RBG-41180, Forwards Proposed Clarifications to LAR 91-11 Re Removal of Component Lists,Addressing NRC Concern of Further Identifying Scope of TS Line Item,Per GLs 91-01 & 91-08

Forwards Proposed Clarifications to LAR 91-11 Re Removal of Component Lists,Addressing NRC Concern of Further Identifying Scope of TS Line Item,Per GLs 91-01 & 91-08

ML20078M108
Person / Time
Site:	River Bend
Issue date:	02/08/1995
From:	James Fisicaro ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20078M109	List: ML20078M117 RBG-41180, Forwards Proposed Clarifications to LAR 91-11 Re Removal of Component Lists,Addressing NRC Concern of Further Identifying Scope of TS Line Item,Per GLs 91-01 & 91-08
References
GL-91-01, GL-91-08, GL-91-1, GL-91-8, RBF1-95-0036, RBF1-95-36, RBG-41180, TAC-M88872, NUDOCS 9502130246
Download: ML20078M108 (3)

Text

1 l

Entergy Operattoro,Inc. I

- 8+ River Bend Station 5485 U S. Highway 61 l t rancis le. LA 70775  !

Tel 504 336 6225 ,

. Fax 504 635 5068

. James J. Raicaro i' Director NJCleaf safety j l

l February 8,1995 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Mail Stop Pl-37 Washington, DC 20555

Subject:

River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47

- License Amendment Request (LAR) 91-11, Removal of Component Lists (TAC M-88872)

File Nos.: G9.5, G9.42

Reference:

1) RBG-39894, dated January 14,1994

2) RBG-41056, dated November 10,1994 RBF1-95-0036 RBG-41180 I

Gentlemen:

On January 14,1994, Entergy Operations Inc. (EOl) submitted an application for amendment to the River Bend Station (RBS) Technical Specifications, License Amendment Request (LAR) 91- ,

11 (Reference 1). Included were proposed changes which would remove component lists from the Technical Specifications per guidance provided in NRC Generic Letters 91-01 and 91-08. On November 10,1994, the NRC Staff and RBS personnel discussed several clarifications to the information provided in Attachment 1 of RBG-39894. These changes addressed an NRC concern of further identifying the scope of the technical specification line item. This discussion resulted in several clarifications ofindividual specifications as documented in Reference 2.

As a result of further review of the application for amendment, additional clarifications of the t same type have been identified and addressed in Attachment I to this letter. These clarifications  ;

have been discussed with RBS's NRR Project Manager. Based on these discussions, RBS recommends including these clarifications in LAR 91-11.

9502130246 950208 i PDR ADOCK 05000458  ;

p PM  ;

g

Lic'ense Amendment Request 91-11

~

RBF1-95-0036 RBG-41180 February 8,1995 Page 2' of 2 Attachment 2 contains the originally submitted Technical Specification pages marked up to reflect the clarifications. The proposed clarifications are editorial and do not impact the scope of the original submittal, therefore, they are bounded by the No Significant 11azards Considerations previously submitted in RBG-39894.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact Mr. Otto P. Bulich of my staff at (504) 336-6251.

Very truly yours, w g)2 >

JF/jr attachments cc: Mr. David L. Wigginton U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission M/S OWFN 13-11-2 Washington, DC 20555 l NRC Resident Inspector  !

P. O. Box 1051  !

St. Francisville, LA 70775

)

U. S. Nuclear Regulatonj Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011

, License Amendment Request 91-11 RBF1-95-0036 ~ .

- RBG-41180_  !

Attachment I  !

PROPOSED CLARIFICATIONS TO LAR 91-11 u

i

~

Listed below are the proposed clarifications to LAR 91-11 based on discussions with the NRC.

These clarifying changes are editorial and are bounded by the No Significant Hazards i Considerations previously submitted in RBG-39894. Changes to the original submittal are noted ,

in italics.

1. RBG-39894 (dated 1/14/94) Attachment 1, page 17,Section XI, SECONDARY  !

CONTAINMENT AUTOMATIC ISOLATION DAMPERS (3/4.6.5.3) ,

a. Revise LCO 3.6.5.3 to read as follows:

"Each (delete the word ' required') secondary containment ventilation system automatic isolation damper shall be OPERABLE."

b. Revise ACTION Statement 3.6.5.3 to read as follows: ,

"With one or more of the (delete the word ' required') secondary containment ventilation system automatic isolation dampers inoperable, maintain at least one isolation damper l OPERABLE in each afTected penetration that is open and, within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />, either:

c. Revise Surveillance Requirement 4.6.5.3 to read as follows:

"Each (delete the word ' required') secondary containment ventilation system automatic isolation de.mper shall be demonstrated OPERABLE: ."

_