindrical Off Axis Effective Loading Force Parts of Weight Weight Mechanical Weight** Movement (107) (94) of (81) (B+c) Advantage (DxE) (A/F) 3,220 gm 53.9 gm 12. 9 gm 66.8 gm 2 133.6 gm 24.1 g's In order to determine that movement of (65) due to cross coupling vas not a factor in these tests a separate-test was run with components (75, 80 and 81) completely removed.+ This conservatively simulates any cross coupling between components (75, 80 and 81) and (65). Due to the above considerations cross coupling is not considered limiting in this unit and, therefore, single axis vibration testing is considered suitable. It can be seen from the data in Appendix B that the switch used in the present qualification was not used in the seismic qualification. Switches #32, 33 and 45 which were included in the seismic testing are internally identical to the switch #61 covered in this present qualification. The_ only difference between switch tl61 and switches 32, 33 and 45 was the material for 0-rings, lubrication and gaskets. It was not considered necessary, therefore, to *Blueprint specified minimum. **All mass is conservatively assumed to be concentrated at the end of the lever shaft assembly. g for ... ___ "'II _!!! "l, C_ (} +See page 12(B) --*e -*** . ** take new seismic data on the present switch. In order to simulate the condition of a switch which has undergone a seismic event switch #61 was seismically conditioned by subjecting it to all vibrations contained in the seismic tests. Electrical load was applied during these vibrations, however, the ance of the switch was not monitored during this conditioning (see Appendix C). LOCA Test. The temperature pressure profile for the test is given in Fig. l*. The first four days of LOCA testing was performed in a chamber of 12" height and 8 11 diameter. The switch was mounted in the chamber in a horizontal position such that the lever shaft pointed upwards. The switch was attached by means of a threaded pipe. Teflon tape was used for sealing the pipe threads.+ This pipe ran through an 0-ring type feed-through in the chamber. The electrical connections from the switch were run through this same pipe. Actuation of the switch was provided by a rotary feedthrough in the top of the chamber. In order to produce the portions of the required test which call for pressure below saturation air pressure was applied to the interior of the switch. Air pressure was adjusted so that the differential pressure between the interior and the exterior *of the switch was as specified. The test chamber (exterior to the switch) was held at the specified temperature under saturated conditions. Page 8 of 11 **The switches (32. 33 & 45) which were seismically tested had been subjected to heat aging. wear cycling and irradiation prior to seismic testing. See Appendix G. . *The recorded pressure temperature data is presented on pages 8-ll(D). +No attempt is made to qualify the connection method. These test procedures are based on the assumption the user will ensure that no steam entcrR;-'.'J, the unit via this connection during an actual LOCA. ,, / ' *. ....

  • The switch was subjected to a caustic spray during this portion of LOCA test. The flow rate of the spray was 230 cc's per minute providing the necessary coverage of .OlS gallons per minute per square foot of cross-section.

The pH of the spray was maintained between 10 and 11. The spray was composed of boric acid, water, sodium thoiosulfate and sodium hydroxide, and was recycled during the entire time. Spraying was initiated follow-ing the second transient temperature rise. The switch was transferred from the high pressure chamber to a low pressure chamber following the first four days of the LOCA test. It remained in this low pressure chamber for the rest of the 30 day LOCA period. During this part of the test the switch was sprayed with distilled water which was continuously recycled. Two data acquisition methods were used during the LOCA. The temperature was recorded on a strip chart recorder via a thermocouple. During the transient sections of the LOCA the digital readout from the thermocouple, as well as the reading of the pressure gage, were recorded on video tape. The data is recorded on scenes 611 and 612 of this tape which is on file in the library of Acme-Cleveland Development Company. *The switch was actuated ten times during the peak level of* the second transient of the LOCA and at other times as noted in Fig. 1. Data were taken twice during the second peak level and at the conclusion of the test. V. RESULTS tt During all phases of the test, the open contact re---** ;*:::.\ ****** sistance of the switch remained above 50 kilohms. The closed Page 9 of 11 ... ....... -** -*-circuit current remained within two milliamps of the specified load. During seismic testing, the trip point (with 1-1/2 inch arm) varied by .107" or less*' for all units seismically tested. Detailed performance data are presented in Appendices B, D and F. VI. CONCLUSIONS Switch representing revision level D of model ;'fEA-180-11302 maintained a SOKJL open circuit resistance with all other performance satisfactory during all sections of the test. -. Switch /}83 representing rev.ision level C of model ;'fEA-180-14302 maintained trip position within .107" of original with all other performance satisfactory tliroughout

    • all sections of the test performed on it. The tests were carried out from June of 1977 to January of 1978. ELS:JJP:ij . March 3, 1978 Page 10 of 11 *.0625" for standard travel switches.
    • See Appendix F.

340 il l -I 320 -280 .._ ,... ra. 0 ...., lb CQ r.> ::::> 250 .... .... ._ 0 Cal "' .... '1l 200 .. . 140 -I 10 SEC l j 2 l I l I I 1 3 INDICATES CYCLING OF VALVE ACTUATOR The DBE environment for qualification is that obtained by subtracting margin from the test profile. LV' 4 . s ' 1 -Differential pressure -70PSI 2 ditto 70 " -3 ditto -40 " 4 ditto -25 " 5 ditto -10 " I I I I I r 3 5 8 11 4 14 30 HR HR HR HR DAYS DAYS DAY 5 HR-10 SEC TIME--. Fig 1 Test Chamber Temperature Profile for Accident Environment Simulation (Taken from IEEE Standard 382-1972) .. s I I f I, t:

  • . **----VII. APPENDICES

. . *** **:: .* APPENDIX A Irradiation

  • . -* :****** /*::::'9 -.. , --.:::::1 ' *. v ISOMECIX Mr. Edward L. Solem Metallurgy Engineer Acme-Cleveland Development C::o. 625 Alpha Drive Highland Heights, Ohio 44143

Dear Mr. Solem:

November 9, 1977 This will summarize parameters pertinent to the irradiation of two switches per your Purchase Order of October 12, 1977. The units were identified as switches 59 and 61. The units were placed in a Cobalt-.60 garn."Tla field such that the dose rate was .7 Mrad/hr. The units were exposed for 291.5 hours, yielding a minimum dose of 204 megarads.

The samples were rotated and turned during exposure to obtain the most even dose distribution. was conducted in air at ambient temperature and pressure. Radiant heat from the source heated the samples somewhat, but the temperature did not exceed 110°F as indicated by previous measurements on an oil solution in the same relative position. Dosimetry was performed using an Atomic Energy of Canada, Ltd. (AECL), Red Perspex system with Type BC-2 readout. Calibration of the Perspex is made by AECL using eerie dosimetry traceable to the U.S. National Bureau of Isomedix regularly cross-calibrates its AECL system with an inhouse Harwell Perspex system, and makes semi-annual calibrations directly with NBS, using the NBS Radiochromic Dye system. A copy of the dosimetry correlation report is available upon request. Irradiation was initiated on October 7, 1977 and completed on October 24, 1977. JCY:iy Jonathan c. Yo ng Production Manager Page 1 .of l (A) lsomedlx Inc.

  • 25 Easlm8ns no11d, Parsippany, New Jersey (201) 887*4700 Ma""'" Add1H1 ro11 0111c* n..a 111. r.""'."'*

,_. ,,.,.., 010*,. CHICAGO DIVISION

  • r1121 N*oll A ..... ..,,.,,, cr-.111111ort 500'..> 1>111 te1110
  • . _a **** .. .l APPENDIX B Seismic Tests *

..... __ ., *** l-.;;;t .... *****-]{Ii)._* \\.: ._,.,._ SEISMIC QUALIFICATICN TEST

  • OF LIMIT CONTROL SWITCHES June:-1977 Prepc.red for Contro 1 s An Acm2--C"lt:1JelanC: u
  • Page 1 of 13 (B) Z'r. .i H',1/itr .{ ,,*f s . .:,*ai1!t.'

l ,w,f L

  • . ..... e r.::*.:: \-:-:-:.-:*:.
1. PURR:lSE :D1: 8d11 1 nrd !f. tl'nltcr ,E Assorintcs llibrn!io11 n11d SOlflld eo11s11//n1tls

'" *_.:!;: _ _: '

  • P.O. BOX 171
  • CHESTERLAND, OHIO 4402G
  • TELEPHONE:

(216) 729-7415 Four Limit Control Switches manu.fectured by NAMCO Controls were subjected to a seismic qualification test for Class l.E equipment to be used in nuclear-powered electrical generating plants. The :four switches are a representative sample of EA180-11302 and EA740-80100 limit svitches and the seismic test results will be considered es representative of the characteristics of each switch series. The tests involved single-axis sinusoidal vibration in each of three mutually perpendicular axes parallel to the major dimensions of the switch, in accordance \..?ith IEEE 382-1972, . 323-1914, end 344-1975. The test progrem was conducted by Dr. Edward J. Walter and Associates at the John Carroll University Seismological tory, Cleveland, Ohio. NAMCO representatives were present during various stages of the tests and monitored parts of the test program. Page 2 of 13 .. ..... ..... ., e 2. IDENTIFICATIOH OF SWITCHES The following switches were subjected to the seismic test procedure. All switches were manufactured by NAMCO Switch Sample Number Switch No. 32 Switch No. 33 Switch No. 45 Switch No. 38 Switch No. 58

  • Snap-L::>ck.

Limit Switch EA180-11302 Ampere Rating Volts AC oc 125 20 5 250 15 1.5 480 10 600 5 NAMCO Controls An Acme-Cleveland Company Cleveland, Ohio U.S.A. Same as Switch N?. 32 Same as Switch No. 32 Snap-Lock. Limit Switch EA740-80100 Ampere Rating* Volts AC DC 125 20 5 250 15 1.5 480 10 600 5 Nlll*1C:O Controls An Acme-Cleveland Company Cleveland, Ohio U.S.A. Same as Switch No. }8 Page 3 of 13 (B) i . I

        • e ........ *** 3. TEST EQUIPMENT The test equipment consisted of two different shake tables. The first shake table was a mechanical device for large amplitude

-low frequency vibration. Maximum peak to peak displacement was twelve inches, giving a single amplitude of six inches. Displacements down to .025 inches single amplitude could be achieved. The mechanical shake table was used to test over the frequency range 1-20 Hz. The second device was an electro-dynamic shake table for small amplitude -high frequency vibration. "Peak to Peak displacement up to 0.4 inches could be achieved. The electrodynamic shake table was used to test over the frequency range 20-35 Hz. Both shake tables were monitored e for wave form by an accelerometer mounted on the table. During the test procedure the switch was energized electrically with 125 volts DC at 1/2 amp. and monitored continuously for contact opening of 2 milliseconds or greater. The switch was tripped from the actuated position to the unactuated and back during the test procedure* and monitored for contact opening.

  • __ _ Page 4 of 13 (B)

.. *. 1'. --**--*--L*:::: .. SEISMIC TEST PROCEDURE Each switch was individuolly mounted on the shake table vith one of its major oxes parallel to the direction of table motion. After tion of this test the switch vas reoriented on the table with its second major axis parallel to the table motion, and similarly for the third major axis. Special fixtures for mounting the switches and activating them had to be fabricated. Part I -Resonance Search In each orientation each switch was subjected to a continuous sine sweep from l to 35 Hz at a rate of one octave per minute. This sine was run as follows: Frequency Hz 1-10 10-35 Part II -Fragility Test Displacement inches 1.0 0.01 In each orientation, each switch was subjected to a sine dwell in 1/3 octave bands over the frequency ranges 1-35 Hz. The switch was vib-* rated for a minimum of 60 seconds at each dwell point, ber;inninc

  • .:ith 15 seconds of vibration in the unactuated
position.

The switch was then ated by a manual tripping device and vibrated for ;o seconds in the actuated position. After this, the tch *was released. by the manual tripping de;-.*ice and vibrated for 15 seconds in the unactuated position. The switch '-"as the double throi,;r type. During the vibration test, the switch contacts were monitored for opening by a light indicator circuit. If the light indicator circuit si6-nalcd a contact opening, the durction of opening uas then monitored on an oscilliscope. The criteria for seisrnic failure was a contact opening of 2.0 milli-seconds or greater. Both the Normally Open (NO) c:ontacts end the mally Closed (NC) contacts were monitored during the tests. The trip angle of each switch vas also durinc the tion test. This was done by monitoring the sv:S.tch anele position on the oscilliscopc. The varint.ion in the trip oni;le position should not e>:cecd o.o6o inches while being subjected the vibrotion test. Page S of 13 (B) ... -:*:'9 ****-** ..... e 'l'be dwell test was run in 1/3 octave bands ct the :f'ollawing frequencies and vibration specifications. Frequency Hz 1.0 i.25 l.6 2.0 2.5 4.o 5.0 6.3 8.o 10.0 12.5 i6.o 20.0 25.0 Dwell Points Vibration Specifications f 4 Displacement -12.0 inches pp. giving 9.52 g's at 4 Hz 4 < 'f < 10 -acceleration 9.52 Displacement -8.o inches pp. Displacement -5.0 inches PP* Displacement 3.0 inches PP* 10 f < 20 Displacement - inches PP* b 20 < f ( 35 -acceleration

9. 52 g Displacement

-0.4*inchcs pp. 'l'he table motion was constrained to specific displacements as specified or as required to produce the specified Wave shape va5 monitored by an accelerometer mounted on the table. The planes of vibration relative to the switch configurotion are &holm in the folla11ing diagram and each switch was subjected to 54 distinct vibration tests ** ! x Page 6 of 13 (B) . ' *

-*. ... ... ---**e -*.--** 5. TEST RESULTS
  • A1l switches perfonned with no malfunctions in the sine sweep from 1 Hz to 35 llz. Also, no resonances vere observed during the sine sweep test. ID the sine dwell test.of 60 second duration during which the switch vas actuated end released, no malfunctions vere observed.

The test circuit did indicate a reaction to a small voltage change which *when monitored on tbe_oscilloscope was less than 2.0 seconds and hence not within the definition of switch failure.* The various frequencies for each svitch at *which such en indication occurred is shown in the following table.

  • f s w i t c h Hz )5 )2 45 :;:5 1.0 x x 1.25 x x 1.6 x x x x 2.0 x x x 2.5 x x x 3.15 x x 4.o x x 5.0 x .6.3 x x 8.o x x 10.0 x 12.5 x x i6.o x x x 20.0 x 25.0 x x x x }2.0 *X x . All the above switch contact openinas vcre of duration less than 2.0 m1111-occonds. . Page 7 of 13 (B) <<See pace 13(B)

... *, ::: .*. -**** -*e --------The trip position of each of the switches remained within the required limit end at no time deviated from the original position by more than 0.060 inches at the end of the tvo inch arm. In fact, the changes noted vere small compared to the tolerance limit. The test results are facility limited and therefore do not indicate the ultimate capability or the vibration level at vhich switch failure vill occur. Each svitch vas subjected to 54 distinct vibration tests vhich lasted for 6o seconds or greater so that minimally each svitch was vibrated for 54 minutes. Checks for frequency and wave shape and other manual opera-"tions extended the total vibration tillle by perhaps a factor of tvo or three. Page 8 of 13 (B) .. *-***e ..... e .......... .. 6. CONCLUSIOl6 The limit control switches performed satisfactorily without vhen vibration tested in accord with the sented herein. No contact opening of 2 or greater occurred durinG the tests. No resonance frequencies were noted during the test. ' Page 9 of 13 (B) .. c *. e j

  • I 7. CERTIFICATION The undersigned certifJ* that this report presents a true account of the tests conducted and the results obtained.
  • .' *-.. --5 b; .
  • __ .... / James DiS iena ' . ' Page 10 of 13 (B)

.. . . .. :: . ..... ., ----L:::: .. EQUIIMEIIT USED Calidyne Electrodynamic Shaker, Model B44 Mechanical Shake Table Tektronix StoraGe Oscilloscope Type 564 Shure Brothers Accelerometer Model 62CP, calibrated August, 1977 Brusb-CleYite Recorder Mark II

  • Page 11 of 13 (B) . *-
            • :.-...* e ZJr. 8d1vnrd ff. lVn!tcr .. E Associates Vi/Jrnlio11 n11d S(11111tf Co11s11/tn11ls P.O. BOX 171
  • CHESTER LAND, OHIO 44026
  • TELEPHONE:

(216) 729-7415 Vibration Tests of Limit Control Switches NAMCO Controls An Acme-Cleveland Company September, 1977 Switch Tested Svitch No. 32 -EA 180-11302 Vibration Tests The purpose of the test was to determine whether cross-coupling would cause the swi tcb to trip, and thus fa.il. The roller and spring were removed and the switch*was vibrated in the Y-component. No failures were observed during the test The displacement, maximum frequency, and g-loading at which the S\ritch was vibrated are given in the following table: Displacement Frequency Acceleration inches PP in Hz g's 12.l 4.5 13.6 10.1 5.0 12.6 7.9 5.5 12.0 6.3 6.5 13.4 5.0 6.7 11.6 4.o 7.2 10.6 3.1 l0.5 17.5 2.5 12.5 19.8 2.0 14.o 19.B l.6 16.o 20.3 0.5 21.0 11.0 o.4 9.6 results indicate that failure due to cross-couplinc in the Y-ccmponcnt did not occur. EDWARD J. AHD AS50CIATl:S October 5 1 1977 Page 12 of 13 (B)

  • ACft/IE-CLEVELAND DEVELDPIVIENT COMPANY Behavior Of The Test Circuit The test circuit was designed to detect switch openings of more than a pre-set time. For the purpose of these tests the time *was set at 2 milliseconds.

During the seismic tests it was reported that the circuit was triggering. Therefore, personnel !rom Acme-Cleveland Development Company observed the situation. It was found by use of an oscilliscope that the circuit was responding not to contact openings but to small changes in voltage due to increases in contact resistance as the contacts moved over one another. Although the decrease in voltage may have lasted for considerable times, no contact openings of more than 2 milliseconds were observed in that instance. At that point it was decided that whenever the circuit was triggered the oscilliscope would be used (by Dr. Edward J. Walter & sociates' personnel) to determine if there was a contact opening of more than 2 milliseconds or not. 7 //1//7 . E. Solem Metallurgical Engineer Page 13 of 13 (B) ._._. ... APPENDIX C Seismic Conditioning . . .... I t-******* ---.L" f" "

--.-u. * ** * . . . . !J1: 8d1vn1'tl J. 1Vnllr.r *t v-1 ssf1rinlcs

  • lli/Jrnlif111 n11d Sf111111f Co11s11//n11/s
  • . P.O. DOX 171
  • CHESTER LAND. OHIO 4402G
  • TELEPHONE:

(21G) 7i9-74_15 Vibration Tests of Limit Control Switches NAMCO Controls

  • Im Acrue-Clcvcland Company *
  • 1977 swrrcn:ts TESTED Switch No. 59, EA 180-11302 Switch No. 61, EA 180-1132
  • Vll3RATION TESTS
  • 0 !rbc S'-'itches
  • were subjected.

to the f'ollo,dng tests: X -Fragility Test Frequency Hz Vi brat.ion . Specif'ications .. l.O l.25 l.6 2.0 2.5 }.15 Ji.o ' Displacement -12.1 ir.ches pp civinB 9.52 g's acceleration nt Hz. . . . . .

  • 5.0 6.!i l.O.O l2.5 16.0 20.0 25.0 '2*0 .. Acceleration 9.52 or c;-cater J>icplnccmcnt Dis plac t D:S.cploccmcnt.

Dioplaccmcnt. Displnccme:i1t oo obovc .ns obovc . -8.0 inches pp -5.0 inches 'P:;:> -3.0 inches pp -2.0 inches pp O. 115 .inches pp Dicplnccmcnt - inches pp civing ncc.clcrotion 9.52 s's or ueut.cr. * !l'hie vas*lll8nufoctured toe bill or materials to model EA-180-l.i302

  • ** * * ** ** Paga 1 of 2 (C) . . . *. .. .. . .

II -Plant Induced Vibration Simulation !'he svitches vcre vibrotcd o.t a non-resgnant frequency, 100 Jiz at an acceleration 1.3 g for a total or 10 cycle&, one third or the

  • total cycle&* in each component, X, Y, and z.
  • Canponent x y z Frequency Hz
  • 100 100 .100. Acceleration g's 1.3 1.3 1.3 The svitches were tested in each of three mutually directions parallel to the major axes of tbe switches.

In each tion a fragility dwell test and a plant induced vibration test vere made

  • The dwell test was for a minimum of 60 seconds duration, beginning vith 15 seconds of v.ibration in the -unactuated position *. The switch was then actuated by a manual tripping device and v:l.brated for ;o seconC.s in the actuated position.

After this, the switch released by the canual tripping device end vibrated for 15 seconds in the unactuated position. 6he plant induced vibration simulation test *1as run for a minm..im of 10 cycles in all three components. Each c9mponent, X, Y, end Z,vas subjected to one-third of the total nUI:lber of cycles, e.g. 1/3 x 10° cycles.

  • The 6Witches were double throw ty::pe and *were enersized electrically at l25 volts at 1/2 amp. during the tests. Each s-,.*itch

\;as subjected to 51 distinct vibration tests, 48 of these at a minir.um ti.I:e of 60 seconds each and three of these nt a mini.mum time of 56 minutes each. Dn. J .1 WAL'l'.l:.'R Alm ASSOCIATES November / \1977 Page 2 of 2 .(C) . . . . . .. .. APPENDIX D Performance Data . . ... .a .... I AGING I ff 61 _ J-7J HODEL C EA180-11302 DATE .9-22-77 c::JPROTOTYPE cx:::::lPASS SPECIAL PARTS: EPDM 0-ring Nye 438 oil & 734 gre* C::=J PRODUCTION c:J FAIL

  • 060" 892 Loctite top & bottoc i!asttets.

TIME DA' l'E 3:45 PM 9-22-77 -7:30 AM 9-26-17 n 9-27-77 " n 9-28-77 II II 9-29-77 II 11* 9-30-r77 II II 10-3-77 II ELtCTRICALS I LOAD = ! . OS6A! @ loo! voe INITIAL "'Inf Inf Inf Inf .086 .086 .086 .086 ' FINAL Inf II II II II II II II I OTHER I I I I I back) (Continue on INTERIOR'EXAMINATION (OPTIONAL) ' i GASKETS: CONTACTS: I 0-RING:

  • 1 GREASE: ------1 *Inf.
  • Ooen c:ontac resi above 1000 l
  • : v 1--Page 1 of lS(D) (U>ntinuo on
  • E: ... J-7l c::J PROTOTYPE c::J PRODUCTION WEAR CYCLU1G. a=J PASS c:J FAIL SWITCH ff_6_1 __ _. HODEL f! EA.180-UJO; EZ10607-23 PARTS: EPDM 892 impret gasiets tJ and J::'lll Nye 1438 grease SST Leick 'Washers on top over . ' ' -:r 1 . 1 , 1 # OF CYCLES 100, IOOO . . I I I , LOADi .SA @1 100 voe -' I CYCLE RATE 70 I METHOD Cam I I I I I I Ro] lr!!r '"' !1 .... .; ... I .. -.. J __ ..

... 'llnvl I I I I ELECTRICAL MEASUREMENTS; LOAD .. : . 086A ! @ ioo hrnc ! I *------- ! ____ I I I I T 3 2 4 'l 13 : 2 4 I 1 INITIAL I* I 'I Inf Inf Inf : .086 .086 .086 .086 Inf I FINAL 10-5-77 " .. " " I " II II II i OTHER I i I .. --.... -*-* * --. -* -I -I INTERNAL EXAMINATION (OPT!O!'lAL) I ., I ' back 'cco:ntinue on GASKETS: I I I ,. CONTACTS: l-------------+-----J----+----+----11----+----+----l-----+----+----1----t----* BLOCK:

  • 0-RING: 1/l.) GREASE: ----* ----****--* . -. *-.. --Page 2 of 15 (D) (continue on

---. .-... --.. ... ' -****-DATE 10-26-77 SWITCH {E 61 J-71 [J PROTOTYPE JDPASS MODF.L iJ EAlB0-11302 t:J PRODUCTION IRRADIATION CJFAIL EZ10607-23 SPECIAL PA..ltTS: I EPDM,0-rinJ, .o6J" LocJite Jsket:l Nye l3s on shaft and o-rf ng, 7i4A +der tf P sc*ws. I I ---- ---* -*----f -*. .r -* I -I I I I I I I I I IRRADIATED AT: I ! I --I . I I I FROM 10-6-771 I : TO i0-26-7.7 TOTAL IRRADIATION 204 I ENERGY LEVEL 1. 25 SOURCE cdbalt 60 I RATE. 7 I -------. -*. -. .. OSGA @ vnd ! ELECTRIDAL MEASUREMEh'TS

:*LOAD1 COMMENTS -----------Me: I "Conductivity (amps) . I icor i ,.gar I Check!ed swit.ches l 3 2 I 4 l 3 2 4 radicrtion, PK. i I ! INITIAL 10-5-77 Inf Inf Inf Inf .086 .086 .086 .086 ! I FINAL 10-26-77 " II II " " " " II I OTHER I I I I I .. I INTERIOR EXAMINATION (OPTIONAL)

! i I Gaskets: .. ---* ----------CONTACTS: I I I I ! BLOCK: I I .. =t--. *----. 0-RING: * -*---. GJU:ASE: ,,... '\ ,_ COMMENTS (Cont. ..... . . L --* -------.. -( ...... . *------ Page 3 of lS (D) 1continuc on h:ick) -*--DATE 11-15-77 1-E::J PROTOTYPE CJ PRODUCTION SEISMIC TESTING SWITCH 61 -------1 MODEL EAl.80-11302 EZ10607-23 CJ FAIL SPECIAL PARTS: EPDI-Lo41te r.ketL fJ A greBe, I I I I i : oil on 0-rf.Dg, --.. --* ... ... . --... ----.. . --. ---.. *=-.z:* ---.-. *-: -- & I I ITESTED BY: Dr. !Edward . I : I ! REPORT REF. : I I I I I i I I I IEEE 32!3, and 382. I i ! . . : i I INTERNAL EXAl'UNATION. (OPTIONAL) ' i GASKETS I ! I r I -!-. I I I I ' ! CONTACTS -. . . I BLOCK i I ! I I I I 0-RING I I i ! ! I ! I I I I I I COMMENTS I I j_ ,. .... tt'of I als: -* . eeear Cond1Jctivit\.' (Ar.:P 6) I 2 2 1 3 2 4 Before aeiaic Inf Inf Inf Inf .086 .086 .086 .086 After aeind.c II " II II " " .. II ; 11-15-77 ,_ . -----, \...) .. --,_ *Page 4 of 15 (D) . .. A -***** D A'M:' 11-15-77 A.&."°-------- PAr;E CD SWITCH fl 61 ----i J-71 c::=i PROTOTYPE LOCAi ____ _ MODEL EAlB0-1131 W PASS EZ10607-23 c::J PRODUCTION LOCA TEST c=i FAIL SPECIAL PARTS: EPDM o-rJig .OJ," Loe. ite ilapregJted 8 1 n I I top land I lasketJ, I I I Nye 143 I I I oil on 0-ring, 734J greaE e S.S.1 washers on I op corer . **-. PROFILE REF * : ! IEEE 32J and I I I CAUSTIC SPRAY? '.NAOH, !Boric lAcid, ISodiumkhiosull.phate' CAUSTIC THEO'U:TICAL ! FROM TIME; TO TE?1P. PRESS. 'now TEXP COMZ*tENTS PROFILE .. -* 1 120c*F 2 sec. 225°F 117 PSI :JO PSI insta led in low ten' Diff. oressu e ol] 11/19./7 2 11 10 sec

  • 328°F Diff : 1u I:' .. . t>ress
  • o on Flow 3 11 5 mir
  • 340°F II 1 ver tP

&Wit --------4-t--3-4-0+----t-3-h-r-.E+-.---+--,-, Y ll /. -, 5 340 . 2 .hr!. 120o:E 1 Rempved S' itch lZ/lt>ft7 1

6 Rep1atSt1psl,2,364*

I GASKETS: CONTACTS: 0-RING: GREASE: 7 340 2 hr! . 320°:E ;40 PSI: diff.; 8 320 3 hn . i'ZS PSI diff.: 9 250 3. 5 de ys 250°'E I 10 200 26 da* s 200°F. 10 PSI! , INTERNAL 1 EXA!-1!!-lATION (OPTIONAL) I I Botti m easl et wa! crad ed at the cehter hbusing! suppo t. dr lPS we e the l ottom housit g. To1 que tc remo'f sere s was 4 to lb. fnchesr The ,o gask1 t was moist and h<1a a t< cky suostane¥! on the surrace onneci:.i at t e cen er SC ews. TorouE to remove tbn scr 0 ws was 8 to! 13 lb inches. The asket: were hard <ind br ttle. I The ontac s a re1 idue Jn the but reasonablv ,_ ' The t)...rinP was 1 eood condi ion ,., d was lresilj lent. i 1e 438 oil wbs nre >E on ttie aha t and O-rin1

  • The t?rease 0734A was D esent on th1 slidi n2 su1 faces. " s_h_a_f_t_
  • ...-T_h_e_r "I_ _j OTHER.: The 11 boot crack* d vhe remo ed frc m the ----**-------t 01 tn ---.-witcfnapp1 ared cl ban . . *.. .*. Page 5 of 1510)
.: ... e -. DATE 11-15-77 PAGE (}) SWITCH f! EA-180-11302

___ _ 61 J-71 EZ-10607-23 LOCA # __ 9 ____ _ LOCA TEST LOAD . 086A @ 100 VDC --1 -- ---r*--r-i-1 Meggar I' Conductivity (amps)

  • j I TIME DATE ELAPSED TIME l 3 i 2 4 1 i 3 I 2 I 4 C0!1MElITS
    • **-9:30 A?* 11-15-77 Inf Inf Inf Inf
  • 086 .086 .086 .086 -I. I

__ __ 10:25 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 " " Prehe<t 2509F 10:40 II 900:1 II II 900:*1 II " II II " 11:05 11 Inf 11 " Inf " 11 I " " 120°F 11:20 ,, lOM 150?1 70M 150:'.!-I " II II " 34o 0 r I 11:25 " lOOH SOM II " " " " , I 12: 15 l !*I II llml l30M OOM 120!-1 12: 40 II l50M 30M 130:1 2: 05 " 150M L50!*1 150:-1 2: 15 " Inf Inf Inf Inf 3:35 II 4:15 II 4:35 II 4:40 II 4:50 " 5:25 II 6:20 II 6:45 II 7:55 II 10:00 II 10:55 II 11:30 II 12: 15 f.M 11-16-77 7: 35 " 7:40 9:00 10:30 11:15 12:15 6:00 8:00 10:00 ti II " " .. " " " ----" " II " II II II II BOOK 1011 1. 5?-1 40M 60M tl30H 130!1 75H 90M SOM 90?-! 100:'-I l1.30M LO_O:i IL20M 1101*1 ll.3cr.i lOffi.1 POU 120!'-I !I.80!-f l40!-1 IL70M 14m1 II.SOM 150!! 14m1 !I.80!i 11.70!1 !LOOOM lOOOM II " H II II 300M 300?-1 II 900M 90cr.I II tlnf Inf Inf Inf .. " II It " " " " ti II " .. " " II II " II II If II II " " Ii " II II II II " II " II II II II II " II II " " II II " II II .086 .086 " " II .. II II " " " .. .. ---Page 6 of 15 (D) -" II II r I " II . " II " ! " " II II ,, II " " 340°F 2nd si ik " II 340°1 " " " II II " II " II i L --------,, 320°F I I " " " .. I " ,-1 250°F II '* I .086 .086 " II " " " .. " .. " " I " " II .. " .""! .. .. ,----------.. -----**-*-- ....* .... ., ..... ****--/ DATE 11-17-77 PAt;E CD SWITCH fJ 61 EA-18011302 ____ _ f-71 LOCA # ______ _ TIME DATE *-T_ ELAPSED TIME EZ10607-23 LOCA TEST LOAD .086A 100 VDC -**-J -. ---* *--** ---* **-.--I I 250°:1 .. .. 12:00 :-1 11-16-77 Inf --.. Inf Inf Inf *---* II " 8:40 H II II H II II II H ! __ __. ______ 11:30 " It " " " II " " I " " 2:45P! " " II " II " "I"! " II 3:30 II " " " " " " .. I " " 6:00 " " " " II I -----f--------4---+---l----+----+---"--- --*-+---+--....;...;..---+----+-- 8:00 II " " . " " " I 10:00 II " " " " " 12: 00 t\!! 11-13-7 " " " " II II 7: 35 A ! " " " " " . 036

  • 086
  • 086 ! . 086 . -------

i o: oo " " .. .. " .. .. .. I .. " .11 12: 15 " " " " " " " " " " --- 1:30 " " " " " " " " " " ---t------

  • 3: 00 " " ... " " " " " " " ..

I" 3:55 " " " " " " " " " 6:00 " " " " " " I 8:00 " " " " II " 10:00 " " " " " " l.2 :00 11-19-7 " " " " " 7: 30 J I " " " " " .OS6

  • 086 . 086 . 086 .,

.... 9:40 " " " " " " " " " " 10:30 " " " " " " " " I .. " I . , 12:05 " " " " " " " 1 " " 12 :50 " " " " " " ,, " " 1Sw1tcn; out o

  • .i.ne O?en cbntact resis ance n cl1 :it> wa5 nnn1l e and (tnc CJ 5Sec1C

__ e+ 1----1 .... n!.ll C'"-"'"-'h'-';e-!i!:s,..w_,_,.t::.C!.!h......:.f hi l-h t eir.ne rl.i tu re land r: s LC'C.\ install in the lbw sure lnd te1 nerat1 re L0 1 A. I *---. I 12-16-77 _, -* __ ._50K SOK SOK SOK

  • 086
  • 086
  • 086 * .\f ter t Open conttict.

Leakai:te

  • 0025 0025 .0035 .0035 i I *, TIU!

f;,"3D iJ--;t)t. **uu ... l:U?"n:1 '"' uu nerrc' ftl:iilCl: II es"tSl i.l!Rl! 4 . '!Y!! QOO Uet:ohms 'tnfin .ll'Llffore nstal inr. 1 the_ K ohm! on t_I contpcts . after irrl:-the ow an nrcs ur*: c .:>mber.

  • j ----* . The s*1itrl
  • h 1hblt!

2 ihs nL!l no bLJ.ubbl1 test the cl the o c21 t:icts was 2 5. to f.i.?H a fte*. iinJ: th .12 .lz.1. O[ air to _ ...:::: *;tr rnn,ILI tl_C.Jl nm.L. e.il t* M li:in*s. ----1-* :__\) ,(-1--*---, ._, 7 of -*+*-- t DATE. 11-15-77 J-11 . . LOCA C _ _;..9 ____ _ TIME TI to 9: 50 A:I 10:20 10:40 10:45 11:05 I 11:09 -11:09 min. & 4.5 sec. 11:09 min. & 11 ec. -11:09 min. 19.6 ec. 'jjl !-;, 11:09 min. 33 RC! . ,,... 11:09 min. 53 se . 0 11 :10 " " ,_.11:15 -_ 11:25 11:35 -12:1J PM -12:40 2:05 2:25 3:10 -3:25 3:55 -----.. *Th .. -... 1 ll*Pitt fr It" *Wt DA E 11-15 77 ... " -" " " II " II " II " " -" " II " " I " " t----* . .. ttnt--: 't *** In !'AGE LOCA TEST TE?J.' CAU! '!'IC HATEl PRES. URE TE!tl? LEVEl 1111 I. .11<11111)(! 63°F 6'i" 250°F " " " II " 12'J 0 1 " II " JOO"I " 321l"! 75 115 fl" 31,0°1 flf) 123 7't 31, 3(11 60 125 " -3/i 7°r 75 122 II 31, 0°1* II 115 " II 70 JOJ II --II II IOJ 200 " - 1 II OJ-1011 II II ' V10-2 75 OJ-10 " " " " " -=1 " 70 II " " II II ---" " 03-10 II ' " 140°1*1_ --* .II , ., ------120°!* 4 ----r-----120°r-_ ...... ...... 'i'J" ----.. f* Ptltttl'\ .. .._,. ft1 -Ph 10.5 " " " " " " " II " -" " -" " II " II " " -.I. , . St1ITCH !' 61 E.\180-11302 EZ10607-23. c s Start pr hent hambe . (ii Pre he It 250 . Drop te nperat ire Chnmber ll:lt S!'Ji e It took 11 Sl' *onds l20°F t l . nc.co ding but @ J ,oo ... t IC! pre sure --. i I I I I rom o TV I llas ! lJ I, I .. Ad 1 m1 t t the tf.r1cl<' t (' h1riernt 1rt' _1u 1p 6 °F I Jl10l'F I ' Control Oil I rump on I i ' I I I ! Jlroo tl* ..... ru* "' c-f rJ I Al r rir<' ;sure 1 flol In chnni er. I I I Add eol 1tton t£ I I ! ' ' .* .. ' ,* ,* DATE. ____ 11_-_1_)_-_,, ________ __ PAGE 4 SUITCH !' __ H ____ _ 1-n EAlB0-11302 LOCA D----'----- LOCA TEST EZ10607-23 HA!El i TIM:: TI ::. DA E TEM PRES. URE FLOH TEHl' LEVE I Ph C( s . 4:20 PU 11-15 77 l20°F iH f[ 7'1Cllom r S!t" 10.5 Stnrt 1 e9t. I 4:24 " " II II " I -* 4:24 111n. ' 7.S ! ac. " 300°1-' 75 -II " 4:24 *In. ' 9.98 sec. II 323°F RO 100 " " ... 12.4 " 31,0°F S.5 105 8" " 3l:9°F -. .. 22.4 r t;lC:. .. 90 125 " II I I . " 57.4 ! ec. " 342°r1 65 110 " II I 4:25 " 340°F 70 101, 7\s" II Control ot 341 OF I .,, 4: 30 " 140-311' " 03-10'. 200 II II Started contrc 1 I 4:35 II II II II II " " Ste?nm b1 Her 1 ff. PJmp on '°"4:40 II " II 1,0°r I I . 00-10 II II Control er @ I o 4:4S " ;40-34 II 03-10'. " II " I ... -" )110-34 I II " II II II . I . -I -s:20 II II II " II " II Control @ . J5oF -<!r t -s:45 II II II II II II II II I I -6:20 II " II II II, II II II I . -6:50 ., .. II II II II II II II -7:30 II II II II II " II l>ror COi trol Io 330< F I 7:35 I " 35-3h 55 97-99 " II II Control (!1" @ l25°F I I I --7:40 " 10-JJ 53 90-1)2 II " II " ( *t20"F I ----------------7:45 .. '.jf) 113-R4 II II II II : l5 1'F ! ', I ---I ! 7:55 II 20-12 1,0 76-77 II II " II II I I, II ------"W ! l'J:OO II II " II " II " II ' ----* 11 :00 II I "SI 1-3 2 JO 67 II . " I J05"F I i. v I ----i.--*-----1 7 *-:--' ' 11:05 .. I

  • 1tn
  • 2; II I l**11*, 0 r*' I 'j]. II . ' ' --------e.. t *** ""'*-, ___ ....... -.,. ....... '

DATE ____ 11_-_15_-_1_1 ________ _ !>AGE 5 J*71 LOCAf. __ LOCA TEST ELAPjED ,-CAW '!'IC TIME. TU:. DA' tE TEM PRES. URE FLOH TE ff? . lITIT: Chamb* r 11: 10 PH 11-15 ,...77 13 47 200 11:15 " 286 5 41 " 11:20 " 273 0 35 " 11:25 " !J70-2h -5 30 11:30 " -10 25 " 12: 15 l\H 11-16 .. 77 1151-2511 -27 " -7:35 A:-1 " )50-251> 5-26 " 7:45 " " " " -.,, 9:00 " " " " 10: )0 " " " " ':" 11: 1!i " " " " 0 12: 15 PM " " " " . *: J: 55 . " " " " Vt 6:00 " " " " t - --" " " " ---10:00 ., " " " ---12:00 AM . 11-17 77 " " " -7:40 A:f " " " " --:j_ 8:110 " " " " ------11: JO " " " -------2: 4 s 1'!*1 ' " " " -r-*--J:JO " " " " -1= -i-6:00 " " " " R:OO --II " " " ndtcnlr.s --* ;-;;t,:j, tlif \ rr.ntl!'I '!l:f t n *The en Ubrnt ton th1 t ln11t1 umrnt -HATEI LEVEi Ph c 71,," 10.4 Control 7" " " " " " . " " " " " " " " " 16-3/4' " " " " *tcmovcd l\: .. " " " " " " -" " " " -" " " " ----" " " " 6'!" " " " " " ----" IO. I --" " ft II ----.. " ---. ' SUITCH ,.. __ 61 ____ _ s i er @ I 7SoF . ' 65°F' I . 55°F 50°F 1,a 0 r I 45°F I I I *

  • wit1 um
1 s we Sf elect 11ca.L me ".I. I l'. !>

I j . I I ! I I I I I ! I /'1! I I .'h'! V' .. I I I . .. . . I I I I

  • e DATE' 11-17-77 ------------------------

PAGE 6' SHITCH A 61 ----------------- 1-n LOCA C ______ _ LOCA TEST -TIME ELAP$ED J '!"IC HATEf I TIME DA E TE?1'1 ) PRES

  • URE FLm*T LEVEi Ph c 11NF.N1 s I . . fjlff>! Tii iiiiilli r 10:00 PH 11-1 77 )50-25> 25-26 200 6 1 2 11 10.1 I -12:00 ... " II " 6-J/R' .. I . 7:35 AH 11-H --11 " " C.'r." " -12:15 PH " " " " " " 1:30 " " " " " " I -* 3:00 " " " " " " I I 3:55 I " " " " " ... I 6:00 " " " " " " I --"'rl 8:00 " " " " II .. I I l; 10:00 " " " " I I ..... 12:00 Alt 11-19-77 " " " " " I I i ...... ..... 7: 30 l\H " " " " I)" " I I H'l9:40 " " " " " " . I I I -Vt 10: 30 " " " " " " I I a 12:07 PM '-----** " " " ,, " "

tC'm l, h !) C:i:OUl ! l cu 11 pumv w: ---Swl ch w u1 ver clNl nsl e 1 Ill: 1 ore> 1 un:.11 1 Ill l\*w ** "-= ..... and tC'mp*rntur ch nm -1: 10 PH . 150°1* 10 rs %% R nle I 1:45 " :wn"r* " " I I 3:45 I " " " " I I I 7:35 AU 11-2 -77 " " " I I I ,-----* l)t.o,. ----8:40 I J 1-7. -77 =i" " I I * -----I 3:45 " -0 /l! -5:05 l';I " R9°C 'l(1!t I f SJ I I I 12:05 AM IJ2 1 t --12 rs 95% I I l I . I I Rrv<'n ---I "The cn llbrot ion th 1t thh1 Jnnt rrncls 11 h I nl I I I L-. ------ D ._. 11-28-77 PAGE __ 1 ___ _ J*'ll LOCA LOCA TEST TIME ELAP: TI Mr DA E TEM ) l?RES URE . 7r5S AH 11-28-71 9B 0 c I Jilt. (2 PS J 8:00 ... 94°C 10 r: 12:30 Ptl II 2:00 " 94°C 10 PSI 3:45 II II II 7:45 AH 11-29 17 II II -12:45 PH II II II 1:15 II II " 3:55 II II II 7:35 AH ll-30 77 " II II> 3:50 PH " " II -7:35 AH 12-1-7 94°c II 0 3:55 PM II II II

  • 7: 35 A.'I .. 12-2-7 " " -3:'50 PH II " " -I 7:45 AH 12-3-7 " " . --3: 30 PH II II " -7:55 AH J2-5-7 II II I 3:45 PU " " " 7: 50 A?I 12-6-r " " -3:45 PH II " 8:00 A!'I 12-7-. 7 II II *---3: JO II _, -8:00 .VI J 2-1'-7 " " CAW !IC HATEl FLOH TEMP LEVEl Ph Shut down I 96'.'! 967. Sys ten II II II Ac ti ated . witch " Back to tc1 JI. an1 II " II II -II II II " . " " " " " -----II ---" SUITCH !1 __ 6_1 ____ _ cdMMF.N1S ystem spray n>t wor ing. . hack to temr>. spindle on 14t h day LOC ". I prc!lsur "* I I I i ' i I I . I I I i I i I I I I I
  • t . I J' . -' I I I . ' . . I I I I DATE _____

____ __ !'AGE 8 _ __,;;; _____ _ 1*71 LOCA t-______ _ LOCA TEST ELA:;tED CAU: TIM! Tl. DA E TEM PRES! URE FLOH . 11111 :-ct'lilmu 2:30 PM 12-8-7 94°C 10 PSl 96: 3: 40 .. " . " " " 8:00 AH 12-9* 77 60°C 5 PSJ -11:00 II N°c 10 PS !J61. J:OO PM " " " II 7: JS A.'I 12-1' -77 II " " J:OO P:I II " II " 7:4S AH 12-1 -77 " II II ".U 3:00 Mi " " II II 8:00 NI 12-1' -77 II " II .,.; 3:00 PM .. II " " .. 0 7:0 Ml 12-1' -77 II " II .. . II 1 .... J:OO P:I " II " Vt " 7:45 NI 12-JI -77 II " -...:;;. 8: )0 NI " II " " -The ! witch held I In rr.r nmour t of n >li1tur i? whl'n rcmnv co nm ct or < nd. *he mol r,lurc !Was 111nd t 1e lcn Wfrl' I . ---=1= ----------*1 --* -*----I .. ' -'!'IC HATEJ LEVE1 Ph c. Hose broke on sy. tern duri 1\ef>TI ea sy *l.t::lll"' 1J.J. lhlVt:: Frida

  • 12-6-77 nstead o -Rem ve RW tch £1 om chnmh I nr. th1 fl 1 nl' rrom I he . *----*-------* ---

s 1g the night .u '""' o:>W f Tlrur I I I I I I I ' , . I l.l: II v 2-15-'7. . I I I ! I I ' / *. .;. i I I I I I I i I ' I I I I i I ! i ,,--., I I . -. *

    • --. e December 19, 1977 QUALIFICATION OF IEEE STANDARD 323, 344 AND 382 USING WESTINGHOUSE LOCA PROFILE LIMIT SWITCH /!61 The switch passed the heat aging, wear cycle, irradiation, seismic and high pressure LOCA test. Checking the switch on 12/16/77, after the low pressure and temperature LOCA test at 10 PSI and 200°F,*the open contact resistance was 50 Kohrns. There was a 2.5 to 3.5 Milliampere current leakage on the open contacts.

The closed contacts passed .086 amps current. The switch was heat aged at 200°F in a high humidity chamber from 9/22/77 to 10/3/77. The open contact resistance on a Meggar instrument measured abov_e 1000 Megohms . (Infinity) before and after the heat age test and the closed contacts passed a current of .086 amps at 100 volts DC. The switch was wear cycle using a cam to actuate was .5 Amps @ 100 V.D.C. 10/3/77 to 10/4/77. tested for 100,000 cycles at 70 RPM the lever arm, The load on the switch The switch was wear tested from The open contact resistance was over 1000 Megohms (Infinity) . and the closed contact current was .086 amps before and after the test. The switch was.irradiated at Isomedix, Inc. from 10/6/77 to 10/26/77. The switch was irradiated at Isomedix. I"c. with a cobalt 60 source. The total irradiation.applied was 204 Mr ads with an energy level of 1. 25 Mev. at *. 7 Mrad/hour rate. The open and closed contact resistance and current were the same value as before the test. The switch was seismic tested by Dr. Edward J. Walter & Associates. The* seismic tests consisted of resonance scan, fracility test* and plant induced vibration simulation. The switch was LOCA tested on 11/15/77 in a high pressure chamber and on 11/19/77 was removed from the chamber and installed in the low temperature and pressure chamber until 12/15/77. The LOCA was extended to 12/16/77 because the low pressure and temperature chamber was down for repair for part of a day . The open contact res:f.stnncc was above 1. 000 Meohms (Infinity) before both LOCA spikes of 340°F and 70 PSI sure. but when the temperature and prcrisurc 1'1crc at the maximum the resistance dropped to a low of 10 Mcohms on the first spike __ _ ___ and 800Kohms on the second spike. (: i "141 ** .. , i * \ .. When the chamber temperature was decreased to 250°F the open contact resistance w::is 900 Meeohms .. .. The pipe that held the lead wires to the exterior connector was reciovcd exposing the interior of the switch to the outside atmosphere surrounding the chamber. The resistance then creased beyond 1000 Hegohrns (Infinity) and remained above 1000 Megohms until the" switch was removed from the chamber and in.stalled in the low temperature and pressure chamber. The switch lever arm was activated on the 14th day of the LOCA 11/29/77 while in the low pressure and temperature LOCA 200°F and 10 PSI. The activation was according to IEEE specifications. The switch was removed from the low temperature and pressure chamber at*the end of the LOCA on 12/16/77. I. When removing the sealed connector pipe moisture had entered the switch around the contact block but there was not enough moisture to drip from the switch. The closed contacts passed .086 amps current and there was a slight leakage of current, 2.5 to 3.5 Milliamps across the open contacts. The resistance across the open contacts had dropped to 50 Kohms. The switch was "bub.ble tested with 12 pound of air and there was no detection of leakage. The open contact leakage current dropped from 3.5 Milliamps to .5 Milliamps the 12 pounds of air to the switch. *The torque to remove the top cover screws was 8 to 13 lb.inches while the torque required to remove the bottom cover screws was 4 to 8 lb.inches. The top cover gasket was moist and had a tacky substance on the inside surf ace bridging from one center screw hole to the opposite center screw hole. The bottom gasket was cracked at the center housing support and moisture was present in the bottom housing. There is a sibility that leakage occurred at one or both bottom cover screws at the connector end of the switch. When, the gaskets dried they became very brittle. The contacts had a residue on these surf aces but were reasonably The contact block was also clean but held film of moisture. The boot cracked when removing it from the spindle. . The spindle 0-ring was in good.condition was resilient. The oil was present on the shoft 0-ring. The grease was present on all sliding surfaces. J. J. Patsey ..

  • . *:*--APPENDIX E Equipment Used And Calibration Dates *

........ ( ... EQUIPMENT CALIBRATED Tektronix Model 564 Oscilliscope (Time Base) 9/6/77 Shure Model 62 CP Accelerometer 7/77 Seismic Test Circuit (Time Base) 8/10/77 Weston Model 912 A.C. Ammeter (Ser. #1943-27) 7/22/76 Biddle "Megger" Model 8679ARK 10/14/77 Weston Model 912 A.C. Voltmeter (Ser. #93607/26) 11/14/77 Weston Model 912

  • D. C. Voltmeter (Ser. ff93851-26) 11/16/77 . Weston Model 912 D. C. Ammeter (Ser.

11/16/77 Brooks Flow Meter Model 110-0SFlBlA (Ser. #7608H66892) 9/14/76 Brooks Flow Meter Model 1110-0SFlAlA (Ser. #7708H37890) 5/8/78 U.S. Pressure Gauge* Thermocouple and YEW Type 2809 Digital Readout (Ser. ff9028) Sears Pressure Gauge Video Logic Video Tape System (Time Base) Thermometer (Heat Aging) Thermometer (LOCA) Marsh Master Gauge (E0252B) WThe calibration indicates that this instrument reads seven PSI too high. See Appendix D, pages 8-11. Page 1 of 1 (E) 11/21/77 8/11/76 11/19/77 11/19/77 11/lG/77 11/21 /77 12/2/76 .... . ---APPENDIX F Supplementary Testing For Short Travel S"l.-:ritches ---r-. __/}__,17'-L____ ... *. r* .. Those switches of the EA-180 series which contain a short travel mechanism differ internally from the standard travel versions in some respects. It was, therefore, felt that it was necessary to test a short travel model up through the seismic portion of the test in order to verify that the internal mechanism of this switch was not subject to seismic failure. The tests conducted were the same as those conducted on the switch fr61 in the body of the report except that the LOCA tests were not perfonned. The short travel switch which 't*1as tested (ffa83, Model EA-1'80-14302, Rev. C) maintained optimal electrical perfornance throughout all portions of this test. During the seisr.iic ing the trip position of this s*witch was observed to change -as noted in the seismic report. The maximum change was .107" and the direction of change was such that the switch would actuate earlier in the tripping cycle than it had orior to the seismic testing. Cross coupling tests were not necessary for this switch as they were for the long travel mechanism. This was because the parts #75, 80 and 81 of the normal long travel mechanism (see page 5 of the main body of the report) are not present in this switch, and part 62 which replaces these parts is not sub-ject to movement in the X axis. It was not *considered necessary to LOCA test this switch because short travel versions of the switch covered in the main body of this report will be built with identical sealing mechanisms gaskets and 0-rings) to switch '61. Pag.e 1 of 11 (F ) r ..P n _. __ _ e e {::::J ...... ******** -;260/.255 DIA. 4 HOLES I --. ' l / " ' ; B .4i4 1.80 REF. J'ce.ePr10N o,t;T/I 48 rcerll J'Pjllc£o

  • 410/* 4CP5 O*O* Page 2 of 11 (F) *
  • HEf'. EZ/OQ:.07-2.3 NA.IVJCO CONTRC:l-5 ILESS OTHERWISE S .. ECIFICD D*. "'C iE1An Acrne*Clfl;,,elanc:I ComPsrtY DIMENSIONS

"'1 OTT CLCVELAND OHIO u A .XX :t: .01 .. a. ..,._ * .xxx = .oos '11TU .&;2400 ANGULAR ::t: 0*30* Jf.oeT 7Z?,QJ/*(. (;; 11! 0 re1p *EMOVE ALL SHARr CDGCS L MACHINED SUHf'ACES

    • v 1 MATIClllAI.

DO NOT SCALE /). --..

._ ... e March l, 1978 TEST FOR SHORT TRAVEL SWITCH //83-51, EZ1067-51/EA18014302 Switch #83-51 is equivalent, except for the latching mechanism, to the standard version EZ10607-15, #53, which passed the qualification test on November, 1977. Switch #83-51 was subjected to and passed heat aging, life cycling, irradiation and seismic testing. The switch was heat aged at 200°F in a high humidity chamber from 12/23/77 to 1/1/78. The open contact resistance on a Meggar instrument measured above 1000 megohms (infinity) before and after the heat age test and the closed contacts passed a current of .086 amps at 100 V.D.C. The switch was wear life cycle tested for 100,000 cycles at 70 RPM using a cam to actuate the lever arm. The load on the switch was .5 amps@ 100 V.D.C. The test was from 1/3/78 to 1/4/78. After the wear cycle test the contact resistance was over 1000 megohms (infinity) and the closed contact current was .086 amps. The switch was irradiated at Isomedix, Inc. from 1/12/78 to 1/31/78. The switch was irradiated with a cobalt 60 source. The total irradiation applied was 204 Mrads with an energy level of 1.25 Mev. at 1.2 Mrad/hr. rate. The open and closed contact resistance and current were the same values as before the irradiation test. The switch was seismic tested by Dr. Edward J. Walter & Associates from 2/1/78 to 2/13/78. The seismic tests consisted of resonance scan, fragility test and plant induced vibration simulation.
  • After the seismic test the open contact resistance was above lOOD-megohms (infinity).

Before and after the seismic test the closed contacts passed a current of .086 amps at 100 V.D.C. The test p*rogram for switch #83-51 was completed on 2/13/78. The data is attached. J. J. Page 3 of 11 (F) Patsey . I

... . . . . ... e HEAT AGING I . . , DATE 12/23/77 SWITCH # . 83-51 J*71 HODEL C EA-180-143 t:::J PROTOTYPE

!Zl060751 c:::=i PRODUCTION . ... T .. I --*--Tb ... . *--r-... , ... . -I 1 *

  • TIME DAh rEk. I

.. '.'_ ani

  • . el:_ ------. ..::.=

lorquer* to i u ID. i10-:--I 12:30 PM 12-23-117 200°F The i sket l:tulrd . 016" rom t ne pla e. The ttom slas et ad a 044" bulge rom 26-177 II the 12-28-t77 II -I . 12-31-177 II ' 9:35 AM l-3-7E " Remo ved s" itch I I .. ELECTRICALS I LOAD = ! . 086AI@ 100 lvnc t Meggar

  • I I l I I I 1 3 2 4 1 3 2 4 INITIAL . I Inf Inf Inf Inf .086 .086 .* 086 .086 FIN AL " II " II II II ti II OTHER . I (\'.:ontinuc on back EXAHINATION (OPTIONAL)

I I I GASKETS: . I I . -*-* I I I CONTACTS: I BLOCK: .. .. __ ,. ___ *---.. 0-R.ING: . I I\_ A(') .... GREASE: I & --****---"P.i t. 11 O -... --* -----*** ( C'.nn t ' nn h,.,.\r"\

--... *-** DATE 1-3-78 1-7' C=1 PROTOTYPE C:=J PRODUCTION WEAR CYCLING SWITCH 83-51 ----1 HODEL ' EAl.80-1430 EZ10607-51 I I I OF CYCLES lC0,000 -. I r-C_Y_C-LE __ METHOD !cam I I .I _____ E_LE_CT_RICAL LOAD =! ' -os6A @ ioo!I vnc I I I " I .1 I ___ 2 I 4 13 I 2. 4 I I ! I 1 3 _08_6___._-_0_86--+._0_86_1-0_86__..__--r-----..;.--1---1-i FINAL II II .. .. II II .. .. n OTHER

  • I I fxAMINATION -I 1 (Continue bn GASKETS:

I BLOCK:

  • CREASE: Page of ll (F) . ---------*** -.. ---.. *-. --. *-. -.. -(continue on bnck) ,.

.* .* .: .. .a ., -C;:: .. ___ , --------*-.. DATE 1-31-78 . SWITCH i 83-51 . J-71 J:] PROTOTYPE MODEL EAl.80-1430' t:J PRODUCTION IRRADIATION EZ10607-51 I --1--n-* I --l*--r ---. J .. l--, I I I I ---* ---* -*------* -. --* -. IRRADIATED AT: IsoDK dix, l nc. -. -I FROM i-12-t8 I TO 11-31-r8 TOTAL IRRADIATION '204 Mrad. i I ENERGY LEVEL l. 25 Me.J. SOURCE Cobalt 60 gamma RATE l.2 Mrad/ht. i I -.. -. --iLoAI>I ,,_ 08pA @ DC I I ELECTRIDAL MEASUREMENTS I I ; COMMENTS : I I Me, ear (Condtictivl.ty (amps) 1 3 2 4 1 3 2 4 I I INITIAL Inf Inf ' Inf Inf .086 .086 .086 . 086 I FINAL " " II II " " II " OTHER I ' I I INTERIOR (OPTIONAL) I Gaskets: I .. CONTACTS: I ._ ' BLOCK: I ---... --* -. *-* 0-RING: . -* CREASE: .. .. COMMENTS (Cont. . Q_i_ ' -* -l J ----------Page 6 of 1 (F) . ,,con t.inuc on .. -***:a ....... ., .. \;;; rrlJu ISOMECIX February 6, 1978 Mr. Edward L. Solem Metallurey Engineer Acme-Cleveland Development Co. 625 Alpha Drive Highland Heights, Ohio 44143

Dear Mr. Solem:

This will summarize parameters pertinent to the irradiation of three switches per your purchase order no. DC-97214, dated January 12, 1978. The units were identified as switches 81A, 82A, and 83. The switches were placed in a cobalt-60 gamma field at a dose rate e 1.2 Nrad per hour. The* switches were exposed for 170.0 hours, ::,:;_:;_:_:_:* y"ielding a minimum dose of 204 megarads * . Dosimetry was performed using an Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) Red Perspex.system with Type BC.:-2 readout. Calibration of the Perspex is made by AECL using Ceric. dosimetry traceable to the U.S. National Bureau of Standards. Isornedix ca1ibrates its .AECL system with an inhouse Harwell Perspex system, and makes semi-annual calibrations directly with NBS, using the NBS Radiochromic Dye.system. A copy of the dosimetry correlation port is available upon request. irradintion was conducted in air ambient temperature and pressure. Radiant beat from the source heated the samples somewhat, but the temperature did not exceed *100°F, as indicated by previous ments_ on an oil solution in the same relative position.

  • Irradiation was initiated on January* 15, 1978, and was completed on January 26, 1978 *. *
  • lsomodbc Inc.
  • 25 Cnslm:tns no:td, Pnrslppnny, Nr.w Jorscy 087*4700 CfllCAGO DIVISION
  • nn "'"" .... u0111o11 0.9'* . .._,,HOU l)tJt "'""'°
    • --DATE 2-13-78 J-0 PROTOTYPE CJ PRODUCTION SPECIAL PARTS: --** -*--TESTED BY: -REPORT REF. : GASKETS CONTACTS BLOCK 0-RING Before seismic 2-After seismic 2-1 SWITCH 83-51 ------MODEL EAl.80-1430 EZ10607-51 SEISMIC TESTING I I I

-*-. . .... I *-. I -r r* I I I I I I I I I -*Dr.

  • ,

.. ---.. . -... . -.:.:. *:.=...

  • ---*-* .-I I I I ' F I I ! I I I -IEEE Standard 323, and ls2 i I I . -. "' ' I I I ! I I I INTERNAL EXA'l'UNATION (OPTIONAL)

' I I I I I I . I I I I I : I I 1 ** .. COMJ'ofl:NTS ! Elec ricali Me22a Conduc: r.ivHv (a."llPS 1 3 2 4 1 3 2 4 1-78 Inf Inf Inf Inf .086 .086 .086 .086 *-* 3-78 .. .. n .. " " " .. . . . --. \ -((: --_j, ' -*-. Page of 1: (F) ---*--. i : ...... .... ., !Jr. ttfrvnrd J.. Z.Vnltcr Associnlcs 1/ibrnlio11 n11d So1111tf Co11s11/tn11/s . . . P.O. BOX 171

  • CHESTER LANO, OHIO 44026
  • TELEPHONE:

(216) 729*7415 Vibration Test of Limit Control Svitch NAMCO Controls An Acme-Cleveland Company January, 1978 Re:f crence A detailed description of the vibration testine equipment end test procedures is given in our report of June, 1977, Seismic of Limit Control Svitches, prepared for NAMCO Controls * . CURRENT SWITCH TEST Switch No. 83, EA 180-14302 TESTS The switch subjected to the following tests: I -Fragility Test Frequency Hz 1.0 1.25 1.6 2.0 2.5 Ji.o 5.0 6.*3 a.o 10.0 12.5 16.o 20.0 Vibration Specification Displacement -12.1 inches pp giving 9.52 e's ac.celerntion nt 4 Acceleration 9.52 or grcotcr Displacement -8.o inches pp Displacement -5.0 inches :pp Displ.Scc:mcnt -3.0 inches pp Di!;plncement -2.0 inches PP Displncemcnt -o.45 inches pp es above as nbove Displacement - inches pp civing occclcrotion 9.52 e's or 8renter. Pace 9 of 11 (F) . . I

  • -*-II -Plant Induced Vibration Simu1atibn The switch was vibrated at a non-resonant 6 frequency, 100 Hz at an acceleration 1.3 g for a total of 10 cycles, one third of the cycles in each X, Y, and z. Test Procedure:

The switch was tested in each of three mutually perpendicular directions, designated X, Y, and Z, parallel to the major axes of the switch. In each orientation, the fragility dwell test and the plant induced vibration simulation test were made. In the Fragility Dwell test the switch contacts were monitored. Both the Normally Open (NO) contacts and the Normally Closed (NC) contacts were monitored for seismic failure by means of a light indicator circuit. No seismic failure occurred during the tests. The trip angle of the switch was also monitored during the test at both the normally Open (NO) contacts and the Normally Closed (NC) contacts. The Normally Open (NO) contacts were monitored first. The switch was actuated and subjected to vibration for a minimum of 30 seconds. Next, the Normally Closed (NC) contacts were monitored with the switch unactuated and subjected to vibration for a minimum of 30 seconds. Total vibration time was a minimum of 60 seconds. This procedure was repeated for each frequency of the fragility dwell test. The trip position remained within 1/16 inch throughout the test procedure with the following three. exceptions:

  • . . Changes in Trip Position which exceeded 1/16 inch Y-comp. Frequency Hz Total Change :1n inches 16 25 32 Page 10 of ll(F) .107 early .080 early .107 early
  • . ***A ..... . ... In the Plant Induced Vibration Simulation test, the switch was vibrated at a non-resonant 6 frequency, 100 Hz, at an acceleration of i.3 g, for a minimum of 10 cycles. F.ach canponent, X, Y, and Z was 6 subjected to one third of the total number of cycles, e.g. l/3 x :* 10 cycles.
  • The switch was a double throw type and was energized electrically at 125 volts at 1/2 amp. during the test. It was subjected to 51 tinct vibration tests, 48 of these at a minimum of 60 seconds each and three at a minimum of 56 minutes each. Page 11 of 11 (F)

APPENDIX G TEST HISTORY OF SEISMIC TEST UNITS (: ....... . t" ..A IJ . -. *.. *. . ---*-. . :**-HEAT AGING I . . , DATE 2/14/77 SWITCII I . 32 EAl.8011302 J*71 HODEL I C=:J PROTOTYPE c:=I PRODUCTION ....... -. --2;3>77T -., -.. . Tb--. . I FROM t+/- I

  • DAfE ***r TIME

---. --3:00 PM 2/3/: 7 . 180( IF . -4:00 PM . II 200( I 200c . ! 2/111 77 fF . "t ........ -* --12:30 PM 2/141 77 200cF . I I ELi;:cTRICALS i LOAD -!.52 & 100 VAC. ' Meggar I I I l" Dit>e S ainlei s 1 3 2 4 1 3 2 4 IA-H2 an1 C8t) ' S309 I INITIAL .. Inf Inf Inf Inf Light: Lights 11.ights .. ighu useJ to s1 al vi Jes us111 FINAL 12M l(}f 7 M 15 M '.52

  • 52 .52 .52 on witch* s 30. 31. 3: i OTHER and 33. I ..
  • I bacJC) (Continue on l'!ASKETS*

INTERIOR! EXA."ilNATION (OPTIONAL)

  • 1.*. I I I I . -. I I I l I I .. -----,.. CONTACTS:

Gold *on tac a. BLOCK: Premi 3001D -...... *-... 0-JlING: . . (' r\ ,/, -GREASE: v *-**** -Patte 1 of H (C) . . -------* I l;nnT' 1 1' .... 1r' nn ..... . . . . 3/4/77 . DATE . SWITCH , 32 . J-7J J:] PROTOTYPE MODEL EA-18011 t:J PRODUCTION IRRADIATION I *1-n-II *----, .. , -. . . -, --.. ---, --I I I I I I . -*-*-. --------. IRRADIATED AT: l*O'll edix, I -I I I . I -I I : FROM 21221h I TO I 2121 trn TOTAL IRRADIATION I 204 MJ:ad. i ENERGY LEVEL l.25 Miv SOURCE cbbalt 150 ! RATE 2 Mr'.ad /hr* I I --*--** .. --Ampi& lOOiVAC. ELECTRICAL MEASUREMENTS

iLOAD! .. C0!-21EN'TS I I I I Me ,gar (Conductivity (amps) I I 1 3 2 4 l 3 ! 2 4 I INITIAL 12 M lOM 7M 15M .52 .52 .52 .52 FINAL Inf Inf Inf Inf Inf .52 .s2 .52 . I .\ OTHER j
1 I I I I I *-I INTERIOR (OPTIONAL)

I I I '. Gaskets: I I : I ' I . . ... L CONTACTS: I I I I BLOCK: : 0-RING: .

  • GREASE: .. -* . COMMENTS (Cont.' -' ,..., () i >{-I ';1 ii -. I . I Page 2 of 12 (C) .continue on b.ick 1
.. e \::::: .. DATE 3/24/77 J-71 c:::J PRODUCTION

---# OF CYCLES -CYCLE RATE 70 RPI -----*O METHOD Cam s tui> 'WEAR CYCLIHG ---I . LOADj .SA 120V I I I . 1 I SWITCH !! __ 32 __ _ HODEL {I EA18011302 I --r--11--... -I -r-I COMMENTS I I I Start tes1 2:00 IP!-{ I Finis ed te t 2:od PM ELECTRICAL MEASUP.L'1ENTS; LOAD s:i

  • 52 100 lAC I I I I < I I The rolleJ on tll Conductivity " bras& 1 3 I 2 I 4 1 3 I 2 4 levJr arm Lore th.at I INITIAL Inf Inf Inf Inf .52 .52 .52 .52 som1 time Jfter '1.ooo I FINAL Inf Inf Inf Inf .52 .52 .52
  • 52 cvcJ es . OTHER * .. . . I I* I .. . . I *-. . ' ii INTERNAL EXA:1INATION I I : baCl.: I (Ccntinue.on I I GASKETS: I i I
  • I 1 CONTACTS:

BLOCK: -. 111 0-R.INg: ( r\. (. "' -GREASE: v . I ...... -*---------* ---**-. ------**---*--Page 3 of 1Z (C) (continue on back) : I . I

  • . . . . *------*---* DATE ___

SWITCH 32 l*C!J PROTOTYPE c::::1 PRODUCTION TESTED BY: REPORT REF. : GASKETS CONTACTS I MODEL V.18011302 SEISMIC TESTING Dr. hlter Ion 6/In7. I IEEE* 82 sundard loraft 12. Revision 0, Apr 1 10, 1975 4nd IEE£ 344*. I I . I I INTERNAL EXAMINATION (OPTiONAL) BLOCK 0-RING I COMMENTS . /) l /{--P*ge 4 of 12 (C) v -ti I -- !

____ _ J-71 C:=:J PROTOTYPE c=:J PRODUCTION . HEAT I 33 . SWITCH I -----* HODEL I EZ10607-2 , .... :-_--:-::_M_** ___ :l+/-+/-:L amoud of Vi ter* oJ the J..ttam Lnd arl>und r the res. be on ....... the btock. I 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 2/3/ 7 " 3:00 PM 2/11 77 The 1Df gger 1 heck c roppe from II.nfini y to

  • 12:30 PM 2/14 77 .

I . __ __ __ __ __ p_& __ I I t

  • I I

__ I i 3 2 4 i 3 2 4' 1 INITIAL . Inf Inf Inf Inf ILightdLights,..ights Light. ! FIN AL ! ' i i i I I i I I

  • I I i I _____________

__.,,. ___ .......... OTIIER I (Continue on back GASKETS: INTERIOR! EXAHINATION ' 1/16" asbesl os ga kets c n top and The tc gasl et gh ed to he to> plate and c rred or 2 t rs. @ 180°F. CONTACTS: Gold ontac s. BLOCK: 3001 -* *-_--1""! RING: ( ¥< Page S of ll2 (C) fContJnnP nn

. .. . . DATE 3/4/77 . SWITCH . 33 EZl0607-2 J-71 CJ PROTOTYPE MODEL ----*-t:J PRODUCTION IRRADIATION I I I I I I I --1-n* I I :,.-l**--*r-****:**r

.. -r L ... -I I I I I I I -*---*----*-------. . -.. -** .. . IRRADIATED AT: Isomt dix 1 l 1nc. -. . I FROM 2/2*/77 I TO 121211717 TOTAL IRP.ADIATION ! 204 I ENERGY LEVEL ii2s SOURCE cl:>balt 160 I RATE 2 Mrad/hrl. I I I *--. --. ILOADI ELECTRICAL MEASUREMENTS i ... $ Amps! ioo v*c COMMENTS I I Me, gar I Kconductiv'ity I INITIAL 1 3 2 4 1 3 2 4 17M lOM 7M 15M .52

  • 52 .52 .52 I FINAL Inf Inf Inf I Inf .52
  • 52
  • 52 .52 I OTHER I i !INTERIOR EXAMINATION (OPTIONAL)

I l,'1 Gaskets: i' ;, I l i I I I .. I CONTACTS: I i i I . BLOCK: I : ; ---'. 0-RING: : ... I CREASE: --..... COMMENTS (Cont. . rij CT -. p, ge 6

  • f 12 I l****** .

on back ,,..._. .. :*: .* DATE 3/24/77 J-71 . CI:I PROTOTYPE WEAR CYCLING c::J PRODUCTION --. ---.. I-' CYCLES LOAD .SA E 120 71 RPM 1 CYCLE RATE -elm setJp I . . I METHOD -. I I Star test Fini h tes1 SWITCH ff 33 HODEL # EZ10607-2 . 11 I I -, ' I I 2:00 l ?i 3-123-77 2:00 ELECTRICAL MEASUREMENTS; LOAD =! .S2A/lOOVACI I Meggar The re ller i In the brass 1 3 2 4 3 I 2 4 I arm vc loc! fl::i 000 INITIAL Inf Inf Inf Inf .52 .52 52 .52 sometjme af11er 40. FINAL Inf Inf Inf Inf ' .52 .52 52 .52 OTHER * .. . . I* . .. . .. ------iINTERNAL EXAMINATION (OPTIQNAL) I I Continue ___ on I GASKETS: . i

  • I * *. CONTACTS:

-BLOCK: -... . . . ** .. . .. . -_0-R.ING: {, I-<* // -. CREASE: Page t7 of °1 (G) . . *---*-*-*-. -----*--* --* .. ____ _. ____ .... . (continue on back) .. 9 . *------**---DATE S/20/77 J*d PROTOTYPE c::J PRODUCTION SEISMIC TESTING SWITCH .33 -----MODEL EZ10607 I I I I . . I I . I .. . . I *-. -. --I 1--,--, I I I . *-** -------* ----*--* TESTED BY: Dr. Edwa11d Walt1er & !bns at John Univ1rsity SwitK:h OK by Wa ter 01 5/20, 77: REPORT REF. : IEEE 382 st andarc , Dra* 2, 0, A}ril and I I . . INTERNAL EXAHINATION, (OPTIONAL) i GASKETS __ CONTACTS BLOCK 0-RING I .... Page of 1. (C) _ I. t ..... . L::::: DATE S/9/77 J-71 t:=:J PROTOTYPE r--1 PRODUCTION -... r-**1 TIME I>AfE St-7ITCH ,. 45 ----i J'fODEL I F.Al.801130 -*---***-,-., .. TtirP. *I The Jold ---======l:===i===::=:::.-;:.,.*-

9:'oo AM aero s each pther. 8:30 AM 7 The witch iwas ft ee of moistu e whe h remO'\ from canne1 and tested good ell.ectri ally. I Eµ:CTRICALS ! LOAD = ! .53 ' 10ov+c. I N I I I I ______ __ _. ____ ..._ ___ i 3 2 4 -i 3 2 4

  • I __

__ -+-*-5_3-+_._5_3 i Fl N AL 9:45 AM Inf Inf Inf Inf .53 .53 .53 .53 0 THE R on back) INTERIOR!EXAHINATION GASKETS: . I ; CONTACTS: I I ' I BLOCK: : I * -I t I 0-R.ING: / .:. ....

. DATE 5/10/77 J-7J c:::J PROTOTYPE CD PRODUCTION WEAR CYCLING SWITCH ff 4 5 ----HODEL # W.8011302*
  1. OF-CYCLES 100,000 120V ,____. *-

r-CYCLE RATE 7C RPM ! pass heat agingJ I METHOD c.b setu I I . I 1 Roll er on ever lrm vo* e flal

  • LOAD -i .53A I ioovtc. ELECTRICAL MEASUREMENTS; I Me22ar 1 3 2 I 4 I I I 1 3 2 4 INITIAL 5/9/77 Inf Inf Inf Inf .53 .53 .53 .53" FINAL Inf Inf Inf Inf . '.53 .53 .53 .53 OTHER * .1 I I INTERNAL (OPTIONAL).

1 *'Continue on bab I GASKETS: . I CONTACTS: BLOCK: -**"" GREASE: *----------*----

  • -(continue on back) 1-71 CJ PROTOTYPE Jll PRODUCTION

IRRADIATED AT: -FROM 5/17/7' *--* l"'*--Isomt dix, nc. I TO SWITCH _i ---MODF.L !I EA1801U IRRADIATION I I I I -=-n-I I r-* ***--r* .. .,.-. I I I I --*--**--** *-... ... -**** . . . -. I -I TOTAL IRRADIATION I 204 Urad. I . ' ! I ENERGY LEVEL l.25 SOURCE cdbalt 60 I RATE 2 I I I . *-*-** -* *----TtoAol ELECTRICAL i ... j.5 A ! ioo C01'£1ENTS I Me, .gar (Condtictivlty (amps) 1 3 2 4 1 3 2 4 Afre1 i rr.adiat ioli the ! ! INITIAL 5/16/77 Inf Inf Inf Inf .53 .53 .53 *53 was he eke with a geii i FINAL fJ/2/77 Inf Inf Inf .53 .53 .53 53 --... 1'esii11 I Inf The 1 OTHER 6/7/77 tnf Inf Inf Inf .53 .53 .53 ,53 aftet radi* tion. l I I I I I I I ; INTERIOR EXAMINATION (OPTIONAL)

Gaskets: ... ---CONTACTS: i f . I : BLOCK:* . . ., ..

  • I ' .. . . ' I I I *-* -: 0-RING: I ... I CREASE: . . . COMMENTS (Cont.' Vi ( y P' -----irace 1 o( l 2 (C) . . --------------------------

e (/ .. : ... . -. *-----*--- DATE 6/13/77 J-0 PROTOTYPE [=:J PRODUCTION I -**-*-***---TESTED BY: Dr. -REPORT REF. : IEEE GASKETS CONTACTS . ... BLOCK 0-RING '(;REASE ---*--... . . .. . . * . SWITCH I 45 MODEL If EA180-11302-B* .. SEISMIC TESTING I I -.. I I I . -* .. I .. -f -l--1-I t I I ' I I f I I I I I ---** at U1 :ve;s -ty. . .. __ ,__ .. _, !,dward Walte1 & Sor I I . I I -I I ndardJ Draf vision! 0, Ap and IEEE

mzzp 582 St* 2, Rt 11 10 1975 I I I I INTERNAL EJ:AHINATION; (OPTIONAL)

I I I I I . . .. . ' r I . . . . . . I I I .. 1 I . .. . f I COMMENTS -. . 2 of

  • 2 fC) Paste -. (

-!""" --" . -.}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18078A981&oldid=1576297"