ML050970475: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:Corrective Action Program Dave Lavigne
 
Corrective Action Program
* CER Statistics
* Management Initiatives
* Trending
* Recent Changes
* The Next Steps
* Conclusion
 
CER Statistics (A Look at the Numbers) 1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004 CERs Initiated        1527  1907  2431  3925  4526  4005 Average Per Day      4.2  5.2  6.7    10.8  12.4  10.9
 
NRC Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection (May 2004)
* One Green Finding
* One Licensee Identified Violation
* Several Observations were noted
 
Steam Propagation Barrier Door Management Review Team (MRT)
Composed of GMs and Managers
* Review Immediate Actions
* Determine Cause Category
* Verify Ownership
* Evaluate Repetitive Events
* Monitor Due Date Extensions
 
Corrective Action Review Board (CARB)
Improved Root Cause Analysis
* Pre-CARB
* Interim CARB
* SMART Actions
 
ESF Loading Sequencer Panel Trending
* Performed Quarterly
* Results presented at VP Performance Indicator Meeting and NSRC
* Trend Examples:
  - Tagging Errors
  - Chemical Labeling
  - Work Execution Errors
 
Risk Insights
* CERs Reviewed by PRA group for Risk Significance
* Results reported in Quarterly Trend Report
* Presented at VP Performance Indicator Meeting and NSRC
 
Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA)
CERs divided into four analysis groups
: 1) Initiating Event Group
: 2) Mitigating System Group
: 3) Barriers to Human Performance
: 4) Fission Product Barrier Group
 
Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA)
*Initiating Event Group CERs Item  CER #    DATE  *Description                                  PRA          O.E.
Significanc e
1    3386    10/27/04 During the resetting of the A train loading    Low      LER 425-sequencer after the completion of the                  95004 maintenance run on A D/G the undervoltage test switch was inadvertently actuated.
2    3767  12/4/2004 Diesel Driven IA compressor would not start    Low      None Found on test run due to low batteries.
3    3234  12/12/200 An acrid smell was reported from the relay    Low      None Found 4    room which was followed shortly thereafter by numerous train B BISI alarms.
4    3856  12/13/200 C SW Pump breaker (XSW1EB 02)                Low      414-97003, 4    charging springs failed to charge.                      414-02006-1
 
Good Catch Program
* Excess play on blast door handle
* Maintenance 2nd verification qualification issue
* Work in two different protection cabinets
* Clearing of D/G engine cylinders of moisture (permitted by IN-97-16)
* OE Screening walk down identified trash barrel covering a floor sample grate
 
Station Human Performance Event Clock Resets
* Nine in 2003
* Five in 2004
* Curtailed event free run of 145 days in April 2004 based on adverse door trend
 
CAP Changes
* Added Levels to CER Actions.
  - Prioritize actions in five categories
  - Separates important actions such as CAPRs for increased management awareness
* Applied stricter controls to completion dates.
 
Next Steps
* Single, integrated program for Condition Reports and Work Orders.
* Increase ability to identify trends
* Provide Common report capabilities.
* Improve identification of timeliness issues.
* Integrate with budgeting and scheduling
 
Conclusion Continuous improvement being driven by Corrective Action Program
 
Questions?}}

Latest revision as of 20:49, 11 January 2020

Presentation Slides for 03/31/05 Meeting with NRC - Corrective Action Program
ML050970475
Person / Time
Site: Summer South Carolina Electric & Gas Company icon.png
Issue date: 03/31/2005
From: Lavigne D
South Carolina Electric & Gas Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML050970475 List:
References
Download: ML050970475 (18)


Text

Corrective Action Program Dave Lavigne

Corrective Action Program

  • CER Statistics
  • Management Initiatives
  • Trending
  • Recent Changes
  • The Next Steps
  • Conclusion

CER Statistics (A Look at the Numbers) 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 CERs Initiated 1527 1907 2431 3925 4526 4005 Average Per Day 4.2 5.2 6.7 10.8 12.4 10.9

NRC Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection (May 2004)

  • One Green Finding
  • One Licensee Identified Violation
  • Several Observations were noted

Steam Propagation Barrier Door Management Review Team (MRT)

Composed of GMs and Managers

  • Review Immediate Actions
  • Determine Cause Category
  • Verify Ownership
  • Evaluate Repetitive Events
  • Monitor Due Date Extensions

Corrective Action Review Board (CARB)

Improved Root Cause Analysis

  • Pre-CARB

ESF Loading Sequencer Panel Trending

  • Performed Quarterly
  • Results presented at VP Performance Indicator Meeting and NSRC
  • Trend Examples:

- Tagging Errors

- Chemical Labeling

- Work Execution Errors

Risk Insights

  • CERs Reviewed by PRA group for Risk Significance
  • Results reported in Quarterly Trend Report
  • Presented at VP Performance Indicator Meeting and NSRC

Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA)

CERs divided into four analysis groups

1) Initiating Event Group
2) Mitigating System Group
3) Barriers to Human Performance
4) Fission Product Barrier Group

Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA)

  • Initiating Event Group CERs Item CER # DATE *Description PRA O.E.

Significanc e

1 3386 10/27/04 During the resetting of the A train loading Low LER 425-sequencer after the completion of the 95004 maintenance run on A D/G the undervoltage test switch was inadvertently actuated.

2 3767 12/4/2004 Diesel Driven IA compressor would not start Low None Found on test run due to low batteries.

3 3234 12/12/200 An acrid smell was reported from the relay Low None Found 4 room which was followed shortly thereafter by numerous train B BISI alarms.

4 3856 12/13/200 C SW Pump breaker (XSW1EB 02) Low 414-97003, 4 charging springs failed to charge. 414-02006-1

Good Catch Program

  • Excess play on blast door handle
  • Maintenance 2nd verification qualification issue
  • Work in two different protection cabinets
  • Clearing of D/G engine cylinders of moisture (permitted by IN-97-16)
  • OE Screening walk down identified trash barrel covering a floor sample grate

Station Human Performance Event Clock Resets

  • Nine in 2003
  • Five in 2004
  • Curtailed event free run of 145 days in April 2004 based on adverse door trend

CAP Changes

  • Added Levels to CER Actions.

- Prioritize actions in five categories

- Separates important actions such as CAPRs for increased management awareness

  • Applied stricter controls to completion dates.

Next Steps

  • Single, integrated program for Condition Reports and Work Orders.
  • Increase ability to identify trends
  • Provide Common report capabilities.
  • Improve identification of timeliness issues.
  • Integrate with budgeting and scheduling

Conclusion Continuous improvement being driven by Corrective Action Program

Questions?