ML20210U117

Notice of Nonconformance from Insp on 861215-17

ML20210U117
Person / Time
Issue date:	02/13/1987
From:	NRC
To:
Shared Package
ML20210U108	List: ML20210U104 ML20210U117 ML20210U188
References
REF-QA-99901072 99901072-86-01, 99901072-86-1, NUDOCS 8702180393
Download: ML20210U117 (2)

Text

i APPENDIX A Johnson Controls System Engineering & Construction Division - Midwest Docket No. 99901072/86-01 NOTICE OF NONCONFORMANCE Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted on December 15-17, 1986, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in accordance with NRC requirements.

Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 states: " Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings. Instructions, procedures, or drawings shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for detemining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished."

Nonconfomances with these requirements are as follows:

1. Section 1, " Policy Statement," of Johnson Controls System Engineerina &

Construction Division (SECD) Quality Assurance Program Manual (QAPM),

Revision 2 conunits SECD's QA program to confom with ANSI N45.2 " Quality Assurance Progran Requirements for Nuclear Facilities."

Section 3 of ANSI N45.2 states, in part, "The crganizational structure, functional responsibilities, levels of authority...for management, direction, and execution of the Quality Assurance Program shall be documented."

Contrary to the above, the responsibilities of 0A personnel and organiza-tional charts No. I and No. 2 described in Section 3 of the QAPM do not reflect the present QA organization for Johnson Controls (JC) - SECD in effect since May 1986. (86-01-01)

2. Criterion II of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 states, in part, "The program shall provide for indoctrination and training of personnel l

performing activities affecting quality as necessary to assure that

! suitable proficiency is achieved and maintained."

l Paragraph 3.2 of Section 3 " Organization" of the QAPM states, in part, "The following managers are responsible for setting required quality objectives within their own areas of functional responsibility, and for attainment of these objectives by those who have been assigned responsibility for perfoming the work. . .."

! Paragraph 3.2.1 of Secticn 3 of the QAPM states, in part, "The Project Manager (PM) has overall authority for execution of the project...."

h 9990107=.

_2_

Contrary to the above, the SECD could not provide docurentation that the PM for the Byron and Braidwood Projects had been indoctrinated and trained for activities affecting quality. (86-01-02)

3. Paragraph 5.3 of Section 19 " Audits" of the QAPM states, "After follow-up and successful corrective action, copies of completed Audit Reports are sent to the D0A [ Director of Quality Assurance] and the PM for review...."

Contrary to the above, Audit Report No. 60101 for the internal audit conducted on January 24, 1986 was not reviewed by the 00A for closeout.

(86-01-03)

.