ML20237J273
| ML20237J273 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 02/26/1987 |
| From: | Chandler L NRC |
| To: | Noonan V NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20237J194 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-87-87, FOIA-87-A-14 NUDOCS 8708260093 | |
| Download: ML20237J273 (1) | |
Text
- - _ _ _ _ - _ -
Y,
/
~
/
February 26,1987
/
l
_1
/
Note to:
Vince Noonan l
/
Trom:
Lawrence J. Chandler I
l
SUBJECT:
SUPPLEMENT TO BOARD NOTIFICATION RE: CIA REPORT l
I recently learned that the attached memorandum from Sharon Connelly to i
Victor Stello, dated January 6, 1987, which contains a revised chart for j
l pages 34 and 35 of the Comanche Peak OIA report, was not provided to NRR.
It would appear that since the Commission released a redacted version i
of the OIA report on December 11, 1986 which contained an edited form of l
this chert (before the attached rc. visions were received), the corrected chart i
likewise should be released after appropriate deletions have been made; a supplement to the original Board Notification would be an appropriate vehicle.
In preparing the Board Notification, OIA/should be requested to make the necessary deletions, e.g.,
deletion of names, es was done in the case of the k
original chart.
Also, Joe Touchard, OPA, should be informed and given a copy of the edited version when the Board Notification is issued.
I
\\
Lawrence Chandler Atta ent A=
ated
'N w/ attachment:
Y G. Arlotto v
/
h lud cc w out uiiscimie
/
N J. Keppler N
C. Grimes J. Fouchard T. Rehm J. Goldberg 8700260093 070019 PDR FDIA DAUMANB7-A-14 PDR
T, UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
5 WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 I
~
i C
January 6, 1987 MEMORANDUM FOR: Victor Stello Executive Director for Operations FROM:
Sharon R. Connelly, Director Office of Inspector and Auditor
SUBJECT:
OIA COMANCHE PEAK REPORT Attached is a memorandum from Mr. Stephen Goldberg in which he advises me that the chart on pages 34 and 35 of the Comanche Peak report does not accurately characterize the analysis of technical issues he performed to determine whether Region IV management appropriately downgraded, changed or deleted inspection findings and violations. Mr. Goldberg's complete analysis, which is included in the report, remains unchanged and there is no effect on the conclusions of the report.
i W ( r:!f SharonR.Connelly,Direc1Ior Office of Inspector and Auditor i
l
Attachment:
As Stated-cc: Commission (5),w/ attach J. Fouchard, PA, w/ attach C. Kammerer, CA, w/ attach T. Scarbrough, ASLAP, w/ attach Y
i i
I
%[ f
--( j (y h,, p se ~ ~ t
).
v
e T. -
U
/p* ** coq %,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION UNITED STATES
- j. '
3q g
W ASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 g,.
l g
~
\\ *.,e$ * ]
l December.11,.1986 MEMORANDUM ~FOR: Sharon R. Connelly, Director Office of Inspector and Auditor I
Stephen Goldberg, Technical Assistant FROM:
Office of Inspector and Auditor CORRECTED TABLES IN THE COMANCHE PEAK
SUBJECT:
INVESTIGATIVE REPORT Per our conversation, I have attached corrected copies of two tables that The appear' on pages 34 and 35 in the Comanche Peak Investigative Report.
This was due to my underlined words in the attachment are the corrections.
changing Tom Scarbrough's analysis of my work (Attachm j-Phillips' issues.
i change the thrust of the report.
l I was unable to review these pagej prior to the report being finalized becaus 21, 1986, when these tables'were I
I was on leave during the week of November
' developed and when the final review of the report took place.
Attachment:
r Corrected Tables F
l 6
er 4
I i
?k
/
p x-t s
r w V s.3..
y
T..
4 h-r.;t +
PAGES 34 & 35 Scarbrough,.
Goldberg i
1 Inspection geport 85-07/05 I.
~
Inconclusive' Inconclusive Concerns 1 nd 2 s
Reactor Vessel Installation Inconclusive Inconclusive Concern 3 Audit of Reactor. Vessel Installation No Violation Inconclusive Concern 4 l
. Spool Piece Marking-2 Questionable No Problem in Concern 5 Cement Mixing Blades-Handling of Handling of Violation Violation Inspection Report 85-14/11 Concerns 1, 2, and 3 Questionable Inconclusive on concern 1 ana z.
Records Shipment to Stone Questionable on and Webster
/
Concern 3.
Inconclusive Inconclusive j
Concerns 4 and 5 Records Shipment of CB&I t.
1 Questionable Inconclusive Concern 6 Temporary Storage of Records 4
Inspection Report 85-16/13 2 and 3 Questionable
~ Inconclusive Concerns 1,55(e) 10 CFR 50.
Questionable Inconclusive Concern 4
[
~NAMC0 Switches Not Properly Identified Refer to IE; Refer to IE; Concern 5 Inconclusive Inconclusive BISCO Seals Inconclusive - There was insufficient information to determine 1
whether a violation was appropriate.
Questionable - There was sufficient information available to 2
cite a violation.
WMH'f"
.z.a
=wa;.;;;azza;- :- c----
.; +
..$f. *,'.
a 1
II.
' l'
/
- 1 t
1 e.
' E q
d sawwu__
l Ib Problem In 1
Handling violation Inconclusive or stionnable_
-tb Violation 0
9
- ]
7 Scarbrough p
j I
1 14 Goldberg j
1 1
'I
'i
/
4 W
4 W
4 J
e e
e
\\
W.
1
_...___.________.______m