ML18030A108: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:REGUl A TORY INFORHATION DISTR I BUT ION S Y TEI'I (BIDS)ACCESSIO"i NTiR:800b020399 DOCS DATE: 80/05/27 NOTARIZED:
{{#Wiki_filter:REGUl A TORY INFORHATION DISTR           I BUT ION   SY TEI'I (BIDS)
NO FACIL:-Susquehanna Steam Electric Stations Unit is Pennsylva 50-388 usauehanna Steam Electric Stationi Unit 2s Pennsylva A~AUTHOR AFF IL I AT IOiu TR I ESCHt'R>'4P
ACCESSIO"i NTiR:800b020399                             DOCS DATE: 80/05/27     NOTARIZED:     NO FACIL:       -           Susquehanna             Steam   Electric Stations Unit is Pennsylva         05000387 50-388 usauehanna                       Steam   Electric Stationi Unit 2s Pennsylva         05000388 A     ~                               AUTHOR AFF IL I AT IOiu TR I ESCHt'R>'4P   'III
'III~E~A r my P Dept~0 f RECIP~NAI'>F.PECIP IENT AFFILIATION SELLSPD~E.Environmental Projects Branch 2  
                          ~ E ~       A r my P Dept ~ 0 f RECIP ~ NAI'>F.                       PECIP IENT AFFILIATION SELLSPD ~ E.                               Environmental Projects Branch         2


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Suhmits comments re DES draft suppl review.Clean Water Act conditions 4 mgt oractices re propose dam encl'ocument should address flood hazard of spillway overtopping.
Suhmits                                       Comments'OCKET comments re DES draft suppl review. Clean Water Act conditions 4 mgt oractices re propose dam encl'ocument flood hazard of     spillway   overtopping.
DISTPISUTION CODE: C0020 COPIES RECEIVED:LTP g ENCL Q SIZE: l'ITLE: Fnviron~Comments'OCKET 05000387 05000388 NOTES:M~A/g
should address DISTPISUTION CODE: C0020                           COPIES RECEIVED:LTP       g ENCL   Q     SIZE:
+0-g~+<~Z2E V,gEZ<~Ply'.RECIPIENT COPIES RECIP IENT I0 CODE/t'lA'>E I TTR ENCL IO CODE/NAl4E ACTION'5 PS<WlAEQ 1 1 17 8C 18 LA g~g~g 1 1 AD C COP IES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 0 INTERViAL:
l'ITLE: Fnviron             ~
01 tcEG F IL'7 e.10 CST R>'1F T ANL 13 HYDRU~i~ETEOR 15 EFLT TRT SYS 19 DIR DSE AO S I TE ANALY FXTERNAL: 03 LPDR 20 NATL LAB 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 5 5 02 NRC PQR 09 Ei>VN SPEC BR 12 GEOSCIE'l BR 10 ACDENT Ai'PALY ib RAD AS~T BR AD ENVIRON TECH)OELO 04"IS IC ACRS JUN 3 Neo TOTAL t4VHBER OF CQ.IES REQUIRED: LTTR 27 ENCL 22 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY BALTIMORE DISTRICT.CORPS OP ENGINEERS P.O.BOX I 71 5 BALTIMORE.
NOTES:M~A/g                 + 0- g ~+<                   ~Z2E V,gEZ         <~Ply'.
MARYLAND 21202 REPLY TO ATTKIITIOII OFs NABPL-E 27 May 19.80 Mr.Donald E.Sells Acting Branch Chief Environmental Projects Branch 2 Division of Site Safety&Environmental Analysis U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555
RECIPIENT                         COPIES             RECIP IENT             COP IES I0     CODE/t'lA'>E               I TTR ENCL       IO CODE/NAl4E           LTTR ENCL ACTION'5             PS<     WlAEQ                     1   1     17 8C                     1      1 18 LA           g~g~g                     1   1     AD     C                     1     0 INTERViAL: 01         tcEG       F IL'7 1    1    02 NRC PQR
: e.                           2    2    09 Ei>VN SPEC BR 10     CST R>'1F T ANL                     1    1      12 GEOSCIE'l BR 13     HYDRU~i~ETEOR                       1    1      10 ACDENT Ai'PALY 15     EFLT TRT SYS                       1    1      ib RAD AS~T BR 19     DIR DSE                             1    1    AD  ENVIRON TECH)
AO S I TE ANALY                                 0    OELO FXTERNAL: 03 LPDR                                         1   1     04 "IS IC 20 NATL LAB                                5    5    ACRS JUN     3 Neo TOTAL t4VHBER OF CQ. IES REQUIRED: LTTR                             27   ENCL     22


==Dear Mr.Sells:==
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY BALTIMORE DISTRICT. CORPS OP ENGINEERS P.O. BOX I 71 5 BALTIMORE. MARYLAND 21202 REPLY TO ATTKIITIOIIOFs NABPL-E                                                              27 May 19.80 Mr. Donald E. Sells Acting Branch Chief Environmental Projects Branch 2 Division of Site Safety & Environmental Analysis U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.        20555
Our office has reviewed the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units One and.Two, Draft Environmental Statement Draft Supplement, Conyngham Township of Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, in keeping with.this office's direct responsibility.
 
This agency's areas of concern are flood control hazard potentials,,permit requirements under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and other direct and indirect impacts on Corps of Engineers existing and/or proposed projects.In accordance with these responsibilities, our office has the following comments: a.The proposed dam is to be constructed in waters of the United States and is,, therefore, subject to the regulatory authority of this office.However, since the proposed dam is to be constructed above the headwaters of Pond Hill Creek, the work is authorized under the provisions of a Department of the Army Nationwide Permit.The attached'sheet describes the conditions which must be satisfied for the purposes of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and the Management Practices which should be followed, to the maximum extent practicable, in the discharges of dredged or fill material to minimize the adverse effects of these discharges on the aquatic environment.
==Dear Mr.       Sells:==
The proposed intake structure is to extend approximately 30 meters into the Susquehanna River, a navigable water of the United States, therefore, an individual Department of the Army permit for the intake would be required in accordance with Section 10 of the River and Harbor Act.b.As noted in 4.4.2.3, Hydrologic Design on Dam, page 4-11, the proposed spillway would be inadequate for passing the PMF using NRC criteria.Thus, a potential flood hazard would exist from failure of the dam due to overtopping.
 
The document should address this flood hazard.
Our office has reviewed the Susquehanna               Steam Electric Station, Units One and. Two, Draft Environmental Statement           Draft Supplement,   Conyngham Township of Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, in keeping with. this office's direct responsibility. This agency's areas of concern are flood control hazard potentials,,permit requirements under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and other direct and indirect impacts on Corps of Engineers existing and/or proposed projects. In accordance with these responsibilities, our office has the     following comments:
gABPL-E.Donald E.Sells 27 May 1980 Electric Station, Units One and Two, pro)act is The Susquehanna Steam ec isting upstream or ed to have adverse effects on any ex s n not anticipate o fl d tection prospects on the downstream Corps of Eng ineers local oo pro ng d C s of Engineers Susquehanna River.No othe ng other existing or propose orp is however, P rogects are n t e c n h vicinity.The Baltimore Distr ct s, o nductin the Cowanesque Lake Reformulation y Stud as an currently con uct ng e the Pond Hill Reservoir.
: a. The proposed dam is to be constructed in waters of the United States and is,, therefore, subject to the regulatory authority of this office. However, since the proposed dam is to be constructed above the headwaters of Pond Hill Creek, the work is authorized under the provisions of a Department of the Army Nationwide Permit. The attached 'sheet describes the conditions which must be satisfied for the purposes of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and the Management Practices which should be followed, to the maximum extent practicable, in the discharges of dredged or material to minimize the adverse effects of these discharges on the aquatic fill environment. The proposed intake structure is to extend approximately 30 meters into the Susquehanna River, a navigable water of the United States, therefore, an individual Department of the Army permit for the intake would be required in accordance with Section 10 of the River and Harbor Act.
alternative water supply source to t e on o ortunity to comment on the Draft Environmental
: b. As noted in 4.4.2.3, Hydrologic Design on Dam, page 4-11, the proposed spillway would be inadequate for passing the PMF using NRC criteria. Thus, a potential flood hazard would exist from failure of the dam due to overtopping. The document should address this flood hazard.
'Re appreciate the opportun ty n be of further assistance, Statement Draft Supplement and if we can e o ur e please contact us.Sincerely, l Incl As stated ILL E.CHEMI, Jr.Chief, Planning Division CRH)ZTTG<K I'~1.That tha discharge wi 11 not destroy a threatened or endangered species as ide'ntified under the Endangered Species Act, or endanger the critica1 habitat of such species;2.That the discharge will consist of suitable material free from toMc pollutants in other than trace quantities; 3.That the fill created by the discharge will be properly maintained to'revent erosion and other non-point sources of pollution; and 4 That the discharge will not occur in a component of the National.Wild and Scenic River System or in a component of a State Mld and.".,Scenic Mver System.+J''.'hNAGENER PRACTXCES I':-1.Discharges of dredged or M1 material into waters of the United States'..: should be avoided or minimized through the use of other practical alternatives-, f'2 Discharges in spawning areas during spawning seasons should be avoIded~.3.Discharges should not restrict or impede the movement of aquatic species~'ndigenous to the waters ox the passage of normal or e~ected h gh flows or cause the relocation of the waters (unless the prImary purpose of the fill is to impound waters)g*4~Xf t: he dischaige creates an impoundment of water, adverse icpacts on-the aquatic system caused by the accelerated passage of water and/or the restriction of its flow, should be minimized; 5.Discharges on wetlands areas should be avoided;6.Heavy equipment works in wetlands should be placed on mats;7.Discharges into breeding and nesting areas for migratory waterfowl should be avoided;and 8.All temporary fills should be removed in their entirety.}}
 
gABPL-E                                                       27 May 1980
    . Donald E. Sells The Susquehanna    Steam  Electric ec    Station, Units One and Two, pro)act is not anticipateed too have adverse effects on any ex istings n upstream or downstream Corps of Eng ineers local floo d pro tection prospects on the Susquehanna   River. No othe existing other        ng or propose d C orp s of Engineers P rogects are   n th e vicinity.
c n     The Baltimore Distr ct iss, however, o
currently connductin uct ng thee Cowanesque Lake Reformulation Stud y as an alternative water supply source to tthee Pond on Hill Reservoir.
'Re                  o ortunity appreciate the opportun    ty to comment on the Draft Environmental Statement Draft Supplement and     if we cann bee oof further ur e assistance, please contact us.
Sincerely, l Incl                                       ILL     E.       CHEMI, Jr.
As  stated                                  Chief, Planning Division
 
CRH)ZTTG<K I'       ~ 1. That tha discharge wi11 not destroy a threatened or endangered species as ide'ntified under the Endangered Species Act, or endanger the critica1 habitat of such species;
: 2. That the discharge will consist of suitable material free from toMc pollutants in other than trace quantities;
: 3. That the   fillcreated to'revent erosion by the discharge will be properly maintained and other non-point sources of pollution; and 4   That the discharge will not occur in a component of the National.
Wild and Scenic River System or in a component of a State Mld and.
  "     .,Scenic Mver System.
                                                                                              +J
                                    '. 'hNAGENER   PRACTXCES I
      ':- 1 . Discharges of dredged or M1 material into waters of the United States
    '..: should be avoided or minimized through the use of other practical alternatives-,f' 2   Discharges in spawning areas during spawning seasons should be avoIded ~ .
: 3. Discharges should not restrict or impede the movement of aquatic species
  ~     'ndigenous to the waters ox the passage of normal or e~ected h gh flows or cause the relocation of the waters (unless the prImary purpose of the is to impound waters)g fill 4 ~ Xf t:he dischaige creates an impoundment of water, adverse icpacts on
          - the aquatic system caused by the accelerated passage of water and/or the restriction of its flow,     should be minimized;
: 5. Discharges on wetlands areas should be avoided;
: 6. Heavy equipment     works in wetlands     should be placed on mats;
: 7. Discharges into breeding and nesting areas for migratory waterfowl should be avoided; and
: 8. All temporary fills should     be removed in their entirety.}}

Latest revision as of 17:26, 3 February 2020

Submits Comments Re Des Draft Suppl Review.Clean Water Act Conditions & Mgt Practices Re Proposed Dam Encl.Document Should Address Flood Hazard of Spillway Overtopping
ML18030A108
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/27/1980
From: Trieschman W
ARMY, DEPT. OF
To: Sells D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NABPL-E, NUDOCS 8006020399
Download: ML18030A108 (5)


Text

REGUl A TORY INFORHATION DISTR I BUT ION SY TEI'I (BIDS)

ACCESSIO"i NTiR:800b020399 DOCS DATE: 80/05/27 NOTARIZED: NO FACIL: - Susquehanna Steam Electric Stations Unit is Pennsylva 05000387 50-388 usauehanna Steam Electric Stationi Unit 2s Pennsylva 05000388 A ~ AUTHOR AFF IL I AT IOiu TR I ESCHt'R>'4P 'III

~ E ~ A r my P Dept ~ 0 f RECIP ~ NAI'>F. PECIP IENT AFFILIATION SELLSPD ~ E. Environmental Projects Branch 2

SUBJECT:

Suhmits Comments'OCKET comments re DES draft suppl review. Clean Water Act conditions 4 mgt oractices re propose dam encl'ocument flood hazard of spillway overtopping.

should address DISTPISUTION CODE: C0020 COPIES RECEIVED:LTP g ENCL Q SIZE:

l'ITLE: Fnviron ~

NOTES:M~A/g + 0- g ~+< ~Z2E V,gEZ <~Ply'.

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIP IENT COP IES I0 CODE/t'lA'>E I TTR ENCL IO CODE/NAl4E LTTR ENCL ACTION'5 PS< WlAEQ 1 1 17 8C 1 1 18 LA g~g~g 1 1 AD C 1 0 INTERViAL: 01 tcEG F IL'7 1 1 02 NRC PQR

e. 2 2 09 Ei>VN SPEC BR 10 CST R>'1F T ANL 1 1 12 GEOSCIE'l BR 13 HYDRU~i~ETEOR 1 1 10 ACDENT Ai'PALY 15 EFLT TRT SYS 1 1 ib RAD AS~T BR 19 DIR DSE 1 1 AD ENVIRON TECH)

AO S I TE ANALY 0 OELO FXTERNAL: 03 LPDR 1 1 04 "IS IC 20 NATL LAB 5 5 ACRS JUN 3 Neo TOTAL t4VHBER OF CQ. IES REQUIRED: LTTR 27 ENCL 22

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY BALTIMORE DISTRICT. CORPS OP ENGINEERS P.O. BOX I 71 5 BALTIMORE. MARYLAND 21202 REPLY TO ATTKIITIOIIOFs NABPL-E 27 May 19.80 Mr. Donald E. Sells Acting Branch Chief Environmental Projects Branch 2 Division of Site Safety & Environmental Analysis U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Mr. Sells:

Our office has reviewed the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units One and. Two, Draft Environmental Statement Draft Supplement, Conyngham Township of Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, in keeping with. this office's direct responsibility. This agency's areas of concern are flood control hazard potentials,,permit requirements under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and other direct and indirect impacts on Corps of Engineers existing and/or proposed projects. In accordance with these responsibilities, our office has the following comments:

a. The proposed dam is to be constructed in waters of the United States and is,, therefore, subject to the regulatory authority of this office. However, since the proposed dam is to be constructed above the headwaters of Pond Hill Creek, the work is authorized under the provisions of a Department of the Army Nationwide Permit. The attached 'sheet describes the conditions which must be satisfied for the purposes of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and the Management Practices which should be followed, to the maximum extent practicable, in the discharges of dredged or material to minimize the adverse effects of these discharges on the aquatic fill environment. The proposed intake structure is to extend approximately 30 meters into the Susquehanna River, a navigable water of the United States, therefore, an individual Department of the Army permit for the intake would be required in accordance with Section 10 of the River and Harbor Act.
b. As noted in 4.4.2.3, Hydrologic Design on Dam, page 4-11, the proposed spillway would be inadequate for passing the PMF using NRC criteria. Thus, a potential flood hazard would exist from failure of the dam due to overtopping. The document should address this flood hazard.

gABPL-E 27 May 1980

. Donald E. Sells The Susquehanna Steam Electric ec Station, Units One and Two, pro)act is not anticipateed too have adverse effects on any ex istings n upstream or downstream Corps of Eng ineers local floo d pro tection prospects on the Susquehanna River. No othe existing other ng or propose d C orp s of Engineers P rogects are n th e vicinity.

c n The Baltimore Distr ct iss, however, o

currently connductin uct ng thee Cowanesque Lake Reformulation Stud y as an alternative water supply source to tthee Pond on Hill Reservoir.

'Re o ortunity appreciate the opportun ty to comment on the Draft Environmental Statement Draft Supplement and if we cann bee oof further ur e assistance, please contact us.

Sincerely, l Incl ILL E. CHEMI, Jr.

As stated Chief, Planning Division

CRH)ZTTG<K I' ~ 1. That tha discharge wi11 not destroy a threatened or endangered species as ide'ntified under the Endangered Species Act, or endanger the critica1 habitat of such species;

2. That the discharge will consist of suitable material free from toMc pollutants in other than trace quantities;
3. That the fillcreated to'revent erosion by the discharge will be properly maintained and other non-point sources of pollution; and 4 That the discharge will not occur in a component of the National.

Wild and Scenic River System or in a component of a State Mld and.

" .,Scenic Mver System.

+J

'. 'hNAGENER PRACTXCES I

':- 1 . Discharges of dredged or M1 material into waters of the United States

'..: should be avoided or minimized through the use of other practical alternatives-,f' 2 Discharges in spawning areas during spawning seasons should be avoIded ~ .

3. Discharges should not restrict or impede the movement of aquatic species

~ 'ndigenous to the waters ox the passage of normal or e~ected h gh flows or cause the relocation of the waters (unless the prImary purpose of the is to impound waters)g fill 4 ~ Xf t:he dischaige creates an impoundment of water, adverse icpacts on

- the aquatic system caused by the accelerated passage of water and/or the restriction of its flow, should be minimized;

5. Discharges on wetlands areas should be avoided;
6. Heavy equipment works in wetlands should be placed on mats;
7. Discharges into breeding and nesting areas for migratory waterfowl should be avoided; and
8. All temporary fills should be removed in their entirety.