ML18031A239: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULAT RY INFORMATION OISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:7908210409 OOC~DATE: 79/08/14 NOTARIZED:
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULAT RY INFORMATION OISTRIBUTION SYSTEM                 (RIDS)
NO DOCKET FACI'usquehanna Steam Electric Stationp Unit 1E Pennsylva 05000387 50-38 szuehanna Steam Electric Stationg Unit 2E Pennsylva 05000388 A H~AUTHOR AFFILIATION VA DENBURGPD~0.Agriculture<Dept,of RECIP~NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION BEGAN,R,H, Environmental Projects Branch 2  
ACCESSION NBR:7908210409                     OOC ~ DATE: 79/08/14       NOTARIZED: NO       DOCKET FACI   '               usquehanna       Steam     Electric Stationp Unit       1E Pennsylva 05000387 50-38           szuehanna     Steam     Electric Stationg Unit       2E Pennsylva 05000388 A   H ~                       AUTHOR   AFFILIATION VA DENBURGPD         ~ 0.       Agriculture<Dept,of RECIP ~ NAME                   RECIPIENT AFFILIATION BEGAN,R,H,                         Environmental Projects Branch 2


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Discusses OES re use of 2<4>5 T weed control agent in rights of way.Study of coal 8, u fuel cycles should include indirect effect of mining on landscape, 0 ISTRIBUTION COBE: COOZS COPIES RECEI I/EO:LTR f ENCL+SIZE: T I TI E ENY IRON~COMMENTS~N TES~SS4'D 2 RE-E 3 CuS FSRR V Hr'-C.Iht'D7K 6~8~NC/E<++V T+~+G (d'All)OTE~>>>><<>><<>>>>>>>>>>
Discusses OES re use of 2<4>5 T weed control agent in rights of way.Study of coal                 8,   u fuel cycles should include indirect effect of mining on landscape, 0 ISTRIBUTION COBE:
>>>><<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>See<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<
T I TI  E COOZS   COPIES RECEI ENY IRON ~ COMMENTS ~
>>>>>>>><<>>7<<>>>>>>e<<>>>><<
I/EO:LTR     f ENCL +   SIZE:
>>>>>>ACTION: INTERNAl.:
TES N OTE  ~
RECIPIENT IO CODE/NAME 05 PM g i SECII.18 LA 07 10 CST BNFT ANL 12 AO SITE TECH 15 EFLT TRT SYS 19 OIR OSE AD.SITE ANALY COP IES LTTR ENCL 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 REC IP IENT IO CODE/NAME 17 BC S'~6'W AO moo RM 02 NRC PDR 09 ENVN SPEC BR 11 TA/EOO 14 ACDENl ANALY 16 RAD ASMT BH AO ENVIRON TECH OELO COPIES LTTR ENCL 1'1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXTERNAL'3 LPOR 20 NATL LAB 04 NSIC ACRS 1 1 1 0 CA-z.~R L~R W~Bc WIn/EC C~g+&~f7 I,ye<>>r',e"'L.>>I 93 0 TOTAL NUeMBER OF COPIES REQUIRE.O:
          ~
LTTR~ENCL UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE (2I)596-I672 1950 August l4, l979 Mr.William H.Regan, Jr.Environmental Projects Branch 2 Division of Site Safety and.Environmental Analysis U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission I-Washington, D.C.20555 8 Refer to: Docket No.50-387, 50-388 Draft Environmental Statement Operation of Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, PA
SS4'D 2 RE-E>>>><<<<
            >>>><<>><<>>>>>>>>>>               3 CuS    FSRR V Hr'-C. Iht'D7K 6 8 NC/>>>>>>>><<>>7<<>>>>>>e<<>>>><<
                                          <<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>See<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><< ~  ~    E<++V T+~+G  (d'All
                                                                                                      >>>>>> )
RECIPIENT                 COP  IES              REC IP IENT        COPIES IO CODE/NAME                  LTTR ENCL            IO CODE/NAME       LTTR ENCL ACTION:        05 PM g i SECII.                                 17 BC   S'~6'W 18 LA                                            AO     moo RM INTERNAl.:                                      1              02 NRC PDR             1 07                              2                09 ENVN SPEC BR         1    1 10    CST BNFT ANL                1              11 TA/EOO               1 12    AO SITE TECH                2              14 ACDENl ANALY         1 15    EFLT TRT SYS                1              16 RAD ASMT BH         1 19    OIR OSE                    1              AO ENVIRON TECH         1 AD.SITE ANALY                    1               OELO                    1 EXTERNAL'3           LPOR                                       04 NSIC                1    1 20 NATL LAB                                       ACRS                   1     0 CA-z.~R L~R W~ Bc WIn/ EC C~g +&~f7 I,ye<>> r',e" I
                              'L TOTAL     NUeMBER     OF     COPIES REQUIRE.O: LTTR           ~
93    ENCL 0


==Dear Mr.Regan:==
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE (2I) 596-I672 1950 August  l4, l979 Mr. William H. Regan, Jr.
Our Milwaukee Off Ice has forwarded this Statement to us for review and comment, as National Forest lands are not involved.The proposed use of 2,4,5-7 as a weed control agent in rlghts-of-way ls ll legal foi lowing the emergency order by EPA suspend-ing use of 2,'4,5-T on forests rights-of-way, and pastures (Federal Register Yot 44, page l5874, March I5, l979).Ne believe a discussion of alternative weed-control methods should be Included ln the Final Statement Formulations of ammonium sulfamate, d lcamba or bromacll could be considered Discussion of the coal and uranium fuel cycles should Include the indirect effect of mining on The landscape.
Environmental Projects Branch 2 Division of Site Safety        and.
This effect ls becoming more severe as the more productive sites are ex-hausted and more digging ls needed for every ton of fuel.Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this Statement.
8 Environmental Analysis U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission I- Washington, D. C.        20555 Refer  to:  Docket No. 50-387, 50-388 Draft Environmental Statement Operation of Susquehanna    Steam Electric Station,  PA
Sine rely, I(DA EO AND U Staff Director Environmental guality Evaluation 5200 11 I1/59)}}
 
==Dear Mr. Regan:==
 
Our Milwaukee Off Ice has forwarded this Statement to us for review and comment, as National Forest lands are not involved.
The proposed use     of 2,4,5-7 as   a weed control agent in rlghts-of-way ls     ll legal foi lowing   the emergency order by EPA suspend-ing use of 2,'4,5-T on forests rights-of-way, and pastures (Federal Register Yot 44, page l5874, March I5, l979). Ne believe a discussion of alternative weed-control methods should be Included ln the Final Statement           Formulations of ammonium sulfamate, d lcamba or bromacll could be considered Discussion of the coal and uranium fuel cycles should Include the indirect effect of mining on The landscape. This effect ls becoming more severe as the more productive sites are ex-hausted and more digging ls needed for every ton of fuel.
Thank you     for the opportunity to     review and comment on   this Statement.
Sine   rely, I(
DA EO     AND     U Staff Director Environmental     guality Evaluation 5200 11 I1/59)}}

Latest revision as of 17:14, 3 February 2020

Discusses Des Re Use of 2,4,5-T Weed Control Agent in rights-of-way.Study of Coal & U Fuel Cycles Should Include Indirect Effect of Mining on Landscape
ML18031A239
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/14/1979
From: Vandenburg D
AGRICULTURE, DEPT. OF
To: Regan R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7908210409
Download: ML18031A239 (2)


Text

REGULAT RY INFORMATION OISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:7908210409 OOC ~ DATE: 79/08/14 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACI ' usquehanna Steam Electric Stationp Unit 1E Pennsylva 05000387 50-38 szuehanna Steam Electric Stationg Unit 2E Pennsylva 05000388 A H ~ AUTHOR AFFILIATION VA DENBURGPD ~ 0. Agriculture<Dept,of RECIP ~ NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION BEGAN,R,H, Environmental Projects Branch 2

SUBJECT:

Discusses OES re use of 2<4>5 T weed control agent in rights of way.Study of coal 8, u fuel cycles should include indirect effect of mining on landscape, 0 ISTRIBUTION COBE:

T I TI E COOZS COPIES RECEI ENY IRON ~ COMMENTS ~

I/EO:LTR f ENCL + SIZE:

TES N OTE ~

~

SS4'D 2 RE-E>>>><<<<

>>>><<>><<>>>>>>>>>> 3 CuS FSRR V Hr'-C. Iht'D7K 6 8 NC/>>>>>>>><<>>7<<>>>>>>e<<>>>><<

<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>See<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><< ~ ~ E<++V T+~+G (d'All

>>>>>> )

RECIPIENT COP IES REC IP IENT COPIES IO CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL IO CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ACTION: 05 PM g i SECII. 17 BC S'~6'W 18 LA AO moo RM INTERNAl.: 1 02 NRC PDR 1 07 2 09 ENVN SPEC BR 1 1 10 CST BNFT ANL 1 11 TA/EOO 1 12 AO SITE TECH 2 14 ACDENl ANALY 1 15 EFLT TRT SYS 1 16 RAD ASMT BH 1 19 OIR OSE 1 AO ENVIRON TECH 1 AD.SITE ANALY 1 OELO 1 EXTERNAL'3 LPOR 04 NSIC 1 1 20 NATL LAB ACRS 1 0 CA-z.~R L~R W~ Bc WIn/ EC C~g +&~f7 I,ye<>> r',e" I

'L TOTAL NUeMBER OF COPIES REQUIRE.O: LTTR ~

93 ENCL 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE (2I) 596-I672 1950 August l4, l979 Mr. William H. Regan, Jr.

Environmental Projects Branch 2 Division of Site Safety and.

8 Environmental Analysis U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission I- Washington, D. C. 20555 Refer to: Docket No. 50-387, 50-388 Draft Environmental Statement Operation of Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, PA

Dear Mr. Regan:

Our Milwaukee Off Ice has forwarded this Statement to us for review and comment, as National Forest lands are not involved.

The proposed use of 2,4,5-7 as a weed control agent in rlghts-of-way ls ll legal foi lowing the emergency order by EPA suspend-ing use of 2,'4,5-T on forests rights-of-way, and pastures (Federal Register Yot 44, page l5874, March I5, l979). Ne believe a discussion of alternative weed-control methods should be Included ln the Final Statement Formulations of ammonium sulfamate, d lcamba or bromacll could be considered Discussion of the coal and uranium fuel cycles should Include the indirect effect of mining on The landscape. This effect ls becoming more severe as the more productive sites are ex-hausted and more digging ls needed for every ton of fuel.

Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this Statement.

Sine rely, I(

DA EO AND U Staff Director Environmental guality Evaluation 5200 11 I1/59)