ML18030A288
| ML18030A288 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 05/15/1981 |
| From: | Heinemann J FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION |
| To: | Youngblood B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8105220273 | |
| Download: ML18030A288 (2) | |
Text
0 REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (R IDS)
ACCESSION NBR ~ 81 052202'73'OC o DATE e 8 1 /05/ 1 5 NOTARIZED~
NO DOCKET ¹ FACIL:50 387 Susquehanna Steam Electric Stations Unit 1> Pe~nsylva 0500 50 388 Susquehanna.
Steam Electric Station> Unit 2< Pennsylva 4Y~~
AUTH ~ NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION HEINEMANN>J,MD Federal Fnerqy Regulatory Commission REC IP ~ SAME REC IP IENT AFFI'LI ATION YOUNGBLOODEB ~ J.
Licensing, Branch 1
SUBJECT:
Comments on DES per 810331 oreoared by other agencies natur al qas 8 oil Rigel ine.
exist-if action-undertaken'equest;Review consists of EIS in areas" of electric oowerP industries;No significant impacts DISTRIBUTION CODE, COO?S COPIES RECEIVED:LTRj ENCL SIZE
TITLE.
Ehv i r on ~
Commen ts;,
NOTES':Send IEE 3-cociies FSAR 8 al l amends,1 cy:BWR"LRG PM(L ~ RIB)
Send ISE 3 copies FSAR 5 all amends,1 cytBWR LRG PM(L ~ RIB) 05000387 05000388 RECIPIENT'D CODE/NAME; ACTION."
LIC BR
~2 BC 17 INTERNAL: ACCIDNT EVAL BR ENV ENG BR 09 HYDRO~GEO BR NRC PDR'2 RAD ASSESSMT BR SIT ANAL RR 10 COPIES LTTR ENCL 7
1 1
1 1,
1 1.
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME STARKERS'-
05 EF TREAT SYS BR HYD/GEO BR IHE'7 0E~L R ~EW 01 T
FINANCE BR COPIES LTTR ENCL EXTERNAL! ACRS NATL LAB 20 1
5 LPDR
%SIC 03 04
~gg Qg. gg
$ 0 Q
'TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIREDi LTTR
+...ENCL.,",
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON 20426 IN REPLY REFER TO(
~iay 15, 1981 Mr. B. J. Youngblood Chief, Licensing Branch No.
1 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555
Dear Mr. Youngblood:
I am replying to your request of March 31, 1981 to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for comments on the Dx'aft Env'nmental Impact. Statement related to the operation of the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2.
This Draft EIS has been reviewed by appropriate FERC staff components upon whose evaluation this response is based.
This staff concentrates its review of other agencies'n-vironmental impact statements basically on those areas of the electric powex, natural gas, and oil pipeline industries for which the Commission has jurisdiction by law, or where staff has special expertise in evaluating environmental impacts in-voled with the proposed action. It does not appear that there would be any significant impacts in these areas of concern nor serious conflicts with this agency's responsibilities should this action be undertaken.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this statement.
, IN>>
jan)
Sincerely,,
ack M. Heinemann Advisor on Environmental Quality if.
J ~
~
18gO22n