ML20008D470

Intervenor Exhibit I-MAG-102,consisting of New Hampshire Yankee Div 880412 Ltr Forwarding Meeting Notes from 880401 Meeting at Plant W/Nrc,Fema & States of Nh & Me & Informing of Meeting on 880420 to Obtain Scenario Review Comments

ML20008D470
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	05/25/1989
From:	Gram G PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
To:	PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
References
OL-I-MAG-102, NUDOCS 9003050141
Download: ML20008D470 (10)

Text

1 - lM A $ -lO b So-WVQy V-R 7 uNc

/75 None swme W New Hemswee '90 JW 18 PS:08 New namesnire vannee Omsion .

Apr1lyitr[1M ([CRETARY 00CKL!*G 4 M HVICL id< ANCH Tot Distribution

Subject:

Antil 20. 1988 Scenario Review Hasting at Seabrook Station Enclosed are the meeting notes free the Aeril 1. 1984 setting at leabroot g Station between representatives of the Nuclear Regulatory Consission (NRC), the )

Federal toergency wanagement Agency (FEMA). New Hampshire Yankee (NNY) and tSe Itates of New Hampshire and Maine. Per agreement feathed at that meeting, an ene 4ise scenario esckage was submitted to the designated review personnel on April 11, 1988.

A seating to obtain the scenario review comments will be held by leabrook Station at the Generst Office luilding Media Crashics Conference Rosa at 10:00 AM on April 20, 1984. The meeting obiective(s) aise includet (1) r* viewing NRY's proposed representative sample formula and pennosed entent of elev numbers free a " Reasonably Achievable" point of viewt (2) negotiatine the final scenarie outline and espected player response: and (3) determining sitestone dates for submittal of the remaining esercise material and/or revisir.no to ~the esistine submittal content. Representatives of NRC, FEMA and the States of,New Masochire and Maine are requested to ar. tend, with review coesments and any specific questions relative to entent of play.

Should you have any questions concerning the April 20th meeting, elease contact Diane Sovino e. (603) 474-9*,M entension 3810. Your cooperation in this matter is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely yours, Ge u.k R. Crae '

/$ 7

.  ? utive Director of toersency Preseredness and Consunity Relations l

l-l' I

9003050141 890525 PDR ADDCK 0D000443 O PDR P O. 2 m 300. Seatirook NH 03874 . Teleonone (603) 474 9574

'e ErYRc!!t etJte!!vts & trTERT OF ptAY witTINC NOTT! l Aprt! 1 1988

~

I tevision !

. i CptWIWC REMARKS OBJECT!?tt s

1.

FEMA Region I has not initiated a review of the esercise oblectives of the States of Maine and New Nameshire. Mr. Thomas. NM RAC Chairman, stated that  !

a separate letter free each state transmittine the obiettives to FEMA tesion  !

I had not ocurred as of the meetint date. '

2. Mr. Donovan. Massachusetts RAC Chairman, stated that he had accostwd the sub-sittel and completed a review of the exercise obiectives of the New Moseshire Yankee Of fsite Response Organisation which were submitted initially on {

i February 12. 1988 and resubmitted on March 23. 1998 followine a revision made  ;

to conform to FEMA cuidance Memorandum (CM) EX 3 dated Februarv 26 le98.

3. Mr. Strome of New Hampshire Emergency Manseement Agency and Mr. Malenee of Maine Emergency Management Agency stated that they have endorsed the esercise objectives as stated in the transmittal letters. i

4. TEMA Region ! (Mr. Theses) acknowledged these statements (Mr. Strome's and Mr. Malaney's) as endorsements and agreed to review the State of NM and Maine esercise objectives prior to April 20. 1988. All parties acreed that a  ;

seeting would be held on April 20. 1988 to review the emercise scenario, the l entent of play proposed for each participating organisation, and the semeline  !

me*sodology which may be used to establish the esercise resources.  ;

5. NNY will take the ressonsibility to assist the States of New Haseshire and Malne in the issuance of transmittal letters to FEMA officially submittine the exercise objectives in reseense to Mr. Thonac' initial concern.  ;

6. NNY requested a move of the graded exercise date free May to June - no deci.  :

sien was made, i

7. FEMA Region I (Mr. Thomas) has stated in the past, it would not agree to i l

schedule an esercise until deficiencies and areas requirint corrective action l

associated with the State of New Haeoshire resoonse durine the Februarv 26.

1986 esercise were addressedt inadequacies free the NM olen were correctedt i j and the NR plan was updated to reflect Guidance Memorandue EV-2 and MS-l. .

i i

• rMr. Thomas issued a letter. dated March 31. 1988, to the State of New Heepshire stating that the content summarised those remaining insediments to  !.

en esercise. In tassonse to the transsittal letter, a follow-vo meetint was scheduled for Astil 11. 1988 at 10:00 PM between the State of MM Emereence Management Agency and FEMA Region I to address and resolve any deficiencies, i

l .

1 t

er/C;*

l I

L ._ . _._. . _ _ . - .- -. - - -- - - - - - -

r l .

3 EtttC!!! ctJte!!vts & EXTENT OF pt.AY MitTIMC Netts j

Apttl 1. 1988 Revision 1 i

MEETINC DAtt$

l

1. April 11. 1988 at 10 AM in Dick Strome's office between FEMA testen ! and l the State of New Haesshire. Purpose - to review ItMk's March 31st letter

and its impact on objectives.

2. April 20. 1988 at 10 AM in New Haneshire Yankee's General Of fice Buildine conference toes. Purpose - finalise scenario content, detailed entent of play and review the NNY proposed representative sanele formula.

Confirmation letter establishing this meeting will be coordinated by NRY.

EttRCISE LOC!STICS

1. NMY to subsit the esercise scenario outline to NRC as April 10. legg, (Later. NHY clarified that. since the date coincided with a Sundav the subsittal would be made on Aeril 11. legg.).

LEWCTR OF EXERCI5tB

1. All parties agreed to a two day esercise. The first dat will address the pluse espesure pathway considerations whereas the second day will address ingestion pathway concerns and re-entry ant recoverv.

1

2. The Massachusetts RAC Chairman escuested that NWT Offaite Rossense .]

Organisation. Statse of NM and Maine consider submitting a total toeula- 1 tien dose calculation 30-45 days after the esercise. The NM and Maine tac Chairman disagreed that this entent of play. (i.e.. serforming the actual ,

calculation) was required in order to satisfy the FEMA oblective, and he stated that this issue may require ItMA Headeverters direction. tuercise participant (s) look for a resolution of this issue erior to or at the April

20. 1988 meeting.

3. Meeting participants agreed that MS-1 Mospital and environmental lab anale-sis could be performed seearately free the seier event timeline used to con- -

i duct the first day exercise action. NRY stated that it, would consider the available options however. NRY raised the concern of what issect seearate

• schedules would have on issuance of the final esercise resort.

A. All meeting participants agreed to the following schedule of events in sus-Port of the current esercise date.

Day 1 - Evaluation Briefings i Day 2 - Plume espesure esercise Day 3 - Ingestion pathway esercise Day 4 - Work Day Evaluation and Review with FEMA Day 5 - Briefing for Participants in AM and Public in FM l'

or/850.1

i EXItcist etJECT!?ts 6 t! TENT OF PLAY MEET!NC NOTtt  !

April 1. 1988 Revision ! '!

l PAC!ttT!!$ FOR FYDERAL EVAtt'ATION lt!!FINCS, et!?!OfftS. AND Pt?lt!C NttTINCS FIMA will tae the lead in arrangements for critique location in coordination '!

with NMY. .v.f will vait for FEMA request for assistance.  !

ETTENT OF NRC CB8ttTATION or INCESTION PATWWAY I' NRC field sampling teams.

Region 1 observation vill be limited to the licensee's coordination of '

i EITENT OF MRC's PARTICIPATION IN tnt RIttCISE '

NRC Region I does not intend to olay.

t IDtMT171 CAT 10N OF !?Att'ATION AND INTttTENot 088ttTATION DUt!NC TMt t!!R t t

NMY vill propose a set of ground rules which regulate Evaluator and Intervenor access / conduct at each Emergency Response Facility or field location. FEMA  :'

eteted that the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Attorney Ceneral's of fice has requested a copy of the ground rules. NWY committed to providing e draft set at the April 20, 1988 meeting. f' PRIPARATION OF FIDERAL ETALUAft0N PACKETS NHY vill assist in the oroduction of FEMA eschets. The Massachusetts RAC Chairman vill stovide an outline or semele format to NRY at the end of the meeting. (NMY needs to determine if this assistance is required to sueeort NN ,

and Maine FEMA evaluations. Additionally, the Massachusetts RAC Chairman has been requested to provide a list of evaluator packases). '

TRANSPORTATION TO MAJOR FAC!ttT!!S i

FEMA and WRC will make their own arrangements. '

PtrBttC INTtt?tNTION IN PLAY If the public interferes with emergency response actions during the enercise.

NRY vill terminate the af fected area os position. The termination action will

, he documented by evaluators.

EtttCISE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL NMY tequested each organisation to assign a member as the organisation's point of contact. (See attached list of points of contact) 1 pr/850.2 I

1 l

N-.--- - - -m.-- ...--,. - _ - - , --~ -v- , - - - - - ~ -------n ,r- n - - - , .-

. f e  !

k EttRCISE clJECT!?t$ 6 tritNT OF PLAY MttTINC N0ft$

Aptti 1. 1988 Revision !

l EKTENT OF PLAY CDRTROL OF RetNARIO (free slay)

1. WMY stated that all free play will be interietted only by NHY esercise controllers. TEMA and NRC in agreement with fresplev eroposal. WWY ttated '

that it would provide a list of freestav options free which TEMA can choose the octual esercise event. NWY commit 44d that it would have proos available for all events listed.  ;

2. NMY committed to generation of a second scenario. TEMA recommended that the  !

second scenario can parallel the submitted scenario as lone as sufficient

" traps" were established within the outline.

REASONAltT ACR!! TABLE

1. FEMA agrees that some type of restesentative seestine saw be necesserv to help define reasonably achievable entent of play of resources for various functions. All participants agreed "in concept" with the Constraines to Reasonably Achievable White Paper presented by G.R. Cree (copy attached) which addressed what a ressonably achievable extent of play decision - t making process sight take.  ;

2. NRY vill define those ORD sositions requiring 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> staf fing at the Asril i

20. 1988 meeting. NNY and the States of NM and Maine will erosose what positions will demonstrate a shif t change within the exercise tiestine.

3. toergency situations or prearranged personnel commitments will take erece- I dance over exercise participation. Affected facilities will demonstrate that full emergency response could be satisfied throught the identification of those personnel / positions that would respond during an emergenev.

DETAtt,ED IITENT OF ptAY i

Notes of this section will anly be provided to the designated ooints of contact ,

to ensure confidentiality free players.

s or/850.3

U '

l l

CDNSTeathtt AND !NRLUt4ct! CW fXteC!!f EXTtWT CF e(Ay l NRC regulationb in 1:0M Part D. Acconcts E. MV.F.1 retutre "a f ul) tartici-

stien exercise =nten tests as muen of tne ... emergency elens as is ressensely acnteveale witneut mancatery suolic particientien." "Fv11 particitatien" in.

cluces testing the "tajor ceserveele perttentd cf tne plans ans mostlizatica of ersennel ane resources in " sufficient nuncers t:

restene to tne acticent s:enarie." As everycr.e isverify tne cassetlity to aware. the Ltcensteg tearc in tne $* eemem anien creceenteg issues an unortsetentes cettsten on Cecemoer ?. isnt e

't cetermines tPat tne 3,i gg f *.e., :esigni cf tne emergency gretartiness eme* *se reis twenty two mentns earlier ese act :: rely with those regulat:Py "etutrements reas:Psely in that it cia net test as mucn of tne u;.' : cffstte clan as .as acntevatie.

?hus, aitetut reacntag tre swastantive issue cf 6;'.::'s actuai state of cretarenness. tne lear: e*decttvely negate: scatns of efd:st 's

est;*.teg tre emer:tse :y FEMA. tne NAC staf f ano tre Lttensee, noe tne t .e anc res:.r:es escence: in c: serving, evaluating anc istigattng tne results

• inat emer: se. 8eger:

1ess cf anetrer tMe cecisten mas r*gnt er wrong, no one can

ssegree tmut f *te tee stanccctnt cf seatnistrattve eff dctency one use of rescurtes cf everycee involves, anat ccturret t's $5cetaam was a travesty.

• cesi*f. tssues regar: tag anet'er en exertise nas seen cesignec trecerly shoult to resc1vec Ltdsrs su:stanttal resources are investes ty all concernet. anfor.

tunately. tne NRC Cr: cess is net currently structures to allcw this t: cetur trice :: the currently senecules exercise.

atte-et t: The test that all of us can cc s t:

minist:e tre :cssittitty tnat we .511

=ni n is 1 ster founc t: :revent a succertasie c:nclusten scic an exe*c'se, tre test;n St regarcirg sne tresence er acteace cf "89ncoment: 1 **ans' 'n teace:ct t' er; enc'/ :) anning. *:ettrer tee sate

'd ests :f tne Fe eral ; ve-evnt, the '.t:ensees :P tee ve!': aout: se serve trat sncule anonen.

t attears t: us trat :ne t9:criant **gre *ent an en v ncstgnt sug;ests .as i

in s s t ?; *n tne Enerteam '.ittgat*cn .as a ei*-tecumentes. Icgicai :r cess y y' .

ani:n lear

ettsions .ere tace regarctng entent cf : lay one sasole st:es sa tant the

', coule unoerstano tne evolution of the exer tse cesign. In orcer to mini.

si:t tne cessibility of a suc:essful caallenge to the scose of the tenerecx ezertise. =e erosose t: aceroacn tne cecision mantng process analyttcally ty (1) scentifying-the canstraints one influences anten we all believe tssect  !

"ressensely acnieveale* extent of play ano selectten of stoole stres *:: setting the tounos on extent of clay ano samole sites en :ne casts of the *cefittfies

' ,ctnstesints ano (3) socumenting/ justifying in an ce;anizes manner cur sectston-saning process atta regare to these matters.

I we have identifies, as a starting potnt for our ctscussions. a nuncer cf ::n*

straints anc influences en extent of play ano sanele size selection. These are reflettee in the attact.ee matrix ano incluce (1) erschnel rescu ss availacle t: ecserveicents:1 the exeretse. Obvicusly, this c:nstraint accites creccainantly to Ft9A ane NRC staf f tersenhe

... ,... . i i

I I

()

Nees to sintet:e t*e rw2:er cf terscnnel one are away fece normal *ealta ano safety cuttes.

• its C:r.straint accides ecst immestately te telsce.

fire ano ctner e*eriercy rescencers amo atil te terticitette.g (3)

Nees te minimite t*t t*te away f r:m ncemel cuty stattens. This is a constratnt for all :artitteants.

14) e%ysteal limits en tre ewmeer cf exercise " events' =nich cne persen tan etterve one evaluate.

chiefly to Feeeral ;:verreent zersonnel.Once again, tats ts a ctestraint which (1) **e lack of cart *:':st en ey state Tne local avt crittes t* wessa: wsetts ano tre resultant :.estacns regarete.g legal autn:rity t: semenstrate certain assects of tre offsite clan. :n seestter., P.e taca cf tart':staa tien ty inesvicua; 83: tid faci 1*ttes, et:. I' ttes, e.g. , sc.3cols. :ay care centers, tee

• s i i

• • cact a "*easonaaly acnte.acle entent :f c.sy. j

'll

!:ctal.'etenemic t : acts aita regart : use cf tu lte f aca.*. .ites e.g. ,  ;

interference wstn : . t'.*: )

suca as tuses, smt.;a*:es..se arc:*:::

aeet 2 ate*eee vent.t: ass.re tr.at :w:lte rescurses  ;

me) emergency use, are *.ct cetstras f:P ett. anica are reece: f:P r.e r

• tetriment. exercise :wrt:ses :: tre cuelte (7) The nees t:

exercise. cretare ':r litigat*cn of issues relates tc tre 11111 cf t?.e There t.ws:

i of tiny one samele sa:e.:e a to ne.a. cal tesis f or tecisicms regarcing extent J this infiwence en exert'se cesign may arg e f tr -

exsansion of tBe e.-tea :f terstar.el ano events ::servec.

ae woulc secrettate ycur s.;;es1*:7.s *egarting metects in anica tre ateve :ectst '

Seat *g structure migrt : **: rove: src eny acet ticna*. ::nstritets/inf *we*ces ant:n

? 'a/itu may ene ' cent *s':e same;e *y d:-

trat 'tcact :n t*e entices 8i*. :f us swat mane en entent tre ;:::m* r; exe* tse.

t*e attsente ma'atx ati* a*.*:= ws 1: arr*ve at a ::rst :.? *.::e 's trat tre '.se =f sys ::P.ce**$mg exert'se testqn anten at'? att* star.: any :: tent's; sc?vttny t* tre f.eartegs yet : ::me.

l l

C/8K3t:8.2

~

l J

f t

EXTENT OF PLAY CONSTRAINT MATRIX  !

C=== ==n mecntun movato se , v. ra e se of u.wse t

u ressmmei nncatua no Cmesma,ew no cemses.m.

, Heseeseces se n c.msee '

emused ove oeservercovelves personnet see i Enetose 03sacched senseevers &

Evaevaeossi evasuasoss 23 Need see Sosne conseement no Consteame i i

personnes se Hess tweddo m Goe Some consee.eme end enemCKEun sease a encas

[

,' pessorm theer emmees eue se estis j personnet peeseew=4 (e g. heented onweewemce.I

{ steemal esealese & I poiss.e. hee hapseters i Saleer evees -  !

I a cmeswem.y can1 tse away resgiewissers) so e,e 1

l hem steemal duty away hewn neemat posts j edy poses we .any large neweissets i

3) Tom e issues e n Constraent see Consteamus see ORO Conse.m. ten sease Conseeame toe me.  ;

Eseecse - can1 ese SmCMEMA up personnes ser peesennel vetunesses & ERO - E escal personnes pery }

estended persoes 5 w

4) Phywcal sweises Constrasne ter no Consteawee No Consee.sme no Constranne en fiumber et events nfWR*44 - ,

and esercise aspeces twenes seesmape'e et any one person can events & aspaces observe & evassage that can ese nue [

I

5) tiesgation - Sampeo nHCKEMA sueusi feeY sueuse wicsosse Sease a tocae Maior secsease we MI.

sete ser observation increase obserwoes perseguest, ovesses se personnet nosese Ape persesweet se assene te 3. nessber of bessses es es adogmase assese adagnose f increased se assene adesquase sangee so be nesbsbred R sample sasapewig adesquete sampees esvens - nws una j espand she necessary nonihet of evenes .

l l

l

EXTENT OF PLAY CONSTRAINT MATRIX sc.ac.n es '

Conserasnt 9480C 4 E M A fe tv#0HO .4.we at Ne8 I  : ease of M.ane

6) Secsacticessenesc Conferasne for NHC#

Irapaces - Use of OsttY Sweancial FEasA is econenec Conseraines on esseng peo (ansee.asnt constements-hseneted pestenc facesseies to Putesc Facilities to hasus on snow nuescos sweeseed emeneens resenseces to nsn the entowsson et she sucts an essent as to agesides can put snee emeecese, pay los enterface w/putesc puenhc esevcise leases ecc use. use of petic l

resources le putelsc serenent leg; sying op armesulances that ,

are neeeed nor nornias eenergency esse) *

?) tach of legal  ? Me Constrawet Suessankas see censsea.no Aushonor - Lack of peo conseraent parDcepshen by constra~nes en ~

vaneus aspects ed schoses, day care centers, spammens eseetsse sesde as tacolspes, etc. . C7 1 ,3. ens l

• Actesal Waffic g

cetteral

- Ess acevasen

- Actual evne-el a sclosel l

W _. _ ._ . - -