ML20207C647

Intervenor Exhibit I-State-40,consisting of marked-up Talking Points for Stello Meeting Re State of Nh Preparedness for Site

ML20207C647
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	05/26/1988
From:	AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
References
OL-I-STATE-040, OL-I-STATE-40, NUDOCS 8808100061
Download: ML20207C647 (2)

Text

FAv.13 'Es 15:50 TE*A M5 rEO C': : .0:

b0'~hh k'N V

y .

..' S/2 6/er y7 z= S44 -90 yJBnw O

Talking Points for Stello Meeting '88 JL 19 P6 :05 I. Seabrook - New Haapshire ggj, ,g, t DOCXEim A t A. Currently many reasons for the overall nagative bottom line on OfisNLH w rcr./g New Hampshire preparedness for the Seabrook site, kg

1. Beach Population Issues. Y QN p4 di,y [)

FIKA's view- In order to reach a positive evaluation of the 94 beach population aspects of the New Hampshire plan, FEMA believe that the sheltering issues / options must be fully considered in th I,g plans. r currently,'tihe'y E fbot7 A4 Ve' curiently afe thliig's'q,today,

~

t the sheltering survey is not sufficient to fulfill this requirement )ts because it is not a shelter plan. Dg. Vy )g ( t',

-RAC majority view. We understand that the majority of the RAC members (

believe that the beach aspects of the plan are adequate without y2 g any sheltering information. We consider the RAC advisory to us; we do not consider ourselves bound to adopt a majority view. yfj

2. Issues other than Beach. t

0. W'

- 55 deficiencies in the February 1986 exercise. k M areas N,.

r must be redemonstrated. $O [g/

ga m - A ,

- Other pfan lesues must be resolved ,e.g., transport tion , , heN /y

' resources iss ps , number of bus drivere,etc. - G IJ La.% y -

Q B. Shelter M survey Dt.y - See sti ch 4 ,

8 c6cw onology of eventstm ato>date. '} w ,i s.br  ; . (d  ; g valy 2 RAC agencies have resp >nded in writing. t hose comments k/

have been received (and FEKA M contactMen M, N' -

we will expedite the Argonne analysis 6 consolidation of comment ,

,V y[ and issue a technical assistance report. ,

.rama 3M 11. Seabrook - Massachusetts (Utility Plan) f" 2-

~ v .. r. n%.Q,

'A' fy..'

M 44v

,O ' , ' u hd 5 ,

t A "" W {'TX%T , a %) 98t

• h gO') A. Redacted Material - (og i etc. I y Lnem* kof e .s s Me tcry vwle

,TYt ,

-FDtA Geods material sp.y6uhd a positiv_e finding on a plan review g g The absence of the saterial would also affset the conduct of lq I g an exercise. We are trilling to abide by any protective order f New ui' .

issued by the Board.

-We' understand that NRC has received the materia 1 Agy,Wh at i s i t ssA4LLA4

[4 etW f cev*r di "***"' 147 h w w './ u.~. w me J lt,F 7 d!, <

.h m A.'M m.u %C*-

N' $ t 8808100061 880526

),. h PDR ADOCK 05000443 y e \g G PDR y .tg s gv V l

J

_ . . . . _ _ . - . - _ . ,, , , ,_,.__ - _ __, _,,-__y._. _. _ _-r- , _ _ _, _ - - _ , _ _ . _