ML20005B529: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 51: Line 51:
The Office of Oceanography would appreciate notification of any change in construction plans that would adversely impact gage operation or bench mark emplacement.
The Office of Oceanography would appreciate notification of any change in construction plans that would adversely impact gage operation or bench mark emplacement.
f          s 10TH ANNIVERSARY 1970-1980
f          s 10TH ANNIVERSARY 1970-1980
                                                        ;
{                    National Oceanic and Atmospheric A0ninistration
{                    National Oceanic and Atmospheric A0ninistration
[    A young agency with a historic tradition of rervice to the Nation
[    A young agency with a historic tradition of rervice to the Nation

Latest revision as of 17:23, 17 February 2020

Forwards NOAA Comments Re Des for Facility.Const to Date Has Not Disturbed Water Level Gauge or Bench Mark Emplacement
ML20005B529
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/01/1981
From: Miki R
COMMERCE, DEPT. OF, NATIONAL OCEANIC & ATMOSPHERIC
To: Youngblood B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8107080336
Download: ML20005B529 (3)


Text

_ _ _

.n e, e

~

2 <

1 GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE UNITE] GTATE] EEPARTMENT CF C MMEICE

\%%,, e p/ Washington, D C. 20230 7ci A JUL i 1981 , c.s

.,~'

p"[ u

)

Mr. B. J. Youngblood JUL 0 7198! > g i Chief, Licensing Branch No. 1 g' u %ua Division of Licensing \*

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission \'k y}&

Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Mr. Youngblood:

This is in reference to your draft environmental impact statement entitled "Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit No. 2." The enclosed comments fram the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) are forwarded for your consideration.

Thank you for giving us an opportunity to provide these comments, which l we hope will be of assistance to you. We would appreciate receiving four copies of the final statement.

Sincerely, Lu;diau Robert T. . tih Director of Regulatory Policy Enclosure Memos from: Mr. Eugene J. Aubert Environmer.t.Tl Research Laboratories NOAA Mr. Robert B. Rollins i

National Ocean Survey i NOAA l

l i

5' i i (

7' l

$ PDR e107000336 010701 ADOCK 05000341PDR l QD l

I

[je \f o,eg'#g .UPdlTED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Idational Oceanic and Atmo:.pheric idministration

. QQ '. NATIONAL OCEAN SURVEY K* ,,,,, , /' Rockville. Md. 2b852 MY 2 91931 0A/C52x6:JVZ T0: PP/EC - Joyce M. Wood [

FROM:

0A/C5 - Robert B. Rollins/[

SUBJECT:

DEIS #8105.13 - Operation of Enrico Femi Atomic Power Plant, Unit No. 2 (Docket No. 50-341), Monroe County, Michigan The subject statement has been reviewed within the areas of the National Ocean Survey's (NOS) responsibility and expertise, and in tems of the impact of the proposed action on NOS activities and projects.

The National Ocean Survey operates a water level gage on the Femi Power Plant site. Construction to date has not disturbed the gage or suite of bench marks. Future construction, as outlined in the Draft Environmental Statement would not affect the installation.

The Office of Oceanography would appreciate notification of any change in construction plans that would adversely impact gage operation or bench mark emplacement.

f s 10TH ANNIVERSARY 1970-1980

{ National Oceanic and Atmospheric A0ninistration

[ A young agency with a historic tradition of rervice to the Nation

e. s
  • ~

[ -

DJJ. DEPERTMENT CF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

\.,'*" ** / ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORlES Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory 2300 Washtenaw Avenue Ann Arbor, MI 48104 June 9, 1981 TO: PP/EC - Joyce FROM:

g 3/ //,/

RD/RF24 - Eugene' ./Aubert

SUBJECT:

DEIS 8105.13 - Operation of Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit No. 2 (Docket No. 50-341), Monroe County, Michigan The subject DEIS prepared by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on the operation of Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant on Lake Erie has been reviewed and comments herewith submitted.

Our review of the operation of Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit No. 2, was limited to the effects on Lake Erie. We found them to be minimal. There are no objections against the issuance of an operating license.

~

10TH ANNihERSARY- 1970-1980 0

j National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

{ '

  • A young agency'h ht , ),

%.o tradition of service to the at..ua /,/ j

= - all L .

-- _ a