L-09-242, Supplemental Information for the Review of License Renewal Application and Amendment No. 40: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 09/02/2009
| issue date = 09/02/2009
| title = Supplemental Information for the Review of License Renewal Application and Amendment No. 40
| title = Supplemental Information for the Review of License Renewal Application and Amendment No. 40
| author name = Sena P P
| author name = Sena P
| author affiliation = FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
| author affiliation = FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Beaver Valley Power Station P.O. Box 4 Shippingport, PA 15077 Peter P. Sena III 724-682-5234 Site Vice President Fax: 724-643-8069 September 2, 2009 L-09-242 10 CFR 54 ATTN: Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
{{#Wiki_filter:Beaver Valley Power Station P.O. Box 4 Shippingport,PA 15077 PeterP. Sena III                                                                                   724-682-5234 Site Vice President                                                                           Fax: 724-643-8069 September 2, 2009 L-09-242                                                     10 CFR 54 ATTN: Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 BV-1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 BV-2 Docket No. 50-412, License No. NPF-73 Supplemental Information for the Review of the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application (TAC Nos. MD6593 and MD6594), and License Renewal Application Amendment No. 40 Reference 1 provided the FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) License Renewal Application (LRA) for the Beaver Valley Power Station (BVPS). Reference 2 provided Amendment No. 39 to Reference  
 
: 1. This letter clarifies and expands information provided in Reference 2 as discussed in a September 1, 2009 telephone conference call between FENOC and the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).The Attachment provides the clarification and expanded information.
Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 BV-1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 BV-2 Docket No. 50-412, License No. NPF-73 Supplemental Information for the Review of the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application (TAC Nos. MD6593 and MD6594), and License Renewal Application Amendment No. 40 Reference 1 provided the FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) License Renewal Application (LRA) for the Beaver Valley Power Station (BVPS). Reference 2 provided Amendment No. 39 to Reference 1. This letter clarifies and expands information provided in Reference 2 as discussed in a September 1, 2009 telephone conference call between FENOC and the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
The Enclosure provides Amendment 40 to the BVPS LRA.There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter. If there are any questions or if additional information is required, please contact Mr. Clifford I. Custer, Fleet License Renewal Project Manager, at 724-682-7139.
The Attachment provides the clarification and expanded information. The Enclosure provides Amendment 40 to the BVPS LRA.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on September c ,2009.Since]ly, Peter P. Sena III Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 L-09-242 Page 2  
There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter. If there are any questions or if additional information is required, please contact Mr. Clifford I. Custer, Fleet License Renewal Project Manager, at 724-682-7139.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on September c         ,2009.
Since]ly, Peter P. Sena III
 
Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 L-09-242 Page 2


==References:==
==References:==
: 1. FENOC Letter L-07-113, "License Renewal Application," August 27, 2007.2. FENOC Letter L-09-205, "Supplemental Information for the Review of the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application (TAC Nos.MD6593 and MD6594), and License Renewal Application Amendment No. 39," July 28, 2009.
: 1. FENOC Letter L-07-113, "License Renewal Application," August 27, 2007.
: 2. FENOC Letter L-09-205, "Supplemental Information for the Review of the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application (TAC Nos.
MD6593 and MD6594), and License Renewal Application Amendment No. 39,"
July 28, 2009.


==Attachment:==
==Attachment:==


Supplemental Information Regarding Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application, Section B.2.3  
Supplemental Information Regarding Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application, Section B.2.3


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==


Amendment No. 40 to the BVPS License Renewal Application cc: Mr. K. L. Howard, NRC DLR Project Manager Mr. S. J. Collins, NRC Region I Administrator cc: w/o Attachment or Enclosure Mr. B. E. Holian, NRC DLR Director Mr. D. L. Werkheiser, NRC Senior Resident Inspector Ms. N. S. Morgan, NRC DORL Project Manager Mr. D. J. Allard, PA BRP/DEP Director Mr. L. E. Ryan, PA BRP/DEP ATTACHMENT L-09-242 Supplemental Information Regarding Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application, Section B.2.3 Page 1 of 4 1. Describe the failure criteria for volumetric (UT) examination which will trigger the UT scanning at additional locations.
Amendment No. 40 to the BVPS License Renewal Application cc: Mr. K. L. Howard, NRC DLR Project Manager Mr. S. J. Collins, NRC Region I Administrator cc: w/o Attachment or Enclosure Mr. B. E. Holian, NRC DLR Director Mr. D. L. Werkheiser, NRC Senior Resident Inspector Ms. N. S. Morgan, NRC DORL Project Manager Mr. D. J. Allard, PA BRP/DEP Director Mr. L. E. Ryan, PA BRP/DEP
In establishing the criteria, distinguish between the criteria used; (1) if the metal thinning is attributed to degradation on the inside surface of the liner, and (2) if the metal thinning is attributable to the exterior surface (in contact with the containment concrete)of the liner.Metal thinning attributed to degradation on the inside surface of the liner will be managed in accordance with the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section Xl, Subsection IWE Program. The statistical sampling program is not applicable to degradation of the inside surface of the liner.The statistical sample failure criteria for volumetric (ultrasonic testing (UT))examinations of the concrete to liner interface is defined as greater than 10% loss of material from the nominal thickness that is characterized through engineering evaluation as pitting corrosion degradation indicative of foreign material.
 
Industry and site specific operating experience (OE) has demonstrated that pitting corrosion degradation due to foreign material manifests with pits that have measurable breadth and shape. Locations with identified loss of material less than 10% but with a breadth and shape that potentially indicates the presence of foreign material will be entered into the corrective action program and tracked as a point of interest for monitoring during subsequent outages until dispositioned by trending.FENOC intends to characterize locations with greater than 10% loss of material and displaying breadth and shape as statistical failures unless through engineering evaluation it is determined that indications are attributed to fabrication/erection practices.
ATTACHMENT L-09-242 Supplemental Information Regarding Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application, Section B.2.3 Page 1 of 4
Samples with greater than 10% loss of material would be entered into the corrective action program and re-examined during subsequent outages until dispositioned by trending.Unit 1 inspections for the initial sample lot of a minimum of 75 random samples will be completed in the next three refueling outages, beginning with the next Unit 1 refueling outage in 2010. Results will be available for on-site review and included in the summary report letter as described in Question 3.
: 1. Describe the failure criteria for volumetric (UT) examination which will trigger the UT scanning at additional locations. In establishing the criteria, distinguish between the criteria used; (1) if the metal thinning is attributed to degradation on the inside surface of the liner, and (2) if the metal thinning is attributable to the exterior surface (in contact with the containment concrete) of the liner.
Attachment L-o9-242 Page 2 of 4 2. Describe how you intend to statistically analyze the results of the UT examinations of the random and non-random samples (e.g., Kriging analysis or similar method) to determine the general state of the liner. Provide justification that your approach will adequately characterize the general state of the liner.The purpose of the random sampling plan is to make valid characterizations about the general state of the containment liner. The random sampling plan includes 100% UT of a minimum of seventy-five (75) 1-ft x 1-ft square areas randomly selected on the accessible ultrasonically untested portion of the containment liner per unit. The completion of the random sampling is designed to provide a confidence level of 95%that 95% of the ultrasonically untested containment liner is not experiencing localized pitting corrosion degradation that would challenge the integrity of the containment liner.FENOC will evaluate if an appropriate/applicable statistical method exists to gain additional insight into potential liner degradation.
Metal thinning attributed to degradation on the inside surface of the liner will be managed in accordance with the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Data gathered will be evaluated and used to determine the general state of the liner.
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section Xl, Subsection IWE Program. The statistical sampling program is not applicable to degradation of the inside surface of the liner.
Attachment L-09-242 Page 3 of 4 3. Discuss your plans to submit the results of the UT examinations, and any associated analyses, to the NRC.The results (data and analysis) of random sample testing and non-random sample testing, will be maintained as program/plant records. Data or evaluations that constitute failed acceptance criteria will be documented in the corrective action program. FENOC will provide a summary of the UT testing results as docketed information after each completed outage where sampling has been performed.
The statistical sample failure criteria for volumetric (ultrasonic testing (UT))
Unit 1 inspections for the initial sample lot of 75 random samples will be completed in the next three refueling outages, beginning with the next Unit 1 refueling outage in 2010. Results will be available for on-site review.4. Provide additional details on the criteria for selecting the locations of the minimum of 8 non-random samples, e.g., the location of the through-wall hole identified in April 2009, areas that have required coating, and areas where the wood spacers are likely to have been placed during construction based on a review of construction drawings.
examinations of the concrete to liner interface is defined as greater than 10% loss of material from the nominal thickness that is characterized through engineering evaluation as pitting corrosion degradation indicative of foreign material. Industry and site specific operating experience (OE) has demonstrated that pitting corrosion degradation due to foreign material manifests with pits that have measurable breadth and shape. Locations with identified loss of material less than 10% but with a breadth and shape that potentially indicates the presence of foreign material will be entered into the corrective action program and tracked as a point of interest for monitoring during subsequent outages until dispositioned by trending.
Provide justification for the adequacy of using 8 samples.The initial non-random sample population will be a minimum of 8 selected locations as determined by engineering judgment.
FENOC intends to characterize locations with greater than 10% loss of material and displaying breadth and shape as statistical failures unless through engineering evaluation it is determined that indications are attributed to fabrication/erection practices. Samples with greater than 10% loss of material would be entered into the corrective action program and re-examined during subsequent outages until dispositioned by trending.
These locations will be selected from locations that are in UT accessible locations and are not previously ultrasonically tested locations.
Unit 1 inspections for the initial sample lot of a minimum of 75 random samples will be completed in the next three refueling outages, beginning with the next Unit 1 refueling outage in 2010. Results will be available for on-site review and included in the summary report letter as described in Question 3.
 
Attachment L-o9-242 Page 2 of 4
: 2. Describe how you intend to statistically analyze the results of the UT examinations of the random and non-random samples (e.g., Kriging analysis or similar method) to determine the general state of the liner. Provide justification that your approach will adequately characterize the general state of the liner.
The purpose of the random sampling plan is to make valid characterizations about the general state of the containment liner. The random sampling plan includes 100% UT of a minimum of seventy-five (75) 1-ft x 1-ft square areas randomly selected on the accessible ultrasonically untested portion of the containment liner per unit. The completion of the random sampling is designed to provide a confidence level of 95%
that 95% of the ultrasonically untested containment liner is not experiencing localized pitting corrosion degradation that would challenge the integrity of the containment liner.
FENOC will evaluate if an appropriate/applicable statistical method exists to gain additional insight into potential liner degradation. Data gathered will be evaluated and used to determine the general state of the liner.
 
Attachment L-09-242 Page 3 of 4
: 3. Discuss your plans to submit the results of the UT examinations, and any associated analyses, to the NRC.
The results (data and analysis) of random sample testing and non-random sample testing, will be maintained as program/plant records. Data or evaluations that constitute failed acceptance criteria will be documented in the corrective action program. FENOC will provide a summary of the UT testing results as docketed information after each completed outage where sampling has been performed.
Unit 1 inspections for the initial sample lot of 75 random samples will be completed in the next three refueling outages, beginning with the next Unit 1 refueling outage in 2010. Results will be available for on-site review.
: 4. Provide additional details on the criteria for selecting the locations of the minimum of 8 non-random samples, e.g., the location of the through-wall hole identified in April 2009, areas that have required coating, and areas where the wood spacers are likely to have been placed during construction based on a review of construction drawings. Provide justification for the adequacy of using 8 samples.
The initial non-random sample population will be a minimum of 8 selected locations as determined by engineering judgment. These locations will be selected from locations that are in UT accessible locations and are not previously ultrasonically tested locations.
Additionally, site-specific and industry OE is to be used to determine locations that are susceptible to localized foreign material induced corrosion.
Additionally, site-specific and industry OE is to be used to determine locations that are susceptible to localized foreign material induced corrosion.
The following criteria will be considered for selection of the Unit 1 non-random sample population:
The following criteria will be considered for selection of the Unit 1 non-random sample population:
: 1. Locations that have required re-painting more than once. These are areas where the inside liner topcoat has required rework. The primer coat was intact at these locations.
: 1. Locations that have required re-painting more than once. These are areas where the inside liner topcoat has required rework. The primer coat was intact at these locations.
: 2. Locations that have irregular contour.3. The area approximately five feet below the lower one-third of the 2006 Steam Generator Replacement construction opening. This area was exposed to water from hydro-demolition-of the exterior concrete.4. The containment liner surface between Elevations 725' and 735' (final grade level). External surface of the concrete in this area has a greater potential for exposure to moisture.
: 2. Locations that have irregular contour.
The liner surface area with adjoining buildings will not be considered for non-random sampling.5., An area approximately 4.5-square feet horizontal to the 2009 through wall location on either side.
: 3. The area approximately five feet below the lower one-third of the 2006 Steam Generator Replacement construction opening. This area was exposed to water from hydro-demolition-of the exterior concrete.
: 4. The containment liner surface between Elevations 725' and 735' (final grade level). External surface of the concrete in this area has a greater potential for exposure to moisture. The liner surface area with adjoining buildings will not be considered for non-random sampling.
5., An area approximately 4.5-square feet horizontal to the 2009 through wall location on either side.
 
Attachment L-09-242 Page 4 of 4 The following criteria will be considered for selection of the Unit 2 non-random sample population:
Attachment L-09-242 Page 4 of 4 The following criteria will be considered for selection of the Unit 2 non-random sample population:
: 1. Locations that have required re-painting more than once. These are areas where the inside liner topcoat has required rework. The primer coat was intact at these locations.
: 1. Locations that have required re-painting more than once. These are areas where the inside liner topcoat has required rework. The primer coat was intact at these locations.
: 2. Locations that have irregular contour.3. The containment liner surface between Elevations 725' and 735' (final grade level). External surface of the concrete in this area has a greater potential for exposure to moisture.
: 2. Locations that have irregular contour.
The liner surface area with adjoining buildings will not be considered for non-random sampling.5. Describe your plans to share your results and findings with Electric Power Research Institute and other industry groups.FENOC plans to share the results of the containment liner sampling plan with the industry through contact with industry groups. The FENOC contact person would normally be the program owner.
: 3. The containment liner surface between Elevations 725' and 735' (final grade level). External surface of the concrete in this area has a greater potential for exposure to moisture. The liner surface area with adjoining buildings will not be considered for non-random sampling.
ENCLOSURE Beaver Valley Power Station (BVPS), Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Letter L-09-242 Amendment No. 40 to the BVPS License Renewal Application Page 1 of 4 License Renewal Application Sections Affected Table A.4-1 Table A.5-1 The Enclosure identifies the correction by Affected License Renewal Application (LRA)Section, LRA Page No., and Affected Paragraph and Sentence.
: 5. Describe your plans to share your results and findings with Electric Power Research Institute and other industry groups.
The count for the affected paragraph, sentence, bullet, etc. starts at the beginning of the affected Section or at the top of the affected page, as appropriate.
FENOC plans to share the results of the containment liner sampling plan with the industry through contact with industry groups. The FENOC contact person would normally be the program owner.
Below each section the reason for the change is identified, and the sentence affected is printed in italics with deleted text lined-eutand added text underlined.
 
Enclosure L-09-242 Page 2 of 4 Affected LRA Section LRA Page No.Affected Paragraph and Sentence New Item No. 34 Table A.4-1 Page A.4-9 LRA Table A.4-1, "Unit 1 License Renewal Commitments," is amended to add new Item No. 34, regarding examinations of the containment liner, as follows: Related LRA Item Implementation Sectio No.Number Commitment Schedule Source Section No./Comments 34 A summary of results for each phase January 29, FENOC None of volumetric testing (described in 2016 Letter Unit I Commitments No. 32 and L-09-242 No. 33 in LRA Amendment No. 39)will be documented in a letter to the NRC.Affected Paragraph Affected LRA Section LRA Page No. and Sentence Table A.4-1 Page A.4-9 New Item No. 35 LRA Table A.4-1, "Unit 1 License Renewal Commitments," is amended to add new Item No. 35, regarding examinations of the containment liner, as follows: Item Implementation Sectio No.Number Commitment Schedule Source Section No./Comments 35 FENOC will evaluate if an January 29, FENOC None appropriate/applicable statistical 2016 Letter method exists to gain additional L-09-242 insiqht into potential liner degradation.
ENCLOSURE Beaver Valley Power Station (BVPS), Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Letter L-09-242 Amendment No. 40 to the BVPS License Renewal Application Page 1 of 4 License Renewal Application Sections Affected Table A.4-1 Table A.5-1 The Enclosure identifies the correction by Affected License Renewal Application (LRA)
Section, LRA Page No., and Affected Paragraph and Sentence. The count for the affected paragraph, sentence, bullet, etc. starts at the beginning of the affected Section or at the top of the affected page, as appropriate. Below each section the reason for the change is identified, and the sentence affected is printed in italicswith deleted text lined-eutand added text underlined.
 
Enclosure L-09-242 Page 2 of 4 Affected Paragraph Affected LRA Section           LRA Page No.         and Sentence Table A.4-1                   Page A.4-9           New Item No. 34 LRA Table A.4-1, "Unit 1 License Renewal Commitments," is amended to add new Item No. 34, regarding examinations of the containment liner, as follows:
Related LRA No.
Item                                             Implementation   Sectio Number                 Commitment                     Schedule       Source Section No./
Comments 34     A summary of results for each phase         January29,     FENOC       None of volumetric testing (describedin            2016         Letter Unit I Commitments No. 32 and                             L-09-242 No. 33 in LRA Amendment No. 39) will be documented in a letter to the NRC.
Affected Paragraph Affected LRA Section         LRA Page No.         and Sentence Table A.4-1                   Page A.4-9           New Item No. 35 LRA Table A.4-1, "Unit 1 License Renewal Commitments," is amended to add new Item No. 35, regarding examinations of the containment liner, as follows:
Item                                               Implementation   Sectio           No.
Number                 Commitment                     Schedule     Source   Section No./
Comments 35     FENOC will evaluate if an                   January29,     FENOC       None appropriate/applicablestatistical              2016         Letter method exists to gain additional                           L-09-242 insiqht into potential liner degradation.
Data gathered will be evaluated and used to determine the general state of the liner.
Data gathered will be evaluated and used to determine the general state of the liner.
Enclosure L-09-242 Page 3.of 4 Affected Paragraph and Sentence Affected LRA Section LRA Page No.Table A.4-1 Page A.4-9 Item No. 32 Commitment No. 32 in LRA Table A.4-1, "Unit 1 License Renewal Commitments," is revised as follows: Related LRA Item ImplementationRead A temCommitment Ipeme Source Section No./Number CSchedule Comments 32 Supplemental volumetric E*aminatiens FENOC None examinations will be performed on the wigl -cmmncncc Letter Unit 1 containment liner prior to the b, te-- end ef the L-09-205 period of extended operation.
 
Un"it Seventy-five (one foot square) O"utag-e in an randomly selected (as described in Unit 1 FENOC FENOC Letter L-09-205) sample inspections for Letter locations will-be examined (as the initial sample L-09-242 described in FENOC Letter L-09-242).
Enclosure L-09-242 Page 3.of 4 Affected Paragraph Affected LRA Section         LRA Page No.         and Sentence Table A.4-1                   Page A.4-9           Item No. 32 Commitment No. 32 in LRA Table A.4-1, "Unit 1 License Renewal Commitments," is revised as follows:
lot of 75 random If degradation is identified, it will be ultrasonic addressed through the corrective examinations will action program. be completed in the next three refueling outages, beginning with the Unit I refueling outage in 2010.Examinations will be completed by January 29, 2016 Enclosure L-09-242 Page 4 of 4 Affected LRA Section LRA Page No.Page A.5-10 Affected Paragraph and Sentence New Item No. 35 Table A.5-1 LRA Table A.5-1, "Unit 2 License Renewal Commitments," is amended to add new Item No. 35, regarding examinations of the containment liner, as follows: Related LRA Item ImplementationRead A Nmem Commitment Smpeme Source Section No./Number Schedule Cmet Comments 35 A summary of results for each phase May 27, 2027 FENOC None of volumetric testing (described in Letter Unit 2 Commitments No. 33 and L-09-242 No. 34 in LRA Amendment No. 39)will be documented in a letter to the NRC.Affected Paragraph Affected LRA Section LRA Page No. and Sentence Table A.5-1 Page A.5-10 New Item No. 36 LRA Table A.5-1, "Unit 2 License Renewal Commitments," is amended to add new Item No. 36, regarding examinations of the containment liner, as follows: Related LRA Item Commitment Source Section No./Number Schedule Comments 36 FENOC will evaluate if an May 27, 2027 FENOC None appropriate/applicable statistical Letter method exists to gain additional L-09-242 insight into potential liner degradation.
Item                                            ImplementationRead              Related LRA A
temCommitment                                   Ipeme                   Source Section No./
Number                 CSchedule                                                   Comments 32   Supplemental volumetric                   E*aminatiens           FENOC       None examinations will be performed on the     wigl
                                                      -cmmncncc             Letter Unit 1 containment liner prior to the   b, te-- end ef the L-09-205 period of extended operation.             Un"it     .Refue.i*and Seventy-five (one foot square)           O"utag-e in               an randomly selected (as described in               Unit 1           FENOC FENOC Letter L-09-205) sample             inspections for         Letter locations will-be examined (as           the initial sample L-09-242 described in FENOC Letter L-09-242). lot of 75 random If degradation is identified, it will be     ultrasonic addressed through the corrective         examinations will action program.                         be completed in the next three refueling outages, beginning with the Unit I refueling outage in 2010.
Examinations will be completed by January 29, 2016
 
Enclosure L-09-242 Page 4 of 4 Affected Paragraph Affected LRA Section           LRA Page No.         and Sentence Table A.5-1                  Page A.5-10           New Item No. 35 LRA Table A.5-1, "Unit 2 License Renewal Commitments," is amended to add new Item No. 35, regarding examinations of the containment liner, as follows:
ImplementationRead          Related LRA A
Item Nmem                 Commitment                     Smpeme           Source Section No./
Number                                                 Schedule                 Cmet Comments 35   A summary of results for each phase         May 27, 2027     FENOC       None of volumetric testing (describedin                            Letter Unit 2 Commitments No. 33 and                               L-09-242 No. 34 in LRA Amendment No. 39) will be documented in a letter to the NRC.
Affected Paragraph Affected LRA Section         LRA Page No.         and Sentence Table A.5-1                   Page A.5-10           New Item No. 36 LRA Table A.5-1, "Unit 2 License Renewal Commitments," is amended to add new Item No. 36, regarding examinations of the containment liner, as follows:
Item                 Commitment                                     Source Related Section LRA No./
Number                                                 Schedule                 Comments 36   FENOC will evaluate if an                 May 27, 2027       FENOC     None appropriate/applicablestatistical                              Letter method exists to gain additional                             L-09-242 insight into potential liner degradation.
Data gathered will be evaluated and used to determine the general state of the liner.}}
Data gathered will be evaluated and used to determine the general state of the liner.}}

Latest revision as of 03:25, 14 November 2019

Supplemental Information for the Review of License Renewal Application and Amendment No. 40
ML092510168
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 09/02/2009
From: Sena P
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-09-242, TAC MD6593, TAC MD6594
Download: ML092510168 (10)


Text

Beaver Valley Power Station P.O. Box 4 Shippingport,PA 15077 PeterP. Sena III 724-682-5234 Site Vice President Fax: 724-643-8069 September 2, 2009 L-09-242 10 CFR 54 ATTN: Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

SUBJECT:

Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 BV-1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 BV-2 Docket No. 50-412, License No. NPF-73 Supplemental Information for the Review of the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application (TAC Nos. MD6593 and MD6594), and License Renewal Application Amendment No. 40 Reference 1 provided the FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) License Renewal Application (LRA) for the Beaver Valley Power Station (BVPS). Reference 2 provided Amendment No. 39 to Reference 1. This letter clarifies and expands information provided in Reference 2 as discussed in a September 1, 2009 telephone conference call between FENOC and the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).

The Attachment provides the clarification and expanded information. The Enclosure provides Amendment 40 to the BVPS LRA.

There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter. If there are any questions or if additional information is required, please contact Mr. Clifford I. Custer, Fleet License Renewal Project Manager, at 724-682-7139.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on September c ,2009.

Since]ly, Peter P. Sena III

Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 L-09-242 Page 2

References:

1. FENOC Letter L-07-113, "License Renewal Application," August 27, 2007.
2. FENOC Letter L-09-205, "Supplemental Information for the Review of the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application (TAC Nos.

MD6593 and MD6594), and License Renewal Application Amendment No. 39,"

July 28, 2009.

Attachment:

Supplemental Information Regarding Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application, Section B.2.3

Enclosure:

Amendment No. 40 to the BVPS License Renewal Application cc: Mr. K. L. Howard, NRC DLR Project Manager Mr. S. J. Collins, NRC Region I Administrator cc: w/o Attachment or Enclosure Mr. B. E. Holian, NRC DLR Director Mr. D. L. Werkheiser, NRC Senior Resident Inspector Ms. N. S. Morgan, NRC DORL Project Manager Mr. D. J. Allard, PA BRP/DEP Director Mr. L. E. Ryan, PA BRP/DEP

ATTACHMENT L-09-242 Supplemental Information Regarding Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application, Section B.2.3 Page 1 of 4

1. Describe the failure criteria for volumetric (UT) examination which will trigger the UT scanning at additional locations. In establishing the criteria, distinguish between the criteria used; (1) if the metal thinning is attributed to degradation on the inside surface of the liner, and (2) if the metal thinning is attributable to the exterior surface (in contact with the containment concrete) of the liner.

Metal thinning attributed to degradation on the inside surface of the liner will be managed in accordance with the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section Xl, Subsection IWE Program. The statistical sampling program is not applicable to degradation of the inside surface of the liner.

The statistical sample failure criteria for volumetric (ultrasonic testing (UT))

examinations of the concrete to liner interface is defined as greater than 10% loss of material from the nominal thickness that is characterized through engineering evaluation as pitting corrosion degradation indicative of foreign material. Industry and site specific operating experience (OE) has demonstrated that pitting corrosion degradation due to foreign material manifests with pits that have measurable breadth and shape. Locations with identified loss of material less than 10% but with a breadth and shape that potentially indicates the presence of foreign material will be entered into the corrective action program and tracked as a point of interest for monitoring during subsequent outages until dispositioned by trending.

FENOC intends to characterize locations with greater than 10% loss of material and displaying breadth and shape as statistical failures unless through engineering evaluation it is determined that indications are attributed to fabrication/erection practices. Samples with greater than 10% loss of material would be entered into the corrective action program and re-examined during subsequent outages until dispositioned by trending.

Unit 1 inspections for the initial sample lot of a minimum of 75 random samples will be completed in the next three refueling outages, beginning with the next Unit 1 refueling outage in 2010. Results will be available for on-site review and included in the summary report letter as described in Question 3.

Attachment L-o9-242 Page 2 of 4

2. Describe how you intend to statistically analyze the results of the UT examinations of the random and non-random samples (e.g., Kriging analysis or similar method) to determine the general state of the liner. Provide justification that your approach will adequately characterize the general state of the liner.

The purpose of the random sampling plan is to make valid characterizations about the general state of the containment liner. The random sampling plan includes 100% UT of a minimum of seventy-five (75) 1-ft x 1-ft square areas randomly selected on the accessible ultrasonically untested portion of the containment liner per unit. The completion of the random sampling is designed to provide a confidence level of 95%

that 95% of the ultrasonically untested containment liner is not experiencing localized pitting corrosion degradation that would challenge the integrity of the containment liner.

FENOC will evaluate if an appropriate/applicable statistical method exists to gain additional insight into potential liner degradation. Data gathered will be evaluated and used to determine the general state of the liner.

Attachment L-09-242 Page 3 of 4

3. Discuss your plans to submit the results of the UT examinations, and any associated analyses, to the NRC.

The results (data and analysis) of random sample testing and non-random sample testing, will be maintained as program/plant records. Data or evaluations that constitute failed acceptance criteria will be documented in the corrective action program. FENOC will provide a summary of the UT testing results as docketed information after each completed outage where sampling has been performed.

Unit 1 inspections for the initial sample lot of 75 random samples will be completed in the next three refueling outages, beginning with the next Unit 1 refueling outage in 2010. Results will be available for on-site review.

4. Provide additional details on the criteria for selecting the locations of the minimum of 8 non-random samples, e.g., the location of the through-wall hole identified in April 2009, areas that have required coating, and areas where the wood spacers are likely to have been placed during construction based on a review of construction drawings. Provide justification for the adequacy of using 8 samples.

The initial non-random sample population will be a minimum of 8 selected locations as determined by engineering judgment. These locations will be selected from locations that are in UT accessible locations and are not previously ultrasonically tested locations.

Additionally, site-specific and industry OE is to be used to determine locations that are susceptible to localized foreign material induced corrosion.

The following criteria will be considered for selection of the Unit 1 non-random sample population:

1. Locations that have required re-painting more than once. These are areas where the inside liner topcoat has required rework. The primer coat was intact at these locations.
2. Locations that have irregular contour.
3. The area approximately five feet below the lower one-third of the 2006 Steam Generator Replacement construction opening. This area was exposed to water from hydro-demolition-of the exterior concrete.
4. The containment liner surface between Elevations 725' and 735' (final grade level). External surface of the concrete in this area has a greater potential for exposure to moisture. The liner surface area with adjoining buildings will not be considered for non-random sampling.

5., An area approximately 4.5-square feet horizontal to the 2009 through wall location on either side.

Attachment L-09-242 Page 4 of 4 The following criteria will be considered for selection of the Unit 2 non-random sample population:

1. Locations that have required re-painting more than once. These are areas where the inside liner topcoat has required rework. The primer coat was intact at these locations.
2. Locations that have irregular contour.
3. The containment liner surface between Elevations 725' and 735' (final grade level). External surface of the concrete in this area has a greater potential for exposure to moisture. The liner surface area with adjoining buildings will not be considered for non-random sampling.
5. Describe your plans to share your results and findings with Electric Power Research Institute and other industry groups.

FENOC plans to share the results of the containment liner sampling plan with the industry through contact with industry groups. The FENOC contact person would normally be the program owner.

ENCLOSURE Beaver Valley Power Station (BVPS), Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Letter L-09-242 Amendment No. 40 to the BVPS License Renewal Application Page 1 of 4 License Renewal Application Sections Affected Table A.4-1 Table A.5-1 The Enclosure identifies the correction by Affected License Renewal Application (LRA)

Section, LRA Page No., and Affected Paragraph and Sentence. The count for the affected paragraph, sentence, bullet, etc. starts at the beginning of the affected Section or at the top of the affected page, as appropriate. Below each section the reason for the change is identified, and the sentence affected is printed in italicswith deleted text lined-eutand added text underlined.

Enclosure L-09-242 Page 2 of 4 Affected Paragraph Affected LRA Section LRA Page No. and Sentence Table A.4-1 Page A.4-9 New Item No. 34 LRA Table A.4-1, "Unit 1 License Renewal Commitments," is amended to add new Item No. 34, regarding examinations of the containment liner, as follows:

Related LRA No.

Item Implementation Sectio Number Commitment Schedule Source Section No./

Comments 34 A summary of results for each phase January29, FENOC None of volumetric testing (describedin 2016 Letter Unit I Commitments No. 32 and L-09-242 No. 33 in LRA Amendment No. 39) will be documented in a letter to the NRC.

Affected Paragraph Affected LRA Section LRA Page No. and Sentence Table A.4-1 Page A.4-9 New Item No. 35 LRA Table A.4-1, "Unit 1 License Renewal Commitments," is amended to add new Item No. 35, regarding examinations of the containment liner, as follows:

Item Implementation Sectio No.

Number Commitment Schedule Source Section No./

Comments 35 FENOC will evaluate if an January29, FENOC None appropriate/applicablestatistical 2016 Letter method exists to gain additional L-09-242 insiqht into potential liner degradation.

Data gathered will be evaluated and used to determine the general state of the liner.

Enclosure L-09-242 Page 3.of 4 Affected Paragraph Affected LRA Section LRA Page No. and Sentence Table A.4-1 Page A.4-9 Item No. 32 Commitment No. 32 in LRA Table A.4-1, "Unit 1 License Renewal Commitments," is revised as follows:

Item ImplementationRead Related LRA A

temCommitment Ipeme Source Section No./

Number CSchedule Comments 32 Supplemental volumetric E*aminatiens FENOC None examinations will be performed on the wigl

-cmmncncc Letter Unit 1 containment liner prior to the b, te-- end ef the L-09-205 period of extended operation. Un"it .Refue.i*and Seventy-five (one foot square) O"utag-e in an randomly selected (as described in Unit 1 FENOC FENOC Letter L-09-205) sample inspections for Letter locations will-be examined (as the initial sample L-09-242 described in FENOC Letter L-09-242). lot of 75 random If degradation is identified, it will be ultrasonic addressed through the corrective examinations will action program. be completed in the next three refueling outages, beginning with the Unit I refueling outage in 2010.

Examinations will be completed by January 29, 2016

Enclosure L-09-242 Page 4 of 4 Affected Paragraph Affected LRA Section LRA Page No. and Sentence Table A.5-1 Page A.5-10 New Item No. 35 LRA Table A.5-1, "Unit 2 License Renewal Commitments," is amended to add new Item No. 35, regarding examinations of the containment liner, as follows:

ImplementationRead Related LRA A

Item Nmem Commitment Smpeme Source Section No./

Number Schedule Cmet Comments 35 A summary of results for each phase May 27, 2027 FENOC None of volumetric testing (describedin Letter Unit 2 Commitments No. 33 and L-09-242 No. 34 in LRA Amendment No. 39) will be documented in a letter to the NRC.

Affected Paragraph Affected LRA Section LRA Page No. and Sentence Table A.5-1 Page A.5-10 New Item No. 36 LRA Table A.5-1, "Unit 2 License Renewal Commitments," is amended to add new Item No. 36, regarding examinations of the containment liner, as follows:

Item Commitment Source Related Section LRA No./

Number Schedule Comments 36 FENOC will evaluate if an May 27, 2027 FENOC None appropriate/applicablestatistical Letter method exists to gain additional L-09-242 insight into potential liner degradation.

Data gathered will be evaluated and used to determine the general state of the liner.