ML20237J434
| ML20237J434 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 01/21/1987 |
| From: | Jennifer Davis NRC |
| To: | NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20237J194 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-87-87, FOIA-87-A-14 NUDOCS 8708260164 | |
| Download: ML20237J434 (4) | |
Text
,
3__ _
a DFAFT #3 CPRRG MEETfNG 1/16/8 RErickson/bc 01/P}/87 t"
)l g
6 g [6j MEMO FOR: : File '
a g
FROM:
Jchn k., Davis, Chairman Comanche Peak Report Review Group (CPRRG)
SUBJECT:
CPRRG MEETING, JANUARY 16, 1987 The Comanche Peak Report Peview' stoup (CPRRG) met in the 9th Floor Con-ference Rcom (989), Willste Building, at 9:00 AM on. January 16,.1987.
Attendees: were: John Davis, NMSS; Bob Erickson, NMSS; Lawrence Chandler, OGC; Guy Arlotto, RES; Carl Paperiello, RIII; Stuart Treby, OGC; ilack Goldberg, 0GC; ard Jack Heltemes, AE00.
C HIGHLIGHTS 0GC Brb fino on Comanche Peak 09C representatives briefed the CPRRG on the Comanche Peak proceedings which began in 1979, noting that " contention 5" emerged as (rnd remains) the (jprincipalissueinthehearingprocess(copyattached).
The tomanche Peak proceedings were considered routine until 1982, when " limited appearance
<i statements" raised new questions.
Reports of NRC special inspections (by the i'
Special_ Investigation Team and Construction Assessment Team) also raised issues, As realt, the Hearing Board issued a memorandum and order recuiring the applicant (TUGCO) to address certain quality assurance issues.
In 1984,
}
4 the NRC established a special staff group to focus on quality assurance issues atqaterfordandComanchePeak.
Following a petf tiener's request for issuance 3 of a stop work order, NRC dispatched a special inspection team from Pegion II
['whichreviewedthequalityofconstructionatComanchePeak. The NRC also
'(
d3tabljshed 6 lechnical Review Team to look into allegations concerning Comanche PeakQdengagedacontractor(EG&G)toassistinassessing,theworkir.genviron-ment et C!manche Peak from the perspective whether a pervasive climate of " harass-ment and intimidation" existed which could adversely affect construction quality.
If A[the same time, NRC's Office of Investigation looked into individual instances Wg cN'a'ileged intimidation independently, i
8708260164 B70819 DRAFL PDR FOIA BAUMANB7-A-14 PDR
CPRRGMEET!NG1/16/8b DRAFT #3 RErickson/bc 01/21/87 The OGC briefing included discussion of the Comanche Peak licensee's Response Team Program Plan for responding to issues.
"Results reports" are being issued as the licensee completes segments of work on the Response Team Program Plan.
It is expected that the Comanche Peak licensing proceeding will focus, in future, " gely on the Response Team Program Plan and its implemeta-tion.
The following documents were received from OGC during the briefing:
CPRRG-10 Memo. Dircks-to-Office Directors, 3/12/84,
Subject:
COMPLETION OF OUTSTANDING REGULATORY ACTIONS ON COMANCHE PEAK AND WATEPFORD CPRRG-11 Memo.
Dircks-to-Office Directors, 10/17/84,
Subject:
COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT DIRECTOR CPRPG-12 Letter to TUGCO, 9/18/84,
Subject:
COMANCHE PEAK RE';IEP CPRRG-13 Letter to TUGCO, 11/29/84,
Subject:
COMANCHE PEAK REVIEW CPRRG-14 Letter to TUGCO, 1/8/85,
Subject:
COMANCHE PEAK REVIEW Organizing Task Groups The Group discussed possible candidates to lead the respective task groups.
It was agreed that draft final task statements would be provided for review by task group leaders as soon as they were designated. The CPRG considered holding joint discussions with Task Group Leaders, possibly on 1/23/87, concerning their respective tasks, organizations, approaches, schedules, etc.
Chairman John Davis will work with appropriate NRC managerrent to appoint Task Group Leaders as scon as possible.
Markup of Draft Task Statements The three draft task stttements were reviewed and marked up by the CPRRG.
Revised drafts will be sent to intere:;ted persons including those designated as Task Group Leaders.
DRAFT i
'CPRRGMEETING1/16/8kJ DPAFT 03
_, f_'_,
RErickson/bc F
01/21/87 Query to OGC The CPRRG intends to write to OGC, for information concerning any NRC agency policy and practice relating to processing and disposition of inspection findings. This information is particularly pertinent to Task 2.
Search for All Pertinaat Documents The CPRRG intends to ask others to review its list of documents received to date so that any additional information deemed pertinent can be promptly identified and obtained for review, Pro.iect Schedule The Group agreed on a proposed schedule, for work of the CPRRG and its Task Groups, aimed at producing a draft report for the EDO about February 20, 1987.
O I.
DRAFT
CPRRGMEETING1/16/8k j
DPAFT #3 PErickson/bc.
01/21/87 Received from L. Chandler (0GC) 1/16/87 I
Contention 5 1
The Applicants' failure to adhere to the quality assurance / quality control provisions required by the construction pemits for Comanche Peak, Units I and 2, and the requirements of Appendix B of 10 C.F.R. Part 50, and the
- construction practices employed, specifically in regard to concrete work, mortar. blocks, steel, fracture toughness testing, expansion joints, placement of the reactor vessel for Unit 2, welding, inspection and testing, materials used, craft labor qualifications and working conditions (as they may affect 0A/QC) and training and organization of QA/QC personnel, have raised substantial questions as to the adequacy of the construction of the facility.
As a result, the Conmission cannot make the findings required by 10 C.F.R. 50 57(a) necessary for issuance of an operating license for Comanche Peak.
(Emphasis added.)
i l
ENCLOSURE to Minutes of CPRRG Meeting 1/16/87 DRAFT
^
-_ __ __-________ _ _;