ML18040B220

Forwards Comments to Each Specific SALP Category,Per 880707 Meeting W/Nrc.Presentations from Meeting Also Encl

ML18040B220
Person / Time
Site:	Susquehanna
Issue date:	07/27/1988
From:	Keiser H PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	Russell W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
PLA-3066, NUDOCS 8808040085
Download: ML18040B220 (95)

Text

A~ CEXZRATED DISTRIBUTION DEMON STRA,'EON SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:8808040085 DOC.DATE: 88/07/27 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-387 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Unit 1, Pennsylva 05000387 50-388 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Unit 2, Pennsylva 05000388 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION KEISER,H.W. Pennsylvania Power 6 Light Co.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

.RUSSELL,W.T. Region 1, Ofc of the Director

SUBJECT:

Responds to SALP rept for 1988.Viewgraphs re health physics improvements s maint enhancement program encl.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE40D TITLE: Systematic Assessment NOTES:LPDR 2 COPIES RECEIVED:LTR cys Transcripts.

I ENCL of Licensee Performance j SIZE:

(SALP) Report 05000387S LPDR 2 cys Transcripts. 05000388 RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID, CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PDl-2 LA 1 0 PD1-2 PD 1 1 THADANZ,M 1 1 INTERNAL: ACRS 2 2 AEOD BAILEYI B 1 0 AEOD/DOA 1 1 AEOD/DSP/TPAB 1 1 COMMISSION 5 5 DEDRO 1 1 NRR MORISSEAU,D NRR/DLPQ/PEB NRR/DREP/EPB 10 ll 1 1

1 1

1 1

NRR/DLPQ/HFB 10 NRR/DOEA/EAB 11 NRR/DREP/RPB 10 1

1 1

1 1

1 NRR/DRIS DIR 9A 1 1 NRR/DRIS/RSGB 9 1 1 NRR/DRIS/SGB 9D 1 1 NRR/DRIS/SIB 9A 1 1 NRR/PMAS/ILRB12 1 1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT- 1 1 0 BERMAN I J 1 1 OGC/HDS2 1 1 REG FIL 02 1 1 RGN1 FILE 01 1 1 EXTERNAL: H ST LOBBY WARD 1 1 LPDR 2 2 R

NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC 1 1 NOTES 2 2 I

h TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 37 ENCL 35

4 i Pennsylvania Power 8 Light Company Two North Ninth Street ~ Allentown, PA 18101 ~ 215/7705151 JUL 27 $ 88 Harold W. Keiser Senior Vice President. Nuclear 215/770 4194 Mr. William T. Russell Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION RESPONSE TO 1988 SALP Docket Nos. 50-387 PLA-3066 FILE R41-2 .and 50-388

Dear Mr. Russell:

We appreciated the opportunity to meet with you and your staff on July 7, 1988 to review the latest Region 1 assessment of PPSL's performance. While we recognize that the SALP Board Report was generally favorable, we welcome your suggestions and will continue to seek to improve our performance in all areas.

In reviewing the report we noted several concerns of NRC. Most of these were discussed at the meeting and we believe these discussions were mutually beneficial.

Attached to this letter are copies of the presentations made at the meeting and PP&L's comments to each specific SALP category. Where weaknesses were identified our corrective action strategy has been included.

Very truly yours, H. W. Keiser Attachments cc: NRC Document Control Desk (original)

NRC Region I Mr. F. I. Young, Sr. Resident Inspector Mr. M. C. Thadani, NRC Project Manager 8808040085 880727 PDR *DOCK 05000387 G . PNU

1 SALP COMMENTS SALP CATEGORY PLANT OPERATIONS (A) h

'PP&L concurs with the assessment made in the area of Plant Operations.

Isolated instances of valve misalignment and post maintenance/modification testing have occurred; however, PP&L believes our corrective actions taken have alleviated these concerns.

PP&L believes our upgraded corrective action program, initiated following the 1986 SALP report, is successful in effectively addressing open issues. The early events, identified in this SALP report, are indicative of a program in its infancy. Events that occurred later in the period were handled effectively.

SALP CATEGORY CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS (B)

PP&L concurs with the NRC assessment in the area of Chemistry and Radiological Controls. Specific management actions PP&L is taking to address the weaknesses identified in the report include: establishment of a permanent highly qualified staff, increased worker involvement and raising of the station work practice standards, upgrading the station's contamination control program and improved containment work management. The status of 29 specific items identified by PP&L are included in the attached copies of the presentations.

Weaknesses identified in the chemistry program are being vigorously addressed and include: upgrading the chemistry specification program, enhancing chemistry monitoring, implementing selected chemistry system enhancements, enhancing technician training and upgrading the waste management program.

SALP CATEGORY MAINTENANCE (C)

PP&L concurs with the NRC assessment in this area. PP&L considers maintenance to be one of our strengths. This was further confirmed by the SALP category 1 rating. We also believe in continual improvement; therefore, the maintenance enhancement program was initiated, in 1986. The most recent initiatives include: review of the maintenance organization and staffing, and review of the interface and control of support work forces. Specific highlights of the program can be found in PP&L presentations made at the SALP meeting.

Corrective actions taken to address operational testing following maintenance and modification work will be addressed at the NRC-PP&L management meeting tentatively scheduled for September 1988.

SALP CATEGORY SURVEILLANCE (D)

PP&L concurs with the surveillance assessment made in the SALP report. No weaknesses in the surveillance program were identified during the period.

SALP CATEGORY EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS (E)

PP&L concurs with the assessment made on Emergency Preparedness. No weaknesses in this program were identified during the period.

To further improve emergency preparedness, PP&L has initiated efforts to make emergency exercises more realistic. PP&L invited INPO to conduct an assistance visit in emergency planning. The focus of the assistance visit is improving in-plant simulation during exercises by transferring techniques used successfully at other nuclear facilities. PP&L will also use the training Simulator in conducting the 1988 Health Physics Drill; this should significantly improve realism for the operators.

SALP CATEGORY SECURITY AND SAFEGUARDS (F)

PP&L concurs with the Security and Safeguards assessment, made by the NRC. No weaknesses in these programs were identified during the SALP reporting period.

SALP CATEGORY REFUELING AND OUTAGE MANAGEMENT (G)

PP&L concurs with the assessment made in the area of refueling and outage management. Although a few examples of potential management lapses were identified in the report and at the SALP meeting, Outage Management played a major role in resolving and coordinating the corrective actions associated with these events. We consider it a critical asset to the efficient operation of the plant. PP&L has and is continuing to take steps to determine the root causes of the events that occurred during the outage. A Unit 2 2nd refueling and inspection outage task force has been created to determine and resolve the issues surrounding the major events that occurred during this outage. The status of this committee's activities will be presented at the NRC-PP&L management meeting tentatively scheduled for September 1988.

SALP CATEGORY LICENSING ACTIVITIES (H)

PP&L concurs with the assessment made in this area. Although no weaknesses in Licensing activities were identified during the period an issue related to actions submitted on an emergency basis was noted. PP&L will be sensitive to these concerns when processing emergency actions in the future.

SALP CATEGORY ENGINEERING SUPPORT (I)

PP&L concurs with the assessment made in the Engineering Support area.

Equipment Qualification (EQ) weaknesses identified in the SALP report are being addressed. With the creation of a dedicated EQ staff in 1987, enhancements to the EQ program, which include the SALP issues are being undertaken.

At the enforcement conference on June 30, 1988, NRC indicated that they were pleased with PP&L presentations and our efforts to address the EQ issues.

SALP CATEGORY ASSURANCE OF UALITY (J)

PP&L concurs with the assessment made in the area of Assurance of Quality. No weaknesses in these programs were identified during the SALP reporting period.

SALP CATEGORY TRAINING AND UALIFICATION EFFECTIVENESS (K)

PPGL concurs with the assessment made in these areas. PP6L recognizes that the current simulator does not meet the March 1991 regulatory requirements and is therefore undertaking a major simulator upgrade modification project.

Management will closely monitor the progress of this project.

ggg s HEALTH PHYSICS IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES o THE 4 INITIATIVES RESULTED IN 29 INDIVIDUAL ACTIONS o 24 OF 29 ACTIONS COMPLETE o THE REMAINING 5 SCHEDULED FOR COMPt ETION BY YEAR END

HEALTH PHYSICS IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES JANUARY 1988 STATUS o ESTABLISH A PERMANENT HIGHLY QUALIFIED STAFF.

o INCREASE WORKER INVOLVEMENT AND RAISE THE STATION WORK PRACTICE STANDARDS.

o UPGRADE THE STATION'S CONTAMINATION CONTROL PROGRAM.

o IMPROVE CONTAINMENT WORK MANAGEMENT.

OUTAGE CRITIIXE ujTAGL. TASK l=ORCE INPO OUTAGE ASSESSYENT INITIATIVES SCilE YFF RITUAL ASSESS%fl INPO PLANT ASSESS'BIT

PPCL/NRC MEETING ON HEALTH PHYSICS JANUARY 29, 1988 PP&L COMMITMENTS STATUS/

ITEM RESPONSIBLE COMMITMENT GROUP DATE

1) TERMINATE USE OF TEMPORARY TECH/OUTAGE COMPLETE SUMPS IN CONTAINMENT, MANAGEMENT

2) UPGRADE FREQUENCY AND CONTENT HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE OF HP/WORKER COMMUNICATIONS IN CONTAINMENT.

3) PROVIDE REAL TIME AIR MONITORING HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE EQUIPMENT AT 3 ELEVATIONS IN CONTAINMENT.

4) FORM INTERDEPARTMENTAL TASK MANAGEMENT COMPLETE FORCE ON INSUlATION.

A) PREPARE GUIDELINES FOR INSULATION HANDLING.

5) REINFORCE ROVING IN-CONTAINMENT ASSISTANT COMPLETE LINE SUPERVISION. SUPERINTENDENT A) ESTABLISH CRITERIA FOR AND REQUIRE IN-PROGRESS ALARA REVIEWS FOR NON-HP SUPERVISORS.

B) .

CONDUCT TRAINING OF NON-HP SUPERVISORS CONDUCTING IN-PROGRESS ALARA REVIEWS.

~E I STATUS/

ITEM RESPONSIBLE COMMITMENT GROUP DATE

6) PROVIDE PPRL SENIOR TECHNICIANS HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE AT CONTAINMENT AND REFUEL FLOOR CONTROL POINTS DURING NORMAL WORK DAYS.

7) TWO ADDITIONAL HEALTH HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE PHYSICISTS IN PLACE NOW.

8) RECRUIT TWO ADDITIONAL HEALTH PHYSICS ONE HIRED PERMANENT HEALTH PHYSICISTS, RECRUITING ONE

9) RECRU IT TEN ADD ITIONAL HEALTH PHYSICS ALL IN PPRL TECHNICIANS. TRAINING

10) PROMOTE SIX HP TECHNICIANS HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE TO SENIOR TECHNICIANS.

11) CONDUCT UNIT 2 SRIO.WITH HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE SEASONED ALARA STAFF. (STAFF THAT WAS IN PLACE FOR UNIT 1 TRIO).

12) CONDUCT STATION SUPERVISORS PERFORMANCE. COMPLETE AWARENESS TRAINING. ENHANCEMENT TEAM

13) CONDUCT STATION WORKERS WORK GROUPS COMPlETE TRAINING.

14) DISTRIBUTE AWARENESS CARDS WORK GROUPS COMPLETE AND POSTERS.

k

15) DESIGNATE PPRL TRAINING HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE COORDINATOR FOR HP TECHNICIAN TRAINING.

STATUS/

ITEM RESPONSIBLE COMMITMENT

. GROUP DATE

16) INCORPORATE UNIT 1 TRIO HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE CRITIQUE ITEMS INTO CONTRACTOR TECHNICIAN TRAINING (UPGRADE TRAINING AND COMPLETE OJT) .

17) CONDUCT WEEKLY SENIOR MANAGEMENT SUPERINTENDENT ON-GOING INDUSTRIAL AND RADIOLOGICAL SAFETY REVIEWS. 8:00 AN MONDAY MORNING MEETING,

18) REVIEW AND UPGRADE RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH PHYSICS 3RD QTR 88 CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM.

19) INSTALL TEN WHOLE BODY. HEALTH PHYS I CS COMPLETE FRISKERS.

20) INSTALL THREE TOOL HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE CONTAMINATION MONITORS.

21) INSTALL AUTOMATED HYDRO NUCLEAR IEG 4TH QTR '88 TRASH SORTING EQUIPMENT.

22) REDES IGN AND RELOCATE UNIT 2 IEG 4TH QTR '88 CONTROL ZONE ACCESS.

23) IMPLEMENT UPGRADED CONTAMINATED MAINTENANCE COMPLETE HOSE CONTROL PROGRAM.

24) ASSIGN RESPONSIBILITY fOR HEAl TH PHYSICS COMPLETE VERIF I CATION OF ACCEPTABLE OPERATION OF HEPA UNITS.

STATUS/

ITEM RESPONSIBLE COMMITMENT GROUP DATE

25) IMPLEMENT A HOT PARTICLE PROGRAM HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE

26) ESTABLISH RESPIRATORY PROTECTION HEALTH PHYSICS . COMPLETE CRITERIA.

27) IMPLEMENT SPECIFIC CONTROL POINT HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE PROCEDURES FOR SELECTED 'AREAS.

28) COMPLETE REVIEW OF EXPIRED HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE HEALTH PHYSICS PROCEDURE A) REVIEW STATION PROGRAM FOR SUPERINTENDENT CONTROL OF PROCEDURE EXP I RATIONS 8 REVIEWS.

29) REEVALUATE HOW TO HANDLE HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE ALARA'RIEFINGS FOR PEOPLE NOT ATTENDING PRE- JOB BRIEFING.

l I HEALTH PHYSICS IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES JUNE 1988 STATUS o TRAIN NEW TECHNICIANS AND COMPLETE STAFFING HEALTH PHYSICIST POSITION o CONTINUE INITIATIVES TO RAISE WORK PRACTICE STANDARDS AND IMPROVE CONTAMINATION CONTROL WORK PRACTICES FACILITY ENHANCEMENTS TOOL MANAGEMENT o UPGRADE THE STATION'S RADWASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.

o UPGRADE THE INTERNAL DOSIMETRY PROGRAM.

o ENHANCE THE RWP SYSTEM.

o STUDY EXPANDING SCOPE OF REAL TIME AIR MONITORING

CHEMISTRY PROGRAM SALP EVALUATION IDENTIFIED STRENGTHS o EFFECTIVE WATER CHEMISTRY CONTROL PROGRAM.

o UPGRADED SAMPLING PROGRAM.

o TIMELY CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO DEVIATIONS OF CRITICAL VARIABLES.

o GOOD AGREEMENT WITH NRC: I MOBILE LABORATORY.

CHEMISTRY PROGRAM SALP EVALUATION IDENTIFIED WEAKNESSES o LABORATORY QA/QC PROGRAM.

o VENDOR PROGRAM CONTINUITY.

o SITE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY PROGRAM.

o MANAGEMENT ATTENTION TO WEAKNESSES

f Jl CHEMISTRY PROGRAM SALP EVALUATION o ACTIONS IN THESE AREAS HAVE NOW BEEN COMPLETED AND ARE CLOSED. (INSPECTION REPORT 50-387/88-05 AND 50-388/88-04) o BELIEVE OUR PROGRAMS ARE NOW IN PLACE AND FUNCTIONING.

o ENHANCEMENTS CONTINUE.

o RESULTS OF OUR PROGRAM CONTINUE TO IMPROVE.

STEAM CYCLE OUT01" .SPECIFICATIONHOURS legend I

En uNiT i I

l KB UtliT 2 I

I 1

I CY 10 C'0 0

5Cjn q 00 tD Eo n C 1 ai a n .r'n ni ei n I l> '<t JU 4I>

1985 1986 1987

AUXII.IAPYSYSTEMS OU'I' OF SPECIFICATION HOURS Le gran(3 C3 1.1I.IT 1 00

<O

~

O W

EEEI UNIT 2 r

tp r

d //

<<II.;;< I. <<Ltil.<<51<ii', <.: I.<<: .Ilier<<i<:I<

I I:<IH i ITI' << .'- T<< r<<<<.rli<<rli I: Irr II I I< IT<<1< O'I:I'< l.l<'.i.

rr r

r'. 00 00 r// r r

C'0 N r/

r r' O O O O r<g 'P P4 Kl ro M g m 0< (7)

/ /y(iOO o >

I I< "..<.I 3<< 4<i I <! i'-'I< i'I(I II< I li .Il<< Il 4<<

1985 1986 1987

thT I j.J.M N, K3 h gg~K

(.

CY.

TAT PlPT3 T .i T)f~o A T j.j V I WLb 3~4.lDMka AD%"

'ALWJLg II

.QC SAhIPLES I egend CZ t<VMBER C C SI>APPLES III '" C)lSAGREEMEPIT

/

r r

r

/

,Ji

/

L,O cl gn J>> 4>.> l I> '>> 3l> 4>> I (I ">> 3>> 'l>>

1985 1986 1987

CHEMISTRY INITIATIVES, o UPGRADE THE CHEMISTRY SPECIFICATION PROGRAM, CHEMISTRY MANUAL INPLACE FULLY IMPLEMENTED DEC 1989 o ENHANCE OUR CHEMISTRY MONITORING.

INLINE INSTRUMENTATION UPGRADE CHEMISTRY DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM o IMPLEMENT SELECTED CHEMISTRY SYSTEM ENHANCEMENTS.

ORGANIC TREATMENT METHODS REACTOR WATER CONDUCTIVITY FEEDWATER METALS o ENHANCE TRAINING OF TECHNICIANS.

UPGRADE CLASSROOM AND OJT EXTERNAL TRAINING UPGRADE CONTRACTOR PROGRAM o UPGRADE THE STATION WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.

MINIMIZE WASTE GENERATION o FOR 1989 THIS EFFORT WILL COST APPROXIMATELY 6 MAN YEARS AND I/2 MILLION DOLLARS.

DEVELOPMENT OF MAINTENANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM 1986 isa QUARTER EXTERNAL CONSULTANT ANALYSIS 1986 2ND QUARTER INTERNAL MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT 1986 2ND QUARTER INPO EVALUATION 1986 4TH QUARTER INTERNAL QUESTIONNAIRE 1986 NOVEMBER DEPT, MAINTENANCE SEMINAR 1987 JANUARY ISSUED MAINTENANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM 1987 JANUARY MEETING ON SALP REPORT 1987 APRIL 6-DAY MAINTENANCE WORKSHOP 1987 JUNE NUCLEAR SAFETY ASSESSMENT GROUP EVALUATION 1988 FEBRUARY PPRL SPONSORED MAINTENANCE SEMINAR 1988 FEBRUARY INPO EVALUATION 1988 MAY SALP EVALUATION

MAINTENANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM OBJECTIVES JUNE 1987 0 IMPROVE THE ORGANIZATION CLIMATE OF MAINTENANCE BY MEANS OF UPGRADING THE LEADERSHIP CAPABILITY OF MANAGERS/

SUPERVISORS AT ALL LEVELS.

0 CLEARLY DEFINE THE FUNCTIONAL SCOPE OF RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PLANT MAINTENANCE SECTION AND OTHER MAJOR INTERFACE GROUPS.

0 UPGRADE AND INTEGRATE THE ACTIVITIES OF THE MAINTENANCE SECTION PRODUCTION AND PLANNING GROUPS TO THE POINT OF MAXIMUM UTILITY AND EFFICIENCY.

0 IMPROVE THE ABILITY OF THE CRAFTSMAN THROUGH IMPROVED TRAINING TO MORE EFFECTIVELY AND EFFICIENTLY PERFORM PHYSICAL WORK IN THE FIELD.

0 DEVELOP INTEGRATED, FUNCTIONAL SHORT AND LONG TERM STATION WORK SCHEDULES.

0 DEVELOP THE ABILITY TO CAPTURE AND ADDRESS RECURRING MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS.

k 0 ESTAB ISH FEEDBACK PROGRAMS WHICH ENABLE INPUT FROM CRAFTSMEN TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE DECISION PROCESS.

MAINTENANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM PRESENT ASSESSMENT o MAINTENANCE PERFORMANCE CONTINUES AT LEVEL 1.

o INITIAL ENHANCEMENT INITIATIVES COMPLETE ORGANIZATIONAL AND STAFFING CHANGES VALVE PROGRAM HEAT EXCHANGER PROGRAM PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE TECHNIQUES RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE EPTAR EXPANDED UTILIZATION OF SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS o ADDITIONAL INITIATIVES IDENTIFIED REVIEW ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING AT NEXT LEVEL OF THE ORGANIZATION REVIEW INTERFACE AND CONTROL OF SUPPORT WORK.

FORCES CONTINUE PROGRAMS BEGUN LAST YEAR

li UNIT 2 2RIO PERSPECTIVES o CHALLENGING OUTAGE o UNIT IN EXCELLENT MATERIAL CONDITION o TWO MAJOR INCIDENTS RESIN DRAINDOWN STEAM SEPARATOR/F.W. NOZZLE o INCIDENTS ARE OF SERIOUS CONCERN MAJOR INVESTIGATION/CORRECTIVE ACTIONS UNDERWAY OUTAGE TASK FORCE ESTABLISHED/NEAR COMPLETION o THIS OUTAGE COMPARED TO PREVIOUS OUTAGES

OUTAGE EVE TS COMPARISON ESF INADVERTENT MATER REMI I VlTY OUTAGE AC IONS STARTS. IAMMER SPILLS HP EVENTS LOSS SDC U1 1RIO 12 U1 2RIO 02 1RIO U1 3RIO U2 2RIO

UNIT 2 2RIO TASK FORCE OBJECTIVE THROUGH PARTICIPATION OF WORKING LEVEL MEMBERS OF PLANT STAFF DEVELOP RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPROVE THE OPERATION AND SAFETY OF SSES, o REVIEW SELECTED INCIDENTS DURING THE UNIT 2 2 RIO AND DETERMINE ROOT CAUSE(S).

o REVIEW ROOT CAUSE(S) FOR COMMONALITY OR GENERIC IMPL I CAT IONS.

PLANT DESIGN PROGRAMS, PROCEDURES PEOPLE, TRAINING o DEVELOP RECOMMENDATIONS.

UNIT 2 RIO INCIDENT PREVENTION IMPROVEMENTS PLANT PROGRAMS DESIGN OPERATION PROCEDURES AND MAINTENANCE PROTECTION IN DEPTH TRAINING PEOPLE

ROOT CAUSE ROOT CAUSE: THE MOST BASIC REASON(S) FOR AN EFFECT, WHICH IF CORRECTEDi WILL PREVENT RECURRENCE ROOT CAUSE CRITERIA:

~ A SOLUTION THAT PREVENTS RECURRENCE

~ A SOLUTION THAT IS WITHIN OUR CONTROL A SOLUTION THAT Al LOWS US TO MEET OUR OTHER OBJECTIVES FINDING ROOT CAUSE:

1. DEFINE THE PRIMARY EFFECT, THE EFFECT/PROBLEM THAT

~

YOU ARE TRYING TO PREVENT FROM RECURRING.

2, DETERNINE THE CAUSE OF THE EFFECT. BE ABLE TO BACK UP ANY CAUSE WITH FACT, 3.. CATEGORIZE ROOT CAUSES:

A. Pl NIT DESIGN/EQUIPMENT B. PROGRAMS/PROCEDURES C. TRAINING/PEOPLE

0. DETENIlK A SOLUTION THAT MEETS THE ROOT CAUSE CRITERIA.

l UNIT 2 2RI 0 TASK FORCE I&C SUPERVISOR LEADER SR. ENGINEER QC SR. ENGINEER OPERATIONS ASST. FOREMAN I&C SR. ENGINEER NSAG UNIT SUPERVISOR UNIT COORDINATOR ASST. FOREMAN MAINTENANCE CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR SR. HEALTH PHYSICIST SR. COMPLIANCE ENGINEER MAINTENANCE PLANNING & SCHEDULING SUPERVISOR

C UNIT 2 2RIO TASK FORCE PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS o ELECTRICAL PANELS o REFUELING FLOOR ACTIVITIES o INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTABILITY o PROCEDURAL ADHERENCE TASK FORCE COMPLETION JULY 51st OUTAGE CRITIQUE AUGUST 15TH REVIEW MEETING SEPTEMBER

~ Plant Operations (technical, system engineer)

~ Chemistry and Rad Controls (chemistry}

~ Survei lance (IS I) 1

~ Refueling &. Outage Mgmt (system engineers, fire protection, fuel design}

~ Licensing (emergency response capability, design)

~ Engineering Support (design, risk assessment, seismic qual, environmental qual, resources, industry events analysis)

~ Environmental Qualification (EQ)

~ Seismic Qualification (SQRT)

~ Piping and Support Analysis

~ Chemistry and Materials

~ ISI

~ Fire Protection

~ Risk Asse'ssment (PRA, IPE)

~ Life Extension

~ Part Engineering

~ Conf iguration Management

I

1

~ 1980-81 Contractors prepared EQ binders

~ 1982 NRC Audit

~ 1985 Construction phase done

~ 1984 EQ handled by design disciplines

~ 1985 PL management self-assessment

~ 1986 Dedication of individual to EQ Binder upgrade initiated Department program established NRC inspection and audit

~ 1987 EQ staff created

'J

~ Initiated preparation of Design Basis Doc's

~ Completed external reviews of Appendix R

~ Completed external reviews of Configuration Management

~ Conducted an is-built pilot program

~ Conducting an SSFI using outside people this summer

~ Basic Elements

~ Documentation Completeness Aud i tab i 1ity Usefulness Specialists General Training

~ Updating"

~ Assessments Internal External Regulatory

NUCLEAR DEPARTMENT PLANNING PROCESS BASIC ELEMENTS NRC INPuT SPECIFIC EXAMPLES

MANAGING FOR EXCELLENCE VISION OF EXCELLENCE PLANS/PROCESSES FOR ACCOMPLISHING WORK

\

DEPARTMENT PLANNING SESSIONS PERFORMANCE MONITORING

J VISION OF EXCELLENCE NUCLEAR COMPANY AND INDUSTRY DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES NUCLEAR DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL DEVELOPMENT INFLUENCES OF FIVE'YEAR GOALS AND NEAR-TERM STRATEGIC PLAN OP ERAT I NG CONSTRAINTS DEVELOPMENT OF NEAR-TERM PERFORMANCE VISION OBJECTIVES OF EXCELLENCE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE

. OBJECTIVES INITIATIVES

PERFORMANCE AREAS OPERATIONAL PERSONNEL NUCLEAR SAFETY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT COST

PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT PRODUCT/SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS HEALTH PHYSICS PRACTICES PERSONNEL SAFETY,

1988 1992 STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL ll - RADIATION EXPOSURE ENSURE THAT STATION RAD I ATION EXPOSURE IS LESS THAN 592 MAN-REM PER UNIT CYCLE IN 1992,

1,

~ ~

COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE 1200 BWR AVERAGE 1200

)003 Legend 1000 K3 INDUSTRY 1000 KH SUSQUEHANNA

.784 BOO BOO l

CL 622 F E e aoo- d00 523 lK I I C

400 400 311 200 200 41 0

1983 1985 1986 1987 Year

ll

% ~

~

1988 EXPECTED EXPOSURE At the beginning of each year, the Nuclear Oepartment establishes an estimate of the radiation exposure expected to be accrued as a result of the operation of the Susquehanna units. This exposure estimate is based upon expected work and includes the benefits of implemented ALARA actions and practices.

Exposure goals are then established which additionally incorporate planned.

ALARA actions and a 10% challenge factor which is applied to selected work.

For 1988 the goal is 538 man-rem and the estimate is 614 man-rem. Actual performance below the estimate implies that ALARA .performance is improving; .

performance below the goal means we are meeting department objectives. Also indicated is INPO accumulated data for Annual Exposure received by other BWR's through 12/87. All data is based on thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) data.

Because TLDs are processed at the end of each month, actual data will lag the calendar month by one month.

1400 1400 1200. INPO MEOIAN 1200 1000. 1000 0S I II I 1 I 1 P 0 0S S 0S11>>S00 I I 0 I 0 > 0 l1 I0 P S O 000001 Q INPO BEST QUARTILE I

I C 800. ESTIMATE -8OO 0 ~ I ~ OSI ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ I ~ 0 ~ I ~ a 198S DEPT. GOAL Q 4)

ACTUAL ~ yO -600 O 600 ~ yy>

~ gal D ggO ~ g00 ipse+ ~ E E

~

CD 400. 'r "r ~

~

8+~

400 D

200 .200

'85 '86 '87 J f al A Il J J A 5 0 M D 1988 This Month:

The accumulated dose at Susquehanna for the month of April was 174 man-rem commensurate with the scope of outage work in progress.

5-1

1989 1995 STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL ll - HEALTH PHYSICS PRACTICES ACHIEVE AND NAINTAIN HEALTH PHYSICS PERFORNANCE WHICH PLACES SSES WITHIN THE FOREFRONT OF THE INDUSTRY, QUANTITATIVELY STATEDi f

O ATTAIN AN ANNUAL STATION RADIATION EXPOSURE> MEASURED AS A THREE-YEAR ROLLING AVERAGE> LESS THAN 672 MAN"REM,

THREE (3) YEAR ROLLING AVERAGE STATION RADIATION EXPOSURE ACTUAL GOAL 1985/1986/1987 852 MAN-REN 1986/1987/1988 662 MAN-REM" 1991/1992/1993 672 MAN-REM

" BASED ON 1988 EXPOSURE MEETING GOAL OF 538 MAN-REM

VISION OF EXCELLENCE NUCLEAR COMPANY AND INDUSTRY DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES NUCLEAR DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL DEVEI OPMENT INFLUENCES OF F!VE YEAR GOALS AND NEAR-TERN STRATEG I C PLAN OPERATING CONSTRAINTS DEVELOPMENT OF NEAR-TERN PERFORMANCE VISION OB JECTIVES OF EXCELLENCE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES INITIATIVES

GOAL 11: HEALTH PHYSICS PRACTICES GOAL STATENENT ENHANCENENTS; 0 ATTAIN A PERSONNEL CONTAMINATION RATE OF LESS THAN 20 CONTAMINATIONS PER 10i000 RWP ENTRIES.

0 MAINTAIN THE TOTAL CONTAMINATED AREA LESS THAN 7 SQUARE FEET s 0 LIMIT THE NUMBER OF RADIOLOGICAL OCCURRENCE REPORTS TO ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, 0 LIMIT THE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS RECEIVING GREATER THAN 2000 MREM TO 5 PER YEARs, 0 NAINTAIN ALL INTERNAL EXPOSURES LESS THAN 2X NPBB,

AGE DISTRIB 'N OF CORRECTIVE ACTI N ITEMS VS: EQD OF 1987 GOAL DATA AS OF 12-10-87 800- =769 T

GOAL REPRESEN1S THE FOLLOWING 700- REDUCTIONS FROM 6-8-87 TOTALS:

1982 100%o 1983 90%

1984 S07o 600- 1985 70%

1986 60%

V) T =491 500- "-

I 50 T= 424 4

4oo- "- T = 370 bJ 97 T 331 CD 37 T=301 300- .-. T =279 Z 29 26 T =232 491 83 80 T =206 200- """ 72 ~p T =168 25 58 ISSUE. YLAf<

.")1 29 I::.1 I')82 0 228 I. ) I')H 'i 100 V4 I

'I 19)34 M5 1m i:-, P() ~

I: 1 IO)3'i ."i)

I') c) I Ir'r)

PI 2.2.5 AGE OI STRIBUTION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION ITEMS The pepartment has established a number of administrative programs which serve to identify deficiencies in need of corrective action. To ensure timely resolution and to counter tendencies towards growth in the backlog, management attention is focused on the age distribution of these corrective action items.

Shown below is the total number of Nonconformance Reports, Significant Operating Occurrence Reports, NRC i tems and NgA Audit Findings (issued against Plant Staff) that remain open, broken down by year of issuance. Management's objective is to reduce the total number of items from 961 at the beginning of the year to 189 by the end of 1988. This goal represents closure of lpp% of the 1983 items, 90% of the 1984 items, and 80% of the items from 1985-1987.

Ch II 1000 I

900- ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~

• t ~ ~ ~ ~

GOAL REPRESENTS THE FOLLOWING 800 ~ J ~

REDUCTIONS FROM 1-1-88 TOTALS:

100 II ':"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

1983 IOOX o II 1984 -'0%

$ 00 'L

~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t~~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '4 ~ ~ ~ ~

1985 BOA I 1986 BOT soo ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

1987 807 400 O C7l

~

g) 300 ~ ~

It ISSUE YEAR 200 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ K3 1983 lZ3 1984 IOO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

K5 1985 jC3 1986 EZI 1987 D J F M A M J J A 5 0 N Q GOA L 1988 This Month: Thirty-two items were closed during May,. whil'e the ma jority of station resources were devoted to resolution of incidnets and evolutions arising from the Unit 2 refueling outage.

VISION PF EXCELLENCE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY COMPANY AND PERFORMANCE DEPARTMENT OBJECTIVES NUCLEAR DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL DEVELOPMENT INFLUENCES OF FIVE YEAR GOALS AND NEAR-TERN STRATEGIC PLAN OPERATING CONSTRAINTS DEVElOPMENT OF NEAR-TERM'ERFORMANCE V.IS ION OBJECTIVES OF EXCELLENCE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE

'BJECTIVES INITIATIVES

THE WORK AND PLANNING CYCLE 1986 1987 1988 1989 UNIT 'ot. UNIT 2 1sT UNIT 1 3RD UNIT 2 2ND UNIT 1 4TH UNIT 2 3RD OUTAGE CRITIQUE OUTAGE CRITIQU TASK FORCE PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING CONFERENCE CONFERENCE CONfERENCE CONFERENCE SALP REPORT SALP REPORT INPO REPO T INPO REPORT E IN IT I AT IVES AND NEW INITIATIVES AND

c