ML19332C612: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:'; *4 . | {{#Wiki_filter:'; *4 . | ||
'y MMftscTttmtmtIBUT10. | 'y MMftscTttmtmtIBUT10. | ||
/, Vt% )k | /, Vt% )k | ||
* NINE MILE PolNT (1945 | |||
NINE MILE PolNT (1945 | ,} N" Page I | ||
,} N" Page | EXECUTIVE | ||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
Line 34: | Line 29: | ||
The Institute of Nucleu Power Operations (INPC) conducted an evaluation of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 4 Nine Mlle Point Nucleu Station during the weeks of Mar and 20,1989. The station is located oppteximately seven miles east of Oswep, New York, on the southear2 shore of 1.ake Ontarlo. Unit 1 is a 610MTe (net) Cemral E,ectric bollin water reactor that began commercial operation In December IMt. Unit 2 to a 1.080 MTe (net) Ceneral Electric belling water teoctor that began commercla! operating in March 1988. During the evaluation, both units were in cold dwtdown, unit i in an extended outag . ' | The Institute of Nucleu Power Operations (INPC) conducted an evaluation of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 4 Nine Mlle Point Nucleu Station during the weeks of Mar and 20,1989. The station is located oppteximately seven miles east of Oswep, New York, on the southear2 shore of 1.ake Ontarlo. Unit 1 is a 610MTe (net) Cemral E,ectric bollin water reactor that began commercial operation In December IMt. Unit 2 to a 1.080 MTe (net) Ceneral Electric belling water teoctor that began commercla! operating in March 1988. During the evaluation, both units were in cold dwtdown, unit i in an extended outag . ' | ||
and unit 2 in a mainter.ance outage. | and unit 2 in a mainter.ance outage. | ||
inic:tbn la 12 tc;cid wn d;le:cd . | inic:tbn la 12 tc;cid wn d;le:cd . | ||
in acco: dance witly,the freedom of informstlon Act, exemplicas _7 _. | in acco: dance witly,the freedom of informstlon Act, exemplicas _7 _. | ||
F 0IA 9 1 O '/ , | F 0IA 9 1 O '/ , | ||
t l | t l | ||
l l | |||
8911280346 891113 1 374 PDR SS$AN ~ | |||
l | l | ||
: o. . ,- | : o. . ,- | ||
* NINE MILE PotNT (l989) | * NINE MILE PotNT (l989) | ||
. Page 4 ' , | . Page 4 ' , | ||
Findings and recommendations are listed under the performance objectives to which they pertain. Findings describe conditions that detract from meeting the performance ob Ives. Particularly noteworthy conditions that contribute to meeting perfortnance ob tives are identitled as good practices and strengths. Good practices we considered su fielently unique within the industry such that they would be useful to other utilities. | Findings and recommendations are listed under the performance objectives to which they pertain. Findings describe conditions that detract from meeting the performance ob Ives. Particularly noteworthy conditions that contribute to meeting perfortnance ob tives are identitled as good practices and strengths. Good practices we considered su fielently unique within the industry such that they would be useful to other utilities. | ||
The recommendations following each fin (mg we Intended to assist the utility in ongoing efforto to Imptove all upects of its nuclew programs. In addressing thue findings and recommendations, the utility should, in ed(ation to correcting or improving specific conditions, pursue underlying causes and issues. Additional wpporting details for selected I findings we provided in Appendix it. ! | |||
The recommendations following each fin (mg we Intended to assist the utility in ongoing efforto to Imptove all upects of its nuclew programs. In addressing thue findings and | As a part of each station evaluation, the evaluation team follows up on ruponses to findini in previous ieports. Findings with response actlons that ate incomptete, but progtening on a reasonable schedule, are curled forward in Appendix ! to the report. In wees where additional improvements we needed, or where response actions have not been timely, a I | ||
recommendations, the utility should, in ed(ation to correcting or improving specific conditions, pursue underlying causes and issues. Additional wpporting details for selected I findings we provided in Appendix it. ! | |||
As a part of each station evaluation, the evaluation team follows up on ruponses to findini in previous ieports. Findings with response actlons that ate incomptete, but progtening on | |||
a reasonable schedule, are curled forward in Appendix ! to the report. In wees where additional improvements we needed, or where response actions have not been timely, a I | |||
ftom the previous report i | ftom the previous report i | ||
related finding that stands on its own merit is to which the new finding is related la listed with the new finding. o written. The findin[b r this report, t six findings related to previous findings and one finding carried forward in Appendix !. , | related finding that stands on its own merit is to which the new finding is related la listed with the new finding. o written. The findin[b r this report, t six findings related to previous findings and one finding carried forward in Appendix !. , | ||
i The findings listed herein were presented to Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation rne.agement at an exit meeting on April 19,1949 findings, recommendations, and responses wer,e discussed on June 15,1989, and the responses are considered satisfactory. , | i The findings listed herein were presented to Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation rne.agement at an exit meeting on April 19,1949 findings, recommendations, and responses wer,e discussed on June 15,1989, and the responses are considered satisfactory. , | ||
Line 74: | Line 48: | ||
!!), INPO requests a written status report by Janary 1990. A final update will be req six weeks prior to the next evaluation. In these status reports we request that Niagara l Mohawk Power Corporation provide an asseument of '.he effectiveness of corrective actions taken for those key findings that we reflected above in the "most significant weas in need of improvement.' | !!), INPO requests a written status report by Janary 1990. A final update will be req six weeks prior to the next evaluation. In these status reports we request that Niagara l Mohawk Power Corporation provide an asseument of '.he effectiveness of corrective actions taken for those key findings that we reflected above in the "most significant weas in need of improvement.' | ||
t a | t a | ||
l | l | ||
\ | \ | ||
l Y. #. *, | l Y. #. *, | ||
I b , | I b , | ||
W | W | ||
.- s | .- s NEWHOUSE ' NEWS SERVICE. f"<"cTE*4"' "si/llsmt NEWHOUlf NEW$PArtR$ StNwo$tItN$tAtta NARE$At!!Dft | ||
NEWHOUSE ' NEWS SERVICE. f"<"cTE*4"' "si/llsmt | |||
NEWHOUlf NEW$PArtR$ StNwo$tItN$tAtta NARE$At!!Dft | |||
' ' j SUITE 3930 e 2000 PENN$YtVANIA AVENUE, NW CR N R\PIDf n!H ftA hC^ | ' ' j SUITE 3930 e 2000 PENN$YtVANIA AVENUE, NW CR N R\PIDf n!H ftA hC^ | ||
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 [jj$$ "n".',"y% Nrw's !Pt/uI.*NNiwsov.wtws ; | WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 [jj$$ "n".',"y% Nrw's !Pt/uI.*NNiwsov.wtws ; | ||
(202) 785 c101 TELEX: 089 2341 gugly,i,jgs,,, g5g,ggps wo Ao g , | (202) 785 c101 TELEX: 089 2341 gugly,i,jgs,,, g5g,ggps wo Ao g , | ||
t fat e E m, C*n,W8", /4'J,tt"" : | t fat e E m, C*n,W8", /4'J,tt"" : | ||
7 ,.wn c. n.wnw, (Difot AND 9ett AU Chill D'ttCT OtAL 002 M.NN) | 7 ,.wn c. n.wnw, (Difot AND 9ett AU Chill D'ttCT OtAL 002 M.NN) | ||
AuEust 23, 1989 Nuclear _ Regulatory Commission IREEDOM OF INFORMATION 11555 Rockville Pike ACT REQUEST Rockville, Md. 20852 l | AuEust 23, 1989 Nuclear _ Regulatory Commission IREEDOM OF INFORMATION 11555 Rockville Pike ACT REQUEST Rockville, Md. 20852 l | ||
fora $f 3 N .; | fora $f 3 N .; | ||
To Whom It May Concern Q / ,7/-/f . | To Whom It May Concern Q / ,7/-/f . | ||
Under the Freedom of Information Act, I hereby request the ' | Under the Freedom of Information Act, I hereby request the ' | ||
following documents : ; | following documents : ; | ||
Line 112: | Line 68: | ||
1.- A report T2cm the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations , | 1.- A report T2cm the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations , | ||
about a spil) of radioactive waste at the Nine Mile Point I r.u cle ar powe r p' an t in S c riba , N .Y . | about a spil) of radioactive waste at the Nine Mile Point I r.u cle ar powe r p' an t in S c riba , N .Y . | ||
: 2. A11 memos, correspondence, findings, reports , and other information concerning the spill, which occurred between 1978 and | : 2. A11 memos, correspondence, findings, reports , and other information concerning the spill, which occurred between 1978 and 1 981 . | ||
1 981 . | |||
3., Any information concerning other spil7 s of radioactive | 3., Any information concerning other spil7 s of radioactive | ||
-waste at Nine Mile Point 1. This should include licensee event reports as well as other documents. - | -waste at Nine Mile Point 1. This should include licensee event reports as well as other documents. - | ||
Line 122: | Line 76: | ||
' ionathan D. Sa' ant | ' ionathan D. Sa' ant | ||
~ | ~ | ||
*+ a > -* | *+ a > -* | ||
RICION AL otFICt$ IN \TLANTA, CHIC ACO AND NEW 10RK | RICION AL otFICt$ IN \TLANTA, CHIC ACO AND NEW 10RK | ||
!}} | !}} |
Revision as of 16:20, 31 January 2020
ML19332C612 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Nine Mile Point ![]() |
Issue date: | 11/13/1989 |
From: | INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR POWER OPERATIONS |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML19332C604 | List: |
References | |
FOIA-89-374 NUDOCS 8911280346 | |
Download: ML19332C612 (2) | |
Text
'; *4 .
'y MMftscTttmtmtIBUT10.
/, Vt% )k
- NINE MILE PolNT (1945
,} N" Page I
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
The Institute of Nucleu Power Operations (INPC) conducted an evaluation of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 4 Nine Mlle Point Nucleu Station during the weeks of Mar and 20,1989. The station is located oppteximately seven miles east of Oswep, New York, on the southear2 shore of 1.ake Ontarlo. Unit 1 is a 610MTe (net) Cemral E,ectric bollin water reactor that began commercial operation In December IMt. Unit 2 to a 1.080 MTe (net) Ceneral Electric belling water teoctor that began commercla! operating in March 1988. During the evaluation, both units were in cold dwtdown, unit i in an extended outag . '
and unit 2 in a mainter.ance outage.
inic:tbn la 12 tc;cid wn d;le:cd .
in acco: dance witly,the freedom of informstlon Act, exemplicas _7 _.
F 0IA 9 1 O '/ ,
t l
l l
8911280346 891113 1 374 PDR SS$AN ~
l
- o. . ,-
- NINE MILE PotNT (l989)
. Page 4 ' ,
Findings and recommendations are listed under the performance objectives to which they pertain. Findings describe conditions that detract from meeting the performance ob Ives. Particularly noteworthy conditions that contribute to meeting perfortnance ob tives are identitled as good practices and strengths. Good practices we considered su fielently unique within the industry such that they would be useful to other utilities.
The recommendations following each fin (mg we Intended to assist the utility in ongoing efforto to Imptove all upects of its nuclew programs. In addressing thue findings and recommendations, the utility should, in ed(ation to correcting or improving specific conditions, pursue underlying causes and issues. Additional wpporting details for selected I findings we provided in Appendix it. !
As a part of each station evaluation, the evaluation team follows up on ruponses to findini in previous ieports. Findings with response actlons that ate incomptete, but progtening on a reasonable schedule, are curled forward in Appendix ! to the report. In wees where additional improvements we needed, or where response actions have not been timely, a I
ftom the previous report i
related finding that stands on its own merit is to which the new finding is related la listed with the new finding. o written. The findin[b r this report, t six findings related to previous findings and one finding carried forward in Appendix !. ,
i The findings listed herein were presented to Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation rne.agement at an exit meeting on April 19,1949 findings, recommendations, and responses wer,e discussed on June 15,1989, and the responses are considered satisfactory. ,
l To follow the timely completion of the Imptovements included in the responses and the Appendix ! items, and any 50ER recommendations evaluated as not satisfactory, includ each red tab 50ER recommendation received subsequent to this evaluation,(see Appendix
!!), INPO requests a written status report by Janary 1990. A final update will be req six weeks prior to the next evaluation. In these status reports we request that Niagara l Mohawk Power Corporation provide an asseument of '.he effectiveness of corrective actions taken for those key findings that we reflected above in the "most significant weas in need of improvement.'
t a
l
\
l Y. #. *,
I b ,
W
.- s NEWHOUSE ' NEWS SERVICE. f"<"cTE*4"' "si/llsmt NEWHOUlf NEW$PArtR$ StNwo$tItN$tAtta NARE$At!!Dft
' ' j SUITE 3930 e 2000 PENN$YtVANIA AVENUE, NW CR N R\PIDf n!H ftA hC^
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 [jj$$ "n".',"y% Nrw's !Pt/uI.*NNiwsov.wtws ;
(202) 785 c101 TELEX: 089 2341 gugly,i,jgs,,, g5g,ggps wo Ao g ,
t fat e E m, C*n,W8", /4'J,tt"" :
7 ,.wn c. n.wnw, (Difot AND 9ett AU Chill D'ttCT OtAL 002 M.NN)
AuEust 23, 1989 Nuclear _ Regulatory Commission IREEDOM OF INFORMATION 11555 Rockville Pike ACT REQUEST Rockville, Md. 20852 l
fora $f 3 N .;
To Whom It May Concern Q / ,7/-/f .
Under the Freedom of Information Act, I hereby request the '
following documents : ;
1.- A report T2cm the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations ,
about a spil) of radioactive waste at the Nine Mile Point I r.u cle ar powe r p' an t in S c riba , N .Y .
- 2. A11 memos, correspondence, findings, reports , and other information concerning the spill, which occurred between 1978 and 1 981 .
3., Any information concerning other spil7 s of radioactive
-waste at Nine Mile Point 1. This should include licensee event reports as well as other documents. -
Because this information is in the public intecos t, p? ease waive a13 ccpying and search fees.
Thank you for your prompt attention Yours tra)y,
&. , a te. J
' ionathan D. Sa' ant
~
- + a > -*
RICION AL otFICt$ IN \TLANTA, CHIC ACO AND NEW 10RK
!