ML17059B241: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ENCLOSMILEPOINT1CORESHROUDREPAIRMODIFICATIONSARYREPORT96082iOi359608i4'DRADQCK,05000220,.P~',PDR  
{{#Wiki_filter:ENCLOSMILEPOINT1CORESHROUDREPAIRMODIFICATION SARYREPORT96082iOi35 9608i4'DRADQCK,05000220,.
P~',PDR  


GENuclearfnerqyGENEB13-P1739-31Revision0August1996NineMilePoint1CoreShroudRepairModificationSummaryReportPreparedfor.NiagaraMohawkPowerCorporationPreparedby:GENuclearEnergyReactorModificationServices175CurtnerAvenue,N/C571SanJose,California95125
GENuclearfnerqyGENEB13-P1739-31 Revision0August1996NineMilePoint1CoreShroudRepairModification SummaryReportPreparedfor.NiagaraMohawkPowerCorporation Preparedby:GENuclearEnergyReactorModification Services175CurtnerAvenue,N/C571SanJose,California 95125


GENuclearE'nergyGENEB13-01739-31Revision0August1996NineMilePoint1CoreShroudRepairModificationSummaryReportPreparedby:&-/Z-K,TE.Gleason,PrincipalEngineerReactorModificationServicesReviewedby:Approvedby:N.R.Schrag,IncipalEngineerReactorModificationServices<l~jg,S.Ranganath,EngineeringFellowGENuclearEnergy
GENuclearE'nergyGENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1996NineMilePoint1CoreShroudRepairModification SummaryReportPreparedby:&-/Z-K,TE.Gleason,Principal EngineerReactorModification ServicesReviewedby:Approvedby:N.R.Schrag,IncipalEngineerReactorModification Services<l~jg,S.Ranganath, Engineering FellowGENuclearEnergy


GENEB13-01739-31Revision0August1996REVISIONSTATUSSHEETRevisionApprovalS.RanganathDateInitialIssueDescription
GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1996REVISIONSTATUSSHEETRevisionApprovalS.Ranganath DateInitialIssueDescription


GENEB13-P1739-31Revision0August1998IMPORTANTNOTICEREGARDINGCONTENTSOFTHISREPORTPleaseReadCarefullyThisreportwaspreparedbyGeneralElectricsolelyfortheuseoftheNiagaraMohawkPowerCorporation.TheinformationcontainedinthisreportisbelievedbyGeneralElectrictobeanaccurateandtruerepresentationofthefactsknown,obtainedorprovidedtoGeneralElectricatthetimethisreportwasprepared.TheonlyundertakingsoftheGeneralElectricCompanyrespectinginformationinthisdocumentarecontainedinthecontractgoverningthiswork,andnothingcontainedinthisdocumentshallbeconstruedaschangingsaidcontract.Theuseofthisinformationexceptasdefinedbysaidcontract,orforanypurposeotherthanthatforwhichitisintended,isnotauthorized;andwithrespecttoanysuchunauthorizeduse,neitherGeneralElectricCompanynoranyofthecontributorstothisdocumentmakesanyrepresentationorwarranty(expressorimplied)astothecompleteness,accuracyofusefulnessoftheinformationcontainedinthisdocumentorthatsuchuseofsuchinformationmaynotinfringeprivatelyownedrights;nordotheyassumeanyresponsibilityforliabilityofdamageofanykindwhichmayresultfromsuchuseofsuchinformation.  
GENEB13-P1739-31 Revision0August1998IMPORTANT NOTICEREGARDING CONTENTSOFTHISREPORTPleaseReadCarefully ThisreportwaspreparedbyGeneralElectricsolelyfortheuseoftheNiagaraMohawkPowerCorporation.
Theinformation contained inthisreportisbelievedbyGeneralElectrictobeanaccurateandtruerepresentation ofthefactsknown,obtainedorprovidedtoGeneralElectricatthetimethisreportwasprepared.
Theonlyundertakings oftheGeneralElectricCompanyrespecting information inthisdocumentarecontained inthecontractgoverning thiswork,andnothingcontained inthisdocumentshallbeconstrued aschangingsaidcontract.
Theuseofthisinformation exceptasdefinedbysaidcontract, orforanypurposeotherthanthatforwhichitisintended, isnotauthorized; andwithrespecttoanysuchunauthorized use,neitherGeneralElectricCompanynoranyofthecontributors tothisdocumentmakesanyrepresentation orwarranty(expressorimplied)astothecompleteness, accuracyofusefulness oftheinformation contained inthisdocumentorthatsuchuseofsuchinformation maynotinfringeprivately ownedrights;nordotheyassumeanyresponsibility forliability ofdamageofanykindwhichmayresultfromsuchuseofsuchinformation.  


GENEB13-01739-31Revision0August1996CONTENTSl.INTRODUCTION2.SUMMARYANDCONCLUSIONS3.TIERODREPLACEMENTMODIFICATION4.H6ACONTACTEXTENSION5.DISPLACEMENTSUMMARY6.DESIGNBASIS7.SAFETYCONSIDERATIONS8.ATTACHMENTS  
GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1996CONTENTSl.INTRODUCTION 2.SUMMARYANDCONCLUSIONS 3.TIERODREPLACEMENT MODIFICATION 4.H6ACONTACTEXTENSION 5.DISPLACEMENT SUMMARY6.DESIGNBASIS7.SAFETYCONSIDERATIONS 8.ATTACHMENTS  


GENEB13-01739-31Revision0August1998l.INTRODUCTIONAcoreshroudrepairmodificationwasinstalledinNineMilePoint1NuclearPowerPlanttoprovideanalternateloadpathfortheType304stainlesssteelcircumferentialwelds,HlthroughH7.ThecoreshroudrepairensuresthestructuralintegrityofthecoreshroudbyreplacingthefunctionofweldsHlthroughH7with4stabilizerassemblies,andfourcoreplatewedges.Inthecourseofthepost-installationinspectionoftheshroudrepair,threedeviationswereidentified,evaluatedandwerefoundacceptableforcontinuedplantoperationthroughthenextcycle.Afteradditionalreviewandevaluation,twoadditionalmodificationsareproposedtoprovidethelongtermcorrectiveactions.1.1Modification1:270'ieRodReplacementThelowerspringofonestabilizerassemblybearsontheblendradiusofthe270'ecirculationnozzle.Theproposedmodificationistoreplacethetierodandspringassemblywithonehavingthespringontheoppositesideofthetierod.ThisproposedmodificationrelocatesthespringtobearontheRPVasintended.1.2ThelowerspringcontactwiththeshrouddoesnotextendbeyondweldH6Aatanyofthefourlocations.Asaresult,ifweldH6Aisfullycracked,andifthedesignconditionofasteamlineLOCAplusseismiceventweretooccur,theshroudwouldnotbelaterallyconstrainedtotheextentintendedbydesign.TheproposedmodificationaddsanextensionpiecetoextendthespringcontactbeyondweldH6Aandrestorethisfeaturetoitsintendedfunction.Theextendedcontactandthecoreplatewedgesalsoprovidearedundantloadpathbetweenthecoreplateandthelowerspringaswasintendedintheoriginaldesign.Thismodificationappliestothe90',166'nd350'tabilizerassemblies.Thedeviationiscorrectedforthereplacementassemblyat270'.2.SUMMARYANDCONCLUSIONS2.1270'ieRodReplacementTheshroudrepairstabilizerassembliesaredesignedwiththelowerspringlocatedonthesideofthetierod.Theproposedmodificationistoreplacethetierodandspringassemblywithonehavingthespringontheoppositeside.ThemodificationmovesthespringsufficientlysuchthatitwillbearontheRPVasintended.Themodificationutilizes
GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1998l.INTRODUCTION Acoreshroudrepairmodification wasinstalled inNineMilePoint1NuclearPowerPlanttoprovideanalternate loadpathfortheType304stainless steelcircumferential welds,HlthroughH7.Thecoreshroudrepairensuresthestructural integrity ofthecoreshroudbyreplacing thefunctionofweldsHlthroughH7with4stabilizer assemblies, andfourcoreplatewedges.Inthecourseofthepost-installation inspection oftheshroudrepair,threedeviations wereidentified, evaluated andwerefoundacceptable forcontinued plantoperation throughthenextcycle.Afteradditional reviewandevaluation, twoadditional modifications areproposedtoprovidethelongtermcorrective actions.1.1Modification 1:270'ieRodReplacement Thelowerspringofonestabilizer assemblybearsontheblendradiusofthe270'ecirculation nozzle.Theproposedmodification istoreplacethetierodandspringassemblywithonehavingthespringontheoppositesideofthetierod.Thisproposedmodification relocates thespringtobearontheRPVasintended.
1.2ThelowerspringcontactwiththeshrouddoesnotextendbeyondweldH6Aatanyofthefourlocations.
Asaresult,ifweldH6Aisfullycracked,andifthedesigncondition ofasteamlineLOCAplusseismiceventweretooccur,theshroudwouldnotbelaterally constrained totheextentintendedbydesign.Theproposedmodification addsanextension piecetoextendthespringcontactbeyondweldH6Aandrestorethisfeaturetoitsintendedfunction.
Theextendedcontactandthecoreplatewedgesalsoprovidearedundant loadpathbetweenthecoreplateandthelowerspringaswasintendedintheoriginaldesign.Thismodification appliestothe90',166'nd350'tabilizer assemblies.
Thedeviation iscorrected forthereplacement assemblyat270'.2.SUMMARYANDCONCLUSIONS 2.1270'ieRodReplacement Theshroudrepairstabilizer assemblies aredesignedwiththelowerspringlocatedonthesideofthetierod.Theproposedmodification istoreplacethetierodandspringassemblywithonehavingthespringontheoppositeside.Themodification movesthespringsufficiently suchthatitwillbearontheRPVasintended.
Themodification utilizes


GENEB13-01739-31Revision0August1998existinghardwarewhichwasbuiltasasparealongwiththeotherstabilizerassemblies.Onlyminorreworkisrequiredtorelocatethelowerspringandthereworkhasnoaffectonthehardwarefunction.ThemodificationdoesnotrequireadditionalpenetrationsthroughtheshroudsupportconeoranyadditionalEDMwork.Themodificationusesthesamelowersupportandupperspringassembliesandthereisnochangetotheactualtierodlocation.Additionalanalysishasbeendonetoaddressthedesignwherethelowerspringsarenolongerlocated90'part.Thenon-uniformlowerspringspacingaffectsthenetspringcharacteristicwhenthehorizontalseismicloadisdirectedbetweentwosprings.Theanalysisshowtheloadsanddisplacementsremainacceptableforallconditions.2.2H6AContactExtensionThelowerspringcontactswiththeshrouddonotextendabovetheH6Aweldaswasintended.ThedesignfunctioncanberestoredbyaddingaUshapedextensionpiecetoextendbeyondweldH6A.Theextensionpiecefitsovertheexistinglowercontactandiscapturedonthelowerextensioninalldirections.Theextensionisdesignedtoprovideapositivespringclampingforceagainstthesidesofthelowercontact.Thespringforceisnotrequiredtocapturethepartbutissufficienttopreventanyfreemovementorvibrations.Withthisarrangement,theaddedextensionpieceiscapturedinalldirectionsandisheldsecurebythespringloadedclampingforce.2.3ConclusionsThemodificationstotheshroudrepairstabilizersatNineMilePoint1willrestorethemtotheirintendeddesignfunction.Theplantlicensingbaseshavebeenreviewed.Thisreviewdemonstratesthatthesemodificationscanbeinstalled(1)withoutanincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentormalfunctionpreviouslyevaluated,(2)withoutcreatingthepossibilityofanaccidentormalfunctionofanewordifferentkindfromanypreviouslyevaluated,(3)andwithoutreducingthemarginofsafetyinthebasesofaTechnicalSpecification.3.TIERODREPLACEMENTMODIFICATION3.1BackgroundThelowerwedgeonthe270'ierodwasfoundtobearagainsttheblendradiusonarecirculationnozzleratherthanonthe'vesselwall.ThissituationisdocumentedperFDDREAl-0032andfurtherevaluatedinGElKB13-01739-25.Thatreportaddressedconcernsaboutthecontactareaandthestabilityofthecontactontheinclinedsurfaceofthenozzleblendradius.
GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1998existinghardwarewhichwasbuiltasasparealongwiththeotherstabilizer assemblies.
Onlyminorreworkisrequiredtorelocatethelowerspringandthereworkhasnoaffectonthehardwarefunction.
Themodification doesnotrequireadditional penetrations throughtheshroudsupportconeoranyadditional EDMwork.Themodification usesthesamelowersupportandupperspringassemblies andthereisnochangetotheactualtierodlocation.
Additional analysishasbeendonetoaddressthedesignwherethelowerspringsarenolongerlocated90'part.Thenon-uniform lowerspringspacingaffectsthenetspringcharacteristic whenthehorizontal seismicloadisdirectedbetweentwosprings.Theanalysisshowtheloadsanddisplacements remainacceptable forallconditions.
2.2H6AContactExtension ThelowerspringcontactswiththeshrouddonotextendabovetheH6Aweldaswasintended.
ThedesignfunctioncanberestoredbyaddingaUshapedextension piecetoextendbeyondweldH6A.Theextension piecefitsovertheexistinglowercontactandiscapturedonthelowerextension inalldirections.
Theextension isdesignedtoprovideapositivespringclampingforceagainstthesidesofthelowercontact.Thespringforceisnotrequiredtocapturethepartbutissufficient topreventanyfreemovementorvibrations.
Withthisarrangement, theaddedextension pieceiscapturedinalldirections andisheldsecurebythespringloadedclampingforce.2.3Conclusions Themodifications totheshroudrepairstabilizers atNineMilePoint1willrestorethemtotheirintendeddesignfunction.
Theplantlicensing baseshavebeenreviewed.
Thisreviewdemonstrates thatthesemodifications canbeinstalled (1)withoutanincreaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentormalfunction previously evaluated, (2)withoutcreatingthepossibility ofanaccidentormalfunction ofanewordifferent kindfromanypreviously evaluated, (3)andwithoutreducingthemarginofsafetyinthebasesofaTechnical Specification.
3.TIERODREPLACEMENT MODIFICATION


GENEB13-01739-31Revision0August1998Thelowerwedgecanberelocatedtoapositionwithmorecompletedcontact(Figure3.1)onthevesselbymovingthelowerspringtotheoppositesideofthestabilizerassembly.Byrelocatingthelowerspring,theconcernsaboutcontactstabilityandcontactareaareresolvedandthestabilizerassemblymaintainsitsintendedfunctionalrequirements.IIIIIIIIIIII1i\'IiNozzleBoundary[2'ldLncaIion//I/Nc~LocnlionII.2ln.FIGURE3.13.2.DescriptionNiagaraMohawkPowerCorporationpurchasedasparetierodassemblyandthisassemblyisintendedtobemodifiedtothealternateconfiguration.Applicabledesignandassemblydrawingsarerevisedtoincludethenewpartsandgroupswhichdefinethealternateconfiguration.Alladditionalpartsandassembliesaredesignedandfabricatedtothesamedesignbasisastheoriginalshroudrepairhardware.Movingthelowerspringtotheoppositesideofthestabilizerassemblyisaccomplishedbythestepslistedbelow.a.Removethelowerspringfromtheexistingspareassemblyandthelowercontactfromtheexistinglowerspring.Thestakedlockingpinswillhavetoberemovedtoaccomplishthis.Newlockingpinswillhavetobeinstalledinslightlydifferentlocations,butthiswillnotaffectthefunctionofthepart.  
===3.1Background===
Thelowerwedgeonthe270'ierodwasfoundtobearagainsttheblendradiusonarecirculation nozzleratherthanonthe'vessel wall.Thissituation isdocumented perFDDREAl-0032andfurtherevaluated inGElKB13-01739-25.
Thatreportaddressed concernsaboutthecontactareaandthestability ofthecontactontheinclinedsurfaceofthenozzleblendradius.  


GENEB13-01739-31Revision0August1998b.Modifythelowerspringbyaddingcounterborestotheoppositesideoftheboltholes.Havingcounterboresonbothsidesdoesnotaffectthefunctionofthepart.c.ModifytheC-springbyextendingthe1.125diameterholethroughthepart.d.Fabricateanewlowercontactwiththeshroudsidedsurfacetaperedtofitontheoppositesideofthestabilizerassembly.ThenewlowercontactisalsodesignedtoextendbeyondtheH6Aweldtoavoidinstallationofthecontactextensionpiece.e.Re-assemblethetierodassembly.f.Sincethelowerwedgeisatanewposition,newannulusmeasurementsarerequiredandthenewlowerwedgemachinedtofitperthemodificationdrawing.g.Allchangeswillberecordedonamodificationdrawingrevision.Nochangesarerequiredfortheuppersupport,theupperspringandthemidsupport.3.3.FunctionThelowerspringisdesignedtorestrictthecoreplatedisplacementduringaseismicevent.Thestabilizerassemblyisdesignedforasinglelowerspringtocarrytheentirehorizontalseismicloadatthecoresupport.However,thedirectionoftheloadmaybesuchthatmorethanonespringsharestheload.Thelimitingspringdeflectionandspringloadsoccurwhenonlyoneofthelowerspringsreactstotheentirehorizontalload.Relocatingthespringhasnoaffectonthemaximumspringloadormaximumspringdeflection.Relocatingthelowerspringdoeschangethespacingbetweenadjacentspringsandthespacingdoesaffectthenetreactionwhentwospringssharethelateralload.ThelowerspringcontactwiththeRPVischangedbyabout4'ymovingittotheoppositesideoftheuerod.The4'hangefromtheas-installedlocationresultsinamaximum108'pacingbetweenadjacentlowersprings.Theminimumspacingbetweenadjacentlowerspringsis76'.Whenthefourlowerspringsare90'part,theequivalentspringconstantisthesameforalldirectionsoftheappliedload.Theequivalentspringconstantisthetotalloadappliedbythelowerspringsdividedbythedisplacementinthedirectionoftheappliedload.Becauseofthenon-uniformspringspacing,thevariationinequivalentspringconstantis 1
GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1998Thelowerwedgecanberelocated toapositionwithmorecompleted contact(Figure3.1)onthevesselbymovingthelowerspringtotheoppositesideofthestabilizer assembly.
GENEB13-D1739-31RevisionDAugust1998from+24%to-31%.Anincreaseintheequivalentspringconstanttendstoincreasethetotalreactionloadanddecreasethetotaldisplacement.Althoughthetotalreactionloadincreases,theloadissharedbytwospringsandtheloadoneitherspringisboundedbythecasewhereonespringcarriestheentireload.Adecreaseinequivalentspringconstantresultsinalargerdisplacementinthedirectionoftheload.AdditionalanalysisinAttachments8.1and8.2showallloadsanddisplacementsremainacceptableforthismodification.4.H6ACONTACTEXTENSION4.1.BackgroundThelowercontactsdonotextendabovetheH6Aweldaswasintendedtosatisfytheintendeddesignrequirements.TheReactorModificationDrawing,107E5679Revision6,showstheas-installedpositionofthelowercontactsandtheH6Aweld.Thesituationresultedfrominsufficientmargininthelowercontactdesigntoaccountfortheuncertaintiesintheas-builtgeometryoftheshroudsupportcone.ThisabovedeviationfromtheintendeddesignconditionisdescribedandevaluatedinFDDREAl-0031.TheevaluationshowedthecoreplateboltsaresufficienttomaintainthecoreplatealignmentwithoutthelowercontactextendingaboveweldH6A.Theevaluationconsideredtheboltclampingloadandtheelasticpropertiesoftheboltstoshowallowablecoreplatedisplacementwasnotexceeded.'ddingtheextensionpieceprovidesadditionaldesignmarginandassurancethatthecoreplatealignmentismaintained.4.2DescriptionThelowercontactsatazimuths90',166'nd350'remodifiedtoextendbeyondtheH6AweldbyaddingaUshapedextensionpieceshowninFigure4.1.TheextensionpiecefitsovertheexistinglowercontactwiththelegsoftheUextendingaroundthesidesoftheexistinglowercontact.Thestepsattheendsofthelegsfitunderthelowercontacttopreventaxialmovement.Atangatthetopextensionfitsinthegapbetweenthelowercontactandthelowerspringtorestrictthehorizontalmovement.Theaddedextensionpieceiscapturedinalldirectionsontheexistinglowercontact.Thelegsoftheextensionprovideapositivespringclampingforce(40lbto50lb)againstthesidesofthelowercontact.Thisforceissufficienttopreventanyfreemovementorvibrations.Withthisarrangement,theaddedextensionpieceiscapturedinalldirectionsandisheldsecurebythespringloadedclampingforce.  
Byrelocating thelowerspring,theconcernsaboutcontactstability andcontactareaareresolvedandthestabilizer assemblymaintains itsintendedfunctional requirements.
IIIIIIIIIIII1i\'IiNozzleBoundary[2'ldLncaIion//I/Nc~LocnlionII.2ln.FIGURE3.13.2.Description NiagaraMohawkPowerCorporation purchased asparetierodassemblyandthisassemblyisintendedtobemodifiedtothealternate configuration.
Applicable designandassemblydrawingsarerevisedtoincludethenewpartsandgroupswhichdefinethealternate configuration.
Alladditional partsandassemblies aredesignedandfabricated tothesamedesignbasisastheoriginalshroudrepairhardware.
Movingthelowerspringtotheoppositesideofthestabilizer assemblyisaccomplished bythestepslistedbelow.a.Removethelowerspringfromtheexistingspareassemblyandthelowercontactfromtheexistinglowerspring.Thestakedlockingpinswillhavetoberemovedtoaccomplish this.Newlockingpinswillhavetobeinstalled inslightlydifferent locations, butthiswillnotaffectthefunctionofthepart.  


GENEB13-01739-31Revision0August1996TANGLLAi4IPLEGSTEPSFIGURE4.1Theaddedextensionpiecesareinstalledwithaspecialtoolforhandlingandtokeepthelegssprungapart.Whenseatedinplace,thetoolreleasesthelegsallowingthemtoclamparoundthelowercontact.Thismethodallowsthepiecetobeinstalledwithoutslidingorhavingtoapplyexcessiveforce.Thesametoolcanbeusedtoremovetheextensionpieceifrequired.4.3FunctionThelowerspringsaredesignedtolimitthecoreplatedisplacementduringaseismicevent.ThelowerspringbearsagainsttheshroudatthecoresupportledgeandextendsabovetheH6AweldandbelowtheH6Bweld.WhentheH6Aweldremainsincontact,whetheritsfailedorothe+vise,thejointismodeledasahingeintheseismicmodelandiscapableofcarryingashearload.DuringasteamlineLOCA,thedploadontheshroudheadissufficienttoopena360'hroughwallcrackattheH6Alocation.Inthisevent,thejointismodeledasarollerintheseismicmodelandisnotcapableofcarryingashearload.IntheeventoffullseparationatweldH6Athecontactextensionlimitsthepossibleshroudmovementand,togetherwiththecoreplatewedges,providearedundantloadpathforthehorizontalseismicloads.(Thecoresupportstructureisalsoheldinposition
GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1998b.Modifythelowerspringbyaddingcounterbores totheoppositesideoftheboltholes.Havingcounterbores onbothsidesdoesnotaffectthefunctionofthepart.c.ModifytheC-springbyextending the1.125diameterholethroughthepart.d.Fabricate anewlowercontactwiththeshroudsidedsurfacetaperedtofitontheoppositesideofthestabilizer assembly.
ThenewlowercontactisalsodesignedtoextendbeyondtheH6Aweldtoavoidinstallation ofthecontactextension piece.e.Re-assemble thetierodassembly.
f.Sincethelowerwedgeisatanewposition, newannulusmeasurements arerequiredandthenewlowerwedgemachinedtofitperthemodification drawing.g.Allchangeswillberecordedonamodification drawingrevision.
Nochangesarerequiredfortheuppersupport,theupperspringandthemidsupport.3.3.FunctionThelowerspringisdesignedtorestrictthecoreplatedisplacement duringaseismicevent.Thestabilizer assemblyisdesignedforasinglelowerspringtocarrytheentirehorizontal seismicloadatthecoresupport.However,thedirection oftheloadmaybesuchthatmorethanonespringsharestheload.Thelimitingspringdeflection andspringloadsoccurwhenonlyoneofthelowerspringsreactstotheentirehorizontal load.Relocating thespringhasnoaffectonthemaximumspringloadormaximumspringdeflection.
Relocating thelowerspringdoeschangethespacingbetweenadjacentspringsandthespacingdoesaffectthenetreactionwhentwospringssharethelateralload.ThelowerspringcontactwiththeRPVischangedbyabout4'ymovingittotheoppositesideoftheuerod.The4'hangefromtheas-installed locationresultsinamaximum108'pacing betweenadjacentlowersprings.Theminimumspacingbetweenadjacentlowerspringsis76'.Whenthefourlowerspringsare90'part,theequivalent springconstantisthesameforalldirections oftheappliedload.Theequivalent springconstantisthetotalloadappliedbythelowerspringsdividedbythedisplacement inthedirection oftheappliedload.Becauseofthenon-uniform springspacing,thevariation inequivalent springconstantis 1
GENEB13-D1739-31 RevisionDAugust1998from+24%to-31%.Anincreaseintheequivalent springconstanttendstoincreasethetotalreactionloadanddecreasethetotaldisplacement.
Althoughthetotalreactionloadincreases, theloadissharedbytwospringsandtheloadoneitherspringisboundedbythecasewhereonespringcarriestheentireload.Adecreaseinequivalent springconstantresultsinalargerdisplacement inthedirection oftheload.Additional analysisinAttachments 8.1and8.2showallloadsanddisplacements remainacceptable forthismodification.
4.H6ACONTACTEXTENSION 4.1.Background ThelowercontactsdonotextendabovetheH6Aweldaswasintendedtosatisfytheintendeddesignrequirements.
TheReactorModification Drawing,107E5679Revision6,showstheas-installed positionofthelowercontactsandtheH6Aweld.Thesituation resultedfrominsufficient margininthelowercontactdesigntoaccountfortheuncertainties intheas-builtgeometryoftheshroudsupportcone.Thisabovedeviation fromtheintendeddesigncondition isdescribed andevaluated inFDDREAl-0031.
Theevaluation showedthecoreplateboltsaresufficient tomaintainthecoreplatealignment withoutthelowercontactextending aboveweldH6A.Theevaluation considered theboltclampingloadandtheelasticproperties oftheboltstoshowallowable coreplatedisplacement wasnotexceeded.'dding theextension pieceprovidesadditional designmarginandassurance thatthecoreplatealignment ismaintained.
4.2Description Thelowercontactsatazimuths90',166'nd350'remodifiedtoextendbeyondtheH6AweldbyaddingaUshapedextension pieceshowninFigure4.1.Theextension piecefitsovertheexistinglowercontactwiththelegsoftheUextending aroundthesidesoftheexistinglowercontact.Thestepsattheendsofthelegsfitunderthelowercontacttopreventaxialmovement.
Atangatthetopextension fitsinthegapbetweenthelowercontactandthelowerspringtorestrictthehorizontal movement.
Theaddedextension pieceiscapturedinalldirections ontheexistinglowercontact.Thelegsoftheextension provideapositivespringclampingforce(40lbto50lb)againstthesidesofthelowercontact.Thisforceissufficient topreventanyfreemovementorvibrations.
Withthisarrangement, theaddedextension pieceiscapturedinalldirections andisheldsecurebythespringloadedclampingforce.  


GENEB13-01739-31Revision0August1996bythecoresupportboltsandbythecoresupportalignerpins.)Withouttakingcreditforthecoresupportboltsoralignerpins,thelimitinglateraldesignloadontheextensionistheentire63,800Ibmaximumhorizontalseismicload.Theanalysisinattachments8.1and8.2showallloadsanddisplacementsremainacceptablewiththeextensionpiecesinstalled.5.DISPLACEMENTSUMMARYAlthoughallcoresupportdisplacementsremainacceptable,bothmodificationsdescribedin3and4abovedoaffectthedisplacementsandchangethevaluesreportedintheoriginalstressreport,GE-NE-B13-01739-04,Rev.0.Thedisplacementvaluesreportedbelowsupersedethedisplacementvaluesreportedintheoriginalstressreport.Theallowablepermanentandtransientdisplacementsaresummarizedbelow.Theshroudrepairhardwaredesignspecification,25A5583,providesthebasisfortheallowabledisplacementsandsafetyfactors.TopGuidePermanent=2.1/SFTopGuideTransient=notspecifiedCoreSupportPermanent=0.75/SFCoreSupportTransient=1.68/SFNormal/UpsetSF=2.25EmergencySF=1.50FaultedSF=1.1255.1TopGuideTheTopGuidealwaysremainsincontactwiththeupperspringandthereisnopermanentdisplacement.Thelimitingconditionforeacheventisthe"allhinge"conditionwhichhasanequivalentdisplacementtotheHlrollercase.Sincethereisonlyoneseismicevent,thedisplacementisthesamefortheUpset,EmergencyandFaultedevents.Thecalculatedmaximumtransientdesigndisplacementis0.904inchesforeachevent.Althoughthe0.904inchisatransientdisplacement,italsosatisfiesthemostrestrictiveallowablepermanentdisplacementrequirementforanUpseteventof0.93inches.5.2CoreSupportAfaultedeventwithseparationatweldH6Aistheonlyconditionwheretheremaybepermanentdisplacementatthecoresupport.Forallothereventsthedisplacementresultsfromthespringcompressionwhichreturnstotheoriginalpositionwhentheloadstops.The"allhinge"case(equivalenttothe"Hlroller"case)isapplicableforUpsetandEmergencyandFaultedevents.
GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1996TANGLLAi4IPLEGSTEPSFIGURE4.1Theaddedextension piecesareinstalled withaspecialtoolforhandlingandtokeepthelegssprungapart.Whenseatedinplace,thetoolreleasesthelegsallowingthemtoclamparoundthelowercontact.Thismethodallowsthepiecetobeinstalled withoutslidingorhavingtoapplyexcessive force.Thesametoolcanbeusedtoremovetheextension pieceifrequired.
4.3FunctionThelowerspringsaredesignedtolimitthecoreplatedisplacement duringaseismicevent.ThelowerspringbearsagainsttheshroudatthecoresupportledgeandextendsabovetheH6AweldandbelowtheH6Bweld.WhentheH6Aweldremainsincontact,whetheritsfailedorothe+vise, thejointismodeledasahingeintheseismicmodelandiscapableofcarryingashearload.DuringasteamlineLOCA,thedploadontheshroudheadissufficient toopena360'hrough wallcrackattheH6Alocation.
Inthisevent,thejointismodeledasarollerintheseismicmodelandisnotcapableofcarryingashearload.Intheeventoffullseparation atweldH6Athecontactextension limitsthepossibleshroudmovementand,togetherwiththecoreplatewedges,providearedundant loadpathforthehorizontal seismicloads.(Thecoresupportstructure isalsoheldinposition


GENEB13-D1739-31RevisionDAugust19965.2.1PermanentDisplacementThemaximumpermanentdisplacementisthedistancetheshroudmovesbeforecontactwithaspringmember.Themachineddistancebetweenthespringloadedshroudcontactsurfaceandtheuppercontactis0.15inches.ThelowercontactalsobearsagainstweldcrownatH68.Theweldcrownisestimatedtobelessthan0.13high.Ifthedisplacementisdirectedmidwaybetweenthetwocontactslocated108'part,thedisplacementisincreasedto0.48inches.(Attachment8.2)Theallowablepermanentdisplacementis0.67inches.5.2.2TransientDisplacementTheboundingtransientdisplacementisacombinationofthemaximumpermanentdisplacementandthemaximumspringcompression.ForUpset,andEmergencyconditions,thereisnopermanentdisplacementandthemaximumtransientdisplacementis0.256inches(Attachment8.1,Table1).TheallowableUpsettransientdisplacementis0.75inches.AssumingtheworstcasescenarioforloaddirectionandspringcharacteristicsforaFaultedevent,themaximumspringcompressionis0.368inches(Attachment8.1,Table1).Themaximumtransientdisplacementbecomes0.85incheswhenroundedtotwoplaces.TheallowableFaultedtransientdisplacementis1.49inches.6.DESIGNBASISThehardwareforbothmodificationsisdesignedandfabricatedtothesamedesignbasisastheoriginalshroudrepairhardware.Themodifiedstabilizerassemblyincludesthesamedesignfeaturesastheoriginalhardware.Allpartsarelockedinplaceorcapturedbymechanicaldevices.ThefabricationrequirementsforthetwoproposedmodificationswillbeinaccordancewiththepreviouslyapprovedfabricationrequirementsfortheNMP-Icoreshroudstabilizers.Thereisnoweldingrequiredduringfabricationorinstallation.Relocatingthelowerspringtotheoppositesideofthestabilizerassemblyisconsistentwiththecoreshroudrepairdesigncriteriaanddesignbasis.Theadditionalcounterboresandlockingpinholesneededtoutilizetheexistingpartshavenoaffectonthestabilizerassemblyfunctionorstresses.Thehandlingandinstallationtoolsarethesameasusedfortheoriginalinstallation.  
GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1996bythecoresupportboltsandbythecoresupportalignerpins.)Withouttakingcreditforthecoresupportboltsoralignerpins,thelimitinglateraldesignloadontheextension istheentire63,800Ibmaximumhorizontal seismicload.Theanalysisinattachments 8.1and8.2showallloadsanddisplacements remainacceptable withtheextension piecesinstalled.
5.DISPLACEMENT SUMMARYAlthoughallcoresupportdisplacements remainacceptable, bothmodifications described in3and4abovedoaffectthedisplacements andchangethevaluesreportedintheoriginalstressreport,GE-NE-B13-01739-04, Rev.0.Thedisplacement valuesreportedbelowsupersede thedisplacement valuesreportedintheoriginalstressreport.Theallowable permanent andtransient displacements aresummarized below.Theshroudrepairhardwaredesignspecification, 25A5583,providesthebasisfortheallowable displacements andsafetyfactors.TopGuidePermanent
=2.1/SFTopGuideTransient
=notspecified CoreSupportPermanent
=0.75/SFCoreSupportTransient
=1.68/SFNormal/UpsetSF=2.25Emergency SF=1.50FaultedSF=1.1255.1TopGuideTheTopGuidealwaysremainsincontactwiththeupperspringandthereisnopermanent displacement.
Thelimitingcondition foreacheventisthe"allhinge"condition whichhasanequivalent displacement totheHlrollercase.Sincethereisonlyoneseismicevent,thedisplacement isthesamefortheUpset,Emergency andFaultedevents.Thecalculated maximumtransient designdisplacement is0.904inchesforeachevent.Althoughthe0.904inchisatransient displacement, italsosatisfies themostrestrictive allowable permanent displacement requirement foranUpseteventof0.93inches.5.2CoreSupportAfaultedeventwithseparation atweldH6Aistheonlycondition wheretheremaybepermanent displacement atthecoresupport.Forallothereventsthedisplacement resultsfromthespringcompression whichreturnstotheoriginalpositionwhentheloadstops.The"allhinge"case(equivalent tothe"Hlroller"case)isapplicable forUpsetandEmergency andFaultedevents.  


GENEB13-D1739-31Revision0August19967.SAFETFCONSIDERATIONSThisevaluationhasinvestigatedmodificationstotheshroudrepairstabilizersatNineMilePoint1whichwillrestorethemtotheirintendeddesignfunction.Theplantlicensingbaseshavebeenreviewed.Thisreviewdemonstratesthatthesemodificationscanbeinstalled(1)withoutanincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentormalfunctionpreviouslyevaluated,(2)withoutcreatingthepossibilityofanaccidentormalfunctionofanewordifferentkindfromanypreviouslyevaluated,(3)andwithoutreducingthemarginofsafetyinthebasesofaTechnicalSpecification.TheGECoreShroudRepairDesignSafetyEvaluation,GE-NE-B13-01739-05,Rev.1hasbeenreviewedforpossibleadverseconsequencesofmovingthelowerspringtotheoppositesideofthestabilizerassembly.ThecoreplatedisplacementsreportedinB.2.1areupdatedtoincludetheaffectsofthelowerspringspacing.The0.75inchtemporarydisplacementduringafaultedeventremainswellthe1.49inchallowableforthisevent.GESafetyEvaluation,GE-NE-B13-01739-5.1,Rev.0,entitled,"ModificationtoGEShroudRepairDesign",wascompletedtoevaluatethetwoproposedmodificationsinaccordancewith10CFR50.59.Thesafetyevaluationconcludedthattheproposedmodificationsdonotinvolveanyunreviewedsafetyquestions.8.ATI'ACHMENTS8.1GENEB13-01739-03,Supplement1,NineMilePoint1SeismicAnalysis,CoreShroudRepairModification8.2GENEB13-01739-04,Supplement4,NineMilePoint1ShroudRepairHardwareStressAnalysis8.3Drawing107E5679Rev.7andPartsList107E5679Rev.5,ReactorModification8.4Specification25A5585Rev.4,StabilizerInstallation}}
GENEB13-D1739-31 RevisionDAugust19965.2.1Permanent Displacement Themaximumpermanent displacement isthedistancetheshroudmovesbeforecontactwithaspringmember.Themachineddistancebetweenthespringloadedshroudcontactsurfaceandtheuppercontactis0.15inches.ThelowercontactalsobearsagainstweldcrownatH68.Theweldcrownisestimated tobelessthan0.13high.Ifthedisplacement isdirectedmidwaybetweenthetwocontactslocated108'part, thedisplacement isincreased to0.48inches.(Attachment 8.2)Theallowable permanent displacement is0.67inches.5.2.2Transient Displacement Theboundingtransient displacement isacombination ofthemaximumpermanent displacement andthemaximumspringcompression.
ForUpset,andEmergency conditions, thereisnopermanent displacement andthemaximumtransient displacement is0.256inches(Attachment 8.1,Table1).Theallowable Upsettransient displacement is0.75inches.Assumingtheworstcasescenarioforloaddirection andspringcharacteristics foraFaultedevent,themaximumspringcompression is0.368inches(Attachment 8.1,Table1).Themaximumtransient displacement becomes0.85incheswhenroundedtotwoplaces.Theallowable Faultedtransient displacement is1.49inches.6.DESIGNBASISThehardwareforbothmodifications isdesignedandfabricated tothesamedesignbasisastheoriginalshroudrepairhardware.
Themodifiedstabilizer assemblyincludesthesamedesignfeaturesastheoriginalhardware.
Allpartsarelockedinplaceorcapturedbymechanical devices.Thefabrication requirements forthetwoproposedmodifications willbeinaccordance withthepreviously approvedfabrication requirements fortheNMP-Icoreshroudstabilizers.
Thereisnoweldingrequiredduringfabrication orinstallation.
Relocating thelowerspringtotheoppositesideofthestabilizer assemblyisconsistent withthecoreshroudrepairdesigncriteriaanddesignbasis.Theadditional counterbores andlockingpinholesneededtoutilizetheexistingpartshavenoaffectonthestabilizer assemblyfunctionorstresses.
Thehandlingandinstallation toolsarethesameasusedfortheoriginalinstallation.
 
GENEB13-D1739-31 Revision0August19967.SAFETFCONSIDERATIONS Thisevaluation hasinvestigated modifications totheshroudrepairstabilizers atNineMilePoint1whichwillrestorethemtotheirintendeddesignfunction.
Theplantlicensing baseshavebeenreviewed.
Thisreviewdemonstrates thatthesemodifications canbeinstalled (1)withoutanincreaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentormalfunction previously evaluated, (2)withoutcreatingthepossibility ofanaccidentormalfunction ofanewordifferent kindfromanypreviously evaluated, (3)andwithoutreducingthemarginofsafetyinthebasesofaTechnical Specification.
TheGECoreShroudRepairDesignSafetyEvaluation, GE-NE-B13-01739-05, Rev.1hasbeenreviewedforpossibleadverseconsequences ofmovingthelowerspringtotheoppositesideofthestabilizer assembly.
Thecoreplatedisplacements reportedinB.2.1areupdatedtoincludetheaffectsofthelowerspringspacing.The0.75inchtemporary displacement duringafaultedeventremainswellthe1.49inchallowable forthisevent.GESafetyEvaluation, GE-NE-B13-01739-5.1, Rev.0,entitled, "Modification toGEShroudRepairDesign",wascompleted toevaluatethetwoproposedmodifications inaccordance with10CFR50.59.
Thesafetyevaluation concluded thattheproposedmodifications donotinvolveanyunreviewed safetyquestions.
8.ATI'ACHMENTS 8.1GENEB13-01739-03, Supplement 1,NineMilePoint1SeismicAnalysis, CoreShroudRepairModification 8.2GENEB13-01739-04, Supplement 4,NineMilePoint1ShroudRepairHardwareStressAnalysis8.3Drawing107E5679Rev.7andPartsList107E5679Rev.5,ReactorModification 8.4Specification 25A5585Rev.4,Stabilizer Installation}}

Revision as of 21:54, 29 June 2018

NMP-1 Core Shroud Repair Mod Summary Rept.
ML17059B241
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/13/1996
From: GLEASON T E, RANGANATH S, SCHRAG M R
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17059B240 List:
References
GENE-B13-01739, GENE-B13-01739-31-R0, GENE-B13-1739, GENE-B13-1739-31-R, NUDOCS 9608210135
Download: ML17059B241 (30)


Text

ENCLOSMILEPOINT1CORESHROUDREPAIRMODIFICATION SARYREPORT96082iOi35 9608i4'DRADQCK,05000220,.

P~',PDR

GENuclearfnerqyGENEB13-P1739-31 Revision0August1996NineMilePoint1CoreShroudRepairModification SummaryReportPreparedfor.NiagaraMohawkPowerCorporation Preparedby:GENuclearEnergyReactorModification Services175CurtnerAvenue,N/C571SanJose,California 95125

GENuclearE'nergyGENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1996NineMilePoint1CoreShroudRepairModification SummaryReportPreparedby:&-/Z-K,TE.Gleason,Principal EngineerReactorModification ServicesReviewedby:Approvedby:N.R.Schrag,IncipalEngineerReactorModification Services<l~jg,S.Ranganath, Engineering FellowGENuclearEnergy

GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1996REVISIONSTATUSSHEETRevisionApprovalS.Ranganath DateInitialIssueDescription

GENEB13-P1739-31 Revision0August1998IMPORTANT NOTICEREGARDING CONTENTSOFTHISREPORTPleaseReadCarefully ThisreportwaspreparedbyGeneralElectricsolelyfortheuseoftheNiagaraMohawkPowerCorporation.

Theinformation contained inthisreportisbelievedbyGeneralElectrictobeanaccurateandtruerepresentation ofthefactsknown,obtainedorprovidedtoGeneralElectricatthetimethisreportwasprepared.

Theonlyundertakings oftheGeneralElectricCompanyrespecting information inthisdocumentarecontained inthecontractgoverning thiswork,andnothingcontained inthisdocumentshallbeconstrued aschangingsaidcontract.

Theuseofthisinformation exceptasdefinedbysaidcontract, orforanypurposeotherthanthatforwhichitisintended, isnotauthorized; andwithrespecttoanysuchunauthorized use,neitherGeneralElectricCompanynoranyofthecontributors tothisdocumentmakesanyrepresentation orwarranty(expressorimplied)astothecompleteness, accuracyofusefulness oftheinformation contained inthisdocumentorthatsuchuseofsuchinformation maynotinfringeprivately ownedrights;nordotheyassumeanyresponsibility forliability ofdamageofanykindwhichmayresultfromsuchuseofsuchinformation.

GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1996CONTENTSl.INTRODUCTION 2.SUMMARYANDCONCLUSIONS 3.TIERODREPLACEMENT MODIFICATION 4.H6ACONTACTEXTENSION 5.DISPLACEMENT SUMMARY6.DESIGNBASIS7.SAFETYCONSIDERATIONS 8.ATTACHMENTS

GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1998l.INTRODUCTION Acoreshroudrepairmodification wasinstalled inNineMilePoint1NuclearPowerPlanttoprovideanalternate loadpathfortheType304stainless steelcircumferential welds,HlthroughH7.Thecoreshroudrepairensuresthestructural integrity ofthecoreshroudbyreplacing thefunctionofweldsHlthroughH7with4stabilizer assemblies, andfourcoreplatewedges.Inthecourseofthepost-installation inspection oftheshroudrepair,threedeviations wereidentified, evaluated andwerefoundacceptable forcontinued plantoperation throughthenextcycle.Afteradditional reviewandevaluation, twoadditional modifications areproposedtoprovidethelongtermcorrective actions.1.1Modification 1:270'ieRodReplacement Thelowerspringofonestabilizer assemblybearsontheblendradiusofthe270'ecirculation nozzle.Theproposedmodification istoreplacethetierodandspringassemblywithonehavingthespringontheoppositesideofthetierod.Thisproposedmodification relocates thespringtobearontheRPVasintended.

1.2ThelowerspringcontactwiththeshrouddoesnotextendbeyondweldH6Aatanyofthefourlocations.

Asaresult,ifweldH6Aisfullycracked,andifthedesigncondition ofasteamlineLOCAplusseismiceventweretooccur,theshroudwouldnotbelaterally constrained totheextentintendedbydesign.Theproposedmodification addsanextension piecetoextendthespringcontactbeyondweldH6Aandrestorethisfeaturetoitsintendedfunction.

Theextendedcontactandthecoreplatewedgesalsoprovidearedundant loadpathbetweenthecoreplateandthelowerspringaswasintendedintheoriginaldesign.Thismodification appliestothe90',166'nd350'tabilizer assemblies.

Thedeviation iscorrected forthereplacement assemblyat270'.2.SUMMARYANDCONCLUSIONS 2.1270'ieRodReplacement Theshroudrepairstabilizer assemblies aredesignedwiththelowerspringlocatedonthesideofthetierod.Theproposedmodification istoreplacethetierodandspringassemblywithonehavingthespringontheoppositeside.Themodification movesthespringsufficiently suchthatitwillbearontheRPVasintended.

Themodification utilizes

GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1998existinghardwarewhichwasbuiltasasparealongwiththeotherstabilizer assemblies.

Onlyminorreworkisrequiredtorelocatethelowerspringandthereworkhasnoaffectonthehardwarefunction.

Themodification doesnotrequireadditional penetrations throughtheshroudsupportconeoranyadditional EDMwork.Themodification usesthesamelowersupportandupperspringassemblies andthereisnochangetotheactualtierodlocation.

Additional analysishasbeendonetoaddressthedesignwherethelowerspringsarenolongerlocated90'part.Thenon-uniform lowerspringspacingaffectsthenetspringcharacteristic whenthehorizontal seismicloadisdirectedbetweentwosprings.Theanalysisshowtheloadsanddisplacements remainacceptable forallconditions.

2.2H6AContactExtension ThelowerspringcontactswiththeshrouddonotextendabovetheH6Aweldaswasintended.

ThedesignfunctioncanberestoredbyaddingaUshapedextension piecetoextendbeyondweldH6A.Theextension piecefitsovertheexistinglowercontactandiscapturedonthelowerextension inalldirections.

Theextension isdesignedtoprovideapositivespringclampingforceagainstthesidesofthelowercontact.Thespringforceisnotrequiredtocapturethepartbutissufficient topreventanyfreemovementorvibrations.

Withthisarrangement, theaddedextension pieceiscapturedinalldirections andisheldsecurebythespringloadedclampingforce.2.3Conclusions Themodifications totheshroudrepairstabilizers atNineMilePoint1willrestorethemtotheirintendeddesignfunction.

Theplantlicensing baseshavebeenreviewed.

Thisreviewdemonstrates thatthesemodifications canbeinstalled (1)withoutanincreaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentormalfunction previously evaluated, (2)withoutcreatingthepossibility ofanaccidentormalfunction ofanewordifferent kindfromanypreviously evaluated, (3)andwithoutreducingthemarginofsafetyinthebasesofaTechnical Specification.

3.TIERODREPLACEMENT MODIFICATION

3.1Background

Thelowerwedgeonthe270'ierodwasfoundtobearagainsttheblendradiusonarecirculation nozzleratherthanonthe'vessel wall.Thissituation isdocumented perFDDREAl-0032andfurtherevaluated inGElKB13-01739-25.

Thatreportaddressed concernsaboutthecontactareaandthestability ofthecontactontheinclinedsurfaceofthenozzleblendradius.

GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1998Thelowerwedgecanberelocated toapositionwithmorecompleted contact(Figure3.1)onthevesselbymovingthelowerspringtotheoppositesideofthestabilizer assembly.

Byrelocating thelowerspring,theconcernsaboutcontactstability andcontactareaareresolvedandthestabilizer assemblymaintains itsintendedfunctional requirements.

IIIIIIIIIIII1i\'IiNozzleBoundary[2'ldLncaIion//I/Nc~LocnlionII.2ln.FIGURE3.13.2.Description NiagaraMohawkPowerCorporation purchased asparetierodassemblyandthisassemblyisintendedtobemodifiedtothealternate configuration.

Applicable designandassemblydrawingsarerevisedtoincludethenewpartsandgroupswhichdefinethealternate configuration.

Alladditional partsandassemblies aredesignedandfabricated tothesamedesignbasisastheoriginalshroudrepairhardware.

Movingthelowerspringtotheoppositesideofthestabilizer assemblyisaccomplished bythestepslistedbelow.a.Removethelowerspringfromtheexistingspareassemblyandthelowercontactfromtheexistinglowerspring.Thestakedlockingpinswillhavetoberemovedtoaccomplish this.Newlockingpinswillhavetobeinstalled inslightlydifferent locations, butthiswillnotaffectthefunctionofthepart.

GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1998b.Modifythelowerspringbyaddingcounterbores totheoppositesideoftheboltholes.Havingcounterbores onbothsidesdoesnotaffectthefunctionofthepart.c.ModifytheC-springbyextending the1.125diameterholethroughthepart.d.Fabricate anewlowercontactwiththeshroudsidedsurfacetaperedtofitontheoppositesideofthestabilizer assembly.

ThenewlowercontactisalsodesignedtoextendbeyondtheH6Aweldtoavoidinstallation ofthecontactextension piece.e.Re-assemble thetierodassembly.

f.Sincethelowerwedgeisatanewposition, newannulusmeasurements arerequiredandthenewlowerwedgemachinedtofitperthemodification drawing.g.Allchangeswillberecordedonamodification drawingrevision.

Nochangesarerequiredfortheuppersupport,theupperspringandthemidsupport.3.3.FunctionThelowerspringisdesignedtorestrictthecoreplatedisplacement duringaseismicevent.Thestabilizer assemblyisdesignedforasinglelowerspringtocarrytheentirehorizontal seismicloadatthecoresupport.However,thedirection oftheloadmaybesuchthatmorethanonespringsharestheload.Thelimitingspringdeflection andspringloadsoccurwhenonlyoneofthelowerspringsreactstotheentirehorizontal load.Relocating thespringhasnoaffectonthemaximumspringloadormaximumspringdeflection.

Relocating thelowerspringdoeschangethespacingbetweenadjacentspringsandthespacingdoesaffectthenetreactionwhentwospringssharethelateralload.ThelowerspringcontactwiththeRPVischangedbyabout4'ymovingittotheoppositesideoftheuerod.The4'hangefromtheas-installed locationresultsinamaximum108'pacing betweenadjacentlowersprings.Theminimumspacingbetweenadjacentlowerspringsis76'.Whenthefourlowerspringsare90'part,theequivalent springconstantisthesameforalldirections oftheappliedload.Theequivalent springconstantisthetotalloadappliedbythelowerspringsdividedbythedisplacement inthedirection oftheappliedload.Becauseofthenon-uniform springspacing,thevariation inequivalent springconstantis 1

GENEB13-D1739-31 RevisionDAugust1998from+24%to-31%.Anincreaseintheequivalent springconstanttendstoincreasethetotalreactionloadanddecreasethetotaldisplacement.

Althoughthetotalreactionloadincreases, theloadissharedbytwospringsandtheloadoneitherspringisboundedbythecasewhereonespringcarriestheentireload.Adecreaseinequivalent springconstantresultsinalargerdisplacement inthedirection oftheload.Additional analysisinAttachments 8.1and8.2showallloadsanddisplacements remainacceptable forthismodification.

4.H6ACONTACTEXTENSION 4.1.Background ThelowercontactsdonotextendabovetheH6Aweldaswasintendedtosatisfytheintendeddesignrequirements.

TheReactorModification Drawing,107E5679Revision6,showstheas-installed positionofthelowercontactsandtheH6Aweld.Thesituation resultedfrominsufficient margininthelowercontactdesigntoaccountfortheuncertainties intheas-builtgeometryoftheshroudsupportcone.Thisabovedeviation fromtheintendeddesigncondition isdescribed andevaluated inFDDREAl-0031.

Theevaluation showedthecoreplateboltsaresufficient tomaintainthecoreplatealignment withoutthelowercontactextending aboveweldH6A.Theevaluation considered theboltclampingloadandtheelasticproperties oftheboltstoshowallowable coreplatedisplacement wasnotexceeded.'dding theextension pieceprovidesadditional designmarginandassurance thatthecoreplatealignment ismaintained.

4.2Description Thelowercontactsatazimuths90',166'nd350'remodifiedtoextendbeyondtheH6AweldbyaddingaUshapedextension pieceshowninFigure4.1.Theextension piecefitsovertheexistinglowercontactwiththelegsoftheUextending aroundthesidesoftheexistinglowercontact.Thestepsattheendsofthelegsfitunderthelowercontacttopreventaxialmovement.

Atangatthetopextension fitsinthegapbetweenthelowercontactandthelowerspringtorestrictthehorizontal movement.

Theaddedextension pieceiscapturedinalldirections ontheexistinglowercontact.Thelegsoftheextension provideapositivespringclampingforce(40lbto50lb)againstthesidesofthelowercontact.Thisforceissufficient topreventanyfreemovementorvibrations.

Withthisarrangement, theaddedextension pieceiscapturedinalldirections andisheldsecurebythespringloadedclampingforce.

GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1996TANGLLAi4IPLEGSTEPSFIGURE4.1Theaddedextension piecesareinstalled withaspecialtoolforhandlingandtokeepthelegssprungapart.Whenseatedinplace,thetoolreleasesthelegsallowingthemtoclamparoundthelowercontact.Thismethodallowsthepiecetobeinstalled withoutslidingorhavingtoapplyexcessive force.Thesametoolcanbeusedtoremovetheextension pieceifrequired.

4.3FunctionThelowerspringsaredesignedtolimitthecoreplatedisplacement duringaseismicevent.ThelowerspringbearsagainsttheshroudatthecoresupportledgeandextendsabovetheH6AweldandbelowtheH6Bweld.WhentheH6Aweldremainsincontact,whetheritsfailedorothe+vise, thejointismodeledasahingeintheseismicmodelandiscapableofcarryingashearload.DuringasteamlineLOCA,thedploadontheshroudheadissufficient toopena360'hrough wallcrackattheH6Alocation.

Inthisevent,thejointismodeledasarollerintheseismicmodelandisnotcapableofcarryingashearload.Intheeventoffullseparation atweldH6Athecontactextension limitsthepossibleshroudmovementand,togetherwiththecoreplatewedges,providearedundant loadpathforthehorizontal seismicloads.(Thecoresupportstructure isalsoheldinposition

GENEB13-01739-31 Revision0August1996bythecoresupportboltsandbythecoresupportalignerpins.)Withouttakingcreditforthecoresupportboltsoralignerpins,thelimitinglateraldesignloadontheextension istheentire63,800Ibmaximumhorizontal seismicload.Theanalysisinattachments 8.1and8.2showallloadsanddisplacements remainacceptable withtheextension piecesinstalled.

5.DISPLACEMENT SUMMARYAlthoughallcoresupportdisplacements remainacceptable, bothmodifications described in3and4abovedoaffectthedisplacements andchangethevaluesreportedintheoriginalstressreport,GE-NE-B13-01739-04, Rev.0.Thedisplacement valuesreportedbelowsupersede thedisplacement valuesreportedintheoriginalstressreport.Theallowable permanent andtransient displacements aresummarized below.Theshroudrepairhardwaredesignspecification, 25A5583,providesthebasisfortheallowable displacements andsafetyfactors.TopGuidePermanent

=2.1/SFTopGuideTransient

=notspecified CoreSupportPermanent

=0.75/SFCoreSupportTransient

=1.68/SFNormal/UpsetSF=2.25Emergency SF=1.50FaultedSF=1.1255.1TopGuideTheTopGuidealwaysremainsincontactwiththeupperspringandthereisnopermanent displacement.

Thelimitingcondition foreacheventisthe"allhinge"condition whichhasanequivalent displacement totheHlrollercase.Sincethereisonlyoneseismicevent,thedisplacement isthesamefortheUpset,Emergency andFaultedevents.Thecalculated maximumtransient designdisplacement is0.904inchesforeachevent.Althoughthe0.904inchisatransient displacement, italsosatisfies themostrestrictive allowable permanent displacement requirement foranUpseteventof0.93inches.5.2CoreSupportAfaultedeventwithseparation atweldH6Aistheonlycondition wheretheremaybepermanent displacement atthecoresupport.Forallothereventsthedisplacement resultsfromthespringcompression whichreturnstotheoriginalpositionwhentheloadstops.The"allhinge"case(equivalent tothe"Hlroller"case)isapplicable forUpsetandEmergency andFaultedevents.

GENEB13-D1739-31 RevisionDAugust19965.2.1Permanent Displacement Themaximumpermanent displacement isthedistancetheshroudmovesbeforecontactwithaspringmember.Themachineddistancebetweenthespringloadedshroudcontactsurfaceandtheuppercontactis0.15inches.ThelowercontactalsobearsagainstweldcrownatH68.Theweldcrownisestimated tobelessthan0.13high.Ifthedisplacement isdirectedmidwaybetweenthetwocontactslocated108'part, thedisplacement isincreased to0.48inches.(Attachment 8.2)Theallowable permanent displacement is0.67inches.5.2.2Transient Displacement Theboundingtransient displacement isacombination ofthemaximumpermanent displacement andthemaximumspringcompression.

ForUpset,andEmergency conditions, thereisnopermanent displacement andthemaximumtransient displacement is0.256inches(Attachment 8.1,Table1).Theallowable Upsettransient displacement is0.75inches.Assumingtheworstcasescenarioforloaddirection andspringcharacteristics foraFaultedevent,themaximumspringcompression is0.368inches(Attachment 8.1,Table1).Themaximumtransient displacement becomes0.85incheswhenroundedtotwoplaces.Theallowable Faultedtransient displacement is1.49inches.6.DESIGNBASISThehardwareforbothmodifications isdesignedandfabricated tothesamedesignbasisastheoriginalshroudrepairhardware.

Themodifiedstabilizer assemblyincludesthesamedesignfeaturesastheoriginalhardware.

Allpartsarelockedinplaceorcapturedbymechanical devices.Thefabrication requirements forthetwoproposedmodifications willbeinaccordance withthepreviously approvedfabrication requirements fortheNMP-Icoreshroudstabilizers.

Thereisnoweldingrequiredduringfabrication orinstallation.

Relocating thelowerspringtotheoppositesideofthestabilizer assemblyisconsistent withthecoreshroudrepairdesigncriteriaanddesignbasis.Theadditional counterbores andlockingpinholesneededtoutilizetheexistingpartshavenoaffectonthestabilizer assemblyfunctionorstresses.

Thehandlingandinstallation toolsarethesameasusedfortheoriginalinstallation.

GENEB13-D1739-31 Revision0August19967.SAFETFCONSIDERATIONS Thisevaluation hasinvestigated modifications totheshroudrepairstabilizers atNineMilePoint1whichwillrestorethemtotheirintendeddesignfunction.

Theplantlicensing baseshavebeenreviewed.

Thisreviewdemonstrates thatthesemodifications canbeinstalled (1)withoutanincreaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentormalfunction previously evaluated, (2)withoutcreatingthepossibility ofanaccidentormalfunction ofanewordifferent kindfromanypreviously evaluated, (3)andwithoutreducingthemarginofsafetyinthebasesofaTechnical Specification.

TheGECoreShroudRepairDesignSafetyEvaluation, GE-NE-B13-01739-05, Rev.1hasbeenreviewedforpossibleadverseconsequences ofmovingthelowerspringtotheoppositesideofthestabilizer assembly.

Thecoreplatedisplacements reportedinB.2.1areupdatedtoincludetheaffectsofthelowerspringspacing.The0.75inchtemporary displacement duringafaultedeventremainswellthe1.49inchallowable forthisevent.GESafetyEvaluation, GE-NE-B13-01739-5.1, Rev.0,entitled, "Modification toGEShroudRepairDesign",wascompleted toevaluatethetwoproposedmodifications inaccordance with10CFR50.59.

Thesafetyevaluation concluded thattheproposedmodifications donotinvolveanyunreviewed safetyquestions.

8.ATI'ACHMENTS 8.1GENEB13-01739-03, Supplement 1,NineMilePoint1SeismicAnalysis, CoreShroudRepairModification 8.2GENEB13-01739-04, Supplement 4,NineMilePoint1ShroudRepairHardwareStressAnalysis8.3Drawing107E5679Rev.7andPartsList107E5679Rev.5,ReactorModification 8.4Specification 25A5585Rev.4,Stabilizer Installation