ML17309A416: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:ATELEDYNEENGINE=" | {{#Wiki_filter:ATELEDYNEENGINE="RING SFRVICFS7mCi-j>j)C~A~ | ||
't | RE~OP7TR-3454-1 ASMESECT)ONX)FRACTUREhlECHANlCSEVALUAT)ON OFlNLETNOZZ~MINSERV)CP. | ||
NSPEC~.)ON.INDICAT)QNR.E.GINNAUNITNO.1REACTORVESSELMARCH151979 | |||
't ROCHESTER GASll(ELECTRICCORPORATIOi'l 89EASTAVENUEROCHESTER, NY14649R.E.GIf'lilAUNITNO.1REACTORVESSELTECHNICAL REPORTTR-3454-1 ASHESECTIOf'l XIFRACTUREHECHANICS EVALUATION OFINLETNOZZLEINSERVICE | |||
.Ii'lSPECTIOi'l IffDICATIOff i~1ARCH1",1979)iiTELEDYNEENGli4E=~lNG SERViCES303BEARHILLROAD'P/ALTHAiYi, MASSACHUSETTS 02154 | |||
TABLEOFCONTENTSABSTRACT | TABLEOFCONTENTSABSTRACT | ||
Line 25: | Line 28: | ||
==2.0CONCLUSION== | ==2.0CONCLUSION== | ||
==3.0 DESCRIPTION== | |||
OFVESSELANDREPORTEDFLAW4.0COMPARISON OFGINNA-1REPORTEDFLAWWITHPREYIOUSLY EVALUATED FLAWS5.0MATERIALPROPERTIES 6.07.08.0PRESSURE-TEMPERATURE LIMITSSTRESSANALYSiSFATIGUECRACKGROWTH9.0FRACTUREMECHANICS ANALYSISANDCRITERIA10.0ELASTIC-PLASTi'CANALYSISAPPENDICES A.STRESSANALYSISB.EF"=CTOFFLAWSiZEANDTOUGHNESS VARIATiONS C.E"FFECTOFAPPLIEDSTRESSVARIATiONS D.ELASTiC-PLASTICEVALUATION A4-3 | |||
ENG',NEWlRG SERVICESABSTRACTITheInservice Inspection indication ofanearmid-wallflawinthereactorpressurevesselinletnozzleN2hasbeenevaluated inaccordance withtherequirements ofSectionXIoftheASHEBoilerandPressureVesselCode.Thereportedflawsatisfies theCodecriteriaforacceptance byeval-uation.Therefore, atleastwithrespecttothisindication, thevessel.isacceptable forserviceasiswithoutremovalorrepairoftheindication. | |||
\1.0INTRODUCTIOH R.E.G>nnaUnitHo.1isaWestinghouse PWRwhichwentintocommercial serviceinJune,1970.Thereactorpressurevessel,constructed bytheBabcock6Wilcox.Companywas.subjected toanInservice Inspection inaccordance withTechnical Specification andSectionXIoftheASHEBoilerandPressureVesselCoderequirements. | |||
Whencertainalleviating factorsarenotconsidered, anultrasonic indication inexcessofthesizepermitted foracceptance byexamination wasidentified intheweldwhichattachedaninletnozzletothevessel.Insupportofotherapproaches beingfollowedbyRochester GasandElectricpersonnel,. | |||
TeledyneEngineering Services(TES)wasrequested to,eval-uatethereportedindication inaccordance withtheSectionXIrequirements foracceptance byevaluation. | |||
Thisreportcontainstheresultsofthatin-.vestigations~ | |||
A4-5 | |||
2. | Z.OCONCLUSIONS 2.1Thereportedflawsatisfies theCodecriteriaforacceptance byevaluation, soisacceptable forserviceasiswithoutremoval~~orrepairoftheindication. | ||
3. | 2.2Forthereportedflaw,ofdimensions: | ||
Through-wall depth=2a=0.93inchesLenth=I=5.3inchesEccentricity | |||
=e=1.0inches,thecalculated stressintensity factoris9.2ksi~in.TheCodeacceptable valueis63.2ksi/in.Therefore, thetotalfactorofi21.7ascornaredtothecoderequiredfactorofsafetyof~10:3.16.2.3Theeffectofvariations inflawsizeortoughness ofthematerialcanbedetermined romFigure1.Basedupontheresultsplotte'hereon,aflawofthrough-wall dimension 2a=4.0inches,wouldsatisyCodeacceptance requirements evenifthetoughness we.oreducedzo67ksivin.Theef-"ofvariant.onsinapp1iedstressacrossthe7(awcan"edet.mined=romFigure2.Basedupontheresultsplot-.edtherein,tnerepor-dflaw,Za=0.93inches,wouldsatisfyCodeacceptance require:-;.-=. | |||
tseveni=theappliedstressacrosstheflawwereequa;totheyieldstrengthofthematerial, or51<si,whichever islower.Statddifferently, thecalculatdpressuresLressactiingacrosstheflawcouldbeincreased byafactorinexcessof6wi-;nouiviolation oftheCodecriteria. | |||
2.5Anelastic-plastic fracturemechanics | |||
: analysis, following themethodsappliedbyDr.P.C.Parisasaconsultant toNRCtoasimilarinvestigation indicated that:a.Thefactorofsafetyagainstplasticinstability failureisinexcessof3foraflawthrough-wall dimension inexcessof2a=4inches.b.Foraflawthrough-wall dimension inexcessof2a=4inches,yieldingcanoccurandresidualstresses, suchasthosewhichresultfromweldin,'nddiscontinuity | |||
: stresses, suchaqthosewhichresultfromterneraturedifferentials orfrompipereactionstresses, wouldbeeliminated fromconsideration. | |||
Althoughthisevaluation resultsintheconclusion thatsuchstressesmaybeignored,suchstresseswereconsidered intheevaluations whichleadtothepreviously listedconclusions. | |||
2.6ThepreviousMCAP-8503 ASHEIII,AppendixGanalysiswasreviewedtodetermine ifthepressureofthereportedflawrequiresare-e!aluat:on oftheAppendixGrequirements. | |||
Itisaconclusion ofthisreviewthattheMestingnouse evaluation ofapostulated flawinthevicinityofanoutletnozzlerepresents amucnmoresigni-f;:cantsituation thandoesthereportedflaw.Tnerefore, accepz-abiiitofthepostulated outletnozzleflawlsfu1tnerconfirmac'.on | |||
,oftheacceptability ofthereportedflaw.A4-7 II>>" | |||
==3.0 DESCRIPTION== | |||
OFVESSELANDREPORTEDFLAWTheGinnaUnit1ReactorPressureYesse1(RPV)wasfabricated bytheBabcock5WilcoxCompany(85W)totherequirements ofSectionIIIoftheASt<EBoilerandPressureVesselCodeinaccordance withWestinghouse ElectricCompany(W)Equip-mentSpecification Ho.676206Revision0withAddendum676554,Revision0.TheRPVStressReorts'reB8W1966,ReportsNumbers.1through12.rTheinsidediameter, totheinnersurfaceofthecladding, is132inches.Theminimumcladthickness is5/32inches.Thewallthickness is61/2inchesatthebeltlineand9inchesatthenozzlecourse.Thenozzlecoursecontainstwo521/2inchoutsidediameterinletnozzles,two49inchdiameteroutletnoz-'lesandtwonominal4inchdiametersafetyinjection nozzles.Theinletandoutletnozzlesareata-commonel'evation. | |||
AsketchoftheinletnozzleisshowninFigure3,withthedimensions oftheweldpreparation ontheODofthenozzlesketchesabove.Thisconfigure-ion ismportantbecauseitlocatesthereportedflaw.Figure4showstheinne.por-tionofthisweldprepa.ationwiththereportedflawlyingalongthelineAC.Thereweldprparationdimensions aredefinedonaradialplanethroughthevesselcen-erline | |||
(==0'360').Sincetheweldoreparation ismachinedcylindrcallywiththenozzlecenterline, theradialdis-ancebe-'.veen theinsideofthe.esse.and-heweldpreparation landvarieswithradialposition~.Theflawisloca-;edbe-ween305'9<316.5",approximately the10:30o'lockpositionwnenlook':ngalongthenozzlecenterline fromoutsideofthevessel.Figure4indicates | |||
:~eradialdistancefromtheRPVIDtoPointDasvaryingbetween4.2and..1inches.Thereportedflaw"through-wall"dimension measuredalongtheweldprepa.ation is0.93inches.Forpurposesofanalysis, SectionXIpermitsthisflawtobre-olvedintoa"throuah-wall" dimension measuredperpendicular tothevess'elsur-facewhichwoulddecreasethe2adimension, Becauseofthecomplexgeometry, advantage isnottakenofthisfactor.Theflawlength,measuredaroundthecir-cumVerence oftheweldpreparation asthedistancebetween305'nd316.5's5.27 ENG)NEER)NG SERVtCESinches.SectionXIdefinestheflaweccentricity asthedistancebetween.theflawcenterandthevesselmidplane. | |||
ThedistancefromthevesselIDtotheflawcentervariesbetweenapproximately 3.55and4.47inches.Conservatively neglecting theincreased thickness resulting fromtheouternozzlecornerradius,therefore takingthetotalthickness as9inches;theeccentrici tyvariesbetweenapproximately 0and1".8asedupontheabovediscussion, andnotingthatanincreaseineccentricity increases thecalculated stressintensity factor,theflawisdefinedforpur-posesofanalysisbythedimensions: | |||
pa=0.93inches1=5.3inchese=1.0inch Ilay AENGINEERING SERVICES4.0COMPARISON OFGINNA-1REPORTEDFLAWWITHPREVIOUSLY EVALUATED FLAWSForpurposesofexamining pressure-temperature limitations, WCAP-8503* | |||
considered theeffectsofaflawadjacenttotheoutletnozzle.Althoughthere~$Naredifferences ingeometrybetweentheinletandoutletnozzles,thestressesareverysimilar.Thisevaluation considered asurfaceflawinaplanepassingthroughtheRPVcenterline ofdepthequalto1.8inches{a/t=0.20)andsurfacelengthof1,8inches{aspectratioof1:6).Sinceasurfaceflawof'givenlengthanddepthresultsinapproximately thesamestressintensity factorasdoesasubsurface. | |||
flawofthesamelengthandtwicethethrough-wall dimension, theWCAP-8503 evaluation isequivalent tothaiwhichwouldbeobtainedforamid-wallflawof2a=3.6and1=10.8inthesameorientation...In fact,theWCAPevalu-'Iationwouldbeveryconservative becausethesurfaceissubject,todiscontinuity stresseswhichhavebutlittleeffectnearmidplane. | |||
Ofevenmoreimportance, however,isthediffe.enceinorientation betweenthetwoflaws.Theindicated Ginnaflawiscircumferential tothenozzleandtheWCAPflawisradialtothenozzle;therefore, thepressurestressnormaltotheWCAPflawisaboutthretimesaslargeast.atnormaltotheGinnaindication. | |||
The.efore,theindic'tdGinnaflawisofconsiderable lesssignificance thanthenozzleflawusedfortheAppendixGevaluation ofiheGinnavesselThemid-wall, nozzleattachment weldflawmostsimilartothatindicesdinGinna-1whichhasbeensubjected toextensveinvestigation byTESandbythe*HRCistheindication inthePilgrim-1 recirculation inletnozzleNZBwhichwasfirstdetec.edin1974andwnichwasreevaluated in1976bybothTESandHRC.Thesignificant parameters maybecomparedasfollows,usingthePilgrimvaluesevaluated byTES:ttWCAP-8'03, "ASMEIII,AppendixGAnalysisofRochester GashElectricCorporation R.E.GinnaUnitHo.1ReactorVessel,July1975. | |||
10.0ELASTIC-PLASTICA! | AFEi~jNEER)NG SERVICESPlant:Depth,2a,in.Length,1,in.Eccentricity, e,in..Hoopstressinvessel,ksi(atoperating pressure) | ||
Yessejthickness 6irma-I0.935.31.016.59.05.2~PI'Irim-11,55.20.5516.27.010.7TheNRCevaluation assumedsomewhatmoreconservative parameters. | |||
SoththeTESandHRCevajuations concluded thawthePilgrim-1 RPYwassatisfactory iorcontinued service.Tnecalculated stressntensiy=actorsforGInna-1woutdbeexpectedtobemuchsmallerthanthosecomputed=orPilgrim-l. | |||
Sasedupontheseiwocomparisons withpreviously evaluated flaws,onewouidjudgethaitheGinna-1vesselwouldeasilysatisfytheSectionXlcriria=oracceptance byevaluation. | |||
A4-11 t'jIt,KIr | |||
==5.0 HATERIALPROPERTIES== | |||
4~~BaseduponthevaluespublishedinWCAP-8421*, | |||
-theunirradiatedmateria1properties ofthenozzle,usingoutletnozzledata,andoftheweld,usingbeltlinewelddata,areasfollows:LocationRTNDTCyShelf,ft-1bNozzleWeld0.090.236001258018Thecomputedend-of-life fluenceatthenozzleelevation is1.08(IO)atone-quarter thickness. | |||
UsingRegulatory Guide'l.99,Revision1,theend-of-lifeproperties arecomputedas:LocationNDT',fShelf,ft-lbNozzleWeld607011262!I,inWCAP-8503 hasusedanuppershelfKl=200ksi~n.IRTheSect-ionXItoughness versustemoerature curvesareplottedinFigure=foranend-of-life RTi'=70F.sUl"'iCAP-8421, AnalysisofCapsuleRFromtheRochester GasandlectricCorporation R.:.GinnaUnitNo.1ReactorilesselRadiation Surveillance Program,November, 1974. | |||
I 6.0PRESSURE-TEMPERATURE LIMITSTheupperlimitoftheTechnical Specification heatupand.cooldowncurvesarealsoplottedonFigure5.Becausetheselimitsarecontrolled bythe.higherfluencebeltlineregion,full'operating | |||
: pressure, ZZSOpsig,isnotpermitted below315F.Thistemperature isonthetoughness uppershelfbyamargininexcessof100F., | |||
)>TELEDYNEENGINEERING SERVICES7.0STRESSANALYSISThesignificant stressesactingacrosstheflawindication arethoseduetovesselpressureandduetoweldingresidualstresses. | |||
Atthenearmid-walllocation, thermalstressesandstressesresulting frompipereactioneffectsarenegligible. | |||
Thepressurestressesofinterestarethoseactinginaradialdirectionwithrespecttothenozzle.Inthemainshellcourseawayfromthenozzle,theoperating pressureof2250psigcausesahoopstressequalto16.5ksiandanaxialstressequalto8.3ksi.Thepresenceofthenozzlereducestheradialstress,sineataradiusequaltothenozzleboreradiusthestressesmustbeequalto-2,3ksi,Iwhere'the negativesignindicates compression. | |||
Inthecourseofevaluating similarflawsinothervessels,averysimplestresscalculation technique wasfoundtogiveexcellent answersforthepressurmemoranestressacrosstheflaw.Specifically, thevaluesobtainedwiththsim-oleapproximation maybecomparedtoothersolutions asfollows:!!ethodSimp1eapproximat-:.on30finiteelement08C8.710.3membraneinnersurfacemid-walloutersurface20axisymmetric model,doubled7.7innerwall10.0mid-wailThi5slmpleapproximat ionisusedinthisevaluation.inordertoobtainthepressurestressactingnormaltotheF')aw,ascontained inAooendix.A. | |||
><TELEDYNEEiNGIREERNG SERVICESTheresidualstressesusedinthisevaluation areaconservative approximation tothosemeasuredinaheavyweldmentafterpost-weld heattreatment*. | |||
Thesedataindicatethattheresidualstrsssesvarythroughthethickness withacosinerelationship from8.0ksitensileonthesurfacesto8.0ksicompression atmid-wall.Despiteconiirmation ofthepresenceofcompressive residualstressesatmidwallbyremovalofasimilarflawtotheoneunderconsideration inaRP'J.Hocreditistakenforthesecompressive stressesinthisanalysis. | |||
Instead,theresidualstressesareconsidered tovaryasacosinefunctionthroughthethickness with8.0ksitensileonthesurfacesto0ksiatthecenter.Previousevaluation ofarecirculation inletnozzleinaBtlR,whichissub-jectedtolargertemperature changesthanisthesubjectPHRinletnozzle,indi-catesthatthermalstressesarenotsignificant aslongastheflawdoesnotapproachwithinabout11/2"fromtheinnersurface,Thisistrueduringnormalandabnormaloperations becausetheinletnozzleandtheadjacentvesselaresuojected tothesametemperature transient andaresimilarinthickness. | |||
Tnere-fore,thermalstresseffectsarenotconsidered tobeofimportance intherangeoiilawsizesconsidered, 2a<4inches.Pipereactionstressesiniheweldregionareprimarily bendingstressesvaryingiromtensileaionesurfacetocompressive attheother.Sincethere-sortedilawoiinte.estisnearmid-wall, pipereactionstressesacrossthetaware'.'nsignificant. | |||
Asaresultoithisdiscussion, theonlystressesusedinthefracturemechanics analysisofAopendix8arethosewhichresultfrominternalpressureandtheweldr'esidual stresses. | |||
Sincetheresulting stressintensity factorisverylow,aquestionoftenarisesastotheconsequences ofanerrorinthecal-culatedstress.Forthisreason,anadditional evaluation, AppendixC,ismadefortheindicated flawdimensions givingthestressintensity factorwhichwouldbe'computod forarbitrary valuesoimembranestressactingacrosstheflaw.D..'.Ferr'.'(1 P."".~uhlandD.R.l1iller,".'4easurement o7Residua1Stressesina"e'6e'lT.qsr';te'd.,'na | |||
~pumaIResea,cnUDDlemenr., | |||
tlovemoer i"coA4-15 | |||
)<TELEDYNEZG;XEERIXG SERVICESWithrespecttoFaultedConditions, theinletnozzleprovidesthepathforinjection flowforabout40minutesfollowing aLOCA.Forthefirst20secondstheflowisfromthesafetyinjection accumulators atatemperature of90'F.Atthattimethesafetyinjection pumpsarestartedanddeliver155Ffluidfromtheboricacidtanks.At140secondsfollowing LOCAinitiation theflowtrans-ferstotherefueling waterstoragetankandthewatertemperature dropsto'60F.Attheendof40minutesflowswitchestothecontainment dumpandflowisataminimumof140F,Thereactorpressuredropstonearzeroimmediately following aLOCA.TheotherFaultedCondition ofconcernisaLargeSteamline BreakAccidenl(LSBA).Following aLSBAthereactorcoolanttemperature endpressurerapidlydecreases. | |||
Whenthepressuredescreases below1450psig,flowfromtheboricacidstoragetanksentersthevesselat155F.Safetyinjection terminates tenminutesaftertheLSBA.Flowduringtheseeventsisthroughtheinletnozzleanddownthevessel.Becausethenozzleandvesselareofaboutthesamethickness, butsmallthe.maldiscontinuity stressesresult.Analysisofsimilartransient inothernozzlesindicates thermalstressesacrosstheweldoflessthan5ksi.Sincethepressurenasdecreased, thetotalstressintensity factor,fortheFaultedCondition is,smallerthanthatcalculated duringnormaloperation. | |||
Therefore, postulatee sur-facflawsinthevesselbeltlineregionaremorelimitingthanisthereportednozzleweldflaw.A4-16 Cll~J' Ei~tNEERIRG SERY}CES8.0FATIGUECRACKGROWTHBecauseoftheoperating characteristics ofaPWR,theinletnozzletemperature variations withinthepowerrangearenegligible. | |||
Evenwhencoolanttemperature | |||
'changesdooccur,thenozzleandvesselrespondsimilarly inthatthermaldiscontinuity stressesarenegligibl'e inthevicinityofthereportedflaw.Skin-type thermalstressesmaybesignificant atandneartheinnersurfaces, butnotinthevicinityofthereportedflaw.Therefore theonlycycleofimportance togrowthofthereportedflawispressurization anddepressurization. | |||
ForthereportedFlaw,theaKforpres-.surization to2500'psig,thedesignpressure, isonly8.7ksi.An.Forasubsurface flaw,FigureA-4300-1predictsafatiguecrackgrowthrateof8(10)in/cycleforpressurization to2500psig.Therefore nofatiguecrackgrowthispredicted. | |||
l EiMNEERjl4GSERVCES9.0FRACTUREMECHANICS ANALYSISANDCRITERIAThelinearelasticfracturemechanics methodsofAppendixA,SectionXIoftheASMECodeareused.Thesemethodsareconservative, butarenotoverlyconservative intheabsenceofsteepstressgradients asisthecaseinthissolution. | |||
Theacceptance criteriausedarethosebasedonappliedstressintensity factorascontained intheSummer1978AddendatoSectionXIoftheASMECode,IWB-3612. | |||
Thesecriteriaareidentical tothoseusedinthePilgrim-1 evalu-ation,althoughatthattimethecriteriawerereferenced toaJunell,1974letterfromASMEtoBostonEdison. | |||
10.0ELASTIC-PLASTICA!HALYSIS Attachment 4tothe!'(RCStaffEvaluation ofthe1976Pilgrim-1 ISIresults,datedApril21,1976,summarizes anelastic-plastic FractureMechanics Analysisperformed byOr.P.C.Parisasaconsultant toNRC.AppendixOtothisreportcontainsanelastic-plastic analysisapplicable totheGinna-1situation whichfollowsParis'lternative secondary stresscomputation method.Alsoconsidered isthemaximumilawsizewhichwouldresultinretention ofafactorofsafetyofburstofatleast,three.Thisanalysisi.ndicates thataflawthrough-wall (2a)dimension inexcssof4inchesisrequiredto'reducethefactorofsafetybelow3.0,usingananalysiswhichassumesaverylongflaw.Inaddition,thisanalysisshowsthatanyresidualorsecondary stresseswnicharepresentinthestructure willbeeliminated byyieldingaslongastheflawdepth(2a),islessthananu;.-be.inexcessof4".Thatis,weldresidualstresses, thermalstressesandpipereactionstressesneednotbeconside.edinevaluating thevesse!saic-yif2a<4inches. | |||
41 Ie[1 | 41 Ie[1 | ||
I=Jqo~EZ79~svG~oatm-'HKD.ETDATE~ITr~FI--"ct'l=Wre< | I=Jqo~EZ79~svG~oatm-'HKD.ETDATE~ITr~FI--"ct'l= | ||
Wre<iegTfcc3gAJIATIoNS SHETHO.OFFEOAEO.-'4<~70~~I~~~:.I..:IIII~r~I~~It~'r'I...L......~rI/+orox~\0~~~~I~rI304Jr~<<~~~~~204JfDt~~r~~~rI~tt~).BIO~~I4oME/v)ggAggSTRK55I...G.p~,-K's1r 1 | |||
t/6A~3.,i,.dr.is<a.->-i.(~.&(wJg(rtI7'i'g/0F~QZzS2.7qlc>3Z1ItMtM27.7eqGV3'JcPi)4l-.NP,ntylI~~Xg'.) | t/6A~3.,i,.dr.is<a.->-i.(~.&(wJg(rtI7'i'g/0F~QZzS2.7qlc>3Z1ItMtM27.7eqGV3'JcPi)4l-.NP,ntylI~~Xg'.) | ||
goz.alega~c-QP/g/6gcQfro~.pa)>g/gQo'csscIZP(~~c../cot)~~ai~vcrJwvgLccIvg8lc,I4J<c't.9io<N.F35770"~,/%7g,(fa4.3/(~'~~~~~0~Q*~~~.,O.P~(0,.(l,>el)f0nb)Jl*Ip~/~c./5'-.9g.',/gIID(st',4.o[2Ci'C&$,2C.s/8lS)Ic~c.~~Ie~y+jgggfvgdf<lcc~fcv~Ecld~ick;pO09s0(.:f~J>go~~3]LAL/<f7t/3.5XO.999 II | goz.alega~c-QP/g/6gcQfro~.pa)>g/gQo'csscIZP(~~c../cot)~~ai~vcrJwvgLccIvg8lc,I4J<c't.9io | ||
(~P~~~PN~l4 Cl | <N.F35770"~,/%7g,(fa4.3/(~'~~~~~0~Q*~~~.,O.P~(0,.(l,>el)f0nb)Jl*Ip~/~c./5'-.9g.', | ||
/gIID(st',4.o[2Ci'C&$,2C.s/8lS)Ic~c.~~Ie~y+jgggfvgdf<lcc~fcv~Ecld~ick;pO09s0(.:f~J>go~~3]LAL/<f7t/3.5XO.999 II | |||
(~P~~~PN~l4 Cl Technical Report'TR-3454-1 FAG'NEE~)NG SERVICESAPPENDIXA | |||
/71lMChD/sTANcFJA'HG5O4iYo~0tO I | /71lMChD/sTANcFJA'HG5O4iYo~0tO I | ||
0~li~p4rrPk~pJ~~ | 0~li~p4rrPk~pJ~~ | ||
iav4Moira~Z-~~.sv~aim>>>>~SHEETNa.OFwm.xo.~~<>~~~l~~4THE'ESUL. | iav4Moira~Z-~~.sv~aim>>>>~SHEETNa.OFwm.xo.~~<>~~~l~~4THE'ESUL.75 ARE:.COA'SERiA 7/VEJ3ECAUS'E'HZRESTRAMieGEF'FEC75...Ok"WPE'",hlo2PiG', | ||
RE)WFOacE-~~/V)6'iV7HAYE82ZHNE,6LEdPRESSdRE'N | |||
.TAG...A'd'.2+4':'s& | |||
'AS.HAsTHE'.:M"D~D.OD/ER.6'V29HoLE/HArw'~pR-'=-AT'PP<)C,~BLEE4LJA7.row'.I/7HZR/'R57dFEPH,(.42.joF'h'EdR/ | |||
OI='IZLWS7/.C/7Va..Vm'~~...6.7/'/aRA~/ALS7R'ES5ARDiXJV'O'... | |||
SSICHArL,A7E'SL!ZJE.C 7EDl=dD~.AI.AXIAL I=NSldh/.;8<F~i-,/On)T~e'EPulcc.)~A.. | |||
FORPRaaL,e~/S:~~~IG~=28Vv'4F/v'Cc= | |||
G~(i'C.c5~~~I~~~I~ | |||
1 CHKD.BY'ATE | 1 CHKD.BY'ATE | ||
'aCl2OPRES~URF+ | 'aCl2OPRES~URF+RCSIOCJAL 57AF'55JSoatrlhlIglAIi)l.V>/hrrI1IW(Io0r>)uuvv~u.DtSrwdcEtNC825JB]axoo4)O | ||
Technical ReportTR-3454-1 EMNEERING SERVICESAPPEHOIX8A4-31 k | |||
lM~4aaAPPGHoIX8CBKD.BYDATc~'37ou6HNz5$jr',zA7lungSMKETNO.OF/8PRO4.NO..S'7ZHSS..AA/rr( | lM~4aaAPPGHoIX8CBKD.BYDATc~'37ou6HNz5$ | ||
jr',zA7lungSMKETNO.OF/8PRO4.NO..S'7ZHSS..AA/rr(LYS JDHx'R/ass/aA'~~~c+ZC7"/dAl | |||
.X/~.A"ZQgg.JFCPOr)PE+ | |||
eHA77"k'a~4~*):.~c;gAi.$7-RE'sS..S'/$7Rrddrroh'. | |||
zezcsS7a=-,v-a/c<+=zj | |||
.'.9ZLlh'Zgg/RZD..../& | |||
..A.'Vc=RYSPZC((=/CrrtdrtrlVCg, A&3..gg=..N=mZPAPEIr(~:Ar~'aT'ue.BENa(NCrP>-cannP~e<~/TS Z=-/'~e)';r;-r~a | |||
..rW/SA//ZrVerS.D/V=-S7m~wx/se-s/~;~~~o~g,~xua5+.///7.=-~re5/='44,Q(=~C'7RESS~Gs~..pA/&,7r",~S7.ZW~~S) i977+E.P/r7KZJL~S)ZDc5~y.~'S'r~5'5>>,-;rf( | |||
MaArr',4GqIC,G~tIgIII.'II'.'l(aIr~Icfur..CSpr4(r~~.~oQs,2ASLIMA'/f4P | |||
'IO%-4CpPl5r4(+/4-444'4A4-32 | |||
Dy4r3r3DAvm~~-/2- | Dy4r3r3DAvm~~-/2-7 CHKD.SYDATI~~/3)1D3ezDTNo.~o3E3wee.xo........Pw&AVi&c | ||
l~IIgyMOAIO~n.7CHKD.8YDATE~I'~~~SHEETNO.OF83PRC4I.NO.+D,e'i(s)7'.V..:.,'~.,G~=Gs-,Gq*~~..;.'P~=N.-Z~-Z.~GW-za.-z.aIrIIZ,g-2.6(j,-.:C~'"~\Cs-Ge)~o'I'Coe-xa.-ze,<oZ4-2.~trIOoIIGs)-zeg7<-28/AZOZ+PS)I/QI4'(t-.-~')=~(~-.-.t,-,'4cZG~=Go.PWo.-I..C)g=w'IPl7/o'cCgrlz7A...2x'=.-a...-..e.'......,..~-24Gg,i-Wo'gP~Iltog~JC~s='lt-/i-~>!+~L(isWo1~ | .;..',.:".....' | ||
~4tS BYnwva~-/~1~oxxosPvVoATs~>~>Asxsrrxo.~os~reoz.Xo.lwee=o2)e0Sy=+Z,OK5/Cowg.zSo-5'WZ.uZS2.4-7S,/27-Z/Z//2S7437.f~~82ZOZS~+C72,47~g.5-.c7S-/./Z5.7-"3-/.st'z.ezs-z.+7s'7Z7/.d8/2+./Cc4,207~Zg.d/.DC23/K-,/23/WO2.25+d5DIao-35 J'IlIC BY&OATB~/27OHKD.BY~LWDATE~ | Cg=.$4MFACE:$7)2~SS~rG.=s7-W~ssXr'~e<"w~~DwMLAMJsrzessw7-ospreyFLrvV~~0EED,oR3~I~~~aur~,RjVP~S>~Or~O.Z.~JA//VZAPADS 7ES6B'.~=)rrZ.QA.VE,~7rP~55+~A'//'lGS7PWS5a=,+Ag<DIAM=7:-7d;...Q~8'gDDED... | ||
~~~~rrfp 4t | F43&V'z8'cKA'H8".rrI~~~~~~~~~~I~r~~II~I~~~~<<I>>IE~~~<<~>>~I~~~~~~~~<<~~~~I~E~I~~<<~~~~~~~I~~~~~~<<~I~~zc=-rr-.,rcr-/<r=zrn8E'DDED r=~Avr'/57AA'=<C3r-r-C8A'C;7f-.i<re'c~F.rv0E1<.-Woa(~/-~-~)Ki,"..=r'z.(E'OFo)s(o:.'-G)EA4-33 S | ||
l~IIgyMOAIO~n.7CHKD.8YDATE~I'~~~SHEETNO.OF83PRC4I.NO.+D,e'i(s)7'.V..:., | |||
'~.,G~=Gs-,Gq*~~..;.'P~=N.-Z~-Z.~GW-za.-z.aIrIIZ,g-2.6(j,-.:C~'"~\Cs-Ge)~o'I'Coe-xa.-ze,<oZ4-2.~trIOoIIGs)-zeg7<-28/AZOZ+PS)I/QI4'(t-.-~')=~(~-.-.t,-,'4cZG~=Go.PWo.-I..C)g=w'IPl7/o'cCgrlz7A...2x'=.-a...-..e.'......, | |||
..~-24Gg,i-Wo'gP~Iltog~JC~s='lt-/i-~>!+~L(isWo1~ | |||
~4tS BYnwva~-/~1~oxxosPvVoATs~>~> | |||
Asxsrrxo.~os~reoz.Xo.lwee=o2)e0Sy=+Z,OK5/Cowg.zSo-5'WZ.uZS2.4-7S,/27-Z/Z//2S7437.f~~82ZOZS~+C72,47~g.5-.c7S-/./Z5.7-"3-/.st'z.ezs-z.+7s'7Z7/.d8/2+./Cc4,207~Zg.d/.DC23/K-,/23/WO2.25+d5DIao-35 J'IlIC BY&OATB~/27OHKD.BY~LWDATE~O SHZH'O.OPPROJ.NO.C/$E'ZFORO.25',O.Z5D.55//25~025''4T5.Z./ZZ.0'7.9SZ,+g7ZS75.Z.C2584-75g~Z..32K-./ZKI/g-IDZ5-/.47E.943'c//72-o.7Dg78d.5/3d.Z07l3/Gs((G,)G~/~IC(C~+Oj/)OY//i4c3/~270J/.ZZC.7D,z7C//C3'4.z87.35277/a~//"330~47o8/<~28B/z.7S.Z~Z~7P7dg903.30+A4-36 4 | |||
~~~~rrfp 4t Technical ReportTR-3454-1 I~~<iceENGINEERING SERVlCESAPPfHOIXC | |||
~I | ~I | ||
~'~ICNlm.BY~EATE~Er+Fg//+c7-or=Ap/or/E'D87RESSYwararvontEf~'M9tea~g~n~~~~~APPEHD/gSHEETHO,PROP.NO.IOF~~~CASE'-l'':.:.'.. | ~'~ICNlm.BY~EATE~Er+ | ||
Fg//+c7-or=Ap/or/E'D87RESSYwararvontEf~'M9tea~g~n~~~~~APPEHD/gSHEETHO,PROP.NO.IOF~~~CASE'-l'':.:.'..Z K~'~'2.cb=-0'~~g~/g~/0.3~I~4-45'0877/80.35'7ZO.....'....30I~5.~Z'.':..833/o7//.c9/.al'...'..l | |||
..'o.Z.:.::.;,.5'.5'8 | |||
~8'87/o/0//C"-/:/p.rr-.:-:/Z~O/ZS3~I(~-"l)O,p~I~/34;...2S~I7(F~<<O)lIESy=84.s4-8/~/3S77-/O9yn/-Izs8Vg~/.ada'"I<<j/cD/3+.i/'r43ZS.'Z.'.:/-/7/Z74/oZ'...'."Z:as+,,/o3~/'oOD7+Ig~rIr/6IJI+= | |||
Technical ReportTR-3454-1 APPcHOIX0 | |||
)i | )i | ||
/g~~/ePgsglfPg.cl<herr~9fZ~~g/~C/o~~~~sm~~~/~g.'8';Zo(tn)CJPPCcPlnC'ICHOCCJCACAO+/(+~2CQc~vesJ'qre,sgv<Jze~~~~./.h..P4.~lowe'H/eZru~+/c"~C'af2'grVCkcc~c.I-4->~i@ig..M+.Crj.vJf ICi Iksmhsss4smEsss'EEs~r"IBYc~~DATE~V'5( | /g~~/ePgsglfPg.cl<herr | ||
~9fZ~~g/~C/o~~~~sm~~~/~g.'8';Zo(tn)CJPPCcPlnC'ICHOCCJCACAO+/(+~2CQc~vesJ'qre,sgv<Jze~~~~./.h..P4.~lowe'H/eZru~+/c"~C'af2'grVCkcc~c.I-4->~i@ig..M+.Crj.vJf ICi Iksmhsss4smEsss' EEs~r"IBYc~~DATE~V'5(LJ I.'CEKD.BYMMDATE~> | |||
SHAK'O.ZDPZOLWQ.C4~//c~c(j~)><X'Mumf'4uw~/i@&QCr~irap/"9r'~jIrJiAjagre'<CO~u/Cr~YDYrli~sjdgP/<rVQJJC~' | |||
y/Y"~~/C"~r~--G2~(/)~(~)~sugg(Z)>~C'~/eIjld<2>~oJ~ICIc.gPQJTtTsCA&Is+~4i~ccpv)(~~A4-42 | |||
,fe'YoaTE~<<~iC4KD.ET@+DATE~SSHEETHD.DS~PROJ.No,g~=O,Q3'~g(goo)7heij7VwC/cd8(0wghv)+rCJJE'geA4-43 a | ,fe'YoaTE~<<~iC4KD.ET@+DATE~SSHEETHD.DS~PROJ.No,g~=O,Q3'~g(goo)7heij7VwC/cd8(0wghv)+rCJJE'geA4-43 a | ||
ATTACHMENT 3SCOPEOFULTRASONIC EXAMINATIONS OFTHEREACTORPRESSUREVESSELWELDS r~~VI~1 Thefollowing isalistingofmechanized ultrasonic ezaminations ofthereactorpressurevesselweldsandadjacentpipingwelds.Theseexaminations willinclude1/2Tbasematerialforvesselweldsand1/4inchbasematerialforpipingwelds.Alsoshownaretheanticipated ezamination anglesandthedirection ofthebeamcomponent. | |||
Thelowerheadisforgedandhasnomeridional weldsandtheshellcoursesareringsectionswithnolongitudinal welds.Inallcasesthegoalistoexamine100%oftheweldplus1/2Teachsideoftheweld.Examination of100%oftheweldlengthisthegoalalsoforthecircumferential vesselweldseventhough74/S75SectionXIonlyrequires5%.Interference fromothervesselcomponents maylimitthedesiredezamination coverage. | |||
Ifthiswasthecaseinpreviousezaminations, ithasbeennoted.Acompletediscussion oftheindividual ezamination areacoveragewiQbeprovidedinthefinalreportoftheezaminations asrequiredbyRegulatory Guide1.150Rev.l.MechUTexaminations willbeperformed onthereactorvesselweldsandselectedreactorcoolantpipingweldsfromtheinsidesurfaceutilizing thePaRISI-2DeviceandSwHIFastPaRequipment. | |||
Ezamination areasincludevesselcircumferential, nozzle-to-shell, andnozzlepipingwelds.TheMechUTezaminations oftheRPVwillbeperformed inaccordance withtherequirements ofthe74/S75SectionXIandReydatory Guide1.150,Rev.1.Na)"RPVShellandHeadAVelds1)0-degreelongitudinal wave(UTOL)examinations willbeperformed fordetection oflaminarreQectors whichmightaffectinterpretation ofangle-beam results.2)0-degreelongitudinal wave(UTOKV)ezaminations willalsobeperformed fordetection ofreflectors intheweldandbasematerial. | |||
3)45-degree and60-de~eeshearwave(UT45andUT60)ezaminations willbeperformed fordetection ofreflectors intheweldandbasematerialorientedparalleltotheweld.4)45-degree and60-degree transverse shearwave(UT45TandUT60T)ezaminations willbeperformed fordetection ofreflectors intheweldandbasematerialorientedtransverse totheweld.5)InthecaseoftheRPVwelds,SwRI50/70tandemsearchunitsv%beusedtoezaminetoadepthofapproximately 2.25inchesfordetection ofreQectors intheclad-to-base metalinterface areaandalsointhevolumebetweentheexamination surfaceandthedepthofthefirstCodecalibration reQector. | |||
Thesedual-element tandemsearchunitsdevelopaninteractive beamwithlongitudinal | |||
'wavepropagation andproduceanezamination withsignificantly improvedsignal-to-noise ratiooverconventional near-surface techniques. | |||
CIt,rF~ | CIt,rF~ | ||
b)RPVNozzleAreasTheinlet,outlet, | b)RPVNozzleAreasTheinlet,outlet,andsafetyinjection nozzle-to-vessel weldswillbeexaminedfromtheboreutilizing 15-degree (forinletnozzles), | ||
~~D.UppersheH-to- | 10degree(foroutletnozzles)10-degree (forsafetyinjection nozzle)and45-degree beamsfordetection ofreQectors intheweldandbasematerial. | ||
IV.Nozzleinnerradius, | Inaddition, UT45TandUT60Tezaminations willbeperformed fromtheshellinsidesurfacefordetection ofreQectors orientedtransverse totheweldandbasematerial. | ||
Thesetransverse examinations vrillutilizeacomputertocontroltheX-Y-Zmovements ofthePaR.devicetoassureaccuratepositioning aroundthenozzleduringezaminations. | |||
50/70tandemsearchunitswiHbeutilizedfromtheboreandshellinsidesurfacesfordetection ofreflectors locatedintheclad-to-base metalinterface regionandalsothevolumebetweentheexamination surfaceendtheQrstCodecalibration reQectorforthepurposeofsatisfying therequirements inSectionXI.c)PipingWeldsNozzlePiinWeldsFortheinletsafeend-to-nozzle welds,aUTOLscanwillbeusedfordetection ofreQectors whichmightaffectinterpretation oftheangle-beam results.UT45andUT60scanswillbeusedfordetection ofreQectors paralleltotheweldfrombothsidesoftheweld.AUT45Tscanwillbeusedfordetection ofreflectors orientedtransverse totheweld.Theacousticproperties oftheinletelbowsprecludeezamination fromtheelbowside;therefore, aUTOWscanwillbeperformed inadditiontothescansidentifled above.Limitations areexpectedaroundthevesselsupportlugs,safetyinjection andinletnozzlesduetotheproximity ofthesecomponents. | |||
Otherlimitations arelisted.I.Circumferential weldsEstimated time-(2.5shifts)Ringfory'ng-to-lower headweld(RPV-E)Ezamination area0-3600-360Angle0,45,60,50/70 0,45T,60T,50/70T BeamComponent up/dnmv/cdLowersheD-to-ring forgingweld(RPV-D)Ezamination area0-3600-360Angle0,45,60,50/70 0,45T,60T,50/70T BeamComponent up/dncw/ccwLimitations duetoprozimity ofcoresupportlugs@0from(344.20-15.90)CG-190from(74.20-105.80)CG-2180from(164.20-195.80)CG-3270from(255.25-284.75)CGAIntermediate sheD-to-lower shellweld(RPV-C)Ezamination area0-3600-360Angle0,45,60,50/70 0,45T,60T,50/70T BeamComponent up/dnmv/cd 1~h~t | |||
~~D.UppersheH-to-intermediate shellweld(RPV-B)Examination area0-3600-360Angle0,45,60,50/70 0,45T,60T,50/70T BeamComponent up/dncw/ccwII.Uppershellregionarea(A)A.Flange-to-upper shellweld(RPV-A)fromshellEstimated time-(3.0Shifts)Examination area0-3600-360Angle0,45,60,50/70 0,45T,60T,50/70T BeamComponent upcw/cdB.Outletnozzle-to-shell welds(N1A),(NlB)fromshellExamination areanozzle(0-360)Angle0,45T,GOT,50/70T BeamComponent nv/cdC.Inletnozzle-to-shell welds(N2A),(N2H)fromshellExamination areanozzle(0-360)Angle0,45T,GOT,50/70T BeamComponent cw/cdD.Safetyinjection nozzle-to-shell weld(AC-1002), | |||
(AC-1003) fromshellExamination areanozzle(0-360)Angle0,45T,60T,50/70T BeamComponent av/cdIII.Uppershellrey'onarea(B)A.Flange-to-upper shellweld(RPV-A)fromsealsurfaceEstimated Time-(1.5shifts)Examination area0-360B.Vesselsupportlugs'mmination areaVesselsupport(RPV-VSL-1) | |||
Vesselsupport(RPV-VSL-1) | |||
Vesselsupport(RPV-VSL-2) | |||
Vesselsupport(RPV-VSL-2) | |||
Angle18,11,4Angle0,45,60,50/70 0,45T,60T,50/70T 0,45,60,50/70 0,45T,60T,50/70T BeamComponent dnBeamComponent up/dnnv/cdup/dncw/ca,vA1-3 I~wJ'I~~ | |||
IV.Nozzleinnerradius,integralmentionandnozzleboreEstimated time-(3.5shifts)~7~~rA.Outletnozzleinnerradiussectionintegralextension regionandnozzlebore.B.Examination areaOutletA(N1A-IRS) | |||
OutletB(NlB-IRS) | |||
OutletA(N1A-IE)OutletB(N1B-IE)InletnozzleinsideradiusregionExamination areaInletA(N2A-IRS) | |||
InletB(N2B-IRS) | |||
Angle10,45,50/70 10,45,50/70 50/7050/70Angle50/70-50/70BeamComponent ToVesselC/Lcw/ccwToVesselC/Lcw/cmvToVesselC/LToVesselC/LBeamComponent cw/cmvcw/cdC.Nozzle-to-sheD weldsfromnozzleboreExamination areaInletA(N2A)InletB(N2B)Angle15,45,50/70 15,45,50/70 BeamComponent ToVesselC/Lnv/cdToVesselC/Lzv/ccwD.Safetyinjection insideradiusregionandnozzleboreEmmination areaSafetyinjection A(ACr1003-IRS) | |||
Safetyinjection B(AC-1002-IRS) | |||
Angle0,100,10BeamComponent ToVesselC/LToVesselC/LSafetyinjection nozzleintegralnxensionEzamination areaAngleSafetyinjection A{AC-1003-IE) 70Safetyinjection B{AC-1002-IE) 70BeamComponent AvWvV.Nozzle-to-piping weldsElbow-toinletnozzleweldsEstimated Time-(3.5Shifts)Ezamination areaInletA(PL-FW-V) | |||
InletB(PL-PV-VII) | |||
InletA(PL-FKV-V) | |||
InletB(PL-FW-VII) | |||
InletA(PL-FW-V) | |||
InletB(PL-FW-VII) | |||
Angle0,45,600,45,6045RLT45RLT45RL45RLBeamComponent AwayfromVesselC/LAwayfromVesselC/Lnv/cdcw/cnvToVesselC/LToVesselC/L 4~I~t B.Nozzle-to pipingweldsExamination areaOutletA(PIPW-II)OutletA(PL-FW-Il) | |||
OutletB(PL-FiV-IV) | |||
OutletB(PIFW-IV)C.Safeend-to-nozzle weldsExamination areaSafetyinjection A(AC-1003-1) | |||
Safetyinjection A(AC-1003-1) | |||
Safetyinjection B(AC-1002-1) | |||
Safetyinjection B(AC-1002-1) | |||
D.Piping-to-safe endweldsExamination areaSafetyinjection'A(AC-1003-2) | |||
Safetyinjection A(AC-1003-2) | |||
Safetyinjection B(AC-1002-2) | |||
Safetyinjection B(AC-1002-2) | |||
Angle0,45,60,45T,60 0,45,60,45T,60 0,45,60,45T,60 0,45>60,45T,60 Angle0,45,45T,60 0,45,45T,60 0,45,45T,60 0,45,45T,60 Angle0,45,45T,60 0745,45T,60 0,45,45T,60 0,45,45T,60 BeamComponent AwayfromVesselC/LToVesselC/LAwayfromVesselC/LToVesselC/LBeamComponent AwayfromVesselC/LToVesselC/LAwayfromVesselC/LToVesselC/LBeamComponent AwayfromVesselC/LToVesselC/LAwayfromVesselC/LToVesselC/L | |||
SCHEDULEOFMECHANIZED EXAMINATIONS FORR.E.GIHHARPVanination AreasCircunferential | |||
'LleldsRPV-E,D,C,-BDay1Day22[12Day3Day412I--I-Day5Day6Day7I12I--I-DaysOn~==Vessel (c="-Crew ShiftUpperShellRegionAreaMelds(A)RPV-A,H1A,N18,H2A,HZB,AC-1002,&AC.1003UpperShellRegionAreaWelds(8)RPV-VSL1) | |||
RPV-VSL2( | |||
&RPV-AAC1002PipingMeldsElbowcoInletNozzleAPL-FM.V8PLFM;VIIOutletNozzletoPipeAPL-FN-II8PL-FM-IVSISafeEndtoNozzleAAC-1003-1 8AC-10021SIPipetoSafeEndAAC.1003.2 8AC-1002.2 NozzleInsideRadiusSectionsandIntegralExtension OutletA(H1A-IRS,- | |||
IE)Outlet8(N18-IRS,-IE) | |||
InletA(H2A-IRS) | |||
Inlet8(H28-IRS) | |||
Safetyinjection AC.1003.IRS,-IE IRS,-IE----X | |||
$~'1 | $~'1 | ||
'~~~tIII1~'~~I~t~'tII | '~~~tIII1~'~~I~t~'tII | ||
~005~8S~I>I~~IQ')I0P 7%~i NlAOUTi~iNOZZi~A2830'OZZLETO~SELWELD(mICAL)VESSELSUPPORTVSL-1eBB-30' | ~005~8S~I>I~~IQ')I0P 7%~i NlAOUTi~iNOZZi~A2830'OZZLETO~SELWELD(mICAL)VESSELSUPPORTVSL-1eBB-30'0 II2~e.iINJECTION NOc~'=AC-'I00310830'OOPAN29,Wl::NOZZ'"S14830'2AINI:-iNOZZ'A32830'UPPOrc iPAD-/~/I//-/)2/0AC-IGD2ACiGG22880'OOPBVSi-2~2"830'80IIIIIIIIIIIaaa.lWCZ.'IDC'1~~II'OSHO.REACTORPRESSUREYc=SELGDfFAROC..~~~~~~C--R05i~cNB< | ||
TURK fT1 ATTACHMENT 4NOZZLEFLAWSIZXNGPROGRAM(FOCUSEDTRANSDUCER DEVELOPMENT) 4}} |
Revision as of 11:10, 29 June 2018
ML17309A416 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Ginna ![]() |
Issue date: | 03/15/1979 |
From: | TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML17261A806 | List: |
References | |
TR-3454-1, NUDOCS 8901100417 | |
Download: ML17309A416 (108) | |
Text
ATELEDYNEENGINE="RING SFRVICFS7mCi-j>j)C~A~
RE~OP7TR-3454-1 ASMESECT)ONX)FRACTUREhlECHANlCSEVALUAT)ON OFlNLETNOZZ~MINSERV)CP.
NSPEC~.)ON.INDICAT)QNR.E.GINNAUNITNO.1REACTORVESSELMARCH151979
't ROCHESTER GASll(ELECTRICCORPORATIOi'l 89EASTAVENUEROCHESTER, NY14649R.E.GIf'lilAUNITNO.1REACTORVESSELTECHNICAL REPORTTR-3454-1 ASHESECTIOf'l XIFRACTUREHECHANICS EVALUATION OFINLETNOZZLEINSERVICE
.Ii'lSPECTIOi'l IffDICATIOff i~1ARCH1",1979)iiTELEDYNEENGli4E=~lNG SERViCES303BEARHILLROAD'P/ALTHAiYi, MASSACHUSETTS 02154
TABLEOFCONTENTSABSTRACT
1.0INTRODUCTION
2.0CONCLUSION
3.0 DESCRIPTION
OFVESSELANDREPORTEDFLAW4.0COMPARISON OFGINNA-1REPORTEDFLAWWITHPREYIOUSLY EVALUATED FLAWS5.0MATERIALPROPERTIES 6.07.08.0PRESSURE-TEMPERATURE LIMITSSTRESSANALYSiSFATIGUECRACKGROWTH9.0FRACTUREMECHANICS ANALYSISANDCRITERIA10.0ELASTIC-PLASTi'CANALYSISAPPENDICES A.STRESSANALYSISB.EF"=CTOFFLAWSiZEANDTOUGHNESS VARIATiONS C.E"FFECTOFAPPLIEDSTRESSVARIATiONS D.ELASTiC-PLASTICEVALUATION A4-3
ENG',NEWlRG SERVICESABSTRACTITheInservice Inspection indication ofanearmid-wallflawinthereactorpressurevesselinletnozzleN2hasbeenevaluated inaccordance withtherequirements ofSectionXIoftheASHEBoilerandPressureVesselCode.Thereportedflawsatisfies theCodecriteriaforacceptance byeval-uation.Therefore, atleastwithrespecttothisindication, thevessel.isacceptable forserviceasiswithoutremovalorrepairoftheindication.
\1.0INTRODUCTIOH R.E.G>nnaUnitHo.1isaWestinghouse PWRwhichwentintocommercial serviceinJune,1970.Thereactorpressurevessel,constructed bytheBabcock6Wilcox.Companywas.subjected toanInservice Inspection inaccordance withTechnical Specification andSectionXIoftheASHEBoilerandPressureVesselCoderequirements.
Whencertainalleviating factorsarenotconsidered, anultrasonic indication inexcessofthesizepermitted foracceptance byexamination wasidentified intheweldwhichattachedaninletnozzletothevessel.Insupportofotherapproaches beingfollowedbyRochester GasandElectricpersonnel,.
TeledyneEngineering Services(TES)wasrequested to,eval-uatethereportedindication inaccordance withtheSectionXIrequirements foracceptance byevaluation.
Thisreportcontainstheresultsofthatin-.vestigations~
A4-5
Z.OCONCLUSIONS 2.1Thereportedflawsatisfies theCodecriteriaforacceptance byevaluation, soisacceptable forserviceasiswithoutremoval~~orrepairoftheindication.
2.2Forthereportedflaw,ofdimensions:
Through-wall depth=2a=0.93inchesLenth=I=5.3inchesEccentricity
=e=1.0inches,thecalculated stressintensity factoris9.2ksi~in.TheCodeacceptable valueis63.2ksi/in.Therefore, thetotalfactorofi21.7ascornaredtothecoderequiredfactorofsafetyof~10:3.16.2.3Theeffectofvariations inflawsizeortoughness ofthematerialcanbedetermined romFigure1.Basedupontheresultsplotte'hereon,aflawofthrough-wall dimension 2a=4.0inches,wouldsatisyCodeacceptance requirements evenifthetoughness we.oreducedzo67ksivin.Theef-"ofvariant.onsinapp1iedstressacrossthe7(awcan"edet.mined=romFigure2.Basedupontheresultsplot-.edtherein,tnerepor-dflaw,Za=0.93inches,wouldsatisfyCodeacceptance require:-;.-=.
tseveni=theappliedstressacrosstheflawwereequa;totheyieldstrengthofthematerial, or51<si,whichever islower.Statddifferently, thecalculatdpressuresLressactiingacrosstheflawcouldbeincreased byafactorinexcessof6wi-;nouiviolation oftheCodecriteria.
2.5Anelastic-plastic fracturemechanics
- analysis, following themethodsappliedbyDr.P.C.Parisasaconsultant toNRCtoasimilarinvestigation indicated that:a.Thefactorofsafetyagainstplasticinstability failureisinexcessof3foraflawthrough-wall dimension inexcessof2a=4inches.b.Foraflawthrough-wall dimension inexcessof2a=4inches,yieldingcanoccurandresidualstresses, suchasthosewhichresultfromweldin,'nddiscontinuity
- stresses, suchaqthosewhichresultfromterneraturedifferentials orfrompipereactionstresses, wouldbeeliminated fromconsideration.
Althoughthisevaluation resultsintheconclusion thatsuchstressesmaybeignored,suchstresseswereconsidered intheevaluations whichleadtothepreviously listedconclusions.
2.6ThepreviousMCAP-8503 ASHEIII,AppendixGanalysiswasreviewedtodetermine ifthepressureofthereportedflawrequiresare-e!aluat:on oftheAppendixGrequirements.
Itisaconclusion ofthisreviewthattheMestingnouse evaluation ofapostulated flawinthevicinityofanoutletnozzlerepresents amucnmoresigni-f;:cantsituation thandoesthereportedflaw.Tnerefore, accepz-abiiitofthepostulated outletnozzleflawlsfu1tnerconfirmac'.on
,oftheacceptability ofthereportedflaw.A4-7 II>>"
3.0 DESCRIPTION
OFVESSELANDREPORTEDFLAWTheGinnaUnit1ReactorPressureYesse1(RPV)wasfabricated bytheBabcock5WilcoxCompany(85W)totherequirements ofSectionIIIoftheASt<EBoilerandPressureVesselCodeinaccordance withWestinghouse ElectricCompany(W)Equip-mentSpecification Ho.676206Revision0withAddendum676554,Revision0.TheRPVStressReorts'reB8W1966,ReportsNumbers.1through12.rTheinsidediameter, totheinnersurfaceofthecladding, is132inches.Theminimumcladthickness is5/32inches.Thewallthickness is61/2inchesatthebeltlineand9inchesatthenozzlecourse.Thenozzlecoursecontainstwo521/2inchoutsidediameterinletnozzles,two49inchdiameteroutletnoz-'lesandtwonominal4inchdiametersafetyinjection nozzles.Theinletandoutletnozzlesareata-commonel'evation.
AsketchoftheinletnozzleisshowninFigure3,withthedimensions oftheweldpreparation ontheODofthenozzlesketchesabove.Thisconfigure-ion ismportantbecauseitlocatesthereportedflaw.Figure4showstheinne.por-tionofthisweldprepa.ationwiththereportedflawlyingalongthelineAC.Thereweldprparationdimensions aredefinedonaradialplanethroughthevesselcen-erline
(==0'360').Sincetheweldoreparation ismachinedcylindrcallywiththenozzlecenterline, theradialdis-ancebe-'.veen theinsideofthe.esse.and-heweldpreparation landvarieswithradialposition~.Theflawisloca-;edbe-ween305'9<316.5",approximately the10:30o'lockpositionwnenlook':ngalongthenozzlecenterline fromoutsideofthevessel.Figure4indicates
- ~eradialdistancefromtheRPVIDtoPointDasvaryingbetween4.2and..1inches.Thereportedflaw"through-wall"dimension measuredalongtheweldprepa.ation is0.93inches.Forpurposesofanalysis, SectionXIpermitsthisflawtobre-olvedintoa"throuah-wall" dimension measuredperpendicular tothevess'elsur-facewhichwoulddecreasethe2adimension, Becauseofthecomplexgeometry, advantage isnottakenofthisfactor.Theflawlength,measuredaroundthecir-cumVerence oftheweldpreparation asthedistancebetween305'nd316.5's5.27 ENG)NEER)NG SERVtCESinches.SectionXIdefinestheflaweccentricity asthedistancebetween.theflawcenterandthevesselmidplane.
ThedistancefromthevesselIDtotheflawcentervariesbetweenapproximately 3.55and4.47inches.Conservatively neglecting theincreased thickness resulting fromtheouternozzlecornerradius,therefore takingthetotalthickness as9inches;theeccentrici tyvariesbetweenapproximately 0and1".8asedupontheabovediscussion, andnotingthatanincreaseineccentricity increases thecalculated stressintensity factor,theflawisdefinedforpur-posesofanalysisbythedimensions:
pa=0.93inches1=5.3inchese=1.0inch Ilay AENGINEERING SERVICES4.0COMPARISON OFGINNA-1REPORTEDFLAWWITHPREVIOUSLY EVALUATED FLAWSForpurposesofexamining pressure-temperature limitations, WCAP-8503*
considered theeffectsofaflawadjacenttotheoutletnozzle.Althoughthere~$Naredifferences ingeometrybetweentheinletandoutletnozzles,thestressesareverysimilar.Thisevaluation considered asurfaceflawinaplanepassingthroughtheRPVcenterline ofdepthequalto1.8inches{a/t=0.20)andsurfacelengthof1,8inches{aspectratioof1:6).Sinceasurfaceflawof'givenlengthanddepthresultsinapproximately thesamestressintensity factorasdoesasubsurface.
flawofthesamelengthandtwicethethrough-wall dimension, theWCAP-8503 evaluation isequivalent tothaiwhichwouldbeobtainedforamid-wallflawof2a=3.6and1=10.8inthesameorientation...In fact,theWCAPevalu-'Iationwouldbeveryconservative becausethesurfaceissubject,todiscontinuity stresseswhichhavebutlittleeffectnearmidplane.
Ofevenmoreimportance, however,isthediffe.enceinorientation betweenthetwoflaws.Theindicated Ginnaflawiscircumferential tothenozzleandtheWCAPflawisradialtothenozzle;therefore, thepressurestressnormaltotheWCAPflawisaboutthretimesaslargeast.atnormaltotheGinnaindication.
The.efore,theindic'tdGinnaflawisofconsiderable lesssignificance thanthenozzleflawusedfortheAppendixGevaluation ofiheGinnavesselThemid-wall, nozzleattachment weldflawmostsimilartothatindicesdinGinna-1whichhasbeensubjected toextensveinvestigation byTESandbythe*HRCistheindication inthePilgrim-1 recirculation inletnozzleNZBwhichwasfirstdetec.edin1974andwnichwasreevaluated in1976bybothTESandHRC.Thesignificant parameters maybecomparedasfollows,usingthePilgrimvaluesevaluated byTES:ttWCAP-8'03, "ASMEIII,AppendixGAnalysisofRochester GashElectricCorporation R.E.GinnaUnitHo.1ReactorVessel,July1975.
AFEi~jNEER)NG SERVICESPlant:Depth,2a,in.Length,1,in.Eccentricity, e,in..Hoopstressinvessel,ksi(atoperating pressure)
Yessejthickness 6irma-I0.935.31.016.59.05.2~PI'Irim-11,55.20.5516.27.010.7TheNRCevaluation assumedsomewhatmoreconservative parameters.
SoththeTESandHRCevajuations concluded thawthePilgrim-1 RPYwassatisfactory iorcontinued service.Tnecalculated stressntensiy=actorsforGInna-1woutdbeexpectedtobemuchsmallerthanthosecomputed=orPilgrim-l.
Sasedupontheseiwocomparisons withpreviously evaluated flaws,onewouidjudgethaitheGinna-1vesselwouldeasilysatisfytheSectionXlcriria=oracceptance byevaluation.
A4-11 t'jIt,KIr
5.0 HATERIALPROPERTIES
4~~BaseduponthevaluespublishedinWCAP-8421*,
-theunirradiatedmateria1properties ofthenozzle,usingoutletnozzledata,andoftheweld,usingbeltlinewelddata,areasfollows:LocationRTNDTCyShelf,ft-1bNozzleWeld0.090.236001258018Thecomputedend-of-life fluenceatthenozzleelevation is1.08(IO)atone-quarter thickness.
UsingRegulatory Guide'l.99,Revision1,theend-of-lifeproperties arecomputedas:LocationNDT',fShelf,ft-lbNozzleWeld607011262!I,inWCAP-8503 hasusedanuppershelfKl=200ksi~n.IRTheSect-ionXItoughness versustemoerature curvesareplottedinFigure=foranend-of-life RTi'=70F.sUl"'iCAP-8421, AnalysisofCapsuleRFromtheRochester GasandlectricCorporation R.:.GinnaUnitNo.1ReactorilesselRadiation Surveillance Program,November, 1974.
I 6.0PRESSURE-TEMPERATURE LIMITSTheupperlimitoftheTechnical Specification heatupand.cooldowncurvesarealsoplottedonFigure5.Becausetheselimitsarecontrolled bythe.higherfluencebeltlineregion,full'operating
- pressure, ZZSOpsig,isnotpermitted below315F.Thistemperature isonthetoughness uppershelfbyamargininexcessof100F.,
)>TELEDYNEENGINEERING SERVICES7.0STRESSANALYSISThesignificant stressesactingacrosstheflawindication arethoseduetovesselpressureandduetoweldingresidualstresses.
Atthenearmid-walllocation, thermalstressesandstressesresulting frompipereactioneffectsarenegligible.
Thepressurestressesofinterestarethoseactinginaradialdirectionwithrespecttothenozzle.Inthemainshellcourseawayfromthenozzle,theoperating pressureof2250psigcausesahoopstressequalto16.5ksiandanaxialstressequalto8.3ksi.Thepresenceofthenozzlereducestheradialstress,sineataradiusequaltothenozzleboreradiusthestressesmustbeequalto-2,3ksi,Iwhere'the negativesignindicates compression.
Inthecourseofevaluating similarflawsinothervessels,averysimplestresscalculation technique wasfoundtogiveexcellent answersforthepressurmemoranestressacrosstheflaw.Specifically, thevaluesobtainedwiththsim-oleapproximation maybecomparedtoothersolutions asfollows:!!ethodSimp1eapproximat-:.on30finiteelement08C8.710.3membraneinnersurfacemid-walloutersurface20axisymmetric model,doubled7.7innerwall10.0mid-wailThi5slmpleapproximat ionisusedinthisevaluation.inordertoobtainthepressurestressactingnormaltotheF')aw,ascontained inAooendix.A.
><TELEDYNEEiNGIREERNG SERVICESTheresidualstressesusedinthisevaluation areaconservative approximation tothosemeasuredinaheavyweldmentafterpost-weld heattreatment*.
Thesedataindicatethattheresidualstrsssesvarythroughthethickness withacosinerelationship from8.0ksitensileonthesurfacesto8.0ksicompression atmid-wall.Despiteconiirmation ofthepresenceofcompressive residualstressesatmidwallbyremovalofasimilarflawtotheoneunderconsideration inaRP'J.Hocreditistakenforthesecompressive stressesinthisanalysis.
Instead,theresidualstressesareconsidered tovaryasacosinefunctionthroughthethickness with8.0ksitensileonthesurfacesto0ksiatthecenter.Previousevaluation ofarecirculation inletnozzleinaBtlR,whichissub-jectedtolargertemperature changesthanisthesubjectPHRinletnozzle,indi-catesthatthermalstressesarenotsignificant aslongastheflawdoesnotapproachwithinabout11/2"fromtheinnersurface,Thisistrueduringnormalandabnormaloperations becausetheinletnozzleandtheadjacentvesselaresuojected tothesametemperature transient andaresimilarinthickness.
Tnere-fore,thermalstresseffectsarenotconsidered tobeofimportance intherangeoiilawsizesconsidered, 2a<4inches.Pipereactionstressesiniheweldregionareprimarily bendingstressesvaryingiromtensileaionesurfacetocompressive attheother.Sincethere-sortedilawoiinte.estisnearmid-wall, pipereactionstressesacrossthetaware'.'nsignificant.
Asaresultoithisdiscussion, theonlystressesusedinthefracturemechanics analysisofAopendix8arethosewhichresultfrominternalpressureandtheweldr'esidual stresses.
Sincetheresulting stressintensity factorisverylow,aquestionoftenarisesastotheconsequences ofanerrorinthecal-culatedstress.Forthisreason,anadditional evaluation, AppendixC,ismadefortheindicated flawdimensions givingthestressintensity factorwhichwouldbe'computod forarbitrary valuesoimembranestressactingacrosstheflaw.D..'.Ferr'.'(1 P."".~uhlandD.R.l1iller,".'4easurement o7Residua1Stressesina"e'6e'lT.qsr';te'd.,'na
~pumaIResea,cnUDDlemenr.,
tlovemoer i"coA4-15
)<TELEDYNEZG;XEERIXG SERVICESWithrespecttoFaultedConditions, theinletnozzleprovidesthepathforinjection flowforabout40minutesfollowing aLOCA.Forthefirst20secondstheflowisfromthesafetyinjection accumulators atatemperature of90'F.Atthattimethesafetyinjection pumpsarestartedanddeliver155Ffluidfromtheboricacidtanks.At140secondsfollowing LOCAinitiation theflowtrans-ferstotherefueling waterstoragetankandthewatertemperature dropsto'60F.Attheendof40minutesflowswitchestothecontainment dumpandflowisataminimumof140F,Thereactorpressuredropstonearzeroimmediately following aLOCA.TheotherFaultedCondition ofconcernisaLargeSteamline BreakAccidenl(LSBA).Following aLSBAthereactorcoolanttemperature endpressurerapidlydecreases.
Whenthepressuredescreases below1450psig,flowfromtheboricacidstoragetanksentersthevesselat155F.Safetyinjection terminates tenminutesaftertheLSBA.Flowduringtheseeventsisthroughtheinletnozzleanddownthevessel.Becausethenozzleandvesselareofaboutthesamethickness, butsmallthe.maldiscontinuity stressesresult.Analysisofsimilartransient inothernozzlesindicates thermalstressesacrosstheweldoflessthan5ksi.Sincethepressurenasdecreased, thetotalstressintensity factor,fortheFaultedCondition is,smallerthanthatcalculated duringnormaloperation.
Therefore, postulatee sur-facflawsinthevesselbeltlineregionaremorelimitingthanisthereportednozzleweldflaw.A4-16 Cll~J' Ei~tNEERIRG SERY}CES8.0FATIGUECRACKGROWTHBecauseoftheoperating characteristics ofaPWR,theinletnozzletemperature variations withinthepowerrangearenegligible.
Evenwhencoolanttemperature
'changesdooccur,thenozzleandvesselrespondsimilarly inthatthermaldiscontinuity stressesarenegligibl'e inthevicinityofthereportedflaw.Skin-type thermalstressesmaybesignificant atandneartheinnersurfaces, butnotinthevicinityofthereportedflaw.Therefore theonlycycleofimportance togrowthofthereportedflawispressurization anddepressurization.
ForthereportedFlaw,theaKforpres-.surization to2500'psig,thedesignpressure, isonly8.7ksi.An.Forasubsurface flaw,FigureA-4300-1predictsafatiguecrackgrowthrateof8(10)in/cycleforpressurization to2500psig.Therefore nofatiguecrackgrowthispredicted.
l EiMNEERjl4GSERVCES9.0FRACTUREMECHANICS ANALYSISANDCRITERIAThelinearelasticfracturemechanics methodsofAppendixA,SectionXIoftheASMECodeareused.Thesemethodsareconservative, butarenotoverlyconservative intheabsenceofsteepstressgradients asisthecaseinthissolution.
Theacceptance criteriausedarethosebasedonappliedstressintensity factorascontained intheSummer1978AddendatoSectionXIoftheASMECode,IWB-3612.
Thesecriteriaareidentical tothoseusedinthePilgrim-1 evalu-ation,althoughatthattimethecriteriawerereferenced toaJunell,1974letterfromASMEtoBostonEdison.
10.0ELASTIC-PLASTICA!HALYSIS Attachment 4tothe!'(RCStaffEvaluation ofthe1976Pilgrim-1 ISIresults,datedApril21,1976,summarizes anelastic-plastic FractureMechanics Analysisperformed byOr.P.C.Parisasaconsultant toNRC.AppendixOtothisreportcontainsanelastic-plastic analysisapplicable totheGinna-1situation whichfollowsParis'lternative secondary stresscomputation method.Alsoconsidered isthemaximumilawsizewhichwouldresultinretention ofafactorofsafetyofburstofatleast,three.Thisanalysisi.ndicates thataflawthrough-wall (2a)dimension inexcssof4inchesisrequiredto'reducethefactorofsafetybelow3.0,usingananalysiswhichassumesaverylongflaw.Inaddition,thisanalysisshowsthatanyresidualorsecondary stresseswnicharepresentinthestructure willbeeliminated byyieldingaslongastheflawdepth(2a),islessthananu;.-be.inexcessof4".Thatis,weldresidualstresses, thermalstressesandpipereactionstressesneednotbeconside.edinevaluating thevesse!saic-yif2a<4inches.
41 Ie[1
I=Jqo~EZ79~svG~oatm-'HKD.ETDATE~ITr~FI--"ct'l=
Wre<iegTfcc3gAJIATIoNS SHETHO.OFFEOAEO.-'4<~70~~I~~~:.I..:IIII~r~I~~It~'r'I...L......~rI/+orox~\0~~~~I~rI304Jr~<<~~~~~204JfDt~~r~~~rI~tt~).BIO~~I4oME/v)ggAggSTRK55I...G.p~,-K's1r 1
t/6A~3.,i,.dr.is<a.->-i.(~.&(wJg(rtI7'i'g/0F~QZzS2.7qlc>3Z1ItMtM27.7eqGV3'JcPi)4l-.NP,ntylI~~Xg'.)
goz.alega~c-QP/g/6gcQfro~.pa)>g/gQo'csscIZP(~~c../cot)~~ai~vcrJwvgLccIvg8lc,I4J<c't.9io
<N.F35770"~,/%7g,(fa4.3/(~'~~~~~0~Q*~~~.,O.P~(0,.(l,>el)f0nb)Jl*Ip~/~c./5'-.9g.',
/gIID(st',4.o[2Ci'C&$,2C.s/8lS)Ic~c.~~Ie~y+jgggfvgdf<lcc~fcv~Ecld~ick;pO09s0(.:f~J>go~~3]LAL/<f7t/3.5XO.999 II
(~P~~~PN~l4 Cl Technical Report'TR-3454-1 FAG'NEE~)NG SERVICESAPPENDIXA
/71lMChD/sTANcFJA'HG5O4iYo~0tO I
0~li~p4rrPk~pJ~~
iav4Moira~Z-~~.sv~aim>>>>~SHEETNa.OFwm.xo.~~<>~~~l~~4THE'ESUL.75 ARE:.COA'SERiA 7/VEJ3ECAUS'E'HZRESTRAMieGEF'FEC75...Ok"WPE'",hlo2PiG',
RE)WFOacE-~~/V)6'iV7HAYE82ZHNE,6LEdPRESSdRE'N
.TAG...A'd'.2+4':'s&
'AS.HAsTHE'.:M"D~D.OD/ER.6'V29HoLE/HArw'~pR-'=-AT'PP<)C,~BLEE4LJA7.row'.I/7HZR/'R57dFEPH,(.42.joF'h'EdR/
OI='IZLWS7/.C/7Va..Vm'~~...6.7/'/aRA~/ALS7R'ES5ARDiXJV'O'...
SSICHArL,A7E'SL!ZJE.C 7EDl=dD~.AI.AXIAL I=NSldh/.;8<F~i-,/On)T~e'EPulcc.)~A..
FORPRaaL,e~/S:~~~IG~=28Vv'4F/v'Cc=
G~(i'C.c5~~~I~~~I~
1 CHKD.BY'ATE
'aCl2OPRES~URF+RCSIOCJAL 57AF'55JSoatrlhlIglAIi)l.V>/hrrI1IW(Io0r>)uuvv~u.DtSrwdcEtNC825JB]axoo4)O
Technical ReportTR-3454-1 EMNEERING SERVICESAPPEHOIX8A4-31 k
lM~4aaAPPGHoIX8CBKD.BYDATc~'37ou6HNz5$
jr',zA7lungSMKETNO.OF/8PRO4.NO..S'7ZHSS..AA/rr(LYS JDHx'R/ass/aA'~~~c+ZC7"/dAl
.X/~.A"ZQgg.JFCPOr)PE+
eHA77"k'a~4~*):.~c;gAi.$7-RE'sS..S'/$7Rrddrroh'.
zezcsS7a=-,v-a/c<+=zj
.'.9ZLlh'Zgg/RZD..../&
..A.'Vc=RYSPZC((=/CrrtdrtrlVCg, A&3..gg=..N=mZPAPEIr(~:Ar~'aT'ue.BENa(NCrP>-cannP~e<~/TS Z=-/'~e)';r;-r~a
..rW/SA//ZrVerS.D/V=-S7m~wx/se-s/~;~~~o~g,~xua5+.///7.=-~re5/='44,Q(=~C'7RESS~Gs~..pA/&,7r",~S7.ZW~~S) i977+E.P/r7KZJL~S)ZDc5~y.~'S'r~5'5>>,-;rf(
MaArr',4GqIC,G~tIgIII.'II'.'l(aIr~Icfur..CSpr4(r~~.~oQs,2ASLIMA'/f4P
'IO%-4CpPl5r4(+/4-444'4A4-32
Dy4r3r3DAvm~~-/2-7 CHKD.SYDATI~~/3)1D3ezDTNo.~o3E3wee.xo........Pw&AVi&c
.;..',.:".....'
Cg=.$4MFACE:$7)2~SS~rG.=s7-W~ssXr'~e<"w~~DwMLAMJsrzessw7-ospreyFLrvV~~0EED,oR3~I~~~aur~,RjVP~S>~Or~O.Z.~JA//VZAPADS 7ES6B'.~=)rrZ.QA.VE,~7rP~55+~A'//'lGS7PWS5a=,+Ag<DIAM=7:-7d;...Q~8'gDDED...
F43&V'z8'cKA'H8".rrI~~~~~~~~~~I~r~~II~I~~~~<>IE~~~<<~>>~I~~~~~~~~<<~~~~I~E~I~~<<~~~~~~~I~~~~~~<<~I~~zc=-rr-.,rcr-/<r=zrn8E'DDED r=~Avr'/57AA'=<C3r-r-C8A'C;7f-.i<re'c~F.rv0E1<.-Woa(~/-~-~)Ki,"..=r'z.(E'OFo)s(o:.'-G)EA4-33 S
l~IIgyMOAIO~n.7CHKD.8YDATE~I'~~~SHEETNO.OF83PRC4I.NO.+D,e'i(s)7'.V..:.,
'~.,G~=Gs-,Gq*~~..;.'P~=N.-Z~-Z.~GW-za.-z.aIrIIZ,g-2.6(j,-.:C~'"~\Cs-Ge)~o'I'Coe-xa.-ze,<oZ4-2.~trIOoIIGs)-zeg7<-28/AZOZ+PS)I/QI4'(t-.-~')=~(~-.-.t,-,'4cZG~=Go.PWo.-I..C)g=w'IPl7/o'cCgrlz7A...2x'=.-a...-..e.'......,
..~-24Gg,i-Wo'gP~Iltog~JC~s='lt-/i-~>!+~L(isWo1~
~4tS BYnwva~-/~1~oxxosPvVoATs~>~>
Asxsrrxo.~os~reoz.Xo.lwee=o2)e0Sy=+Z,OK5/Cowg.zSo-5'WZ.uZS2.4-7S,/27-Z/Z//2S7437.f~~82ZOZS~+C72,47~g.5-.c7S-/./Z5.7-"3-/.st'z.ezs-z.+7s'7Z7/.d8/2+./Cc4,207~Zg.d/.DC23/K-,/23/WO2.25+d5DIao-35 J'IlIC BY&OATB~/27OHKD.BY~LWDATE~O SHZH'O.OPPROJ.NO.C/$E'ZFORO.25',O.Z5D.55//25~0254T5.Z./ZZ.0'7.9SZ,+g7ZS75.Z.C2584-75g~Z..32K-./ZKI/g-IDZ5-/.47E.943'c//72-o.7Dg78d.5/3d.Z07l3/Gs((G,)G~/~IC(C~+Oj/)OY//i4c3/~270J/.ZZC.7D,z7C//C3'4.z87.35277/a~//"330~47o8/<~28B/z.7S.Z~Z~7P7dg903.30+A4-36 4
~~~~rrfp 4t Technical ReportTR-3454-1 I~~<iceENGINEERING SERVlCESAPPfHOIXC
~I
~'~ICNlm.BY~EATE~Er+
Fg//+c7-or=Ap/or/E'D87RESSYwararvontEf~'M9tea~g~n~~~~~APPEHD/gSHEETHO,PROP.NO.IOF~~~CASE'-l:.:.'..Z K~'~'2.cb=-0'~~g~/g~/0.3~I~4-45'0877/80.35'7ZO.....'....30I~5.~Z'.':..833/o7//.c9/.al'...'..l
..'o.Z.:.::.;,.5'.5'8
~8'87/o/0//C"-/:/p.rr-.:-:/Z~O/ZS3~I(~-"l)O,p~I~/34;...2S~I7(F~<<O)lIESy=84.s4-8/~/3S77-/O9yn/-Izs8Vg~/.ada'"I<<j/cD/3+.i/'r43ZS.'Z.'.:/-/7/Z74/oZ'...'."Z:as+,,/o3~/'oOD7+Ig~rIr/6IJI+=
Technical ReportTR-3454-1 APPcHOIX0
)i
/g~~/ePgsglfPg.cl<herr
~9fZ~~g/~C/o~~~~sm~~~/~g.'8';Zo(tn)CJPPCcPlnC'ICHOCCJCACAO+/(+~2CQc~vesJ'qre,sgv<Jze~~~~./.h..P4.~lowe'H/eZru~+/c"~C'af2'grVCkcc~c.I-4->~i@ig..M+.Crj.vJf ICi Iksmhsss4smEsss' EEs~r"IBYc~~DATE~V'5(LJ I.'CEKD.BYMMDATE~>
SHAK'O.ZDPZOLWQ.C4~//c~c(j~)><X'Mumf'4uw~/i@&QCr~irap/"9r'~jIrJiAjagre'<CO~u/Cr~YDYrli~sjdgP/<rVQJJC~'
y/Y"~~/C"~r~--G2~(/)~(~)~sugg(Z)>~C'~/eIjld<2>~oJ~ICIc.gPQJTtTsCA&Is+~4i~ccpv)(~~A4-42
,fe'YoaTE~<<~iC4KD.ET@+DATE~SSHEETHD.DS~PROJ.No,g~=O,Q3'~g(goo)7heij7VwC/cd8(0wghv)+rCJJE'geA4-43 a
ATTACHMENT 3SCOPEOFULTRASONIC EXAMINATIONS OFTHEREACTORPRESSUREVESSELWELDS r~~VI~1 Thefollowing isalistingofmechanized ultrasonic ezaminations ofthereactorpressurevesselweldsandadjacentpipingwelds.Theseexaminations willinclude1/2Tbasematerialforvesselweldsand1/4inchbasematerialforpipingwelds.Alsoshownaretheanticipated ezamination anglesandthedirection ofthebeamcomponent.
Thelowerheadisforgedandhasnomeridional weldsandtheshellcoursesareringsectionswithnolongitudinal welds.Inallcasesthegoalistoexamine100%oftheweldplus1/2Teachsideoftheweld.Examination of100%oftheweldlengthisthegoalalsoforthecircumferential vesselweldseventhough74/S75SectionXIonlyrequires5%.Interference fromothervesselcomponents maylimitthedesiredezamination coverage.
Ifthiswasthecaseinpreviousezaminations, ithasbeennoted.Acompletediscussion oftheindividual ezamination areacoveragewiQbeprovidedinthefinalreportoftheezaminations asrequiredbyRegulatory Guide1.150Rev.l.MechUTexaminations willbeperformed onthereactorvesselweldsandselectedreactorcoolantpipingweldsfromtheinsidesurfaceutilizing thePaRISI-2DeviceandSwHIFastPaRequipment.
Ezamination areasincludevesselcircumferential, nozzle-to-shell, andnozzlepipingwelds.TheMechUTezaminations oftheRPVwillbeperformed inaccordance withtherequirements ofthe74/S75SectionXIandReydatory Guide1.150,Rev.1.Na)"RPVShellandHeadAVelds1)0-degreelongitudinal wave(UTOL)examinations willbeperformed fordetection oflaminarreQectors whichmightaffectinterpretation ofangle-beam results.2)0-degreelongitudinal wave(UTOKV)ezaminations willalsobeperformed fordetection ofreflectors intheweldandbasematerial.
3)45-degree and60-de~eeshearwave(UT45andUT60)ezaminations willbeperformed fordetection ofreflectors intheweldandbasematerialorientedparalleltotheweld.4)45-degree and60-degree transverse shearwave(UT45TandUT60T)ezaminations willbeperformed fordetection ofreflectors intheweldandbasematerialorientedtransverse totheweld.5)InthecaseoftheRPVwelds,SwRI50/70tandemsearchunitsv%beusedtoezaminetoadepthofapproximately 2.25inchesfordetection ofreQectors intheclad-to-base metalinterface areaandalsointhevolumebetweentheexamination surfaceandthedepthofthefirstCodecalibration reQector.
Thesedual-element tandemsearchunitsdevelopaninteractive beamwithlongitudinal
'wavepropagation andproduceanezamination withsignificantly improvedsignal-to-noise ratiooverconventional near-surface techniques.
CIt,rF~
b)RPVNozzleAreasTheinlet,outlet,andsafetyinjection nozzle-to-vessel weldswillbeexaminedfromtheboreutilizing 15-degree (forinletnozzles),
10degree(foroutletnozzles)10-degree (forsafetyinjection nozzle)and45-degree beamsfordetection ofreQectors intheweldandbasematerial.
Inaddition, UT45TandUT60Tezaminations willbeperformed fromtheshellinsidesurfacefordetection ofreQectors orientedtransverse totheweldandbasematerial.
Thesetransverse examinations vrillutilizeacomputertocontroltheX-Y-Zmovements ofthePaR.devicetoassureaccuratepositioning aroundthenozzleduringezaminations.
50/70tandemsearchunitswiHbeutilizedfromtheboreandshellinsidesurfacesfordetection ofreflectors locatedintheclad-to-base metalinterface regionandalsothevolumebetweentheexamination surfaceendtheQrstCodecalibration reQectorforthepurposeofsatisfying therequirements inSectionXI.c)PipingWeldsNozzlePiinWeldsFortheinletsafeend-to-nozzle welds,aUTOLscanwillbeusedfordetection ofreQectors whichmightaffectinterpretation oftheangle-beam results.UT45andUT60scanswillbeusedfordetection ofreQectors paralleltotheweldfrombothsidesoftheweld.AUT45Tscanwillbeusedfordetection ofreflectors orientedtransverse totheweld.Theacousticproperties oftheinletelbowsprecludeezamination fromtheelbowside;therefore, aUTOWscanwillbeperformed inadditiontothescansidentifled above.Limitations areexpectedaroundthevesselsupportlugs,safetyinjection andinletnozzlesduetotheproximity ofthesecomponents.
Otherlimitations arelisted.I.Circumferential weldsEstimated time-(2.5shifts)Ringfory'ng-to-lower headweld(RPV-E)Ezamination area0-3600-360Angle0,45,60,50/70 0,45T,60T,50/70T BeamComponent up/dnmv/cdLowersheD-to-ring forgingweld(RPV-D)Ezamination area0-3600-360Angle0,45,60,50/70 0,45T,60T,50/70T BeamComponent up/dncw/ccwLimitations duetoprozimity ofcoresupportlugs@0from(344.20-15.90)CG-190from(74.20-105.80)CG-2180from(164.20-195.80)CG-3270from(255.25-284.75)CGAIntermediate sheD-to-lower shellweld(RPV-C)Ezamination area0-3600-360Angle0,45,60,50/70 0,45T,60T,50/70T BeamComponent up/dnmv/cd 1~h~t
~~D.UppersheH-to-intermediate shellweld(RPV-B)Examination area0-3600-360Angle0,45,60,50/70 0,45T,60T,50/70T BeamComponent up/dncw/ccwII.Uppershellregionarea(A)A.Flange-to-upper shellweld(RPV-A)fromshellEstimated time-(3.0Shifts)Examination area0-3600-360Angle0,45,60,50/70 0,45T,60T,50/70T BeamComponent upcw/cdB.Outletnozzle-to-shell welds(N1A),(NlB)fromshellExamination areanozzle(0-360)Angle0,45T,GOT,50/70T BeamComponent nv/cdC.Inletnozzle-to-shell welds(N2A),(N2H)fromshellExamination areanozzle(0-360)Angle0,45T,GOT,50/70T BeamComponent cw/cdD.Safetyinjection nozzle-to-shell weld(AC-1002),
(AC-1003) fromshellExamination areanozzle(0-360)Angle0,45T,60T,50/70T BeamComponent av/cdIII.Uppershellrey'onarea(B)A.Flange-to-upper shellweld(RPV-A)fromsealsurfaceEstimated Time-(1.5shifts)Examination area0-360B.Vesselsupportlugs'mmination areaVesselsupport(RPV-VSL-1)
Vesselsupport(RPV-VSL-1)
Vesselsupport(RPV-VSL-2)
Vesselsupport(RPV-VSL-2)
Angle18,11,4Angle0,45,60,50/70 0,45T,60T,50/70T 0,45,60,50/70 0,45T,60T,50/70T BeamComponent dnBeamComponent up/dnnv/cdup/dncw/ca,vA1-3 I~wJ'I~~
IV.Nozzleinnerradius,integralmentionandnozzleboreEstimated time-(3.5shifts)~7~~rA.Outletnozzleinnerradiussectionintegralextension regionandnozzlebore.B.Examination areaOutletA(N1A-IRS)
OutletB(NlB-IRS)
OutletA(N1A-IE)OutletB(N1B-IE)InletnozzleinsideradiusregionExamination areaInletA(N2A-IRS)
InletB(N2B-IRS)
Angle10,45,50/70 10,45,50/70 50/7050/70Angle50/70-50/70BeamComponent ToVesselC/Lcw/ccwToVesselC/Lcw/cmvToVesselC/LToVesselC/LBeamComponent cw/cmvcw/cdC.Nozzle-to-sheD weldsfromnozzleboreExamination areaInletA(N2A)InletB(N2B)Angle15,45,50/70 15,45,50/70 BeamComponent ToVesselC/Lnv/cdToVesselC/Lzv/ccwD.Safetyinjection insideradiusregionandnozzleboreEmmination areaSafetyinjection A(ACr1003-IRS)
Safetyinjection B(AC-1002-IRS)
Angle0,100,10BeamComponent ToVesselC/LToVesselC/LSafetyinjection nozzleintegralnxensionEzamination areaAngleSafetyinjection A{AC-1003-IE) 70Safetyinjection B{AC-1002-IE) 70BeamComponent AvWvV.Nozzle-to-piping weldsElbow-toinletnozzleweldsEstimated Time-(3.5Shifts)Ezamination areaInletA(PL-FW-V)
InletB(PL-PV-VII)
InletA(PL-FKV-V)
InletB(PL-FW-VII)
InletA(PL-FW-V)
InletB(PL-FW-VII)
Angle0,45,600,45,6045RLT45RLT45RL45RLBeamComponent AwayfromVesselC/LAwayfromVesselC/Lnv/cdcw/cnvToVesselC/LToVesselC/L 4~I~t B.Nozzle-to pipingweldsExamination areaOutletA(PIPW-II)OutletA(PL-FW-Il)
OutletB(PL-FiV-IV)
OutletB(PIFW-IV)C.Safeend-to-nozzle weldsExamination areaSafetyinjection A(AC-1003-1)
Safetyinjection A(AC-1003-1)
Safetyinjection B(AC-1002-1)
Safetyinjection B(AC-1002-1)
D.Piping-to-safe endweldsExamination areaSafetyinjection'A(AC-1003-2)
Safetyinjection A(AC-1003-2)
Safetyinjection B(AC-1002-2)
Safetyinjection B(AC-1002-2)
Angle0,45,60,45T,60 0,45,60,45T,60 0,45,60,45T,60 0,45>60,45T,60 Angle0,45,45T,60 0,45,45T,60 0,45,45T,60 0,45,45T,60 Angle0,45,45T,60 0745,45T,60 0,45,45T,60 0,45,45T,60 BeamComponent AwayfromVesselC/LToVesselC/LAwayfromVesselC/LToVesselC/LBeamComponent AwayfromVesselC/LToVesselC/LAwayfromVesselC/LToVesselC/LBeamComponent AwayfromVesselC/LToVesselC/LAwayfromVesselC/LToVesselC/L
SCHEDULEOFMECHANIZED EXAMINATIONS FORR.E.GIHHARPVanination AreasCircunferential
'LleldsRPV-E,D,C,-BDay1Day22[12Day3Day412I--I-Day5Day6Day7I12I--I-DaysOn~==Vessel (c="-Crew ShiftUpperShellRegionAreaMelds(A)RPV-A,H1A,N18,H2A,HZB,AC-1002,&AC.1003UpperShellRegionAreaWelds(8)RPV-VSL1)
RPV-VSL2(
&RPV-AAC1002PipingMeldsElbowcoInletNozzleAPL-FM.V8PLFM;VIIOutletNozzletoPipeAPL-FN-II8PL-FM-IVSISafeEndtoNozzleAAC-1003-1 8AC-10021SIPipetoSafeEndAAC.1003.2 8AC-1002.2 NozzleInsideRadiusSectionsandIntegralExtension OutletA(H1A-IRS,-
IE)Outlet8(N18-IRS,-IE)
InletA(H2A-IRS)
Inlet8(H28-IRS)
Safetyinjection AC.1003.IRS,-IE IRS,-IE----X
$~'1
'~~~tIII1~'~~I~t~'tII
~005~8S~I>I~~IQ')I0P 7%~i NlAOUTi~iNOZZi~A2830'OZZLETO~SELWELD(mICAL)VESSELSUPPORTVSL-1eBB-30'0 II2~e.iINJECTION NOc~'=AC-'I00310830'OOPAN29,Wl::NOZZ'"S14830'2AINI:-iNOZZ'A32830'UPPOrc iPAD-/~/I//-/)2/0AC-IGD2ACiGG22880'OOPBVSi-2~2"830'80IIIIIIIIIIIaaa.lWCZ.'IDC'1~~II'OSHO.REACTORPRESSUREYc=SELGDfFAROC..~~~~~~C--R05i~cNB<
TURK fT1 ATTACHMENT 4NOZZLEFLAWSIZXNGPROGRAM(FOCUSEDTRANSDUCER DEVELOPMENT) 4