IR 05000335/1980017: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:FLORIDAPOWER5LIGHTCOMPANYNovember10,1980L-80-377Mr.R.C.Lewis,ActingChiefReactorOperations andNuclearSupportBranchRegionII,OfficeofInspection andEnforcement U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission 101MariettaStreet,Suite3100Atlanta,Georgia30303
{{#Wiki_filter:FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY November 10, 1980 L-80-377 Mr.R.C.Lewis, Acting Chief Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Region II, Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303


==DearMr.Lewis:==
==Dear Mr.Lewis:==
Re:R0-335/80-17
Re: R 0-335/80-17
~CA<><ChWVl~tCPFollowing areviewofthenaturalcirculation cooldownnotification findingreportedin18EInspection Report80-17,and basedontheinterpretation of10CFR50.72asgivenbyMr.R.MartinofyourstafftoourMr.K.Harris,FloridaPower5LightCompanyhasdetermined thattheonehournotification requiredby10CFR50.72(a)(3)shouldhavebeensubmitted withinonehouroftheoccurrence ofunexpected variations inpressurizer level.Althoughwedidreportthisevent,wenowrealizethatthereportshouldnothavebeendelayedinordertomorecompletely definethecausesofthefluctuations.
~CA<><Ch WV l~tCP Following a review of the natural circulation cooldown notification finding reported in 18E Inspection Report 80-17,and based on the interpretation of 10 CFR 50.72 as given by Mr.R.Martin of your staff to our Mr.K.Harris, Florida Power 5 Light Company has determined that the one hour notification required by 10CFR 50.72(a)(3)should have been submitted within one hour of the occurrence of unexpected variations in pressurizer level.Although we did report this event, we now realize that the report should not have been delayed in order to more completely define the causes of the fluctuations.


Inordertoprecluderecurrence, plantoperators havebeenbriefedontheneedtonotifytheNRCOperations Centerwithinthe1hourtimeframeincaseofanyeventthatresultsintheplantbeinginacondition definedin10CFR50.72(a)(3)Fullcompliance wasachievedonOctober31,1980.Verytrulyyours,RobertE.UhrigVicePresident AdvancedSystems8Technology REU/PLP/ras cc:HaroldF.Reis,Esquire001"i"LI"'ifii.
In order to preclude recurrence, plant operators have been briefed on the need to notify the NRC Operations Center within the 1 hour time frame in case of any event that results in the plant being in a condition defined in 10CFR 50.72(a)(3)Full compliance was achieved on October 31, 1980.Very truly yours, R obert E.Uhrig Vice President Advanced Systems 8 Technology REU/PLP/ras cc: Harold F.Reis, Esquire 0 01"i"LI"'ifii.


COPYSOTIImaOI35 PEOPLE...
COPY SOTIImaOI35 PEOPLE...SERVING PEOPLE 0 CS rn C~ypr V..')ti C7i C'>'fill cO>0
SERVINGPEOPLE 0CSrnC~yprV..')tiC7iC'>'fillcO>0
}}
}}

Revision as of 19:17, 7 July 2018

Advises That Util Has Determined That Notification of NRC Re Natural Circulation Cooldown,Discussed in IE Insp Rept 50-335/80-17,should Have Been Submitted within 1-h of Variations in Pressurizer Level.Plant Operators Briefed
ML17209A386
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/10/1980
From: UHRIG R E
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: LEWIS R C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
L-80-377, NUDOCS 8011280135
Download: ML17209A386 (2)


Text

FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY November 10, 1980 L-80-377 Mr.R.C.Lewis, Acting Chief Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Region II, Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Dear Mr.Lewis:

Re: R 0-335/80-17

~CA<><Ch WV l~tCP Following a review of the natural circulation cooldown notification finding reported in 18E Inspection Report 80-17,and based on the interpretation of 10 CFR 50.72 as given by Mr.R.Martin of your staff to our Mr.K.Harris, Florida Power 5 Light Company has determined that the one hour notification required by 10CFR 50.72(a)(3)should have been submitted within one hour of the occurrence of unexpected variations in pressurizer level.Although we did report this event, we now realize that the report should not have been delayed in order to more completely define the causes of the fluctuations.

In order to preclude recurrence, plant operators have been briefed on the need to notify the NRC Operations Center within the 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> time frame in case of any event that results in the plant being in a condition defined in 10CFR 50.72(a)(3)Full compliance was achieved on October 31, 1980.Very truly yours, R obert E.Uhrig Vice President Advanced Systems 8 Technology REU/PLP/ras cc: Harold F.Reis, Esquire 0 01"i"LI"'ifii.

COPY SOTIImaOI35 PEOPLE...SERVING PEOPLE 0 CS rn C~ypr V..')ti C7i C'>'fill cO>0