ML20236B726

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on D Bernreuter Draft Rept Re Plant
ML20236B726
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon, 05000000
Issue date: 04/20/1976
From: Maccary R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Gammill W
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20236A877 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-87-214 NUDOCS 8707290213
Download: ML20236B726 (2)


Text

. . - - _ _ _ _ - . _ _ - _

,, i

,i i i \

l APR 2 01976

_ s n

! William P. Gammill, Assistant Director for Site Technology,.

I Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis COM1ENTS ON DON BERNREUTER'S PROGRESS REGARDING DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR i

POWER PLANT With respect to Carl Stepp's note of April 1,1976 which transmitted Don Bernreuter's (LLL) draft report reparding Diablo Canyon to the SEB, and your review of Don Bernreuter s efforts transmitted in

, your memorandum to me of April 1,1976; we wish to provide the following -

i remarks on your summary of results. Our connents follow the same

sequence (1 through 4) which you employed.

l 1. The fact that there is no strong relation between the ratio

u/a and a is not surprising. In " Statistical Studies of Verti-cal and Horizontal Earthquake Spectra" by N. M. Newmark Consulting Engineering Services, dated January,1976, prepared for the Division of Systems Safety, USNRC, the same conclusion was made.
2. The comments regarding the relationship between u and a reported by Mr. Bernreuter are also fairly well accepted. .Please note that for Diablo Canyon, since a site dependent response spectra nos used, we have already taken advantage of the information Mr. Bernreuter is providing. In other words his efforts (so far discussed) confirm what we have been doing, but do not contri-bute to any modification of our position.
3. The aforementioned reference (see item 1)'directly contradicts this finding. Specifically, Dr. Newmark was instructed to search '

for a dependence between intensity of shaking and spectral shapes. He discovered none. Since Dr. Newmark's werk was more comprehensive and t'etailed, we tend to trust him more. However  ;

we would be willin; to review this issue again. 1

4. We find this potentially as the most acceptable manner of showing I that the earthquake . hazard at Diablo Canyon is not as serious t

1 099tCs > ,

,UMM A M E > ,,,

o ATs > ......g.

9707290213 870721 * *"s**"""'"""'"""* " ' " ' ' ' " ' " * " "

h PDR CONNDR87-214 FOIA PDR V( ]  :

1

g .. 't Distribution:

Central File 4o l k'. gat 0ILL NRR-Rdg f a B76 M SEB-Rdg

as initially envisioned. If it can be shown that because of a fortuitous geological situation (presence of the mudstone layer) that earthquake accelerations at the surface are not likely to be as severe as originally estimated, it may be possible to discount the threat from the HOSGRI fault.

! Howevery,our discussions with Professor Newmark on Don Bernreuter's work indicated that the mudstone layer properties assigned by Don are not realistic, as 550' l of sandstone layer is present on tope of the mudstone.

l lI R. R. Maccary, Assistant Director for Engineering Division of Systems Safety cc: R. Heineman W. Gammill l R. DeYoung J. C. Stepp I. Sibweil

D. Allison K. Kapur J.,.0 '))ri en s.

1 l

i i

i 1

I 1

l i

- i

, . il i o,,,e , b5N@ h DSS:SEh DSS:SEB @,..

_@ 0:E

, , , , , , , , J0'Brien da KKapu M ISibweil RRMaccary.

oars > ..4. I,. .f/ 7b 04[IllB6 .4/P/76 AIMil6 l Forra AEC 318 (Rev. 9 53) AECM 0240 W u. s. novs RNM ENT PRIMitNG 0,FICEl 1974 92- 166

-,