ML20196J820: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
| project =  
| project = TAC:MA3603, TAC:MA3604
| stage = Approval
| stage = Approval
}}
}}
Line 28: Line 28:
==Dear Mr. Peterson:==
==Dear Mr. Peterson:==


By letter dated September 14,1998, Duke Energy Corporation (DEC) submitted a relief request for Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, concening four relief valves in the diesel generator fuel oil system.
By {{letter dated|date=September 14, 1998|text=letter dated September 14,1998}}, Duke Energy Corporation (DEC) submitted a relief request for Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, concening four relief valves in the diesel generator fuel oil system.
The staff has reviewed and evaluated the submitted information. Details of the staff's review are delineated in the enclosed Safety Evaluation. The staff determined that the requirements of          :
The staff has reviewed and evaluated the submitted information. Details of the staff's review are delineated in the enclosed Safety Evaluation. The staff determined that the requirements of          :
OM-1 Paragraphs 7.3.2.2 and 8.1.3.8 on the subject valves are impractical. Imposition of Code requirernents would compel DEC to redesign the diesel generator fuel oil system and this would result in an undue burden. The staff, therefore, grants the requested relief and imposes the alternative requirement pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Reaulations. Section 50.55a(f)(6)(i). The relief and alternative testing are authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security and are otherwise in the public interest giving due consideration to the burden on DEC if the requirements were imposed on the facility.
OM-1 Paragraphs 7.3.2.2 and 8.1.3.8 on the subject valves are impractical. Imposition of Code requirernents would compel DEC to redesign the diesel generator fuel oil system and this would result in an undue burden. The staff, therefore, grants the requested relief and imposes the alternative requirement pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Reaulations. Section 50.55a(f)(6)(i). The relief and alternative testing are authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security and are otherwise in the public interest giving due consideration to the burden on DEC if the requirements were imposed on the facility.
Line 49: Line 49:


==Dear Mr. Peterson:==
==Dear Mr. Peterson:==
i By letter dated September 14,1998, Duke Energy Corporation (DEC) submitted a relief request for Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, concerning four relief valves in the diesel generator fuel oil system.
i By {{letter dated|date=September 14, 1998|text=letter dated September 14,1998}}, Duke Energy Corporation (DEC) submitted a relief request for Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, concerning four relief valves in the diesel generator fuel oil system.
The staff has reviewed and evaluated the submitted information. Details of the staff's review are delineated in the enclosed Safety Evaluation. The staff determined that the requirements of OM-1 Paragraphs 7.3.2.2 and 8.1.3.8 on the subject valves are impractical. Imposition of Code requirements would compel DEC to redesign the diesel generator fuel oil system and this would result in an undue burden. The staff, therefore, grants the requested relief and imposes the alternative requirement pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Reaulations, Section 50.55a(f)(6)(i). The relief and alternative testing are authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security and are otherwise in the public interest giving cue consideration to the burden on DEC if the requirements ; vere imposed on the facility.
The staff has reviewed and evaluated the submitted information. Details of the staff's review are delineated in the enclosed Safety Evaluation. The staff determined that the requirements of OM-1 Paragraphs 7.3.2.2 and 8.1.3.8 on the subject valves are impractical. Imposition of Code requirements would compel DEC to redesign the diesel generator fuel oil system and this would result in an undue burden. The staff, therefore, grants the requested relief and imposes the alternative requirement pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Reaulations, Section 50.55a(f)(6)(i). The relief and alternative testing are authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security and are otherwise in the public interest giving cue consideration to the burden on DEC if the requirements ; vere imposed on the facility.
Sincerely, l                (
Sincerely, l                (

Latest revision as of 03:12, 9 December 2021

Forwards SE Granting Licensee 980914 Relief Request Re Four Relief Valves in Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Sys,Per 10CFR50.55a(f)(6)(i)
ML20196J820
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/08/1998
From: Berkow H
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Gordon Peterson
DUKE POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20196J824 List:
References
TAC-MA3603, TAC-MA3604, NUDOCS 9812110037
Download: ML20196J820 (4)
v • d • e


Text

. _ . .

,_ . Mr. G ry R. P:t rson December 8, 1998 Sits Vic) Prs:ident Cettwb2 Nucl: r St: tion Duke Energy Corporation

4800 Concord Road York, South Carolina 29745-9635

SUBJECT:

CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION - RELIEF FROM CERTAIN TESTING REQUIREMENTS FOR DIESEL FUEL SYSTEM RELIEF VALVES (TAC NOS. MA3603 AND MA3604)

Dear Mr. Peterson:

By letter dated September 14,1998, Duke Energy Corporation (DEC) submitted a relief request for Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, concening four relief valves in the diesel generator fuel oil system.

The staff has reviewed and evaluated the submitted information. Details of the staff's review are delineated in the enclosed Safety Evaluation. The staff determined that the requirements of  :

OM-1 Paragraphs 7.3.2.2 and 8.1.3.8 on the subject valves are impractical. Imposition of Code requirernents would compel DEC to redesign the diesel generator fuel oil system and this would result in an undue burden. The staff, therefore, grants the requested relief and imposes the alternative requirement pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Reaulations. Section 50.55a(f)(6)(i). The relief and alternative testing are authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security and are otherwise in the public interest giving due consideration to the burden on DEC if the requirements were imposed on the facility.

Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:

Herbert N. Berkow, Director )

Project Directorate 11-2 Division of Reactor Projects - 1/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414

Enclosure:

Safety Evaluation cc w/ encl: See next page DISTRIBUTION MTschiltz, EDO MKotzalas OGC I Docket File PUBLIC ACRS PD ll-2 Rdg.

LPlisco, Ril COgle, Ril Qh3! '

l GHill(4) BBoger e-mail TLH3 SE only DOCUMENT NAME: G:\ CATAWBA \C3603RR.WPD Ta receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment / enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment / enclosure "N" = No copy *See previous concurrence 1

OFFICE PM:PDil-2* LA:PDil-2 l OGC l D:P,dili$M [

NAME PTAM:cn LBERRY* MYOUNG* H6ERltQfV DATE 12/8/98 11 /19 /98 11 /30 /98 /i/ 7 /98 / /97 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 9812110037 981208 PGR ADOCK 05000413 P PDR mig ERE CEMER SGPY

      • o y UNITED STATES g j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o, WASHINGTON, D.C. 30806-0001 f

'% / December 8,1998 Mr. Gary R. Peterson Site Vice President Catawba Nuclear Station Duke Energy Corporation 4800 Concord Road York, South Carolina 29745-9635

SUBJECT:

CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION - RELIEF FROM CERTAIN TESTING REQUIREMENTS FOR DIESEL FUEL SYSTEM RELIEF VALVES (TAC NOS. MA3603 AND MA3604) -

Dear Mr. Peterson:

i By letter dated September 14,1998, Duke Energy Corporation (DEC) submitted a relief request for Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, concerning four relief valves in the diesel generator fuel oil system.

The staff has reviewed and evaluated the submitted information. Details of the staff's review are delineated in the enclosed Safety Evaluation. The staff determined that the requirements of OM-1 Paragraphs 7.3.2.2 and 8.1.3.8 on the subject valves are impractical. Imposition of Code requirements would compel DEC to redesign the diesel generator fuel oil system and this would result in an undue burden. The staff, therefore, grants the requested relief and imposes the alternative requirement pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Reaulations, Section 50.55a(f)(6)(i). The relief and alternative testing are authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security and are otherwise in the public interest giving cue consideration to the burden on DEC if the requirements ; vere imposed on the facility.

Sincerely, l (

>/c rbert N. Berkow, Director roject Directorate 11-2 Division of Reactor Projects -l/il Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414

Enclosure:

Safety Evaluation cc w/ encl: See next pag *

. - , . -. . - - . - - - ._.- . - ~ . . - - . - - . - . .- - - - . - . . -

Catawba Nuclear Station i i 1

j . cc: I e ,

Mr. Gary Gilbert North Caroli.'a Electric Membership l Regulatory Compliance Manager Corporation  ;

, Duke Energy Corporation P. O. Box 27306 4800 Concord Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 '

York, South Carolina 29745 -

Senior Resident inspector Mr. Paul R. Newton U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Legal Department (PB05E) 4830 Concord Road Duke Energy Corporation York, South Carolina 29745 422 South Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1006 l

, Regional Administrator, Region ll j U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  ;

i J. Michael McGarry, Ill, Esquire Atlanta Federal Center '

Winston and Strawn 61 Forsyth Street, S.W., Suite 23T85 1400 L Street, NW Atlanta, Georgia 30303 i Washington, DC 20005 Virgil R. Autry, Director North Carolina Municipal Power Division of Radioactive Waste Management l

i. Agency Number 1 Bureau of Land and Waste Management 1427 Meadowwood Boulevard . Department of Health and Environmental P. O. Box 29513 ' Control I

Raleigh, North Carolina 27626 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201-1708 i 4

County Manager of York County i York County Courthouse L. A. Keller  ;

York, South Carolina 29745 Manager- Nuclear Regulatory Licensing Piedmont Municipal Power Agency Duke Energy Corporation  !

! 121 Village Drive 526 South Church Street  ;

. Greer, South Carolina 29651 Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1006 Ms. Karen E. Long Saluda River Electric 2

Assistant Attorney General P. O. Box 929

! - North Carolina Department of Justice Laurens, South Carolina 29360 P. O. Box 629 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Mr. Steven P. Shaver Senior Sales Engineer

! Elaine Wathen, Lead REP Planner Westinghouse Electric Company Division of Emergency Management 5929 Carnegie Blvd. I 116 West Jones Street Suite 500 Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-1335 Chariotte, North Carolina 28209 t

I i

l Catawba Nuclear Station '

cc: ,

Mr. T. Richard Puryear '

Owners Group (NCEMC) ,

Duke Enc;gy Corporation .

4800 Concord Road York, South Carolina 29745 i Richard M. Fry, Director Division of Radiation Protection North Carolina Departrnent of '

Environment, Health, and l Natural Resources l 3825 Barrett Drive

[

Raleigh, North Carolina 27609-7721 i

l i

I l

\

s l

=

U i

(

1 i l l

\

_ _ .

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20196J820&oldid=3343027"