ML20237F111

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NRC Operator Licensing Initial Exam Rept 50-223/OL-98-01 of Exam Administered During Wk of 980803-06.Exam Results:One RO Candidate Failed Two Sections of Written Exam & All Other Candidates Passed All Portions of Respective Exams
ML20237F111
Person / Time
Site: University of Lowell
Issue date: 08/11/1998
From: Doyle P
NRC
To:
Shared Package
ML20237A702 List:
References
50-223-OL-98-01, 50-223-OL-98-1, NUDOCS 9809020072
Download: ML20237F111 (2)


Text

-_-

I- '

t /

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l

[.

' OPERATOR LICENSING INITIAL EXAMINATION REPORT.-

REPORT NO.;

50-223/OL-98-01 l

1 i

FACILITY DOCKET NO.:

50-223 4

FACILITY LICENSE NO.:

R-125 l

FACILITY:

University of Massachusetts - Lowell i

. EXAMINATION DATES:

August 3 - 6,1998

^

EXAMINER:

Pa oyl lCh xamine j

7

. SUBMITTED BY:

i Paul Doyle, Chiepam,ip6r Date

]

i

SUMMARY

During the week of August the NRC administered Operator Licensing Examinations to six 1

license candidates, two candidates for SRO-Upgrade,.one Candidate for SRO-Instant and three j

candidates for RO. One RO candidate failed two sections of the written examination. all other candidates passed all portions of their respective examinations.

J 4

BEPORT DETAILS 1

\\

-1.

- Examiners-

'l Paul Doyle, Chief Examiner j

j 2.

J_e, suns:

R0 PASS / FAIL' SRO F' ASS / Fall TOTAL PASS / Fall f

Written 2/1 1/0 3/1

<4 Operating Tests 3/0 3/0 6/0 i

Overall 2/1 3/0 5/1 3.

L Exit Meeting:

{

Phul Doyle, NRC, Examinef 4

David Medich, Univ. Mass.-Lowell, Acting Reactor Superviscr a

l Leo Bobek, Univ. Mass.-Lowell, Reactor Supervisor Designate l

{

p The examiner re' orted that he did not observe any generic weaknesses. The p

u participants discussed the written, and the chief examiner stressed the need to expedite I

suLmittal of facility comments. The examiner thanked the facility staff for their support in coordinating the examinations.

. 930a020072 900812

?:'

i r(

PDR L

V

' ADOCK 05000223 I, PDR

Facility Comments on Written Examination Along with NRC Resolution 9

OM e

dWD e

e 4

e f'

~

.---