ML20008D486

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rejected Intervenor Exhibit I-MAG-117,consisting of Form 9.1, Emergency Drill/Exercise Controller/Evaluator Audit Form, for 1988 FEMA-graded Exercise W/B Musico,Observer
ML20008D486
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/15/1989
From: Bruce Musico
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
References
OL-I-MAG-117, NUDOCS 9003050242
Download: ML20008D486 (7)


Text

---

r-ittne- //7 9 bed

  1. wa wwoc k/5/f7 I

Page ofU C

FORM 9.1

'90 JW 18 P4 :40 EMERGENCY DRILL / EXERCISE. CONTROLLER / EVALUATOR AUDIT FORM VFicf 0F SECRETARY (88-03-037-EX) hacena 4 spW1

!mANCH Bruce Musico 1988 FEMA Graded Exercise 06-28-88 rver:

Name Drill / Exercise Cate Drill / Exercise

Title:

1988 FEMA Craded Exercise

,)

location of Observer:

Brentwood EOC (New Hampshire)

Observed:

Player Function All EOC staff members All EOC positions (refer to sign-in sheets)

Overall Performances (Cross reference comments to specific objective)

Objective 1 -- Partis 11y met.

Broke down at General Emergency.

i Obiective 2 -- Fully met.

Went very well.

Obinetive 3 -- Partially met.

Second shift weak /disoraanised/ untrained.

Obiective 4 -- Fully met.

Redundancy of radio and tale, messages confusing.

Obiective 5 -- -Fully met.

Copy enchine operation marginal; tequires repair.

Obiective 6 -- Not met.

Road Agent not issued dosimetry. Police unfamiliar with use at TCP.

Objective 16 - Fully met.

Simulated K1 use not demonstrated. Was issued with dosimetry.

1 Objective 18 - Not met.

No follow-up on call-backs to tran.p. dependent upon evacuation.

Obiective 19 - Not met.

Lack of coord. with IFO regarding school children disposition.

Obiective 20 - Partially met.

TCP set-up acceptable.

Iown did not initiate ars other times.

Obiective 34 - Not met.

Mechanics of shif t-change we:.K.

Lacked trained Znc. shift.

t Other:

Prescribed messames simulatina ad hoc calls to EOC for transportation assis-tance were on at lease three (3) occasicastncorrect in detail.

For example.'

one message said an address was D Roswell Rd -- (1) there is no Roswell Rd.

l in Brentwoodt there is a Rowell Rd.. (Z) None of the homes in Brentwood have anntfie street number addresses.

Details of messames should be confirmed in advance of a drill to ensure accuraev to maximise drill training effectiveness.

Also during the Exercise there were three (3) real emergency events that occurred j

Inese consisted of two EMS calls for an ambulance to the Rockinaham Cty.

and one appendicitus) and a firc call to the Swasey School (false alare). Jail (one seizure These coincided with many ongoing key scenario events (see timeline) and caused great confusion.

EOC activities never fully recovered to a smooth functioning operation.

- FUd to on several occasions prompt participants to expedite shif t-change activities; prio Controller (Musico) discussion and approval of the FEMA observer (Larry Robertson - Lead NH EOC FEMA Observer.

for all towns) was obtained.

activities planned.

It was necessary in order to accomplisb6 b'-58' """ '

' ' Signature Date 90030D0242 890615 PDR ADOCK 05000443 O

PDR M/KK4192 lD4 ( p

d e

{

.e

^*

Page }_ of [J FORM 9.1 EMERGENCY DRILL / EXERCISE CONTROLLER / EVALUATION AUDIT FORM (Continued)

'l B. Musico Name (print) i Recognized deficiency:

(Note Objective and Criteria Number) eCr A 'L L Communication Process Comments: Objective 4 -njRedundant transmittal of information to the EOC from CD radio and Irv LocaA Liaison on the telephone. There was an ever i

chantina time delay between same messages from each.

Usually, the two messages would be slightly different in content. Overall communications capability between j

the Brentwood EOC and the IFO (Local Liaison) was very good. Notet during the critt ue participants indicated that the delay between the two sources of informa-tion switched.

Prior to the shift channe the IFO Local Liaison was usually later,;

while af ter the shif t change the CD radio message was later.

The cause of this is unknown.

W W A4 *1 V C M ) b l. hic inditLd be hM tnebit ra Hte

.A +%

WI wha a e, a 6 A C' e A M

'Tehs1_m i Asti Recommendations for Improvement (Specific):

Communication Process Comments:@ Determine source and significance of dual messages

-to the local EOC. While it provices a good source of redundancy, the frequent inconsistancies also create confusion.

Resolve any problems, and possibly clarify in the IFO's procedure.

l 1

1 I

n

.1

(

hh %bhmM' H~ E6C. $190 % 4 Y.< Wm.

W 0114uah H AS 4ft antL&4A lana.

A lre lekrmk t'

., R ec T a F J o N ala 1 L 11dbs j

W hai - Esc n u m % r.

fyjg 06-28-88 i

/ Signature Oste i

I M/KK4192.1

.d 1

.f e

)

Page 1 of Q FORM 9.1 EMERGENCY DRILL / EXERCISE CONTROLLER / EVALUATION AUO!T FORM

)

(Continued)

8. Musico Name (print)

. Recognized deficiency:

(Note Objective and Criteria Number)

None. Went well. (see objectives 2 and 5)

Facility Activation Comments:

.)

I

\\

~

Recommendations for Improvement (Specific):

None.

Facility Activation Comments:

06-28-88 M gnature Date M/KK4192.2

tf Page of $

FORM 9.1 EMERetNCY DRILL / EXERCISE CONTROLLER / EVALUATION AUO!T FORM l

(Continued) i-B. Musico Name (print) l

(** - see below for cross ref.)

Recognized deficiency:

(Note Objective and Criteria Number) l Adherenc$nstructions f rom the CDD.to Plan / Procedures Comments: I1) Radef Off. did n]

per It was issued at General Emergency. (2) Police / Security j

tamiliar with Traffic Management Manual. (3) Dosimetry not issued to Road Agent m

prior to dispatch to TCP. (4) Activation of TCPt3 (simulated) at evacuation order for t

arentwood not conducted. (5) Siren activation and EBS messana verification -- Civil l

"efense Dir. did not inform IF0/ EOF which means of oublic notiffeat4nn uara success-tully activated in Brentwood (i.e.. stren/ tone alert radio /ERE broademata). The time Ior Siren activation, and for EBS broadcast was POSTED at 1210 hours0.014 days <br />0.336 hours <br />0.002 weeks <br />4.60405e-4 months <br /> on F==reency' Log l

l status board (paper sheet - large). Additionally, an earlier discussion of cointing i

)

one or the town sirens toward a road not serviced by the evacuation routes. This decision was not later discussed in licht of announced miran acefumeinn.

(6) Radiolo-gical monitorina of personnel was too fast.

It norn. ally avermand annrer. 23-35 secstds.

Monitoring technicues t'are also vesk. (7) Thera van a imek o' enred4nmH an regarding scnool children. At one r,oint Selectran recommended to Swasey School a centinuation of normal bus di~smissal. Later the Transp. Coord. dispatched a bus (wave A) to the school.

(wave A bus assianment chanmed to bus routes by controllari.

Cava R h,,. later on cispatenec to Swasey School. Coordination with IFO should have occurred regarding School activities.

(8) The overall initiation and implementation of a shif t change was weak.

Participants unaware that State of N.H. could also supply local EOC staff if asked.

Recommendations for Improvement (Specific):

Adherence to Plan / Procedure Comments: Additional trainina in procedure use and various response activities (identified above).

  1. " OBJECTIVE Cross-Reference for areas identified above:

Conusent No.

Obiective No.

Critaria No(a).

(1) 6 1.3.6.12 (2) 20 5.11.12 (3) 6 1.3.5.6.10.11.12.

(4) 20 1

(5) 18 10.11.

(6) 6 12 (7) 19 1.5,7 (8) 34 t L. 'i. 7 06-28-88

' Signature Oste M/KK4192.3 j

4 l

I Page[of[

I FORM 9.1 EMERGENCY ORILL/ EXERCISE CONTROLLER / EVALUATION AUDIT FORM (Continued)

B. Musico Name (print)

Recognized deficiency:

(Note Objective and Criteri,a Number)

Objective 5 - b )Copy :2 chine worked poorly, i

Equipment / Facility Layout Comments:

(see crie=ria Numher 2)

/t) i s

- V3 Wt Mk te b m ah s A. d. 1,Tftk_

vwM R LtL4 *h t M thL r

e l 'T? t

  • AR

~

rs E 'TT. P wa, F -T L-41

+T mH9H twr uk-W emL w \\hMr i

M h LLs_ m ' A ke. Pab mWyhr am M arve+,

u a

!I

' R: commendations for Improvement (Specific):

0) Service EOC copy machine (or replace).

\\

l Equipment / Facility Layout Comments:

'n

/

, o a

/L1 FMurt all LEAt JP1 nd n& at4 GC a,14. cc/fra%d /Ja inWei.

'obier ur r Crchrin 7

(

s

/ 7)

LY% actdema # Tcp 4 Aa r -

s

'/

iaisuM C. m4MA AJ J i fefireM to Crikris a ff (A }

'ffhs<

06-21 1i

' STgnature Date

~

M/KK4192.4

O Pagekof e

FORM 9.1 EMERGENCY ORILL/ EXERCISE CONTROLLER / EVALUATION AUDIT FORM (Continued)

B. Musico Nome (print)

Recognized deficiency:

(Note Objective and Criteria Number)

Training Comments:

Training comments provided on " Adherence to Plan / Procedure" section of this evaluation.

4 Recommendations.for Improvement (Specific):

Training Comments:

1

~

I I

i l

1 l

i 8

gm 06-28-88 Signature Date M/KK4192.5 l

l k.