ML20237K056
| ML20237K056 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 02/09/1987 |
| From: | Jennifer Davis NRC |
| To: | Taylor J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20237J194 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-87-87, FOIA-87-A-14 NUDOCS 8708270033 | |
| Download: ML20237K056 (4) | |
Text
,
b~
s ucy qk,.
UNITED STATES
[
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 7,,
'l W ASHINGTON. D. C. 20555
\\*****/
FEB 9 27 MEMORANDUM FOR: James R. Taylor, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement g
FROM:
John G. Davis, Chainnan Comanche Peak Report Review Group
SUBJECT:
INFORMATION FOR COMANCHE PEAK REPORT REVIEW GROUP (CPRRG).
'This is to acknowledge information you provided in response to our draft requests anticipating CPRRG requirements (Enclosures 1 and 2). We appreciate your prompt response and cooperation.
Documents y2a provided are listed in the register of documents : 1ceived by the CPRRG(Encic.,ure3). Please let us know if the Enclosure 3 li ning does not agree with your records.
l John G. Davis, Chairman Comanche Peak Report Review Group
Enclosures:
3 as stated cc:
G. Arlotto, RES C. Heltemes, AEOD
)
C. Papuiello, RIII J. Lieberman, OGC P. McKee, IE D. Crutchfield, NRR
)
- 5.. Hartfield IRM l
S. Collins, RI 1
1 j
8708270033 870819 l
BAUMAN87-A-14 PDR J
I l
b L
Y (INFO FOR CPRRG RG IE-01)
DRAFT MEMORANDUM FOR: James M. Taylor. Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement FROM:
Jchn G. Davis, Chairman Comanche Peak Report Review Group l
SUBJECT:
INFORMATION FOR COMANCHE PEAK OIA REPORT 86-10 REVIEW GROUP RG IE-01 In order that the Comanche Peak OIA Report 86-10 Review Group (CPRRG) con proceed with its review, it needs information on what constitutes the current IE inspection program at a reactor under construction and what, if any, specific provisions or modifications were made for Comanche Peak. Thus, the following information is requested:
1.
A description of the current scope and specific requirements of the IE inspection program that is to be accomplished by the NRC at a reactor under construction today.
Please identify any requirements that are not expected to be implemented or where there is flexibility regarding implementation under the control of the Regional Administrator and the rationale for such determinations.
2.
Were any specific additions deletions or modifications made to the IE inspection program as it was to be applied at Comanche Peak?
3.
The description of the scope and requirements should be as definitive as practical in terms of the required actions, such as the items to be inspected, skills to be applied, the expected schedule for inspections,
" hold points," " readiness reviews," the " depth" of inspection, the size of " samples," etc.
In sum, the requested information is that which will inform the CPRRG of the inspection program required and expected to be performed by the NRC at a reactor under construction.
If you have any questions concerning this request please promptly contact the CPRRG.
Your reply should be received by the CPRRG by January 9,1987.
John G. Davis, Chaiman Comanche Peak Report Review Group cc:
CPRRG Members Region IV Noonan DRAFT ENCLOSURE 1
(.
DRAFT i
MEMORANDUM FOR: James M. Taylor, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement I
FROM:
John G. Davis, Chairman Comanche Peak Report Review Group i
SUBJECT:
INFORMATION FOR COMANCHE PEAK OIA REPORT 86-10 REVIEW GROUP -- RG IE 02 In order that Comanche Peak OIA Report 86-10 Review Group (CPRRG) can proceed with its review, the following information is requested of you concerning inspection reporting; item identification, classification, and disposition; and, resident and regional inspector responsibilities:
1.
Information that IE has which establishes the responsibilities of the inspector, supervision, and management with regard to inspection performance, reporting, review and concurrence on reports, and meaning and responsibilities of signatures and concurrences.
2.
Information that IE has which identifies means to resolve differences of opinions or positions with regard to inspection performance and report content.
3.
The possible classifications of findings or conclusions from reports and the meaning of the classifications in forms of safety signif'cance, conformance to procedures, " attention" or follow-up given to icems because of classifications, conclusions regarding licensee performance, and enforcement. What the CPRRG seeks is information that identifies the significance of differences in classif ication of items or findings from inspections rufficient to separate procedural from safety concerns and whether such differences should result in different handling and follow-up actions.
4 Information that describes how IE intends that findings and items from inspections be " resolved" with regard to safety and procedural significance and licensee's performance.
5.
A copy of relevant documents which address the above matters. The information provided in 1 through 4 above should include appropriate references to applicable documents.
6.
A copy of any headquarters directed team activities, such as an AIT report, involving Comanche Peak.
DRAFT ENCLOSURE 2 l
(
James M. Taylor DRAFT if you have any questions regarding this request, please'promptly contact the
- CFRRG, Your reply should be received by the CPRRG by January 9,1987.
. John G. Davit, Chainnan Comanche Peak Report Review Group i
s I
I l
i a
i.
I
DRAFT ENCLOSURE 2 l
l l
l
- _ _ _ - - _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _