ML20237K052

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Info Re Comanche Peak Rept Review Group Requirements.Draft Memos from Jg Davis to Rd Martin Encl
ML20237K052
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 02/09/1987
From: Jennifer Davis
NRC
To: Martin R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML20237J194 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-87-87, FOIA-87-A-14 NUDOCS 8708270031
Download: ML20237K052 (5)


Text

__ __ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _

he L

s i

kSHC g

O UNITED STATES

+

E g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l

7.

j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

\\..../

g gg MEMORANDUM FOR: Robert D. Martin Regional Administrator, R-IV FROM:

John G. Davis, Chairman Comanche Peak Report Review Group

SUBJECT:

INFORMATION FOR COMANCHE PEAK REPORT REVIEW GROUP (CPRRG)

This is to acknowledge information you provided in response to our draft requests anticipating CPRRG requirements (Enclosures 1 and 2). We appreciate your prompt response and cooperation.

Documents you provided are listed in the register of documents received by the CPRRG (Enclosure 3). Please let us know if the Enclosure 3 listing does not agree with your records.

John G. Davis, Chairman Comanche Peak Report Review Group

Enclosures:

3, as stated

' cc:

G. Arlotto, RES C. Heltemes, AEOD C. Paperiello, RIII J. 1.ieberman, OGC i

D. Crutchfield, NRR R. Hartfield, IRM S. Collins, RI I

B708270031 870019 PDR FOIA B AU,MgB7-A_,14, PDR

(INFO FOR CPRRG - ku RIV-01)

DRAFT MEMORANDUM FOR:

Robert D. Martin, Regional Administrator Region IV FROM:

John G. Davis, Chairman Comanche Peak Report Review Group

.~

SUBJECT:

INFORMATION FOR COMANCHE PEAK OIA REPORT 86-10 REVIEW GROUP --'RG RIV 01 In order that the Comanche Peak OIA Report 86-10 Review Group (CPRRG) can proceed with its review, the following information concerning the Comanche Peak project since its inception is requested of you:

1.

A report on the extent to which the activities of Region IV at Comanche Peak covered the scope and requirements of the current IE construction inspection program (i.e., the IE inspection requirements).

It should be noted that this request covers the IE construction inspection program as now defined, not the program as it may have been defined at the time the activity was inspected (or should have been inspected) at Comanche Peak.

Also, the information relates to all inspection coverages by Region IV, regardless of the title given the inspection activity.

2.

The regional inspection activity described against each requirement of the IE program.

In sum, the CPRRG desires an expression of what inspec-tions, and the extent, that Region IV actually performed, in all its

~

aspects, against what the IE construction inspection program requires or describes.

3.

For each IE inspection requirement provide a reference to the Region IV document addressing the requirement, including the page(s) where the requirement is addressed.

DRAFT ENCLOSURE 1

Robert D. Martin, R DRAFT 4.

A listing of the IE construction inspection requirements ~which were not covered (and why) by Region IV.

If a requirement was only partially met, the report should so indicate and explain.

For any current program require-ments not met through Region IV activities, you are requested to determine whether the requirements in effect at the time of the inspection may have been different and, if so, please inform the CPRRG the degree to which the requirements in effect were met.

5.

A listing of the Region IV construction inspection requirements or act'ivities which are in addition to the IE program and why the items were added by Region IV. A reference to the relevant Region IV document conveying the requirement or activity should be provided including the relevant page number (s).

6.

A copy of the inspection reports and related correspondence concerning enforcement or management issues or the relevant pages for each of the items or activities which Region IV inspected which are a part of the IE construction inspection program.

If you have any questions concerning this request, please promptly contact the CPRRG.

Your reply should be received by the CPRRG by January 20, 1987.

John G. Davis, Chainnan Comanche Peak Report Review Group l

l I

1 (INFO FOR CPRRG -- RG RIV-01)

DR FT ENCLOSURE 1 j

I

w.

(INF0 FOR CPRRG - ku RIV-02)

DRAFT MEMORANDUM FOR:

Robert D. Martin Regional Administrator, R-IV FROM:

John G. Davis, Chaiman Comanche Peak Report Review Group

SUBJECT:

INFORMATION FOR COMANCHE PEAK OIA REPORT 86-10 REVIEW GROUP -- RG RIV-02 In order that the Comanche Peak OIA Report 86-10 Review Group (CPRRG) can proceed with its review, the following information is requested of you j

concerning Region IV inspection reporting; item identification, classification and disposition; and inspector responsibilities:

1.

Infonnation--regardless by whom developed--which establishes the responsibilities of the inspector, supervision, and management with regard to inspection performance, reporting, revi m and concurrence on reports and meaning and responsibilities of signatures and concurrences.

{

2.

Information that Region IV has which identifies means to resolve differences of opinions or positions with regard to inspection performance and report content.

3.

Information that describes the possible classifications of findings or conclusions from inspections and the meaning of the classifications in terms of safety significance, " attention" or Regional follow-up given to items because of classifications, conclusions regarding licensee performance, and enforcement. What the CPRRG seeks is information used by Region IV staff that identifies the significance of differences in classification of items or findings from inspections. The CPRRG is especially interested in distinguishing between differences based on procedural requirements from those based on safety concerns and whether

  • i such differences result in different Regional handling and follow-up actions.

4.

Information that describes how Region IV intends that findings and items from inspections be " resolved" with regard to safety significance and significance to the licensees performance.

5.

The system or method used by Region IV to assure that appropriate Region IV staff members were aware and understood the information in Items 1-4, above.

i i

DRAFT ENCLOSURE 2 i

W 2-0 RAFT Robert D. Martin, RIV' 6.

A copy of appropriate documents or relevant pages which address the above matters.

If you.have any questions regarding this request, please promptly contact the-

. CPRRG.

Your reply should be received by CPRRG by January 9, 1987.

l John G. Davis, Chairman Comanche Peak Report Review Group I

i

\\

(

l I

1

'I l

1

-i i

i i

j i

(INFO FOR CPRRG -- RG RIV-02)-

DRAFT ENCLOSURE 2

..q

-