ML17261B136: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 20: Line 20:
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
DEMONSTRATION
DEMONSTRATION
SYSTEMREGULATORY
SYSTEM REGULATORY
INFORMATION
INFORMATION
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM(RIDS)ACCESSION
SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9008230157
NBR:9008230157
DOC.DATE: 90/08/14 NOTARIZED:
DOC.DATE:
NO FACIL:50-244
90/08/14NOTARIZED:
Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION
NOFACIL:50-244
RobertEmmetGinnaNuclearPlant,Unit1,Rochester
GAUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATION
MECREDY,R.C.
MECREDY,R.C.
Rochester
Rochester Gas 6 Electric iCorp.RECIP.NAME
Gas6ElectriciCorp.RECIP.NAME
RECIPIENT AFFILIATION
RECIPIENT
AFFILIATION
MARTIN,T.T.
MARTIN,T.T.
Region1(Post820201)SUBJECT:Respondstocommitment
Region 1 (Post 820201)SUBJECT: Responds to commitment
trackingconcernsnotedinInspRept50-244/90-09.
tracking concerns noted in Insp Rept 50-244/90-09.
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
CODE:IEOIDCOPIESRECEIVEDLTRiENCLJSIZE:TITLE:General(50Dkt)-Insp
CODE: IEOID COPIES RECEIVED LTR i ENCL J SIZE: TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice
Rept/Notice
of Violation Response DOCKET PT 05000244 NOTES:License
ofViolation
Exp date in accordance
ResponseDOCKETPT05000244NOTES:License
with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72).
Expdateinaccordance
05000244 1'NTERNAL:
with10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72).
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-3 PD AEOD AEOD/TPAD NRR MORISSEAUi
050002441'NTERNAL:
D NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10
RECIPIENT
IDCODE/NAME
PD1-3PDAEODAEOD/TPAD
NRRMORISSEAUi
DNRR/DLPQ/LPEB10
NRR/DREP/PEPB9D
NRR/DREP/PEPB9D
NRR/DST/DIR
NRR/DST/DIR
8E2NUDOCS-ABSTRACT
8E2 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT
OGC/HDS2RGN1FILE01COPIESRECIPIENT
OGC/HDS2 RGN1 FILE 01 COPIES RECIPIENT LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME 1 1 JOHNSON,A 1 AEOD/DEIIB
LTTRENCLIDCODE/NAME
1 DEDRO 1 NRR SHANKMAN,S
11JOHNSON,A
1 NRR/DOEA DIR 11 1 NRR/DRIS/DIR
1AEOD/DEIIB
1 NRR/PMAS/ILRB12
1DEDRO1NRRSHANKMAN,S
1 OE@3X 1 ECj FI 02 1 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXTERNAL: LPDR NSIC 1 1 NRC 1 1 PDR po$5f ggq lf/0/R D NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
1NRR/DOEADIR111NRR/DRIS/DIR
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE!CONTA'CT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT.20079)TO ELIMINATE YOUR'NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION
1NRR/PMAS/ILRB12
LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 22 ENCL 22
1OE@3X1ECjFI021COPIESLTTRENCL111111111111111111EXTERNAL:
c lee ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION
LPDRNSIC11NRC11PDRpo$5fggqlf/0/RDNOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:
4 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER N.Y.14649 0001 ROBE'RT C.,r tFCREOY Vice t'rertdent
PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEWASTE!CONTA'CTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK,ROOMPl-37(EXT.20079)TOELIMINATE
(,irma Nuctear Vrnerrrttrrn
YOUR'NAME
FROMDISTRIBUTION
LISTSFORDOCUMENTS
YOUDON'TNEED!TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:
LTTR22ENCL22
cleeROCHESTER
GASANDELECTRICCORPORATION
489EASTAVENUE,ROCHESTER
N.Y.146490001ROBE'RTC.,rtFCREOYVicet'rertdent
(,irmaNuctearVrnerrrttrrn
'tEt.Etrrro
'tEt.Etrrro
NEaREaCOoEate546.2700August14,1990Mr.ThomasT.MartinRegionalAdministrator
NE aREa COoE ate 546.2700 August 14, 1990 Mr.Thomas T.Martin Regional Administrator
U.S.NuclearRegulatory
U.S.Nuclear Regulatory
Commission
Commission
RegionI475Allendale
Region I 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
RoadKingofPrussia,Pennsylvania
19406 SUBJECT: Inspection
19406SUBJECT:Inspection
Report 50-244/90-09
Report50-244/90-09
R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No.50-244 Dear Mr.Martin: This letter provides our response to the commitment
R.E.GinnaNuclearPowerPlantDocketNo.50-244DearMr.Martin:Thisletterprovidesourresponsetothecommitment
tracking concerns identified
trackingconcernsidentified
in the subject inspection
inthesubjectinspection
report, and of our planned corrective
report,andofourplannedcorrective
actions.(See Enclosure 1)We are also confirming
actions.(SeeEnclosure
our commitments, including dates when our actions will be completed, for the implementation
1)Wearealsoconfirming
of an effective shelf life program and a comprehensive
ourcommitments,
including
dateswhenouractionswillbecompleted,
fortheimplementation
ofaneffective
shelflifeprogramandacomprehensive
preventive
preventive
maintenance
maintenance
programforspareparts.(SeeEnclosures
program for spare parts.(See Enclosures
2and3)RG&Ewillbepleasedtoprovideadditional
2 and 3)RG&E will be pleased to provide additional
information
information
toassisttheNRCinyourreviewofRG&E'scompliance
to assist the NRC in your review of RG&E's compliance
andperformance
and performance
inthesematters.Verytrulyyours,~Cg~+RobertC.MecredyEncs.xc:U.S.NuclearRegulatory
in these matters.Very truly yours,~Cg~+Robert C.Mecredy Encs.xc: U.S.Nuclear Regulatory
Commission
Commission (Original)
(Original)
Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 Ginna NRC Senior Resident Inspector t9."6~;.i K O;OOO244 r)O(57 90O814 PDR ADQC pDC 9
DocumentControlDeskWashington,
D.C.20555GinnaNRCSeniorResidentInspector
t9."6~;.i
KO;OOO244r)O(5790O814PDRADQCpDC9
e  
e  
ENCLOSURE
ENCLOSURE 1 COMMITMENT
1COMMITMENT
TRACKING PAGE 1 OF 4 INTRODUCTION
TRACKINGPAGE1OF4INTRODUCTION
Detail 6.9 of Inspection
Detail6.9ofInspection
Report 50-244/90-09
Report50-244/90-09
concluded that the commitment
concluded
tracking system at Ginna may not be fully effective because there are no apparent plans for addressing
thatthecommitment
certain items.Report Detail 7.1 identified
trackingsystematGinnamaynotbefullyeffective
an apparent prolonged failure to meet a commitment (to maintain the excess letdown heat exchanger component cooling water return line containment
becausetherearenoapparentplansforaddressing
isolation valve as normally closed).The Inspection
certainitems.ReportDetail7.1identified
Report cover letter requested that we evaluate the above matters, that we inform you of the assessment
anapparentprolonged
of our ability to meet and adhere to similar safety commitments, and of any planned corrective
failuretomeetacommitment
actions.Both Inspection
(tomaintaintheexcessletdownheatexchanger
Report Details 6.9 and 7.1 address the implementation
component
and maintenance
coolingwaterreturnlinecontainment
of commitments.
isolation
However, the concerns identified
valveasnormallyclosed).TheInspection
in Report Detail 6.9 apply to commitments
Reportcoverletterrequested
which typically require a one-time action to complete (e.g., NRC Violations, Unresolved
thatweevaluatetheabovematters,thatweinformyouoftheassessment
Items, Deviations).
ofourabilitytomeetandadheretosimilarsafetycommitments,
Report Detail 7.1 applies to design commitments
andofanyplannedcorrective
which require continual cognizance
actions.BothInspection
and implementation (e.g., operating AOV-745 as normally closed).Each of the above commitment
ReportDetails6.9and7.1addresstheimplementation
andmaintenance
ofcommitments.
However,theconcernsidentified
inReportDetail6.9applytocommitments
whichtypically
requireaone-timeactiontocomplete(e.g.,NRCViolations,
Unresolved
Items,Deviations).
ReportDetail7.1appliestodesigncommitments
whichrequirecontinual
cognizance
andimplementation
(e.g.,operating
AOV-745asnormallyclosed).Eachoftheabovecommitment
categories
categories
requireuniqueimplementation
require unique implementation
andmaintenance
and maintenance
processes.
processes.
Accordingly,
Accordingly, our corrective
ourcorrective
actions will include separate methods for tracking each of the above categories
actionswillincludeseparatemethodsfortrackingeachoftheabovecategories
of commitments.
ofcommitments.
We believe that both of our methods will provide us with a higher.level of assurance that commitments
Webelievethatbothofourmethodswillprovideuswithahigher.levelofassurance
are being maintained
thatcommitments
as well as providing a more efficient means of tracking commitment-
arebeingmaintained
related information.
aswellasproviding
Both of our methods are discussed below.The section titled Commitment
amoreefficient
and Action Trackin S stem outlines our approach to track the one-time action commitments
meansoftrackingcommitment-
that are discussed in Report Detail 6.9.The second section titled Desicen Basis Documents outlines our approach to tracking design commitments
relatedinformation.
discussed in Report Detail 7.1.RG&E's Commitment
Bothofourmethodsarediscussed
and Action Tracking System (CATS)which has been under development
below.ThesectiontitledCommitment
since 1989, is not the tracking system which was reviewed and identified
andActionTrackinSstemoutlinesourapproachtotracktheone-timeactioncommitments
in Report.Detail 6.9.RG&E has developed the plans, is developing
thatarediscussed
the mainframe software, and will provide the necessary organization
inReportDetail6.9.ThesecondsectiontitledDesicenBasisDocuments
which will allow for the integration
outlinesourapproachtotrackingdesigncommitments
of a number of current tracking systems, one of which was reviewed in Report Detail 6.9, into a single system for regulatory
discussed
and other types of commitments.  
inReportDetail7.1.RG&E'sCommitment
andActionTrackingSystem(CATS)whichhasbeenunderdevelopment
since1989,isnotthetrackingsystemwhichwasreviewedandidentified
inReport.Detail6.9.RG&Ehasdeveloped
theplans,isdeveloping
themainframe
software,
andwillprovidethenecessary
organization
whichwillallowfortheintegration
ofanumberofcurrenttrackingsystems,oneofwhichwasreviewedinReportDetail6.9,intoasinglesystemforregulatory
andothertypesofcommitments.  
   
   
ENCLOSURE
ENCLOSURE 1 (Continued)
1(Continued)
COMMITMENT
COMMITMENT
ANDACTIONTRACKINGSYSTEMCATSPAGE2OF4RG&Ehaspreviously
AND ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM CATS PAGE 2 OF 4 RG&E has previously
recognized
recognized
thestatedshortcomings
the stated shortcomings
withourcurrentcommitment
with our current commitment
trackingmethods.ToaddressthisissueandconcernsnotedinInspection
tracking methods.To address this issue and concerns noted in Inspection
Reports88-15and89-05,aCommitment
Reports 88-15 and 89-05, a Commitment
TrackingAssessment
Tracking Assessment
wascompleted
was completed in January, 1989.Subsequent
inJanuary,1989.Subsequent
to the assessment, the RG&E Commitment
totheassessment,
and Action Tracking System (CATS)Project Plan was developed and approved by RG&E's Senior Management
theRG&ECommitment
in October, 1989.Development
andActionTrackingSystem(CATS)ProjectPlanwasdeveloped
of our upgraded tracking system is progressing.
andapprovedbyRG&E'sSeniorManagement
As noted at.the March 6, 1990 NRC Region I-RG&E Management
inOctober,1989.Development
Meeting, the anticipated
ofourupgradedtrackingsystemisprogressing.
Asnotedat.theMarch6,1990NRCRegionI-RG&EManagement
Meeting,theanticipated
implementation
implementation
scheduleforthetrackingsystemisMay29,1991(Reference
schedule for the tracking system is May 29, 1991 (Reference
RG&EConfiguration
RG&E Configuration
Management
Management
LevelIScheduleincludedinthemeetinghandoutswhichareattachedtoInspection
Level I Schedule included in the meeting handouts which are attached to Inspection
Report50-244/90-03,
Report 50-244/90-03, dated April 18, 1990).The following provides a brief description
datedApril18,1990).Thefollowing
of some of the features of the Commitment
providesabriefdescription
and Action Tracking System (CATS): COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE
ofsomeofthefeaturesoftheCommitment
CATS will reside on our Data General mainframe computer.The use of the mainframe will allow access to up-to-date
andActionTrackingSystem(CATS):COMPUTERHARDWARE/SOFTWARE
CATSwillresideonourDataGeneralmainframe
computer.
Theuseofthemainframe
willallowaccesstoup-to-date
commitment
commitment
databybothplantandcorporate
data by both plant and corporate Nuclear Division personnel.
NuclearDivisionpersonnel.
The upgraded tracking system will significantly
Theupgradedtrackingsystemwillsignificantly
expand the types of data elements being tracked.Data elements include, but are not limited to: responsible
expandthetypesofdataelementsbeingtracked.Dataelementsinclude,butarenotlimitedto:responsible
department
department
andindividual;
and individual;
documentinformation
document information
suchassourceofthecommitment,
such as source of the commitment, related documents, and implementing/closure
relateddocuments,
andimplementing/closure
documents;
documents;
duedateandpriority;
due date and priority;RG&E and agency closure dates;status;agency;cause;plant systems/structures;
RG&Eandagencyclosuredates;status;agency;cause;plantsystems/structures;
keywords;related commitments;
keywords;
summary and detailed text of the commitment;
relatedcommitments;
and comments.Each commitment
summaryanddetailedtextofthecommitment;
will also include an activities
andcomments.
section which will allow for development
Eachcommitment
of action plans where necessary.
willalsoincludeanactivities
The activities
sectionwhichwillallowfordevelopment
section includes: activity number;department
ofactionplanswherenecessary.
and individual;
Theactivities
sectionincludes:
activitynumber;department
andindividual;
description
description
ofactivity;
of activity;target completion
targetcompletion
date and actual completion
dateandactualcompletion
date;and activity status.The software design includes menus to allow for various types of reports to be easily requested by Nuclear Division personnel.
date;andactivitystatus.Thesoftwaredesignincludesmenustoallowforvarioustypesofreportstobeeasilyrequested
User Manuals will be developed to aid personnel in the use of the system.The Detailed Software Design for the CATS is currently under development.  
byNuclearDivisionpersonnel.
ENCLOSURE 1 (Continued)
UserManualswillbedeveloped
PAGE, 3 OF 4 DATABASE Our established
toaidpersonnel
goal is to provide an integrated
intheuseofthesystem.TheDetailedSoftwareDesignfortheCATSiscurrently
database of potentially
underdevelopment.  
safety significant
ENCLOSURE
issues which originate from various sources.At the time the system goes operational, the database wi'll, at a minimum, consist of those open commitments
1(Continued)
which originated
PAGE,3OF4DATABASEOurestablished
in correspondence
goalistoprovideanintegrated
to or from the NRC.In our current plans, we expect to expand the database to include other commitments/action
databaseofpotentially
items from documents such as Corrective
safetysignificant
Action Reports, Identified
issueswhichoriginate
fromvarioussources.Atthetimethesystemgoesoperational,
thedatabasewi'll,ataminimum,consistofthoseopencommitments
whichoriginated
incorrespondence
toorfromtheNRC.Inourcurrentplans,weexpecttoexpandthedatabasetoincludeothercommitments/action
itemsfromdocuments
suchasCorrective
ActionReports,Identified
Deficiency
Deficiency
Reports,Nonconformance
Reports, Nonconformance
Reports,Management
Reports, Management
ActionItems,otherfederal,state,andlocalregulatory
Action Items, other federal, state, and local regulatory
agencycorrespondence,
agency correspondence, INPO Evaluations, and INPO generic industry correspondence (e.g., SOERs, SERs, etc.)The extent of the items to be addressed by CATS has not yet been finalized.
INPOEvaluations,
To allow for the building of a commitment
andINPOgenericindustrycorrespondence
database concurrent
(e.g.,SOERs,SERs,etc.)Theextentoftheitemstobeaddressed
with the development
byCATShasnotyetbeenfinalized.
of the mainframe software, a PC based tracking system was developed in the Nuclear Safety and Licensing Group as an interim measure until the mainframe system implementation.
Toallowforthebuildingofacommitment
Reports generated from this interim system have the essential data elements and appearance
databaseconcurrent
that reports generated from the mainframe will have, with the exception that the activities
withthedevelopment
section discussed in Section 1 above was excluded.Currently, the PC database includes commitments/action
ofthemainframe
items which originated
software,
in correspondence
aPCbasedtrackingsystemwasdeveloped
to and from the NRC dated subsequent
intheNuclearSafetyandLicensing
to January 1, 1990.The database also includes a number of commitments
Groupasaninterimmeasureuntilthemainframe
which originated
systemimplementation.
prior to 1990 yet remained open.We are conducting
Reportsgenerated
fromthisinterimsystemhavetheessential
dataelementsandappearance
thatreportsgenerated
fromthemainframe
willhave,withtheexception
thattheactivities
sectiondiscussed
inSection1abovewasexcluded.
Currently,
thePCdatabaseincludescommitments/action
itemswhichoriginated
incorrespondence
toandfromtheNRCdatedsubsequent
toJanuary1,1990.Thedatabasealsoincludesanumberofcommitments
whichoriginated
priorto1990yetremainedopen.Weareconducting
additional
additional
reviewsofourcurrenttrackingsystemstoidentifypre-1990commitments
reviews of our current tracking systems to identify pre-1990 commitments
whichremainopen.ThesereviewsshouldassurethatopenNRCissuesareidentified
which remain open.These reviews should assure that open NRC issues are identified
andincludedinthedatabaseatthetimethemainframe
and included in the database at the time the mainframe system becomes operational.
systembecomesoperational.
It is our intent to retain closed commitments
Itisourintenttoretainclosedcommitments
in the database to facilitate
inthedatabasetofacilitate
future historical
futurehistorical
research of issues.The database that exists on the PC will be incorporated
researchofissues.ThedatabasethatexistsonthePCwillbeincorporated
into the mainframe computer system at the time of its implementation.  
intothemainframe
computersystematthetimeofitsimplementation.  
k  
k  
ENCLOSURE
ENCLOSURE 1 (Continued)
1(Continued)
PAGE 4 OF 4 3~MANAGEMENT
PAGE4OF43~MANAGEMENT
CONTROLS The Commitment
CONTROLSTheCommitment
and Action Tracking System will provide assurance to management
andActionTrackingSystemwillprovideassurance
that safety significant
tomanagement
issues are being addressed.
thatsafetysignificant
In addition to tracking the commitment/action
issuesarebeingaddressed.
items, the system will allow action plans with appropriate
Inadditiontotrackingthecommitment/action
target completion
items,thesystemwillallowactionplanswithappropriate
dates to be established.
targetcompletion
Periodic reports to management
datestobeestablished.
and line personnel showing issues overdue and coming due are planned.Administrative
Periodicreportstomanagement
controls and implementing
andlinepersonnel
showingissuesoverdueandcomingdueareplanned.Administrative
controlsandimplementing
procedures
procedures
arescheduled
are scheduled to be developed prior to full system implementation.
tobedeveloped
These administrative
priortofullsystemimplementation.
controls will establish responsibilities
Theseadministrative
for the maintenance
controlswillestablish
and implementation
responsibilities
of commitments.
forthemaintenance
andimplementation
ofcommitments.
Sufficient
Sufficient
progresshasbeenmadeonourdevelopment
progress has been made on our development
toallowustostartthedistribution
to allow us to start the distribution
ofthesignificant
of the significant
commitment
commitment
reportsfromtheinterimPCsystem.Atthistime,thesereportsarebeingusedtosupplement
reports from the interim PC system.At this time, these reports are being used to supplement
information
information
fromothersystemsandprovideahigherlevelofconfidence
from other systems and provide a higher level of confidence
thatcommitments
that commitments
arebeingmet.DESIGNBASISDOCUMENTS
are being met.DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS As noted at the March 6, 1990 NRC Region I-RG&E Management
AsnotedattheMarch6,1990NRCRegionI-RG&EManagement
Meeting, the RG&E Configuration
Meeting,theRG&EConfiguration
Management
Management
LevelIScheduleshowsaJune16,1990startdatefortheDesignBasisDocuments
Level I Schedule shows a June 16, 1990 start date for the Design Basis Documents (DBDs)and a completion
(DBDs)andacompletion
date of November 21, 1994.The Design Basis Documents (DBDs)currently being developed for use by Engineering
dateofNovember21,1994.TheDesignBasisDocuments
and Ginna Station personnel will contain or reference the Design Basis and Licensing commitments
(DBDs)currently
beingdeveloped
forusebyEngineering
andGinnaStationpersonnel
willcontainorreference
theDesignBasisandLicensing
commitments
applicable
applicable
tothestructures,
to the structures, systems and components
systemsandcomponents
contained within them.The DBDs will be controlled
contained
so that they will accurately
withinthem.TheDBDswillbecontrolled
reflect the up-to-date
sothattheywillaccurately
Design Basis and commitments.
reflecttheup-to-date
They will provide the required reference documents for Engineering
DesignBasisandcommitments.
and Ginna Station personnel to ensure that proposed modifications
Theywillprovidetherequiredreference
are properly reviewed and that the Design Basis and ongoing commitments
documents
are properly maintained
forEngineering
at Ginna Station.This will reduce the probability
andGinnaStationpersonnel
of future occurrences
toensurethatproposedmodifications
such as the improperly
areproperlyreviewedandthattheDesignBasisandongoingcommitments
areproperlymaintained
atGinnaStation.Thiswillreducetheprobability
offutureoccurrences
suchastheimproperly
positioned
positioned
valvedescribed
valve described in Section 7.1 of the inspection
inSection7.1oftheinspection
report.As previously
report.Aspreviously
noted in NRC correspondence
notedinNRCcorrespondence
and conversations, the DBD effort a recently initiated documentation
andconversations,
program.It will be performed in a systematic
theDBDeffortarecentlyinitiated
fashion, with the most important systems and topics receiving higher priority.  
documentation
f 1 0
program.Itwillbeperformed
ENCLOSURE 2 PAGE 1 OF 1 VIOLATION 50-244/87-10-04
inasystematic
fashion,withthemostimportant
systemsandtopicsreceiving
higherpriority.  
f10
ENCLOSURE
2PAGE1OF1VIOLATION
50-244/87-10-04
DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT
ANDIMPLEMENTATION
AND IMPLEMENTATION
OFANEFFECTIVE
OF AN EFFECTIVE SHELF-LIFE
SHELF-LIFE
PROGRAM As identified
PROGRAMAsidentified
in Detail 6.6 of NRC Inspection
inDetail6.6ofNRCInspection
Report 50-22/90-09, the Procurement
Report50-22/90-09,
theProcurement
Engineering
Engineering
Grouphasbeenassignedthetaskofdevelopment/implementation
Group has been assigned the task of development/implementation
ofacomprehensive
of a comprehensive
shelf-life
shelf-life
programforitemsmaintained
program for items maintained
intheGinnaStationWarehou'se.
in the Ginna Station Warehou'se.
Development
Development
ofthecomputersoftwarewhichwillbeusedtoidentify,
of the computer software which will be used to identify, track and control items with limited shelf-life
trackandcontrolitemswithlimitedshelf-life
was begun June 15, 1990.Based on the progress thus far, completion
wasbegunJune15,1990.Basedontheprogressthusfar,completion
date for this phase is October 1, 1990.Development
dateforthisphaseisOctober1,1990.Development
of the implementing
oftheimplementing
procedures
procedures
fortheshelf-life
for the shelf-life
programwasbegunJuly23,1990,withanestimated
program was begun July 23, 1990, with an estimated completion
completion
date of October 1, 1990.The decision was made to develop the software first and the procedures
dateofOctober1,1990.Thedecisionwasmadetodevelopthesoftwarefirstandtheprocedures
would then be developed.
wouldthenbedeveloped.
Based on the implementation
Basedontheimplementation
dates identified
datesidentified
above, the overall shelf-life
above,theoverallshelf-life
program will be available for implementation
programwillbeavailable
by Procurement
forimplementation
byProcurement
Engineering
Engineering
onOctober1,1990.Atthat.time,allprocureditemswillstarttobeprocessed
on October 1, 1990.At that.time, all procured items will start to be processed through the shelf-life
throughtheshelf-life
program to assure that items with limited shelf-life
programtoassurethatitemswithlimitedshelf-life
are contained in the controlling
arecontained
inthecontrolling
program.Previously
program.Previously
procureditemswillcontinuetobehandledinaccordance
procured items will continue to be handled in accordance
withourinterimpolicyof"Last-In,
with our interim policy of"Last-In, First-Out" (LIFO).The Procurement
First-Out"
(LIFO).TheProcurement
Engineering
Engineering
Groupwillalsoperformareviewofpreviously
Group will also perform a review of previously
procureditemsmaintained
procured items maintained
inthewarehouse.
in the warehouse.
Thisprogramwillbeinitiated
This program will be initiated after the in-storage
afterthein-storage
preventive
preventive
maintenance
maintenance
programiscomplete,
program is complete, and is scheduled to begin around November 1, 1990.We expect this phase of the program to take a minimum of one year, at which time we will discontinue
andisscheduled
the interim LIFO policy.  
tobeginaroundNovember1,1990.Weexpectthisphaseoftheprogramtotakeaminimumofoneyear,atwhichtimewewilldiscontinue
ENCLOSURE 3 UNRESOLVED
theinterimLIFOpolicy.  
ITEM 50-244/88-23-01
ENCLOSURE
PAGE 1 OF 1 DEVELOPMENT
3UNRESOLVED
AND IMPLEMENTATION
ITEM50-244/88-23-01
OF A COMPREHENSIVE
PAGE1OF1DEVELOPMENT
ANDIMPLEMENTATION
OFACOMPREHENSIVE
PREVENTATIVE
PREVENTATIVE
MAINTENANCE
MAINTENANCE
PROGRAMAsidentified
PROGRAM As identified
inDetail6.7ofNRCInspection
in Detail 6.7 of NRC Inspection
Report50-244/90-
Report 50-244/90-
09,theProcurement
09, the Procurement
Engineering
Engineering
Grouphasbeenassignedthetaskofdevelopment/implementation
Group has been assigned the task of development/implementation
ofacomprehensive
of a comprehensive
preventive
preventive
maintenance
maintenance
programforitemsmaintained
program for items maintained
intheGinnaStationWarehouse.
in the Ginna Station Warehouse.
Development
Development
ofthecomputersoftwarewhichwillbeusedtoidentify,
of the computer software which will be used to identify, track and control items with preventive
trackandcontrolitemswithpreventive
maintenance
maintenance
requirements
requirements
wasbegunJune15,1990withapreviously
was begun June 15, 1990 with a previously
estimated
estimated completion
completion
date of September 1, 1990.However, the shelf-life
dateofSeptember
program is being developed in parallel with the preventative
1,1990.However,theshelf-life
programisbeingdeveloped
inparallelwiththepreventative
maintenance
maintenance
program.Therefore,
program.Therefore, the estimated date for software completion
theestimated
is now October 1, 1990.Development
dateforsoftwarecompletion
of the implementing
isnowOctober1,1990.Development
oftheimplementing
procedures
procedures
forthepreventative
for the preventative
maintenance
maintenance
programwasbegunJuly23,1990withanestimated
program was begun July 23, 1990 with an estimated completion
completion
date of September 1, 1990.However, since development
dateofSeptember
of the implementing
1,1990.However,sincedevelopment
oftheimplementing
procedures
procedures
isdependent
is dependent on completion
oncompletion
of the software, identified
ofthesoftware,
above, the estimated completion
identified
date has changed to October 1, 1990.This represents
above,theestimated
a one month deviation from the estimated completion
completion
date of September 1, 1990 which was identified
datehaschangedtoOctober1,1990.Thisrepresents
during the inspection.
aonemonthdeviation
Based on the implementation
fromtheestimated
dates, identified
completion
above, the overall preventive
dateofSeptember
1,1990whichwasidentified
duringtheinspection.
Basedontheimplementation
dates,identified
above,theoverallpreventive
maintenance
maintenance
programwillbeavailable
program will be available for implementation
forimplementation
by Procurement
byProcurement
Engineering
Engineering
onOctober1,1990.Atthattime,allprocureditemswillstarttobeprocessed
on October 1, 1990.At that time, all procured items will start to be processed through the preventative
throughthepreventative
maintenance
maintenance
programtoassurethatitemswithpreventative
program to assure that items with preventative
maintenance
maintenance
requirements
requirements
arecontained
are contained in the controlling
inthecontrolling
program.The Procurement
program.TheProcurement
Engineering
Engineering
Groupwillbeperforming
Group will be performing
areviewofpreviously
a review of previously
procureditemsmaintained
procured items maintained
inthewarehouse.
in the warehouse.
Thisprogramwillbeinitiated
This program will be initiated after implementation
afterimplementation
of the preventative
ofthepreventative
maintenance
maintenance
program,andisscheduled
program, and is scheduled to begin November 1, 1990.This phase is estimated to have a completion
tobeginNovember1,1990.Thisphaseisestimated
time of approximately
tohaveacompletion
one year.
timeofapproximately
oneyear.
}}
}}

Revision as of 14:25, 7 July 2018

Responds to Commitment Tracking Concerns Noted in Insp Rept 50-244/90-09 & Planned Corrective Actions.Util Confirms Commitments Dates for Implementation of Effective Shelf Life Program & Comprehensive Preventive Maint Program for Parts
ML17261B136
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/14/1990
From: MECREDY R C
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
To: MARTIN T T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
NUDOCS 9008230157
Download: ML17261B136 (12)


See also: IR 05000244/1990009

Text

ACCELERATED

DISTRIBUTION

DEMONSTRATION

SYSTEM REGULATORY

INFORMATION

DISTRIBUTION

SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9008230157

DOC.DATE: 90/08/14 NOTARIZED:

NO FACIL:50-244

Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION

MECREDY,R.C.

Rochester Gas 6 Electric iCorp.RECIP.NAME

RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

MARTIN,T.T.

Region 1 (Post 820201)SUBJECT: Responds to commitment

tracking concerns noted in Insp Rept 50-244/90-09.

DISTRIBUTION

CODE: IEOID COPIES RECEIVED LTR i ENCL J SIZE: TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice

of Violation Response DOCKET PT 05000244 NOTES:License

Exp date in accordance

with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72).

05000244 1'NTERNAL:

RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-3 PD AEOD AEOD/TPAD NRR MORISSEAUi

D NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10

NRR/DREP/PEPB9D

NRR/DST/DIR

8E2 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT

OGC/HDS2 RGN1 FILE 01 COPIES RECIPIENT LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME 1 1 JOHNSON,A 1 AEOD/DEIIB

1 DEDRO 1 NRR SHANKMAN,S

1 NRR/DOEA DIR 11 1 NRR/DRIS/DIR

1 NRR/PMAS/ILRB12

1 OE@3X 1 ECj FI 02 1 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXTERNAL: LPDR NSIC 1 1 NRC 1 1 PDR po$5f ggq lf/0/R D NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE!CONTA'CT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT.20079)TO ELIMINATE YOUR'NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION

LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 22 ENCL 22

c lee ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION

4 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER N.Y.14649 0001 ROBE'RT C.,r tFCREOY Vice t'rertdent

(,irma Nuctear Vrnerrrttrrn

'tEt.Etrrro

NE aREa COoE ate 546.2700 August 14, 1990 Mr.Thomas T.Martin Regional Administrator

U.S.Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

Region I 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, Pennsylvania

19406 SUBJECT: Inspection

Report 50-244/90-09

R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No.50-244 Dear Mr.Martin: This letter provides our response to the commitment

tracking concerns identified

in the subject inspection

report, and of our planned corrective

actions.(See Enclosure 1)We are also confirming

our commitments, including dates when our actions will be completed, for the implementation

of an effective shelf life program and a comprehensive

preventive

maintenance

program for spare parts.(See Enclosures

2 and 3)RG&E will be pleased to provide additional

information

to assist the NRC in your review of RG&E's compliance

and performance

in these matters.Very truly yours,~Cg~+Robert C.Mecredy Encs.xc: U.S.Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (Original)

Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 Ginna NRC Senior Resident Inspector t9."6~;.i K O;OOO244 r)O(57 90O814 PDR ADQC pDC 9

e

ENCLOSURE 1 COMMITMENT

TRACKING PAGE 1 OF 4 INTRODUCTION

Detail 6.9 of Inspection

Report 50-244/90-09

concluded that the commitment

tracking system at Ginna may not be fully effective because there are no apparent plans for addressing

certain items.Report Detail 7.1 identified

an apparent prolonged failure to meet a commitment (to maintain the excess letdown heat exchanger component cooling water return line containment

isolation valve as normally closed).The Inspection

Report cover letter requested that we evaluate the above matters, that we inform you of the assessment

of our ability to meet and adhere to similar safety commitments, and of any planned corrective

actions.Both Inspection

Report Details 6.9 and 7.1 address the implementation

and maintenance

of commitments.

However, the concerns identified

in Report Detail 6.9 apply to commitments

which typically require a one-time action to complete (e.g., NRC Violations, Unresolved

Items, Deviations).

Report Detail 7.1 applies to design commitments

which require continual cognizance

and implementation (e.g., operating AOV-745 as normally closed).Each of the above commitment

categories

require unique implementation

and maintenance

processes.

Accordingly, our corrective

actions will include separate methods for tracking each of the above categories

of commitments.

We believe that both of our methods will provide us with a higher.level of assurance that commitments

are being maintained

as well as providing a more efficient means of tracking commitment-

related information.

Both of our methods are discussed below.The section titled Commitment

and Action Trackin S stem outlines our approach to track the one-time action commitments

that are discussed in Report Detail 6.9.The second section titled Desicen Basis Documents outlines our approach to tracking design commitments

discussed in Report Detail 7.1.RG&E's Commitment

and Action Tracking System (CATS)which has been under development

since 1989, is not the tracking system which was reviewed and identified

in Report.Detail 6.9.RG&E has developed the plans, is developing

the mainframe software, and will provide the necessary organization

which will allow for the integration

of a number of current tracking systems, one of which was reviewed in Report Detail 6.9, into a single system for regulatory

and other types of commitments.

ENCLOSURE 1 (Continued)

COMMITMENT

AND ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM CATS PAGE 2 OF 4 RG&E has previously

recognized

the stated shortcomings

with our current commitment

tracking methods.To address this issue and concerns noted in Inspection

Reports 88-15 and 89-05, a Commitment

Tracking Assessment

was completed in January, 1989.Subsequent

to the assessment, the RG&E Commitment

and Action Tracking System (CATS)Project Plan was developed and approved by RG&E's Senior Management

in October, 1989.Development

of our upgraded tracking system is progressing.

As noted at.the March 6, 1990 NRC Region I-RG&E Management

Meeting, the anticipated

implementation

schedule for the tracking system is May 29, 1991 (Reference

RG&E Configuration

Management

Level I Schedule included in the meeting handouts which are attached to Inspection

Report 50-244/90-03, dated April 18, 1990).The following provides a brief description

of some of the features of the Commitment

and Action Tracking System (CATS): COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE

CATS will reside on our Data General mainframe computer.The use of the mainframe will allow access to up-to-date

commitment

data by both plant and corporate Nuclear Division personnel.

The upgraded tracking system will significantly

expand the types of data elements being tracked.Data elements include, but are not limited to: responsible

department

and individual;

document information

such as source of the commitment, related documents, and implementing/closure

documents;

due date and priority;RG&E and agency closure dates;status;agency;cause;plant systems/structures;

keywords;related commitments;

summary and detailed text of the commitment;

and comments.Each commitment

will also include an activities

section which will allow for development

of action plans where necessary.

The activities

section includes: activity number;department

and individual;

description

of activity;target completion

date and actual completion

date;and activity status.The software design includes menus to allow for various types of reports to be easily requested by Nuclear Division personnel.

User Manuals will be developed to aid personnel in the use of the system.The Detailed Software Design for the CATS is currently under development.

ENCLOSURE 1 (Continued)

PAGE, 3 OF 4 DATABASE Our established

goal is to provide an integrated

database of potentially

safety significant

issues which originate from various sources.At the time the system goes operational, the database wi'll, at a minimum, consist of those open commitments

which originated

in correspondence

to or from the NRC.In our current plans, we expect to expand the database to include other commitments/action

items from documents such as Corrective

Action Reports, Identified

Deficiency

Reports, Nonconformance

Reports, Management

Action Items, other federal, state, and local regulatory

agency correspondence, INPO Evaluations, and INPO generic industry correspondence (e.g., SOERs, SERs, etc.)The extent of the items to be addressed by CATS has not yet been finalized.

To allow for the building of a commitment

database concurrent

with the development

of the mainframe software, a PC based tracking system was developed in the Nuclear Safety and Licensing Group as an interim measure until the mainframe system implementation.

Reports generated from this interim system have the essential data elements and appearance

that reports generated from the mainframe will have, with the exception that the activities

section discussed in Section 1 above was excluded.Currently, the PC database includes commitments/action

items which originated

in correspondence

to and from the NRC dated subsequent

to January 1, 1990.The database also includes a number of commitments

which originated

prior to 1990 yet remained open.We are conducting

additional

reviews of our current tracking systems to identify pre-1990 commitments

which remain open.These reviews should assure that open NRC issues are identified

and included in the database at the time the mainframe system becomes operational.

It is our intent to retain closed commitments

in the database to facilitate

future historical

research of issues.The database that exists on the PC will be incorporated

into the mainframe computer system at the time of its implementation.

k

ENCLOSURE 1 (Continued)

PAGE 4 OF 4 3~MANAGEMENT

CONTROLS The Commitment

and Action Tracking System will provide assurance to management

that safety significant

issues are being addressed.

In addition to tracking the commitment/action

items, the system will allow action plans with appropriate

target completion

dates to be established.

Periodic reports to management

and line personnel showing issues overdue and coming due are planned.Administrative

controls and implementing

procedures

are scheduled to be developed prior to full system implementation.

These administrative

controls will establish responsibilities

for the maintenance

and implementation

of commitments.

Sufficient

progress has been made on our development

to allow us to start the distribution

of the significant

commitment

reports from the interim PC system.At this time, these reports are being used to supplement

information

from other systems and provide a higher level of confidence

that commitments

are being met.DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS As noted at the March 6, 1990 NRC Region I-RG&E Management

Meeting, the RG&E Configuration

Management

Level I Schedule shows a June 16, 1990 start date for the Design Basis Documents (DBDs)and a completion

date of November 21, 1994.The Design Basis Documents (DBDs)currently being developed for use by Engineering

and Ginna Station personnel will contain or reference the Design Basis and Licensing commitments

applicable

to the structures, systems and components

contained within them.The DBDs will be controlled

so that they will accurately

reflect the up-to-date

Design Basis and commitments.

They will provide the required reference documents for Engineering

and Ginna Station personnel to ensure that proposed modifications

are properly reviewed and that the Design Basis and ongoing commitments

are properly maintained

at Ginna Station.This will reduce the probability

of future occurrences

such as the improperly

positioned

valve described in Section 7.1 of the inspection

report.As previously

noted in NRC correspondence

and conversations, the DBD effort a recently initiated documentation

program.It will be performed in a systematic

fashion, with the most important systems and topics receiving higher priority.

f 1 0

ENCLOSURE 2 PAGE 1 OF 1 VIOLATION 50-244/87-10-04

DEVELOPMENT

AND IMPLEMENTATION

OF AN EFFECTIVE SHELF-LIFE

PROGRAM As identified

in Detail 6.6 of NRC Inspection

Report 50-22/90-09, the Procurement

Engineering

Group has been assigned the task of development/implementation

of a comprehensive

shelf-life

program for items maintained

in the Ginna Station Warehou'se.

Development

of the computer software which will be used to identify, track and control items with limited shelf-life

was begun June 15, 1990.Based on the progress thus far, completion

date for this phase is October 1, 1990.Development

of the implementing

procedures

for the shelf-life

program was begun July 23, 1990, with an estimated completion

date of October 1, 1990.The decision was made to develop the software first and the procedures

would then be developed.

Based on the implementation

dates identified

above, the overall shelf-life

program will be available for implementation

by Procurement

Engineering

on October 1, 1990.At that.time, all procured items will start to be processed through the shelf-life

program to assure that items with limited shelf-life

are contained in the controlling

program.Previously

procured items will continue to be handled in accordance

with our interim policy of"Last-In, First-Out" (LIFO).The Procurement

Engineering

Group will also perform a review of previously

procured items maintained

in the warehouse.

This program will be initiated after the in-storage

preventive

maintenance

program is complete, and is scheduled to begin around November 1, 1990.We expect this phase of the program to take a minimum of one year, at which time we will discontinue

the interim LIFO policy.

ENCLOSURE 3 UNRESOLVED

ITEM 50-244/88-23-01

PAGE 1 OF 1 DEVELOPMENT

AND IMPLEMENTATION

OF A COMPREHENSIVE

PREVENTATIVE

MAINTENANCE

PROGRAM As identified

in Detail 6.7 of NRC Inspection

Report 50-244/90-

09, the Procurement

Engineering

Group has been assigned the task of development/implementation

of a comprehensive

preventive

maintenance

program for items maintained

in the Ginna Station Warehouse.

Development

of the computer software which will be used to identify, track and control items with preventive

maintenance

requirements

was begun June 15, 1990 with a previously

estimated completion

date of September 1, 1990.However, the shelf-life

program is being developed in parallel with the preventative

maintenance

program.Therefore, the estimated date for software completion

is now October 1, 1990.Development

of the implementing

procedures

for the preventative

maintenance

program was begun July 23, 1990 with an estimated completion

date of September 1, 1990.However, since development

of the implementing

procedures

is dependent on completion

of the software, identified

above, the estimated completion

date has changed to October 1, 1990.This represents

a one month deviation from the estimated completion

date of September 1, 1990 which was identified

during the inspection.

Based on the implementation

dates, identified

above, the overall preventive

maintenance

program will be available for implementation

by Procurement

Engineering

on October 1, 1990.At that time, all procured items will start to be processed through the preventative

maintenance

program to assure that items with preventative

maintenance

requirements

are contained in the controlling

program.The Procurement

Engineering

Group will be performing

a review of previously

procured items maintained

in the warehouse.

This program will be initiated after implementation

of the preventative

maintenance

program, and is scheduled to begin November 1, 1990.This phase is estimated to have a completion

time of approximately

one year.