ML17059B241: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:ENCLOSMILEPOINT1CORESHROUDREPAIRMODIFICATION SARYREPORT96082iOi35 9608i4'DRADQCK,05000220,. | ||
P~',PDR | |||
GENuclearfnerqyGENEB13-P1739- | GENuclearfnerqyGENEB13-P1739-31 Revision0August1996NineMilePoint1CoreShroudRepairModification SummaryReportPreparedfor.NiagaraMohawkPowerCorporation Preparedby:GENuclearEnergyReactorModification Services175CurtnerAvenue,N/C571SanJose,California 95125 | ||
GENuclearE'nergyGENEB13-01739- | GENuclearE'nergyGENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1996NineMilePoint1CoreShroudRepairModification SummaryReportPreparedby:&-/Z-K,TE.Gleason,Principal EngineerReactorModification ServicesReviewedby:Approvedby:N.R.Schrag,IncipalEngineerReactorModification Services<l~jg,S.Ranganath, Engineering FellowGENuclearEnergy | ||
GENEB13-01739- | GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1996REVISIONSTATUSSHEETRevisionApprovalS.Ranganath DateInitialIssueDescription | ||
GENEB13-P1739- | GENEB13-P1739-31 Revision0August1998IMPORTANT NOTICEREGARDING CONTENTSOFTHISREPORTPleaseReadCarefully ThisreportwaspreparedbyGeneralElectricsolelyfortheuseoftheNiagaraMohawkPowerCorporation. | ||
Theinformation contained inthisreportisbelievedbyGeneralElectrictobeanaccurateandtruerepresentation ofthefactsknown,obtainedorprovidedtoGeneralElectricatthetimethisreportwasprepared. | |||
Theonlyundertakings oftheGeneralElectricCompanyrespecting information inthisdocumentarecontained inthecontractgoverning thiswork,andnothingcontained inthisdocumentshallbeconstrued aschangingsaidcontract. | |||
Theuseofthisinformation exceptasdefinedbysaidcontract, orforanypurposeotherthanthatforwhichitisintended, isnotauthorized; andwithrespecttoanysuchunauthorized use,neitherGeneralElectricCompanynoranyofthecontributors tothisdocumentmakesanyrepresentation orwarranty(expressorimplied)astothecompleteness, accuracyofusefulness oftheinformation contained inthisdocumentorthatsuchuseofsuchinformation maynotinfringeprivately ownedrights;nordotheyassumeanyresponsibility forliability ofdamageofanykindwhichmayresultfromsuchuseofsuchinformation. | |||
GENEB13-01739- | GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1996CONTENTSl.INTRODUCTION 2.SUMMARYANDCONCLUSIONS 3.TIERODREPLACEMENT MODIFICATION 4.H6ACONTACTEXTENSION 5.DISPLACEMENT SUMMARY6.DESIGNBASIS7.SAFETYCONSIDERATIONS 8.ATTACHMENTS | ||
GENEB13-01739- | GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1998l.INTRODUCTION Acoreshroudrepairmodification wasinstalled inNineMilePoint1NuclearPowerPlanttoprovideanalternate loadpathfortheType304stainless steelcircumferential welds,HlthroughH7.Thecoreshroudrepairensuresthestructural integrity ofthecoreshroudbyreplacing thefunctionofweldsHlthroughH7with4stabilizer assemblies, andfourcoreplatewedges.Inthecourseofthepost-installation inspection oftheshroudrepair,threedeviations wereidentified, evaluated andwerefoundacceptable forcontinued plantoperation throughthenextcycle.Afteradditional reviewandevaluation, twoadditional modifications areproposedtoprovidethelongtermcorrective actions.1.1Modification 1:270'ieRodReplacement Thelowerspringofonestabilizer assemblybearsontheblendradiusofthe270'ecirculation nozzle.Theproposedmodification istoreplacethetierodandspringassemblywithonehavingthespringontheoppositesideofthetierod.Thisproposedmodification relocates thespringtobearontheRPVasintended. | ||
1.2ThelowerspringcontactwiththeshrouddoesnotextendbeyondweldH6Aatanyofthefourlocations. | |||
Asaresult,ifweldH6Aisfullycracked,andifthedesigncondition ofasteamlineLOCAplusseismiceventweretooccur,theshroudwouldnotbelaterally constrained totheextentintendedbydesign.Theproposedmodification addsanextension piecetoextendthespringcontactbeyondweldH6Aandrestorethisfeaturetoitsintendedfunction. | |||
Theextendedcontactandthecoreplatewedgesalsoprovidearedundant loadpathbetweenthecoreplateandthelowerspringaswasintendedintheoriginaldesign.Thismodification appliestothe90',166'nd350'tabilizer assemblies. | |||
Thedeviation iscorrected forthereplacement assemblyat270'.2.SUMMARYANDCONCLUSIONS 2.1270'ieRodReplacement Theshroudrepairstabilizer assemblies aredesignedwiththelowerspringlocatedonthesideofthetierod.Theproposedmodification istoreplacethetierodandspringassemblywithonehavingthespringontheoppositeside.Themodification movesthespringsufficiently suchthatitwillbearontheRPVasintended. | |||
Themodification utilizes | |||
GENEB13-01739- | GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1998existinghardwarewhichwasbuiltasasparealongwiththeotherstabilizer assemblies. | ||
Onlyminorreworkisrequiredtorelocatethelowerspringandthereworkhasnoaffectonthehardwarefunction. | |||
Themodification doesnotrequireadditional penetrations throughtheshroudsupportconeoranyadditional EDMwork.Themodification usesthesamelowersupportandupperspringassemblies andthereisnochangetotheactualtierodlocation. | |||
Additional analysishasbeendonetoaddressthedesignwherethelowerspringsarenolongerlocated90'part.Thenon-uniform lowerspringspacingaffectsthenetspringcharacteristic whenthehorizontal seismicloadisdirectedbetweentwosprings.Theanalysisshowtheloadsanddisplacements remainacceptable forallconditions. | |||
2.2H6AContactExtension ThelowerspringcontactswiththeshrouddonotextendabovetheH6Aweldaswasintended. | |||
ThedesignfunctioncanberestoredbyaddingaUshapedextension piecetoextendbeyondweldH6A.Theextension piecefitsovertheexistinglowercontactandiscapturedonthelowerextension inalldirections. | |||
Theextension isdesignedtoprovideapositivespringclampingforceagainstthesidesofthelowercontact.Thespringforceisnotrequiredtocapturethepartbutissufficient topreventanyfreemovementorvibrations. | |||
Withthisarrangement, theaddedextension pieceiscapturedinalldirections andisheldsecurebythespringloadedclampingforce.2.3Conclusions Themodifications totheshroudrepairstabilizers atNineMilePoint1willrestorethemtotheirintendeddesignfunction. | |||
Theplantlicensing baseshavebeenreviewed. | |||
Thisreviewdemonstrates thatthesemodifications canbeinstalled (1)withoutanincreaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentormalfunction previously evaluated, (2)withoutcreatingthepossibility ofanaccidentormalfunction ofanewordifferent kindfromanypreviously evaluated, (3)andwithoutreducingthemarginofsafetyinthebasesofaTechnical Specification. | |||
3.TIERODREPLACEMENT MODIFICATION | |||
===3.1Background=== | |||
Thelowerwedgeonthe270'ierodwasfoundtobearagainsttheblendradiusonarecirculation nozzleratherthanonthe'vessel wall.Thissituation isdocumented perFDDREAl-0032andfurtherevaluated inGElKB13-01739-25. | |||
Thatreportaddressed concernsaboutthecontactareaandthestability ofthecontactontheinclinedsurfaceofthenozzleblendradius. | |||
GENEB13-01739- | GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1998Thelowerwedgecanberelocated toapositionwithmorecompleted contact(Figure3.1)onthevesselbymovingthelowerspringtotheoppositesideofthestabilizer assembly. | ||
Byrelocating thelowerspring,theconcernsaboutcontactstability andcontactareaareresolvedandthestabilizer assemblymaintains itsintendedfunctional requirements. | |||
IIIIIIIIIIII1i\'IiNozzleBoundary[2'ldLncaIion//I/Nc~LocnlionII.2ln.FIGURE3.13.2.Description NiagaraMohawkPowerCorporation purchased asparetierodassemblyandthisassemblyisintendedtobemodifiedtothealternate configuration. | |||
Applicable designandassemblydrawingsarerevisedtoincludethenewpartsandgroupswhichdefinethealternate configuration. | |||
Alladditional partsandassemblies aredesignedandfabricated tothesamedesignbasisastheoriginalshroudrepairhardware. | |||
Movingthelowerspringtotheoppositesideofthestabilizer assemblyisaccomplished bythestepslistedbelow.a.Removethelowerspringfromtheexistingspareassemblyandthelowercontactfromtheexistinglowerspring.Thestakedlockingpinswillhavetoberemovedtoaccomplish this.Newlockingpinswillhavetobeinstalled inslightlydifferent locations, butthiswillnotaffectthefunctionofthepart. | |||
GENEB13-01739- | GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1998b.Modifythelowerspringbyaddingcounterbores totheoppositesideoftheboltholes.Havingcounterbores onbothsidesdoesnotaffectthefunctionofthepart.c.ModifytheC-springbyextending the1.125diameterholethroughthepart.d.Fabricate anewlowercontactwiththeshroudsidedsurfacetaperedtofitontheoppositesideofthestabilizer assembly. | ||
ThenewlowercontactisalsodesignedtoextendbeyondtheH6Aweldtoavoidinstallation ofthecontactextension piece.e.Re-assemble thetierodassembly. | |||
f.Sincethelowerwedgeisatanewposition, newannulusmeasurements arerequiredandthenewlowerwedgemachinedtofitperthemodification drawing.g.Allchangeswillberecordedonamodification drawingrevision. | |||
Nochangesarerequiredfortheuppersupport,theupperspringandthemidsupport.3.3.FunctionThelowerspringisdesignedtorestrictthecoreplatedisplacement duringaseismicevent.Thestabilizer assemblyisdesignedforasinglelowerspringtocarrytheentirehorizontal seismicloadatthecoresupport.However,thedirection oftheloadmaybesuchthatmorethanonespringsharestheload.Thelimitingspringdeflection andspringloadsoccurwhenonlyoneofthelowerspringsreactstotheentirehorizontal load.Relocating thespringhasnoaffectonthemaximumspringloadormaximumspringdeflection. | |||
Relocating thelowerspringdoeschangethespacingbetweenadjacentspringsandthespacingdoesaffectthenetreactionwhentwospringssharethelateralload.ThelowerspringcontactwiththeRPVischangedbyabout4'ymovingittotheoppositesideoftheuerod.The4'hangefromtheas-installed locationresultsinamaximum108'pacing betweenadjacentlowersprings.Theminimumspacingbetweenadjacentlowerspringsis76'.Whenthefourlowerspringsare90'part,theequivalent springconstantisthesameforalldirections oftheappliedload.Theequivalent springconstantisthetotalloadappliedbythelowerspringsdividedbythedisplacement inthedirection oftheappliedload.Becauseofthenon-uniform springspacing,thevariation inequivalent springconstantis 1 | |||
GENEB13-D1739-31 RevisionDAugust1998from+24%to-31%.Anincreaseintheequivalent springconstanttendstoincreasethetotalreactionloadanddecreasethetotaldisplacement. | |||
Althoughthetotalreactionloadincreases, theloadissharedbytwospringsandtheloadoneitherspringisboundedbythecasewhereonespringcarriestheentireload.Adecreaseinequivalent springconstantresultsinalargerdisplacement inthedirection oftheload.Additional analysisinAttachments 8.1and8.2showallloadsanddisplacements remainacceptable forthismodification. | |||
4.H6ACONTACTEXTENSION 4.1.Background ThelowercontactsdonotextendabovetheH6Aweldaswasintendedtosatisfytheintendeddesignrequirements. | |||
TheReactorModification Drawing,107E5679Revision6,showstheas-installed positionofthelowercontactsandtheH6Aweld.Thesituation resultedfrominsufficient margininthelowercontactdesigntoaccountfortheuncertainties intheas-builtgeometryoftheshroudsupportcone.Thisabovedeviation fromtheintendeddesigncondition isdescribed andevaluated inFDDREAl-0031. | |||
Theevaluation showedthecoreplateboltsaresufficient tomaintainthecoreplatealignment withoutthelowercontactextending aboveweldH6A.Theevaluation considered theboltclampingloadandtheelasticproperties oftheboltstoshowallowable coreplatedisplacement wasnotexceeded.'dding theextension pieceprovidesadditional designmarginandassurance thatthecoreplatealignment ismaintained. | |||
4.2Description Thelowercontactsatazimuths90',166'nd350'remodifiedtoextendbeyondtheH6AweldbyaddingaUshapedextension pieceshowninFigure4.1.Theextension piecefitsovertheexistinglowercontactwiththelegsoftheUextending aroundthesidesoftheexistinglowercontact.Thestepsattheendsofthelegsfitunderthelowercontacttopreventaxialmovement. | |||
Atangatthetopextension fitsinthegapbetweenthelowercontactandthelowerspringtorestrictthehorizontal movement. | |||
Theaddedextension pieceiscapturedinalldirections ontheexistinglowercontact.Thelegsoftheextension provideapositivespringclampingforce(40lbto50lb)againstthesidesofthelowercontact.Thisforceissufficient topreventanyfreemovementorvibrations. | |||
Withthisarrangement, theaddedextension pieceiscapturedinalldirections andisheldsecurebythespringloadedclampingforce. | |||
GENEB13-01739- | GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1996TANGLLAi4IPLEGSTEPSFIGURE4.1Theaddedextension piecesareinstalled withaspecialtoolforhandlingandtokeepthelegssprungapart.Whenseatedinplace,thetoolreleasesthelegsallowingthemtoclamparoundthelowercontact.Thismethodallowsthepiecetobeinstalled withoutslidingorhavingtoapplyexcessive force.Thesametoolcanbeusedtoremovetheextension pieceifrequired. | ||
4.3FunctionThelowerspringsaredesignedtolimitthecoreplatedisplacement duringaseismicevent.ThelowerspringbearsagainsttheshroudatthecoresupportledgeandextendsabovetheH6AweldandbelowtheH6Bweld.WhentheH6Aweldremainsincontact,whetheritsfailedorothe+vise, thejointismodeledasahingeintheseismicmodelandiscapableofcarryingashearload.DuringasteamlineLOCA,thedploadontheshroudheadissufficient toopena360'hrough wallcrackattheH6Alocation. | |||
Inthisevent,thejointismodeledasarollerintheseismicmodelandisnotcapableofcarryingashearload.Intheeventoffullseparation atweldH6Athecontactextension limitsthepossibleshroudmovementand,togetherwiththecoreplatewedges,providearedundant loadpathforthehorizontal seismicloads.(Thecoresupportstructure isalsoheldinposition | |||
GENEB13- | GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1996bythecoresupportboltsandbythecoresupportalignerpins.)Withouttakingcreditforthecoresupportboltsoralignerpins,thelimitinglateraldesignloadontheextension istheentire63,800Ibmaximumhorizontal seismicload.Theanalysisinattachments 8.1and8.2showallloadsanddisplacements remainacceptable withtheextension piecesinstalled. | ||
5.DISPLACEMENT SUMMARYAlthoughallcoresupportdisplacements remainacceptable, bothmodifications described in3and4abovedoaffectthedisplacements andchangethevaluesreportedintheoriginalstressreport,GE-NE-B13-01739-04, Rev.0.Thedisplacement valuesreportedbelowsupersede thedisplacement valuesreportedintheoriginalstressreport.Theallowable permanent andtransient displacements aresummarized below.Theshroudrepairhardwaredesignspecification, 25A5583,providesthebasisfortheallowable displacements andsafetyfactors.TopGuidePermanent | |||
=2.1/SFTopGuideTransient | |||
=notspecified CoreSupportPermanent | |||
=0.75/SFCoreSupportTransient | |||
=1.68/SFNormal/UpsetSF=2.25Emergency SF=1.50FaultedSF=1.1255.1TopGuideTheTopGuidealwaysremainsincontactwiththeupperspringandthereisnopermanent displacement. | |||
Thelimitingcondition foreacheventisthe"allhinge"condition whichhasanequivalent displacement totheHlrollercase.Sincethereisonlyoneseismicevent,thedisplacement isthesamefortheUpset,Emergency andFaultedevents.Thecalculated maximumtransient designdisplacement is0.904inchesforeachevent.Althoughthe0.904inchisatransient displacement, italsosatisfies themostrestrictive allowable permanent displacement requirement foranUpseteventof0.93inches.5.2CoreSupportAfaultedeventwithseparation atweldH6Aistheonlycondition wheretheremaybepermanent displacement atthecoresupport.Forallothereventsthedisplacement resultsfromthespringcompression whichreturnstotheoriginalpositionwhentheloadstops.The"allhinge"case(equivalent tothe"Hlroller"case)isapplicable forUpsetandEmergency andFaultedevents. | |||
GENEB13-D1739- | GENEB13-D1739-31 RevisionDAugust19965.2.1Permanent Displacement Themaximumpermanent displacement isthedistancetheshroudmovesbeforecontactwithaspringmember.Themachineddistancebetweenthespringloadedshroudcontactsurfaceandtheuppercontactis0.15inches.ThelowercontactalsobearsagainstweldcrownatH68.Theweldcrownisestimated tobelessthan0.13high.Ifthedisplacement isdirectedmidwaybetweenthetwocontactslocated108'part, thedisplacement isincreased to0.48inches.(Attachment 8.2)Theallowable permanent displacement is0.67inches.5.2.2Transient Displacement Theboundingtransient displacement isacombination ofthemaximumpermanent displacement andthemaximumspringcompression. | ||
ForUpset,andEmergency conditions, thereisnopermanent displacement andthemaximumtransient displacement is0.256inches(Attachment 8.1,Table1).Theallowable Upsettransient displacement is0.75inches.Assumingtheworstcasescenarioforloaddirection andspringcharacteristics foraFaultedevent,themaximumspringcompression is0.368inches(Attachment 8.1,Table1).Themaximumtransient displacement becomes0.85incheswhenroundedtotwoplaces.Theallowable Faultedtransient displacement is1.49inches.6.DESIGNBASISThehardwareforbothmodifications isdesignedandfabricated tothesamedesignbasisastheoriginalshroudrepairhardware. | |||
Themodifiedstabilizer assemblyincludesthesamedesignfeaturesastheoriginalhardware. | |||
Allpartsarelockedinplaceorcapturedbymechanical devices.Thefabrication requirements forthetwoproposedmodifications willbeinaccordance withthepreviously approvedfabrication requirements fortheNMP-Icoreshroudstabilizers. | |||
Thereisnoweldingrequiredduringfabrication orinstallation. | |||
Relocating thelowerspringtotheoppositesideofthestabilizer assemblyisconsistent withthecoreshroudrepairdesigncriteriaanddesignbasis.Theadditional counterbores andlockingpinholesneededtoutilizetheexistingpartshavenoaffectonthestabilizer assemblyfunctionorstresses. | |||
Thehandlingandinstallation toolsarethesameasusedfortheoriginalinstallation. | |||
GENEB13-D1739-31 Revision0August19967.SAFETFCONSIDERATIONS Thisevaluation hasinvestigated modifications totheshroudrepairstabilizers atNineMilePoint1whichwillrestorethemtotheirintendeddesignfunction. | |||
Theplantlicensing baseshavebeenreviewed. | |||
Thisreviewdemonstrates thatthesemodifications canbeinstalled (1)withoutanincreaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentormalfunction previously evaluated, (2)withoutcreatingthepossibility ofanaccidentormalfunction ofanewordifferent kindfromanypreviously evaluated, (3)andwithoutreducingthemarginofsafetyinthebasesofaTechnical Specification. | |||
TheGECoreShroudRepairDesignSafetyEvaluation, GE-NE-B13-01739-05, Rev.1hasbeenreviewedforpossibleadverseconsequences ofmovingthelowerspringtotheoppositesideofthestabilizer assembly. | |||
Thecoreplatedisplacements reportedinB.2.1areupdatedtoincludetheaffectsofthelowerspringspacing.The0.75inchtemporary displacement duringafaultedeventremainswellthe1.49inchallowable forthisevent.GESafetyEvaluation, GE-NE-B13-01739-5.1, Rev.0,entitled, "Modification toGEShroudRepairDesign",wascompleted toevaluatethetwoproposedmodifications inaccordance with10CFR50.59. | |||
Thesafetyevaluation concluded thattheproposedmodifications donotinvolveanyunreviewed safetyquestions. | |||
8.ATI'ACHMENTS 8.1GENEB13-01739-03, Supplement 1,NineMilePoint1SeismicAnalysis, CoreShroudRepairModification 8.2GENEB13-01739-04, Supplement 4,NineMilePoint1ShroudRepairHardwareStressAnalysis8.3Drawing107E5679Rev.7andPartsList107E5679Rev.5,ReactorModification 8.4Specification 25A5585Rev.4,Stabilizer Installation}} |
Revision as of 21:54, 29 June 2018
ML17059B241 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Nine Mile Point |
Issue date: | 08/13/1996 |
From: | GLEASON T E, RANGANATH S, SCHRAG M R GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML17059B240 | List: |
References | |
GENE-B13-01739, GENE-B13-01739-31-R0, GENE-B13-1739, GENE-B13-1739-31-R, NUDOCS 9608210135 | |
Download: ML17059B241 (30) | |
Text
ENCLOSMILEPOINT1CORESHROUDREPAIRMODIFICATION SARYREPORT96082iOi35 9608i4'DRADQCK,05000220,.
P~',PDR
GENuclearfnerqyGENEB13-P1739-31 Revision0August1996NineMilePoint1CoreShroudRepairModification SummaryReportPreparedfor.NiagaraMohawkPowerCorporation Preparedby:GENuclearEnergyReactorModification Services175CurtnerAvenue,N/C571SanJose,California 95125
GENuclearE'nergyGENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1996NineMilePoint1CoreShroudRepairModification SummaryReportPreparedby:&-/Z-K,TE.Gleason,Principal EngineerReactorModification ServicesReviewedby:Approvedby:N.R.Schrag,IncipalEngineerReactorModification Services<l~jg,S.Ranganath, Engineering FellowGENuclearEnergy
GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1996REVISIONSTATUSSHEETRevisionApprovalS.Ranganath DateInitialIssueDescription
GENEB13-P1739-31 Revision0August1998IMPORTANT NOTICEREGARDING CONTENTSOFTHISREPORTPleaseReadCarefully ThisreportwaspreparedbyGeneralElectricsolelyfortheuseoftheNiagaraMohawkPowerCorporation.
Theinformation contained inthisreportisbelievedbyGeneralElectrictobeanaccurateandtruerepresentation ofthefactsknown,obtainedorprovidedtoGeneralElectricatthetimethisreportwasprepared.
Theonlyundertakings oftheGeneralElectricCompanyrespecting information inthisdocumentarecontained inthecontractgoverning thiswork,andnothingcontained inthisdocumentshallbeconstrued aschangingsaidcontract.
Theuseofthisinformation exceptasdefinedbysaidcontract, orforanypurposeotherthanthatforwhichitisintended, isnotauthorized; andwithrespecttoanysuchunauthorized use,neitherGeneralElectricCompanynoranyofthecontributors tothisdocumentmakesanyrepresentation orwarranty(expressorimplied)astothecompleteness, accuracyofusefulness oftheinformation contained inthisdocumentorthatsuchuseofsuchinformation maynotinfringeprivately ownedrights;nordotheyassumeanyresponsibility forliability ofdamageofanykindwhichmayresultfromsuchuseofsuchinformation.
GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1996CONTENTSl.INTRODUCTION 2.SUMMARYANDCONCLUSIONS 3.TIERODREPLACEMENT MODIFICATION 4.H6ACONTACTEXTENSION 5.DISPLACEMENT SUMMARY6.DESIGNBASIS7.SAFETYCONSIDERATIONS 8.ATTACHMENTS
GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1998l.INTRODUCTION Acoreshroudrepairmodification wasinstalled inNineMilePoint1NuclearPowerPlanttoprovideanalternate loadpathfortheType304stainless steelcircumferential welds,HlthroughH7.Thecoreshroudrepairensuresthestructural integrity ofthecoreshroudbyreplacing thefunctionofweldsHlthroughH7with4stabilizer assemblies, andfourcoreplatewedges.Inthecourseofthepost-installation inspection oftheshroudrepair,threedeviations wereidentified, evaluated andwerefoundacceptable forcontinued plantoperation throughthenextcycle.Afteradditional reviewandevaluation, twoadditional modifications areproposedtoprovidethelongtermcorrective actions.1.1Modification 1:270'ieRodReplacement Thelowerspringofonestabilizer assemblybearsontheblendradiusofthe270'ecirculation nozzle.Theproposedmodification istoreplacethetierodandspringassemblywithonehavingthespringontheoppositesideofthetierod.Thisproposedmodification relocates thespringtobearontheRPVasintended.
1.2ThelowerspringcontactwiththeshrouddoesnotextendbeyondweldH6Aatanyofthefourlocations.
Asaresult,ifweldH6Aisfullycracked,andifthedesigncondition ofasteamlineLOCAplusseismiceventweretooccur,theshroudwouldnotbelaterally constrained totheextentintendedbydesign.Theproposedmodification addsanextension piecetoextendthespringcontactbeyondweldH6Aandrestorethisfeaturetoitsintendedfunction.
Theextendedcontactandthecoreplatewedgesalsoprovidearedundant loadpathbetweenthecoreplateandthelowerspringaswasintendedintheoriginaldesign.Thismodification appliestothe90',166'nd350'tabilizer assemblies.
Thedeviation iscorrected forthereplacement assemblyat270'.2.SUMMARYANDCONCLUSIONS 2.1270'ieRodReplacement Theshroudrepairstabilizer assemblies aredesignedwiththelowerspringlocatedonthesideofthetierod.Theproposedmodification istoreplacethetierodandspringassemblywithonehavingthespringontheoppositeside.Themodification movesthespringsufficiently suchthatitwillbearontheRPVasintended.
Themodification utilizes
GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1998existinghardwarewhichwasbuiltasasparealongwiththeotherstabilizer assemblies.
Onlyminorreworkisrequiredtorelocatethelowerspringandthereworkhasnoaffectonthehardwarefunction.
Themodification doesnotrequireadditional penetrations throughtheshroudsupportconeoranyadditional EDMwork.Themodification usesthesamelowersupportandupperspringassemblies andthereisnochangetotheactualtierodlocation.
Additional analysishasbeendonetoaddressthedesignwherethelowerspringsarenolongerlocated90'part.Thenon-uniform lowerspringspacingaffectsthenetspringcharacteristic whenthehorizontal seismicloadisdirectedbetweentwosprings.Theanalysisshowtheloadsanddisplacements remainacceptable forallconditions.
2.2H6AContactExtension ThelowerspringcontactswiththeshrouddonotextendabovetheH6Aweldaswasintended.
ThedesignfunctioncanberestoredbyaddingaUshapedextension piecetoextendbeyondweldH6A.Theextension piecefitsovertheexistinglowercontactandiscapturedonthelowerextension inalldirections.
Theextension isdesignedtoprovideapositivespringclampingforceagainstthesidesofthelowercontact.Thespringforceisnotrequiredtocapturethepartbutissufficient topreventanyfreemovementorvibrations.
Withthisarrangement, theaddedextension pieceiscapturedinalldirections andisheldsecurebythespringloadedclampingforce.2.3Conclusions Themodifications totheshroudrepairstabilizers atNineMilePoint1willrestorethemtotheirintendeddesignfunction.
Theplantlicensing baseshavebeenreviewed.
Thisreviewdemonstrates thatthesemodifications canbeinstalled (1)withoutanincreaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentormalfunction previously evaluated, (2)withoutcreatingthepossibility ofanaccidentormalfunction ofanewordifferent kindfromanypreviously evaluated, (3)andwithoutreducingthemarginofsafetyinthebasesofaTechnical Specification.
3.TIERODREPLACEMENT MODIFICATION
3.1Background
Thelowerwedgeonthe270'ierodwasfoundtobearagainsttheblendradiusonarecirculation nozzleratherthanonthe'vessel wall.Thissituation isdocumented perFDDREAl-0032andfurtherevaluated inGElKB13-01739-25.
Thatreportaddressed concernsaboutthecontactareaandthestability ofthecontactontheinclinedsurfaceofthenozzleblendradius.
GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1998Thelowerwedgecanberelocated toapositionwithmorecompleted contact(Figure3.1)onthevesselbymovingthelowerspringtotheoppositesideofthestabilizer assembly.
Byrelocating thelowerspring,theconcernsaboutcontactstability andcontactareaareresolvedandthestabilizer assemblymaintains itsintendedfunctional requirements.
IIIIIIIIIIII1i\'IiNozzleBoundary[2'ldLncaIion//I/Nc~LocnlionII.2ln.FIGURE3.13.2.Description NiagaraMohawkPowerCorporation purchased asparetierodassemblyandthisassemblyisintendedtobemodifiedtothealternate configuration.
Applicable designandassemblydrawingsarerevisedtoincludethenewpartsandgroupswhichdefinethealternate configuration.
Alladditional partsandassemblies aredesignedandfabricated tothesamedesignbasisastheoriginalshroudrepairhardware.
Movingthelowerspringtotheoppositesideofthestabilizer assemblyisaccomplished bythestepslistedbelow.a.Removethelowerspringfromtheexistingspareassemblyandthelowercontactfromtheexistinglowerspring.Thestakedlockingpinswillhavetoberemovedtoaccomplish this.Newlockingpinswillhavetobeinstalled inslightlydifferent locations, butthiswillnotaffectthefunctionofthepart.
GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1998b.Modifythelowerspringbyaddingcounterbores totheoppositesideoftheboltholes.Havingcounterbores onbothsidesdoesnotaffectthefunctionofthepart.c.ModifytheC-springbyextending the1.125diameterholethroughthepart.d.Fabricate anewlowercontactwiththeshroudsidedsurfacetaperedtofitontheoppositesideofthestabilizer assembly.
ThenewlowercontactisalsodesignedtoextendbeyondtheH6Aweldtoavoidinstallation ofthecontactextension piece.e.Re-assemble thetierodassembly.
f.Sincethelowerwedgeisatanewposition, newannulusmeasurements arerequiredandthenewlowerwedgemachinedtofitperthemodification drawing.g.Allchangeswillberecordedonamodification drawingrevision.
Nochangesarerequiredfortheuppersupport,theupperspringandthemidsupport.3.3.FunctionThelowerspringisdesignedtorestrictthecoreplatedisplacement duringaseismicevent.Thestabilizer assemblyisdesignedforasinglelowerspringtocarrytheentirehorizontal seismicloadatthecoresupport.However,thedirection oftheloadmaybesuchthatmorethanonespringsharestheload.Thelimitingspringdeflection andspringloadsoccurwhenonlyoneofthelowerspringsreactstotheentirehorizontal load.Relocating thespringhasnoaffectonthemaximumspringloadormaximumspringdeflection.
Relocating thelowerspringdoeschangethespacingbetweenadjacentspringsandthespacingdoesaffectthenetreactionwhentwospringssharethelateralload.ThelowerspringcontactwiththeRPVischangedbyabout4'ymovingittotheoppositesideoftheuerod.The4'hangefromtheas-installed locationresultsinamaximum108'pacing betweenadjacentlowersprings.Theminimumspacingbetweenadjacentlowerspringsis76'.Whenthefourlowerspringsare90'part,theequivalent springconstantisthesameforalldirections oftheappliedload.Theequivalent springconstantisthetotalloadappliedbythelowerspringsdividedbythedisplacement inthedirection oftheappliedload.Becauseofthenon-uniform springspacing,thevariation inequivalent springconstantis 1
GENEB13-D1739-31 RevisionDAugust1998from+24%to-31%.Anincreaseintheequivalent springconstanttendstoincreasethetotalreactionloadanddecreasethetotaldisplacement.
Althoughthetotalreactionloadincreases, theloadissharedbytwospringsandtheloadoneitherspringisboundedbythecasewhereonespringcarriestheentireload.Adecreaseinequivalent springconstantresultsinalargerdisplacement inthedirection oftheload.Additional analysisinAttachments 8.1and8.2showallloadsanddisplacements remainacceptable forthismodification.
4.H6ACONTACTEXTENSION 4.1.Background ThelowercontactsdonotextendabovetheH6Aweldaswasintendedtosatisfytheintendeddesignrequirements.
TheReactorModification Drawing,107E5679Revision6,showstheas-installed positionofthelowercontactsandtheH6Aweld.Thesituation resultedfrominsufficient margininthelowercontactdesigntoaccountfortheuncertainties intheas-builtgeometryoftheshroudsupportcone.Thisabovedeviation fromtheintendeddesigncondition isdescribed andevaluated inFDDREAl-0031.
Theevaluation showedthecoreplateboltsaresufficient tomaintainthecoreplatealignment withoutthelowercontactextending aboveweldH6A.Theevaluation considered theboltclampingloadandtheelasticproperties oftheboltstoshowallowable coreplatedisplacement wasnotexceeded.'dding theextension pieceprovidesadditional designmarginandassurance thatthecoreplatealignment ismaintained.
4.2Description Thelowercontactsatazimuths90',166'nd350'remodifiedtoextendbeyondtheH6AweldbyaddingaUshapedextension pieceshowninFigure4.1.Theextension piecefitsovertheexistinglowercontactwiththelegsoftheUextending aroundthesidesoftheexistinglowercontact.Thestepsattheendsofthelegsfitunderthelowercontacttopreventaxialmovement.
Atangatthetopextension fitsinthegapbetweenthelowercontactandthelowerspringtorestrictthehorizontal movement.
Theaddedextension pieceiscapturedinalldirections ontheexistinglowercontact.Thelegsoftheextension provideapositivespringclampingforce(40lbto50lb)againstthesidesofthelowercontact.Thisforceissufficient topreventanyfreemovementorvibrations.
Withthisarrangement, theaddedextension pieceiscapturedinalldirections andisheldsecurebythespringloadedclampingforce.
GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1996TANGLLAi4IPLEGSTEPSFIGURE4.1Theaddedextension piecesareinstalled withaspecialtoolforhandlingandtokeepthelegssprungapart.Whenseatedinplace,thetoolreleasesthelegsallowingthemtoclamparoundthelowercontact.Thismethodallowsthepiecetobeinstalled withoutslidingorhavingtoapplyexcessive force.Thesametoolcanbeusedtoremovetheextension pieceifrequired.
4.3FunctionThelowerspringsaredesignedtolimitthecoreplatedisplacement duringaseismicevent.ThelowerspringbearsagainsttheshroudatthecoresupportledgeandextendsabovetheH6AweldandbelowtheH6Bweld.WhentheH6Aweldremainsincontact,whetheritsfailedorothe+vise, thejointismodeledasahingeintheseismicmodelandiscapableofcarryingashearload.DuringasteamlineLOCA,thedploadontheshroudheadissufficient toopena360'hrough wallcrackattheH6Alocation.
Inthisevent,thejointismodeledasarollerintheseismicmodelandisnotcapableofcarryingashearload.Intheeventoffullseparation atweldH6Athecontactextension limitsthepossibleshroudmovementand,togetherwiththecoreplatewedges,providearedundant loadpathforthehorizontal seismicloads.(Thecoresupportstructure isalsoheldinposition
GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1996bythecoresupportboltsandbythecoresupportalignerpins.)Withouttakingcreditforthecoresupportboltsoralignerpins,thelimitinglateraldesignloadontheextension istheentire63,800Ibmaximumhorizontal seismicload.Theanalysisinattachments 8.1and8.2showallloadsanddisplacements remainacceptable withtheextension piecesinstalled.
5.DISPLACEMENT SUMMARYAlthoughallcoresupportdisplacements remainacceptable, bothmodifications described in3and4abovedoaffectthedisplacements andchangethevaluesreportedintheoriginalstressreport,GE-NE-B13-01739-04, Rev.0.Thedisplacement valuesreportedbelowsupersede thedisplacement valuesreportedintheoriginalstressreport.Theallowable permanent andtransient displacements aresummarized below.Theshroudrepairhardwaredesignspecification, 25A5583,providesthebasisfortheallowable displacements andsafetyfactors.TopGuidePermanent
=2.1/SFTopGuideTransient
=notspecified CoreSupportPermanent
=0.75/SFCoreSupportTransient
=1.68/SFNormal/UpsetSF=2.25Emergency SF=1.50FaultedSF=1.1255.1TopGuideTheTopGuidealwaysremainsincontactwiththeupperspringandthereisnopermanent displacement.
Thelimitingcondition foreacheventisthe"allhinge"condition whichhasanequivalent displacement totheHlrollercase.Sincethereisonlyoneseismicevent,thedisplacement isthesamefortheUpset,Emergency andFaultedevents.Thecalculated maximumtransient designdisplacement is0.904inchesforeachevent.Althoughthe0.904inchisatransient displacement, italsosatisfies themostrestrictive allowable permanent displacement requirement foranUpseteventof0.93inches.5.2CoreSupportAfaultedeventwithseparation atweldH6Aistheonlycondition wheretheremaybepermanent displacement atthecoresupport.Forallothereventsthedisplacement resultsfromthespringcompression whichreturnstotheoriginalpositionwhentheloadstops.The"allhinge"case(equivalent tothe"Hlroller"case)isapplicable forUpsetandEmergency andFaultedevents.
GENEB13-D1739-31 RevisionDAugust19965.2.1Permanent Displacement Themaximumpermanent displacement isthedistancetheshroudmovesbeforecontactwithaspringmember.Themachineddistancebetweenthespringloadedshroudcontactsurfaceandtheuppercontactis0.15inches.ThelowercontactalsobearsagainstweldcrownatH68.Theweldcrownisestimated tobelessthan0.13high.Ifthedisplacement isdirectedmidwaybetweenthetwocontactslocated108'part, thedisplacement isincreased to0.48inches.(Attachment 8.2)Theallowable permanent displacement is0.67inches.5.2.2Transient Displacement Theboundingtransient displacement isacombination ofthemaximumpermanent displacement andthemaximumspringcompression.
ForUpset,andEmergency conditions, thereisnopermanent displacement andthemaximumtransient displacement is0.256inches(Attachment 8.1,Table1).Theallowable Upsettransient displacement is0.75inches.Assumingtheworstcasescenarioforloaddirection andspringcharacteristics foraFaultedevent,themaximumspringcompression is0.368inches(Attachment 8.1,Table1).Themaximumtransient displacement becomes0.85incheswhenroundedtotwoplaces.Theallowable Faultedtransient displacement is1.49inches.6.DESIGNBASISThehardwareforbothmodifications isdesignedandfabricated tothesamedesignbasisastheoriginalshroudrepairhardware.
Themodifiedstabilizer assemblyincludesthesamedesignfeaturesastheoriginalhardware.
Allpartsarelockedinplaceorcapturedbymechanical devices.Thefabrication requirements forthetwoproposedmodifications willbeinaccordance withthepreviously approvedfabrication requirements fortheNMP-Icoreshroudstabilizers.
Thereisnoweldingrequiredduringfabrication orinstallation.
Relocating thelowerspringtotheoppositesideofthestabilizer assemblyisconsistent withthecoreshroudrepairdesigncriteriaanddesignbasis.Theadditional counterbores andlockingpinholesneededtoutilizetheexistingpartshavenoaffectonthestabilizer assemblyfunctionorstresses.
Thehandlingandinstallation toolsarethesameasusedfortheoriginalinstallation.
GENEB13-D1739-31 Revision0August19967.SAFETFCONSIDERATIONS Thisevaluation hasinvestigated modifications totheshroudrepairstabilizers atNineMilePoint1whichwillrestorethemtotheirintendeddesignfunction.
Theplantlicensing baseshavebeenreviewed.
Thisreviewdemonstrates thatthesemodifications canbeinstalled (1)withoutanincreaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentormalfunction previously evaluated, (2)withoutcreatingthepossibility ofanaccidentormalfunction ofanewordifferent kindfromanypreviously evaluated, (3)andwithoutreducingthemarginofsafetyinthebasesofaTechnical Specification.
TheGECoreShroudRepairDesignSafetyEvaluation, GE-NE-B13-01739-05, Rev.1hasbeenreviewedforpossibleadverseconsequences ofmovingthelowerspringtotheoppositesideofthestabilizer assembly.
Thecoreplatedisplacements reportedinB.2.1areupdatedtoincludetheaffectsofthelowerspringspacing.The0.75inchtemporary displacement duringafaultedeventremainswellthe1.49inchallowable forthisevent.GESafetyEvaluation, GE-NE-B13-01739-5.1, Rev.0,entitled, "Modification toGEShroudRepairDesign",wascompleted toevaluatethetwoproposedmodifications inaccordance with10CFR50.59.
Thesafetyevaluation concluded thattheproposedmodifications donotinvolveanyunreviewed safetyquestions.
8.ATI'ACHMENTS 8.1GENEB13-01739-03, Supplement 1,NineMilePoint1SeismicAnalysis, CoreShroudRepairModification 8.2GENEB13-01739-04, Supplement 4,NineMilePoint1ShroudRepairHardwareStressAnalysis8.3Drawing107E5679Rev.7andPartsList107E5679Rev.5,ReactorModification 8.4Specification 25A5585Rev.4,Stabilizer Installation