ML20237K454

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 5 to Procedure CP-CPM-6.3, Preparation,Approval & Control of Operation Travelers
ML20237K454
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 12/14/1978
From:
BROWN & ROOT, INC. (SUBS. OF HALLIBURTON CO.)
To:
Shared Package
ML20237J194 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-87-87, FOIA-87-A-14 CP-CPM-6.3, NUDOCS 8708270183
Download: ML20237K454 (27)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:;, s. m .a PROCEDURE ISSUE i SROWN & ROOT, INC. NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE l CP-CPM-6.3 5 12/13/78 1 of 11 5 95 Om AA-N777 TITLE: ORIGINATOR: ; i REVIEWED ,/u I

  1. 44

" PREPARATION, APPROVAL / AND CONTROL OF OPERATION TRAVELER $" APPROVED BY / /. v[JY 'GNalRUCTION PpEGT plANAGER DALE l ~ INDEXED i l CPSES CONTENTS

1.0 REFERENCES

2.0 GENERAL j 2.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 2.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS E I Q 2.3 AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY l

2.4 DESCRIPTION

OF AN OPERATION TRAVELER /CN#- / 2.5 TITLES gp #_'t, 3.0 PROCEDURE 1 3.1 BASIC PREPARATION SEQUENCE 3.2 ENGINEERING REVIEW j 3.3 QA/QC REVIEW 3.4 RECORD COLLECTION 3.5 LOT RELEASE AND CONTROL 3.6 TRAVELER CHANGE CONTROL 3.7 TRAVELER "IN-PROCESS" AND " COMPLETED" CONTROL NOTE This document has been completely retyped for convenience in issuing Revision 5. Vertical lines (change bars) appear-ing in the margins indicate what information was actually 1 changed, added or deleted by Revision 5. l U I l 8 ~~ \\ ~ y I 8708270183 870819 ~ BbMd. 4.-A-14 PDR

l l U

  • d 818GI 98/P2/40

.LSNOD-DbN S3Sd3 Wobd ree - .a,e,,n o .~ IND EXED ISSUE BROWN & ROOT, INC. PROCEDURE cuf@,TE PAGE CPSES NUMBER REVISION 1 b / JOB 35-1195 CP-CPM-6.3 6 10-30-79 1 of 10 \\ TITLE: ORIGINATORS M/~(( 0 'O REVIEWED BY: t7 OPERATION TRAVELERS" (7 ggjgg DATE~ APPROVED BY: $5Ax w) JN3W9 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER DATE CONTENTS CPSES 1195 1,0 REFERENCES 2.0 GENERAL 2.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 2.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIRE!iENTS 2.3 AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY Q

2.4 DESCRIPTION

OF AN OPERATION TRAVELER CONM 2.5 TITLES 3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 BASIC PREPARATION SEQUENCE ~ 3.2 ENGINEERING REVIEW 3.3 QA/QC REVIEW 3.4 RECORD COLLECTION 3.5 LOT RELEASE AND CONTROL 3.6 TRAVELER CHANGE CONTROL 3.7 TRAVELER "IN-PROCESS" AND " COMPLETED" CONTROL NOTE _ This document has been conpletely retyped for convenience j is issuing Revision 6. Vertical lines (change bars) appear-ing in the margins indicate what information was actually changed, added or deleted by Revision 6. l l i ____-__-_____-____________-_______A

1 BROWN & ROOT, INC. PROCEDURE ISSUE CPSES NUMBER l REVISION DATE PAGE d' - J08 35-1195 CP-CPM-6.3 6 10-30-79 2 of 10 1.0 REFERENCE _S } 1.1 B&R, CPSES Construction Procedure CP-CPM-6.1, " Preparation and Approval of Construction Procedures And Engineering Instructions". 1.2 B&R, CPSES Quality Procedure, CP-QAP-5.1, " Preparation and Approval of Quality Procedures And Instructions". 1.3 Bt.R. CPSES Construction Procedure, 35-1195-SFP-2, " BOP Records Filing". 1.4 B&R, CPSES Construction Procedure, CP-CPM-6.9. " General Piping and Inspection Procedun. ' 2.0 GENERAL 2.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE This procedure describes the preparation, approval and con-V ,2.1.1 trol of operation travelers which may be used at CPSES to control activities affecting quality. The requirenants of this procedure are to be implemented by affected BAR Construc-tion and QA/QC personnel when the operation traveler systemThis is implemented for a given safety-related ("Q") activity. procedure may also be used for Balance of Plant (Non "Q") con-struction operations. If used for Balance of Plant work, state-ments in this procedure relating to QA/QC do not necessarily ap-ply and the functions relating to QA/QC may be accomplished by other B&R departments. 2.2 QUAllTY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 2.2.1 The operation traveler system has been designed to fulfill Quality Assurance criteria set forth in Regulatory documents and codes and standards applicable during the construction phase of CPSES. U e

J t l BROWN & ROOT, INC. PROCEDURE ISSUE NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE Q CPSES j JOB 35-1195 6 10-30-79 3 of 10 CP-CPii-6.3 2.2.2 When implemented as outlined in this procedure, the operation traveler system fully complies with the QA criteria and no additional controls are required. If only partially imple-mented, then additional controls in the fom of supplementary instructions may be required to meet the applicable require-ments. The provisions of References -1,1 and/or 1.2 may be utilized to supplement a partially implemented system. 2.3 AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY 2.3.1 Signature authority on a Cnntruction Operation Traveler rests with either the Construction Superintendent (s) responsible for the work or with the Construction Engineer (s) responsible for technical guidance. The site QA Manager is responsible through l the discipline Quality representatives to assure that the system is effectively implemented for the selected activities.

2.4 DESCRIPTION

OF AN OPERATION TRAVELER 2.4.1 The Operation Traveler (Figures 1 and 2) serves as a fabri-( j V cation / installation / inspection checklist describing operations necessary to achieve a quality end product in an efficient manner. Accordingly. the details required and included on the face of the traveler will vary depending on the complexity of the operation. 2.4.2 General infomation included on the operation traveler is as follows: a. Part, serial or tan number and material descriptions (s), where applicable, b. The department assigned the task to perform the operations (s). This is normally shown in the space provided on the traveler but may be documented in an alter-nate manner for simple operations. { c. Operation description, methods, procedures (instructions) by number and revision and other information as required to successfully complete the operation per applicable requirements. i U "42C $p sWPe*

l 8ROWN & ROOT INC. PROCEDURE ISSUE i y CPSES NUMBER REVISIOy DATE PAGE 4 JOB 35-1195 l 6 10-30-79 4 of 10 CP-CPM-6.3 d. All dimensions and tolerances necessary to assure com-p11ance to design drawings and specifications. This in-formation may be given by Reference, provided persons per-forming the work have access to the Reference. { Any needed offsite operations or p'rocessi g cited in the e. appropriate sequence with all other operations. f. Necessary instructions for handling, cleaning, storage and preservation of items. g. Required QC inspection, hold, or witness points. h. A bill of material for piping component supports. 2.5 TIT 1.ES 2.5.1 Titles, when used in this procedure apply to the specific person or his designee. 3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 BASIC PREPARATION SEQUENCE 3.1.1 Samples of the Traveler forms v.e shown in Figures 1, and 2. These forms may be obtained from the Construction Engineer. The operation sequence and necessary detailed information to be written on the traveler will be developed as a joint effort between the BAR construction craft personnel responsible for doing the work, construction engineering personnel re-sponsible for technical requirements, and QA/QC personnel responsible for Quality Assurance requirements. It is desirable to include all required info-mation (such as dimen-sions, specification data, and required supplementary ir.struc-tions) with the Traveler to make a complete " Traveler Package". However, the inclusion of information routinely available to the persons performing the work is not a requirement. The sequen-tial numbers assigned to each operation on the traveler are for identification purposes and are not necessarily 'a sequential order of work progression. 1 U I

1 !$5UE BROWN & ROOT, INC. PROCEDURE DATE pAGE h CPSES NUM8ER REVISION JOB 35-1195 t, i CP-CPM-6.3 .i 6 10-30-79 5 of 10 3.1.2 persons originating travelers are responsible to assign numbers to the travelers and to keep 100 book records of the numbers. The traveler numbering system is as follows: / Example, "MP79-001-5000" MP = identification letters representing the craft department or engineering discipline originating the traveler. 79 = The calendar year in which the Traveler was written 001 = The individual sequence number identifying a particular Traveler. 5000 = The turnover (start-up) system number for the activity described on the Traveler. NOTE For mechanical component supports the traveler number will be the component support identification number (if more than one traveler is required for a specific support, the mark number shall be suf-fixed by a -1 for the first additional traveler, etc.). For electrical cable tray supports the traveler num-ber will be the support mark nurrber prefixed by " Ele-79-CTH" (79 represents the year in which the traveler wasprepared). 3.1. 3 When a traveler is prepared, it shall be submitted to the Quality Engineering Department for review and assignment of inspection criteria. Review requirements for AStE related travelers are delineated in Reference 1.4. N0.1L When travelers are pmpared for operations that are repetitive and the travelers are all identical from a working stand-point, review by Quality Engineering and ANI is required only on the first traveler in(the repetitive series. On subsequent travelers that are not reviewedyreference to the number of the traveler that was reviewed shall be entered on the " Reviewed by" signature lines. U

BROWN & ROOT. INC. PROCEDURE l ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE Q JOB 35-1195 j CP-CPM-6.3 6 10-30-79 6 of 10 3.1.4 QE shall return the Traveler to the originator for distribution. I J All signoffs will be on the " original" making it the valid working document. Component support traveler packages shall be controlled ] in accordance with Reference 1.4. / 3.2 ENGINEERING REVIEWS I. J 3.2.1 At the request of the responsible General Superintendent, the Chief Project Engineer throunh the responsible Discipline Engi-neer shall complete reviews of applicable drawings, specifica-tions, procedures, and welding requirements to assure under-standing of and compliance with applicable design and construc-tion requirements. 3.3 QA/QC REVIEW 3.3.1 The Quality representative will perform a spot check of the com-plated forms for accuracy of information and will verify that required inspection, hold and witness points have been included. ~He will assure that quality documents have been prepared per the V provisions of Reference 1.2 and are referenced in the Operation Travelers as required to fully implement the QC functions. 3.4 RECORD COLLECTION 3.4.1 Traveler packages shall remain in the work area until the work described by the package has been completed and accept-ed by the responsible QC Inspectors. Component support travelers may be returned to the FWTC (in the same manner as WDC as stated in Reference 1.4) at the end of each work shift or when the final sign-off is completed. 3.5 LOT RELEASE AND CONTROL 3.5.1 tot Release 3.5.1.1 Quantities of identical detail parts or items may be authorized by the Quality representative on one Traveler package releate provided the parts or items are dimensionally identical and that material control and/or traceability requirements can be accomo-dated without creating an extensive and/or confusing record keep-ing or material marking system. The quantity of parts or items to be included in one lot may be detemined by the quantity of parts required to fabricate one assently or sub-assembly, or a quantity of parts that could remain as one lot until all parts or items are completed without jeopardizing the production schedule. y. +=

) -r l BROWN & ROOT, INC. PROCEDURE ISSUE Q CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE J08:35-1195 ' CP-CPM-6.3 6 10-30-79 7 of 10 3.5.2 Lot Control 3.5.2.1 A quantity of identical parts released as a lot /on a single Traveler nackage release shall remain. to~gether until all oper-ations have been completed and accepted. by inspection, and the parts / items have been delivered to storage or to another Trav-eler release for subsequent assembly / installation. If a non-conformance is detected on one or more parts / items of a lot dur-ing the operations, the conforming material and Traveler shall remain in a designated hold area until the nonconformance has been adequately dispositioned. The site QC Manager may author-12e certain exceptions to this rule. Such matters will be handled on a case basis. 3.5.2.2 If certain parts / items are dispositioned " Scrap" the quantity i of the lot on the Traveler shall be reduced to the quantity found to be acceptable by inspection. Replacement items, when required, shall be issued on another Traveler, reflecting a new release number. If an item or items in a lot requires g, 3 repair, such as welding, the entire lot shall be serialized N./ and appropriate records prepared to establish traceability for repatrable items as required by applicable codes and specifica-i tions. ) 3.6 TRAVELER CHANGE CONTROL 3.6.1 All changes, regardless of their significance, must be doc-umented on the Traveler, denoting the operations affected, 1 description and authority for the required change, and the ] Quality representative's approval. The revision number and j a description of the change will be noted on the traveler i below the last traveler operation of the original issue. If i necessary the revision description may be continued on a continuation sheet. The back side of the traveler for piping component supports will also depict the revision in the re-vision block. y 3.6.2 When design changes are received that affect issued and approv-ed travelers, the applicable changes will be made to the traveler { and it will then be reviewed in the same manner as the original i issue. At the superintendent's discretion and with QE concurrence (via 3 part memo), work may continue on the traveler operations not affected by the design change. Changes to component support traveler packages will be routed in accordance with Reference 1.4. U

P BROWN & ROOT, INC. . PROCEDURE ISSUE Q-CPSES - NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE i . JOB 35-1195 i CP-CpH-6.3 6 ' 10-30-79 8 of 10 3.7 TRAVELER "IN-PROCESS" AND " COMPLETED" CONTROL 3.7.1 Travelers shall be maintained complete throughout the construc-tion process. Each QC Operation requires the fnitials and date j by QC denoting the inspection status.' at the completion of each operation a. This shall be accomplished nd prior to moving parts 3 or assemblies to the next operation, unless otherwise noted on the Traveler. 3.7.2 It is expressly prohibited to proceed beyond any hold ooint requested by the Quality representative without his approval, reflected by his initials and date at the applicable operation on the Traveler. 3.7.3 The Quality Control supervisor is charged with the responsibility l for assuring that all operation Traveler instructions have been l complied with and all previous operations have been performed and accepted. The Discipline Inspection Supervisor is responsi-ble to the Quality Control Supervisor for the assurance that all l ( j completed items, assemblies or sub-assemblies meet the require- %/ ments of the applicable drawings and specifications - by inspection and acceptance of all items denoted on the Traveler and associated check lists or instructions. After all operations listed on the traveler have been completed and appropriately signed, the department supervisor implementing the work will submit the traveler to construction engineering, or to the FWTC for component support travelers. The discipline con-struction engineer will log such receipt of the traveler 3 and in turn if "Q" related submit it to the Quality Engineering i Department for review and incorporation into the CPSES documen-tation system. Travelers for Non "O items will be processed in l accordance with Reference 1.3. l 4 U

r. BROWN & ROOT. INC. PROCEDURE l ISSUr. CPSES NUMBER REVIS!ON ; OATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 l CP-CPM-6.3 6 10-30-79 9 of 10 FIGURE 1 SAMPLE TRAVELER FIRST SHEET CONSTRUCTION OPf AA?40N TAAVStan 36 bes @ TRAVtLEA No. @ 80VIPMtNT NO. @ff NO. pANTITY pect_0P, g AC7ivifY Of1CAIPfl04

  • gmf FRA4NCI ORAW6NGS g SPIC./PAOC./ENO. lasTA, p CAftom SvaTEM ene*Anso sv oArm

- eenr. RtVIEW10 SY _. DATE - SA/QC EN0' ANI ANs Arview __ OAff-4: 0,.

0. 0..r.

0,.. A10,. A,,, U I l o i k f U M' ~ a _____.__._.____m_____.__

e. ' ~ BROWN & ROOT, INC. PROCEDURE ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 g CP-CPH-6.3 i 6 10-30-79 10 6f 10 FIGURE 2 SAMPLE TRAVELER CONTINUATION SHEET CONSTRUMION OPfRATION TR AVELER CONTtNUAft0N TRAVEL 8RNO. ACflVITY OSSCRIPflON PAcL,0P_ PREPARED SV-DAT8 ,8 REVlfWED SY DATE ant RfVifw gayg QA/OC

08. N O DSPT.

OPERATION ENG ant U 4 l I i l f \\ l w JA - _ f i

ARMS JOB 35-1195 Q COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION INDEXED INTERIM CHANGE NOTICE NUMBER 2 ,m This notice applies to: Construction procedure CP-CPM-6.3 ._., Revision 5 _._, The intent of this change will (X) / will not ( ) be incorporated in the next / revision to,the procedure or instruction. ~ This Change applies: Until Further Notice ( ) Until the next Revision is issued (X) Only as follows: CHANGE THE PROCEDURE /!NSTRUCTION AS FOLLOWS: (1) Delete Reference 1.5. (2) Change Paragraph 3.1.3 to read as follows 3.1. 3 After the Traveler is prepared, it shall be submitted to QC for review. QA/QC will not be required to review each cable tray hanger traveler as each operational document will be identical ex-cept for the Traveler number. Review requirements for ASME related travelers are delineated in Reference 1.4. V (3) Change Par,agraph 3.1.4 to read as follows: 3.1.4 QC shall return the Traveler to the originator for distribution. All signeffs will be on the " original" making it the valid working document. Component support traveler packages shall be controlled in accordan:e with Reference 1.4. (4) Change Paragraph 3.6.2 to read as follows: 3.6.2 When design changes are received that affect issued and approved travelers, construction engineering shall notify the superinten-dent immediately. The applicable changes will be made to the trav-eler and it will then be reviewed in the same manner as the original issue. At the superintendent's discretion, work may continue on the traveler operations not affected by the design change. Changes to component support traveler packages will be routed in accordance with I Reference 1.4. Reason for change: Additional requirements. This change approved by: ( 0 m & ------ 34//7t hnM 6-t 7 Departalent Raad M.JN] ' Dets ty Assurance Date y Reviewee sy 2//// k.rnO '7 21.7? Procecures & Reports Date l Wh 8D EB*$9

-i { N a., AE JOB 35-1195 COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION ggg _y INTERIM CHANGE NOTICE NUMBER 1 oAm This notice applies to: Construction Procedure CP-CPM-6.3 . Revision L. The intent of this change will. (X) / will not ( ) be incor rated in the next revision to the procedure or 1nstruction. This Chan e applies: Unti Further Notice ( ) Until the ns.st Revision is issued (X) Only as follows:, CHANGE THE PROCEDURE / INSTRUCTION AS FOLLOWS: 1. Add the following sentence to Paragraph 3.6.2: Changes to component support traveler packages will be routed in accordance with Reference 1.5" 2. Add reference 1.5 as follo.ws: 1.5 CP-CPM-6.9 V i 1 Reason for change: Clarification This change aprMyed by: & $ ~ W 2"as 6/e/7f %Y-0 6 L*19 Depettetnt Head 'Date Qgality Ass 0fance Da'te 4w1FC W Q Reviewed By: $h b"$' ?? Date Procedures & Reports

4...

SROWN & ROOT INC. PROCEDURE !$$UE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE J08:35-1196 CP-CPM-6.3 5 12/13/78 2 of 11

1.0 REFERENCES

1.1 B&R, CPSES Construction Procedure, CP-CPM-6.1, " Preparation and Approval of Construction Procedures ~ And Engineering Instru;tions". 1.2 B&R, CPSES Quality Procedure, CP-QAP-5.1, " Preparation and Approval of Quality Procedures And Instructions".

1. 3.

B&R, CPSES Construction Procedure, 35-1195-SFP-2, "80P Records Filing". 1.4 B&R, CPSES Construction Procedure CP-CPM-6.9, " General Piping and Inspection Procedure" 2.0 GENERAL 2.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 2.1.1 This procedure describes the preparation, approval and con-trol of operation travelers which may be used at CPSES to control activities affecting quality. The requirements of this procedure are to be implemented by affected B&R Construc-tion and QA/QC personnel when the operation traveler system is implemented for a given safety-related ("Q") activity. This procedure may also be used for Balance of Plant (Non "Q") con-struction operations. If used for Balance of Plant work, state-f ments in this procedure relating to QA/QC do not necessarily ap-ply and the functions relating to QA/QC may be accomplished by other B&R departments. 2.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 2.2.1 The operation traveler system has been designed to fulfill Quality Assurance criteria set forth in Regulatory documents and codes and standards applicable during the construction phase of CPSES. U e w ne I L --. l

( 1. 8ROWN & ROOT. INC. PROCEDURE ISSUE h CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE J08 35-1195 CP-CPM-6.3 5 12/13/78 3 of 11 2.2.2 When implemented as outlined in this procedure, the operation traveler system fully complies with the QA criteria and no additional controls are required. If only partially imple-mented. then additional controls in the form of supplementary instructions may be required to meet.the applicable require-monts. The provisions of References 1.1 and/or 1.2 may be utilized to supplement a partially implemented system. 2.3 AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY 2.3.1 Signature authority on a Construction Operation Traveler rests with either the Construction Superintendent (s) responsible for the work or with the Construction Engineer (s) responsible for technical guidance. The site QC Manager is responsible through the discipline Quality representatives to assure that the system is effectively implemented for the selected activities.

2.4 DESCRIPTION

OF AN OPERATION TRAVELER h 2.4.1 The operation Traveler (Figures 2 and 3) serves as a fabri-cation / installation / inspection checklist describing operations necessary to achieve a quality and product in an efficient manner. Accordingly, the details required and included on the face of the traveler will vary depending on the complexity of the operation. 2.4.2 General information included on the operation traveler is as follows: a. Part, serial or tag numbe: and material description (s), where applicable. b. The department assigned the task to perform the operation (s). This is normally's'hown in the space provided on the traveler but may be documented in an alter-nate manner for simple operations, c. Operation description, methods, procedures (instructions) by number and revision and other information as required to successfully complete the operation per applicable requirements. U e'+

Q'- CPSES-PROCEDURE ISSUE BROWN & ROOT,_INC. NUMBER REVISION DATE pAGE JOB 35-1195 CP-CPM-6.3 5 12/13/78 4 of 11 -d. All dimensions and tolerances necessary to assure com-pliance to design drawings and specifications. This in-formation may be given by Reference, provided persons per-forming the work have access to the Reference. e. Any needed offsite operations or processing cited in the appropriate sequence with all other operations. 4 f. Necessary instructions for handling, cleaning, storage and - preservation of items, g. Required QC inspection, hold, or witness points. h. A bill of material for piping component supports. 2.5 TITLES 2.5.1 Titles, when used in this procedure appdy to the specific person or his designee. 3.0 PROCEDURE Q 3.1 BASIC PREPARATION SEQUENCE 3.1.1 Samples of the Traveler forms are shown in Figures 1, and 2. These forms may be obtained from the Construction Engineer. The operation sequence and necessary detailed information to' be written on the traveler will be developed as a joint effort between the B&R construction craft personnel responsible for doing the work, construction engineering personnel re-sponsible for technical requirements, and QA/QC personnel responsible for Quality Assurance requirements. It is desirable to include all required information (such as dimen-sions,specificatica data, and required supplementary instruc-tions) with the Traveler to make a complete " Traveler Package". However, the inclusion of information routinely available to the persons performing the work is not a requirement. The sequen-tial numbers assigned to each operation on the traveler are for identification purposes and are not necessarily a sequential order of work progression. U

BROWN & ROOT, INC. PROCEDURE ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE l 12/13/78 5 of 11 ~ ~ CP-CPM-6.3 5 3.1.2 The discipline construction engineer is responsible to assign numbers to Operation Travelers, and to keep a logbook record of the numbers. The traveler numbering system 1,s as follows: o Example, "MR79-001-5000" M = discipline (Mechanical, electrical, etc.) R = department (rigging, rebar, pipe, concrete,etc.) 79 = The calendar year in which the Traveler was written. 001 = The individu'al sequence number identifying a particular Traveler. 5000 = The turnover (start-up) system number for .the activity described on the Traveler. NOTE For mechanical component supports the traveler number will be the component support identification number (if more than one traveler is required for a specific support, the mark number shall' be suf-fixed by a-1 for the first additional traveler, etc.). For electrical cable tray supports the traveler num-ber will be the support mark number prefixed by " Ele-79-CTH" (79 represents the year in which the traveler was prepared). These are the only exceptions to the above numbering system. 3.1.3 When a Traveler is prepared and ready for signature, it shall be submitted to QA/QC for review, the addition of inspection hold or witness points. ANI review, and signature. QA/QC will not be required to review each cable tray hanger Traveler as each operational document will be identical except for the Trav-eler number. 3.1.4 After reviewing and signing, QA/QC shall return the Traveler to the originator for distribution to the fields except component support travelers shall be sent directly to weld-ing engineering to be distributed in the same manner as WDCs Lj per Reference 1.4. 611 QA/QC/AN!/ Engr. signoffs will be on %r the " original" making it the valid working document. At the discretion of the QA Hanager, a copy of the traveler may be filed in the QA vault for record retention. purposes.

j -) SR0WN & ROOT, INC. PROCEDURE !$$UE CPSE5 NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE h JOB 35-1195 CP-CPM-6.3 5 12/13/78 6 of 11 3.2 ENGINEERING REVIEW At the request of the responsible General Superintendent, the 3.2.1 Chief Project Engineer through the responsible' Discipline Engi-neer shall complete reviews of applicable drawings, specifica-tions, procedures, and welding requirements to assure under-4 standing of and compliance with applicable design and construc-tion requirements. 3.3 QA/QC REVIEW I The Quality representative will' perfom a spot check of the com-3.3.1 plated forms for accuracy of information and will verify that required inspection, hold and witness points have been included. He will assure that quality documents have been prepared per the . provisions of Reference 1.2 and are referenced in the Operation Travelers as required to fully implement the QC functions. 3.4 RECORD COLLECTION 3.4.1 Traveler packages shall remain in the work area until the work described by the package has been completed and accept-ed by the responsible QC Inspectors. Component support travelers may be returned to the FWTC (in the same manner as WDC as stated in Reference 1.4) at the end of each work shif t or when the final sign-off is completed. 3.5 LOT RELEASE AND CONTROL 3.5.1 Lot Release Quantities of identical detail parts or items may be authorized 3.5.1.1 by the Quality representative on one Traveler package release provided the parts or items are dimensionally identical and that material control and/or traceability requirements can be accomo-dated without creating an extensive and/or confusing record keep-ing or material marking system. The quantity of parts or items to be included in one lot may be determined by the quantity of parts required to fabricate one assembly or sub-assembly, or a quantity of parts that could remain as one lot until all parts or items are completed without jeopardizing the production schedule. U W

I' BROWN & ROOT, INC. PROCEDURE !$5UE .. - ) CPSE5-NUMBER REVIS!0N DATE PAGE V' J08 35-1195 CP-CPM-6.3 5 12/13/78 7 of 11 3.5.2 Lot Control 3.5.2.1 A quantity of identical parts released as a lot on a single l Traveler package release shall remain together until all oper-ations have been completed and accepted by inspection, and the l-parts / items have been gelivered to storage or to another Trav- ~ If a non-L eier release for sub*Wuent assably/ installation. conformance is deter ted on one er more parts / items of a lot dur-ing the operations: the conforming material and Traveler shall ~ remain in a-designi.ted hold area until the nonconformanc.e has been adequately dispositioned. The site QC Manager may author-ize certain exceptions to this rule. Such matters will De 1 handled on a case basis. 3.5.2.2 If certain parts / items are dispositioned " Scrap" the quantity of the lot on the Traveler shall be reduced to the quantity found to be acceptable by inspection. Replacement items, i when required, shall be issued on another Traveler, reflecting a new release number. If an item or items ia a lot requires repair, such as welding, the entire lot shall be serialized and appropriate records prepared to establish traceability for Q repairable items as required by applicable codes and specifica-tions. 3.6 TRAVELER CHANGE CONTROL 3.6.1 All changes, regardless of their significance, must be doc-umented on the Traveler, denoting the operations affected, description and authority for the required change, and the Quality representative's approval. The revision number and a description of the change will be noted on the traveler below the last traveler operatiori of the original issue. If necessary the revision description may be continued on a continuation sheet. The back side of the traveler for piping component supports will also depict the revision in the re-vision block. 3.6.2 When design changes are received that affect issued and approv-ed travelers, construction engineering shall notify the superin-tendent immediately. The applicable changes will be made to the traveler and it will then be reviewed in the same manner as the original issue. At the superintendent's discretion, work may continue on the traveler operations not affected by i I the design change. O l M E

I BROWN & ROOT, INC. PROCEDURE ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE J08.,35-1196 CP-CPM-6.3 5 12/13/78 8 of 11 1 3.7 TRAVELER "IN-PROCESS" AND " COMPLETED" CONTROL 3.7.1 Travelers shal.1 be maintained complete throughout the construc. tion process. Each QC Operation requires the initials and date' by QC denoting the inspection status., This shall be accomplished at the completion of each operation and prior to moving parts or assemblies to the next operation, unless otherwise noted on the Traveler. 3.7.2 It is expressly prohibited to proceed beyond any hold ooint requested by the Quality representative without his approval, reflected by his initials and date at the applicable operation on the Traveler. 3.7.3 The Quality Control Manager is charged with the responsibility for assuring that all operation Traveler instructions have been complied with and all previous operations have been performed and accepted. The Discipline Inspection Supervisor is responsi-ble to the Quali'ty Control Manager for the assurance that all U completed items, assemblies or sub-assemblies meet the require-ments of the applicable drawings and specifications - by inspection and acceptance of all items denoted on the Traveler and associated check lists or instructions. After all operations listed on the traveler have been completed and appropriately sigr,ed, the department supervisor implementing the work will submit the traveler to construction engineering, or to the FWTC for component support travelers. The discipline con-struction engineer will log such receipt of the traveler and in turn if "Q" related, submit it to the QC Department for incorporation into the CPSES documentation system. Travelers for Non *Q" items will be processed in accordance with P.eference 1.3. l l l i l. h. 6 4

a BROWN & ROOT, INC. PROCEDURE ISSUE g 3 CPSES NUMBER REV!$10N DATE PAGE q %./ 008 35-1195 CP CPM-6.3 5 12/13/78 9 of 11 FIGURE 1A SAMPLE TRAVELER FIRST SHEET - Front Side t l W. _. m. _ W B'iE&i'i F0 B B F ri a t. et P""i "'P""P P" w k.,e... m ma pn_atmn u.1-um.- u um u.auso#nem wu -. w uu.a o, mu.a

== 19*&&P9 PO.8 FSM teh eyeselse seed _ -' 6 9eles 4setra ygy4ggyg C.Es est gag a wea gyy.A ts_h. a m 'gy W. W. h.m gag ao me.. gfg gge gg ad! t tty - u/a gArt i Guett W.W. ' 4Ff. UFERAsttu ' se 1 Art 1 HM Insedi toesvas? 3* 88maae en anula da of taan 81 wang neessam e4 nues ed bassang essa. s getr> n,, . att enorm e sabe esse ener we eeded en ene eu. EE ande, teen tenha. 3 Men P1L1 tank S& wtet dominaru14aes ensar essee 100 erit 88 pump. - - m. m. 5 Moe I.aeuL1 toen emanasetna teen 6 ad ca. Imho eseasetes es esenaa 83 et Sat OS &a een aan se se da snap 1. 4 Nee spaa entons'ee a11aw tenha to egen& W. F estV) dear esser la been 'eanha La es assa tem 1, meda as pony Peen be tanh 61 end 44mesoness toes se tank 43 lasvaag wales to- >4as e. 4 Pips Peep mun&ades of under trou tak 01 to tanh 01. too esser tvun 84 emner se esaplacear #111 taan 43. f kff) Inevens di enW as sein et fee taehm. W 84 Ptpa teamader ensar nesh as "a -"aa' m as desente tank. f i l 6AMPLC l e e _w d - ' - " * ^ =**I.e. %==. ..e====m.**.

e. ca....-.

. =... l l l

l . 9. c ..e ,b. .A u BROWN & ROOT, INC. PROCEDURE ISSUE b CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 CP-CPM-6.3 5 12/13/78 10 of 11 FIGURE IB SAMPLETRAVELERFIRSTSHEET-Backside (for.CSTP) 8 M 2 n S. 9

t O

A 35 2 i se y !"a 1 8 s A 5 i si

  • 6 8

~. g 1. a ,2 f E B5 h E"2 Sjf!H fLf $N t t EE e 5-d 3 il l y l E m 3 fi I aals .g o e 3

  • T f?,

2*j k.i z.i x i E.-S d I l 5$ y$g3id I,I s o e n as s 1~,.2. 5.g l e, 8 l ~~ s 8 .s..s I,"le *i E" I e il ss i e e es E b EI $. 33 i 3 s i .,1@5$hhhh## E .E

  • 3 5 15 !.

le 2 I E E j g .m ~$ g I j ij =3 asta. 33 D 3 3 2 I I ] 82..a ES I 30 # "E5~8 j '5 I 5 ~ E E 1 5 'I I l } 5' \\]=3=5 \\\\ ~ ~

  • I

~ il.[..,a"3 t 3 1 lt s ! I { -{ flg!c.-- l a z l 2 3 363 1j j E l r 8eEE E E 8!ij}51 ) 2 5 53 5,. 3.: 5 3 -l 3 J pmie el OI e e e3 el et e ! V y 1n-. I e Basireae r r rs t. It t s al a i se a=. as 21= 8 O SS GO j a a A J J J a a i g y l 1 w 1 1

r, BROWN & ROOT. INC. PROCEDURE ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE ' JOB 35-1195 CP-CPM-6.3 5 12/13/78 11 of 11 FIGURE 2 SAMPLE TRAVELER CONTINUATION SHEET,. i r-C:Mn::cT!cm o*p.ctog mvr.13 c:r;-x47::s N6 80* AC".*TITT atacawf.:s _ P4 SF_ l ttDAAD $1 natt -- g l 38T18MD ST _ Ars W IETTW gars c,A,5 ) .. m U l l l l l -.. y,- M

0 75-o1 gC-o 6 W (o e l { i i j l

' -- WNSD CPSES WPT-8148 CTT%f g Westinghouse Water ReacttbJ."; wour omme,s o,,an Electric Corporation DMslons g ?. i em 3 q y g 9-3 p,,,55,,,,,,,,,,,,33,3g ,,,3 January 10, 1986 S.0., No: TXUJ-2004(Q) Ref: 1) Comanche Peak Mr. J. T. Merritt, Jr. Assistant Project General Manager Field Traveler fME

  • Texas Utilities Generating Company 248-5500 (Unit 2)
2) CPPA-48113 P.O. Box 1002 Glen Rose, Texas 76043 TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING COMPANY COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION Consideration for Acceptance of the Comanche Peak Unit fZ

Dear Mr. Merritt:

As requested in customer letter CPPA-48113, Westinghouse offers the following i considerations that fom the basis for acceptance of the Unit 2 Reactor Vessel j Support Shoe Side Gaps: i 1. The reactor vessel support shoe grows (thermally) slightly less than the l RV nozzle pad. Therefore, the required 0.020" (cold) side gap closes slightly to provide a small hot clearance. The remaining) hot gap is necessary to account for shim undulations (i.e., 2. warping, etc. due to machining, thus ensuring binding will not occur. 3. Once shims are installed, an average of the (4) corner gaps is determined and is considered representative of the installation. Past experience indicates that shim warping during nachining and shim alignment on the shoe can cause gap measurement inaccuracies. in excess of the 0.020" (cold) requirement Cold gaps which are slightly/ analysis of the reactor vessel 4. have no effect on the design support / reactor coolant loop system. 4 1

WPT_8148 J. T. Merritt, Jr. Based uponthe above, and a review of the data presented by Reference #1, t Unij 2 reactor vessel show side shim installations are found to be a i If there are any further questions or coments, please advise. Very truly yours. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTMC CORPORATION R. S. Howard, Manager WRD Comanche Peak Projects M.Torcaso/jjs/8682d:1 1L cc: J. T. Merritt 1L R. D. Cal der 1L J. W. Beck 1L C. B. Hartong 1L J. C. Kuykendall lt ARMS 1L J. B. George 1L R. A. J on es l t i

3 8s-o a I '5-6 8 WM 6 3 + e e u...< e.,, c e _ c e n, _ m a

f* I,, .n JM "'*A UNffE0 sfATES 4k NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION J-j ij. 'neocou av - 4 . 811 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SuffE 1000 ,,,,,j ARumorow.TaxAs noti - N10 9N 1 MEMORANDUM FOR: Eric H. Johnson, Director, Division of Reactor Safety & Projects /- THRU: T. F. Westerman, Chief, Reactor fety Branch Y FROM: Ian Barnes, Chief, RIV Comanche Peak Task Group

SUBJECT:

WELD R0D CONTROL FINDING -- NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-445/85-14, 50-446/85-11 (APPENDIX D) It was brought to my attention by Tom Westerman that Shannon Phillips had asserted that someone other than the inspectors had dropped a violation .regarding weld rod control from paragraph 7 of Appendix D of the subject report. In that I was the reviewer apparently alluded to in this assertion I believe it is apr opriate that I respond relative to the actual circumstances that. led to.the dropping of the citation. 1 1. On review of the report submitted by Shannon Phillips, I noted that he had closed out a previous unresolved item on weld rod control (446/8502-01) based on (a) :xtensive review of the subject by the NRC Technical Review Team, and (b) a Region IV inspection in the report inspection period which identified no violations or deviation. See document identified by Shannon Phillips as 3.b. page 57. When I reached paragraph 7 in my review I noted that a violation was identified regarding loose and missing labels on canisters of Sandvik electrodes. See page 81 in document identified by Shannon Phillips as 3.b. 2. I contacted Shannon Phillips and informed him that the report was unacceptable on this subject; i.e., closing out an unresolved item on weld rod control based, in part, on a current Region IV inspection showing no findings and then having a proposed violation on the same subject in the very same report. During this conversation, I told Shannon Phillips that either his unresolved item be left open if a violation was truly believed to exist. or the violation be dropped. In addition, I informed Shannon Phillips that I believed the proposed violation was somewhat questionable in that the Region IV inspector (Del Norman) stated in the report that the material was still identifiable. Shannon Phillips infonned me that he would discuss the matter with Del Nonnan and would then get back to me. 0unnAAn&f - v yowm t L_.--__-__.

. e" n. 6 s f ':t / -' lan Barnes 3. Shannori Phillips contacted me later and stated that he had discutaed the subject with Del Norman ano that they had decided to drop the violation. I told Shannon Phili1ps at that time 'that I did not want the subject dropped, in'that labels should not be coming loose from electrode canisters. I reconnended that the matter be referred to Brown and Root Welding Engineering for followup. This referral was then documented in the report. Subsequent to issue of the report I checked.with Shannon Phillips to assure myself that he had contacted Brow'n and Root on the subject. 7', y~ he answered in the affirmative. 4-t' 4. in-suurary, the violation was not dropped by "someone other than the inspectors," but rather by Shannon Phillips with the apparent agreement of Del Nonnan. I personally did not discuss the subject with Del Nonnan at any time. fm Sw.As Ian Barnes, Chief ( RIV Comanche. Peak Task Group f 1f I i .rr et / i e 7c J t r ) / ,~~ - - - - - --__- - _ - - - ___ -}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20237K454&oldid=5516970"