IR 05000382/2006006: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams|number = ML063120256}}
{{Adams
| number = ML063120256
| issue date = 07/19/2006
| title = IR 05000382 06-006; on 06/19 - 22/2006; Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3, Security Baseline Inspection; Equipment, Performance, Testing and Maintenance - Letter Only
| author name = Shannon M
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRS/PSB
| addressee name = Venable J
| addressee affiliation = Entergy Operations, Inc
| docket = 05000382
| license number = NPF-038
| contact person =
| document report number = IR-06-006
| document type = Inspection Report Correspondence, Letter
| page count = 3
}}


{{IR-Nav| site = 05000382 | year = 2006 | report number = 006 }}
{{IR-Nav| site = 05000382 | year = 2006 | report number = 006 }}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:uly 19, 2006
[[Issue date::July 19, 2006]]


JosephVice President Operations Waterford 3 Entergy Operations, Inc.
==SUBJECT:==
WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNIT 3 - NRC SECURITY INSPECTION REPORT 05000382/2006006


17265 River Road Killona, LA  70066-0751
==Dear Mr. Venable:==
On June 22, 2006, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security baseline inspection at your Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 facility. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results which were discussed on June 22, 2006, with you, and other members of your staff.


SUBJECT: WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNIT 3 - NRC SECURITYINSPECTION REPORT 05000382/2006006
This inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.


==Dear Mr. Venable:==
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
On June 22, 2006, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a securitybaseline inspection at your Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 facility. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRC's ReactorOversight Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results which were discussed on June 22, 2006, with you, and other members of your staff.This inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security andcompliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.


The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.This report documents one finding of very low safety significance (i.e., Green as determined bythe Physical Protection Significance Determination Process). The deficiency was promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors left the site.NRC is treating this violation as a non-cited violation (NCV) consistent with Section VI.A.1 of theNRC Enforcement Policy because of the very low safety significance of the violation and because it is entered into your corrective action program. If you contest this non-cited violation, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of the inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear regulatory Commission, ATTN.: Document Control Desk, Washington D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator Region IV; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Waterford Steam ElectricStation, Unit 3 facility.
This report documents one finding of very low safety significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process). The deficiency was promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors left the site.


Entergy Operations, Inc.-2    In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will beavailable electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's document system, ADAMS. ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (ThePublic Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letter's enclosure will not be available for public inspection.In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements foryour response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made availableelectronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's document system ADAMS. If Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptableresponse, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, markyour entire response Security Related Information - Withhold under 10 CFR 2.390" and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1).
NRC is treating this violation as a non-cited violation (NCV) consistent with Section VI.A.1 of the NRC Enforcement Policy because of the very low safety significance of the violation and because it is entered into your corrective action program. If you contest this non-cited violation, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of the inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear regulatory Commission, ATTN.: Document Control Desk, Washington D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator Region IV; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 facility. Entergy Operations, Inc.  -2-In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRCs document system, ADAMS.


Sincerely,/RA/
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (The Public Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letters enclosure will not be available for public inspection.
Michael P. Shannon, ChiefPlant Support Branch Division of Reactor SafetyDocket:  50-382License: NPF-38Nonpublic


===Enclosure:===
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs document system ADAMS. If Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, mark your entire response Security Related Information - Withhold under 10 CFR 2.390 and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1).
Inspection Report 05000382/2006006             


===w/attachment:===
Sincerely,
Supplemental Information cc w/enclosure:Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Entergy Operations, Inc.
/RA/
Michael P. Shannon, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket: 50-382 License: NPF-38 Nonpublic Enclosure: Inspection Report 05000382/2006006 w/attachment: Supplemental Information cc w/enclosure:
Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Entergy Operations, Inc.


P.O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995Vice President, Operations SupportEntergy Operations, Inc.
P.O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 Vice President, Operations Support Entergy Operations, Inc.


P.O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 Entergy Operations, Inc.-3   General Manager, Plant OperationsWaterford 3 SES Entergy Operations, Inc.
P.O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 Entergy Operations, Inc. -3-General Manager, Plant Operations Waterford 3 SES Entergy Operations, Inc.


17265 River Road Killona, LA 70066-0751Manager - Licensing ManagerWaterford 3 SES Entergy Operations, Inc.
17265 River Road Killona, LA 70066-0751 Manager - Licensing Manager Waterford 3 SES Entergy Operations, Inc.


17265 River Road Killona, LA 70066-0751Director, Nuclear Safety &   Regulatory Affairs Waterford 3 SES Entergy Operations, Inc.
17265 River Road Killona, LA 70066-0751 Director, Nuclear Safety &
Regulatory Affairs Waterford 3 SES Entergy Operations, Inc.


17265 River Road Killona, LA 70066-0751
17265 River Road Killona, LA 70066-0751
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 13:13, 23 November 2019

IR 05000382 06-006; on 06/19 - 22/2006; Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3, Security Baseline Inspection; Equipment, Performance, Testing and Maintenance - Letter Only
ML063120256
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/19/2006
From: Shannon M
Plant Support Branch Region IV
To: Venable J
Entergy Operations
References
IR-06-006
Download: ML063120256 (3)
v • d • e


Text

uly 19, 2006

SUBJECT:

WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNIT 3 - NRC SECURITY INSPECTION REPORT 05000382/2006006

Dear Mr. Venable:

On June 22, 2006, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security baseline inspection at your Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 facility. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results which were discussed on June 22, 2006, with you, and other members of your staff.

This inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.

The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.

This report documents one finding of very low safety significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process). The deficiency was promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors left the site.

NRC is treating this violation as a non-cited violation (NCV) consistent with Section VI.A.1 of the NRC Enforcement Policy because of the very low safety significance of the violation and because it is entered into your corrective action program. If you contest this non-cited violation, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of the inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear regulatory Commission, ATTN.: Document Control Desk, Washington D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator Region IV; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 facility. Entergy Operations, Inc. -2-In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRCs document system, ADAMS.

ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (The Public Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letters enclosure will not be available for public inspection.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs document system ADAMS. If Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, mark your entire response Security Related Information - Withhold under 10 CFR 2.390 and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Michael P. Shannon, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket: 50-382 License: NPF-38 Nonpublic Enclosure: Inspection Report 05000382/2006006 w/attachment: Supplemental Information cc w/enclosure:

Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Entergy Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 Vice President, Operations Support Entergy Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 Entergy Operations, Inc. -3-General Manager, Plant Operations Waterford 3 SES Entergy Operations, Inc.

17265 River Road Killona, LA 70066-0751 Manager - Licensing Manager Waterford 3 SES Entergy Operations, Inc.

17265 River Road Killona, LA 70066-0751 Director, Nuclear Safety &

Regulatory Affairs Waterford 3 SES Entergy Operations, Inc.

17265 River Road Killona, LA 70066-0751

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000382/2006006&oldid=2184308"