ML18038A003: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 03/07/1985
| issue date = 03/07/1985
| title = Forwards Rev 1 to Vol 1, Summary & Conclusions, to Final Rept of Independent Review of Nine Mile 2 Related NRC Const Assessment Team Insps & SALP Rept & Niagara Mohawk Identified Deficiencies, Per 841114 Presentation
| title = Forwards Rev 1 to Vol 1, Summary & Conclusions, to Final Rept of Independent Review of Nine Mile 2 Related NRC Const Assessment Team Insps & SALP Rept & Niagara Mohawk Identified Deficiencies, Per 841114 Presentation
| author name = NORRIS J M
| author name = Norris J
| author affiliation = MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS CO.
| author affiliation = MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS CO.
| addressee name = MURLEY T
| addressee name = Murley T
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
| docket = 05000410
| docket = 05000410
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:0 NIAhVLCEIENEIITANALYSIS CONIPAMY                l267I HIGH BLUFF DRIVE, SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92I30      619/48l-3100 MAIL:P.O. BOX 85404, SAN DIEGO, CAUFORNIA 92I38 March 7, 1985 Dr. Thomas Murley United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King    of Prussia,        PA    19406
==Dear    Dr. Murley:==
In accordance with previous discussions with Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (NMPC) and Region I of the Nuclear Regulatory Commis-sion (NRC), Management Analysis Company (MAC) is submitting a revision to Volume I of the final report of the independent review of Nine Mile Point Unit 2 (NMP-2) related NRC CAT inspections, SALP report    and    NMPC    identified deficiencies.
The purpose        of this revision is to clarify the report                        and  to report data in the same manner as presented orally to NMPC and the NRC on November 14, 1984 and in the written interim reports for Phase I, II and    III.      The changes are consistent with detailed results of the review as shown in Volumes II and III of the report, which remain unchanged, and with supporting documentation in project records.
If there    are any questions relating to these changes,                          please contact me. I  will    be pleased to meet with the NRC and NMPC                        if necessary.
Sincerely, J. M. Norris Vice President JMN:rmc enc.~~~~~
03110427 850307 PDR      ADocs osoo04i0 9
REGIONAI.OFFICES:  l775 THE EXCHANGE, SUITE 450, ATIANTA,GEORGIA 30339      404/952-70I I 323 E. EISENHOWER PARKWAY, SUITE 206, ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 4B I04 320 I "C" STREET, SUITE 290, ANCHORAGE, ALASKA99503    907/562-6005 313/996-I000
                                                                                                                    /8- 4/
                  ~ L
"~~~+@-Roe(og
              ]
  '" -~e lo: os t}}

Latest revision as of 22:53, 21 October 2019

Forwards Rev 1 to Vol 1, Summary & Conclusions, to Final Rept of Independent Review of Nine Mile 2 Related NRC Const Assessment Team Insps & SALP Rept & Niagara Mohawk Identified Deficiencies, Per 841114 Presentation
ML18038A003
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/07/1985
From: Norris J
MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS CO.
To: Murley T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML17054B453 List:
References
NUDOCS 8503110427
Download: ML18038A003 (2)


Text

0 NIAhVLCEIENEIITANALYSIS CONIPAMY l267I HIGH BLUFF DRIVE, SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92I30 619/48l-3100 MAIL:P.O. BOX 85404, SAN DIEGO, CAUFORNIA 92I38 March 7, 1985 Dr. Thomas Murley United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406

Dear Dr. Murley:

In accordance with previous discussions with Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (NMPC) and Region I of the Nuclear Regulatory Commis-sion (NRC), Management Analysis Company (MAC) is submitting a revision to Volume I of the final report of the independent review of Nine Mile Point Unit 2 (NMP-2) related NRC CAT inspections, SALP report and NMPC identified deficiencies.

The purpose of this revision is to clarify the report and to report data in the same manner as presented orally to NMPC and the NRC on November 14, 1984 and in the written interim reports for Phase I, II and III. The changes are consistent with detailed results of the review as shown in Volumes II and III of the report, which remain unchanged, and with supporting documentation in project records.

If there are any questions relating to these changes, please contact me. I will be pleased to meet with the NRC and NMPC if necessary.

Sincerely, J. M. Norris Vice President JMN:rmc enc.~~~~~

03110427 850307 PDR ADocs osoo04i0 9

REGIONAI.OFFICES: l775 THE EXCHANGE, SUITE 450, ATIANTA,GEORGIA 30339 404/952-70I I 323 E. EISENHOWER PARKWAY, SUITE 206, ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 4B I04 320 I "C" STREET, SUITE 290, ANCHORAGE, ALASKA99503 907/562-6005 313/996-I000

/8- 4/

~ L

"~~~+@-Roe(og

]

'" -~e lo: os t