ML20237J608
| ML20237J608 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 01/06/1987 |
| From: | Jennifer Davis NRC |
| To: | Arlotto G, Heltemes C, Paperiello C NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20237J194 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-87-87, FOIA-87-A-14 NUDOCS 8708260235 | |
| Download: ML20237J608 (3) | |
Text
_ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
(
[f] O 500lW
!jI January 6,1987 g l'-
f f
0/
I p
l' (I)p/
NOTE T0: Guy Arlotto, Comanche Peak Report Review Group 7
Jack Heltemes,' Comanche Peak Report Review Group Carl.Paperiello, Comanche Peak Peport Review Group 0
'FROM:
John G.' Davis
?
I
SUBJECT:
TASKS FOR EXAMINING THE 34 ISSUES OF ATTACHMENT 1 TO ATTACHMENT MM 0F OIA REPORT 86-10 The attached describes, in draft form, the task of developing information relative to the 34 issues of Attachtrent I to Attachment MM of OTA Report 86-10..
We should discuss this on Wednesday, January 7, 1987.
John G. Davis
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
R. Erickson J. Lieberman 1
l
)
9708260235 870819 l
rJAUMANB7-A-14
i i;l J0:%.@ O l'; Pa7' 0
-.. ] l l. - }
}
l DRAFT #1 JG0 avis:bsp 1/6/87 TASK FOR EXAMINATION OF THE 34 ISSUES OF ATTACHMENT 1 TO ATTACHMENT MM 0F OIA REPORT 86-10 1.
For each of the 34 issues listed in Attachment 1 to Attachment MM of OIA Report 86-10.
j a.
Safety Significance (1) Analyze the issue and describe its safety significance to the Comanche Peak reactor assuming that the condition of the issue is as stated in OIA Report 86-10.
The purpose of this analysis is to specify the " worst safety case" that may result assuming that the issue exists as stated without correction or recognition that the adverse situation exists, that is, as if it existed and i
was undetected.
In this analysis, provide appropriate references that serve as the basis for determination of safety significance.
(2) Analyze the actions which were taken or which are planned to be taken to alleviate any safety significar.ce associated with each of the 34 issues at Comanche Peak.
In this analysis, give references to reports and other documents that serve as the basis for determining the actions taken or planned and their effort in alleviating concerns.
Evaluate the actions to assure whether they alleviate or review safety concerns.
If the actions taken or planned do not alleviate the safety concerns, describe actions which, if taken, would alleviate the concerns. Give references in support of opinions or conclusions regarding corrective actions.
b.
Process and Dispositions (1) Analyze each issue and describe the process by which it actually was handled. This relates to its identification as an inspection
" finding" (or other result of an inspection), classification as to significance or non-compliance status, and ultimate resolution. This analysis should show (with appropriate references) the item from the point of identification by the inspector, inclusion in field notes, and draft reports to the final report.any any trading or monitoring system used by the inspector, supervisors, or the Region to maintain awareness nf the item and its status.
For these items where there is an absence of agreement on process and disposition, identify the basis for the disagreement and any record of disagreement and its i
(
processing. Particular attention should be given to signatures I
and concurrences and timeliness of these signatures and concurrences in relationship to changes in documentation.
Fn m og rm.w
.~
M30$50 PSEE[h l
3 l' (2) Analyze each issue and independently describe the process and disposition by which the item should have been handled..
Reference the guidance or practice that was used in making this independent detennination. Compare this independent determination with the handling and disposition that actually occurred. Where there are differences in the process and 4
disposition between what independent determination describes and what actually occurred, explain the differences.
Reference reports, guidance, practices that provide the basis for these explanations.
2.
In this examination of the 34 issues, access to reports, reports and documents pertinent to making the determinations should be performed as necessary. Also, information can be obtained as needed from knowledgeable individuals.
Such information should be in writing or, if by interview, a record of the interview is to be maintained.
-_