ML18089A329

Cycle 5,Startup Test Rept

ML18089A329
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	08/22/1983
From:	Jackson J, Miller L, Rosenfeld E Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	Murley T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
NFG-83-206, NUDOCS 8309070302
Download: ML18089A329 (35)

Text

,

NFG 83-206 Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Nuclear Department August 22, 1983 Doctor Thomas E. Murley Regional Administrator, Region 1 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406

Dear Doctor Murley:

STARTUP TEST REPORT SALEM NO. 1 CYCLE S LICENSE NO. DPR-70 DOCKET NO. 50-272 Attached please find two (2) copies of the Salem No. 1 Cycle 5 Startup Test Report.

Very truly yours, E. A.

Manager -

Nuclear Licensing and Regulation cc:

Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement (36)

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 The Energy People

~.30 7o7o 3o ;;i___

95-21 68 (80 M) 11-82

c

.e

• PS~G

SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNIT 1, CYCLE 5 STA.RTUP TEST REPORT

PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 CYCLE 5 STARTUP TEST REPORT f

.1 r?

REVIEWED BY~_L.._._l_(_._1_v_{,_~*_l_J:.t,_~+S0._.~Jl;=..,__~~~~~~~

Technical Manag r REVIEWED BY_.f:f~.4~.:___J~~~~"'~~::::._:~,--.,,----

List of Tables and ~igures Table 1 Sequential List of all Tests Table 2 Swap mode rod worth comparisons Table 3 Dilution mode rodworth comparisons Table 4 Surmnary of Flux Map Results Figure 1 Reactor Core Map Figure 2 Burnable Poison Loading Pattern Figure 3 Flux Map 1500 FDH and Tilts Figure 4 Flux Map 1'501 FDH and Tilts Figure 5 Flux Map 1502 FDH and Tilts Figure 6 Flux Map 1503 FDH and Tilts Figure 7 Flux Map 1504 FDH and Tilts Figure 8 Flux Map 1505 FDH and Tilts Figure 9 Flux Map 1506 FDH and Tilts Figure 10 Flux Map 1507 FDH and Tilts Appendix A Physics Test Program Descriptions and Acceptance Criteria/Physics Results Sheet.

Introduction The fuel shuffle commenced November 18, 1982 and required the removal of 193 fuel assemblies from the core.

The core unloading was completed 4 days later on November 21.

During the shuffle reactor engineering personnel with the assistance of Q.A. and fuel management group personnel conducted a fuel assembly inspection.

This inspection identified fuel pin ruptures on assembly D-20.

Assembly D-20 was determined to be not reinsertable and a replacement assembly for it was identified.

A lower core plate inspection and loose parts retrieval was conducted.

Some small pieces of grid strap were retrieved and believed to be remnants of cycle 1 grid damage, since no grid strap damage was observed during the unload.

The core reload was started on November 28 and was completed on December 1.

A total of fifty-two (52) new assemblies were loaded.

The new assemblies are located in the core as indicated on the Core Loading Map, Figure 1.

Two Secondary source clusters were loaded into locations H-3 and H-13.

Forty-four (44) new burnable poison inserts, containing a total of 256 burnable poison rods are located as shown in Figure 2.

Two different burnable poison cluster patterns with 4 and 8 rods were utilized.

Page 1

The startup physics test program was conducted to ensure the reactor, as loaded, was performing in accordance with design expectations and safety limitations.

Hot zero power tests were performed on February 14 and February 15, 1983.

Power escalation testing was started February 15 but was not completed until May 28, 1983 due to reactor trip breaker problems and required actions.

Appendix A provides a brief description of each test and a summary of test results relative to acceptance criteria.

Table 1 is a sequential listing of all tests that were conducted during the startup.

Page 2

TYPE Reactor Startup

1.

Zero Power Physics Testing

2.

3.

Power Escalation Testing

4.

5.

6

• 7.

8 *

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

TABLE 1 STARTUP TESTS Postrefueling Initial Criticality Pull control banks with ICRR Plot Dilute to criticality Reactivity computer checkout ARO Boron Endpoint Test ARO Isothermal Temperature Coefficient Measurement ARO Flux Map (#1500)-Flux Map Analysis

& Result Rod Swap Reactivity Measurement (Rod worth)

SORC Review Heat Balance and NIS Calibration Heat Balance and NIS Calibration Flux Map #1502 Flux Maps #1503, 1504 Excore Calibration Power Coefficient Measurement Heat Balance and NIS Calibration Flux Map #1505 Flux Map #1506, 1507 Excore Calibration Power Coefficient Measurement RCS Flow Measurement 26% RTP 47% RTP 47% RTP 47% RTP 47% RTP 47% RTP 75% RTP 100% RTP 100% RTP 100% RTP 100% RTP 100% RTP Page 3

9 ll.

13 14 15

_,44 F'l.127 F'S&

PDil'i I

I I i P!.J6'/

r I

I

,, ::. *1 I I

Pil12S/

I GCl'i 4r* ~~3 I

!) i~\\ I R26 I

I GSl.

I PD iii i 11 1

\\

F40 1

\\ PD18 N

M F (Ju 1: 21 f'D3 PD4 L~)4 RS~*

[;:5'1 BP 1 '/

l\\27

~: 1b

'1 1* 3"/

P0~.2 i

E53 I I

PDc, !

[4;2

'1 i-<44 I I

I F4~' I PD1271 DiO I R03 i I

GJ.6 I BPi.3

• I ESS

~

R6i F25 PD21 Gi.u 81*:.1.8 1>22 "il-1/

G35

'"" 1 1124 R34 l:Jl-'4

[)06 PDE.ti G04 4f'20 D12 1~:42 G39 PDS L

K I

1--u3 i G03 f'Dl 01' PD'75 G3U Pl>S<':.

i I

A20 I I

R J. is I Dii RiOS F23 PD'?4 REACTOR CORE MAP SALEM UNIT 1 DATE:

6/01/83 J

FS2 PD7 G40 4P 12 DO R3S H

G21 PD4S D19 R102 E':::*t>

ss::;

G F3'l J

PD13 I G02 I 4P22 I

I I

I G24 PD23 D25 RS4 G2<? I 4P17 I D02 PIJJ. 0 0 G3i

!:lP3 D3o 1'<3 (/

G:20 81'9 I D2~.

I r>DS9 i

\\

£.45 I,

\\ Pi!J.371 1

1 E34 1,

I~ 132 i

F J.2 1 1

PD73 E48 PD:H E02 RLH F33 41*'9 EO i.

RS<~

F'i S 4P24

[44 I ev1 it; I I

F54 I 4P4 i:::2s PDS2 F44 I I

8P iO E50 PD85 I Fil p flt 0 U8 Rl.12 F36 l'lP i6 cs*;

Ri22 130 8P2 f_.46 R.L?.0 I' 06 4f'LI EiC i

I

)

E3C I I l'DL..:J. I l

I E12 I

\\

'~ 128 P D'/O j

=35

'*:!*':L9 FSO i

I i

\\

I I

U6 F32 4P2i 1~0*1 PD,i?

G4C)1 PDU.'7 !

I D

F42 PDlo c

I i

I F'i4 I I PDSl:l I

I I

B i

G33 I R13'? i 4:*' 11 i

t.52 I

PD:i.~2 \\

i 8:" 14 DOB IU4 Gi2 4 1.*':i

'~

1)113 P D~3o E4'i

'1 G3;~

J 1)1

r..2 8;j6 i

D0'7 l<S8 I

I l Ei3 RL33 i G41 I I BP1i i 1:*34 1"D30 i r;"JS R:S'l I

i EU'?

R43 I

L64 I i'D1311 II, E32 RoO I

G4:.~ I I

i!U/

R49

(.;27 4<'18 I l I I E 2~'. I PD12b I

E04 R4 F46 41"7 F3B 4P5 E28 R38 I E51 I Pli:H I

II D14 PD44 F55 PD48 1~59 I D39 PDZD6 GOB 4P8 DiS R45 G48 PD12 F02 PD43 Ei9 PD19 I

I D28 PD89 Fi6 PD'74 D23 R12 E43 R41 G17 BP15 E33 R149 G28 4Pi4 G07 F41 PD101 PD28 FSJ PD104 Dib R7 E.SB 584 D34 RS6 G06 PDS3 NORTH t Figure l E.36 PDBO G26 BP 19 EiO R 10 G14 4P1 F26 PD11 E15 PD97 I I

D33 I PDi241 F17 l PD115 I D38 R2 GiS PD91 D30 PD79 G2S 4P6 DOi Ri07 G19 PD65 F04 PD114 GSO 41" io D35 Ri43 D37 I I

R27 Gi3 8P8 i G30 I

E59 !

81"12 R150 F11 PD20 FS3 PD32 GOS PD93 F20 PD37 1~01 PD110 Paae 4 I

A F O:.,

PDj.(J._:

G-.H:.

P l!lc"

,: 2A PD63 G4'.I PDS~i F45 f'D26 G46 PD66 F48 F' Df~4

i R

2 3

4 5

6 7

8 goo _._

9 1Q 11 12 13 14 15 e

P.E.7\\C~C'P. COP.E !'A}\\P SALEM UNIT 1 DATE:

6/01/83 p

N M

L K

H G

t:'

t:'

D c

u I

0 180° I

4 4

8 4S 8

8 4

8 8

4 8

4 4

4 4

4 8

4 8

4 8

4 8

8 4

8 4

g

,4 8

4

.4 4

4 4

n.

4 8

8 I 4

8 0

8 4S 8

4 4

I I

oo Number I n di cat es t-.t umber*.of Burn ab 1 e Po i son Rods 256 Fresh BP Ro~s S Indicates Secondary Sourc~ Rod Fig1Jre 2 BURNABLE POISON LOADING PATTERN A

-i-270° Page 5

Zero Power Test Results The zero power test schedule for Cycle 5 was essentially identical to that used during cycle 4.

Once again the rod exchange technique was used for measuring the bank rodworth rather than the traditional boron dilution method.

Comparisons of swap mode rodworth measurements and design values along with review criteria are shown in Table 2.

Comparisons of dilution mode measurements and design values along with acceptance criteria are shown in Table 3.

A Boron end point measurement was conducted with all rods out and was within the +/- 50 ppm acceptance criteria.

The measured value of 1499 ppm was 16 ppm higher than predicted.

An Isothermal temperature coefficient measurement was performed with all rods out.

The value obtained was acceptable, however the moderator temperature coefficient portion was found to be slightly positive, and required action as specified in the Technical Specifications.

Results of the zero power flux map (#1500) are shown in Table

4.

A tilt in the power distribution of 3.9% was discovered in the S.E. quadrant and the resulting peaking factors FDH and Fxy exceeded the full power Technical Specification limits, but were below the zero power limits.

Consultation with the fuel vendor (Westinghouse) confirmed that the HZP tilt was expected.

Page 6

I I

l TABLE 2 ROD SWAP MODE ROD WORTH RESULTS ROD TEST MEASURED DESIGN BANK CONDITIONS INTEGRAL VALUE WORTH PSE&G D

Dil 926.4 956+/-96 c

Swap 613 593.2+/-89 pcm B

Swap 331 341+/-100 pcm A

Swap 784 838.8+/-126 pcm SD Swap 269 270+/-100 pcm SC Swap 317 295.6+/-100 pcm SB Swap 769 787+/-118 pcm SA Swap 735 753+/-113 pcm TOTAL BANKS Swap 4744 4835+/-484 pcm REVIEW CRITERIA

1.

Individual control and shutdown bank worth j6%I~ 15 % for banks.2:600 pcm except for reference Bank 16~ ~10%

jl~j.:::100 pcm for banks-<:..600 pcm

2.

Total of all Control and Shutdown Banks 1~%1:=::::10 %

where 16%1 =

161=

measured-design x 100%1 design lmeasured-designj Paqe 7

I TABLE 3 DILUTION MODE ROD WORTH RESULTS ROD TEST MEASURED BANK CONDITIONS INTEGRAL WORTH(pcm)

D ARO 926 c

Din 837 B

D, c in 434 A

D, c, B in 1008 s

D, c, B, A in 3377 TOTAL All Banks 6582 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

1.

Individual control and shutdown bank worth 1~%1-=:: 15% for banks~600 pcm I.6 I ::SlOO pcm for banks <GOO pcm

2.

Total of all Control and Shutdown Banks where I

measured-design x 100%1 design jmeasured-designj VENDOR DESIGN VALUE (pcm) 980 +/- 147 835 +/- 125 485 +/- 100 1105 +/- 166 3541 +/- 506 6946 +/- 695

.Page 8

6 8

! 0.

l 1.

i~

13 14 1::;

~=::.

FIGURE 3 t:IF~, :OF !='!:HN SALM INCORE MA~1s0a,2.s~ F'WR,BK D@~16~14~6PPM,QMWD/M":~~Pr.:~1

• SSC I

-4.0.

L K

J H

G F

E r'

C

=*

3. 3.

.716.

.964.

,993. 1.04:, 1.013.

.951, 3,4, 1.368 *

3. 4.

3. 6.

• 971.

3. 6.

4. 6.

1 t 41:::: *

4. 7.

5. 3.

6. 7.

l.C*03. l.411, 5 I 3 I 4 I 7 I

• 95~.

• 3.

1 /'.JO I 2.:.

!., 33S,

• <;86

• 1 I 1 I

-. 0.

j * :...:.~ l *

. ':-' ;.*e *

-2.3.

-::!.4.

-4.C'*.

• 9'17.

l

• l *

-

• l.

I/ I

,94.;, 1.:16 *

• s:s. 1.160 ** so9. 1.:1:, ** s91, 1.2cs ** 912. 1.:::sa ** 9ss.

1.:*9.~. l.01:-*.

-3.:.

-.:-."""t.

-:.o.

-s.o.

-8.0.

5.6.

5.5.

4.6.

3.e.

...:. *.1..

.;,3,

_.c.

t.:::: 7 I 1 * ::.s 0

. 7:1.

. 809.

• 9:4. i. :lo.

• 93:.

.7~*s.

1.Jo~. l.01s.

.~~1.

• • • -=

-~.~.

-3.5.

-4.0.

-5.8.

-3.4.

-2.9,

• c-:*..:'

• 870:,

~.193.

-5. 4,

-e *.::,

• ci.:.

,799,

-4.8.

. 81?. i.10: *

-

• 9.

3. 4.

4. 6.

• 664.

4. 6.

o7J.'.Jo

.l.t~C*~t

,9:4,.<.1VO'.Jo 18551 110771

,954, 1109,!;.

,965, 101331

-~.01

-J1Vo

-7,Q,

-6,C,

,7.:- ** E64.

• 7-=-~*

• ,~~.

-t O l* I t !: o

~ t

.., I C I ',...' t

-o.~.

-6.S.

-8,4.

-4,6,

.2:~ ** 829. 1.153 *. 2:9.

-10.4. -10.3,

-9.9.

-~*~*

. t0?.

1.1~5.

.869. :.192.

-10,9, -11.0. -11.0.

-S.4.

-3.o.

1.02~.

. ss:.

• 785,

~ -

-..; *.,j.

• 704 *

-5.7.

• 6.

. 9:3.

-

• 0.

1. C.41.

-4.9.

• 789.

-5.3.

1. 064.

1. 0.

• 7

.I.~.

-:

• 0.

-1. 4.

.853.

-:.s.

1. 074.

1. 6.

1. 06 7 *

-. 1.

• 7.!. 0.

~

1...11 1.136.

5. 8.

4. 7.

i.o9t.

.S87,

• 5.

5 I 9 I o :-r7:: t

~ -

.J. ~.

1

• ~

• .I.-!

• 5.:::.

.867.

5 t ('i I

• 8:U *

-

• 6 *

..... c: *

.9~7.

e. 3.

.SS6.

6' '7.

• 6(;4 *

"/. 7 t

• 0.'4 *

,),.).

.~3S.

7. C*,

1 t :.r..::7 I

. ~ ~:.:.

• 4.

1. 049.

• . 9.

l '04 4.

5,0.

I

'*~

• I 1 0 *

• ~. *J *

• 94'? *

...: t ~I

. 9'3:.

.~I 0 t

• '-? ~.. ::,.

• 5 IC'* o 1. :5 2 -~.

5 IE.

,559, 1.098 ** o..,-,. 1.169 ** 815. 1.125 ** 84'?. 1.156 ** 673. 1.::.;2.

1.00~. 1.341.

~.*:*'3'3.

-11.9.

-.1.~101

-;,5.

-7.3.

-7.3.

-~.~.

.5.

.4.

-.8.

6.5.

6.1.

.526 *. 848. 1.1:6.

-1:.e. -1:.s. -11.:.

.907. 1.:03,

-6.0.

-6.9.

.~45.

-5.6.

• 9'?3.

-:.9.

1.011. 1.307. 1 t C*21 I 3 I 5 I

• ~. :.

1. 024 t c

,53::,

0C?01 1,227,

,8//, 1,330,

,943, 1,3Q8, 19641 1,3::0. 1,0:.;2.

16431

-1:-;.a,

-,..~.

-7.3.

-6.3.

-1.3.

-,7, 3.o.

2.9.

.6 *.

,,3, s.::. *

• 657.

.884.

.941.

.~85.

.9?8.

.957.

-5.1. -5.o.

-.9.

-.5.

3.o.

.s.

• 717.

3.6.

SALM INCDRE MAP150o,2,5z PWR.BK DG:16.1486PPM10HWD/MTU.FT.:r1 CALCULATED POWER TILTS CNORMALIZED TO 1.0001 1.0198.1.037:

1.0:35

.9876

1. 0363

,9557 1.0353

.9387 1.0541

.9367

• 1.0392

• '7"880 POSITIVE -Y-VS, NEGATIVE -Y-TILT 1.01:0

.9880 POSITIVE -X-VS, NEGATIVE -X-TILT 1.0377

.9623 Page 9

'3.C-

5. c.

1. 0:...:.::

4 c

• ./:.:.3 5,E r<IFF

TABLE 4 Flux Map Results Summary

"--'--"1----1--+----- --*-* --- --- -- -- -- --- --+--l--+--1--.J---llf-~f---B--t---+--+--tt---t---t o,,,,_.,... in

Power Escalation Testing Power was increased to approximately 20% RTP on February 23 and then put on a 3% RTP per hour ramp rate.

Several problems occurred during the following day and a flux map at 26% RTP was taken shortly before the reactor failed to trip automatically due to a problem in the undervoltage attachment to both Reactor Trip breakers.

The complications and severity of this problem delayed restart of the reactor until mid May.

On May 20 the unit was restarted and reached the 47% RTP testing plateau two days later.

During May 22 and 23 three incore flux maps were conducted in order to obtain data for an excore calibration (maps #1502-1504).

Peaking factors for the maps obtained at the 47% RTP level were found to meet the full power limits and the quadrant power tilt had diminished to approximately 1.3% in the NE quadrant.

The target Delta I was determined to be

+11.4% and this value was set into the instrumentation.

The power coefficient measurement was conducted and a value of -11.4 pcm/%

obtained.

The value was compared to the FSAR limiting curves and found to be in the acceptable region.

Preliminary data evaluation at the 47% RTP level was conducted and power escalation at 3%/hr was started on May 24.

Page 11

Power was stabilized at 75% RTP and a heat balance was obtained for NIS calibration.

On May 25 a new target value for Delta I of

+2.6% was set.

Power was stabilized at.rV99% RTP and three flux maps (#1505-1507) for an excore calibration were obtained.

The peaking factors obtained with these maps were within the full power limits.

The quadrant power tilt was approximately 1.5% on these full power maps.

The power coefficient measurement was conducted and a value of -12.0 pcm/% was obtained.

This value was compared to the FSAR limiting curves and found to be in the acceptable region.

The state point data collection and subsequent RCS flow calculation were completed on May 28 with a measured flow of 386,214 gpm.

The measured value exceeds the minimum 100% RTP required flow in the Technical Specification of 349,200 gpm.

Page 12

FIGURE 4 MEASURED AND PERCENT. DIFF. OF FDHN SALM INCORE MAP1501 125.94Z PWR1BK D@17111374PPM17MWD/MTU1PT.62o1 2

3 4

5 6

7 s

9

10.

R P

N M

L K

J HG F

E D

C B

.67S.

.901.

.964. 1.051.

,985.

,942.

.711 *

• 9.

1.3.

4.8.

S.7.

7,2.

5,9, 5,7,

.632. 1.010. 1.306 ** as5. 1.372. 1.001. 1.393 ** 921. 1.321 ** 971.

1.s.

1.s.

.7.

1.9.

4,9, 7.0.

6.5.

6.1.

1.9.

-2.1.

.62S.

1

• 1 *

.615 ** 992. 1.2s1 ** 991. 1.2S3. 1.046. 1.090. 1.062. 1.340,

.967. 1.258. 1.002 ** 641 *

. 2.

.1.

-.4.

.3.

.6.

5.2.

6.7.

6.7.

5.1.

-2.1.

-2.3.

1.1.

4,5,

,977, 1.268 ** 913. 1.215 ** S44. 1.240 ** 907. 1.232 ** 926. 1.256 ** 930. 1.292. 1.026.

-,4,

-.a.

-4.1,

-s.s.

-5.s.

s.e.

s.2.

s.1.

3,7,

-2.3.

-2,3.

1.1.

4.6.

• 67S. 1.2S3.

.970. 1.244.

.75S.

.S52.

.960. 1.245.

.95S.

.890.

• 796. 1.256. 1.006. 1.318

• 2.2.

.1.

-.s.

-3.2.

-1.3.

-.a.

5.4.

s.3.

5.2.

3,7, 3,7,

-2.3.

2.s.

2.s.

A

.682.

2.9.

• 900.

.S60. 1.233,

.S60.

.840.

.S60. 1.146.

.97S. 1.126.

.S5S.

.832.

• 892. 1. 283.

• 870.

• 904.

2.5.

.3.

-2.s.

-3.4.

-1.7.

,7, 4,3, 4,3, 2.4.

.4.

-2.7.

.2.

1.s.

1.s.

2,9,

• 929. 1.283 ** 962. 1.140.

.910. 1.131.

2.s.

-.7. -2.6.

-2.s.

• 1.

2. 5.

,977, 1.101.

• 972. 1.113

• 2 I 6 I I 9 t

• 933. 1.195, 1.012. 1.315

• 2.5c 2.2.

2.5.

1.8.

,902 ** s72.

,9so ** s3s. i.13s,

.965. i.090, 1.001. 1.oss ** 972. 1.219.

• saa. 1.044.

2.9.

2.6.

• 924 *

1. 6.

-5.6.

-4.1.

-3.7.

-3.0.

-3.7.

1.6.

1.3.

.7.

1.1.

2.3.

3.2.

• 856. 1.235,

-5.7.

-4.4.

• 828.

-5.7.

• sos *

-5.7.

.94S. 1.149 *

-4.0.

-1.7.

1.195 *

• 877.

-1I5 t

.899. 1.0S8.

-1.1.

-1.4.

,931, 1.050.

-1.7.

-1.8.

• 994. 1.155,

4. 9.

4. 7.

• S42 *

-1. 5.

• 836. 1.059 *

-2.2.

-3.7.

. 903. 1.059 *

-3.7.

-3.7.

.859.

~

5. 0.

.S72 *

2. 0.

1. 216 *

4. 0.

1.026. 1.315.

3.9.

1.9.

• 911. 1.333.

.ss2.

2.3.

5.4.

2. 9.

.939.

3,5,

.982.

2.a.

.930.

.904.

3.0.

.625. 1.206 *. 91S. 1.266 ** 751.

.S37 ** S7S. 1.146 ** S89.

,834 ** 771. 1.296. 1.030. 1,339,

.694.

11.

-s.a.

-s.9.

-6.2.

-1.s.

-2.1.

-2.6.

-3.6.

-3.o.

-2,4.

-2,9,

.4.

.9.

s.3.

4,5, 4.6.

12 13 14 15

• 908. 1.167 ** 902. 1.240 ** S61. 1.143,

.S46. 1.149,

.S67. 1.243 ** 921. 1.343. 1.022.

-7.4.

-a.6.

-5.3.

-3.6.

-3.6.

-2.s.

-1,9,

-2.0.

-2,9,

-3.3.

-3.3.

5.1.

4,2.

• 567 ** 914. 1.199.

,944, 1.220.

,970, 1.002 ** 965. 1.227.

-7.:.

-7.7,

-6.8,

-4.S.

-4.3.

-2.5.

-2.0.

-3.o.

-3.8.

• 961. l.2SO *

-2.a.

-.s.

,574,

-7.5.

.937. 1.252.

-5.5.

-3.4.

• S41. 1.30S.

-3. 2.

• 0.

• 936. 1.2S7 ** S31. 1.263 *

. o.

-1.6.

-4,3,

-2.5.

• 661.

,975.

• 936.

.9S4.

• 907.

.84S.

• 656.

-1.6.

-1.6.

1.s.

1.7.

-1,4.

-4.6.

-2.4,

• 9S8

• SALM INCORE HAP1501125.94% PWR1BK D@171,1374PPM,7MWD/MTU,PT.6211

• 986 *

-

• 5.

• 61S *

-.5 *

.63S

• 4.0.

CALCULATED POWER TILTS <NORMALIZED TO 1.0001 1.0225.1.0353

• 1.0289 1.0056

• 1.0249

.9S86

• 1.0144

.9724 1.0214

.9562 1.0284

.9643 1.0053

.9773

• 9724 t

• 9822 POSITIVE -Y-VS, NEGATIVE -Y-TILT 1.0152

.9949 HEAS DIFF POSITIVE -X-VS. NEGATIVE -X-TILT Page 13 1.01s1

,9949

e e

FIGURE 5 HEASURED AND PERCENT, DIFF, OF FOHN SALH INCORE HAP1S02r47,17X PWR1BK D~l8S11294PPH,16HWD/HTU,PT,6,5 2

3 4

5 6

7 B

9

10.

11

• l2 l3 l4

. S R

P N

H L

K J

HG F

E D

C I:<

A

• 695.

7.1.

• 631.

5. 0.

,679.

3,9,

,964. 1.2sa *

3. s.

3. 7.

.896.

3. 9.

,937, s.6.

.902. 1.310.

"'4181

,994.

6. 7.

,974, 9,7,

• 970. 1.297, 5,3, 3,9.

• 860.

.652.

-.s.

.865. 1.226.

-

• 3.

1.1.

,954, 2.4,

.626.

4. 1.

• 630.

s.a.

• 987. 1.253 *

s. 8.

5. 0.

,994, 1.294, 1.040. 1.076. 1.030. 1.241

• 3.6.

3,7, 4.2.

~.3.

3.1.

-.s.

.968. 1.221.

,y.

2. 3.

.972.

4.1.

• 980. 1.256.

6.9.

5.a.

,994, 1.099 ** sos. 1.210.

-3,S. -12,4, -12,4, 1.8,

1. 265.

s. 1.

,999, 1.232.

• 714.

-12.4.

.a12.

-12,4.

.981 *

• 7'

4. 9.

-1. 8.

.909. 1.194,

• 9.

'4.

1.239,

'0 *

,974,

-.o.

,900. 1.242,

-2.1.

-1.0.

• 901'

-2.a.

,779,

-4,4,

,920. 1.220 *

-.7.

2,7, 1'226'

-2.2.

,973, 2.2.

• 631' 6.o.

'953' 3.1.

1. 235.

2.6.

,907,

.aa2. 1.248.

.sa2.

6.o.

2.s.

.6.

-3.7.

,854.

.861. 1.156. 1.002. 1.172.

,911 *

-7.~. -s.2.

-2.1.

-1.1.

-.7.

-2.s.

• 082 ** 906. 1.265 ** 881.

-4,4,

-1.1.

2.1.

2.6.

,931. 1.256 ** 982. 1.164.

5,9, 1.s.

-1.1.

-1.9.

,943, 1.141. 1.012. 1.134, 1.020. 1.166.

-J.2.

-3.6.

-2.s.

-2.4,

-,9,

-1.6.

,999, 1.212. 1.022. 1.26"/,

2.s.

2.1.

2.9, 2.3.

• 960.

3. 8,

• 905. 1.010

• 1.0.

-1.a.

,971, 1.197,

-3,5,

-3,3,

,993, 1.120. 1.054, 1.123.

-3.6.

-3,4,

-4.7.

-3,9,

,999, 1.2s1 *

-3.0.

1.i.

.911. 1.2s1.

3.6.

1.0.

,979, 1.131.

-! A,

-4,7,

,925. 1.126.

-s.o.

-4,9,

,997, 1.100,

-4,9,

-5,4,

,995, 1.14"/.

-"'4.11

-3.2.

.980.

'7.

.866.

1I2 I 16551

'9.

• 870,

1. 3.

1. 214.

• 0.

1.256 *

1. 4'

.959.

• 7,

• 923. 1.174.

-.2.

-1.1.

• 863.

-s.a.

1.181.

-s.0.

,869 *

-5.a.

• 773.

-s.1.

.899. 1.209,

-2.9.

-3.6.

,979,

-6.2.

• 876.

-s.s.

1.110.

-5,9,

• 925 *

-5.0.

• 886. 1.142,

-3.6.

-4,Q,

,959,

-5.9.

1.186.

-4.2.

,947,

-2.a.

,977, 1.1sa *

-2.a.

-2.6.

• 900.

-3. 9.

• 919 *

-. 9.

.916 *

-

• B *

• 817.

• 3.

,911, l 0243,

-

• 9'

-

• 9'

.915. 1.054.

1. 4.

2.s.

1.198. 1.01?.

. 9.

2. 4.

• 911.

-. 6.

1.258 *

,4, 1'246.

,5'

,957,

,4 *

.929. 1.208.

. 4.

1. 7.

.589.

• 923. 1.177.

,937, 1.217,

-2.4,

-2.s.

• 969. 1.013,

-3.o. -i.e.

,990,. 1.238 *

-.s.

-.s.

.983. 1.260

• 2.5, S,6.

,967' 3.6.

,594,

-1. 2.

• 931. 1.221.

-. o.

. 7.

,674.

• 866. 1.269 *

-.1.

1. 5.

• 867.

.906.

,939, 1.285

• 1.9.

2.0.

,954,

.915.

• 864. 1.245,

-,4, 2.6.

• 858 *

.672 *

.985.

s. 7.

,623 *

3. 7,

,919.

2. s.

1.275, 3.o.

,902.

s. 1.

• 949

• 2.6.

.606.

1.?.

.682.

5.0.

.900.

s.2

• ?121.

4 '7.

,972.

s. 1'

.925.

s.2.

.898.

4,9'

.674

• 3, 8, 2.-4

• 3.o.

-.6.

2.7.

, HEAS,

, DIFF CALCULATED POWER TILTS <NORHALIZED TO 1,000l 1.0051.1.0111 1.0081 1.0030

• 1.0111 1.0009

• 1.0112

,9903 1.0107

,9799 *

• 1.0101

,9000

• 1.oosa

,9909

,9803.1.0015,

POSITIVE -Y-VS, NEGATIVE -Y-TILT 1.0071

,9929 Page 14 POSITIVE -X-VS. NEGATIVE -X-TILT 1.ooes

,9915

FIGURE 6 MEASURED AND PERCENT, DIFF, OF FDHN SALM INCORE MAP1503,47,2% PWR,BK D~22811271PPH*25MWD/MTU*PT.5 R

P N

M

,L,

.K,

,J,

,H,

,G,

.F,

,E,

D C

B A

.697.

,934,

.Y5B. 1.oos.

,975,

.Y12.

.61l4.

1

~.o.

"4.6.

s.s.

6.2.

7,4, 2.1.

2.1

• 2 3

4 5

6 7

• 8 9

10.

11

• 12 13 14 15

• 613.

• * '2.

• 961.

4. 3.

I 612 I

3. 2 t

,959, 4 I 2 I 1.224,

4. 1.

• 966. 1.283.

• 962. 1.340 *

4. 0.

"4.o.

• 5.

5. o.-

1. 219.

3.2.

.998. 1.311.

,979,

-3. 7.

4.0.

. sos.

-11.0. -11.0.

1. 205 *

2. 7.

.91ll. 1.332.

5,4, 4,4,

,y40.

1.26~

• 2.1.

2.6.

1. 074

• 4.2.

1.040. 1.28"7.

• 91l4.

2. 6.

• 904.

1. 8.

3,7, 1.194 *

1. 8.

2. 1.

• 910.

• 3

• 1t253 I

1. 3.

• 956.

3 I~ I

1. 21"7.

3. 1.

.923

• 1 ' 1 *

.613

• 3, 3.

• 951.

3. 3

• 1.206.

.609

• 3.6.

• '144.

2.4.

• 699. 1.263.

3. l.

.981. 1.206.

,710.

.807.

3.o.

-2.s. -11.0. -11.0.

• 967. 1.222 *

1. 4.

• 9'

.960.

• 8.

• 900.

-

• 7.

• 71l'I. 1. 23"1 *

-1. 1.

• 0.

,943, 6.4.

• 919. 1.242.

.9.

-.a.

,957, 1.202.

• 980.

-1I6 I

l. 4.

• 867 *

-4.2.

1.151.

-1.6.

• 839.

-7. 1.

.as7. 1.1s2 *

-6.3.

-.4.

• 932. 1.143, 1.019.

-, lj,

-1.5.

.998. 1.160.

• 90'1.

-.7.

-

• 3.

.3.

1.156

• 1.034, 1.165.

-. 7.

• 6.

• 4.

.892.

-1. 1.

,955,

,3,

,974, 3,7,

. 919. 1.008.

1.3.

-1.9.

• 868. 1.187 *

-2.4,

-2.0.

,997, 1.152. 1.143, 1.161. 1.004. 1.209,

-1.s. -1.s. -1.0.

-.s.

-.a.

-.2.

.930. 1.279.

,994, 1.134.

3,4, 1.2.

-1.3.

-3.l.

• 882.

• 908. 1. 257.

• 863.

-,4,

-,4,

,4,

-4.6.

• 656. 1.209,

.940. 1.100.

-1.3.

-1.3.

-1.3.

-4.6.

• 901. 1.139.

-3.l.

• 001 *

-3.5.

• 922. 1.121.

-3.1.

-3,4,

• 861.

.869.

• -4.6. -s.o.

.761.

.862.

-4.7.

-5.o.

1.187.

-4.1.

.870 *

-4.1.

.990. 1.12_9 *

-3.6.

-3.o.

1.111 ** 96Y.

-3,9,

-3.1.

.914. 1.173.

-4.0.

-3.2.

1. 136.

-3.2.

.870.

-2.0.

1. 019.

-

• 9.

1. 13"7.

-1,7.

,934,

-2.0.

l, 149, 1.151.

-.9.

.902 *

-1. 5.

• 883.

-2.6.

• llll4.

• 950.

-.2.

• 893.

-1.0.

• 790.

-1.0.

1.20~ *

-2.6.

.'104. 1.270.

.926 *

l. 6.

-

• l.

1. 4.

1.161l.

-. 2

• 1.00ll.

1. 1.

l. 21l3 *

1. 5.

• 81l6. 1.034 *

• 919 *

1. 4.

-

• 4.

• 6.

1.165 *

-

• 5.

.895 *

-1. 0.

1. 224 *

-1.0.

• 93:;j.

2.5.

1.006. 1.21ll.

1. 0.

1. 9.

-.5.

2.6 *

.'169. 1.246,

1. 8.

1. 8.

1.19"7.

1. ll.

.938.

1. 8 *

• 569.

-3.1.

,992. 1.144.

-3.l.

-3.i.

.922. 1.224.

,975, 1.014.

-2.7.

-1.6.

,975, 1.226.

-2.s. -2.a.

,957, 1.210.

.'140.

2.1.

.598.

1. ll.

,575,

-3.1.

-3,9,

.911. 1.210.

-1.9,

-1.2 *

-2.9.

• 911. 1.297,

-1.1.

1.6.

,949, 1.205 *

1. 9.

• 7,

--.2.

2.5,

.894. 1.230.

-2.9.

-.2.

.9~1.

2.s.

.606.

2.1.

• 61l) 3,4

116 3.4

.930 3,4

.966 3.0

.Y26 2.'1

.682 2.6

• 674.

• 893.

-.o.

,925

• 1.9 *

.967.

2.2.

,916.

• 9.

.86"7.

-2,9,

.668.

, MEAS

• 6.

-.2 *

, DIFF,

SALM INCORE MAP1503147o2% PWR,BK D@22811271PPM,25MWD/MTU*PT.5 CALCULATED POWER TILTS <NORMALIZED TO 1.000l 1.0109.1.0239

• 1.0174 1.0051

• 1.0168

.9993

• 100098

.Yll94 lo 00"73

,9794 *

• 1.00-48

,9793 *

.991l7

.9860

• 9793.

• 9927

• POSITIVE -Y-VS, NEGATIVE -Y-TILT 1.0110

.9890 Page 15

FIGURE 7 MEASURED AND PERCENT. DIFF. OF FDHN SALH INCORE HAP1504,48,1X PWk,BK DW228*1180PPH131HWD/HTU,PT.5 2

3 4

5

• 6

• 7 8

• 9

10.

11.

12 13 14 15 R

P N

H

.L *

.K *

.J *

,H, *,G,

.F,

.E

• 0 C

B A

.698.

.928.

,956. 1.002.

.98.o4.

.891.

.668.

~.2.

3,9, S,3, 6.0.

8."4.

-,2,

-,2,

.702.

5, 7,

.967. 1.205.

4. 2.

4.2.

• 617.

5.0.

• 966. 1.231. 1.000.

4. 2.

4. 9.

• 967. 1.233,

• 883. 1.098.

,957, 1.335, 3,9, 4.6.

1.314. 1.0.o46 *

"4.2.

-4,4.

• 005. 1.203.

s. 0.

4. 9.

-3.3. -11.3. -11.3.

2.5,

• 976. 1.321.

4,9, 3,5.

1

• 075. 1

• 035.

.901.

1. 5.

1.18~ *

1. 0.

1.273, 3.9.

• 989.

3. 9, 1.213 *

-1.9.

.708.

.804.

• 977. 1

• 229.

.965.

1. 3.

-11.3, -11.3.

2.s.

,919., 1.23Y.

-.2.

.s.

.96.o4..

~.

.898. 1.232 *

-1.0.

-,4,

,939,

1. 2.

• 913.

• o.

.893.

-1.5.

.781. 1.22Y.

-2.2.

-.6.

.612

• 3.1.

• 949

• 3.1.

1.204,

2. 4.

,977,

2. 6.

.617

• s.o.

• 949 *

3. 1

• 1.2~8.

2. 8 *

• 933.

• 928. 1. 248.

• 869.

5,3, 1.a.

-.2.

-3.9.

• 030.

,953, 1.i55,

,999, 1.164 ** 902.

-7.2.

-6.8.

-.1.

-.2.

.6.

-1.~.

.883.

.902. 1.276.

.931 *

-2.2.

-.3.

2.0.

2.2.

,947, 1.279.

.981. 1.147, 5,3, 1.2.

-1.5.

-2.0.

• 924.

1.13~. 1.021. 1.159. 1.033, 1.148.

-2.9.

-2.2.

-.6.

-.5.

.s.

-1.1.

.951. 1.166. 1.010. 1.285 *

-.2.

..,4, 1.4.

1.7.

• 963.

2.6.

.910. 1.002 *

. 3.

-2. 4.

• 861. 1.176.

-3.2.

-2.9.

,920. 1.267.

2.3.

,3,

.975. 1.120.

-2.1.

-3.6.

• 918.

-3.6.

• 878.

-.9'

.904. 1.243.

-

• 9.

-

• 7.

.863.

-4. 7.

• 861.

-4.6.

.657. 1.211.

-1.1.

-1.1.

.942. 1.178.

-1.1.

-4.7.

,759,

-4.9.

.902. 1.141.

-2.0.

-3.0.

.881. 1.185.

-3.5.

-4,3,

,990, 1.150. 1.130.

-2.2.

-1.7.

-2.0.

1.148.

-1.9.

.996. 1.206 *

-1.6.

• 885. 1. 033.

I 5 I I 5 I

,921.

1. 5.

1. 119.

-3.6.

• 991. 1.12°7.

-3.6.

-3.3.

1.007, 1.142 *

,949, 1.161. 1.004. 1.2aa.

• 869. 1.111.

-5.1.

-3.9.

-2.0.

.967. 1.132.

-3,4,

-2.1.

.860.

-5.2.

.912. 1.178.

-4,3,

-2,7,

.940.

-1. 3.

• 868. 1.132.

-4,4,

-3.5.

.876. 1.158.

-1.3.

-1.3.

-1. 6 *

• 899.

-1.0.

.896.

-1.2.

-.s.

-.a.

,7, 1,9,

.894.

-1.0.

.896. 1.224,

• 948 *

4. 0.

-1.0.

.790. 1.224,

-1.0.

-1.0.

.976.

1.2~6.

2.6.

2.6.

.897. 1.223 *

-1.2.

-1.2.

.950. 1.206.

4.1 *

,945, 2.6.

• 570.

-3.0.

• 893. 1.1s1.

.925. 1.226 *

,973, 1.022.

.987. 1.241,

.970. 1.22Y,

• 951.

3.3.

.603

• 2.6.

-3.0.

,575,

-3.0.

-2.5.

-3.6.

,910. 1.232.

-1.1.

-.1.

-2.7,

-2.9.

.918. 1.299.

-. 2.

1. 8.

-.a.

-1.5.

.950. 1.293, 2.0.

1.3.

-1.s.

• 903.

-1. 9.

1. 1.

1.24°7.

1. 1.

4,1.

,966.

4.1.

.613

• 3,4,

• 6Y5 4.6

.92i 4.e

• Y37 4.::;

.97~

3. <;

,93~

3"

.921

4. c

.691 4.C

.682.

1. 9.

.899.

• 7,

.926.

2.0 *

• 968.

2.3.

• 921 *

1. 5.

.677.

1. 1.

, liEAS

, DIFF SALH INCORE HAP1504148.1X PWR,BK D@22811180PPH131HWD/HTU,PT.5 CALCULATED POWER TILTS CNORHALIZED TO 1.000>

1.0117.1.0141 1.0129 1.0055

• 1.0119

,9993 *

• 1.0097

• 9876

1. 0081

,9759 *

• 1.0065

• 9787

• 1. 0039

.9914

,991... 1.0013

• POSITIVE -Y-VS. NEGATIVE -Y-TILT 1.0087

.9913 Page 16

FIGURE 8 MEASURED AND PERCENT, DIFF, OF FDHN SALM INCORE MAP1505,98.54~ PWR,BK D~228*1025PPH*llOMWD/MTU,PT,5 3

4

~

.J 6

7 8

9

10.

t l

• 12 t3 t4 L5 R

P N

M

.L *

,K *

,J,

.H,

,G,

.F,

.E,

D C

B

.680.

.90'!:;,

,933,

,979,

,963.

.892.

,669.

l. 5.

1.3.

2.7.

3.6.

6.0.

-.2.

-.2 *

• 588.

-

• 9.

. 942. 1.252 *

,933, 1.312.

• 962. 1.313.

3. 4.

2. 9.

.919. 1.221 *

-.2.

-1.0.

• 911.

-1. 9.

,595,

.:5.

1. 5.

1. 5'

1. 3 t

2. 8.

,590,

.923. 1.170.

. 3.

t 2.

-

• 9.

. 925. 1.178.

,974,

. 4.

.2.

-4.2.

. 675. 1.226.

,953, 1.199.

1 t 5 I I 2 I I 1 t

-3 I 1 t t 912.

3. 0.

,926.

3. 0.

• 942.

• 4.

• 900.

• l *

• 910.

I 2 I

l. 270.

• 5.

.903.

-

• 4.

1. 257 t

-.5 *

l. 240.

-. 9.

,986.

-1. 1.

1. 008.

-1. 9.

.976.

-2.0.

.876.

-3. 2.

1. 165.

I 5 I

.885.

~

t..J.

1. 175.

,4,

• 867 ** 892. 1.217 ** 914.

-2.1.

-2.2.

-2.s.

1.0.

• 655. 1.206.

.938. 1.249,

-1.5.

-1,5,

-1.5.

1.0.

• 891. 1.116.

-3.3.

-5.1.

.893.

-2.2.

. 558.

-s.1.

• 874. 1.135.

-5.1.

-3.9.

,973, 1.279, 1.037, 1.072. 1.033. 1.258.

,949, 1.159.

,923,

.602.

2. 4.

1.s.

1.5.

3,5, 4,1.

3,0.

-.2.

-1.0.

-1.9.

.:5

• 1.141,

,937, 1.211 ** 916. 1.200.

,926.

1.24~ ** 918. 1.179 *

,934,

1. J *

-7,9,

-7,9, 3.2.

3.1.

2.3.

2.0.

.6.

.6.

.2.

.736.

-7.8.

.858.

-4.9.

• 951.

-

• 1.

1. 212.

• 1 *

.836.

-7.8.

.991.

1.2~6.

4. l.

3. 6.

• 987.

3.6.

,999, 1.193.

-2.a.

3,1.

1.031. 1.197.

1.177.

1. 4.

1.026.

1. 4 *

1. 031.

2.3.

3. 1.

1.178.

1I4 I 1.071.

4 I 2 I 1.203.

2 I 8 I

,936.

3 I 2 f

• 94~.

3.2.

1. 210.

4. 3.

1. 040 *

2. 8.

• 963. 1.160. 1.016. 1.161. 1.055, 1.191.

1. 2.

• 911.

1. 0.

• 799.

• 1

• 1.222.

-1I2 t

-.o.

-1.2.

-.3.

2.7.

2.7.

,912. 1.137,

,993, 1.165.

-.4.

-1,7.

-.6.

,7,

. 900.

• 937. 1. 193.

• 943.

-.8.

-1.7.

-1.6.

-1.1.

.896.

-1. 3.

1. 160.

-1.1.

.878. 1.160.

.932.

1. 9.

.888.

-2.1 *

.889.

-2. 1.

.935. 1.221.

-2.5.

-3.1.

.968.

-3.4.

,996.

-3.3.

• 972. 1.221 *

-3.1.

-3.1.

.828

• 3, 7.

.936.

3. 7.

,992.

4. 2.

.981.

3. 0.

1. 260.

1. 9.

• 91 '5.

1. 1.

1.183.

1. 0.

.902.

1. ~.

1. 193.

1. 9.

,9::,9, 1.234.

• J.

• 8.

1. 256.

• 3.

1.000.

1. 2.

1.040.

1. 2.

1. 014.

1. 8.

• 916.

• 4.

1f272 I

• 6.

.908.

• 1 *

1. 267 *

• 3.

.920.

.922. 1.272.

.905.

2.0.

1.9.

1.7.

-.8.

.a12. 1.25*1.

.968. 1.230

• 1.7.

1.7.

1.?.

.5.

1. 212.

-2. 1.

.928.

1.},

.932. 1.164.

-2. 8.

-1. 4.

1'182 *

.926.

,,;,J,

• 917

• t ~91.

. 563.

-5. 1.

• 902. 1.213.

-2.a.

-1.6.

• 896. 1.248 ** 913. 1.254 *

-2.7.

-2.2.

-1.9.

-1.7.

• sa2. 1.199 *

-4.2.

-2.a.

. 915 *

-1. 4.

. :390 *

-. 5.

• 667.

-

• 4.

• 871.

-2.5.

.891.

-1. 9.

.931.

-1. 6.

,893 *

-1.6.

.8~6.

-4.2.

.651.

-2.a.

SALM INCORE MAP15Q5,99,54~ PWR,BK D@228,1025PPM,110HWD/HTU1PT.5 CALCULATED POWER TILTS <NORMALIZED TO 1.000l 1.0074.1.0183

• 1.0120 1.0007 1.0164

.9940 1.0146

.9907

,9973 1.0105

.9846 *

.9982

.9840

• 9820.

• 9860 1.0125 POSITIVE -Y-VS. NEGATIVE -Y-TILT 1.0086

.9914 Page 17 A

.674

• 1 I :i I

.899.

1 * :,j.

I 915 t

1. l *

,944, I 6 t

• 904 *

.879 *

-

• 8.

.660 *

-.a.

ME.AS llIFF

FIGURE 9 MEASURED AND PERCENT, DIFF, OF FDHN SALM INCORE MAP1506199.59~ PWR1BK De2151102::iPPH1117HWD/MlU 1Pl.6i5 2

3 4

6 7

8 9

10.

11.

12 13 14 15 R

P N

H L

K J

HG F

E D

C B

A

,594,

• 6.

. 929.

. a.

• 675. 1.227.

2. 3.

. 7.

• 680.

2.3.

. 591.

-. 8.

,949, 1.254

• 2.1.

2. 2.

• 929. 1.175.

. 5.

-. 8.

1.185 *

~

. 875.

-4. 6 t

,957, 1.202.

• 5.

-3. 2.

• 980 *

2. 1.

1.136 *

-8.5.

,735,

-8.6 *

• 901

• 1 '9.

.927

• 2.9.

.924. 1.303.

2.0.

2.a.

1.284 *

,934,

-a.:;.

1t03:J I 3,4,

1. 214.

3.o.

,973,

3. 3.

.950.

5,3,

,955, 1.297, 3 101 2 I 3 t

1. 069.

3,7, 1.027.

2.6.

.918. 1.201.

2. 9.

1 I 9 f

.835.

-8.6.

.998. 1.262.

4.0.

3,4,

,992, 3,4,

• 906.

3. 3.

.901. 1.242.

.879.

. 5.

-.5 *. -3.2,

• 862 ** 891. 1.199, 1.035, 1.200 *

-5.2.

-3.3.

3.o.

2,9, 3,2.

.879.

I 6 I

.661.

-

• 6.

.902. 1.214.

• 913.

-1. 7.

• 596.

-1.1.

1. 248.

-.7.

I 92:J I

1. 5.

,937, 2 I 6 I

.946.

,947, 1.164.

-1.2.

-1.7.

.926.

,921. 1.1s2.

I 4 I t 2 t

.827. 1.261.

• 961.

,935, 2.9.

1. 6.

• 9.

.917. 1.233.

• 9.

.

• 6.

.602.

2. 1 *

• ~*34 *

1. 231.

1. 1.

.90~.

,9,

. 922. 1.265.

.987. 1.168.

3 t 3.

. 8.

-

• 8.

-. 6.

,954, 1.100. 1.053, 1.190

• 1.1.

2.1.

2.2.

1.072, 1.21::::;.

4,1.

4.1.

,995, 1.1s4. 1.oos. 1.268.

3.s.

.a.

1.3.

1.0.

• 941.

I 7 t

,902. 1.010.

-.2. -1.s.

• 886.

-

• 8.

1.215, 1.028. 1.184. 1.164. 1.204. 1.045. 1.258.

-,4, 1.0.

1,3, 1.~.

3.o.

.::..o.

3.2.

.903. 1.041.

1.1.

1.2.

.908 *

,997, 1.2s2.

. 4.

- '3.

.976. 1.175.

• 964. 1.163. 1.017. 1.161. 1.059, 1.197.

.983. 1.194. 1.014. 1.264.

-1.9.

-.1 *

• 865.

-1. 4.

• 884. 1.217 *

• 915.

• 7.

-2.5.

. 656. 1.210.

,945, 1.251.

-

• 6.

-

• 7.

I 8 I I 7 I

. 6.

-.4.

-1,3.

2.s.

• 915.

• 7 *

• 916. 1.140 *

-.7.

-2.0.

,999, 1.171 *

• 801.

• 902.

-.4.

-1.2.

,939, 1.196 *

-2.2.

-1.9.

.946 *

-1. 4.

• 896. 1.122.

• 897. 1.224 *

.897. 1.159 *

• 880. 1.161.

-2.s.

-4,9,

-2.2.

-1. 4.

-1. s.

-1. 6.

-1. 4.

-1. 5.

.::..1.

1.6.

1.9.

t/t

,939, I 7'25 t

.925. 1.272.

• 87'5.

1. 8.

1. 8.

1. 9.

-

• 1.

. 891.

.817. 1.264 *

• 970. 1.22*7,

-2.4.

1 I 8 I 1*8,

, I*

• 890. 1.213 *

,933, 1.183.

.927.

-2.3.

-2.3.

1. 8.

• ..I*

• 6.

• 561.

-4,9,

,979, 1.141 *

-4.9.

-3.7.

,935, 1.21s.

-2.5.

-3.1.

• 965.

-3. 6.

.996.

-3.4.

• 970. 1.218 *

-3.1.

-3.1.

• 934. 1.169 *

-2.6.

-1.3.

.921 *

-,4,

. 566 ** 905, 1.211.

-4.9.

-2.6.

-1.3.

• 663.

-. 3.

• 886. 1.241.

-2.1.

I 86:J t

. so:,.

-2.2.

-1. 8.

.910. 1.247 *

-1.9.

-1.6.

. 926 *

. ass *

-1. 6.

-1. 5 I

. 872. 1.197 *

. 917 *

-3. 7.

-2.:::;.

-1. 2.

. aso.

.649.

-3.8.

-2. 4.

SALM INCORE MAP1506,99.59~ PWR1BK D@21511025PPH1117HWD/HTU1PT.615 CALCULATED POWER TILTS <NORMALIZED TO 1.0001 1.0074.1.0151 l.0113 1.0013 1.0149

.9951 1.0146

• '7118

.9884

• 1.0117

.9849

.9989

.9814 ** 9861 POSITIVE -Y-VS. NEGATIVE -Y-TILT 1.0081

.9919

,593,

-

• 4.

1.0132

.672.

1. 8 *

.893 *

1. 9.

. 915.

2.4.

• 94*7.

1. 4.

• 904 *

1. 2 *

. a*1s.

. 638 *

-

• 3.

MEHS DlFF Page 18 POSITIVE -X-VS. NEGATIVE -X-TILT 1.0069

.9931

FIGURE 10 MEASURED AND PERCENT. DIFF, OF FDHN SALH INCORE HAP1507199.34X PWR1BK D@22811013PPM1140MWD/MTU1PT.5 R

P N

H

.L,

.K,

,J,

.H,

,G,

,F,

,E,

D C

B A

2 3

4 5

6 7

8 9

10.

11

• 12 13 14 15

• 591.

-. 4.

. 678.

• 90:3.

• 920.

• 960.

. 921.

• 891.

.668.

1.3.

1.4.

1.4.

1.5.

1.::;.

-.2.

-.2.

.940. 1.249.

1. 3.

1. 3.

,933, 1.299.

1. 4.

1. 8.

.950. 1.291.

,919, 1.221.

2.1.

1. 2.

-.2.

-1.0.

.912.

-1. 7.

.589 *

-. 6.

• 594,,

1. 0.

.929. 1.177.

• 9.

-

• 4.

,971, 1.276. 1.030. 1.066. 1.024. 1.257, 1.3.

1.3.

2.7.

3,4, 2.2.

-.2.

.930. 1.161 *

-1.0.

-1.7.

• 915.

-.6.

• 931. 1.186.

1. 0.

. 8.

.876. 1.140 *

-4.0.

-7.9.

• 836. 1.214,

-7.9.

3,5,

,920.

3.6.

1.204.

2.6.

.929. 1.246

• 2 I 4 I I 7 t

,919, 1.171.

,7,

-.4.

.590,

.924.

.3.

• 680. 1. 229.

,955, 1.198.

• 3.

-3.1.

,735,

-7.9.

• 833.

-7. 9.

.996. 1.263 *

,993,

. 941.

3. 8.

.830. 1.262 *

,959, 1.234,

.910.

2. 7,

.904. 1.236.

,974,

-.9.

-1.2.

-3.4.

,9::;9,

-4. 9.

4. :::;,

4.2

• 4 t2 I

• 892. 1.200. 1.038. 1.205.

-2.6.

3.8.

3.8.

4,2.

,950

• 3.8.

3 I 9 I 2 t 0 t

• 7,

• 8.

.938.

3. 9.

.916. 1.2::;7,

1. 3.

...J.

• 917.

~

• 924. 1.267.

• 984. 1.164.

-1.2.

-.6.

.952.

. o.

1.183.

1. 9.

1, O::J7,

2. 9.

1.19<;*, 1.076

• 2.9.

4,7, 1.215.

4. 7.

• 991.

4;1

• 1.1 BO,

• 8.

1.008. 1.273.

• 941.

.2.

. 399.

-

• 1.

• 860.

-2.9.

,903, 1.oos.

-.4.

-1.9.

. 885.

-2.9.

• 9 76 *

-2.0.

1.215.

-2.9.

.886. 1.214

• I 4 I 12 I 1.177 *

• 6.

.917 *

1. 3.

,966.

1. 4.

• 915.

1. 3.

1.031. 1.192. 1.167.

1.9.

1.9.

2.2.

1. 213.

3,7, 1I16::J I

• 4

• 1.170. 1.064.

• 916.

• 0.

t

/

t

1. 142 *

-1. 2.

1. 002.

• 1 *

1. 174 *

1. 6.

1.047,

.}1,Jt

• 940 *

2. 7.

1. 1.

. 7.

1.256.

3. 7.

.902. 1.039.

1.4.

1.1.

.986. 1.193. 1.012.

3.6.

1.9.

1.6.

• 928.

• 930 *

2. s.

2. 8.

.908.

'2.

1. 266..

.904,

-.9.

• 646. 1.189.

.966. 1.253.

• 801 *

• 3.

• <;'03 *

-

• 4.

.940. 1.195 *

-1.3.

-1.4.

,943,

.88'.:i.

-1. 0.

.821. 1.271.

,9::;i;*. 1.233.

-2.9.

-2.9.

1t5 I 1 t 3 I

• 878. 1.121.

-4.7.

-4,7,

• 896. 1.226 *

-1.a.

-.9.

• 899, 1.164 *

-1.0.

-.s.. "

. 560.

-4.7.

.877. 1.140.

-4.7.

-3.5.

• 939. 1. 225 *

-2.1.

-2.s.

• 9i'l *

-3. 1.

t 565 I

-4.7.

I 899 I 1 I 205 I

-3.1.

-2.3.

. 654.

-2.4.

• 893. 1.222.

-3.0.

-4.2.

• 864.

-3.3.

• 869.

-4.2.

2. 8.

2. 8.

. 7.

. 7.

• 879. 1.160 *

-i.o.

-1.2.

.886. 1.207 *

-2' ::J.

• 903. 1,HJ4,

-1. 1.

'/ '

• 996 *

-3.3.

.978. 1.230,

.948. 1.168 *

-1.1.

-1.1.

. 91 s-*'

-2.5.

-..::..J.

. 891. 1.222.

.906.

• 869 *

-4.2.

-4.2.

. 911. 1.:no.

-1.1.

-1.1.

.883 *

-1. 1.

.663 *

-1. 1.

• 918 *

-1. 1.

• ::J92 *

-.2.

.928

• I :J92 I

• 7.

SALM INCORE HAP1507199.34Z PWR,BK DG22811013PPM1140HWD/MTU1PT.5 CALCULATED POWER TILTS <NORMALIZED TO 1.000) 1.0065.1.0161 1.011:3 1.0008

• 1.01::.3

.9951 1.0145

• 9<;'16 1.0128

.9880

• 1.0112

.9841

,9999

.9843

• 9801.

• 9885 POSITIVE -Y-VS. NEGATIVE -Y-TILT 1*.ooso

,9920 Page 19

.675

1. ~.

.899

.916 1.8

.944

'6.

.904

.878.

-,9,

.659

-

• 9' MEAS DIFF

APPENDIX A STARTUP TEST PROGRAM DESCRIPTION SALEM UNIT 1 CYCLE 5 The startup program is written such that deviations between measurement and design beyond established tolerances could call for a review of test data, a repeat of the measurement or a review of the safety analysis.

Operation is always within FSAR and Technical Specification limits.

A-1

STARTUP TEST PROGRAM DESCRIPTION SALEM UNIT 1 CYCLE 5 Test:

Initial Criticality Initial Conditions:

Mode 3, Tave = 547°F, CB = 2000 ppm Shutdown Banks Withdrawn Control Banks Inserted Test

Description:

Pull control banks to D at 160 steps.

Dilute to criticality.

Checkout reactivity computer.

Acceptance Criteria:

Design:

Reactivity computer readings are within 4% of doubling time measurements.

FSAR/T.S.:

Reactor must achieve criticality with the control banks above the zero power insertion limits.

A-2

STARTUP TEST PROGRAM DESCRIPTION SALEM UNIT 1 CYCLE 5 Test:

Flux Mapping Initial Conditions:

HZP, ARO Test

Description:

Operate Flux Mapping System in accordance with Part 13 of the Reactor Engineering Manual "Incore Flux Mapping System Operation" Acceptance Criteria:

Design:

Assembly Power Design +/- 10% for assembly Power less than 0.9 Design +/- 15% for assembly Power greater than 0.9 FSAR/T.S.:

Not applicable below 5% power.

A-3

STARTUP TEST PROGRAM DESCRIPTION SALEM UNIT 1 CYCLE 5 Rod Worth Measurements Initial Conditions:

HZP The rod exchange method is used to measure all control bank worths.

Based on the results of these measurements, additional measurements using the boron dilution method may be necessary.

Test

Description:

Determine the worth of the reference rod bank by using the boron dilution method.

Exchange this reference bank with another bank while keeping the reactor critical and constant RCS boron concentration.

Using the heights of the rod banks with respect to the reference bank, infer the equivalent boron dilution rod worths using analytical techniques and compare results to acceptance criteria.

Acceptance Criteria:

Design:

Design value +/- 10% on total banks worth Design value +/- 15% on any individual bank greater than or equal to 600 pcm Design value +/- 100 pcm on any individual bank less than 600 pcm FSAR/T.S.:

Worth of all rods less most reactive stuck rod must be 1.6% Delta K/K.

A-4

STARTUP TEST PROGRAM DESCRIPTION SALEM UNIT 1 CYCLE 5 Test:

Boron Endpoint Initial Conditions:

HZP Endpoint is run for the ARO configuration.

Test

Description:

Adjust RCS boron to near the just critical endpoint configuration.

Move rods to endpoint while measuring additional worth on the reactivity computer.

Acceptance Criteria:

Design:

Design * +/- 50 ppm FSAR/T.S.:

Design +/- 100 ppm

• Design values on attached Table.

A-5

STARTUP TEST PROGRAM DESCRIPTION SALEM UNIT 1 CYCLE 5 Test:

Isothermal Temperature Coefficient Initial Conditions:

HZP The coefficient is measured at the ARO rod configuration.

Test

Description:

Starting with Tave = 547°F, cooldown the primary system approx. 5°F.

Heat the primary system back up to 547°F.

The X-Y Recorder will plot reactivity vs. Tave.

Acceptance Criteria:

Design:

FSAR/T.S.:

ARO:

-2.2 +/- 3 pcm/°F

-2.9 x 10-4 (Delta K/K) /°F less than or equal to MTC* less than or equal to 0

• MTC = ITC -

doppler A-6

STARTUP TEST PROGRAM DESCRIPTION SALEM UNIT 1 CYCLE 5 Test:

Power Coefficient Initial Conditions:

Reactor power is not changing.

The Xenon concentration is within 3% of its equilibrium value.

This test is run twice during the startup program.

First at 47% power, than at 100%.

Test

Description:

Take a heat balance.

Change turbine power between 2%

and 4% with the control rods in manual.

The Tave and Delta T recorders will monitor changes in these parameters as a function of time.

Acceptance Criteria:

Design:

Design value* +/- 30%

FSAR/T. S.:

Must fall between upper and lower curve assumed in FSAR accident analysis.

• See attached curve (Figure A-1)

A-7

~

w

i;.i I

00 PARAMETER MEASURED Isothermal Temperature Coefficient Critical Boron Concentratior.

Power Coefficient Readtivity Computer C:heck Reviewed Salem I, TEST CONDITIONS Critical HZP ARO Cr1t1cal,HZP C/B D Inserted Critical HZP, ARO Critical,HZP C/B D inserted Critical, HZP C/B C inserted Critical, HZP C/B B inserted Critical, HZP C/B A inserted 47% RTP 95% RTP Critical HZP,controlling on C/B D SALEM I, CYCLE IV ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA SHEET 1 PHYSICS RESULTS MEASURED REQUIRED VALUE VALUE

£ OxlO 4 AND

- /. s-z

> -2. 9xl0 4 k/k/°F

-2.2+/-3

.C::: OxlO 4 AND Nfa

>-2. 9xl0 4 k/k/°F

-3.5+/-3 I¥ 'l'1 14 83, +/- 5 Oppm (Cal. from ARO I-, fr I./

Boron)

/3/t./

(+

)ppm N.A.

IU I t11

///ffe N.A.

!U/17 N.A.

Figure 1 J /,'I

+/- 30%

Limits of Fiqure 2 Figure 1

+/- 30%

- )'), 0 Limits of Fiqure 2 (Double Time Reactivity +/- 4%

23.0 zi.. 2 +/-

.~?

3 9. 'I 3 g. 9 +/- l. S-6 66.o 6'0- 2.

+/- 2-'73 3

Rx. ENG MAN PART 200 I

REQUIREMENT REFERENCE COMMENTS T.S.3.1.1.4 Ref. 2.3 T.S. 3.1.1.4 Ref. 2.3 Ref. 2.3

-+ /t/'1'"7 11-r."

PART 15 Ref. 2.2

+10//rn !/.~:

N.A.

N.A.

N.A.

Ref. 2.3 Ref. 2.4 Ref. 2.3 Ref. 2.4

.Ref. 2.3 Refueling Test Sequence

(...

2

~

~ -

0

.()

.4) d

-4 j

l j

pl I

0 ARAMETER EASURED uclear nthalpy ot Channel actor z

~at Flux ot Channel actor Reviewed Salem I, Cycle 5 TEST ONDITIONS Cr1t1ca,HZP ARO Map J5oo

""-4 7%

Map J~ol I

/V95%

Map l~o5 Cr1t1ca,HZP, ARO Map /~(JO

"" 7%

Map / 5o:i

~5%

15'0 ~

Map SALEM I, CYCLE IV ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA SHEET 3 FDUX MAP RESULTS MEASURED VATJUE

-/J, ~

MAX

-/~.'ii (MAX)

(Attached Code Map)

I. ~<?OS

/~l/~O~

), ~o~~

?..

• OI fp /

/.g/r; 6

Rx. ENG MAN PART 200 REQUIRED VALUE

+/- 0%

or pwr~. 9

+/-15% for F/A pwr <. 9 (for measures Thimbles)

REQUIREMENT REFERENCE Ref. 2.3

~ 1.55[1.0+0.2(1-P)]

T.S. 3.2.3

/. '?I if f 'f /. '"'r?o'>

1.55 1.0+0.2 -I T.S. 3.2.3 I. >~i e1~s1~0)

T.S. 3.2.2

~.2.32 K z T.S. 3.2.2 p

.).. '3 ~t/ ~.~'l?b)

Refueling Test Sequence

/

PARAMETER TEST MEASURED CONDITIONS Critical,HZP, FXYC ARO Map l>oo Computed

~adial 47%

Peaking Map 1'5o?-

Factor 95%

Map l'2.05 Salem I, Cycle 5 SALEM I, CYCLE IV ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA SHEET 3 (contd)

FLUX MAP RESULTS MEASURED VALUE TOP /,I °I BOT /1 :g k I

TOP I. '5 <6 ro r BOT L*~o'8'7 TOP /. > 3 >I BOT D se~l 7

,,.~

f*

Rx. ENG MAN PART 200 -t-REQUIRED REQUIREMENT VALUE REFERENCE RTP L

""p-LF T.S. 3.2.2 1~~5 -1 ~!f e (INFO)

1. 67 2.004

1. 65

/,%°,1y3 T.S. 3.2.2

1. 67

/,~L/6'1

1. 65

/,J,S yg-T.S. 3.2.2

1. 67 IJ.L.'i..Z Refueling Test Sequence

0 I

N 4f

• ENG MAN PART 200 FIGURE A-1 (FSAR_.J'~g 14.0-5)

PCM PER PERCENT POWER I -

0 I -

N f\\'1/\\STER I

I I

0.-----r----..-----.----..... ----..... ----..-----..-----,...----.~-.""""

~

0 0 - -

N gp-g !i c

.i **

~

~-

s;;*

a 0

N c:

c:

om 1:

(")

SC 0

~

r-,.,

r-,.,

i 3~ *!

... -~

,.. ~ --

~g a*.,.,

... 0

... Ct....

ft -c n-c II..,.

,8 0 -*

s

.. r-I

'II&,.,

l>

l>..

Salem 1, Cycle s Page 20 Refueling Test Sequence JAN 1 3 1983 BX ENGR DEPT I

,J