ML20154G148: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 28: Line 28:
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Docket No. 50-219 t
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Docket No. 50-219 t
GPU Nuclear. Inc. Submittal 1940-98-20488 Docketing of Omitted Pages                              ,
GPU Nuclear. Inc. Submittal 1940-98-20488 Docketing of Omitted Pages                              ,
By letter dated September 14,1998, GPU Nuclear, Inc. submitted the replies to Requests for Additional Information made by the NRC staff. That letter, in Attachment 5, docketed two GPUN calculations. Calculation C-1302-241-E610-080, Rev.2, inadvertently omitted pages                                      !
By {{letter dated|date=September 14, 1998|text=letter dated September 14,1998}}, GPU Nuclear, Inc. submitted the replies to Requests for Additional Information made by the NRC staff. That letter, in Attachment 5, docketed two GPUN calculations. Calculation C-1302-241-E610-080, Rev.2, inadvertently omitted pages                                      !
52 and 216. These two pages are included as Attachment 1 to this cover. Calculation C-1302-241-E610-074, Rev. I', did not contain page 85. It has been determined that this calculation was incorrectly paginated. There is no page 85, and the previous submittal is complete.
52 and 216. These two pages are included as Attachment 1 to this cover. Calculation C-1302-241-E610-074, Rev. I', did not contain page 85. It has been determined that this calculation was incorrectly paginated. There is no page 85, and the previous submittal is complete.
If any additional information or assistance is required, please contact Mr. John Rogers of my staff at 609.971.4893.
If any additional information or assistance is required, please contact Mr. John Rogers of my staff at 609.971.4893.

Latest revision as of 07:21, 10 December 2021

Forwards Pages 52 & 216 for Rev 2 to Calculation C-1302- 241-E610-080,that Were Inadvertently Omitted from Licensee 980914 Submittal.Util Determined That Rev 1 to Calculation C-1302-241-E610-074 Was Incorrectly Paginated
ML20154G148
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 10/05/1998
From: Roche M
GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
1940-98-20568, NUDOCS 9810130066
Download: ML20154G148 (4)


Text

._ _- - __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ . . . _

j* * .

l 1

l GPU Nuclear,Inc.

( U.S. Route #9 South i NUCLEAR Post Office Box 388 Forked Rever, NJ 08731-0388 Tel 609-971-4000 October 5,1998 1940-98-20568 l l

' U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington DC 20555 .

Dear Sir:

Subject:

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Docket No. 50-219 t

GPU Nuclear. Inc. Submittal 1940-98-20488 Docketing of Omitted Pages ,

By letter dated September 14,1998, GPU Nuclear, Inc. submitted the replies to Requests for Additional Information made by the NRC staff. That letter, in Attachment 5, docketed two GPUN calculations. Calculation C-1302-241-E610-080, Rev.2, inadvertently omitted pages  !

52 and 216. These two pages are included as Attachment 1 to this cover. Calculation C-1302-241-E610-074, Rev. I', did not contain page 85. It has been determined that this calculation was incorrectly paginated. There is no page 85, and the previous submittal is complete.

If any additional information or assistance is required, please contact Mr. John Rogers of my staff at 609.971.4893.

Very truly yours, ,

b Michael B. Roc %e .

Vice President and Director Oyster Creek MBR/JJR ,

cc: Administrator, Region I /' /

3 NRC Project Manager Senior Resident Inspector I

9810130066 981005 i PDR ADOCK 05000219 t P PDR j vur eve

1 Attachment I .

1940-98-20568

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f

~ ~ ~ ~

i .10-01-98 15:38:43

- Gipu suct.un Calculation Sheet Subject Calc. No.

Rev. No. Sheet ho.

Calculation of Torus Pool Temperature as NPSH Input C-1302-241-E610-080 2 52 of

, Originator Da'e 2IF Revwwed by Date P.N. Hansen 8/l8/98

,l

Case 1 ,

Time (sec) Pool Temp (F) DW Pressure (psia) Wetydell Pool Level (in) l 636.00l 138.00 19.66l 142.90 )

j l 646.10) 138.10l 19.021 143.10l I

l 656.10l 138.20l 18.69l 143.00l l l 666.10l 138.40l 18.31l 143.20l l l 676.20l 138.60l 18.05l 143.20]

j l 686.30l 138.80l 18.001 143.80l 2

l 696.40l 138.90l 17.83l 143.70l l l 720.10l 139.00 17.29l 143.10]

139.20 l 740.30l 16.67! 143.00l l l 760.40l 139.40 16.46l 143.101 l l 780.60l 139.70 16.34l 143.30l l'

l 800.70l 139.80 16.331 143.20]

l 820.90l 139.90 16.00 143.10l

^

l 841.10l 140.20 16.15 143.20l l 861.30l 140.30 16.25 143.20l

l 881.50l 140.60 16.18 143.40l j l 901.60l 140.60 16.13 143.10l l l 921.70l 140.80 15.98 143.10l j l 941.70l 140.90 16.08 143.101 i l 961.90l 141.00 16.20 143.20l

) l 982.00l 141.10 16.08 143.30]

j l 1002.00l 141.20 15.98 143.10l i l 1022.00l 141.30 15.99 143.10l l l 1042.00l 141.40 16.04 143.20l l l 1062.001 141.50 15.71 143.10]

l l 1082.00l 141.60 16.10 143.20]

l 1102.00l 141.50 16.25 143.00l

! l 1122.00l 141.50 16.40 143.00l l l 1142.00l 141.50 16.55 143.00l l l 1162.00l 141.50 10.72 143.00l

} l 1183.00l ~

141.50 16.88 143.00]

2 l 1203.00l 141.50 17.03 143.00]

l l 1223.00l ~ ~ ~ 141.60 17.16 143.00]

l 1243.00l 141.60 17.27 143.00l 1

l 1263.00) 141.60 17.37 143.00)

!' u:\msoffice\winword\npshcall . doc

)

i

(

~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~

i 5 059815:51:Ii5 3

1 Sheet $of 2l~7 I h N C-1302-241-EG10480 l NUCLEAR

  • VERIFICATION PLAN /

SUMMARY

SHEET i

(EP 006).

lleemNo. MethoWDepth of Vwinca6cn Required Req'd Cornpl. Debo l

{ 1 Verification of calculation references for applicability. 85/98 l l 2 Verificebon of calculation methodology. 8/6/98 .

) 3 Verificebon of assumptions. 8/6/98 l

{ 4 Verification of calculation inputs that were revised for Rev. 2 of cakulation. 8/6/98 l 5 Verification of calculation results. 8/6/98 i 1

Assioned verinceeon Engineer Thomas S. Corcoran ouesised pw 4.4.1.3.b x Yes

. O waived Jesuscemon forwaivw N/A Sa8 ion Manapw(SM)(eion) -

/. C [w.j oote 7[/f[, ,

Summary of verificabon scope, methods, results and conclusions.

Calculation conforms to and satisfies all the requirements of EP-006. The references that were used for input into the calculation (Reference 10 for Rev. 2 of calculation) were correct and appropriale. All assumptions stated and used were oppropriate and correctly reflect plant condition and operabon The use of GOTHIC Version 6.0 for cases 7 through 9 was -

appropriate and correct. The Ir. puts to the respectrve computer decks as rtquired by Revision 2 of the calculation were correct. All calculation results are consistent and have been found to be correct and reasonable.

A s .

Based on this evaluation, the calculation is verified to be veteasson Engineer (print) ble. //

Thornas Sean Corcoran n) ---

'r- 8/8/98 v

e i

__