IR 05000155/2006002: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:November 2, 2006Mr. Kurt M. HaasGeneral Manager Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant Consumers Energy Company 10269 U.S. 31 North Charlevoix, MI 49720SUBJECT:BIG ROCK POINT INSPECTION REPORTS 050-00155/06-02(DNMS) AND072-00043/06-01(DNMS)
{{#Wiki_filter:ber 2, 2006
 
==SUBJECT:==
BIG ROCK POINT INSPECTION REPORTS 050-00155/06-02(DNMS) AND 072-00043/06-01(DNMS)


==Dear Mr. Haas:==
==Dear Mr. Haas:==
On October 18, 2006, the NRC completed inspection activities at the Big Rock PointRestoration Project. The purpose of the inspection was to conduct radiological confirmatory surveys and evaluate the biennial exercise of the Emergency Plan. At the conclusion of on-siteinspection on October 18, the inspectors discussed the inspection findings with you and members of your staff. This inspection consisted of independent radiological confirmatory surveys of areas of the BigRock Point site that had not been previously surveyed by the NRC, and the observation and evaluation of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Emergency Plan exercise. Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection included a selective examination of procedures and representative records, observations of activities in progress, and interviews with personnel.Based on the results of this inspection, the NRC did not identify any violations.
On October 18, 2006, the NRC completed inspection activities at the Big Rock Point Restoration Project. The purpose of the inspection was to conduct radiological confirmatory surveys and evaluate the biennial exercise of the Emergency Plan. At the conclusion of on-site inspection on October 18, the inspectors discussed the inspection findings with you and members of your staff.


In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letterand its enclosure will be available electronically in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). The NRC's document system is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
This inspection consisted of independent radiological confirmatory surveys of areas of the Big Rock Point site that had not been previously surveyed by the NRC, and the observation and evaluation of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Emergency Plan exercise. Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection included a selective examination of procedures and representative records, observations of activities in progress, and interviews with personnel.


K. Haas-2-We will gladly discuss any questions you may have regarding this inspection.
Based on the results of this inspection, the NRC did not identify any violations.
 
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). The NRCs document system is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. We will gladly discuss any questions you may have regarding this inspection.


Sincerely,
Sincerely,
/RA/Jamnes L. Cameron, ChiefDecommissioning BranchDocket Nos. 050-00155; 072-00043License No. DPR-6
/RA/
Jamnes L. Cameron, Chief Decommissioning Branch Docket Nos. 050-00155; 072-00043 License No. DPR-6


===Enclosures:===
===Enclosures:===
Inspection Reports 050-00155/06-02(DNMS); 072-00043/06-01(DNMS)
Inspection Reports 050-00155/06-02(DNMS); 072-00043/06-01(DNMS)


REGION IIIDocket Nos.:050-00155; 072-00043License No.:DPR-6 Report Nos.:050-00155/06-02(DNMS);072-00043/06-01(DNMS)Licensee:Consumers Energy Company Facility:Big Rock Point Restoration Project Location:10269 U.S. 31 NorthCharlevoix, MI 49720Dates:October 16 through 18, 2006 Inspectors:William G. Snell, Senior Health PhysicistSam J. Mulay, Health PhysicistApproved by:Jamnes L. Cameron, ChiefDecommissioning Branch, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety 2EnclosureEXECUTIVE SUMMARYConsumers Energy CompanyBig Rock Point Restoration ProjectNRC Inspection Reports 050-00155/06-02(DNMS) and 072-00043/06-01(DNMS)This routine decommissioning inspection involved confirmatory radiological surveys andobservation of a biennial exercise of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)
REGION III==
Emergency Plan.Operation of an ISFSI*The licensee adequately demonstrated the effectiveness of the ISFSI Emergency Planand their ability to implement the Plan in response to an emergency. (Section 1.0)Inspection of Final Surveys*A review of licensee survey records and independent confirmatory surveys for residualradioactive contamination confirmed that the licensee is performing remediation and final status surveys consistent with the License Termination Plan. (Section 2.0)
Docket Nos.: 050-00155; 072-00043 License No.: DPR-6 Report Nos.: 050-00155/06-02(DNMS);
1A list of acronyms used in the report is included at the end of the Report Details.
072-00043/06-01(DNMS)
Licensee: Consumers Energy Company Facility: Big Rock Point Restoration Project Location: 10269 U.S. 31 North Charlevoix, MI 49720 Dates: October 16 through 18, 2006 Inspectors: William G. Snell, Senior Health Physicist Sam J. Mulay, Health Physicist Approved by: Jamnes L. Cameron, Chief Decommissioning Branch, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Enclosure
 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Consumers Energy Company Big Rock Point Restoration Project NRC Inspection Reports 050-00155/06-02(DNMS) and 072-00043/06-01(DNMS)
This routine decommissioning inspection involved confirmatory radiological surveys and observation of a biennial exercise of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)
Emergency Plan.
 
Operation of an ISFSI
* The licensee adequately demonstrated the effectiveness of the ISFSI Emergency Plan and their ability to implement the Plan in response to an emergency. (Section 1.0)
Inspection of Final Surveys
* A review of licensee survey records and independent confirmatory surveys for residual radioactive contamination confirmed that the licensee is performing remediation and final status surveys consistent with the License Termination Plan. (Section 2.0)
2  Enclosure
 
Report Details1 1.0 Operation of an ISFSI (60855)
1.1 Inspection Scope The inspectors observed and evaluated the conduct of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Emergency Plan biennial exercise.
 
1.2 Observations and Findings Section 12.2.2 of Volume 35 of the ISFSI Emergency Plan requires the licensee to perform a biennial exercise to demonstrate emergency response capabilities and the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan. On October 17, 2006, the licensee conducted a biennial exercise based on a simulated earthquake that caused a spent fuel storage cask to tip over. In response to the event, the license appropriately implemented the Emergency Plan, correctly classified the event, augmented personnel as necessary, made timely notifications, conducted appropriate radiological monitoring, and ensured the safety of site personnel.
 
1.3 Conclusion The licensee adequately demonstrated the effectiveness of the ISFSI Emergency Plan and their ability to implement the Plan in response to an emergency.
 
2.0 Inspection of Final Surveys (83801)
2.1 Inspection Scope The inspectors performed independent radiological confirmatory surveys of selected on-site areas. Licensee records of final status surveys were also reviewed.
 
2.2 Observations and Findings Independent radiological gamma scan surveys were performed of the following survey areas using sodium iodide (NaI) scintillation detectors coupled to ratemeters with audible indication: South11C11 (50% scanned); 20C11 (80% scanned); South19C12 (30% scanned); North21C12 (50% scanned); eastern 20% of East22C12 (50% scanned);
and an area of about 50 square meters in the northeast corner of 18C13 (50% scanned).
 
In all areas surveyed, the inspectors did not identify elevated levels of direct gamma radiation in excess of background.
 
A list of acronyms used in the report is included at the end of the Report Details.
 
3  Enclosure
 
The following nine licensee final status survey records were reviewed, which included the Survey Area Requirements, Data Quality Objects, and the Final Status Survey (FSS)
Design:
Class 2 FSS Release Record, North21C12, Northeast Transport Route Class 1 FSS Release Record, 20C11, East Radwaste Staging Area Class 1 FSS Release Record, North11C11, North Radwaste Staging Area Class 1 FSS Release Record, South11C11, South Radwaste Staging Area Class 2 FSS Release Record, North19C12, Northwest Transport Route Class 2 FSS Release Record, South21C12, Southeast Transport Route Class 2 FSS Release Record, South19C12, Southwest Transport Route Class 2 FSS Release Record, West22C12, West Powerline Corridor Class 2 FSS Release Record, 15(1)C12, Eastern Section Woods Road Area The Survey Area Requirements, Data Quality Objects, and the Final Status Survey (FSS) Designs were adequate. For the above South Radwaste Staging Area (South11C11), and Southwest Transport Route (South19C12), the licensees survey scan results and the analytical results of soil samples were also reviewed. The final status survey soil sample results reviewed showed less than the derived concentration guideline levels (DCGLs) for soil of 11.93 picocuries per gram (pCi/g) for cesium-137 and 3.21 pCi/g for cobalt-60 as described in the licensees License Termination Plan (LTP). The licensees scan surveys indicated no elevated direct gamma radiation in excess of background 2.3 Conclusion A review of licensee survey records and independent confirmatory surveys for residual radioactive contamination confirmed that the licensee is performing remediation and final status surveys consistent with the LTP.
 
3.0 Exit Meeting Summary The inspectors presented preliminary inspection findings to members of the licensee management team at the conclusion of onsite inspection activities on October 18, 2006.
 
ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 4  Enclosure
 
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED Consumers Energy Company
* Kurt Haas, Site General Manager
* Ken Pallagi, Radiation Protection & Environmental Services Manager
* Persons present at the exit meetings.
 
INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED IP 60855 Operation of an ISFSI IP 83801 Inspection of Final Surveys at Permanently Shutdown Reactors ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED Opened  None Closed  None Discussed  None PARTIAL LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED Licensee documents reviewed and utilized during the course of this inspection are specifically identified in the Report Details above.


3EnclosureReport Details 11.0Operation of an ISFSI (60855)1.1Inspection ScopeThe inspectors observed and evaluated the conduct of the Independent Spent FuelStorage Installation (ISFSI) Emergency Plan biennial exercise.1.2Observations and FindingsSection 12.2.2 of Volume 35 of the ISFSI Emergency Plan requires the licensee toperform a biennial exercise to demonstrate emergency response capabilities and the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan. On October 17, 2006, the licensee conducted a biennial exercise based on a simulated earthquake that caused a spent fuel storage cask to tip over. In response to the event, the license appropriately implemented the Emergency Plan, correctly classified the event, augmented personnel as necessary, made timely notifications, conducted appropriate radiological monitoring, and ensured the safety of site personnel.1.3ConclusionThe licensee adequately demonstrated the effectiveness of the ISFSI Emergency Planand their ability to implement the Plan in response to an emergency.2.0Inspection of Final Surveys (83801)2.1Inspection ScopeThe inspectors performed independent radiological confirmatory surveys of selected on-site areas. Licensee records of final status surveys were also reviewed. 2.2Observations and FindingsIndependent radiological gamma scan surveys were performed of the following surveyareas using sodium iodide (NaI) scintillation detectors coupled to ratemeters with audible indication: South11C 11 (50% scanned); 20C 11 (80% scanned); South19C 1 2(30% scanned); North21C 12 (50% scanned); eastern 20% of East22C 12 (50% scanned);and an area of about 50 square meters in the northeast corner of 18C 13 (50% scanned). In all areas surveyed, the inspectors did not identify elevated levels of direct gamma radiation in excess of background.
LIST OF ACRONYMS USED ADAMS Agencywide Documents Access and Management System DCGL Derived Concentration Guideline Level DNMS Division of Nuclear Materials Safety FSS Final Status Survey ISFSI Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation LTP License Termination Plan NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission pCi/g picocuries per gram Attachment


4EnclosureThe following nine licensee final status survey records were reviewed, which includedthe Survey Area Requirements, Data Quality Objects, and the Final Status Survey (FSS)
6 Attachment
Design:Class 2 FSS Release Record, North21C 12, Northeast Transport Route Class 1 FSS Release Record, 20C 11, East Radwaste Staging AreaClass 1 FSS Release Record, North11C 11, North Radwaste Staging AreaClass 1 FSS Release Record, South11C 11, South Radwaste Staging AreaClass 2 FSS Release Record, North19C 12, Northwest Transport Route Class 2 FSS Release Record, South21C 12, Southeast Transport Route Class 2 FSS Release Record, South19C 12, Southwest Transport Route Class 2 FSS Release Record, West22C 12, West Powerline Corridor Class 2 FSS Release Record, 15(1)C 12, Eastern Section Woods Road Area The Survey Area Requirements, Data Quality Objects, and the Final Status Survey(FSS) Designs were adequate. For the above South Radwaste Staging Area (South11C 11), and Southwest Transport Route (South19C 12), the licensee's surveyscan results and the analytical results of soil samples were also reviewed. The final status survey soil sample results reviewed showed less than the derived concentration guideline levels (DCGLs) for soil of 11.93 picocuries per gram (pCi/g) for cesium-137 and 3.21 pCi/g for cobalt-60 as described in the licensee's License Termination Plan (LTP). The licensee's scan surveys indicated no elevated direct gamma radiation in excess of background2.3ConclusionA review of licensee survey records and independent confirmatory surveys for residualradioactive contamination confirmed that the licensee is performing remediation and final status surveys consistent with the LTP.3.0Exit Meeting SummaryThe inspectors presented preliminary inspection findings to members of the licenseemanagement team at the conclusion of onsite inspection activities on October 18, 2006.ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION AttachmentSUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATIONPARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTEDConsumers Energy Company* Kurt Haas, Site General Manager* Ken Pallagi, Radiation Protection & Environmental Services Manager* Persons present at the exit meetings.INSPECTION PROCEDURES USEDIP 60855Operation of an ISFSIIP 83801Inspection of Final Surveys at Permanently Shutdown ReactorsITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSEDOpened None Closed None Discussed NonePARTIAL LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWEDLicensee documents reviewed and utilized during the course of this inspection are specificallyidentified in the "Report Details" above.LIST OF ACRONYMS USEDADAMSAgencywide Documents Access and Management SystemDCGL Derived Concentration Guideline Level DNMSDivision of Nuclear Materials Safety FSSFinal Status Survey ISFSIIndependent Spent Fuel Storage Installation LTPLicense Termination Plan NRCNuclear Regulatory Commission pCi/g picocuries per gram Attachment 6
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 12:26, 23 November 2019

IR 05000155-06-002 (DNMS) and 07200043-06-001 (Dnms), on 10/18/06, Big Rock Point, Confirmatory Radiological Surveys and Observation of a Biennial Exercise of ISFSI Emergency Plan
ML063070200
Person / Time
Site: Big Rock Point  File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/02/2006
From: Jamnes Cameron
NRC/RGN-III/DNMS/DB
To: Haas K
Consumers Energy
References
IR-06-001, IR-06-002
Download: ML063070200 (8)


Text

ber 2, 2006

SUBJECT:

BIG ROCK POINT INSPECTION REPORTS 050-00155/06-02(DNMS) AND 072-00043/06-01(DNMS)

Dear Mr. Haas:

On October 18, 2006, the NRC completed inspection activities at the Big Rock Point Restoration Project. The purpose of the inspection was to conduct radiological confirmatory surveys and evaluate the biennial exercise of the Emergency Plan. At the conclusion of on-site inspection on October 18, the inspectors discussed the inspection findings with you and members of your staff.

This inspection consisted of independent radiological confirmatory surveys of areas of the Big Rock Point site that had not been previously surveyed by the NRC, and the observation and evaluation of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Emergency Plan exercise. Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection included a selective examination of procedures and representative records, observations of activities in progress, and interviews with personnel.

Based on the results of this inspection, the NRC did not identify any violations.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). The NRCs document system is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. We will gladly discuss any questions you may have regarding this inspection.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Jamnes L. Cameron, Chief Decommissioning Branch Docket Nos. 050-00155; 072-00043 License No. DPR-6

Enclosures:

Inspection Reports 050-00155/06-02(DNMS); 072-00043/06-01(DNMS)

REGION III==

Docket Nos.: 050-00155; 072-00043 License No.: DPR-6 Report Nos.: 050-00155/06-02(DNMS);

072-00043/06-01(DNMS)

Licensee: Consumers Energy Company Facility: Big Rock Point Restoration Project Location: 10269 U.S. 31 North Charlevoix, MI 49720 Dates: October 16 through 18, 2006 Inspectors: William G. Snell, Senior Health Physicist Sam J. Mulay, Health Physicist Approved by: Jamnes L. Cameron, Chief Decommissioning Branch, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Enclosure

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Consumers Energy Company Big Rock Point Restoration Project NRC Inspection Reports 050-00155/06-02(DNMS) and 072-00043/06-01(DNMS)

This routine decommissioning inspection involved confirmatory radiological surveys and observation of a biennial exercise of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)

Emergency Plan.

Operation of an ISFSI

  • The licensee adequately demonstrated the effectiveness of the ISFSI Emergency Plan and their ability to implement the Plan in response to an emergency. (Section 1.0)

Inspection of Final Surveys

  • A review of licensee survey records and independent confirmatory surveys for residual radioactive contamination confirmed that the licensee is performing remediation and final status surveys consistent with the License Termination Plan. (Section 2.0)

2 Enclosure

Report Details1 1.0 Operation of an ISFSI (60855)

1.1 Inspection Scope The inspectors observed and evaluated the conduct of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Emergency Plan biennial exercise.

1.2 Observations and Findings Section 12.2.2 of Volume 35 of the ISFSI Emergency Plan requires the licensee to perform a biennial exercise to demonstrate emergency response capabilities and the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan. On October 17, 2006, the licensee conducted a biennial exercise based on a simulated earthquake that caused a spent fuel storage cask to tip over. In response to the event, the license appropriately implemented the Emergency Plan, correctly classified the event, augmented personnel as necessary, made timely notifications, conducted appropriate radiological monitoring, and ensured the safety of site personnel.

1.3 Conclusion The licensee adequately demonstrated the effectiveness of the ISFSI Emergency Plan and their ability to implement the Plan in response to an emergency.

2.0 Inspection of Final Surveys (83801)

2.1 Inspection Scope The inspectors performed independent radiological confirmatory surveys of selected on-site areas. Licensee records of final status surveys were also reviewed.

2.2 Observations and Findings Independent radiological gamma scan surveys were performed of the following survey areas using sodium iodide (NaI) scintillation detectors coupled to ratemeters with audible indication: South11C11 (50% scanned); 20C11 (80% scanned); South19C12 (30% scanned); North21C12 (50% scanned); eastern 20% of East22C12 (50% scanned);

and an area of about 50 square meters in the northeast corner of 18C13 (50% scanned).

In all areas surveyed, the inspectors did not identify elevated levels of direct gamma radiation in excess of background.

A list of acronyms used in the report is included at the end of the Report Details.

3 Enclosure

The following nine licensee final status survey records were reviewed, which included the Survey Area Requirements, Data Quality Objects, and the Final Status Survey (FSS)

Design:

Class 2 FSS Release Record, North21C12, Northeast Transport Route Class 1 FSS Release Record, 20C11, East Radwaste Staging Area Class 1 FSS Release Record, North11C11, North Radwaste Staging Area Class 1 FSS Release Record, South11C11, South Radwaste Staging Area Class 2 FSS Release Record, North19C12, Northwest Transport Route Class 2 FSS Release Record, South21C12, Southeast Transport Route Class 2 FSS Release Record, South19C12, Southwest Transport Route Class 2 FSS Release Record, West22C12, West Powerline Corridor Class 2 FSS Release Record, 15(1)C12, Eastern Section Woods Road Area The Survey Area Requirements, Data Quality Objects, and the Final Status Survey (FSS) Designs were adequate. For the above South Radwaste Staging Area (South11C11), and Southwest Transport Route (South19C12), the licensees survey scan results and the analytical results of soil samples were also reviewed. The final status survey soil sample results reviewed showed less than the derived concentration guideline levels (DCGLs) for soil of 11.93 picocuries per gram (pCi/g) for cesium-137 and 3.21 pCi/g for cobalt-60 as described in the licensees License Termination Plan (LTP). The licensees scan surveys indicated no elevated direct gamma radiation in excess of background 2.3 Conclusion A review of licensee survey records and independent confirmatory surveys for residual radioactive contamination confirmed that the licensee is performing remediation and final status surveys consistent with the LTP.

3.0 Exit Meeting Summary The inspectors presented preliminary inspection findings to members of the licensee management team at the conclusion of onsite inspection activities on October 18, 2006.

ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 4 Enclosure

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED Consumers Energy Company

  • Kurt Haas, Site General Manager
  • Ken Pallagi, Radiation Protection & Environmental Services Manager
  • Persons present at the exit meetings.

INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED IP 60855 Operation of an ISFSI IP 83801 Inspection of Final Surveys at Permanently Shutdown Reactors ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED Opened None Closed None Discussed None PARTIAL LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED Licensee documents reviewed and utilized during the course of this inspection are specifically identified in the Report Details above.

LIST OF ACRONYMS USED ADAMS Agencywide Documents Access and Management System DCGL Derived Concentration Guideline Level DNMS Division of Nuclear Materials Safety FSS Final Status Survey ISFSI Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation LTP License Termination Plan NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission pCi/g picocuries per gram Attachment

6 Attachment