ML12355A782: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML12355A782
| number = ML12355A782
| issue date = 11/26/2012
| issue date = 11/26/2012
| title = Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page 141 of 561 - Page 18
| title = SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page 141 of 561 - Page 183 of 561
| author name = Miktus P A
| author name = Miktus P
| author affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| author affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = Report, Miscellaneous
| document type = Report, Miscellaneous
| page count = 43
| page count = 43
| project =
| stage = Other
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                            NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 rA    qj Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YN NE] Ui0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment(D No: QIHIINGR2504t,                      Equip; Class' pkg F141 EquipmentDescription RADIATION MONITOR PANEL Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor EL. 155                        Room, Area ___
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item Of equipiment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used toxrecord the results ofjudgments and findintgs. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting 6ther conanetits.
Anchorag I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one  YE] No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2.. Is the, anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?          YE NE] UE] N/AN
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface            YYO NE] UE] N/AR]
oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage:free of visible:cracks in the concrete near the anchors?      YE] NEI UE] N/A0
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?            YO NE] UE    NIA0 (Note: Tthis question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuratidn verification is required.)
Reference U733260 V2
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of            YZ NE] UM potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Enier-flie equipnlentcdas ihale frohi AppcndixB:; Classes 6f Eqbipinent.
Page 141 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                          NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0
              ~171\                                                                                Sheet 2 status: YG] Nn UD of 6 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QHIH1NGR25041,                Equip. Class- 20 Pka Fl-41 Equipment Description. RADIATION MONITOR PANEL Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets freefro'm impact by nearby equipment orstructures?        YMJ NEI    UE] NiAE
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO' NEI UE] N/AE3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No overhead items.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?              YO NE1 UE1 N/A-Visible Conduits adequately flexible.
Also cabinetis very rigid.
1:0. Based oh the. above seismic interaction evaluationsi, is equipment free    Yg NE1 UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Haye you looked for and found no other, seismic conditions thatcould        YZ Ni"UE]
adversely affect .the safety finctions of the equipment?
Corn ments Addi'tional pages may be added as necessary)
Cabinet adjacent(N-42).per D-175069 is< 3/4 "away, but adequately stiff to pose no,adverse seismic I/A concern, This package was originally signed on 8-214-2 but retyped for clarify on 10-15-12.
Evaluated by:      ,Ste*en Yun by,,,Telecon      /vIi  a                          Date:    V-21/12 Paul Miktus          /  J!                                              8k21/2 Page 142 of 561
ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONP Page 143 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                          0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0
                                                                                        <4 Page 144 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS            NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 II 1FI-,cY)
I              76 Page 145 of 561
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONV
                                                                        ,Tl Page 146 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                          NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheeti of 14 StatuS: YN NRl ULI Seismic.Walkdown Checklist (SWC),
Equipment.ID No. QIHIINGSSP2506G Equip. Class ,206 Equipmeont Descrpntion SOLID STATE.,PROTECTION INPUT CABINET Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY FoorEl. 155,                        Room, Area 416 Mantufacturer., Modei, Etc. (optio6bal.btitiec6mmcnd&Id)
Instructions for. Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document:the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item. of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of tile, fklowing.questions maybe used to record the results of judgments and:
findings. Additional space, i&sect; pr6ovided itt the end.of.this&sect; cheekist for documenting otlier cofoments, Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one :YZ NO of the 50% of SWEL item s requiringsuh verficaion)?
2.. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?            Y.    ,NO UEIC N/A*E
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that -is more than mild surface            YN NENiUF] N/AF-oxidation?
4-. Isthe anchorage free of visible-cracks in the concrete near the anchors?      Y    NE]. Un N/AMI
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?            YO NE] UE] N/AE-(Note: This questiobnonly Aippjies if the item is one of-tle.,50% for which an anchorage configurationverification is required.).
Refer-ence SEWS'for'QIHI ING.SSP2506J dated 5/25/94 and 2506G:
5/25/94., Verified ahchorage.bqy.-puIlingup carpet from front and back of QIHI1NSSP2506G, IH&4I.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchoragefree of            Y[9 NE] UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
DOEterthquj~imicnt class niame 660m Aflpendix.,B: Classes ofEquipnient.
Page 147 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                          NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2of 14 Status- YO NEI Un Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIHi INGSSP25O6G Equip. Class' 20
                            , Pkg FI-42 Eq-auipment Descrip ion SOLID STATE PROTECTION INPUT CABINET Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or-structures?      YZJ NEI iEI    1NIA
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distffibutiofi systems, deiling tiles and lightinf, Y* NE Ui        N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the.equipment?
: 9. DO attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage                YZ NE UO N/AO
: 10. Based on the above. seismic inteaction.eyiluations, is equipmenit free      YZ NO UE of potentially adverse'.seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions 1j. Have you.looked for and found no other seismic conditions thatcould          YGl NEI UE adversely affect the safety fimetions of the equipment?,
No Comments Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Cabinetadjacent(N-42) per D-175069 is < 3/4" away, but adequately stiff to pose: no adverse seismic I/A concern.
This package was originally signed on 8-21-12 but retyped for clarity on 10-15-12.
Evaliaked .hv-                                                                      Date-  8121112 PaukMiktus                                                              &21,112 2
Page 148 of 561
9 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION A-i        r4A Page 149 of 561
9                                                                                      is ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 150 of 561
m z
cn) m
    -I C/)
CD 0
01I a?
z 0
Ci) z 7) 0 m
C/)
0 z.
*ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIO*
Page 152 of 561
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .10 4'
Page 153 of 561
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONRO Page 154 of 561
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 155 of 561
*ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .0 Page 156 of 561
9IACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .V Page 157 of 561
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONO Page 158 of 561
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0          NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.00 Page 159 of 561
9 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS                                            0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 160 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                              NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sh$1ee-t 1 f statu'&sect;: YLJ NO      ~
Seismic Walkdo          Checklist (SWC)
Equipmen lIDNo. Q1H21EO05-3.                  Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description 4, 16KV SWITCHGEAR&1G LOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bdg. AUXILIARY FloorEl. 12.1                    Rkbm, Area    -
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. '(optional bit.recommiended)
InstructionsI for Completing Checklist.
This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an iem of equipment on the SWEL. The*spa. below each of the following questionsitmay be used to record ibe tesults of judgmrents and findings. Additional spaceis provided atthe end of this checklist fordocumenting other domments.,
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required'(i.e., is theitem one  Y96 ND of0ile kd%of SWEL items requii'ring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?,          'Y    ND        N/AO
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more~than mildsurface            YO ND Ug"N/AD oxidation?
4, hs the anchorage free of visible cracks in the.concrete near the anchors?    Y    ND UFD N/AD S. Is h*tanchorage~configuration consistent with plant documentation?            YD NDI          N/AD (Note: Thifs question-only applies if the item is one of the 53% for which an anchorage configuration verification*. is required.)
                        +
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of            YD ND potentially adverse seisrmic conditioins?
                                            *c41L o~4                ua  .            4 -~
Enter th~eeq~r~tcsname tFrom      AppondixB: Ct      are fEquipm~ent.
Page 161 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                            NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet a2ofyq Status: YO NEI] U[0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist.(SWC)
Equipment.1 No- QIH21EO05                      Equip. Glass* 20..
Equipment Descri pioni .o416KV SWITCHGEAR IG LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects
: 7. Arc soft targets free-from impact by nearby, equipment:or structres?      Y~fNO. UO:JN/AQ
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribdition systems, ceiling files and lighting, YILJ NOl UO.N/AO iand iasoniy 'block Wa tsl not likely to collapse onto. the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.                  I ONEI Ti      N/AC,
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free          Y6NO U0J ofpotentially adverse, seismic. interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and fdund no other seismic conditions that :culd        y5( NEI UC adversely affec6tithe safety functions of the equiomeni?
Comments (Additioaal pages hay:oe added as necessary)
: .  .    .. .,... [ . ..                  '
E-valuated by:          ~        ~      '                  iQ&u-                  D~ate: ___________
                        \,J Page 162 of 561
ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .10 Page 163 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS            NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0
                . P, .
Page 164 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                          NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 f--k-A                                                                          Sheet 1 of-i-Status: YE-- NE-- UJ*'
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. Q1H21E505                        Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR IJ LOCAL CONTROL PANEL Location: Bldg. DIESEL              Floor El. 155'          Room, Area 0056C Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YX'N" of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
RQ~e,-c..Wc              CNCX.C&#xfd;    17- (icm
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?            YO- N-  UP(N/A--
                    ~ c.3eA- vjk        &#xfd; 'e        ~                0A  ~~.k'~.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface            YO NO UpJ[ N/AI oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?    YO NBI UO N/Ar"
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?          YO NB UOEf'N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          YO NBi  UF potentially adverse seismic conditions?
    'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 165 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                          NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 Of  7 Status: Yfl] NF- UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)                                                            S Equipment ID No. 01H21E505                    Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 1J LOCAL CONTROL PANEL.
Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?              YJ%/NEJ UD] N/AD]
C___&,.4 ".- -          &#xfd;,"-,,* %:-_
6    C
                                                    &#xa3;    *\    *,,,c*8&#xa5;,                          .    *.D, 10.& o~-4t'-    -a  c".er lj -n  c, :  +t,,_  Voe.ke 4,,    4 ,re~ cc
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI            NEI UD] N/AD]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
V4L4. Z - 4c...a  =.%,-,,              0- *,.
c    + 6,            r-e'h eAL-.- &#xfd;    4'  ,c. ;&Lce
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                    Ylfl*O    UEI N/A    I1
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free            YPND U[]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?                                  N Other Adverse Conditions S11.Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could        Yo(NEI U'-
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
F.leP-Y00    cc-',-,--*
                            &A                    Sizc 00                i,*.ta.,c*;    &#xfd;eee,.
Evaluated by:                I.-rIa',s                                                Date:    ,a51.-!4_
Page 166 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT.01, VERSION 1.0 j5cv  -3,        j RD~
                                    !r        ~      ph4.OM..
T6-_-I-IF- 0 J,    =PC-ZC- c&#xfd;.Al-.r                              _gq&#xfd;b&#xfd;
                                                                          &#xfd;Leett-m~&.        pkej ovt. 4t.S  o-6*S 44-      aid  ,    4-k  wgh%    rot. 4      A Ma4wv*l 1        7 4m          zr*,4-4.~                                    -A 1
                      -nc s,,    V y A.      v  s 4w    rs&#xfd;d&#xfd;  -#a    o
* 0    t acheeo'-%l16&W 0%      SW          64-a64-        m%.i            e.+f        A4 Page 167 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS          NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 168 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS          NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 169 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS          NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 170 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of Status: Y[] ND UA Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment fD No. Q1H24E506                      Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4,16KV SWITCHGEAR 1K LOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bldg. SWIS              FloorEL 188            Rbom, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Cheeldist This checklist maybe used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWBL. The space below each of the following, questions.mihay be used to record the results ofjudginents and findings.. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comnients, Anchorage 1, Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one  Y[  NO of the 50% of:SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchoragefree.of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?              YE NO  EA      N/AE]
: 31. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface            YO NE UIl] N/AE oxidatioii?                                                                              U
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in. the concrete near the anchors?    YO NE Uj N/A-
: 5. Is&#xfd; the anchorage conf!gur4tion consistent with plani.douminentation?          YE NE U1E IN/AE (Note: This quiestion only applies if the iten is one of the 50/.for which an anchorage.configuration verification~is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free:of            YE NE    .Uq.
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
IEnter the equipment classname from Appendix B: Classes doEquipment.
Page 171 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                            NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of X4 Status: YOI NI] UZ&#xfd; Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. Q1H21E506                    Equip,.Class' 20                : .
EquipmentDescription 4,16KV SWtTCHGEAR 1K LOCAL CONTPANEL interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by~nearby equipment or structures?        Y17 NEn UO N/AD
                                                                                            /'
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and. lighting,  Y      NE] U    N./AD and mas'niy block walls not.likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to-avoid damage?                "/M NO UD1 N/AD
: 10. Based on the. above seissmic interaction evaluations, is equipment, free          SND; UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse;Conditions I I. Have you looked for and found no.other seismic conditions that could        Y    &#xfd;ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
  'Evaluated bK v:i                  tI2-          1tt-FR.A :MIA.uxf4w)U Date:
                                            /m oa              -ua        a Page 172 of 561
9 CHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 9
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0
                                                                                    -I'
                                                                        .. ,.        0' Page 173 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0
        ,* /-.q 5" ,C.............
Page 174 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0
    '-44 Sheet 1 ofXt Status: YrtZ ND" U@
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC).
Equipment ID No, Q1H21E527                      Equip. Class 20 Equipment .Descrptii6n, DIESEL GENERA TOR1BtBOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bldg. DIESEL            Floor El. 155--          Room, Area, M\4anufacturer, Model, Etc. (optiona but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results ofthe Seismic Walkdown of an item. of equipment on the SW EL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findiings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
          .1. Is the anchorage configurattion verifibation'required (i.e., is the item one  YX NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring: such verification)?
ArY~hov is fsf&.0 po.4-WCA wldie                            vr notV          Ibit cd&#xfd;-H      +ry'e- , o            voI          t hardware?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose YoJ NOl Up N/Afl
: 3. Is the anchoragefree of corrosion that is more than mildsurface oxidation?
VYEJ NEI UAZ N/AEI
: 4. Is the ancborage.free of visible cracks in the concrete nebl the anchors?
YO NF1 UM, N/Afl
: 5. Is the. anchorage configuration Consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question. only applies if the item is~one of the.50%.for whichl an anchorage. configuration verification is required.)
YO NOl UP- NA 6: BaSed on the Above anichorage eYaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
:' Enter theequipment class name from Appendix B-.Classs offEiiipinenit.
Page 175 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                          NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 ofZ*
Status: Y] NU U*
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC),
Equipment ID No. QIH21E527                    Equip. Class' 20
  .Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1B LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment. or struct'res?      Yj% NEI. U0 NiAD it4(&#xfd;4~et CAAC0~4A      J~LA
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and, lighting, YA ND UD N/AEJ and masomny block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequateflexibility to avoid damage"                Y% NDI Ur N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment, free    Y4, ND uD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could            NDI' UD adversely affect the safety functions Of the equipment?                    /
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary),
Evaluatedy                                                            jU) Lt:2./6tDaX, L
Lxpw-o1        accAcqj Page 176 of 561
9                                                                                  0 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 177 of 561
O ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIOR Page 178 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheetol of A--
Status: Y[L N* Ufj (SWC)S Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equiipmenit 1ll)No, Q1H21NBAFP26o5A                Equip. ClassI 20, Equipment Description HOT SHUTDOWN PANEL A Location:          AUXILIARY Ftoor'El, 121                    Room, .Bldg..
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but rie;ommend.ed)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the.results of the Seismic Watkdown of an item of equipment.6on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be, used torecord thezresults ofjudgments. and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting othedr omiOents.
    .Anchorage 1t. Is the anchorage configuration verification requilred (i.e., is the item one  YI)  NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?,
        .2. Is the anchoragvfree of bent, broken,. missing0or loosehardware?                Yq,NED UD N/-AEF
: 3. Isthe anchorage free of corrosion.that is more.than minld surface              Y&#xfd;    NE, UE N./An oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free. of visible cracksin. the concrete near the anchors?      YU NE uQ]; N/AD Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?          5V NEI UE N/AE]
(Notn: T'his question, only applies if the item is one of the 50% for
:which an anchorage con*fgurtion, verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evalhatioris, is the anchorage free of            YN NE UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
IEnter the equipment el ass natne fromn Appendix B: Claqses~ofEquipment.
Page 179 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                            NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0
.                .F1&#xfd;4n SI      k Sheet2-offp
:Seismic Waikdown Checklistt (SWC)
Status: YE] N[W UE]
EquipmnenvtD No. Q1H21NAFrP2605A Equip. Class' 20
      *Equipment.Description HOTSHUTDOWN PANEL A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free fromrimpact by nearby equipmeni or structures?          11  ND UD N!/AD
          ,8. Are overhead equipmren!, distribt!tion'systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,  Y0 ND UD N/AD&#xfd; and masonry block.watls not likely to'collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                Y9 ND UDI N/AD3
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free          Y50 ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions 1.1, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could          YED NK UD adversely affece the slafety fuxttions of the equipment?
A cair~\            00r co, Th&#xfd; fm 4oV                              tP vye - OA-"C            CV6 A)-11l-cvfA Com mients (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by., *~ju AA              (ct          &aL.WolvMa~a                      Date;    f3L-5:9/jz Ii      z-Page 180 of 561
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION19 i
Page 181 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS            NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 182 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS              NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0
        .- f,, -'cl)'
Page 183 of 561}}

Latest revision as of 09:44, 6 February 2020

SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page 141 of 561 - Page 183 of 561
ML12355A782
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Miktus P
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2266 SNCF164-RPT-01, Ver 1.0
Download: ML12355A782 (43)


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 rA qj Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YN NE] Ui0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment(D No: QIHIINGR2504t, Equip; Class' pkg F141 EquipmentDescription RADIATION MONITOR PANEL Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor EL. 155 Room, Area ___

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item Of equipiment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used toxrecord the results ofjudgments and findintgs. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting 6ther conanetits.

Anchorag I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2.. Is the, anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NE] UE] N/AN

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YYO NE] UE] N/AR]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage:free of visible:cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NEI UE] N/A0
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NE] UE NIA0 (Note: Tthis question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuratidn verification is required.)

Reference U733260 V2

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE] UM potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enier-flie equipnlentcdas ihale frohi AppcndixB:; Classes 6f Eqbipinent.

Page 141 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

~171\ Sheet 2 status: YG] Nn UD of 6 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QHIH1NGR25041, Equip. Class- 20 Pka Fl-41 Equipment Description. RADIATION MONITOR PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets freefro'm impact by nearby equipment orstructures? YMJ NEI UE] NiAE
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO' NEI UE] N/AE3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No overhead items.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NE1 UE1 N/A-Visible Conduits adequately flexible.

Also cabinetis very rigid.

1:0. Based oh the. above seismic interaction evaluationsi, is equipment free Yg NE1 UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Haye you looked for and found no other, seismic conditions thatcould YZ Ni"UE]

adversely affect .the safety finctions of the equipment?

Corn ments Addi'tional pages may be added as necessary)

Cabinet adjacent(N-42).per D-175069 is< 3/4 "away, but adequately stiff to pose no,adverse seismic I/A concern, This package was originally signed on 8-214-2 but retyped for clarify on 10-15-12.

Evaluated by: ,Ste*en Yun by,,,Telecon /vIi a Date: V-21/12 Paul Miktus / J! 8k21/2 Page 142 of 561

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONP Page 143 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

<4 Page 144 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 II 1FI-,cY)

I 76 Page 145 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONV

,Tl Page 146 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheeti of 14 StatuS: YN NRl ULI Seismic.Walkdown Checklist (SWC),

Equipment.ID No. QIHIINGSSP2506G Equip. Class ,206 Equipmeont Descrpntion SOLID STATE.,PROTECTION INPUT CABINET Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY FoorEl. 155, Room, Area 416 Mantufacturer., Modei, Etc. (optio6bal.btitiec6mmcnd&Id)

Instructions for. Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document:the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item. of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of tile, fklowing.questions maybe used to record the results of judgments and:

findings. Additional space, i§ pr6ovided itt the end.of.this§ cheekist for documenting otlier cofoments, Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one :YZ NO of the 50% of SWEL item s requiringsuh verficaion)?

2.. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y. ,NO UEIC N/A*E

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that -is more than mild surface YN NENiUF] N/AF-oxidation?

4-. Isthe anchorage free of visible-cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y NE]. Un N/AMI

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NE] UE] N/AE-(Note: This questiobnonly Aippjies if the item is one of-tle.,50% for which an anchorage configurationverification is required.).

Refer-ence SEWS'for'QIHI ING.SSP2506J dated 5/25/94 and 2506G:

5/25/94., Verified ahchorage.bqy.-puIlingup carpet from front and back of QIHI1NSSP2506G, IH&4I.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchoragefree of Y[9 NE] UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

DOEterthquj~imicnt class niame 660m Aflpendix.,B: Classes ofEquipnient.

Page 147 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2of 14 Status- YO NEI Un Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIHi INGSSP25O6G Equip. Class' 20

, Pkg FI-42 Eq-auipment Descrip ion SOLID STATE PROTECTION INPUT CABINET Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or-structures? YZJ NEI iEI 1NIA
8. Are overhead equipment, distffibutiofi systems, deiling tiles and lightinf, Y* NE Ui N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the.equipment?
9. DO attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage YZ NE UO N/AO
10. Based on the above. seismic inteaction.eyiluations, is equipmenit free YZ NO UE of potentially adverse'.seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1j. Have you.looked for and found no other seismic conditions thatcould YGl NEI UE adversely affect the safety fimetions of the equipment?,

No Comments Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cabinetadjacent(N-42) per D-175069 is < 3/4" away, but adequately stiff to pose: no adverse seismic I/A concern.

This package was originally signed on 8-21-12 but retyped for clarity on 10-15-12.

Evaliaked .hv- Date- 8121112 PaukMiktus &21,112 2

Page 148 of 561

9 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION A-i r4A Page 149 of 561

9 is ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 150 of 561

m z

cn) m

-I C/)

CD 0

01I a?

z 0

Ci) z 7) 0 m

C/)

0 z.

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIO*

Page 152 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .10 4'

Page 153 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONRO Page 154 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 155 of 561

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .0 Page 156 of 561

9IACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .V Page 157 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONO Page 158 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.00 Page 159 of 561

9 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 160 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sh$1ee-t 1 f statu'§: YLJ NO ~

Seismic Walkdo Checklist (SWC)

Equipmen lIDNo. Q1H21EO05-3. Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description 4, 16KV SWITCHGEAR&1G LOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bdg. AUXILIARY FloorEl. 12.1 Rkbm, Area -

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. '(optional bit.recommiended)

InstructionsI for Completing Checklist.

This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an iem of equipment on the SWEL. The*spa. below each of the following questionsitmay be used to record ibe tesults of judgmrents and findings. Additional spaceis provided atthe end of this checklist fordocumenting other domments.,

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required'(i.e., is theitem one Y96 ND of0ile kd%of SWEL items requii'ring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?, 'Y ND N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more~than mildsurface YO ND Ug"N/AD oxidation?

4, hs the anchorage free of visible cracks in the.concrete near the anchors? Y ND UFD N/AD S. Is h*tanchorage~configuration consistent with plant documentation? YD NDI N/AD (Note: Thifs question-only applies if the item is one of the 53% for which an anchorage configuration verification*. is required.)

+

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YD ND potentially adverse seisrmic conditioins?
  • c41L o~4 ua . 4 -~

Enter th~eeq~r~tcsname tFrom AppondixB: Ct are fEquipm~ent.

Page 161 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet a2ofyq Status: YO NEI] U[0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist.(SWC)

Equipment.1 No- QIH21EO05 Equip. Glass* 20..

Equipment Descri pioni .o416KV SWITCHGEAR IG LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Arc soft targets free-from impact by nearby, equipment:or structres? Y~fNO. UO:JN/AQ
8. Are overhead equipment, distribdition systems, ceiling files and lighting, YILJ NOl UO.N/AO iand iasoniy 'block Wa tsl not likely to collapse onto. the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage. I ONEI Ti N/AC,
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y6NO U0J ofpotentially adverse, seismic. interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and fdund no other seismic conditions that :culd y5( NEI UC adversely affec6tithe safety functions of the equiomeni?

Comments (Additioaal pages hay:oe added as necessary)

. . .. .,... [ . .. '

E-valuated by: ~ ~ ' iQ&u- D~ate: ___________

\,J Page 162 of 561

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .10 Page 163 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

. P, .

Page 164 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 f--k-A Sheet 1 of-i-Status: YE-- NE-- UJ*'

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1H21E505 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR IJ LOCAL CONTROL PANEL Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155' Room, Area 0056C Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YX'N" of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

RQ~e,-c..Wc CNCX.Cý 17- (icm

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO- N- UP(N/A--

~ c.3eA- vjk ý 'e ~ 0A ~~.k'~.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UpJ[ N/AI oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NBI UO N/Ar"
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NB UOEf'N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NBi UF potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 165 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 Of 7 Status: Yfl] NF- UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) S Equipment ID No. 01H21E505 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 1J LOCAL CONTROL PANEL.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YJ%/NEJ UD] N/AD]

C___&,.4 ".- - ý,"-,,* %:-_

6 C

£ *\ *,,,c*8¥, . *.D, 10.& o~-4t'- -a c".er lj -n c, : +t,,_ Voe.ke 4,, 4 ,re~ cc

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NEI UD] N/AD]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

V4L4. Z - 4c...a =.%,-,, 0- *,.

c + 6, r-e'h eAL-.- ý 4' ,c. ;&Lce

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Ylfl*O UEI N/A I1
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YPND U[]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? N Other Adverse Conditions S11.Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo(NEI U'-

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

F.leP-Y00 cc-',-,--*

&A Sizc 00 i,*.ta.,c*; ýeee,.

Evaluated by: I.-rIa',s Date: ,a51.-!4_

Page 166 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT.01, VERSION 1.0 j5cv -3, j RD~

!r ~ ph4.OM..

T6-_-I-IF- 0 J, =PC-ZC- cý.Al-.r _gqýbý

ýLeett-m~&. pkej ovt. 4t.S o-6*S 44- aid , 4-k wgh% rot. 4 A Ma4wv*l 1 7 4m zr*,4-4.~ -A 1

-nc s,, V y A. v s 4w rsýdý -#a o

  • 0 t acheeo'-%l16&W 0% SW 64-a64- m%.i e.+f A4 Page 167 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 168 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 169 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 170 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of Status: Y[] ND UA Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment fD No. Q1H24E506 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4,16KV SWITCHGEAR 1K LOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bldg. SWIS FloorEL 188 Rbom, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Cheeldist This checklist maybe used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWBL. The space below each of the following, questions.mihay be used to record the results ofjudginents and findings.. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comnients, Anchorage 1, Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NO of the 50% of:SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchoragefree.of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NO EA N/AE]
31. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NE UIl] N/AE oxidatioii? U
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in. the concrete near the anchors? YO NE Uj N/A-
5. Isý the anchorage conf!gur4tion consistent with plani.douminentation? YE NE U1E IN/AE (Note: This quiestion only applies if the iten is one of the 50/.for which an anchorage.configuration verification~is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free:of YE NE .Uq.

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment classname from Appendix B: Classes doEquipment.

Page 171 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of X4 Status: YOI NI] UZý Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1H21E506 Equip,.Class' 20  : .

EquipmentDescription 4,16KV SWtTCHGEAR 1K LOCAL CONTPANEL interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by~nearby equipment or structures? Y17 NEn UO N/AD

/'

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and. lighting, Y NE] U N./AD and mas'niy block walls not.likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to-avoid damage? "/M NO UD1 N/AD
10. Based on the. above seissmic interaction evaluations, is equipment, free SND; UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse;Conditions I I. Have you looked for and found no.other seismic conditions that could Y ýND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

'Evaluated bK v:i tI2- 1tt-FR.A :MIA.uxf4w)U Date:

/m oa -ua a Page 172 of 561

9 CHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 9

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

-I'

.. ,. 0' Page 173 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

,* /-.q 5" ,C.............

Page 174 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

'-44 Sheet 1 ofXt Status: YrtZ ND" U@

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC).

Equipment ID No, Q1H21E527 Equip. Class 20 Equipment .Descrptii6n, DIESEL GENERA TOR1BtBOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155-- Room, Area, M\4anufacturer, Model, Etc. (optiona but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results ofthe Seismic Walkdown of an item. of equipment on the SW EL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findiings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

.1. Is the anchorage configurattion verifibation'required (i.e., is the item one YX NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring: such verification)?

ArY~hov is fsf&.0 po.4-WCA wldie vr notV Ibit cdý-H +ry'e- , o voI t hardware?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose YoJ NOl Up N/Afl
3. Is the anchoragefree of corrosion that is more than mildsurface oxidation?

VYEJ NEI UAZ N/AEI

4. Is the ancborage.free of visible cracks in the concrete nebl the anchors?

YO NF1 UM, N/Afl

5. Is the. anchorage configuration Consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question. only applies if the item is~one of the.50%.for whichl an anchorage. configuration verification is required.)

YO NOl UP- NA 6: BaSed on the Above anichorage eYaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter theequipment class name from Appendix B-.Classs offEiiipinenit.

Page 175 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 ofZ*

Status: Y] NU U*

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC),

Equipment ID No. QIH21E527 Equip. Class' 20

.Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1B LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment. or struct'res? Yj% NEI. U0 NiAD it4(ý4~et CAAC0~4A J~LA
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and, lighting, YA ND UD N/AEJ and masomny block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequateflexibility to avoid damage" Y% NDI Ur N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment, free Y4, ND uD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NDI' UD adversely affect the safety functions Of the equipment? /

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary),

Evaluatedy jU) Lt:2./6tDaX, L

Lxpw-o1 accAcqj Page 176 of 561

9 0 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 177 of 561

O ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIOR Page 178 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheetol of A--

Status: Y[L N* Ufj (SWC)S Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equiipmenit 1ll)No, Q1H21NBAFP26o5A Equip. ClassI 20, Equipment Description HOT SHUTDOWN PANEL A Location: AUXILIARY Ftoor'El, 121 Room, .Bldg..

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but rie;ommend.ed)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the.results of the Seismic Watkdown of an item of equipment.6on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be, used torecord thezresults ofjudgments. and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting othedr omiOents.

.Anchorage 1t. Is the anchorage configuration verification requilred (i.e., is the item one YI) NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?,

.2. Is the anchoragvfree of bent, broken,. missing0or loosehardware? Yq,NED UD N/-AEF

3. Isthe anchorage free of corrosion.that is more.than minld surface Yý NE, UE N./An oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free. of visible cracksin. the concrete near the anchors? YU NE uQ]; N/AD Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? 5V NEI UE N/AE]

(Notn: T'his question, only applies if the item is one of the 50% for

which an anchorage con*fgurtion, verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evalhatioris, is the anchorage free of YN NE UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment el ass natne fromn Appendix B: Claqses~ofEquipment.

Page 179 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

. .F1ý4n SI k Sheet2-offp

Seismic Waikdown Checklistt (SWC)

Status: YE] N[W UE]

EquipmnenvtD No. Q1H21NAFrP2605A Equip. Class' 20

  • Equipment.Description HOTSHUTDOWN PANEL A Interaction Effects
7. Are soft targets free fromrimpact by nearby equipmeni or structures? 11 ND UD N!/AD

,8. Are overhead equipmren!, distribt!tion'systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 ND UD N/ADý and masonry block.watls not likely to'collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y9 ND UDI N/AD3
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y50 ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1.1, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NK UD adversely affece the slafety fuxttions of the equipment?

A cair~\ 00r co, Thý fm 4oV tP vye - OA-"C CV6 A)-11l-cvfA Com mients (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by., *~ju AA (ct &aL.WolvMa~a Date; f3L-5:9/jz Ii z-Page 180 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION19 i

Page 181 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 182 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

.- f,, -'cl)'

Page 183 of 561