ML20211H655

Submits Daily Highlight.On 860616,intervenors Mothers for Peace & Sierra Club Filed Application for Stay W/Commission & ASLB Re License Amends Authorizing Expansion of Spent Fuel Pool

ML20211H655
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	06/19/1986
From:	Schierling H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Harold Denton, Lyons J, Vollmer R NRC
Shared Package
ML20197G068	List: IA-86-744, Submits Daily Highlight.On 860930,util Commenced Unloading Spent Fuel from Unit 1 Into Original Racks,Reinstalled Into Unit 1 Pool.On 861001,fuel Assembly Element in Reactor Vessel Tipped Into Unloaded Assemblies.No Fuel Damage ML20197G063 ML20197G272 ML20197G348 ML20197G378 ML20197G383 ML20197G406 ML20197G411 ML20197H807 ML20197J383 ML20197J432 ML20198G046 ML20210U819 ML20211H655 ML20211N838 ML20214N656 ML20215D091 ML20215N496
References
FOIA-86-744 NUDOCS 8606250495
Download: ML20211H655 (1)

Text

.. - - - _. - - . . -

June 19, 1986 Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323 MEMORANDUM FOR: H. Denton* R. W. Houston F. Rosa R. Vollmer* D. Crutchfield V. Benaroya J. Lyons* E. Rossi E. J. Weinkam H. Thompson

• G. Lainas L. Rubenstein*

F. Miraglia* T. Speis G. Lear R. Bernero* W.-Russell B. J. Youngblood G. Holahan* J. Milhoan S. Varga T. Novak R. Ballard V. Noonan THRU: Steven A. Varga, Director PWR Project Directorate #3 Division of PWR Licensing-A FROM: Hans E. Schierling, Senior Project Manager PWR Project Directorate #3 Division of PWR Licensing-A

SUBJECT:

DAILY HIGHLIGHT Plant Name Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 - Spent Fuel Pool Expansion On June 16, 1986 Mothers for Peace and Sierra Club (Intervenors) filed an Application for Stay with the Comission and the Licensing Board regarding license amendments for Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 authorizing expansion of the spent fuel pool for each unit from 270 to 1329 fuel assembly storage locations. The Environmental Assessment and Amendments, including the staff safety evaluation and final no significant hazards consideration,~ were issued on Ma 30, 1986 respectively. The application for Stay is based on (1)yassertions 21 and Maythat the NRC did not comply with applicable parts of the Atomic Energy Act and NEPA requirements and (2) an affidavit by Dr.

Ferguson asserting that the structural analysis did not include appropriate considerations such as the deletion of anchoring the racks to the floor and postulated combined motion of racks.

Hans E. Schierling, Senior Project Manager PWR Project Directorate #3 Division of PWR Licensing-A DISTRIBUTION l Docket File '

PDf3 Rdg.

50495 860619 $, 9a ADOCK 050 su PADf3:

HSchierTttg/bs 06/ /86 q 1&

. . - __ _- . . _ . - _