ML13098A204: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 04/05/2013
| issue date = 04/05/2013
| title = Email - 04-05-2013 - PRB Initial Recommendation Regarding Oyster Creek 2.206 Petition
| title = Email - 04-05-2013 - PRB Initial Recommendation Regarding Oyster Creek 2.206 Petition
| author name = Lamb J G
| author name = Lamb J
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-2
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-2
| addressee name = Webster R
| addressee name = Webster R
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05000219
| docket = 05000219
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person = Lamb J G
| contact person = Lamb J
| case reference number = 2.206
| case reference number = 2.206
| package number = ml13098a200
| package number = ml13098a200

Revision as of 06:17, 22 June 2019

Email - 04-05-2013 - PRB Initial Recommendation Regarding Oyster Creek 2.206 Petition
ML13098A204
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 04/05/2013
From: John Lamb
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Webster R
- No Known Affiliation
Lamb J
Shared Package
ml13098a200 List:
References
2.206
Download: ML13098A204 (1)


Text

From:Lamb, John To:"Richard Webster" Cc:Howe, Allen; Hair, Christopher; Hunegs, Gordon; Tifft, Doug; McNamara, Nancy; Khanna, Meena; Kulp, Jeffrey

Patel, Amar; Screnci, Diane; Sheehan, Neil; McIntyre, David; Burnell, Scott; Dacus, Eugene; Weil, Jenny
Pelton, David; Mensah, Tanya; Banic, Merrilee

Subject:

PRB Initial Recommendation regarding Oyster Creek 2.206 Petition Date:Friday, April 05, 2013 11:05:00 AM Attachments:Attachment to Email - Initial PRB Recommendation.docx Importance:

High

Dear Mr. Webster:

Per Management Directive (MD) 8.11, I am writing to inform you of the Petition Review Board's (PRB's) initial recommendation made on April 3, 2013, regarding your petition dated November 19, 2012 (Agencywide Documents and Access Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12326A361), as supplemented November 30, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12338A246), and as supplemented by information you presented during the January 3, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13015A144), public meeting.

In accordance with MD 8.11, Part III, C.2, "Criteria For Rejecting Petitions Under 10 CFR 2.206", the PRB's initial recommendation is that your petition raises issues for Oyster Creek that have already been reviewed, evaluated, and resolved by the NRC; therefore, your petition meets the criteria for rejection.

See the attached for details.

Per MD 8.11, you have another opportunity to provide additional facts to the PRB now that you have been informed of the initial recommendation.

Please advise me by Friday, April12, 2013, if you want to arrange a teleconference or public meeting so that you can provide additional information in support of your 10 CFR 2.206 petition request.

If I do notreceive a response from you by April 12, 2013, the PRB's initial recommendation will become final and will be documented in a 2.206 closure letter.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

John G. Lamb, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301-415-3100