ML20008D475

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Intervenor Exhibit I-MAG-106,consisting of FEMA 890221 Responses to Town of Hampton First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to FEMA on 880628-29 Exercise
ML20008D475
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/26/1989
From:
Federal Emergency Management Agency
To:
HAMPTON, NH
References
OL-I-MAG-106, NUDOCS 9003050167
Download: ML20008D475 (4)


Text

,

[- l14f$$ ~ /0$

so-yva/wv-K 5/ufry

~/

fa Teb 1989 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 90 JW 18 P4 :27 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION r

BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFEfY AND LICENSING EGARK Of SECRETARY pgcntilNG & SERVI E JUDGE IVAN W. SMITH, CHAIRMAN JUDGE RICHARD F. COLE JUDGE JERRY R. KLINE

+

3 In the Matter of

)

)

Public Service Co. of New Hampshire,

)

Docket No. 50-443-OL et al.

)

50-444-OL

)

Offsite Emergency (Seabrook Station, Units 1 & 2)

)

Planning Issues

)

)

I FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY'S RESPONSES TO TOWN OF HAMPTON'S FIP.ST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY.

ON THE JUNE 28-29, 1988 EXERCISE (" EXERCISE")

INTERROGATORY NO. 1; 4

i Identify all teachers who performed or participated in protective actions for school children during the Exercise.

For each, state; (a) The nature and extent of the participation or function performed; (b) The purpose of the performance or participation; (c) The school (s) for which each teacher performed or participated; (d) The section(s) of the NHRERP or SPMC tested or exercised; t

(e) Whether in-FEMA's opinion the performance or participation was adequate, and the basis for that opinion; t

(f) Whether a log, record, or other documentation concerning the Exercipe participation was prepared by or on behalf of each teacher; (g) Identify and produce all documents upon which you rely to answer,

this interrogatory.

9003050167 890526 PDR ADOCK 05000443 C

PDR MNb IDh

l

  1. .o

~,

h 9

RESPONSE NO. 1:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) did not observe or evaluate the participation of school teachers in the exercise of offsite emergency response plans for Seabrook Station held on June 28 and 29,1988.

_It was not the purpose of the exercise to evaluate their performance.

FEFA considers schools and day care centers to be part of the general population who were not required to take part in the exercise. The extent of play for this exercise was agreed upon in advance by the States of New flampshire and Maine, New Ilarpshire Yankee Offsite Response Organiiation (NifY ORO), FEMA, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and was intended, in part, to l

demonstrate thet the State of New flampshire and the N1!Y ORO had the capabilityI to notify schools of the existence of an emergency, to communicate protective !

action reconaendations or decisions, to ascertain whether the schools or day care centern required assistance in the form of buses for their children, and to d'eliver that assistance when requested.

The extent of play did not call I

for school children to be sheltired, boarded on buses or evacuated.

Neither did it call on school personnel to respond to exercise messages, The exercise was designed, in part, to test the State's compeasatory actions in the event of noncooperation by schools.

l l

I I_N_TERROGATORY NO. '2:

Identifya$1"administratorsandschoolpersonnelotherthanteacherswho i

Performed or participated in protective actions for school children during thei Exercise. 'For each, state:

).

i TN nature and extent of the participation or function performeds (a) i (b) The purpose of the performance or participation; l

FEMA *h Response to Toll's First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Prodcution on the June.1988 Exercise, Page 2.

  • f[

.,/

/ ' (.h/ '

l f

(c) The school (s) for which each administrator and school personnel performed or participated; r

(d) The section(s) of the NHRERP or SPMC tested or exercised; (e) Whether in FEMA's opinion the perfornance or participation was {

adequate, and the basis for that opinion; t

(f) Whether a log, record, or other documentation concerning the Exercise participation was prepared by or on behalf of each teachers (g) Identify and produce all documents upon'which you rely to answer this interrogatory.

- t RESPONSE NO. 2:

i for the reasons explained in Response No.1, TEMA did not observe or j

i evaluate the performance of school administrators or other school personnel in carrying o'ut protective actions for school children.

INTERROGATORY NO. 3:

I Identify all employees, agents, representatives, cnd contractors of thei St4te of New Hampshire who, during the Exercise, performed or participated in protective actions involving school children, for each, statet (a'

The nature and extent of the participation or function performed;

~

\\

(b) The purpose of the performance or participation; l

I (c) The school (s) for which each administrator and school personnel l

r performed or participated; (d) -The section(s) of the NHRERP or SPMC tested or exercised; (e) Whether in FEMA's opinion the performance or participation was adequate, arul tpe basis for that opinion; l

I (f) Whether a log, record, or other documentation concerning. the Exercise participation was prepared by or on behalf of each employee, agent,!

representative or contractor of the State of New Hampshire.-

{

(g) Identify and produce all documents upon which you rely to answer f*

this interrogatory.

PEMA's Response to TOH's First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Prodcution on the_ June 1988 Exercise, Page 3.

j