ML20237J447
| ML20237J447 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 01/20/1987 |
| From: | Jennifer Davis NRC |
| To: | NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20237J194 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-87-87, FOIA-87-A-14 NUDOCS 8708260172 | |
| Download: ML20237J447 (4) | |
Text
CFPRG MEETING 1/16/87 -
DRAFT f2 a.'.__
RErickson/bc
~
01/20/87 MEMO FOR:
File FROM:
John G. Davis, Chairman Comanche Peak Report Review Group.(CPRRG)
SUBJECT:
CPRRG MEETING, JANUARY 16, 1987 The Comanche Peak Report Review Group (CPRRG) met in the 9th Floor Con-ference Room (989), Willste Building, at 9:00 AM on January 16, 1987.
Attendees were: John Davis, NMSS; Bob Erickson, NMSS; Lawrence Chandler, OGC; Carl Paperiello, RIII; Stuart Treby, 0GC; Jack Goldberg. 0GC; and Jack Heltemes, AE0D i
HIGHLIGHTS l
OGC Briefing on Comanche Peak OGC representatives briefed the CPRRG on the Comanche, Peak proceedings f y /,< t s t a e v. e which began in 1979, noting that " contention 5" emerged as the principal issue v
in the hearing process (cepy attached). The Comanche Peak proceedings were considered routine until 1982, when " limited appearance statements" raised new questions. Reports of NRC special inspections (by the Special Investigation Team and Construction Assessment Tesm) also raised issues, As result, the Hearing Board issued a memorandum and order requiring the applicant (TUGCO) to j
address certain quality assurance issues.
In 1984, the NRC established a
{
4 special staff group to focus on quality assurance issues at Waterford and j
Comanche Peak.
Following a petitioner's request for issuance of a stop work g
order, NRC dispatched a special inspection team from Region II which a!"md the quality of construction at Comanche Peak. The NRC also established a TechnicalReviewTeamtolookingoallgagonsconcerningComanchePeakand
)
engagedacontractor,(g),to tgw rking envgogrit at Comanche Peak from the perspectiveYof "harahment and intimidation""which could adversely affect construction quality.
At the same time, NRC's-Office of Investigation looked into thB nitw independently.
,E.,.i L i.,/.( ju.tTs w~.y 't 4 [b> a al-.1xs{N.u Wa [,,,
r 8708260172 070019 0PAFT PDR FOIA BAUMAN87-A-14 PDR r~
~'~'W
CPRRG MEETING 1/16/87 J
DRAFT 02 RErickson/bc 01/20/87 The OGC briefing included discussion of the Comanche Peak licensee's Response Team Program Plan for responding to issues.
"Results reports" are being issued as the licensee completes segments of work on the Response Team Program Plan.
It is expected that the Comanche Peak licensing proceeding will focus, i future, largely on the Response Team Program Plan and its implemeta-tion.
The following documents were received f om OGC during.the briefing:
CPRRG-Nn, Letter to TUGCO, 9/18/84,
Subject:
COMANCHE PAEK REVIEW
, ~~
CPRRG-J 3 Letter to TUGCO, 11/29/84,
Subject:
COMANCHE PEAK REVIEW [
(d D
p CPRRS-M//
Memo. Dircks-to-Of Directo s, 10/17/84, Subjec [
. t.3
$ :i \\ )
's COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT DIRECTOR CPRRG-13'/ /
Letter to TUGCO, 1/8/85,
Subject:
COMANCHE PEAK REVIEW 7 ~
CRidf~lO Nbvno. bU ~ b ~h 3/'No l
i C<stfwy]mt e/= tu Ds4G AWGUM'WTAcn0 Arf OV CeMwig ftG44.
,wi> wAn.Wsep The Group discussed possible candidates to lead the respective task groups.
It was agreed that draft final task statements wculd be provided for review by task group leaders as soon as they were designated. The CPRG considered holding joint discussions with Task Group Leaders, possibly on 1/23/87, concerning their respective tasks, organizations, approaches, schedules, etc.
ChairmanJdhnDaviswillworkwithappropriateNRCmanagement to appoint Task Group Leaders as soon as possible.
Markup of Draft Task Statements The three draft task statements were reviewed and marked up by the CPRRG.
Revised drafts will be sent to interested persons includina those designated as Task Group Leaders.
D P. A F T
.s=.._
CPRRG MEETING 1/16/87 DRAFT d2 RErickson/bc.
01/20/87 Query to OGC_
]
1 The CPRRG intends to write-to OGC, for information concerning any NRC-agency policy and practice relating to processing and disposition of
...y;;;'on inspection findings. This information is particularly pertinent to Task 2.
Search for All Pertinent ' Documents The CPRRG intends to ask others to review its list of documents received to date so that any additi,nal information deemed pe.rtinent can be promptly identified and obtained for review.
Project Schedule The Group agreed on a proposed schedule, for work of the CPRRG and its Task Groups, einied at producing a draft report for the EDO about February 20, 1987.
i l
l DRAFT 1
~
g :
CPRRG MEETING 1/16/87 b DRAFT 02 PErickson/bc 01/20/87 Received from L. Chandler (0GC)'1/16/87 Ccitention 5 The Applicants' failure to adhere to the quality assurance / quality control provisinns required by the construction pennits for Comanche Peak, Units'1 and.
2, and the requirements of Appendix B of 10 C.F.R. Part 50, and the construction practices employed, specifically in regard to concrete work, mortar blocks, steel, fracture toughness testing,. expansion joints, placement of the reactor vessel for Unit 2, welding, inspection and testing, materials used, craft labor qualifications and working conditions (as they may affect QA/00) and training and organization of QA/0C personnel, have raised
. substantial questions as to the adequacy of the construction of the facility.
As a result, the Commission cannot make the findings required by 10 C.F.R. 50.57(a) necessary for issuance of an operating license for Comanche Peak.
(Emphasis added.)
ENCLOSURE to Minutes of CPRRG Meeting 1/16/87 DRAFT
.