ML18031A239: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 08/14/1979
| issue date = 08/14/1979
| title = Discusses Des Re Use of 2,4,5-T Weed Control Agent in rights-of-way.Study of Coal & U Fuel Cycles Should Include Indirect Effect of Mining on Landscape
| title = Discusses Des Re Use of 2,4,5-T Weed Control Agent in rights-of-way.Study of Coal & U Fuel Cycles Should Include Indirect Effect of Mining on Landscape
| author name = VANDENBURG D O
| author name = Vandenburg D
| author affiliation = AGRICULTURE, DEPT. OF
| author affiliation = AGRICULTURE, DEPT. OF
| addressee name = REGAN R H
| addressee name = Regan R
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION (NRR)
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION (NRR)
| docket = 05000387, 05000388
| docket = 05000387, 05000388
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULAT RY INFORMATION OISTRIBUTION SYSTEM                (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:7908210409                      OOC  ~ DATE: 79/08/14        NOTARIZED:  NO      DOCKET FACI    '                usquehanna      Steam    Electric Stationp Unit      1E  Pennsylva 05000387 50-38            szuehanna      Steam    Electric Stationg Unit      2E  Pennsylva 05000388 A  H ~                        AUTHOR  AFFILIATION VA DENBURGPD        ~ 0.      Agriculture<Dept,of RECIP ~ NAME                  RECIPIENT AFFILIATION BEGAN,R,H,                          Environmental Projects Branch 2
==SUBJECT:==
Discusses OES re use of 2<4>5 T weed control agent in rights of way.Study of coal                8,  u fuel cycles should include indirect effect of mining on landscape, 0 ISTRIBUTION COBE:
T I TI  E COOZS  COPIES RECEI ENY IRON ~ COMMENTS ~
I/EO:LTR    f ENCL  +  SIZE:
TES N OTE  ~
          ~
SS4'D 2 RE-E>>>><<<<
            >>>><<>><<>>>>>>>>>>              3 CuS    FSRR V Hr'-C. Iht'D7K 6 8 NC/>>>>>>>><<>>7<<>>>>>>e<<>>>><<
                                          <<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>See<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<  ~  ~    E<++V T+~+G  (d'All
                                                                                                      >>>>>> )
RECIPIENT                COP  IES              REC IP IENT        COPIES IO CODE/NAME                  LTTR ENCL            IO CODE/NAME        LTTR ENCL ACTION:        05 PM g i SECII.                                  17 BC    S'~6'W 18 LA                                            AO      moo RM INTERNAl.:                                      1              02 NRC PDR              1 07                              2                09 ENVN SPEC BR        1    1 10    CST BNFT ANL                1              11 TA/EOO              1 12    AO SITE TECH                2              14 ACDENl ANALY        1 15    EFLT TRT SYS                1              16 RAD ASMT BH          1 19    OIR OSE                    1              AO ENVIRON TECH        1 AD.SITE ANALY                    1              OELO                    1 EXTERNAL'3          LPOR                                        04 NSIC                1    1 20 NATL LAB                                      ACRS                    1    0 CA-z.~R L~R W~ Bc WIn/ EC C~g +&~f7 I,ye<>> r',e" I
                              'L TOTAL    NUeMBER    OF    COPIES REQUIRE.O: LTTR            ~
93    ENCL 0
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE (2I) 596-I672 1950 August  l4, l979 Mr. William H. Regan, Jr.
Environmental Projects Branch 2 Division of Site Safety        and.
8 Environmental Analysis U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission I- Washington, D. C.        20555 Refer  to:  Docket No. 50-387, 50-388 Draft Environmental Statement Operation of Susquehanna    Steam Electric Station,  PA
==Dear Mr. Regan:==
Our Milwaukee Off Ice has forwarded this Statement to us for review and comment, as National Forest lands are not involved.
The proposed use      of 2,4,5-7 as    a weed control agent in rlghts-of-way ls    ll legal foi lowing  the emergency order by EPA suspend-ing use of 2,'4,5-T on forests rights-of-way, and pastures (Federal Register Yot 44, page l5874, March I5, l979). Ne believe a discussion of alternative weed-control methods should be Included ln the Final Statement            Formulations of ammonium sulfamate, d lcamba or bromacll could be considered Discussion of the coal and uranium fuel cycles should Include the indirect effect of mining on The landscape. This effect ls becoming more severe as the more productive sites are ex-hausted and more digging ls needed for every ton of fuel.
Thank you    for the opportunity to    review and comment on    this Statement.
Sine    rely, I(
DA  EO      AND    U Staff Director Environmental      guality Evaluation 5200 11 I1/59)}}

Latest revision as of 17:14, 3 February 2020

Discusses Des Re Use of 2,4,5-T Weed Control Agent in rights-of-way.Study of Coal & U Fuel Cycles Should Include Indirect Effect of Mining on Landscape
ML18031A239
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/14/1979
From: Vandenburg D
AGRICULTURE, DEPT. OF
To: Regan R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7908210409
Download: ML18031A239 (2)


Text

REGULAT RY INFORMATION OISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:7908210409 OOC ~ DATE: 79/08/14 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACI ' usquehanna Steam Electric Stationp Unit 1E Pennsylva 05000387 50-38 szuehanna Steam Electric Stationg Unit 2E Pennsylva 05000388 A H ~ AUTHOR AFFILIATION VA DENBURGPD ~ 0. Agriculture<Dept,of RECIP ~ NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION BEGAN,R,H, Environmental Projects Branch 2

SUBJECT:

Discusses OES re use of 2<4>5 T weed control agent in rights of way.Study of coal 8, u fuel cycles should include indirect effect of mining on landscape, 0 ISTRIBUTION COBE:

T I TI E COOZS COPIES RECEI ENY IRON ~ COMMENTS ~

I/EO:LTR f ENCL + SIZE:

TES N OTE ~

~

SS4'D 2 RE-E>>>><<<<

>>>><<>><<>>>>>>>>>> 3 CuS FSRR V Hr'-C. Iht'D7K 6 8 NC/>>>>>>>><<>>7<<>>>>>>e<<>>>><<

<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>See<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><< ~ ~ E<++V T+~+G (d'All

>>>>>> )

RECIPIENT COP IES REC IP IENT COPIES IO CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL IO CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ACTION: 05 PM g i SECII. 17 BC S'~6'W 18 LA AO moo RM INTERNAl.: 1 02 NRC PDR 1 07 2 09 ENVN SPEC BR 1 1 10 CST BNFT ANL 1 11 TA/EOO 1 12 AO SITE TECH 2 14 ACDENl ANALY 1 15 EFLT TRT SYS 1 16 RAD ASMT BH 1 19 OIR OSE 1 AO ENVIRON TECH 1 AD.SITE ANALY 1 OELO 1 EXTERNAL'3 LPOR 04 NSIC 1 1 20 NATL LAB ACRS 1 0 CA-z.~R L~R W~ Bc WIn/ EC C~g +&~f7 I,ye<>> r',e" I

'L TOTAL NUeMBER OF COPIES REQUIRE.O: LTTR ~

93 ENCL 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE (2I) 596-I672 1950 August l4, l979 Mr. William H. Regan, Jr.

Environmental Projects Branch 2 Division of Site Safety and.

8 Environmental Analysis U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission I- Washington, D. C. 20555 Refer to: Docket No. 50-387, 50-388 Draft Environmental Statement Operation of Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, PA

Dear Mr. Regan:

Our Milwaukee Off Ice has forwarded this Statement to us for review and comment, as National Forest lands are not involved.

The proposed use of 2,4,5-7 as a weed control agent in rlghts-of-way ls ll legal foi lowing the emergency order by EPA suspend-ing use of 2,'4,5-T on forests rights-of-way, and pastures (Federal Register Yot 44, page l5874, March I5, l979). Ne believe a discussion of alternative weed-control methods should be Included ln the Final Statement Formulations of ammonium sulfamate, d lcamba or bromacll could be considered Discussion of the coal and uranium fuel cycles should Include the indirect effect of mining on The landscape. This effect ls becoming more severe as the more productive sites are ex-hausted and more digging ls needed for every ton of fuel.

Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this Statement.

Sine rely, I(

DA EO AND U Staff Director Environmental guality Evaluation 5200 11 I1/59)