ML18040A810: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:DISTRIBUTION CODE:AOOIDCOPIEBRECEIVED:
{{#Wiki_filter:DISTRIBUTION CODE: AOOID COPIEB RECEIVED: LTR 5 CL TITLE: OR Submi t ta1: Cen era I Di str i b ut i on REQUL Y INFORMATION DISTRIBUTI SYSTEN (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR: 8608110179 DOC.DATE: 86/08/05 NOTARI ZED: YES DOCKET N FACIL: 50-387 Susquehanna Steam Electric Stationi Unit ii Pennsglva 05000387 50-388 Susquehanna Steam Electric Statloni Unl t 2i Pennsglva 05000388 AUTH.NANE AUTHOR AFFILIATION KEI SERi H.N.Pennsylvania Power 5 Light Co.RECIP.NANE RECIPIENT AFFILIATION ADENSANi E.BNR Prospect Directorate 3  
LTR5CLTITLE:ORSubmitta1:CeneraIDistributionREQULYINFORMATION DISTRIBUTI SYSTEN(RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:8608110179 DOC.DATE:86/08/05NOTARIZED:YESDOCKETNFACIL:50-387Susquehanna SteamElectricStationiUnitiiPennsglva 0500038750-388Susquehanna SteamElectricStatloniUnlt2iPennsglva 05000388AUTH.NANEAUTHORAFFILIATION KEISERiH.N.Pennsylvania Power5LightCo.RECIP.NANERECIPIENT AFFILIATION ADENSANiE.BNRProspectDirectorate 3


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Forwardsapplication PolPloposedAmends85Cc40toLicensesNPF-14~cNPF-22'espectively>
Forwards application Pol Ploposed Amends 85 Cc 40 to Licenses NPF-14~c NPF-22'espectively>
revisingTechSpecsfor~~badministrative purposes.
revising Tech Specs for~~b administrative purposes.Fee paid.~~~b IZE: 2 lQ)NOTES: icy NNSS/FCAF/PN.
Feepaid.~~~bIZE:2lQ)NOTES:icyNNSS/FCAF/PN.
LPDR 2cgs Transcripts.
LPDR2cgsTranscripts.
icg NNSS/FCAF/PN.
icgNNSS/FCAF/PN.
LPDR 2cgs Transcripts.
LPDR2cgsTranscripts.
05000387 05000388 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAt'lE BNR EB BNR FOB BNR PD3 PD 01 BNR PSB COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 5 5 1 REC IP l ENT ID CODE/MANE BNR EICSB BNR PD3 LA CAMPAQNONE BNR RSB COPIES LTTR ENCL 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 INTERNAL ACRS ELD/HDS4 09 04 6 h 0 1 ADN/LFNB NRR/GRAS RQNi 0 1 0 1 EXTERNAL: EC8cQ BRUSKE>8 NRC PDR 02 1 1 1 1 LPDR NSIC 03 05 2 2 1 1 NOTES: 3 3~C~~i66 TOTAL NUNBER OF COPIES REGUlRED: LTTR 32 ENCL 28
0500038705000388RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAt'lE BNREBBNRFOBBNRPD3PD01BNRPSBCOPIESLTTRENCL111551RECIPlENTIDCODE/MANE BNREICSBBNRPD3LACAMPAQNONE BNRRSBCOPIESLTTRENCL2201111INTERNALACRSELD/HDS409046h01ADN/LFNBNRR/GRASRQNi0101EXTERNAL:
>J ('j(M ('><<,~7 T M C A>>M>~f<<1FM Il">">,>.I'hl'I, j[~>>>j g c,'j.3~C," (>>.)'L'I':S'>'j">(';A q<<(I'!*<<>I>''(11I 1 ,(M,j<<.;,;.>,',('.>..j<<,''(5 14),-,.Fh>,(yj C'><<" (>>" 1'h(>f)0),",>~)>tr>><<>I(j (>M I.>r M>P>C yrf f>F, hg FII" h>'~>L'M>h)f>!M g1 RAG jl(ht W>I>tj>(>j',h lQ.>Q'<,)'" h,.'rj FI I ,i N, (i 3.",.>j<<'h;3 f>y~,'
EC8cQBRUSKE>8NRCPDR021111LPDRNSIC03052211NOTES:33~C~~i66TOTALNUNBEROFCOPIESREGUlRED:
Pennsylvania Power 8 Light Company Two North Ninth Street~Allentown, PA 18101~215 i 770.5151 Harold W.Keiser Vice President-Nuclear Operations 21 5/770-7502 AUG 0 5]986.Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:
LTTR32ENCL28
Ms.E.Adensam, Project Director BWR Project Directorate No.3 Division of BWR Licensing U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555 SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION PROPOSED AMENDMENTS 85 TO LICENSE NO.NPF-14 AND 40 to LICENSE NO.NPF-22 PLA-2698 FILE R41-2 Docket Nos.50-387 50-388  
>J('j(M('><<,~7TMCA>>M>~f<<1FMIl">">,>.I'hl'I,j[~>>>jgc,'j.3~C,"(>>.)'L'I':S'>'j">(';Aq<<(I'!*<<>I>''(11I1,(M,j<<.;,;.>,',('.>..j<<,''(5 14),-,.Fh>,(yjC'><<"(>>"1'h(>f)0),",>~)>tr>><<>I(j(>MI.>rM>P>Cyrff>F,hgFII"h>'~>L'M>h)f>!Mg1RAGjl(htW>I>tj>(>j',hlQ.>Q'<,)'"h,.'rjFII,iN,(i3.",.>j<<'h;3 f>y~,'
Pennsylvania Power8LightCompanyTwoNorthNinthStreet~Allentown, PA18101~215i770.5151HaroldW.KeiserVicePresident-Nuclear Operations 215/770-7502 AUG05]986.DirectorofNuclearReactorRegulation Attention:
Ms.E.Adensam,ProjectDirectorBWRProjectDirectorate No.3DivisionofBWRLicensing U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555SUSQUEHANNA STEAMELECTRICSTATIONPROPOSEDAMENDMENTS 85TOLICENSENO.NPF-14AND40toLICENSENO.NPF-22PLA-2698FILER41-2DocketNos.50-38750-388


==DearMs.Adensam:==
==Dear Ms.Adensam:==
Thepurposeofthisletteristoproposechangesofanadministrative naturetotheSusquehanna SESUnit1andUnit2Technical Specifications.
The purpose of this letter is to propose changes of an administrative nature to the Susquehanna SES Unit 1 and Unit 2 Technical Specifications.
Themarked-up changesand,NoSignificant HazardsConsiderations areprovidedasattachments tothisletter.Anyquestions onthismaterialshouldbedirectedtoMr.R.Sgarroat(215)770-7855.
The marked-up changes and, No Significant Hazards Considerations are provided as attachments to this letter.Any questions on this material should be directed to Mr.R.Sgarro at (215)770-7855.Pursuant to 10CFR170,'he appropriate fee is enclosed.'ery truly yours, H.W.Keiser Vice President-Nuclear Operations Attachments cc: M.J.Campagnone L.R.Plisco USNRC USNRC T.M.Gerusky, Director Bureau of Radiation Protection PA Dept.of Environmental Resources P.O.Box 2063 Harrisburg, PA 17120](<0 8608110179 860805~PDR*DOCK 05000387 P PDR k~,~'t A il 0)k~I k k Ak I, IA j tg NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATIONS The ma)ority of the changes described below are obviously administrative in nature and therefore do not: 4 (1)involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated, (2)(3)create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated, nor 1 involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.Where further clarification is required, it has been provided.UNIT ONE o Index: Various changes based upon the changes proposed herein as well as a review of the current document in its entirety.o p.1-1: Average Bundle Exposure and Average Planar Exposure have been grouped under"Average Exposure" so that both have reference numbers.o p.3/4 0-1: For consistency, ACTION should be in all capital letters;it is a defined term.0 p.3/4 0-2: Typographical error;"Specifications" is misspelled.
Pursuantto10CFR170,'he appropriate feeisenclosed.
I p.3/4 2-1: The asterisk was inadvertently omitted when a reference to Figure 3.2.1-3 was dropped in Amendment 57.The asterisk was present when the Amendment governing single loop operation (//56)was issued.o old p.3/4 2-2: Delete blank page.o old p.3/4 2-3: Renumber page due to deletion.o old p.3/4 2-4: Renumber page due to deletion.o old p.3/4 2-5: Renumber page due to deletion.o old p.3/4 2>>6: A 4.0.4 exemption is necessary to perform the subject surveillances.
'erytrulyyours,H.W.KeiserVicePresident-Nuclear Operations Attachments cc:M.J.Campagnone L.R.PliscoUSNRCUSNRCT.M.Gerusky,DirectorBureauofRadiation Protection PADept.ofEnvironmental Resources P.O.Box2063Harrisburg, PA17120](<08608110179 860805~PDR*DOCK05000387PPDR k~,~'tAil0)k~IkkAkI,IAjtg NOSIGNIFICANT HAZARDSCONSIDERATIONS Thema)orityofthechangesdescribed belowareobviously administrative innatureandtherefore donot:4(1)involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated, (2)(3)createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated, nor1involveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Wherefurtherclarification isrequired, ithasbeenprovided.
Such exemptions were provided for the affected Power Distribution Limit specifications via Amendment 29;this exemption, for MCPR, was inadvertently dropped when the MCPR specification was altered in support of the Cycle 2 reload (Amendment 45).(g o old p.3/4 2-7: Delete blank page.o old p.3/4 2-8: Renumber page due to deletions.
UNITONEoIndex:Variouschangesbaseduponthechangesproposedhereinaswellasareviewofthecurrentdocumentinitsentirety.
o old p.3/4 2-9: Renumber page due to deletions.
op.1-1:AverageBundleExposureandAveragePlanarExposurehavebeengroupedunder"AverageExposure" sothatbothhavereference numbers.op.3/40-1:Forconsistency, ACTIONshouldbeinallcapitalletters;itisadefinedterm.0p.3/40-2:Typographical error;"Specifications" ismisspelled.
o old p.3/4 2-10: Renumber page due to deletions.
Ip.3/42-1:Theasteriskwasinadvertently omittedwhenareference toFigure3.2.1-3wasdroppedinAmendment 57.TheasteriskwaspresentwhentheAmendment governing singleloopoperation
o old p.3/4 2-10a: Renumber page due to deletions.;-
(//56)wasissued.ooldp.3/42-2:Deleteblankpage.ooldp.3/42-3:Renumberpageduetodeletion.
ooldp.3/42-4:Renumberpageduetodeletion.
ooldp.3/42-5:Renumberpageduetodeletion.
ooldp.3/42>>6:A4.0.4exemption isnecessary toperformthesubjectsurveillances.
Suchexemptions wereprovidedfortheaffectedPowerDistribution Limitspecifications viaAmendment 29;thisexemption, forMCPR,wasinadvertently droppedwhentheMCPRspecification wasalteredinsupportoftheCycle2reload(Amendment 45).(gooldp.3/42-7:Deleteblankpage.ooldp.3/42-8:Renumberpageduetodeletions.
ooldp.3/42-9:Renumberpageduetodeletions.
ooldp.3/42-10:Renumberpageduetodeletions.
ooldp.3/42-10a:Renumberpageduetodeletions.;-
1  
1  
'
'
ooldp.3/42-10b:Renumberpageduetodeletions.
o old p.3/4 2-10b: Renumber page due to deletions.
op.3/43-5:Note(i)hasbeenrevisedtoincorporate theasteriskratherthanrepeattheinformation providedinthefootnote.
o p.3/4 3-5: Note (i)has been revised to incorporate the asterisk rather than repeat the information provided in the footnote.The asterisk footnote was not deleted because it is already being used in Note (c).o p.3/4 3-11: I.The proposed change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
TheasteriskfootnotewasnotdeletedbecauseitisalreadybeingusedinNote(c).op.3/43-11:I.Theproposedchangedoesnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated.
This change corrects a typographical error;the design has always contained one channel per trip system.Secondary containment is isolated by two common, divisionally redundant trip systems;there are two divisionally separate radiation monitors servicing the single Railroad Access Shaft Exhaust Duct.Therefore, secondary containment isolation on high radiation in this duct is a fully redundant safety function.Operation with one Railroad Access Shaft Exhaust Duct Radiation trip channel pertrip system is fully consistent with the requirements for secondary containment isolation capability following a LOCA or fuel handling accident.II.The proposed change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; see I above.III.The proposed change does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety;see I above.o p.3/4 3-17: For trip function l.e, a typographical error has been corrected; this setpoint was approved by NRC in Amendment 58.For Trip Functions 2.c, d, and e, the footnote is being deleted since no changes were determined necessary as a result of the startup test program, and therefore the footnote no longer has any purpose.Also for 2.e, a typo in the setpoint units has been corrected.
Thischangecorrectsatypographical error;thedesignhasalwayscontained onechannelpertripsystem.Secondary containment isisolatedbytwocommon,divisionally redundant tripsystems;therearetwodivisionally separateradiation monitorsservicing thesingleRailroadAccessShaftExhaustDuct.Therefore, secondary containment isolation onhighradiation inthisductisafullyredundant safetyfunction.
For 3.a, a typo that occurred in Amendment 58 has been corrected.
Operation withoneRailroadAccessShaftExhaustDuctRadiation tripchannelpertripsystemisfullyconsistent withtherequirements forsecondary containment isolation capability following aLOCAorfuelhandlingaccident.
o p.3/4 3-18: See discussion above pertaining to footnote.o p.3/4 3-19: See discussion above pertaining to footnote.o p.3/4 3-20: See discussion above pertaining to footnote.0p.3/4 3-98: The word"Continued" has been deleted since this Table consists of only one page.p.3/4 4-1c: The appropriate MAPLHGR Figure references have been provided in order to correct administrative errors in processing.
II.Theproposedchangedoesnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated; seeIabove.III.Theproposedchangedoesnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety;seeIabove.op.3/43-17:Fortripfunctionl.e,atypographical errorhasbeencorrected; thissetpointwasapprovedbyNRCinAmendment 58.ForTripFunctions 2.c,d,ande,thefootnoteisbeingdeletedsincenochangesweredetermined necessary asaresultofthestartuptestprogram,andtherefore thefootnotenolongerhasanypurpose.Alsofor2.e,atypointhesetpointunitshasbeencorrected.
The current references reflect the original (April ll, 1985)Single Loop Operation (SLO)amendment submittal to NRC without taking into account the affects of the subsequent Cycle 3 reload submittal (January 16, 1986).Prior to the April 11th submittal, three Figures existed in the Unit 1 Tech Specs: Figure 3.2.1-1: GE 1.83%enriched, Figure 3.2.1-2: GE 2.33%enriched, and Figure 3.2.1-3: Exxon 2.72%enriched.When the SLO amendment was proposed, these Figures were not revised, but the GE 2.33%enriched Figure was used for the Exxon limit during SLO.Therefore, it was established that only the GE curves would be used in support of SLO.The Cycle 3 reload proposal was submitted prior to SLO being approved.That submittal left the Tech Specs with two MAPLHGR Figures: Figure 3.2.1-1: GE 2.33%enriched, and Figure 3.2.1-2: Exxon-all 8x8 fuel.This is where the appropriate changes were missed.The Tech Specs should have continued to reference the GE curve, Figure 3.2.1-1, for SLO.In part c.of the LCO, the Figure reference has been corrected due to a typographical error-it should be 3/4.1.1.1-1.
For3.a,atypothatoccurredinAmendment 58hasbeencorrected.
o p.3/4 5-1: This special test exception was renumbered due to the deletion of the current 3.10.5.p.3/4 6-10: This change is wholly administrative in nature;no technical changes have occurred.This footnote was originally proposed to clarify the requirements of 4.6.1.7 and ended up confusing them due to its dual meaning.It was added to ensure that where two elevations were listed (as in d;an asterisk exists on c because prior to Amendment 34, two elevations existed), both would not contribute to the minimum 3 values required.This is because those three are supposed to be representative of 3 of the 4 different areas being used for the average temperature calculation.
op.3/43-18:Seediscussion abovepertaining tofootnote.
If two had been used in the same area, it would skew the average toward the temperature'in that area.Unfortunately a more conservative interpretation leads one to believe that c and d~to ether are affected by the footnote and therefore, the measurements can only include one from a, one from b, and one from c and d together.In order to rectify these problems, a single area has been associated with each of the elevation categories and the footnote has been dropped.Accordingly,"elevations" has been replaced with"areas" in the text of 4.6.1.7.The areas listed are consistent with those currently listed in the associated procedure.
op.3/43-19:Seediscussion abovepertaining tofootnote.
o p.3/4 6-13: This requirement was inadvertently dropped by NRC when Amendment 36 was issued.It is being reinstated in its previous form.  
op.3/43-20:Seediscussion abovepertaining tofootnote.
0p.3/43-98:Theword"Continued" hasbeendeletedsincethisTableconsistsofonlyonepage.p.3/44-1c:Theappropriate MAPLHGRFigurereferences havebeenprovidedinordertocorrectadministrative errorsinprocessing.
Thecurrentreferences reflecttheoriginal(Aprilll,1985)SingleLoopOperation (SLO)amendment submittal toNRCwithouttakingintoaccounttheaffectsofthesubsequent Cycle3reloadsubmittal (January16,1986).PriortotheApril11thsubmittal, threeFiguresexistedintheUnit1TechSpecs:Figure3.2.1-1:GE1.83%enriched, Figure3.2.1-2:GE2.33%enriched, andFigure3.2.1-3:Exxon2.72%enriched.
WhentheSLOamendment wasproposed, theseFigureswerenotrevised,buttheGE2.33%enrichedFigurewasusedfortheExxonlimitduringSLO.Therefore, itwasestablished thatonlytheGEcurveswouldbeusedinsupportofSLO.TheCycle3reloadproposalwassubmitted priortoSLObeingapproved.
Thatsubmittal lefttheTechSpecswithtwoMAPLHGRFigures:Figure3.2.1-1:GE2.33%enriched, andFigure3.2.1-2:Exxon-all8x8fuel.Thisiswheretheappropriate changesweremissed.TheTechSpecsshouldhavecontinued toreference theGEcurve,Figure3.2.1-1,forSLO.Inpartc.oftheLCO,theFigurereference hasbeencorrected duetoatypographical error-itshouldbe3/4.1.1.1-1.
op.3/45-1:Thisspecialtestexception wasrenumbered duetothedeletionofthecurrent3.10.5.p.3/46-10:Thischangeiswhollyadministrative innature;notechnical changeshaveoccurred.
Thisfootnotewasoriginally proposedtoclarifytherequirements of4.6.1.7andendedupconfusing themduetoitsdualmeaning.Itwasaddedtoensurethatwheretwoelevations werelisted(asind;anasteriskexistsoncbecausepriortoAmendment 34,twoelevations existed),
bothwouldnotcontribute totheminimum3valuesrequired.
Thisisbecausethosethreearesupposedtoberepresentative of3ofthe4different areasbeingusedfortheaveragetemperature calculation.
Iftwohadbeenusedinthesamearea,itwouldskewtheaveragetowardthetemperature'in thatarea.Unfortunately amoreconservative interpretation leadsonetobelievethatcandd~toetherareaffectedbythefootnoteandtherefore, themeasurements canonlyincludeonefroma,onefromb,andonefromcanddtogether.
Inordertorectifytheseproblems, asingleareahasbeenassociated witheachoftheelevation categories andthefootnotehasbeendropped.Accordingly, "elevations" hasbeenreplacedwith"areas"inthetextof4.6.1.7.Theareaslistedareconsistent withthosecurrently listedintheassociated procedure.
op.3/46-13:Thisrequirement wasinadvertently droppedbyNRCwhenAmendment 36wasissued.Itisbeingreinstated initspreviousform.  


op.3/46-31:Thewordinghasbeenchangedtobeconsistent withtherestofthesurveillance requirements inthissection.Notechnical changetotherequirement hasoccurred.
o p.3/4 6-31: The wording has been changed to be consistent with the rest of the surveillance requirements in this section.No technical change to the requirement has occurred.o p.3/4 6-35: The equal sign was inadvertently dropped by NRC when Amendment 35 was issued.It is being reinstated.
op.3/46-35:Theequalsignwasinadvertently droppedbyNRCwhenAmendment 35wasissued.Itisbeingreinstated.
o p.3/4 6-38: This specification was misnumbered when the Unit 1 Tech Specs were originally issued.It has been appropriately corrected.
op.3/46-38:Thisspecification wasmisnumbered whentheUnit1TechSpecswereoriginally issued.Ithasbeenappropriately corrected.
o p.3/4 6-39: See discussion above for renumbering.
op.3/46-39:Seediscussion aboveforrenumbering.
The reference to the Special Test Exception is being dropped because the exception is being deleted.o p.3/4 7-2: Typographical error;"a" should be"at".o p.3/4 7-4: Typographical error;footnote**was deleted in Amendment 1 to the Unit 1 Tech Specs.o p.3/4 7-22: Typographical error;the correct designations for the Halon systems begin with"1U" not"10".o p.3/4 8-8: Typographical error;the heading should be"UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2" p.3/4 8-9: The footnote has been changed to be consistent with similar footnotes in other specifications (e.g.3.6.5.1).What appear to be additional restrictions merely enforce as an LCO what is currently required by the ACTION statement.
Thereference totheSpecialTestException isbeingdroppedbecausetheexception isbeingdeleted.op.3/47-2:Typographical error;"a"shouldbe"at".op.3/47-4:Typographical error;footnote**wasdeletedinAmendment 1totheUnit1TechSpecs.op.3/47-22:Typographical error;thecorrectdesignations fortheHalonsystemsbeginwith"1U"not"10".op.3/48-8:Typographical error;theheadingshouldbe"UNIT1ANDUNIT2"p.3/48-9:Thefootnotehasbeenchangedtobeconsistent withsimilarfootnotes inotherspecifications (e.g.3.6.5.1).
o p.3/4 8-15: See discussion above.o p.3/4 8>>19: Typographical errors;the header should be"DISTRIBUTION-SHUTDOWN" and the reference to"continued" is being deleted since this is the first page of the specification.
Whatappeartobeadditional restrictions merelyenforceasanLCOwhatiscurrently requiredbytheACTIONstatement.
o p.3/4 8-33: The reference to"plant" has been changed to"unit" since plant can be construed as both units.Unit 2 Tech Specs appropriately control this equipment for Unit 2.o p.3/4 9-1: Footnote!3 is being deleted since this definition is already provided in Table 1.2.p.3/4 10-4: A reference to the single loop operation specification has been added, since a footnote on the APPLICABILITY of that specification references this special test exception.
op.3/48-15:Seediscussion above.op.3/48>>19:Typographical errors;theheadershouldbe"DISTRIBUTION-SHUTDOWN" andthereference to"continued" isbeingdeletedsincethisisthefirstpageofthespecification.
The exception is provided in the event that natural circulation testing is necessary during extended single loo o eration.P P o p.3/4 10-5: This specification only applies during the Startup Test Program, and is therefore being deleted.
op.3/48-33:Thereference to"plant"hasbeenchangedto"unit"sinceplantcanbeconstrued asbothunits.Unit2TechSpecsappropriately controlthisequipment forUnit2.op.3/49-1:Footnote!3isbeingdeletedsincethisdefinition isalreadyprovidedinTable1.2.p.3/410-4:Areference tothesingleloopoperation specification hasbeenadded,sinceafootnoteontheAPPLICABILITY ofthatspecification references thisspecialtestexception.
o old p.3/4 10-6: Specification and page renumbered due to deletion of Specification 3.10.5.o p.3/4 11-19: Typographical error;the word"one" should be inserted as shown on the mark-up.o p.3/4 11-20: Typographical error;"OPERABLE" is misspelled.
Theexception isprovidedintheeventthatnaturalcirculation testingisnecessary duringextendedsingleloooeration.PPop.3/410-5:Thisspecification onlyappliesduringtheStartupTestProgram,andistherefore beingdeleted.
o p.B 3/4 1-1: This change corrects the definition of R provided;it is consistent with the change made in proposed amendment 39 to License No.NPF-22 (see PLA-2661, dated June 19, 1986).o p.B 3/4 1-4: The additional information was simply extracted from page B 3/4 1-5, which is being deleted.o p.B 3/4 1-5: Delete;see discussion above.0 Generator E bldg., have been o p.5-4: See discussion above.p.B 3/4 10-1: Delete;the associated specification is being deleted.p.5-2: A new figure is being provided to reflect real estate transactions which have changed the PP6L property line.Other physical changes, such as the additions to the Training Center and the new Diesel added as well.o p.6-16: Typographical error;the correct word is"residual".
ooldp.3/410-6:Specification andpagerenumbered duetodeletionofSpecification 3.10.5.op.3/411-19:Typographical error;theword"one"shouldbeinsertedasshownonthemark-up.op.3/411-20:Typographical error;"OPERABLE" ismisspelled.
UNIT TWO o Index: Various changes based upon the changes proposed herein as well as a review of the current document in its entirety.o p.3/4 0-1: For consistency, ACTION should be in all capital letters;it is a defined term.o p.3/4 0-2: Typographical error;"Specifications" is misspelled.
op.B3/41-1:Thischangecorrectsthedefinition ofRprovided; itisconsistent withthechangemadeinproposedamendment 39toLicenseNo.NPF-22(seePLA-2661, datedJune19,1986).op.B3/41-4:Theadditional information wassimplyextracted frompageB3/41-5,whichisbeingdeleted.op.B3/41-5:Delete;seediscussion above.0Generator Ebldg.,havebeenop.5-4:Seediscussion above.p.B3/410-1:Delete;theassociated specification isbeingdeleted.p.5-2:Anewfigureisbeingprovidedtoreflectrealestatetransactions whichhavechangedthePP6Lpropertyline.Otherphysicalchanges,suchastheadditions totheTrainingCenterandthenewDieseladdedaswell.op.6-16:Typographical error;thecorrectwordis"residual".
o p.3/4 1-6: The deleted portion of this footnote is redundant to information already provided by Definition 1.7, CORE ALTERATION.
UNITTWOoIndex:Variouschangesbaseduponthechangesproposedhereinaswellasareviewofthecurrentdocumentinitsentirety.
o p.3/4 3-5: Note (i)has been revised to incorporate the asterisk rather than repeat the information provided in the footnote.The asterisk footnote was not deleted because it is already being used in Note (c).o p.3/4 3-11: I.The proposed change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
op.3/40-1:Forconsistency, ACTIONshouldbeinallcapitalletters;itisadefinedterm.op.3/40-2:Typographical error;"Specifications" ismisspelled.
This change corrects a typographical error;t'e design has always contained one channel per trip system.Secondary containment is isolated by two common, divisionally redundant trip systems;there are two divisionally separate radiation monitors servicing the single Railroad Access Shaft Exhaust Duct.Therefore, secondary containment isolation on high radiation in this duct is a fully redundant safety function.Operation with one Railroad Access Shaft Exhaust Duct Radiation trip channel per trip system is fully consistent with the requirements for secondary containment isolation capability following a LOCA or fuel handling accident.II.The proposed change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; see I above.III.The proposed change does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety;see I above.o p.3/4 3-17: The footnote is being deleted since no changes were determined necessary as a result of the startup test program, and therefore the footnote no longer has any purpose.o p.3/4 3-18: See discussion above.o p.3/4 3-19: See discussion above.o p.3/4 3-20: See discussion above.
op.3/41-6:Thedeletedportionofthisfootnoteisredundant toinformation alreadyprovidedbyDefinition 1.7,COREALTERATION.
o p.3/4 3-53: Typographical error;footnote*~*should read"...eight or fewer ll o p.3/4 3-71: Typographical error;this footnote was erroneously attributed to a monitor which does not monitor secondary containment.
op.3/43-5:Note(i)hasbeenrevisedtoincorporate theasteriskratherthanrepeattheinformation providedinthefootnote.
This footnote does not exist for this monitor in the Unit 1 Tech Specs.o p.3/4 3-72: Typographical error;the redundant wording in ACTION 81 is being deleted.o p.3/4 3-78: Corrects to be consistent with Unit,1 Tech Specs for this common zone.This resolves an NRC inspector open item.o p.3/4 3-79: For Zone 0-27B, the minimum value is revised to be consistent with our philosophy that at least half of the detectors in a given Zone must be OPERABLE.This is consistent with Unit 1.For Zone 0-27C, the numbers are corrected for consistency with Unit 1 based on the associated design drawing.These changes resolve an NRC inspector open item.o p.3/4 4-1c: In part c.of the LCO, the Figure reference has been corrected due to a typographical error-it should be 3/4.1.1.1-1.
TheasteriskfootnotewasnotdeletedbecauseitisalreadybeingusedinNote(c).op.3/43-11:I.Theproposedchangedoesnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated.
o p.3/4 4-3: Typographical error-the correct Specification is 3.4.1.1.1.
Thischangecorrectsatypographical error;t'edesignhasalwayscontained onechannelpertripsystem.Secondary containment isisolatedbytwocommon,divisionally redundant tripsystems;therearetwodivisionally separateradiation monitorsservicing thesingleRailroadAccessShaftExhaustDuct.Therefore, secondary containment isolation onhighradiation inthisductisafullyredundant safetyfunction.
o p.3/4 5-1: This special test exception was renumbered due to the deletion of the current 3.10.5.o p.3/4 6-10: This change is wholly administrative in nature;no technical changes have occurred.This footnote was originally proposed to clarify the requirements of 4.6.1.7 and ended up confusing them due to its dual meaning.It was added to ensure that where two elevations were listed (as in c and d)that they both would not contribute to the minimum 3 values required.This is because those three are supposed to be representative of 3 of the 4 different areas being used for the average temperature calculation.
Operation withoneRailroadAccessShaftExhaustDuctRadiation tripchannelpertripsystemisfullyconsistent withtherequirements forsecondary containment isolation capability following aLOCAorfuelhandlingaccident.
If two had been used in the same area, it would skew the average toward the temperature in that area.Unfortunately a more conservative interpretation leads one to believe that c and d~to ether are affected by the footnote and therefore, the measurements can only include one from a, one from b, and one from c and d together.In order to rectify these problems, a single area has been associated with each of the elevation categories and the footnote has been dropped.Accordingly,"elevations" has been replaced with"areas" in the text of 4.6.1.7.The areas listed are consistent with those currently listed in the associated procedure.
II.Theproposedchangedoesnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated; seeIabove.III.Theproposedchangedoesnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety;seeIabove.op.3/43-17:Thefootnoteisbeingdeletedsincenochangesweredetermined necessary asaresultofthestartuptestprogram,andtherefore thefootnotenolongerhasanypurpose.op.3/43-18:Seediscussion above.op.3/43-19:Seediscussion above.op.3/43-20:Seediscussion above.
p.3/4 6-31: Typographical error;footnote**should read,"...or Zone II and Zone III when p.3/4 6-41: The reference to the Special Test Exception is being dropped because the exception is being deleted.o p.3/4 7-2: Typographical error;"a" should be"at".  
op.3/43-53:Typographical error;footnote*~*shouldread"...eightorfewerllop.3/43-71:Typographical error;thisfootnotewaserroneously attributed toamonitorwhichdoesnotmonitorsecondary containment.
ThisfootnotedoesnotexistforthismonitorintheUnit1TechSpecs.op.3/43-72:Typographical error;theredundant wordinginACTION81isbeingdeleted.op.3/43-78:Correctstobeconsistent withUnit,1TechSpecsforthiscommonzone.ThisresolvesanNRCinspector openitem.op.3/43-79:ForZone0-27B,theminimumvalueisrevisedtobeconsistent withourphilosophy thatatleasthalfofthedetectors inagivenZonemustbeOPERABLE.
Thisisconsistent withUnit1.ForZone0-27C,thenumbersarecorrected forconsistency withUnit1basedontheassociated designdrawing.ThesechangesresolveanNRCinspector openitem.op.3/44-1c:Inpartc.oftheLCO,theFigurereference hasbeencorrected duetoatypographical error-itshouldbe3/4.1.1.1-1.
op.3/44-3:Typographical error-thecorrectSpecification is3.4.1.1.1.
op.3/45-1:Thisspecialtestexception wasrenumbered duetothedeletionofthecurrent3.10.5.op.3/46-10:Thischangeiswhollyadministrative innature;notechnical changeshaveoccurred.
Thisfootnotewasoriginally proposedtoclarifytherequirements of4.6.1.7andendedupconfusing themduetoitsdualmeaning.Itwasaddedtoensurethatwheretwoelevations werelisted(asincandd)thattheybothwouldnotcontribute totheminimum3valuesrequired.
Thisisbecausethosethreearesupposedtoberepresentative of3ofthe4different areasbeingusedfortheaveragetemperature calculation.
Iftwohadbeenusedinthesamearea,itwouldskewtheaveragetowardthetemperature inthatarea.Unfortunately amoreconservative interpretation leadsonetobelievethatcandd~toetherareaffectedbythefootnoteandtherefore, themeasurements canonlyincludeonefroma,onefromb,andonefromcanddtogether.
Inordertorectifytheseproblems, asingleareahasbeenassociated witheachoftheelevation categories andthefootnotehasbeendropped.Accordingly, "elevations" hasbeenreplacedwith"areas"inthetextof4.6.1.7.Theareaslistedareconsistent withthosecurrently listedintheassociated procedure.
p.3/46-31:Typographical error;footnote**shouldread,"...orZoneIIandZoneIIIwhenp.3/46-41:Thereference totheSpecialTestException isbeingdroppedbecausetheexception isbeingdeleted.op.3/47-2:Typographical error;"a"shouldbe"at".  


op.3/48-10:Thefootnotehasbeenchangedtobeconsistent withsimilarfootnotes inotherspecifications (e.g.3.6.5.1).
o p.3/4 8-10: The footnote has been changed to be consistent with similar footnotes in other specifications (e.g.3.6.5.1).What appear to be additional restrictions thereby enforce as an LCO what is currently required by the ACTION statement.
Whatappeartobeadditional restrictions therebyenforceasanLCOwhatiscurrently requiredbytheACTIONstatement.
o p.3/4 8-16: See discussion above.o p.3/4 8-35: The reference to"plant" has been changed to"unit" since plant can be construed as both'units.
op.3/48-16:Seediscussion above.op.3/48-35:Thereference to"plant"hasbeenchangedto"unit"sinceplantcanbeconstrued asboth'units.
Unit 1 Tech Specs appropriately control this equipment for Unit 1.o p.3/4 9-1: Footnote f/is being deleted since this definition is already provided in Table 1.2.I o p.3/4 10-4: A reference to the single loop operation specification has been added, since a footnote on the APPLICABILITY of that specification references this special test exception.
Unit1TechSpecsappropriately controlthisequipment forUnit1.op.3/49-1:Footnotef/isbeingdeletedsincethisdefinition isalreadyprovidedinTable1.2.Iop.3/410-4:Areference tothesingleloopoperation specification hasbeenadded,sinceafootnoteontheAPPLICABILITY ofthatspecification references thisspecialtestexception.
The exception is provided in the event that natural circulation testing is necessary during extended single loop operation.
Theexception isprovidedintheeventthatnaturalcirculation testingisnecessary duringextendedsingleloopoperation.
o p.3/4 10-5: This specification only applies during the Startup Test Program, and is therefore being deleted.o old p.3/4 10-6: Specification and page renumbered due to deletion of Specification 3.10.5.o p.3/4 11-20: Typographical error;"OPERABLE" is misspelled.
op.3/410-5:Thisspecification onlyappliesduringtheStartupTestProgram,andistherefore beingdeleted.ooldp.3/410-6:Specification andpagerenumbered duetodeletionofSpecification 3.10.5.op.3/411-20:Typographical error;"OPERABLE" ismisspelled.
o p.B 3/4 10-1: Delete;the associated specification is being deleted.o p.5-2: A new figure is being provided to reflect real estate transactions which have changed the PPGL property line.Other physical changes, such as the addition to the Training Center and the new Diesel Generator"E" bldg., have been added as well.o p.5-4: See discussion above.o p.6-4: Typographical error;the noted reference to Unit 1 should be Unit 2.CONCLUSIONS Based on the above descriptions the proposed changes are editorial in nature and therefore have no adverse impact on the safe operation of Susquehanna Units 1 and 2.rrs/mse202550c}}
op.B3/410-1:Delete;theassociated specification isbeingdeleted.op.5-2:Anewfigureisbeingprovidedtoreflectrealestatetransactions whichhavechangedthePPGLpropertyline.Otherphysicalchanges,suchastheadditiontotheTrainingCenterandthenewDieselGenerator "E"bldg.,havebeenaddedaswell.op.5-4:Seediscussion above.op.6-4:Typographical error;thenotedreference toUnit1shouldbeUnit2.CONCLUSIONS Basedontheabovedescriptions theproposedchangesareeditorial innatureandtherefore havenoadverseimpactonthesafeoperation ofSusquehanna Units1and2.rrs/mse202550c}}

Revision as of 02:11, 6 July 2018

Forwards Application for Proposed Amends 85 & 40 to Licenses NPF-14 & NPF-22,respectively,revising Tech Specs for Administrative Purposes.Fee Paid
ML18040A810
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/05/1986
From: KEISER H W
PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: ADENSAM E
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17146A479 List:
References
PLA-2698, NUDOCS 8608110179
Download: ML18040A810 (16)


Text

DISTRIBUTION CODE: AOOID COPIEB RECEIVED: LTR 5 CL TITLE: OR Submi t ta1: Cen era I Di str i b ut i on REQUL Y INFORMATION DISTRIBUTI SYSTEN (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR: 8608110179 DOC.DATE: 86/08/05 NOTARI ZED: YES DOCKET N FACIL: 50-387 Susquehanna Steam Electric Stationi Unit ii Pennsglva 05000387 50-388 Susquehanna Steam Electric Statloni Unl t 2i Pennsglva 05000388 AUTH.NANE AUTHOR AFFILIATION KEI SERi H.N.Pennsylvania Power 5 Light Co.RECIP.NANE RECIPIENT AFFILIATION ADENSANi E.BNR Prospect Directorate 3

SUBJECT:

Forwards application Pol Ploposed Amends 85 Cc 40 to Licenses NPF-14~c NPF-22'espectively>

revising Tech Specs for~~b administrative purposes.Fee paid.~~~b IZE: 2 lQ)NOTES: icy NNSS/FCAF/PN.

LPDR 2cgs Transcripts.

icg NNSS/FCAF/PN.

LPDR 2cgs Transcripts.

05000387 05000388 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAt'lE BNR EB BNR FOB BNR PD3 PD 01 BNR PSB COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 5 5 1 REC IP l ENT ID CODE/MANE BNR EICSB BNR PD3 LA CAMPAQNONE BNR RSB COPIES LTTR ENCL 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 INTERNAL ACRS ELD/HDS4 09 04 6 h 0 1 ADN/LFNB NRR/GRAS RQNi 0 1 0 1 EXTERNAL: EC8cQ BRUSKE>8 NRC PDR 02 1 1 1 1 LPDR NSIC 03 05 2 2 1 1 NOTES: 3 3~C~~i66 TOTAL NUNBER OF COPIES REGUlRED: LTTR 32 ENCL 28

>J ('j(M ('><<,~7 T M C A>>M>~f<<1FM Il">">,>.I'hl'I, j[~>>>j g c,'j.3~C," (>>.)'L'I':S'>'j">(';A q<<(I'!*<<>I>(11I 1 ,(M,j<<.;,;.>,',('.>..j<<,(5 14),-,.Fh>,(yj C'><<" (>>" 1'h(>f)0),",>~)>tr>><<>I(j (>M I.>r M>P>C yrf f>F, hg FII" h>'~>L'M>h)f>!M g1 RAG jl(ht W>I>tj>(>j',h lQ.>Q'<,)'" h,.'rj FI I ,i N, (i 3.",.>j<<'h;3 f>y~,'

Pennsylvania Power 8 Light Company Two North Ninth Street~Allentown, PA 18101~215 i 770.5151 Harold W.Keiser Vice President-Nuclear Operations 21 5/770-7502 AUG 0 5]986.Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:

Ms.E.Adensam, Project Director BWR Project Directorate No.3 Division of BWR Licensing U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555 SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION PROPOSED AMENDMENTS 85 TO LICENSE NO.NPF-14 AND 40 to LICENSE NO.NPF-22 PLA-2698 FILE R41-2 Docket Nos.50-387 50-388

Dear Ms.Adensam:

The purpose of this letter is to propose changes of an administrative nature to the Susquehanna SES Unit 1 and Unit 2 Technical Specifications.

The marked-up changes and, No Significant Hazards Considerations are provided as attachments to this letter.Any questions on this material should be directed to Mr.R.Sgarro at (215)770-7855.Pursuant to 10CFR170,'he appropriate fee is enclosed.'ery truly yours, H.W.Keiser Vice President-Nuclear Operations Attachments cc: M.J.Campagnone L.R.Plisco USNRC USNRC T.M.Gerusky, Director Bureau of Radiation Protection PA Dept.of Environmental Resources P.O.Box 2063 Harrisburg, PA 17120](<0 8608110179 860805~PDR*DOCK 05000387 P PDR k~,~'t A il 0)k~I k k Ak I, IA j tg NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATIONS The ma)ority of the changes described below are obviously administrative in nature and therefore do not: 4 (1)involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated, (2)(3)create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated, nor 1 involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.Where further clarification is required, it has been provided.UNIT ONE o Index: Various changes based upon the changes proposed herein as well as a review of the current document in its entirety.o p.1-1: Average Bundle Exposure and Average Planar Exposure have been grouped under"Average Exposure" so that both have reference numbers.o p.3/4 0-1: For consistency, ACTION should be in all capital letters;it is a defined term.0 p.3/4 0-2: Typographical error;"Specifications" is misspelled.

I p.3/4 2-1: The asterisk was inadvertently omitted when a reference to Figure 3.2.1-3 was dropped in Amendment 57.The asterisk was present when the Amendment governing single loop operation (//56)was issued.o old p.3/4 2-2: Delete blank page.o old p.3/4 2-3: Renumber page due to deletion.o old p.3/4 2-4: Renumber page due to deletion.o old p.3/4 2-5: Renumber page due to deletion.o old p.3/4 2>>6: A 4.0.4 exemption is necessary to perform the subject surveillances.

Such exemptions were provided for the affected Power Distribution Limit specifications via Amendment 29;this exemption, for MCPR, was inadvertently dropped when the MCPR specification was altered in support of the Cycle 2 reload (Amendment 45).(g o old p.3/4 2-7: Delete blank page.o old p.3/4 2-8: Renumber page due to deletions.

o old p.3/4 2-9: Renumber page due to deletions.

o old p.3/4 2-10: Renumber page due to deletions.

o old p.3/4 2-10a: Renumber page due to deletions.;-

1

'

o old p.3/4 2-10b: Renumber page due to deletions.

o p.3/4 3-5: Note (i)has been revised to incorporate the asterisk rather than repeat the information provided in the footnote.The asterisk footnote was not deleted because it is already being used in Note (c).o p.3/4 3-11: I.The proposed change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.

This change corrects a typographical error;the design has always contained one channel per trip system.Secondary containment is isolated by two common, divisionally redundant trip systems;there are two divisionally separate radiation monitors servicing the single Railroad Access Shaft Exhaust Duct.Therefore, secondary containment isolation on high radiation in this duct is a fully redundant safety function.Operation with one Railroad Access Shaft Exhaust Duct Radiation trip channel pertrip system is fully consistent with the requirements for secondary containment isolation capability following a LOCA or fuel handling accident.II.The proposed change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; see I above.III.The proposed change does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety;see I above.o p.3/4 3-17: For trip function l.e, a typographical error has been corrected; this setpoint was approved by NRC in Amendment 58.For Trip Functions 2.c, d, and e, the footnote is being deleted since no changes were determined necessary as a result of the startup test program, and therefore the footnote no longer has any purpose.Also for 2.e, a typo in the setpoint units has been corrected.

For 3.a, a typo that occurred in Amendment 58 has been corrected.

o p.3/4 3-18: See discussion above pertaining to footnote.o p.3/4 3-19: See discussion above pertaining to footnote.o p.3/4 3-20: See discussion above pertaining to footnote.0p.3/4 3-98: The word"Continued" has been deleted since this Table consists of only one page.p.3/4 4-1c: The appropriate MAPLHGR Figure references have been provided in order to correct administrative errors in processing.

The current references reflect the original (April ll, 1985)Single Loop Operation (SLO)amendment submittal to NRC without taking into account the affects of the subsequent Cycle 3 reload submittal (January 16, 1986).Prior to the April 11th submittal, three Figures existed in the Unit 1 Tech Specs: Figure 3.2.1-1: GE 1.83%enriched, Figure 3.2.1-2: GE 2.33%enriched, and Figure 3.2.1-3: Exxon 2.72%enriched.When the SLO amendment was proposed, these Figures were not revised, but the GE 2.33%enriched Figure was used for the Exxon limit during SLO.Therefore, it was established that only the GE curves would be used in support of SLO.The Cycle 3 reload proposal was submitted prior to SLO being approved.That submittal left the Tech Specs with two MAPLHGR Figures: Figure 3.2.1-1: GE 2.33%enriched, and Figure 3.2.1-2: Exxon-all 8x8 fuel.This is where the appropriate changes were missed.The Tech Specs should have continued to reference the GE curve, Figure 3.2.1-1, for SLO.In part c.of the LCO, the Figure reference has been corrected due to a typographical error-it should be 3/4.1.1.1-1.

o p.3/4 5-1: This special test exception was renumbered due to the deletion of the current 3.10.5.p.3/4 6-10: This change is wholly administrative in nature;no technical changes have occurred.This footnote was originally proposed to clarify the requirements of 4.6.1.7 and ended up confusing them due to its dual meaning.It was added to ensure that where two elevations were listed (as in d;an asterisk exists on c because prior to Amendment 34, two elevations existed), both would not contribute to the minimum 3 values required.This is because those three are supposed to be representative of 3 of the 4 different areas being used for the average temperature calculation.

If two had been used in the same area, it would skew the average toward the temperature'in that area.Unfortunately a more conservative interpretation leads one to believe that c and d~to ether are affected by the footnote and therefore, the measurements can only include one from a, one from b, and one from c and d together.In order to rectify these problems, a single area has been associated with each of the elevation categories and the footnote has been dropped.Accordingly,"elevations" has been replaced with"areas" in the text of 4.6.1.7.The areas listed are consistent with those currently listed in the associated procedure.

o p.3/4 6-13: This requirement was inadvertently dropped by NRC when Amendment 36 was issued.It is being reinstated in its previous form.

o p.3/4 6-31: The wording has been changed to be consistent with the rest of the surveillance requirements in this section.No technical change to the requirement has occurred.o p.3/4 6-35: The equal sign was inadvertently dropped by NRC when Amendment 35 was issued.It is being reinstated.

o p.3/4 6-38: This specification was misnumbered when the Unit 1 Tech Specs were originally issued.It has been appropriately corrected.

o p.3/4 6-39: See discussion above for renumbering.

The reference to the Special Test Exception is being dropped because the exception is being deleted.o p.3/4 7-2: Typographical error;"a" should be"at".o p.3/4 7-4: Typographical error;footnote**was deleted in Amendment 1 to the Unit 1 Tech Specs.o p.3/4 7-22: Typographical error;the correct designations for the Halon systems begin with"1U" not"10".o p.3/4 8-8: Typographical error;the heading should be"UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2" p.3/4 8-9: The footnote has been changed to be consistent with similar footnotes in other specifications (e.g.3.6.5.1).What appear to be additional restrictions merely enforce as an LCO what is currently required by the ACTION statement.

o p.3/4 8-15: See discussion above.o p.3/4 8>>19: Typographical errors;the header should be"DISTRIBUTION-SHUTDOWN" and the reference to"continued" is being deleted since this is the first page of the specification.

o p.3/4 8-33: The reference to"plant" has been changed to"unit" since plant can be construed as both units.Unit 2 Tech Specs appropriately control this equipment for Unit 2.o p.3/4 9-1: Footnote!3 is being deleted since this definition is already provided in Table 1.2.p.3/4 10-4: A reference to the single loop operation specification has been added, since a footnote on the APPLICABILITY of that specification references this special test exception.

The exception is provided in the event that natural circulation testing is necessary during extended single loo o eration.P P o p.3/4 10-5: This specification only applies during the Startup Test Program, and is therefore being deleted.

o old p.3/4 10-6: Specification and page renumbered due to deletion of Specification 3.10.5.o p.3/4 11-19: Typographical error;the word"one" should be inserted as shown on the mark-up.o p.3/4 11-20: Typographical error;"OPERABLE" is misspelled.

o p.B 3/4 1-1: This change corrects the definition of R provided;it is consistent with the change made in proposed amendment 39 to License No.NPF-22 (see PLA-2661, dated June 19, 1986).o p.B 3/4 1-4: The additional information was simply extracted from page B 3/4 1-5, which is being deleted.o p.B 3/4 1-5: Delete;see discussion above.0 Generator E bldg., have been o p.5-4: See discussion above.p.B 3/4 10-1: Delete;the associated specification is being deleted.p.5-2: A new figure is being provided to reflect real estate transactions which have changed the PP6L property line.Other physical changes, such as the additions to the Training Center and the new Diesel added as well.o p.6-16: Typographical error;the correct word is"residual".

UNIT TWO o Index: Various changes based upon the changes proposed herein as well as a review of the current document in its entirety.o p.3/4 0-1: For consistency, ACTION should be in all capital letters;it is a defined term.o p.3/4 0-2: Typographical error;"Specifications" is misspelled.

o p.3/4 1-6: The deleted portion of this footnote is redundant to information already provided by Definition 1.7, CORE ALTERATION.

o p.3/4 3-5: Note (i)has been revised to incorporate the asterisk rather than repeat the information provided in the footnote.The asterisk footnote was not deleted because it is already being used in Note (c).o p.3/4 3-11: I.The proposed change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.

This change corrects a typographical error;t'e design has always contained one channel per trip system.Secondary containment is isolated by two common, divisionally redundant trip systems;there are two divisionally separate radiation monitors servicing the single Railroad Access Shaft Exhaust Duct.Therefore, secondary containment isolation on high radiation in this duct is a fully redundant safety function.Operation with one Railroad Access Shaft Exhaust Duct Radiation trip channel per trip system is fully consistent with the requirements for secondary containment isolation capability following a LOCA or fuel handling accident.II.The proposed change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; see I above.III.The proposed change does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety;see I above.o p.3/4 3-17: The footnote is being deleted since no changes were determined necessary as a result of the startup test program, and therefore the footnote no longer has any purpose.o p.3/4 3-18: See discussion above.o p.3/4 3-19: See discussion above.o p.3/4 3-20: See discussion above.

o p.3/4 3-53: Typographical error;footnote*~*should read"...eight or fewer ll o p.3/4 3-71: Typographical error;this footnote was erroneously attributed to a monitor which does not monitor secondary containment.

This footnote does not exist for this monitor in the Unit 1 Tech Specs.o p.3/4 3-72: Typographical error;the redundant wording in ACTION 81 is being deleted.o p.3/4 3-78: Corrects to be consistent with Unit,1 Tech Specs for this common zone.This resolves an NRC inspector open item.o p.3/4 3-79: For Zone 0-27B, the minimum value is revised to be consistent with our philosophy that at least half of the detectors in a given Zone must be OPERABLE.This is consistent with Unit 1.For Zone 0-27C, the numbers are corrected for consistency with Unit 1 based on the associated design drawing.These changes resolve an NRC inspector open item.o p.3/4 4-1c: In part c.of the LCO, the Figure reference has been corrected due to a typographical error-it should be 3/4.1.1.1-1.

o p.3/4 4-3: Typographical error-the correct Specification is 3.4.1.1.1.

o p.3/4 5-1: This special test exception was renumbered due to the deletion of the current 3.10.5.o p.3/4 6-10: This change is wholly administrative in nature;no technical changes have occurred.This footnote was originally proposed to clarify the requirements of 4.6.1.7 and ended up confusing them due to its dual meaning.It was added to ensure that where two elevations were listed (as in c and d)that they both would not contribute to the minimum 3 values required.This is because those three are supposed to be representative of 3 of the 4 different areas being used for the average temperature calculation.

If two had been used in the same area, it would skew the average toward the temperature in that area.Unfortunately a more conservative interpretation leads one to believe that c and d~to ether are affected by the footnote and therefore, the measurements can only include one from a, one from b, and one from c and d together.In order to rectify these problems, a single area has been associated with each of the elevation categories and the footnote has been dropped.Accordingly,"elevations" has been replaced with"areas" in the text of 4.6.1.7.The areas listed are consistent with those currently listed in the associated procedure.

p.3/4 6-31: Typographical error;footnote**should read,"...or Zone II and Zone III when p.3/4 6-41: The reference to the Special Test Exception is being dropped because the exception is being deleted.o p.3/4 7-2: Typographical error;"a" should be"at".

o p.3/4 8-10: The footnote has been changed to be consistent with similar footnotes in other specifications (e.g.3.6.5.1).What appear to be additional restrictions thereby enforce as an LCO what is currently required by the ACTION statement.

o p.3/4 8-16: See discussion above.o p.3/4 8-35: The reference to"plant" has been changed to"unit" since plant can be construed as both'units.

Unit 1 Tech Specs appropriately control this equipment for Unit 1.o p.3/4 9-1: Footnote f/is being deleted since this definition is already provided in Table 1.2.I o p.3/4 10-4: A reference to the single loop operation specification has been added, since a footnote on the APPLICABILITY of that specification references this special test exception.

The exception is provided in the event that natural circulation testing is necessary during extended single loop operation.

o p.3/4 10-5: This specification only applies during the Startup Test Program, and is therefore being deleted.o old p.3/4 10-6: Specification and page renumbered due to deletion of Specification 3.10.5.o p.3/4 11-20: Typographical error;"OPERABLE" is misspelled.

o p.B 3/4 10-1: Delete;the associated specification is being deleted.o p.5-2: A new figure is being provided to reflect real estate transactions which have changed the PPGL property line.Other physical changes, such as the addition to the Training Center and the new Diesel Generator"E" bldg., have been added as well.o p.5-4: See discussion above.o p.6-4: Typographical error;the noted reference to Unit 1 should be Unit 2.CONCLUSIONS Based on the above descriptions the proposed changes are editorial in nature and therefore have no adverse impact on the safe operation of Susquehanna Units 1 and 2.rrs/mse202550c