ML20237J453
| ML20237J453 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 01/08/1987 |
| From: | Jennifer Davis NRC |
| To: | NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20237J194 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-87-87, FOIA-87-A-14 NUDOCS 8708260176 | |
| Download: ML20237J453 (3) | |
Text
- - _
w UMf5 L
v
.ce=nx n u k
CPRRG MEETING 1/7/87 DRAFT #1 d4g.4+o RErickson/bc h
01/08/87
.L-MEM0 FOR:
FILE FROM:
John G. Davis, Chairman ComanchePeakReportReviewGroup(CPRRG)
[
SUBJECT:
CPRRG MEETING, JANUARY 7, 1987 The Comanche Peak Report Review Group (CPRRG) met in Room 970, Willste Building, at 11:00 AM on January 7, 1987.
Present were John Davis, t! MSS; Guy Arlotto, RES; Jack Heltemes, AE0D; Jack Goldberg, 0GC; and Robert Erickson, NMSS. Carl Paperiello, RIII, participated via telephone.
HIGHLIGHTS Current Status of Effort Although formal Commission approval has not yet been received in writing, preliminary planning and information gathering are proceeding.
Information received from the NRR Comanche Peak Project Office was distributed to CPRRG members.
IE and RIV are also assembling information for the CPRRG.
Inspection Program Benchmark The Group discussed RIV's suggestion that the CPRRC compare NRC's Comanche Peak inspection accomplishments to an all-inclusive construction inspection benchmark rather than limiting the comparison to QA-related matters. The Group endorsed this concept. The draft CPRRG memorandum to IE (RG-IE-01) will be revised to ask that they prepare an inspection program benchmark covering the full construction inspection program (not just the QA parts).
DRAFT 8700260176 a70819 PDR FDIA BAUMANB7-A-14 PDR
(
CPRRG MEETING 1/7/87 2
DRAFT #1 RErickson/bc 01/08/87 Draft Statements of Work The Group discussed draft task statements for examination of the technical issues raised in OIA Report 86
These tasks cover both a technical review (for safety significance) and a review o~f the process by which the issues were handled. CPRRG members were asked to review and comment on the draft task statements.
Tkt u e b
( _... #1 '_
Subgroups to Analyze Information for the CPRRG kg M
t.Tu cPng a4 The CPRRG endorsed the idea of forming three subgroups to carry out pecific tasks which would be defined by the CPRRG. The first subgroup would compare NRC's Comanche Peak inspection activity to the IE-defined program benchmark.
The second subgroup would perform h tecL11 cal {c?# tr fr #'cr:0) review 4
of issues raised in OIA Report 86-10 The third subgroup would review the abye of A process by which the issues were hand ed. The CPRRG.ould draft statements of work and schedules for the subgroup ta sks.
Several NRC staff members were named as possible candidates to head t1e respective subgroups. CPRRG Chairman 1
I John Davis intends to discuss this apr roach and the candidates with the EDO.
w w a. G n A"1fy M v p RIV Comments on Draft CPRRG Menos l
The Group approved all RIV proposed revisions to its draft memos (RG-RIV-01 i
ur" d and 02),
c Tkg, Cf M Procedural Matters It was agreed that the CPRRG final pro uct should take the form of conclusions
\\
supported by rationale and explanation c' : 9.
It was suggested that the two j
RIV staff persons, who were writing up independent analyses of the issues raised in 0IA Report 86-10, be given an opportunity to coment on the CPRRG's conclusions. The Group agreed that it would rely upon der rc-ted recor If I
it becomes necessary to seek additi nal information through interviews, ey l
should be rer.orded and transcribe for the record.
D R.A F T
<w wr m.
f' f:
TIME NM DATE CONVERSAYl'ON RECORD 4:45 PM 1/8/87 0 VISIT O CONFERENCE
@ TELEPHONE
@ INCOMING
' l
'"I Location of Visit / Conference:
O ouTGolNG NCME OF PERSON (S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT l ORGAN!ZATION (Office, dept.. bureau, TELEPHONE NO"
~-' Davis, NMSS l
WITH YOU
etc.)
gg ~ q Paul. Check R-IV FTS-728-8222 SUBJECT Paperiello, RI II COMMENT ON DRAFT RECAP OF CPRRG MEETING HELD 1/7/87 Lieberman, 0GC
SUMMARY
Paul Check comented on the last paragraph of our draft meetinq notes, which mentioned that two R-IV staff persons were writing up independent analyses of the issues raised in 01A Report 86-10. Mr. Check noted that three separate
~
analyses were being prepared--one by Mr. Phillips, one by Mr. Norman and one representing the views of R-IV (being prepared principally by Mr. Westerman).
l ACTION REQUIRED inform CPRRG N AME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION SIGNATU DATE ACTION TAKEN I
CPRRG informed by copy of this conversation record.
SIGNATUR
\\
TITLE DATE
!- [
l l
1/9/87
"#73~303 CONVERSATION RECORD g l0,NAL Q M jg E
- z i :us o. m.ut em E
F
..-