ML18011B070: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:~P RIQRITY | {{#Wiki_filter:~ P RIQRITY (ACCELERATED RIDS PROCESSING) | ||
REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9512050148 DOC.DATE: 95/11/30 NOTARIZED: | REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS) | ||
NO FACIL:50-400 Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Carolina AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION VERRILLI,M. | ACCESSION NBR:9512050148 DOC.DATE: 95/11/30 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-400 Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Carolina 05000400 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION VERRILLI,M. Carolina Power & Light Co. | ||
Carolina Power&Light Co.DONAHUE,J.W. | DONAHUE,J.W. Carolina Power & Light Co. P RECXP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION R | ||
Carolina Power&Light Co.RECXP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
LER 95-006-01:on 950824,ECCS sys piping was not fully contained within RAB emergency exhaust sos boundary resulted in condition outside design basis.Periodically inspected affected piping for leakage.W/951130 ltr.DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEXVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Incident Rpt, etc | LER 95-006-01:on 950824,ECCS sys piping was not fully contained within RAB emergency exhaust sos boundary resulted in condition outside design basis.Periodically inspected affected piping for leakage.W/951130 ltr. 0 DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEXVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: | ||
TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Incident Rpt, etc NOTES:Application for permit renewal filed. 05000400 RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD2-1 PD 1 1 LE,N 1 1 XNTERNAL: ACRS 1 1 A D~B 2 2 AEOD/SPD/RRAB 1 1 FILE C NTE~ 1 1 NRR/DE/ECGB 1 1 DE7EE~B 1 1 NRR/DE/EMEB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HHFB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HICB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HOLB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HQMB 1 1 NRR/DRPM/PECB 1 1 NRR/DSSA/SPLB 1 1 NRR/DSSA/SRXB 1 1 RES/DSIR/EIB 1 1 RGN2 FILE 01 1 1 D EXTERNAL: L ST LOBBY WARD 1 1 LITCO BRYCE I J H 2 2 NOAC MURPHY,G.A 1 1 NOAC POORE,W. 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NUDOCS FULL TXT 1 1 U | |||
N, T | |||
¹1 ( | NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS: | ||
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE iVKSTE! CONTACTTHE DOCL'iIENTCONTROL DESK, ROOIt I PI-37 (EXT. 504.2083 ) TO ELIXIINATE5'OL'R N':AIL'l<OuI DISTRIBUTION LISTS I'OR DOCI.'i!L'N'I'SYOU DON"I'LI'.I)! | |||
FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 26 ENCL 26 | |||
Carolina Power & Light Company Harris Nudear Plant PO Box 165 New Hill NC 27562 NOV 3 0 1995 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial: HNP-95-111 ATTN: NRC Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-400 LICENSE NO. NPF-63 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT 95-006-01 Gentlemen: | |||
)(50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)( | In accordance with Title 10 to the Code of Federal Regulations, the enclosed Licensee Event Report revision is submitted to provide additional information regarding the inconsistencies between the design of the Reactor Auxiliary Building Emergency Exhaust System and the associated offsite dose analysis. | ||
Sincerely, J. W. Donahue General Manager, Harris, Plant MV Enclosure c: Mr. S. D. Ebneter (NRC - RII) | |||
Mr. N. B. Le (NRC - PM/NRR) | |||
Mr. D. J. Roberts (NRC - SHNPP) 95i2050148 95i130 PDR ADOCK 05000400 8 ,PDR f State Road 1138 New Hill NC ~gyp | |||
In July 1995, during a review of regulatory issues, the validity of the dose assessment analysis for Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS)leakage outside of containment, contained in section 15.6.5 of the Harris Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), was questioned by Harris plant personnel. | NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150-0104 (4-95) EXPIRES 4/30/98 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: | ||
Additional research into this analysis was performed by CP&L Engineering personnel. | TO C(NPLY WITH 50.0 HRS. | ||
The main concern was that the methodology of the ECCS leakage assumptions in the dose calculation did not match the assumptions in the Standard Review Plan (SRP).After reviewing sufficient information confirming that a potential problem did indeed exist, a Condition Report (CR¹95-1862)was initiated on August 7, 1995, and a formal investigation was initiated to resolve the concern.After re-evaluating the ECCS components located outside the boundary of the RAB Emergency Exhaust System and the corresponding assumed external leakage rates, it became apparent that dose rates exceeded those values originally used to establish'the licensing basis of the plant.A 1-hour non-emergency report for a condition outside the design basis of the plant was made to the NRC per 10CFR50.72, via tlie Emergency Notification System on August 24, 1995.Continued operation was justified with compensatory measures that included establishment of an ECCS leakage limit to ensure that calculated off site dose following a design basis accident would remain within 10CFR100 limits and leak testing and inspection requirements for the subject ECCS piping.Further engineering analysis, including a recalculated offsite dose assessment were completed and provided to the NRC in a letter dated September 23, 1995 and at a NRC meeting on September 25, 1995.The analysis incorporated the unfiltered ECCS leakage values and based upon established administrative controls and limitations concluded that offsite dose rates would remain within acceptable regulatory limits.CAUSE: A root cause investigation was performed by Harris Engineering personnel and determined the cause of this condition to be inadequate documentation and communication of assumptions,'between two separate engineering groups within the plant's architect engineering firm during initial plant design, which resulted in incorrectly considering that all ECCS leakage would be filtered prior to release to the environment. | REPORTED LESSONS LEARNED ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE LICENSING PROCESS AND FED BACK TO INDUSTRY. | ||
The investigation revealed that the plant was intentionally designed (by the architect engineer)and constructed with a portion of the ECCS recirculation piping outside of the RAB Emergency Exhaust System boundary.Locating much of the Charging/Safety Injection Pump (CSIP)suction and discharge piping above the pump cubicles in the RAB mezannine area was intended to improve accessability, reduce ALARA concerns, as well as provide a benefit by improving the associated stress analysis.This approach was considered acceptable based on the design criteria and NRC regulations that existed at the time (early 1970's).The offsite dose assessments, which are based in part on ECCS leakage assumptions, were performed years later at a time when requirements and interpretations were different than when the original plant design was completed. | (See reverse for required number of digits/characters for each block) FORWARD COUNTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION. WASHINGTON. | ||
These original dose assessments incorrectly consid red that all ECCS leakage would be filtered by the emergency exhaust system.SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE: | DC 20555-0001, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PRMECT (3150-0104). OFFICE OF MANAGEYiENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON. DC 20503. | ||
There were no adverse safety consequences as a result of th)s condition. | FACILITY NAME (1) DOCKET NUMBER (2) PAGE (3) | ||
This is based on the fact that the ECCS piping and components outside the RAB Emergency Exhaust System boundary are designed such that large leak rates are not expected during normal operation. | Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant-Unit ¹1 1 of 3 TITLE (4) Emergency Core Cooling System piping not fully contained within Reactor Auxiliary Building Emergency Exhaust S stem bounda resultin in condition outside desi n basis. | ||
This, combined with normal plant operational, maintenance, and health physics practices would have controlled leakage to ensure that resulting offsite airborne radioactivity levels following design basis accident remained within 10CFR100 limits.It should also be noted that ECCS leakage from outside the emergency exhaust system boundary is not likely to escape the boundary of the RAB.The RAB is an enclosed structure that is normally drawn to a negative pressure and, though not credited in the offsite dose analysis, the airborne leakage from these areas would most likely be drawn in to one of the adjacent emergency exhaust system boundary rooms and limit the realistic release of airborne radioactive material to the environment. | EVENT DATE (5) LER NUMBER (6) REPORT DATE (7) OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8) | ||
R RM A(4.I NRC FORM 36BA l4BB)LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERj TEXT CONTINUATION | REVISION FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER DAY YEAR SEQUENTIAL UMBER NUYBER MONTH DAY 05000 08 24 95 95 -- 006 01 30 95 FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 05000 OPERATING (9) | ||
THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 5: (Check one or more) (ll) | |||
HODE 20.402(b) 20.405(c) 50.73(a)(2)<iv) 73.71(b) | |||
POWER 20.405(a)(l)(i) 50.36(c)(1) 50.73(a)(2)(v) 73.71(c) 76K LEVEL (10) 20.405<a)<I)(ii) 50.36(c)(2) 50.73(a)(2)(vii) OTHER 20.405(a)(1)(iii) 50.73(a)(2)(i) 50.73(a)(2)(vifi)(A) (Specify in 20.405(a)(l)(iv) )( 50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) Abstract below and in Text. | |||
20.405(a)(1)(v) 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 50.73(a)(2)(x) NRC Form 366A) | |||
LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12) | |||
TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area Code) | |||
Michael Verrilli Sr. Analyst - Licensing (919) 362-2303 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13) | |||
SYSTEM REPORTABLE REPORTABLE CG IPONENT MANUFACTURER CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER TO NPRDS TO NPRDS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14) MONTH DAY YEAR EXPECTED YES SUBHISS ION | |||
( If yes. complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE). X NO DATE (15) | |||
ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces. i.e.. approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16) | |||
On August 24, 1995, a discrepancy related to the original design of the Reactor Auxiliary Building (RAB) | |||
Emergency Exhaust System was determined to constitute a condition outside the design basis of the plant as described in the Harris Plant Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR). This discrepancy pertains to a portion of Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) piping that is physically located outside of the boundary of the RAB Emergency Exhaust System envelope. If leakage consisting of highly radioactive water occurred from this section of piping during a postulated design basis loss of coolant accident (LOCA), offsite dose rates would be higher than originally concluded. Specifically, the FSAR dose rate analysis assumed that released effluent would first be processed through the RAB Emergency Exhaust System filtration units, prior to being released to the atmosphere. This would not be true for ECCS leakage outside of the emergency ventilation system boundary. The cause of the inconsistency was determined to be inadequate documentation and communication of assumptions between two separate engineering groups within the plant's architect engineering firm during initial plant'design, which resulted in incorrectly assuming that all ECCS leakage would be filtered. Additional engineering analysis, including a recalculated offsite dose assessment were completed and provided to the NRC. | |||
The analysis incorporated the unfiltered ECCS leakage values and based on administrative controls and limitations concluded that offsite dose rates will remain within acceptable regulatory limits. | |||
NRC Fi4(M 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4a6) | |||
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) | |||
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (I) OOCXET LER NUMBER (6) PAGE g) | |||
SEOUENTIAL RB>SION YEAR NUMBER NUMBER Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant ~ | |||
Unit /I 1 50400 2 OF 3 95 - 006 Ol TEXT Pl mart spur is roqoi cd, ose orrdrrr'arrsl copier of NRC Farm 3'I 1) | |||
EVENT DESCRIPTION: | |||
In July 1995, during a review of regulatory issues, the validity of the dose assessment analysis for Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) leakage outside of containment, contained in section 15.6.5 of the Harris Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), was questioned by Harris plant personnel. Additional research into this analysis was performed by CP&L Engineering personnel. The main concern was that the methodology of the ECCS leakage assumptions in the dose calculation did not match the assumptions in the Standard Review Plan (SRP). After reviewing sufficient information confirming that a potential problem did indeed exist, a Condition Report (CR ¹95-1862) was initiated on August 7, 1995, and a formal investigation was initiated to resolve the concern. After re-evaluating the ECCS components located outside the boundary of the RAB Emergency Exhaust System and the corresponding assumed external leakage rates, it became apparent that dose rates exceeded those values originally used to establish'the licensing basis of the plant. A 1-hour non-emergency report for a condition outside the design basis of the plant was made to the NRC per 10CFR50.72, via tlie Emergency Notification System on August 24, 1995. | |||
Continued operation was justified with compensatory measures that included establishment of an ECCS leakage limit to ensure that calculated off site dose following a design basis accident would remain within 10CFR100 limits and leak testing and inspection requirements for the subject ECCS piping. | |||
Further engineering analysis, including a recalculated offsite dose assessment were completed and provided to the NRC in a letter dated September 23, 1995 and at a NRC meeting on September 25, 1995. The analysis incorporated the unfiltered ECCS leakage values and based upon established administrative controls and limitations concluded that offsite dose rates would remain within acceptable regulatory limits. | |||
CAUSE: | |||
A root cause investigation was performed by Harris Engineering personnel and determined the cause of this condition to be inadequate documentation and communication of assumptions, 'between two separate engineering groups within the plant's architect engineering firm during initial plant design, which resulted in incorrectly considering that all ECCS leakage would be filtered prior to release to the environment. The investigation revealed that the plant was intentionally designed (by the architect engineer) and constructed with a portion of the ECCS recirculation piping outside of the RAB Emergency Exhaust System boundary. Locating much of the Charging/Safety Injection Pump (CSIP) suction and discharge piping above the pump cubicles in the RAB mezannine area was intended to improve accessability, reduce ALARA concerns, as well as provide a benefit by improving the associated stress analysis. This approach was considered acceptable based on the design criteria and NRC regulations that existed at the time (early 1970's). The offsite dose assessments, which are based in part on ECCS leakage assumptions, were performed years later at a time when requirements and interpretations were different than when the original plant design was completed. These original dose assessments incorrectly consid red that all ECCS leakage would be filtered by the emergency exhaust system. | |||
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE: | |||
There were no adverse safety consequences as a result of th)s condition. This is based on the fact that the ECCS piping and components outside the RAB Emergency Exhaust System boundary are designed such that large leak rates are not expected during normal operation. This, combined with normal plant operational, maintenance, and health physics practices would have controlled leakage to ensure that resulting offsite airborne radioactivity levels following design basis accident remained within 10CFR100 limits. It should also be noted that ECCS leakage from outside the emergency exhaust system boundary is not likely to escape the boundary of the RAB. The RAB is an enclosed structure that is normally drawn to a negative pressure and, though not credited in the offsite dose analysis, the airborne leakage from these areas would most likely be drawn in to one of the adjacent emergency exhaust system boundary rooms and limit the realistic release of airborne radioactive material to the environment. | |||
R RM A(4. I | |||
NRC FORM 36BA US. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l4BB) | |||
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERj TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME ll) OOCKET IER NUMBER (6) PAGE )3) | |||
SEQUENTIAL REY5)ON YEAR NUMBER NUMBER Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant ~ | |||
Unit //1 50400 3 OF 3 95 - 006 - 01 TEXT Pl mom spssoir saqvied, oso odc0'zmosl sop)ss o! /PRC Form 3BQ) )17) | |||
PREVIOUS SIMILAR LERs: | |||
There have been no similar LER's submitted. | |||
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS COMPLETED: | CORRECTIVE ACTIONS COMPLETED: | ||
The following compensatory measures were established and were applicable for operation in Modes 1-4 pending completion of the engineering analysis: 1.An administrative leakage limit was established for this portion of the ECCS system.2.The affected piping areas were periodically inspected for leakage by Operations personnel. | The following compensatory measures were established and were applicable for operation in Modes 1-4 pending completion of the engineering analysis: | ||
3.Radiation monitor trends were periodically reviewed by Operations personnel as an early means of leakage detection. | : 1. An administrative leakage limit was established for this portion of the ECCS system. | ||
4.Administrative controls were developed to maintain the RAB boundary to minimize unfiltered leakage. | : 2. The affected piping areas were periodically inspected for leakage by Operations personnel. | ||
1.A root cause investigation was completed and the results were utilized for this LER revision.2.Engineering analysis and a new dose assessment were completed to incorpoprate the postulated unfiltered<ECCS leakage.3.Procedure PLP-114 was revised to incorporate the administrative requirements delineated in the new dose assessment. | : 3. Radiation monitor trends were periodically reviewed by Operations personnel as an early means of leakage detection. | ||
4.A modification was completed to allow the RAB Equipment Drain System to be vented to the RAB Emergency Exhaust System versus the Normal RAB Ventilation System.This modified drain system configuration will ensure that radioactive leakage from ECCS components is directed through the safety related filtration units prior to being released to the atmosphere. | : 4. Administrative controls were developed to maintain the RAB boundary to minimize unfiltered leakage. | ||
5.The recalculated offsite dose analysis was submitted to the NRC for review and approval on September 23, 1995.EIIS INFORMATION: | ADDITIONALCORRECTIVE ACTIONS COMPLETED: | ||
: 1. A root cause investigation was completed and the results were utilized for this LER revision. | |||
: 2. Engineering analysis and a new dose assessment were completed to incorpoprate the postulated unfiltered<ECCS leakage. | |||
: 3. Procedure PLP-114 was revised to incorporate the administrative requirements delineated in the new dose assessment. | |||
: 4. A modification was completed to allow the RAB Equipment Drain System to be vented to the RAB Emergency Exhaust System versus the Normal RAB Ventilation System. This modified drain system configuration will ensure that radioactive leakage from ECCS components is directed through the safety related filtration units prior to being released to the atmosphere. | |||
: 5. The recalculated offsite dose analysis was submitted to the NRC for review and approval on September 23, 1995. | |||
EIIS INFORMATION: | |||
S stem Name/Code: | S stem Name/Code: | ||
Chemical and Volume Control System (CVCS)-CB Residual Heat Removal/Low Pressure Safety Injection-BP High Pressure Safety Injection-BQ}} | Chemical and Volume Control System (CVCS) - CB Residual Heat Removal/Low Pressure Safety Injection - BP High Pressure Safety Injection - BQ}} |
Latest revision as of 06:05, 22 October 2019
ML18011B070 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Harris ![]() |
Issue date: | 11/30/1995 |
From: | Donahue J, Verrilli M CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
References | |
HNP-95-111, LER-95-006, LER-95-6, NUDOCS 9512050148 | |
Download: ML18011B070 (5) | |
Text
~ P RIQRITY (ACCELERATED RIDS PROCESSING)
REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:9512050148 DOC.DATE: 95/11/30 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-400 Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Carolina 05000400 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION VERRILLI,M. Carolina Power & Light Co.
DONAHUE,J.W. Carolina Power & Light Co. P RECXP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION R
SUBJECT:
LER 95-006-01:on 950824,ECCS sys piping was not fully contained within RAB emergency exhaust sos boundary resulted in condition outside design basis.Periodically inspected affected piping for leakage.W/951130 ltr. 0 DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEXVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:
TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Incident Rpt, etc NOTES:Application for permit renewal filed. 05000400 RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD2-1 PD 1 1 LE,N 1 1 XNTERNAL: ACRS 1 1 A D~B 2 2 AEOD/SPD/RRAB 1 1 FILE C NTE~ 1 1 NRR/DE/ECGB 1 1 DE7EE~B 1 1 NRR/DE/EMEB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HHFB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HICB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HOLB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HQMB 1 1 NRR/DRPM/PECB 1 1 NRR/DSSA/SPLB 1 1 NRR/DSSA/SRXB 1 1 RES/DSIR/EIB 1 1 RGN2 FILE 01 1 1 D EXTERNAL: L ST LOBBY WARD 1 1 LITCO BRYCE I J H 2 2 NOAC MURPHY,G.A 1 1 NOAC POORE,W. 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NUDOCS FULL TXT 1 1 U
N, T
NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE iVKSTE! CONTACTTHE DOCL'iIENTCONTROL DESK, ROOIt I PI-37 (EXT. 504.2083 ) TO ELIXIINATE5'OL'R N':AIL'l<OuI DISTRIBUTION LISTS I'OR DOCI.'i!L'N'I'SYOU DON"I'LI'.I)!
FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 26 ENCL 26
Carolina Power & Light Company Harris Nudear Plant PO Box 165 New Hill NC 27562 NOV 3 0 1995 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial: HNP-95-111 ATTN: NRC Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-400 LICENSE NO. NPF-63 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT 95-006-01 Gentlemen:
In accordance with Title 10 to the Code of Federal Regulations, the enclosed Licensee Event Report revision is submitted to provide additional information regarding the inconsistencies between the design of the Reactor Auxiliary Building Emergency Exhaust System and the associated offsite dose analysis.
Sincerely, J. W. Donahue General Manager, Harris, Plant MV Enclosure c: Mr. S. D. Ebneter (NRC - RII)
Mr. N. B. Le (NRC - PM/NRR)
Mr. D. J. Roberts (NRC - SHNPP) 95i2050148 95i130 PDR ADOCK 05000400 8 ,PDR f State Road 1138 New Hill NC ~gyp
NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150-0104 (4-95) EXPIRES 4/30/98 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST:
TO C(NPLY WITH 50.0 HRS.
REPORTED LESSONS LEARNED ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE LICENSING PROCESS AND FED BACK TO INDUSTRY.
(See reverse for required number of digits/characters for each block) FORWARD COUNTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION. WASHINGTON.
DC 20555-0001, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PRMECT (3150-0104). OFFICE OF MANAGEYiENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON. DC 20503.
FACILITY NAME (1) DOCKET NUMBER (2) PAGE (3)
Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant-Unit ¹1 1 of 3 TITLE (4) Emergency Core Cooling System piping not fully contained within Reactor Auxiliary Building Emergency Exhaust S stem bounda resultin in condition outside desi n basis.
EVENT DATE (5) LER NUMBER (6) REPORT DATE (7) OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8)
REVISION FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER DAY YEAR SEQUENTIAL UMBER NUYBER MONTH DAY 05000 08 24 95 95 -- 006 01 30 95 FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 05000 OPERATING (9)
THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 5: (Check one or more) (ll)
HODE 20.402(b) 20.405(c) 50.73(a)(2)<iv) 73.71(b)
POWER 20.405(a)(l)(i) 50.36(c)(1) 50.73(a)(2)(v) 73.71(c) 76K LEVEL (10) 20.405<a)<I)(ii) 50.36(c)(2) 50.73(a)(2)(vii) OTHER 20.405(a)(1)(iii) 50.73(a)(2)(i) 50.73(a)(2)(vifi)(A) (Specify in 20.405(a)(l)(iv) )( 50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) Abstract below and in Text.
20.405(a)(1)(v) 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 50.73(a)(2)(x) NRC Form 366A)
LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)
TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area Code)
Michael Verrilli Sr. Analyst - Licensing (919) 362-2303 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)
SYSTEM REPORTABLE REPORTABLE CG IPONENT MANUFACTURER CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER TO NPRDS TO NPRDS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14) MONTH DAY YEAR EXPECTED YES SUBHISS ION
( If yes. complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE). X NO DATE (15)
ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces. i.e.. approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16)
On August 24, 1995, a discrepancy related to the original design of the Reactor Auxiliary Building (RAB)
Emergency Exhaust System was determined to constitute a condition outside the design basis of the plant as described in the Harris Plant Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR). This discrepancy pertains to a portion of Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) piping that is physically located outside of the boundary of the RAB Emergency Exhaust System envelope. If leakage consisting of highly radioactive water occurred from this section of piping during a postulated design basis loss of coolant accident (LOCA), offsite dose rates would be higher than originally concluded. Specifically, the FSAR dose rate analysis assumed that released effluent would first be processed through the RAB Emergency Exhaust System filtration units, prior to being released to the atmosphere. This would not be true for ECCS leakage outside of the emergency ventilation system boundary. The cause of the inconsistency was determined to be inadequate documentation and communication of assumptions between two separate engineering groups within the plant's architect engineering firm during initial plant'design, which resulted in incorrectly assuming that all ECCS leakage would be filtered. Additional engineering analysis, including a recalculated offsite dose assessment were completed and provided to the NRC.
The analysis incorporated the unfiltered ECCS leakage values and based on administrative controls and limitations concluded that offsite dose rates will remain within acceptable regulatory limits.
NRC Fi4(M 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4a6)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (I) OOCXET LER NUMBER (6) PAGE g)
SEOUENTIAL RB>SION YEAR NUMBER NUMBER Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant ~
Unit /I 1 50400 2 OF 3 95 - 006 Ol TEXT Pl mart spur is roqoi cd, ose orrdrrr'arrsl copier of NRC Farm 3'I 1)
EVENT DESCRIPTION:
In July 1995, during a review of regulatory issues, the validity of the dose assessment analysis for Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) leakage outside of containment, contained in section 15.6.5 of the Harris Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), was questioned by Harris plant personnel. Additional research into this analysis was performed by CP&L Engineering personnel. The main concern was that the methodology of the ECCS leakage assumptions in the dose calculation did not match the assumptions in the Standard Review Plan (SRP). After reviewing sufficient information confirming that a potential problem did indeed exist, a Condition Report (CR ¹95-1862) was initiated on August 7, 1995, and a formal investigation was initiated to resolve the concern. After re-evaluating the ECCS components located outside the boundary of the RAB Emergency Exhaust System and the corresponding assumed external leakage rates, it became apparent that dose rates exceeded those values originally used to establish'the licensing basis of the plant. A 1-hour non-emergency report for a condition outside the design basis of the plant was made to the NRC per 10CFR50.72, via tlie Emergency Notification System on August 24, 1995.
Continued operation was justified with compensatory measures that included establishment of an ECCS leakage limit to ensure that calculated off site dose following a design basis accident would remain within 10CFR100 limits and leak testing and inspection requirements for the subject ECCS piping.
Further engineering analysis, including a recalculated offsite dose assessment were completed and provided to the NRC in a letter dated September 23, 1995 and at a NRC meeting on September 25, 1995. The analysis incorporated the unfiltered ECCS leakage values and based upon established administrative controls and limitations concluded that offsite dose rates would remain within acceptable regulatory limits.
CAUSE:
A root cause investigation was performed by Harris Engineering personnel and determined the cause of this condition to be inadequate documentation and communication of assumptions, 'between two separate engineering groups within the plant's architect engineering firm during initial plant design, which resulted in incorrectly considering that all ECCS leakage would be filtered prior to release to the environment. The investigation revealed that the plant was intentionally designed (by the architect engineer) and constructed with a portion of the ECCS recirculation piping outside of the RAB Emergency Exhaust System boundary. Locating much of the Charging/Safety Injection Pump (CSIP) suction and discharge piping above the pump cubicles in the RAB mezannine area was intended to improve accessability, reduce ALARA concerns, as well as provide a benefit by improving the associated stress analysis. This approach was considered acceptable based on the design criteria and NRC regulations that existed at the time (early 1970's). The offsite dose assessments, which are based in part on ECCS leakage assumptions, were performed years later at a time when requirements and interpretations were different than when the original plant design was completed. These original dose assessments incorrectly consid red that all ECCS leakage would be filtered by the emergency exhaust system.
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE:
There were no adverse safety consequences as a result of th)s condition. This is based on the fact that the ECCS piping and components outside the RAB Emergency Exhaust System boundary are designed such that large leak rates are not expected during normal operation. This, combined with normal plant operational, maintenance, and health physics practices would have controlled leakage to ensure that resulting offsite airborne radioactivity levels following design basis accident remained within 10CFR100 limits. It should also be noted that ECCS leakage from outside the emergency exhaust system boundary is not likely to escape the boundary of the RAB. The RAB is an enclosed structure that is normally drawn to a negative pressure and, though not credited in the offsite dose analysis, the airborne leakage from these areas would most likely be drawn in to one of the adjacent emergency exhaust system boundary rooms and limit the realistic release of airborne radioactive material to the environment.
R RM A(4. I
NRC FORM 36BA US. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l4BB)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERj TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME ll) OOCKET IER NUMBER (6) PAGE )3)
SEQUENTIAL REY5)ON YEAR NUMBER NUMBER Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant ~
Unit //1 50400 3 OF 3 95 - 006 - 01 TEXT Pl mom spssoir saqvied, oso odc0'zmosl sop)ss o! /PRC Form 3BQ) )17)
PREVIOUS SIMILAR LERs:
There have been no similar LER's submitted.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS COMPLETED:
The following compensatory measures were established and were applicable for operation in Modes 1-4 pending completion of the engineering analysis:
- 1. An administrative leakage limit was established for this portion of the ECCS system.
- 2. The affected piping areas were periodically inspected for leakage by Operations personnel.
- 3. Radiation monitor trends were periodically reviewed by Operations personnel as an early means of leakage detection.
- 4. Administrative controls were developed to maintain the RAB boundary to minimize unfiltered leakage.
ADDITIONALCORRECTIVE ACTIONS COMPLETED:
- 1. A root cause investigation was completed and the results were utilized for this LER revision.
- 2. Engineering analysis and a new dose assessment were completed to incorpoprate the postulated unfiltered<ECCS leakage.
- 3. Procedure PLP-114 was revised to incorporate the administrative requirements delineated in the new dose assessment.
- 4. A modification was completed to allow the RAB Equipment Drain System to be vented to the RAB Emergency Exhaust System versus the Normal RAB Ventilation System. This modified drain system configuration will ensure that radioactive leakage from ECCS components is directed through the safety related filtration units prior to being released to the atmosphere.
- 5. The recalculated offsite dose analysis was submitted to the NRC for review and approval on September 23, 1995.
EIIS INFORMATION:
S stem Name/Code:
Chemical and Volume Control System (CVCS) - CB Residual Heat Removal/Low Pressure Safety Injection - BP High Pressure Safety Injection - BQ