ML20237J761
Text
'4.'
g l,
, $1;
~
- *
- c. g 'c p5 UNITED $TATES e
~4 l'
v ai NUCLE AR REGULA10RY COMMISSIOf4 -
.,s ht *
,E i
wn motoN, p. c. rosss h {(.
i w
j w
FEB 13 57 f
s fiEMOPANDUM F0P: Victor Stelloa Jr.
Executhe Mrector for Operations Guy A. Arlotto, Chairdn FROM:
o Comanche Peak Report Review Group (CPRRG)
SUBJECT:
C08ANCHE PEAK OIA REPORT 86-10 REVIEW GROUP The purpose of this' memorandum is to present the CPRRG's plan ior accomplishing
't i tasts, outlined in your memorandum dated January 21, 1967.
l'n performing our review, we will rely ;1rincipally on the 01A Report 86-10 and information subtritted to the CPRRG. The CPRRG will not duplicate the OIA effort but will request information, review records and documentation, and intWview as needed to perfomfits mission. We have organlzed four working groups er en aid in accomplish >no the following assigned t;.sks:
.l_
1.
IDENTIFY TPE SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ISSUES IDENTIFIED IN OIA REPORT 86-10.
The GF.RG rill specifically address the safety significance of the identi-fied.4 sues and the need for additional action, if any.
2.
DETERMINE WHETHER THE ISSUES IDENTIFIED IN OIA REPORT 86-10 WERE APPROPRIATELY HANDLED AS TO PROCFSS AND DISPOSITION
]
The CPRRD will address tihis aspect as an integral part of its report. The CPRRG rept;rt will deal also with whether an item was appropriately categor-ized within the IE report system and how the item wcs dispositioned, as documented in the record, 3.
DETER?lNE WHETHER TiiE CURRENT ADOiE'NTED REVIEW AND INSPECTION EFFORT AT COMANCHE PEAK IS SUFFICIENT TO COMPENSATE FOR ANY IDENTIFIED WEAKNESSES IN REGION IV'S QA INSPECTION PROGRAMS.
t d.
The CPRRG will use the existing IE construction inspection program as the standard against which the efforts at Comanche Peak will be 3s b
y compared. Consequently, the CPRRG will not identify the IE inspec-tion requirements that existed at various times during the Comanche
.s Peak process, t
b.
The inspections actuall.y performed by Region IV of those activities n]...
and items at Comanche Peak will be compared against this inspection G
program in terms of inspection objectives or coverage.
B-'0026u305 070819 PDR POIA D AUgAt481-A-14 PDR
i i
i 7
V. Stello 1 1
The inspections actually performed by the Comanche Peak Project Office c.
anc any other elements of NRC (such as inspections managed by IE Head-quarters, NRR, or other Regions) and the Comanche Peak Response Team will also be compared against this inspection program in terrs of inspection objectives or coverage.
q i
d.
The CPRRG will ' provide a judgment whether the inspections actually performed result in an inspection coverage at Comanche Peak sufficient to compensate for any identified gaps in Region IV's 4
inspection programs.
l J
e.
The CPRRG will not review the technical findings of the inspection progrer, actually performed and thus will not comment upon the adequacy of the IE construction inspection program or the quality of the plant.
I 4
REVIEV TFE PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF NRC FORM 76f The CPRR5 will review the purpose and significance of NRC Fonn 766 and make appropriate recommendations concerning its use.
l In addition, the CPRRG will address the following-5.
JUDGPENT ON BROADER IMPLICATIONS IN REGION IV j
Without expanding the above four specific tasks, and based upon the j
record, the CPPRG will offer its judgment on whether it is likely that t
there are broader implications in Region IV, beyond the Comanche Peak l
plant.
I i
Your memorandr, of January 21, 1987 requested a report by February 20, 1987.
I We expect to have the relevant information collected by then. However, we J
request additionel time, ur.til March 13, 1987, to allow fnr adequate research and documentation of the issues and overall evaluation and integration of the findings into a suitable final report.
Unless I hear from you, I will proceed on the as mption that our proposed scope and course of action as stated above, is atisfa tory.
/N uy A. Arlotto, Chairman Comanc Peak Report Review Grcup
1 i
l FEB 131987 J
CPPPG CHARTER f
Enclosure:
List of Principal Participants
)
and Schedule cc:
T. Murley, RI i
J. Keppler, RIII P. Martin, RIV E. Beckjord, RES W. Mcdonald, IRV.
J. Taylor, IE H. Denton, NPR R. Scroggins, IRM C. Paperiello, R!ll C. Heltemes, AE00 J. Lieberrian, OGC J. Goldberg, 0GC R. Erickson, NM55 l
P. McKee, IE
- 5. Collins, RIII D. Crutchfield, f,'PR R. Hertfield, IPE l
I 1
1
{
i j
i i
)
't FEB131997 COMANCHE PEAK OIA REPORT 86-10 REVIEW GROUP (CPRRG)
Principal Participants Guy A. Arlotto, RES, Chairman Clemens J. Heltemes, AEOD Carl J. Paperiello, R-III James Lieberman, OGC Jack R.'Goldberg, OGC Legal Advisors Robert A. Erickson, NMSS Coordinator Phillip F. McKee, IE, Leader Inspection Assessment Task Group Samuel J. Collins, R-I, Leader Issue Handling and Process Task Group Dennis M. Crutchfield, NRR, Leader Safety Significance Task Group Richard A. Hartfield, IRM, Leader 766 System Review Group l
Schedule
[
Complete Issue Handling and Process Task February 10, 1987 l
Complete Inspection Assessment Task February 13, 1987 Complete Safety Significance Task February 17, 1987 Complete' 766 System Review Task February 17, 1987 Assemble and Integrate Information February 27, 1987 Verify and Augment Information March 6, 1987 Complete Final Report March 13, 1987 l
ENCLOSURE
\\
.__ _-______- __ - -