ML20155J526
| ML20155J526 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palisades, Big Rock Point, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 10/21/1988 |
| From: | CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20155J513 | List: |
| References | |
| CPC-2A, NUDOCS 8810260265 | |
| Download: ML20155J526 (28) | |
Text
l ATTAClefENT 2 Consumers Power Company Big Rock Point & Palisades Plants Dockets 50-155 & 50-255 l
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCRAM DESCRIPTION (CPC-2A)
October 21, 1988 27 Pages OC1088-0168-NLO2 GG10260265 G81021 PDR ADOCK 050001*a5 P PDC
AITACHMENT 2 QCALITY ASSLTULNCE PROGRAM DESCRIPf1ON (CPC-2A)
Revision 7 Revision 8 Reason for Gange Basis for Conclusion 1
Statement of Responsibility and Statement of Responsibility and Authority Authority First Faragraph: First Paragraph:
As O* f Executive Of ficer of As mief Operating Of ficer of ) Corporate restructuring created The ultimate authority for Cor , s Power Ccurpany, I have Consumers Power Company, I have the position of Chief Operating establishing the QA Program the natinate management authority the ultimate management authority Of ficer, which is functionally has not changed.
for the establishment of Corporate for the establishment of Corporate equivalent to Chief Executive Quality Assurance... Quality Assurance... Of ficer so far as resource commitment is concerned.
2 Second Pararrsita: Second Paragraph:
I have delegated the authority for I have delegated tne authority for Title thanges in management The positions, responsibilities the establishment and maintenance the establishment and maintenance positions. No change in and authorities with respect of the Quality Assurance Program of the Quality Assurance Program relative position or to QA are not altered.
Drscription to the Executive Vice Description to e' a Senior Vice I responsibilities regarding QA.
President, Energy Supply for President, Enery Supply for gerational phase activities and operational phase activities ~td plant modifications, and in turn plant modifications, an/ in turn to the Executive Director, Nuclear to the Director, Quality Assurance.
Assurance. The Executive The Director, Quality Assurance is Director, % clear Assurance is also authorized to verify the also authorized to verify the effective implementatfor of the ef fective implementation of the Quality Assurance Program Quality Assurance Program Descriptton.
Descriptton.
3 Approvat Page Approval Page Executive Vice President, Senior Vice President, Energy Title change and reorganization. The responsibilities for Energy Supply Sqply The Senior VP-Energy Distribution progrse execution and Seator Vice President, Energy (Not included for Revision 8) is not included since the VP- approval have not changed.
Distribucion Distribution Operations approves Vice President, Fuel Supply (Not included for Revision 8) the document and he is the only element of Energy Distribution involved in nuclear plant sup, sort.
The VP-Fuel Supply is no longer included because responsibility for nuclear fuel supply has been transferred to the VP-Nuclear Operations.
MIO9S8-0110A-TPOl 1
ATIACIMENT 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION (CPC-2A) .
Revision 7 Revision 8 Reason for Otante Basis for Conclusion .
4 Pages t v ,1,7, R ,9,13,14,17,18,21, Pa ee s t v ,1,7,8,9,13,17,18,21,24, 24,25,29,41,43,44,46,55,60 2 5, M,41,4 3,44,46,5 5,60 "Nuclear Assurance Department
- On these pages the title of the Reorganization and name change. He responsibilities and "Executive Director, Nuclear "Nclear Assurance Department" was he Nuclear Assurance Department, authorities of the QA Assurance" changed to the "Quality Assurance consisting of QA, Nuclear Safety Department have not Department." On some pages the and Corporate Health Physicist, changed. he Director, organization head's title is also was reorganized and the position QA occupies the same changed to "Director. ,Nality of Executive Director eliminated. organizational position Assurance." he QA Director now occupies a with respect to the QA similar position with respect to Program as did the reporting relationships, and Fxecutive Director
- retains all QA rerponsibilities Nuclear Assurance.
fornurly part of Nuclear Assurance (including site QA).
5 Pace 1 Pare 1 f+c t ton 1.1, 3rd Paragraph Sectinn 1.1, 3rd Paragraph QAality assurance functions Quality assurance functions Clarifies the type of QA func- "QA" functions continue to (as defined above) are performed (audits, surveillance, certain tions which must report to the be performed by personnel by personnel within formally reviews and control of this QAPD) Director, QA. H is change, and in the QA Department. Some designated Quality Assurance (QA) are performed by personnel within others which follow, are intended functions formierly in the organizational units. Specific formally designated Quality to allow plant management to QA Department are now plant areas of responsibility and... Assurance (QA) organizational perform review of procurement responsibilities, but the units that report to the documents for QA aspects, and to requirements to be met
...QA/QC functioits at EM Director, Quality 14surance. perform vendor socitoring and have not been altered or nuclear plants are performed by Specific areas of responsibility receiving inspection functions. reduced.
onsite quality assurance and... This change was discussed with orga.1 rations that report to the Region Ill ERC personnel prior Executive Director, Nuclear (tast sentence from Revision 7 to implementation.
Assurance. deleted) i 6 Pc 1 Page 1 Sec t ion 1. 7.1 Section 1.2.1 President and Qau f Executive President and Chief Operating Title <_hanges. See Items 1 and 2.
Officer Officer Executive Vice Pre sident, Senior Vice President, Energy Energy Supply Supply l
MIO988-0110A-TP01-QA06 2 i
l
2 T f r e-ns ia d
e 3
N o oenli hgs. w g E d- - gabn- d r .
nt . l edngiaioue de ay N asd orearsgst oc emtht Q oe rirhonrn rn b rnci A n spg t uec o o o yh a i oe rfrwi l
T o e n n qt t p pt tl T i i ea oel ynsAsi l creob A s thh cral eeQerei sef ni u it c nrr roce e pf s l l oonoe t f wnst ar hnv d edin isn c ift t ne n
n boo eef oenuiu sb o i n t ,bhindial s n Ane C ss ct Td na p oo oa nee ene setdmd it
.ic r oiv oev .aipenon t t f
o pt a sma eehdt nd eraca ceda=
nuez!
sih eaonnyes er rr unri!
i s ros h n uschiiot rt hct utt ii ui fii n t uah s et o t ond aetl sd enqgt
- a hui ireesrhaisu hoeri B Tat WpmritTzbaa Tcrou
- e , _
ih . d l
- st nh n o s
n n
of a h ot iir f a o et r
o pof et ct wo t vn .
i As ohiue i t naos tQet t wsl pep dr rehcn c rsl am o ne uonnsms uhtrriotosl pttti rrnt _
ft nht iicue yaoac at n) c cn l ppl n reppu n yl i bprcnzonic ot amt sn eDu f
) a o < ireds m So t" ry A t jemnfi r .
eg r . acea csen fot e M 2
- et Amargniapo ecdt C n croeepcoafl urif w i f ne*
- P a s
. Ct saar C h ,frh o gerR a nSrrt
- ( C e gs sraTore t ph o d f eNt o ueo ee n i rsf n N r n d pt ( tt ns1 e t ass O o a a n.s an1 m ceAne I f h syesinft a1 e nl ucyra ar T c il me oosl out r np l P n l rti ei f utt I
R o
s e aert gt smf om e Ni l ns e
l Pmaincd ssii C
S a
e t
i r pl annesig t o eih u a h e h e o meaee ohueh E R T AfDbcfht cTRt StQbT
- D M - )
A s b d d s
- R G
ge nh mu eas ne-acc 2 n C-Ra et .
drs O
R y tit nd l - g
,t ssiist c or ne ogap n
. 2 g Nrraont vspo P g euga on t m ,f e f nl sro d n g s ii pi r t h ml nv ri se ids il nei n ini l ut E e n t ecio pd et sdut sniiit a ti ntasa _
C a n al 5 rnnr u uil ol syne l a adirP z N 2 E u ii p fldq amceeavgpt h rumo(li L
U P d c ap ocneti nuvl rnpn t el dp an I 2 , / n ott a n a r n r ri q r p ui u e 8 p- apecc U
S t
n eg r a rnb paod li semt eeo eu,svsm on ueig 1
o,wseaisnors i u ,
,i,st nr .-
S e h ,lpd n r seef c h s tho A d d a t a tt eacmml ert ccoo t sseli c Y
n a
i n s
4 t neas n nniha asonre d 7 t wcasew T e N oavcldr adeurw neicat e r
ih w cl erpnolhnmo,ie ed ,
eiti c i 2 a otf e prueaf ocees nCdv I 2 L
A 2 P l a
2 s h
P r
oi v
sr ,
pr
,st rrvr u
nvt uf oea 2 s hp mvUh se sr cwar ne C
Q 8 1 e
c r
e 2 p a
k one cf or eonf ,senp,coirl df ooseco go t e 2
a e
seoti se nee _
i n 1 r o i a i eliCf nrncdr 1 r sci vet
- n s V e g Rgtd sttl rbv oipoen- g antdeii _
. o n ry eGr n a r girr nae i naaaar s ipay n a eanRt s i 2 o 2 o l ervpme.l att s t 3 o r yi m a in s i ol t g i a inai amaosussahnun,i i a t rr t vo i e t ipna e t p Bnpu. Pepr s nt cecinl e t p eeoeni
.- v g c npan t c b aeq reprndot rge oa g c b f pf vat r e a e eul a e u tl ref t urpooniiurxriu a R P3 SSPN PSS Appro Acpaf cat mPueot q PSs e u axnil co SeItPaf r
y h et o g p sn f l r a f ae n g- e e r o hm s- o nuu n g e ce eb i9 i cf E t a heduadistr rc cu t3 rl
, an r t a ea ,
a a i e pl nv so cs ecn 2 e r. aif t r pardef om n o t l n P t i e enu l e ili 2 e / u f ruor;saqg aq t get 1
d i
r e
S gpel ,sed;ri .
en i si nua
. s g neras1 ns ss ef ci h he d
n e
r a
- r. 4 t
npeor^
i r ve anean osho t e rsf S oai 1 a P n siaci c agt hra-t t 0 2 e N t a l n ppt mthrt psseacuc a che acp P
I m .
c l n 2 pi g a nt crPa 2 t7 . eus -
- 2 i dn roiiu o o nnc rs A
- 7 1 V
e nea*
r e
2 1
tuidoc al nnf cia dsdf
,fi pot tn e
2 1 >ie ol g n,d nsa 0
1 1
- n s v na wsb i
o 2
o c
it yCni et 2
n o
- it r bws i st aam snl oosm l gr ee 3
n o
ti v0 i n mos rin 0-8 s ul cpntr ut oeesrraau 5 i
d i t e4 ot o i
v e
e r c a
xgay e
l u e
g c a e t cn iueeotk c oadvqet nt co rl neet aiiar e
g c a e t sR r d f ci rnt eua 9
O R 7 Pk ESPS a
6 PS P p a r ri m m m p p 9 P S-inn Fia Pfl I
M l ('l 1 ll l
AUACNT 2 Qt:ALITY ASStRANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION (CPC-2A)
=
Revisio-s 7 Revision 8 Reason for Qiange Basis for Conclusion mOveSsent Calculations, reactor thermal profile studies, etc.
Dewtopment and maintenance of l
Plant Security Plans and contract I administration for the security force.
Performing reactor engineering functions, such as fuel calcula-tions and specification, fuel movement calculations, reactor thermal profile studies, safety l analysis, etc. I 10 Pace 1 Page &
Section 1.2.?b Section 1.2.7b The Nuclear Safety b rd, chaired The Director, Nuclear Safety CPCo has elected to establish h e fun.:tions described will by the Esecutive Director, Services Department (see a specific organizational unit continue to be performed nuclear Assurance Department Figure 31, is responsible for: to carry out of fsite safety re- as required.
(see Figure 3), the nirector, views required by Technical Nuclear Safety, or a culy Performance of the of ftite safety Specifications, instead of the appointed alternate, is respon- review functiors for the nuclear standing committee approach that s1ble for performar4e of the power plants as described in was used before. In addition, ef f site safety review functicas plant technical specifications, sem responsibilities formerly for the nuclear power plants and probabilistic risk assessment. assigned to the Executive Engineer as described in plant technical and Nuclear Assurance Department specifications. Conduct of the biennial assess- are now assigned , this new ment of QA Program ef fectiveness. deprtment.
Assessing the ef fectiveness et the corporate !!ealth Physics progra and maintaining standards for control of Radiological Materials and personnel exposure and recommending p:, gram improve-ments to reduce onsite and offsite radiation esposuret caused by plant operations.
I M10989-0110A-TPOL 4
..-- _ -. _ _ _ _ _ . _ ---_. - _ ~ _ _ _ . . - -_- -,.. . . . . .
! jl l jl 1)ljji{Illllllj )iljlllI ljilllllIl lllllllljl s .
r ee w o-a i r-2 de l t ael c-el a- i reut4 T bc i eo l s bdlQ bchrrce ea N i uo nrt iee -
E r rnn n -
M 1
ao.
et e s" c
s i ee end iito sv fl ct oh -
1 C l r eoi ber nrt l A
T n
o ceo uuf dt e r br e .
oeudaf pSberot o
T i nne ndr otf t s
ey,tnvl e t -
A s ib oee f oso nni rlduoec u ft ith peo ve l
c ons tit t nsra at l pc c o e p oi n
o sc n d cm" ni, ul eatz mh iyn auucnl s nSda e C oye f s e o e ser .
il m se . rtl a i yrsih r t pr e yi n inng t g i th o cpo haco ueor art e t .
f nuf usr t wni qm,o es zeanrnim ,
i s f l p e c l et eagc ru rsdw eee nEdihoeiwar i n a ett nt g s ee nsed escn grmc ono a ue i ame hsu roouoier .
B hfb S wer Tada Ofsdst mP _
y y .
l - "ry t g -
p i e p- seal f n l ui nvee a i si
- Ss e
oal r phce nS e
onnb niiie -
aasrs ennum er l r . s ePs t a srt nai -
u n ro" eg sl e it eor h ph t Feo i sr ci gto ae sc nith rit eot ein
)
aVa e r is nodcn t
hh. y t i cf burdid .
A l ee npe i t en ve,vf e 2 e chp a t eo ihe rl et g l t m eb)i ot n C
P n
a NtO or l sih p pimT hi s i
b>r t Sidt serli m se C h ,t a ytl .ih i t a ynt oll e
( C r e c s p l oapa p pl p ya t
osl nf nst nde N
O r
o tt c cru eoee g eis oeD pr pseutl t uersois I f eon rsbce srs Sr nr T
P n rp ee ni eee yrlisn,sray .
ie- misef rf c I o Dr et ygi si gel assa .
R s a ewn t i arr snv r gi t ees a -
C el wea i ar enkrl c m S e oe ml re noset ea
~
E D
R h .d hilbaec hts El( cins
. M l y
l l l A y -
R l r ne l G
O p
p i o - pa ot p-p r R ue nya r. isr- - ue l or -
P Sl el es neo i Srer cogonae f eja b ,S pl e irp. v .
E lit pcc m rg ee ysif n nml C esneuui dson R v giV i no c N unehSnv AiCi o r yd o s d u _
g) gn n A Fodt r nb e) rl uirnn R pi yf e i a n 6 o pl t ea
- U S
rssogos aeet r i n3na il n0 i
enunr yC o
'. reSiberPipcap .
. s err etc netP o1 A l cs Psnne nEet nra auny i tnguS y,ihoC _
t r l tt Y Nieo,ei ma s gic ae eiegsa ao T
I L
d 2 ,eVanuo ci ittrc 2
e Pidn y Fre og l ct oI 3
dFhrecgrt i
se t ec nirivs no A
U 2 r
ceeedos rers 2 ceoy nec se e
2 eeoEvot ans rst rf al ot _
Q 8 t r h pi r a es m n iS P( ,e r in n
o 1
n cutOsp eg e d 1
n g( rE r o t o h t
1 esl n etsseyt a d pral -.
rihrren erf r t . n cebenrot cp i 4 o i FgaPh a ue 4 o mo a 4 c t8 4 io icidia ei D a
_ i s
v e t g c i
eol e eerccre t
l e g c i
t Et ee srbc all e S g
e t o n e t g c Visiad ,mf r vnst nEiie eroeraTsdw a a e a o a e R
e Pk T( hShNVfft iou PS TssN
'ti Ph hs of PS h S sP c s PepretEooo dmp e -
. r h e -
w a t ) v _
o e 6iyn
~ l )
3 l
c r
o tl o eupi- yar
~ e - y yrcpt rrce t
eic Nef e A gueuaeoie i
n2 5
ggog rdn ure r
,(
scQ i
bf .
r g x S r pt f eiE nF b
yi e r d ai p - .
m nior eti os E e glh o o r ne ot iFce n
ens nent e s
ehratbms et ec a e m _
iI nerE imonn t s n gl rl t
ae aeo l sf e gt pee nrsmv n( oErn e t o i yj u oc 1 0 _
. ce P( t E a e si ds .f t ran P oS d ea e prst i eet at m o T-l s .
2 2
yrl r cobo nti p 2
2 ee vDssr i i sf et scl nsre eibedemdC
- y. P r s i a o s a C rvidrpinP A
0 7 n i7 easr t s af 1 o h 1 grno. 1 un) e 1 ensd o 1 n rt oCg co3l eSoen 0 prae ,dgo.
- 4 i t n
_ i o /
3 t
c ti o
3 n
o esp n misgi 4 o n ei xt eia as 4 o n c i ysPtTli nt s 8
_ s e asi t E nenn t E arnr rung i Vl e pre s&enst 8 e S e e e 9 cr Mninn i t irin t v g t v g c em t a g c eegeo g eg -
naoa O -
a a e a e a R
e 1 1 Pb NPr 2 1 P S hA1 nP dsal 3 1 P S h pi i r TOFbP 4
1 P h .
husiof oril TS1Vf ost t p i
M -
2 ' !ll l l l ! 4
2 1
2 e, 6 nvd T oaer 6 t N
E l y
ihco t uf n 2 .a-si t
e cA r
en me e
r n e
cnd e o e e i y2 Sirl tb1 o
rmis y
aro0 n
n re d e t ba dsip.
T o ob n yb f arir ,desus1 orosbdnceqe T i f al A s t rt b nieaucern u so seo sidol r der o en emn t. l epai5en svtei.
l c
n i
t e i r t oe
. arscu.r cee niice C
o i v l a if v l a a gl t rre q2. e e h s e. t ar2zht ufa l ih i sh rnatl 1i w gcnr i
r b bt ii nus r o id . i nd . ul n e ci s o yn xi p f sed seed ql emi nhcie o s
nne ogc nmne oegc eoeettot at r r b g r ri u r a n t p yr i piu priu t aaot aut aip s ssd sisd e n t n pf c cs l a E
a ese R ar euse R qar hoo T c n N af eS eocesin t aR a bi l
a ,y er i
won oi mo at oa i . n h
t hi nnt a
nas re tir mbt wntor e - n anio h ,ao.
clSz l oce 7 r i a yl etF t2ziS eeeTi abim elhlPma s 1itT vT Fn nava oLrs ntc swrbat e er .iot ogb1 naF itde1n4a g i e o
i e eoeiism nar4 une cab ,o r t a .S eh s h gk li uldeeirl i tnacvqart ctoid
) e xgser r zdlt v i m eecainc an A i ea edd err onsrSl d eel ca 2 e E naga nt cd . R eror
- g ihal aail s t aie ags C
P n
a f t ni m
gnnoe neg r amrt o d "s thff nt oasNi rihhi it es aedst eooin C
( Q i
nec re s omci eoi t
eal daratl rdedme reniit ,d s tma rl o pi e nlTtl d onnt yop N
O r
o iOvha.
t ae dsb i a 2 e d gt pnoinlf eprg I f i,rT e sneo snl ei m1snaSrp uat nCo ,s ua a,mpen T srS aeeus sn E e d e a pi P n oe I
R o
s p gl d pt aaeui
.ii S
einn
,bFio t p eoysoRf wT gi g nt ogt iN" o&rertihsu nMseucnl d
C a enct cs Tsdns acl ncee il qi o c S e h E
D R TNiaco nnop 6anoe 0hacr 1
eoiehhsfheehin 0SntstTiotdrwti M l y A d l r t R
G l
e ao s .
4 ct ir 8 O
R i l ear Le P
F se s rre h n in hp oh Et o d n nbt oao.d To.
i I n) ass o a r
& s V i l Mrd i L Tr g a
t de oe v J
P yFe r raint mr as Lft e r4p: P s R U r a S
S o1 t(ho a gf p ba,u e i rnude n
b l eSq eaq i A rsu, oeo S u alIe cbFr t
aEr e
d Y bcrm et1a4 e
T I a aihi Lvth a hr s
a mTMa
&s a
d u
L 3 ,re 3 t oy a-L 3 l ,
A ,o Pb , , c U 2 rSet 2 g s gps 2 n Q 8 1 e
gl b g l nrdt n t i 1 ioen iSn 1 n aain lf ne wm nTe 5 t o n ncsi n l iI m / n o 4 o o n i
i s i e t Nint nor hpo 5
e i
t 5 omot re r aAttI r ttEa n a 4
e t i
o m _
v g c ecsp g c d nsTp i rp g c e e a e heee a e n o yE e oe a e t R P S TTrr P S a CsPd Nfd P S I l y d l r t e g gsnt niar ao s c n i o 4 ct ea i
Lr 8 ,nn ea i
e, t) sf s r- r e rr s1 a5r rte ,
hp oe Eh h p
oege e&gm nbh Tt ff nms p
O (Onh ai a
r g t oat .
iLod Mo.
e -Lot re d
a r
g eiid nrvt r a a
,sNo a addt rnns a i o,hrd re r Pf s r tf un 6 _
ech t a p
baae u rd e a p c aosoa 0 enqu df t A i
gi g g b l e ,q b i er s Q-avun u alSe t ae u f san nroi S cbTr s r S iuday 1 _
ert a& E a
NShr t o a hr etOsa NTs a t
sgat a unt nhr d
0 P
l.2 el p 3 t oy a%a 3 jissn T 7
va ,e icer til 7 g Pb ,
nrdt s
nPt gL s 2 z
ginec nrol ed so. A 0
1 1 unbs 1 i oen i n 1 ioi set 1 n chir lf ne nSe tht y 0 _
o 4 io n ccso n l wm iTm n nt acf a -
i s
aent EToc pe 4 o i 5 omot re r tor a&t 4 o i
euraor mabr b 8 _
e 8 i
v t e t ttEa n a e t u i uti 9 g c edsr g c d nsTy& p o irp g c cdl cal O e 5 a hnei 6 a e n oe _
R 1 P S e
T arD 1 P S a CsMde Nfd 7 1
a e P S onacha Dacatc I
M _
- _ -. _.-__________m____ m .__ _ _. ._.____ _.__ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .- _, - . . _ . - _ . --
~
l ATTAOl'ENT 2
- QlAI.ITY ASSDLANCE PROGRA?! DESCRIPTION (CPC-2A) i Revisine 7 Revision il Reason for 0.ange Basis for Conclusion
+ 18 1
Page 4 Page 5 Srction 1.2.3a, Subparagraph 9 Section 1.2.3a, Subparagraph 8 Preparing and obtaining the Preparing, reviewing, approving Qianges made in Revision 7 of All reviews required by i required reviews and approvals and obtaining additional reviews CPC-2A, and further clarified Revision 7 ccetinue to be j of purchase requests for and approvals if required, of in this revision, allow for required by Revision 8.
services, equipment and con- purchase requests for services, trained and certified personnel Responsib1112y for QA I sumables, and sutssitting such equipment and consus bles, and to perform Q4 reviews of pro- review may rest with requests to Purchasing for submitting such requests to curement. These persons nay 114TS in the future, but j procurement action. Purchulng for procurement not be part of the QA organi- the review itself has
! action, zation. This change recog- not been reduced.
i nizes the fact that, at some j . future time, IMTS may be in a position to perfo m QA i reviews, but, until such time, would be required to obtain this review.
19 ,
Page 5 Pare 5 ;
Section 1.2.3b, 3rd Subparagraph Section 1.2.3b, 3rd Subparagraph Providirig electrical equipment Providing electrical equipacnt Responsibility for developing The function descrited will
) and turbine generator empertise. and turbine generator expertise and , qualifying w.1 ding and continue to be performed i and developing and qualifying heat treating procedures was as before. There is no special process procedures for transferred from Field reduction in commitment.
welding and heat treating hintenance Services to operations. Projects, Construction and
) Equipment (see It s 20).
A 20 Page 5 Page 5 i Sec t ion 1. 2. 3c Section 1.2.3c ,
t The Nnager, Field mintenance The *iasager, Field N intenance Skill Center operation and The functions described will Services provides Field Services provides Fic1d & inte- development and qualification continue to be performed as Maintenance Services for major nance Services for major modi- of welding / heat treating pro- be fore. There is no re-ll modifications and plant outages, fications and plant outages. cedures were transferred out duction in commitment.
1 and operates the Sk!11 Centers, l of MIS (see Items 19 and 27).
and develops and qualifies special process procedures,and fj qualifies personnel and equigeent j for welding and heat treating.
I l
i 4 M10988-0110A-TPO1 7 a
1 1
- - - - - - - . _ - _ _ - . - - . - - - - - - - . - - - _. - - - - -- . . - - . - - -. .~. .. . - . . - - _ . ._. . - - - . . _
' ,i I iI ;i j[i 1[l! l + I I m
- 8 T . . -
N n d e
E P
i n ai g -
H m n C en a A n ro s s h -
._ T o i ee eec ih I i st ih
_ A s u
mc eu ttt i o t tt i o l t d lhn lhn c
n o
ie l
r it .
bic i wv it bie iwv .
C ao. s a s a 3 nnt ndh ndh 2 -
r i n gse oe oe pt n s -
. o pt n.
a f iim saod sao t r t eiie eii
_ i s oei rm rct g oin rct oi I
s eem essa ess e -
a ho hsoh hso e
_ B hTc T a pc Tap S _
g eti on e .
_ t t t l
as ca aya rl r ot e ay rl ot pcp pcf i
nd reO ree -
or ori he.
ci Cif Cih efE tiL P de i P
- dC -
tC Vsh Vsd _
) f nP tC t n _
A oedh er era.
ho r 2 e hod
- C P
C h
g n
a sig eeo u m
t rr Tpn ea
.r t T pt e enc rei df
( C i eh ewn ewif .
m N r l wt goe nnd gosO nne rg 3
2 -
O o aee a i a -
I f nrl hss . hsPn s
_ T P n oib it a ceercre ce i cet e
t -
I o t rl ciPc eiha I -
R s iei i v i l vt r m_ C S
E D
R a
e d pa d xv Aea l ,j t ref iehf TStO lI t r e ieop TStO l
S e
e W _
l a
c s
a ,
esl g
- i os -
r
)
5 o
d n o T hp iyrean vn ,i eeet a t N a r ot sg prc /
p P
E r
g a
r tot i cl eened eihcaen tbtohna ascisir A pn e n dedPp nri seri o
O ui ei gV e r vF eif s A n coQi r g d n
ascc Liii ee s
C a a a sel Vv -
N p , pnpegs rci sehe i hv .de t et r ee ,) r A
R b
u dai ec l mne ed sirt v e P e ae e O.
rshS g in fi g5ee n hS
_. U S
S t swnill c sa , o i) t5et od t(
s u e .i O cng i et sr e S d n
eeocaa i c r igotCee nnra p auht hgga A uiiecrf l eiso Y
T I.
2 d
3 qvt pi u o eeasrt rrr e ,tcn sd pyeri cuo a irVef cu agei.g TihvO.i c
n b
iihrdst .
mnton ns d n Aaer paf at ol pe n c ciur rFoorp u
Pehr
_ l 4 ,Ftr 4
,l lPbCng ot 4 eto -
._ A a n O gl t t n m , s C U 2 ,a resa. 2 rehS e O. i 2 r i end u 2 r( e _
Q 6 ru,li - c eeg Ca ed s ,dinc e l . -
_ 1 geal s 1 gsue t 1 gnnti mao 1 gsbt n nsel sild s( otdn aaonsl d ali n o n iil agvpr dt ctnipa 6 o n n rani 6 o n n peeis rfdn n
o nase 6 o Nssdn eiP org 7 i
Nvtehraa Nind
. i s
e t i i veNst rueicad n e t t
i o
pt m e i
t ors roi e i
t roi eps v
e g c a e op rxof onnt adda r c a e eternd hol oen g c a e ei srhiee eeccs g c a e h et se er R PS Pet ocaas PS TmbCda PS htaiPtmrd PS TNrP h
p a
- nc i oe nil s-i g
n h
u g &
/
i g
n e c
r g ht e-ca seef o s p d
oen rt a r
e d
n)Ve is m a er i ,l diccel n t: amr e a5 c .
r t eyv n iil e aet rro n L ei a pgi v e oifdi ehv .
b p
d , Orc. u s a)VvOe 5
ee d r nsepa o( l rs rin eg gu
, rt r e
_ u erldg eehS&r i boOef e n gh S
_ S t al nn i rt ttiC ci iig scaai t u eno ans eict sFue d eit r i ght af men,cf en a ot n ucel e li gam rmotif pa hera
_ 2 <umaecn g
eN iFurrr c ooie .
o e p n V O sl f gse ps cehr rst o 1
O -
r fii aerpacg naedelf t u( p P
_ d 3 st a
oong an 4 a F ehrhin
,(
st oCfi C f n b
A.
I nrihaodn
,N s e sti cgam ne c
A.
P
,l er sl o bC T
A she
_ 7 2 ,t eel ac 2 r eel e,ceOia 2 r i ronn u es Ptaisc 2 rai, eis 0
1 1 gorma 1 gvbtil t gn) nmd o 1 Prnt 1 1 _
n npa ,ru aiinVan n
ao5esil rd aeon 0 -
o n i p n nt se i i ni ceFio n nt pe -
6 o eic 6 io 8 i
s 5
e i
o t
d uel t ishac v t cu 6 o e t t Nmoihnm ond eca opst a i
e t Nts. rVif foeg ru vcrri cn e t NP issd ei rs 8
9 i
v g c ot i r g c et se nd g c eegeric s g c ed e 0 -
e 1 a e ranrt E a e hueroin 3 e e h pi h e 4 a e R 2 PS P ci t s I PS TArPtFa 2 PS TOFtSmiAe m( d 2 PS hnsr aiP I
H
- ); .llli1d ))}t b 1l1-
- 1 ilfk! ;
.i l ij il!h ,]" ;4 ll:l) a4) 1
.___ - ~ _ _ - - _ . - _ _ - - _ - .. _ ~ _ _ ~ . ~ . _ - . . - _ - _ . _-_ _~ _ _ ~ _ - . - . - _ . . _._ __. - _ . _ .
ATTACH!Orr 2 QUALITT ASSL'RANCE PROCRAM DESCRIPTION (CPC-2A)
Revision 7 Revision 8 Reason for Change Basis for Conclusion to the Vice Qia*rman 4. Chief tie President end C.O.O. for l t Financial Officer for initiating procurement action t initiating procurement... taased on. ..
25 Page 6 Pa e 6 Section 1.2.4d t on 1.2.4 h e Director, Nuclear Fuel M Item o in Revision 8. See ne Director, Nuclear Fnel See Item 11.
Supply (see Figure 2) is Item 11, above. Supply. now reports to the i responsible through the Vice VP- % clear Operations. See President, Cas Transmission / Item 11. I
] Fuel Supply to the Executive Vice President, Energy Supply for the procurfment of nuc1 car i fuel and associated services, i
i
^
26
'T Page 7 Page 7 Section 1.7.4f Section 1.2.4e "Executive Vice President. "Senior Vice President, Energy Title Change. See Item 2. See Item 2.
Energy Supply" Supply" 27 Page 7 Page 7 Section 1.2.4 Section 1.2.4f 1 No item in Revision 7 Se- The Director, Performance Improve- l he responsibility for Skill h e responsibilities formerly i Item 20 atsove for original ment, Planning and Training is I Center operation and qualifica- in PC&E Department will con-l location, responsible to the Senior Vice tion of welding personnel was tinue to 1,e carried out as President - Energy Supply for transferred to this new depart- before.
] operating the Skill Centers and ment (see Item 20). ,
.i training and qualifying personnel i and equipment for welding operations.
28 1
l Page 7 Page 7 Section 1.2.5 Section 1.2.5
...Ite is also responsible for ...He is also responsible for The functions of independent The functions no longer providing management directico to providing manaymer.z direction to safety engineering, corporate under the Director, QA were i departarnt heads reporting to his department heads reporting to him health physics oversite and not QA" responsibilities, j as indicated teelow for indepen- as indicated taelow for corporate l corporate security administra- trat will continue to be dert safety engineering, cor- environmental auditing.... tion were transferred out of carried out. There la l porate environmental auditing, the QA Department. The first reduction in the respcnn.
t ttIO988-0110A-TP01 9 i
I
,- v.-3 --,-----,---r-.m., --- ---.-*m% ,-+--em ev-w,-w-.-,a>w.-- ,y.v_.,- .g -
.-r .-ms.--, g -%e- , .-- w:. --- - - - . - - , , - - . c , . __ _
- - . . =
- . . - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ .- _- ~_ . _ - - _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - .-
_ _ _ .- . . . _ _ = _ . .
ATTACILM 2 QUALITY ASSUFJLVT PROGRAff DESOtIPTION (CPC-2A)
Lvision 7 Revision 8 Reason for Change Basis for Conclusion -
I corporate health physics over- and last were transferred to the bility or authority of sight an3 corpo; ate security plant. Health physics oversite this position with respect administration..., was transferred to Nuclear to QA.
Safety Services. See Items 9 and 10.
29 Page 7 Page 8 Section 1.2.5, Subparagraph 7 Section 1.2.5 Assuring routine attendance and Item deleted in Revision 8. This was a responsibility assigned Since this was criginally participation by NAD staf f at See Item 9 above. to NAD when one of its uaits added to CPC-2A because sectings of the Plant Review (Nuclear Safety Department) of Technical Specifications Cressit tee, served the function of "plant concerning independent safety engineering." This unit safety engineering functions, was transferre4 to plant control it is being deleted as thos.
(see Ites 9), so that this is no Tech Specs are altered.
songer a QA Department item. The There is no reduction in 4 plant safety engineering and commitment with respect
} offsite review functions will be to the QA program, or as described in plant Technical with respect to the responsi-Specifications. bilities of the QA Depart-ment (see Section 1.2.54, 9th subparagraph).
30 Page 7 Page 8 Section 1.2.5 Section 1,2.5, Subparagraph 8 Iso item in Revision 7 Administering an Enhanced This section is added to recog- This change was previously Performance Incentive P Ogram nize a new responsibility of approved vis NRC ccrre-according to Sect'on 2.3. this position. spondence dated Nrch 1, 1988.
31 Page 8 Page 9 Section 1.2.Sa, Subparagraph 4 Se ction 1.2.Sa, Subparagraphs 4 and 5 Review of and concurrence with At Big Rock Point, review of and l Tnis change recognizes the trans- See Item 8.
1 quality requirements of procure- concurrence with quality require- fer of certain functions related l ment request packages for plant ments of procurement request to procurement from the site QA j site-originated procurements, packages for plant site-origi- Department at Palisades, to the
) nated procurements. Palisades Plant. QA is, however,
, retaining responsibilities re-I MIO988-0110A-TP01 10
- _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ - . - - - _ _ _ _. .-_ m_ _ - - - _ . - . . _ . _ _ . _ . - _ _ . - -- ._ m -. -
ATTACHTNT 2 '
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCIULM IESCRIPTION (CPC-2A) i
- Revision 7 Revision 8 Reason for Qiange Basis for Conclusion i Review and concurrence with pro- lated to nuclear fuel procure-curement quality requirements ment because of the specialized for nuclear fuel, source audit / nature of these items. This surveillance / inspection at fuel change was discussed with
- supplier facilities, fuel Region III NRC personnel prior receivfng inspection, and review to implementation. See of fuel supplier quality-related Item 8.
documentation.
32 Page 8 Page
- i Section 1.2.5a, Suttaragraph 5 Section 1.2.Sa, Subparagr wh 6 Plant oesite QA engineering Plant onsite QA engineering Procurement Q4 Engineering See Itas 8.
associated with modification associated with modification is transferred to Palisades I design, procurement,constru - design, procurement (at Big Plant, as indicated above, for tion and testing, including Rock), constructio n and testing, Palisades procurements. See j verification that quality- ancludh.g veri 11 cation that Item: 8 and 31.
l related test prerequisites quality related test pre-
! have t.een... requisites have been...
33 ,
Page A Page 9 Section 1.2.54, Euttaragraph 6 Section 1.2.54, Subparagraph 7 Vendor surveys for local pro- At Big Rock vendor surveys fer This change recognizes the trans- See Item 8. '
curements, source curve 111ance/ urgent procurements, source fer of certain functions re-
! Inspection at supplier fac11- snrveillarce/ inspection at lated to procurement from the j ttles, and review of sigplier supplier facilities, and re- site QA Depat taent at Palisades 1 quality-related documentation, view of supplier quality- to the Palisades Plant. This related documentation. change was discussed with Region III NRC personnel prior J to implementation. See Items 8, 31 and 32.
4 Page 9 Page 9 ;
Section 1.2.5a, Subparagraph 7 Sect ion 1.2.5a, Suttaragraph 8 Plant site quality control Plant site quality control in- The receiving inspection function See Item 8.
inspection program, including spectfon program, including was one of the areas transferred receiving inspection and inspec- receiving inspection (at Big from Palisades site QA to tion and acceptance activities Rock) and inspection of mainte- Palisades Plant control. This associated with maintenance, nance, modifications, testing change was discussed with Re-
- modifications, testing and and fuel handling. gion III NRC personnel prior to i fuel handling. implementation.
I 1
MIO988-0110A-TP01 11
?
__- ..m _ __ ____ _ _ _ _ _ . . ._. . . . . _ - _ - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ . _ _ _ _ -m _. .- _ _.
r!
ATIAODENT 2
) Ql'ALITY ASSURANCE PROQULM DESOt1PTION (CPC-2A)
Revision 7 Revision 8 Reason for Qiange Basis for Conclusion i M Page 9 Page 9 j Sect ion 1.2.54, Subparagraphs 9 Section 1.2.5a Subparagraph 10 10 and 11
< Review of and concurrence with Review of maintenance, modifica- These three itests were combine ( a -hange is editorial I test procedures (including preop, tion, test, and fuct handling into one for editorial clarity on a3 All items previously d
functional, inservice baseline procedt:res and instructions, and and brevity. Other sections of requiring review by site
, and modification tests) and work authorising documents for Crc-2A also further amplify QA still must be so re-instructions for QA aspects, QA aspects, inspect.on planning, theen, and for what reasons, QA viewed. There is no and tc, identify necessary Hold and inclusion of necessary Hold review is required. reduction in commitment.
l and Notification points. and M tification points.
Review and approval of inspretion procedures and plant ensite inspection planning.
Revies of work authorizing
! documents.
i 36 j~
Page 9 Page 10 Sec t i on 1. 2.% Sect ion 1.2.%
The Director, Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Support Section The General Office Section 11 cads The functions performed will f Support is responsible to the Heads (Corporate Office) are now' report to the Director, QA. continue as before. There Executive Director, !bclear responsible to the Director, (Formerly they reported to the is no reduction in commitment.
Assurance for... Q w11ty Assurance for... Director, QA Support, who re-ported to the Executive Director -
Nuclear Assurance. With the elimination of the latter position, the Director, QA now l uses the General Of fice QA staff in the same wa the Director, QAS.) y as did 37 i Page 9 Page 10 Section 1.2.%. Subparagraph 1 Section 1.7.% Subpsragraph 1
- QA audit program (plant sites and QA, Security and Environmental The functions of Security and There is no change in l Corporate Office), including audit programs (plant sites and Environmental auditing are responsibilities from follow-up on corrective action Corporate Office), including included. T1.cse were already Revision 7.
for audit findings. follow-up on corrective action included as responsibilities for audit findings. of the department in Revision 7, l
' 12 M10988-0110A-TP01 1
b
)
4
_~ . - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - _ _ _ . - - _ _ - - . _ . _-- . , - -. - -_ _ _ __.
_ - - _ - - _ _ - - - - - . _ _ - - - _ _ -, . - - - _ - _ - _. - . . - _ _ _ .- - ~ - . . _ . . . .
ATTACHMENT 2 Q.'ALITY ASSURANCE PROGRA?! DESCRIPTION (CPC-2A)
Revision 7 Revision 8 Reason for Change Basis for Conclusion so this is primarily an editorial change to provide a better summary at the proper location in the test.
I 38 Pa ge 9 Page 10 Tec t son 1.2.5b. Subparagraph 4 Section 1.2.5b. Sutmaragraph &
Review of and concurrence with Review of and concurrence with This change recognizes that All reviews required by quality requirements of procure- quality requirements of procure- changes previously approved to . Revision 7 continue to be ment request packages generated ment request packages generated Section 4.0 of CPC-2A might sticw required by Revision 8 In the C>rporate Office, in the Corporate Office, as l some General Office organizations There is no reduction required. l to train and certify personnel in timing er content of for QA review of procurement review and trained and documents. Thus, Ceneral Office certified reviewers y grmps wculd only review those are required to perform requiring review where the origi- these reviess.
nating organization could not do so.
39 Page 10 Page 10 Section 1.2.5b. Subparagraph 10 Section 1.2.5 Development and maint .r ur of item not included in this section This responsibility has been See Item 9.
Plant Sec --ny rians and contract in Revision 8. See Item 9 above. transferred to the plants. See J.J.atnistration for the security Item 9.
force.
I 40 i
! Page 10 Page 10 I Section 1.2.5c Section 1.2.5 lhe Director Nuclear Safety is Item not included in this section The Director,16uclear Safety All identified functions responelble to the Executive in Rev8sion 8. See Items 9 and now reports to the VP-Nuclear continue to be assigned Director, helear Assurance for 10 above. Operations. Some functiens and . carried out as indi-safety analyses, safety assess- were transferred to plant cated in Revision 8.
1 meets, o,-arating esperience control. See Items 9 and 10. There is no reduction in 3
reviews including NPC Information ccessitment.
1 Notices, probabilistic risk j as.essmeat, cdainistrative and technical support for Eclest Safety Board activities amt
, technical support for onsite j review organizatt.es.
1 M10988-0110A-TP01 13 i
m --.__ .-. . _ _ _ - _ .. _-._ . .- _ _ . . . _ _ -___.m.- - . . _ _ _ _.m _ .- . - - - .- =-.. _ . -..
l i
- ATIAQeENT 2 1
WALITY ASSL1UL%CL PROCRAM DESCRIPT10!8 (CPC-2A)
I Revision 7 Revisice 8 Krasen for Giange Basis for Conclusion -
i 41 Page 10 Page 10 Section 1.2.5d Section 1.2.5 1he Corporate Ikalth Eysicist Ites not included in this section The Corporate Hestth M ysicist The functions described is responsible to the Executive in Revision 8. See Iten 10 above. is now part of 3e Nuclear Safety continue to be performed
- Director, Nuclear Assurante Services Department. His respon- as before, as indicated for assessing the ef fectiveness sibilities still include the in item 10. There is no of the corporate Health Mysics itres troc Revision 7 See reduct'on in commitment.
proras. Ile maintains standards Item 10 for control of Radiological Materials and personnel exposure and rectemends program leprove-
- ments to reduce ensite and of f-site radiation exposura caused by plant operation.s.
42 4
Page 11 Page 11 Desusers Power C<epany Consusmers Power Caspany OrEanization G art Organization Gart ll "President and O tef Executive "President and Chief Operating Corrects organization chart ta SG Items 1 and 22.
]
d Officer" Officer" match Section 1.0.
1 "Vice O mirman and 041ef Not identified in Revision 8.
Financial Officer" 4
43 Page 12 Page 12 Energy Supply Organization G art Erwrgy Supply Organtration mart "Execu.1ve Vice Presideci, Energy "Senfor Vice President, Energy Corrects organization chart to See items 2, 3, 11, 25 Supply" Supply" match Section 1.0. and 27.
"Vice President, Cas Transmission / M kcluded in Revision 8.
j Ibel Supply" "Director, Nuclear Puel Supply
- See nemt item.
, (Not included in Revision 7) "Director, Performance Improve-ment. Planning and Training" l
! MIO988-0110A-TP01 14 1
I I
- - - - - - - - -- - - - . , , . - - - _ _ _ . - , - - - - - ,- ,-- ~ c.- -,. , ,., _._,n.-- - -, , , - , . . , - , , - , - c . - - - - - - . - , - - - . . . , , - .
2 5 1
3 1 6 3
n ,
, 3 o 1 2
i 1 0 s 1 u , d t 0 , n c 1 9 a a.
o , , 2 .
C 4 4 2 5 1
r s s s f
o m.
e t5 m.
t1 t m t m
s I2 I 4 I I i
s ed ed e e a en en e e 5 Sa Sa S S o o o t t t t t t t r r r r a a a a h h h h c c c c n n n n .
o o o o0
) i i i i 4 t . t . t . t1 2 e a0 a0 a0 a
- g r z z zn C n t 1 i1 i1 i o P a n n n ni C an an an at
( a go ri go ri go ri gc
.e N r ot ot ot eS O o c c I f sec se se sh T tS tS tS t c P n c c c ct I o eh eh eh ea G
s a
rc rt rc rt rc rt rm r
S e oa oa oa uo E R Cm Cm Cm Ct D
M A e R t G "r a g l
"r to O n r a R t o "r o n c P n o c i o
. "s p i i n
e . t e t t . . r t E m 8 - c r a c 88d8 o a h C t e i z e a C r c N r ns r D i n
r nnen e ve "g e A a oe i i oolio d p T R p i c D - a D ii i n s O in s 1 e si g ssns a n ti e d S
S D i v -
vr y r - ii oi .
o f e rn an c l e
l O vviv i i A s n
ee e RS c p
p e e
c eet e o t a
i t a v r
i F
RR cR t h sl Y o ny a n u c n e t z C iP e .
T i r
S n a nnSn u i n S 8 I t it a r ii i b n d id L a e us l e
r u - i a n mn y b A r n df u s dd d r E a d a l n a U e o ea s u s s
s eete t r A: p o L Q 8 pt A F A ddrd s O t . pt O t d l rS "r y u A y uuou i n ,n u t ,
r "s n a r D s de "rroe i S a l l pl o r z a 4 y ccpc 6 z ee y ec 3 caot t 5 i 1 a i net 1 e 1 t i nnun 1 iegt 1 yi gc s e n il c1 l i l iiSi gi scaa g n ai i
v e
gc l a g
cea t uru u c e g
l a
a u ttAt e r v g e r einr rf e e
g r a e E nv ar e a r E a u Q oQo a n e Pfmp a n r Me R P Fu O hAiQ' D"
- PQ " hN" N PES " O"O P EO " S e e v "r t i e a t e n e d r t u v o v A o g n i i p n e
cex "e.i t t t - r i m u ) a u "ts "r o t t Eec 7 r c i o g C d a r se 1 e ct n f e a n r e
a p - rx n o n a E x i c i syroe e "r r d n s s p "s uE t e ds g a n n "t e Oe D rs-
"reoa Ae v i
i s
O r -
hDcn i t e n l o O on ie i c ,i c
s e ei rg o t a dnaemg t m "r a e w rv er n eB rc e e c h- i r ge 1
o n an R c n t in t z a 0 i iyea n a l yDE u i cra S aS P t gtl r n a r at b n nion y
n T-a necu i r u ee y a aff a r n e o Ef us aNs D u
s s
s Hf ate t
i t
r g r
uf nM rOI l
p o n mlca A G
7_ ps eS ,A O s eSrf s O t
,sn pi ei 1 O t v N A Ar "r a r pS oa u vn g
c 3 r z a i r r r "r t aoaon 4 r aorap t
5 i
D s e
al iaro Qiei 6 S
t a
r ih t c 1
0 i
s 1 a i uet eti 1 a e
et oeut 1 y c enaa cgt 1 y g
t n
ue 8 8
e n cl cl c l c pl S n gi cT i e l a ececet e l ccrc a e r v canr e r a e 9 v g e g ruro g c u:ouAl g e r i nae g e g xd 0 R
e 4 4
a PbO r m%iNiN E" "D" D(
5 4
a PE N 1D"C "N "Q "P 6
4 a n e PES ViMp
" F" O 7
4 P a -n 1 O r En
" a 1
M
._ _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ .____ _ = _ . - ___ _
ATTAC19ENT 2 QUA1.ITY ASSI'RAN'E PROGRAM DESCRIPTIO!v (CFC-2A)
Revision 7 Revision 8 Wesson for Change Basis for Conclusion 48 Page 18 Page 18 Section 2.2.5b Section 2.2.5b Lhen Contractors perform work Lihen Contractors perform work The change re ognizes that, The review of contractor tander their own quality assurance under their <wn quality assurance with the transfer of some pro- QA programs is still re-programs, these program. are prograns,these programs are curement QA functions to quired, and must still reviewed for cc1rpliance with resiewed for compliance with Palisades Plant, the QA Depart- seet requirements of the applicabic requirements of the applicable requirements of ment may not be the only group Section 4.0 of CPC-2A.
IOGR50 Appendix B and the coe.- 10CFR50 Appendix 5 and the con- authorized to approve contractor The change merely allows tract and are approsed t,y helear treet and are approved by CPCo l QA programs. Sac Item 8. for more than one organ-Assurance prior to the start of prior to the start of work. Izaticmal unit to do the work. required review.
49 Page 20 Page 20 Sect im 2.2.9b Section 2.2.9b Personnel who perforse inspection Fersonnel who perform inspection this change corrects references The qualification require-and examination functions are ar.d esasination functions are to acceptatie qualification pro- ments for inspection and qualified in accordance with qualified in accordawe with grams, adding reference to examination personnel have requirements of Regulatory requirements of Regulatory Section 10.2.7 of the QAPD not been altered or re-Guide 1.58, SNI TC-1A, or the Guide 1.58, SNT TC-1A, or the (which has existed since duced, since Section '0.2.7 ASME Code, as applicable. AS*E Code, or Section 10.2.7 Revision 0) as a possible way provided an alternative in of this QAPD, as applicabic. of qualifying inspection and all earlier revisions of examination personnel. See CPC-2A. The change merely Item 60 for additional clari- completes a string of fication of Section 10.2.7. references.
50 Page 21 Page 21 3ect ion 2.2.10c Su t ion 2.2.10c- ,
Management teams independent Management. teams independent This change allows the indeper.4- This change was previously from the Quality Assurance f rom the wality Assurance organ- ent audit of the QA organization approved via NRC correr-organization, but ksweledge- ization, but kncauledgeable in to be used to accomplish the spondence dated March 1,1988.
abic in auditing and quality auditing and quality masurance, biennial review of effectiveness assurance, bienniaily review biennially review the ef fective- of the QA Progras..
the ef fectiveness of the ness of the Qnality Assurance Quality Assurance Program Program fer (peratiocal Eclear for Operational Nuclear Power F1mnts. Th!r. ve*-tew may Power Plants. Conclusions be performed sJ oart of the and recommendations are indeper dent audit of the reported to the Eaccutive Vice Quality Assurance organization.
President, Energy Supply. Conc 1.ssions and reccamendattore are reported to the Senior Vice Paesident, Energy Supply.
M10988-0110A-TP01 16
__ _ _____ _ ____. _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _. ___ _ ________ _ _ _ . ~ . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ , . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - , _ _ _ _ . .. . , _ _ _ _ _ _ _
ATIAC19ENI 2 '
l QUALITY ASS 11tAEE PROGUO1 DESCRIPIICN (CPC-2A)
Revision 7 Revision 8 Reason for G an g Basis for Conclusion
$1 l Pqe 21 i Sectien 2.3 SectIon 2.3, including Taragraphs 2.3.1 Through 2.3.4 l No Section 2.3 was included D.11ANCED PERFORMANCE INCDTIVE This change establishes require
- This change was previously In Revision 7. PROGRAM meats covering the Enhanced approved via NRC corre*
l i
Performance Incentive Program, spondence dated March 1,1988.
The Directer, Quality Assurance
( evaluates performance of organt-rational units to determine which, if any, may have the Icvel of QA
, oversight of in prccess activities l . reduced. Consideration is given to the folicwing ta making the determinations regulatory perform-l ance; qualificatkon, knowledge and perfonsance of personnel; internal audit /survelliance/ inspection results; results of assessments by '
op - de W ent organizations; ov. formance to established requ .e as, and corrective u tion periormance.
Tt.ose onganizational units selected may receive reduced QA/QC attention in aresa such as direct reviews (for example, maintenance / work order order or procedure review), inspection coe2 rage, or surveillance, as warranted. Audit ftequency is not wbject to reduction.
As Enhanced Performance Incentive ,
Irogram Plan is developed for each Arganizational unit entering the Program to define the performance criteria to te maintained, the areas where QA/QC will be r <!uced, and the intervals at which performance will be assessed and reported.
Ferformance of organizational units in the Program is monitored and reported to the Director, Quality Assurance, at intervals established as part of the entry conditions.
Dec!!ning perfcruance r=sults in M10908-0110A-TP01 17
.__ ,. _ . . - . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ , . _ _ _ . . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ , _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ~ . . . _ _ , . _ _ _ . . _ _ . - _ _ . . . _ _. _ - _ _ . _ . , . . . ._
1 ATIAONENT 2 '
QUALITY ASSURANG PROGRAM DE5m'i' TION (CPC-2A)
Revision 7 ?.evision R Reason for Otany Basis for Conclusion return to normal or increased QA/QC attentton.
52 Page 23 Page 23 Section 3.2.1 5ection 3.2.1 Authority and res7onsibility Authority and responsibility for This change corrects the organt- This is a name change for modification activities modification activities under the zation title from Projects, only. Responsibilities under the cognizance of the cognizance of the Nuclear Oper- Engineering and Construction to and requirements are ,
Nuclear Operations Departm2ent ations Department and the Energy Energy Supply Services Department. not altered or reduced, and Projects, fr.gtneering and Supply Services Department are Const ruc tion (PfAC) e described in Section 1.0, described in Sectios.1.0, ORGANIZATTON.
ORCANIZATION....
53 Page 27 Page 27, Sec t ion 4. /.1, 2nd Paragraph Section 4.2.1, 2nd Paragraph Procurement request packages Procurement request packages are This change is consistent with The substance of this change are reviewed and approved prior reviewed and approved prior to changes approved in Revision 7 was approved as part of to sutaittal to the Purchasing sutmittal to the Purchasing. (to Section 4.2.4), but which Revision 7 of CPC-2A. The and Nterials %nagement 1.and and Materials Department. were inadvertently omitted from requirements of hvision 7 Department. Eevicw includes Review includes verification this section at that time. The are not altered or reduced verificatf.on by Nuclear that the necessary quality lchangealsosupportsthetrans- by this change, since the Assurance Department that the requirements a;e specified, fer of some site QA functions to review is still required necessary quality requirements the plant. See Items 8 and 31. ud its content the same.
are specified.
54 Page 27 Page 27 Section 4.2.3e Section 4.2.3e A requirement for a .locumented A requirement for a documented The requirements for a QA Prcgram, subject to Nuclear QA Program, subject to CP Co l This change, recognizes similar that the QA toorganiza-Item 48, documented QA Program and Assurance Department review review and written concurrence tion rey not always be the for review and written and written concurrence prior prior to the start of work. reviewing authority. concurrence, have not been to the start of work, altered or reduced. The change o @ allows for more lhan CPCo crganization to perform this function.
N MIO988-0110A-11*01 18 a -_ _ - _ . - - - . _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _- -. _ -. -- .,
A2TCDDENT 2 QUAI.ITY ASST *RANCE PROGRAM DESOtIPTION (CPC-2A)
Revision 7 Revisinn 8 Reason for 01ange Basis for Conclusion 59 Page 28 Page 28 Secticn 4.2.4 h tion 4.2.4 Personnel trained, qualified Trained, qualified and certified This ct.ange recognizes that the The requirement to use and certifisd by the hclear personnel perform and document QA Department may not be the properly qualified persor.nel Assurance Department perform reviews of procurement request only organization that would in performing the reviews
, and document reviews of pro- packages to assure thatz... train, qualify and certify has not been reduced. If curement request pac 6_ ages to personnel to perform tt.ese the QA Departa-nt is not
- assure thats... reviews. See Item 8 the certifying agency, it will at least have reviewed the procedures used by the certifying organization to assure their adequacy.
(See Sections 1.2.54, 2nd subparagraph, 1.2.5b, 8th
' subparagraph and 6.2.3c.)
Thus there is no reduction in commitment.
56 Pa e 34 Page 34
, et en 6.2. 2 .Sec t ion 6. 2. 3_c Performance and documentation of Performance and documentation of Due to the transfer to the plant The requirement that cert in a review for concurrence with a review f or concun rence with of some site QA responsibilities doctaments be reviewed for Quality Aasurance related Qua m e Assurance related with respect to procurement, Qbrelated aspects has r:ot aspects of Items 6.2.2a, c, o aspects of Items 6.2.2a, c, d the QA Department is not always been altered or reducco.
(except for operating pro- (except for operating procedures), the assigned reviewing organt- Itesponsibility for such cedures), e and g by the 16 clear e and g. review may now rest with j Assurance Department. l zationlisted for all of the items (particularly c and g) then more than one organization.
they deal with procurement. The There is no reduction in change retains the requirement c(mmitment. See Item 8 but defers to Section 1.0, and i
other sections, to establish
. r2sponsib(11ty f or the reviews.
1 See Item 8.
I j 57 f
i Page 43 P5ge 43 Section 10.2.2 Section 1A 2.2 i
Inapections are applied to pro- Inspectio,s are applied to pro- Due to the transfer to the plant The requirement that in-curement , mainter.ance, modifica- curement, maintenance, modifica- of some site QA responsibilities spections bee applied to tion, testing, fuel handling tion, testing, fuel handling and with respect to procurement, the certata activities, and and inservice inspection to inservice inspection to verf fy QA Department is not always the that reviews be done to verify that items and activities that items and activities conform assigned reviewing organization assure proper inspections MIO988-0110A-TP01 19
ATTACHMENT 2
- QUA1.ITY ASWRANCE PROGRAM DES *3tIPT10tt (CPC-2A)
Revision 7 . Revision 8_
Reason for Oaange Easis for Conclusice conform to specified require- to specified requirements. Work for in g etion instructions and are planned and provided sents. Liork authorizing docu- authorizing dociaments (es. Pro- procedures regarding procure- for in controlling docu-ments (eg, procedures,1.astruc- cedures, instructions, maintenance ment acticas. In addition, should ments has not been alterco tions, maintenance work orders) work crdere) are reviewed in the provision = of Section 10.2.7 or reduced. There is no are reviewed by the feuclear accordance with establisted of this QAPD ever Le exercised, reductim in cemitmect.
Assurance Department in criteria to do the following the 04 Department eight not be See Item 8.
accordance with established as necessary ... the inspection pisoning agency criteria to do oc following and would not need to perform as necessarys... this review. See Item 8.
59 Page 44 Page 44 5ection 10.7.4 See t ton 10.2.4 Inspection requirements are Inspection requirements are Because of changes in Item 8 The requirement for pro-specifle. in procedurew, instruc- specified in procedures, instruc- refere. ace is now made to the vistae or concurrence with tions, drawings or checklists tioes, drawings or checklists and "authorized inspection planning inspection requirements has and are either provided or con- are elaer provided or concurred organization." As indicated in not been altered or reduced.
curred with by the hclear with by the authorized inspection Item 57, this may set in all Nre than one organization Assurance Department. They pl.a.rs.ing organtration. They cases be the QA Department. may perform this funce ton, (procedures, etc) provide for (procedures, etc) provide for the but there is no reduction the following as appropriates following as appropriate s in commitment.
59 Page 44 Page 44 Section 10.2.5 Section 10.2.5 Inspection points are designated Tespection points are designated As indicated above, in items 57 The requirements for use by the helear Assurance Depart- as mandatory hold points by desig- and 58, the QA Department may and discharge of mandatory ment as mandatory hold points nated inspection personnel when not be involved in establishing hold point inspections when confirmation is needed that confirmation is needed that the hold points related to procure- are not altered or reduced.
the work accomplis 1.e4 up to that work accomplished up tc tnat point ments. Thus, the more general Depending on the activity.
point is acceptable before the is acceptable before the work can terminology keeps the require- more than one organization work can te allowed to proceed be allowed to proceed further. ments as originally established may be involved.
further. Hold point inspections Hold point inspections are per- without being escessively are performed, and work is formed, and work is released for prescriyttve.
released for further processing further processing or use, by or use, by designated inspection designated inspection personnel.
e personnel. Hold points may be Hold points may be waived only waived only by designated helear by the designated inspection Assurance Department personnel, planning crganization.
MIO988-0110A-TP01 20
. ~ - - - . _ - - - --. _ - . . _ - _._ ~ . - - - . - - - - - - - _- . . - - - - -~ . - . - ~ . .. _ _ - _ _ .
l I
AZIA000ET 2
- WALITY ASS 11 TAM 2 PROGRA?! DESG1PTION (CPC-2A)
Revision 7 Revision 8 Reason for Chaere Basis for Conclusion 60 Page 44 Page 44 kction 10.7.7b Sect ion 10.2.7b The qualification criteria for The qualification criteria for the This change establishes minimman This is an increase in the inspection personnel have inspection personnel have been qualification criteria f.>r use commitment in that the been reviewed and found reviewed and found acceptable by of a "peer inspection" program. QAFD now more clearly acceptable by the Nuclear the Qaality Assurance bepartment. spw ifies the acceptance Assurance Department. Minimum criteria are that individ- criteria to be used in uals performing inspection must review of peer inspector possess qualifications at least quailfication programs.
equal to those of the persons authorized to perform the task (s) that will be inspe4+ed. -
61 Page 5? Page 51 Sectis.n 14.2.1 Section 14.2.3 l Appilcation and removal of Applicrtion and removal of 1 spec- The change recognizes that some The requirements to properly i inspection and welding stamps tion and welding stamps and of nonplant groups also control control status indicators
! and of such status Indicators such status indicators as tags, application and removal of some Save not been altered ce as tags, markings, labels, markings, labels, etc, are con- of the items listed (eg. Field reduced, l
etc, are controlled by plant trolled by procedures. l Maintenance Services, contracters procedures, working onsite). Thus "plant" procedores would not apply.
62 Page 53 Page 53 Sectson 15.2.1b sect ton 15.2.Ib The Nuclear Assurance Department The origin.a1 inspection plann'ng As indicated in hens 57, 58 and The requirements for handling
, reviews the dispcsition of authority reviews the disposition 59, the QA Department may not be the disposition of noncen-nonconformances, and documents of nonconformances, and documents the original inspection planning forming items have not been l
cencurrence with the acceptance, concurrence with the acceptance, authority for procurement activ- altered or reduced.
conditional release or repair conditional release or repair of ities. This change retains the l of a nonconforming item, a nonconforming 1*es. requirement, but allows more than i one organization to be the "original inspection planning authority."
l I
l I
l N10966-0110A-TP01 21 l
i i _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . - - _ . - _ . . _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - _ . _- _ _ _ _ - - - . _ _ _ . - - .. - _ .- _ _ -_
.----=-- - . . . - - . .__~.- - - --- - - - . - - - ~ ~ . . _ . = - - - , _ . ._. .. . - - - - - __
)
ATTAOIMENT 2 ,
(fALITY ASSULANCT. PROCP AM DESOt1PTION (Q'C-2A)
~
Revisi m 7 Revision A Reason for thmege Basis for Cone?usion 63 Page 53 Page 53 sect i wi 15. 2.1c Sectice 15.2.1c Items that have been repaired Items that have been repaired or See item 62. h reapairements for con +
ar reworn.ed cre inspected and reworked are inspected and tested currence with alternate tested in accordance with the in accordance with the origirst acceptance criteria have original inspection and test inspection and test requirements not been altered or reduced, requirements or alternatives or alternatives that have been that have been documeested as documented as acceptable and acceptable and c m rred with concurred with by the original by the Nuclear Assurance inspection plannisig authority.
Department.
64
.* age 53 Page 53 Section 15.2J 5ection 15.7.le No stellar ites i Revision 7. N Quality Assurance Department This change specifically pro- This is an increase in verities through audit or sur- vides for the QA Depart. ment to consmitment in that welllance that, staen it is rat verify that other orgn:f ra- additfonal, specific the original inspection planning tions acting as "originst audit and surveillance mutterity, the 11spositions of inspection planntrg authority" triteria a e established.
15.2.lb and the alternate accep- are meeting established tance criteria of 15.2.Ic are re wirements.
being prcperly performed and revie ed.
65 Page $4 Page 54 Sect Ion 15.2.4 Section 15.7.4 h Euclear Assurance Department Nonconformance reports are As indicated above,the QA h requirement to maalyze analyzes nonconformance reports anadyzed to identify qua~ity Department is not the only nonconform.snees for trends to identify quality trends, trends. Trend reports, which group involved with control has not been altered or Trend reports, sdaich 1.lgblight highlight significant results, of nonconforming items, and reduced. The chan,e makes significant results, are issued are issued periodically to so is responsible only for the requirement gene'.all) periodically to urger management upper augement for revia trending those nonconformances applicable.
for review and assessnes.t. and assessmen'. with which it is associated.
h change makes the analysis requirement generally applic-able, as opposed to restricting it to one department.
M10988-0110A-TP01 20
. _ _ - . _ _ _ - - _ _ _ . ~ . _ - ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . , . _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ , __ _ _ ,
ATTAOcENT 2
- QUALITY ASSURAEE PROGRAM 1ESCRIPTION (CPC-2A)
Revisirm 7 Revision 8 Reason for (hange Basis for Conclusion 66 Page 60 Pa e 60 Sect im 18.2.11 ect on 18.2.11 Audits of operations 1 nuclear Audits of ogrational nuclear This is a name change related to The requirement to conduct safety-related facility safety-related facility activ- Item 10. the audit orogram with the activities r.all a be performed itles shall be performed under involvement of the of fsite under the cognizance of Nuclear the cognizance of Nucicar Safety revi2w body is not altered Safety Board (NSB). Services Department, of reduced.
67 Page 63 Pa e 63 Item ), Escept ion / Int erpretat ion tem , Esception/ Interpretation (E/I) (E/T), Second FaragraIid No second paragraph in Revision 7. Imposition of these Regulatory This change moved a statement The statement of post tion See item 76, below. Guides on CP Co suppliers and from one location in Appendix A , continues in force as subtier suppliers will be on a Part 2, to this locatian. This before. Only the location case-by-case basis depending location is felt to be more has changed, upon the item or service to be correct sa the title of this procuwd. Exception / Interpretation is "Ceneral," and the ,tatement is a general position app 11-cable to all Regulatory Guides committed to in CPC-2A, 68 Pare 63 Pa e 63 Item 2, E/I tem , E /I Consumcrs Power Company has Consmers Power Company taas This change recognizes the The level of commitment is established both an organiza- established an organizational change described in item 10, not reduced by c. hanging tional unit and a standing unit, Nuclear Safety Services that Che now has an organt- from a standing committee comunittee for independent lepartment (NSSD), for inde- zational unit, not a standing to an organizational unit review activities. Together pendent review activities. committee,as the offsite to meet the applicable re-tisey form the independent review body. The limitations quirementa, since the re-review body. The standard numeric and as to membership number and quirements (A!tSI N18.7) qualification requirements qualifications are retained. allow for this approach.
The standard numeric and may not be met try the NSSD. l qualification requirement may Procedures will be established not be met by each group in- to specify how NSSD will ac-dividually. Procedures will be quire necessary expertire tn established to specify how each carry out its review respon-group will be involved in review sibilities in accordance with activities. Plant Technical Specifications.
M10988-0110A-TP01 23
-_-.m - m._ .- _ __ _ . _ _ _ ._.__ _ _ m . - .. _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . . - _ _ -. _. __ _.___ . _ _.
$ AITAQDCfr 2
- QJALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION (GC-2A) i Revision 7 Revision 8 Reason for Qaange Basis for Conclusion l
' 69 1
, E/1 , E/I Nuclear Safety - Nuclear Nuclear Safety Services Depart- See items 10 and 68. See item 68. Also, Plant Assurance Department will not ment will not have members Technical Specifications have members specified try specified by number or by are recogniaed as having
- mmber or by technical disci- technical disciplines and its relevance to offsite re-p11nes and its members may not members may not have the view activities, have the experience and compe- experience and competence re-tence required to review prob- quired to review probicas in i tess in all areas listed in this all areas listed in this section; seetion; however the Nuclear however, the MSSD will functton Safety Board (NSB) will be as described in Plaat Technical I specified ty number and Spwifications and will acquire discipline. the service s of personnel having such emperience and competence The NSB will not specifically as necessary.
include a enember qualified in Nondestrtictive Testing but will use qualified technical con-sultants to perform this func-tion as determined necessary by the NSE Oaalrean.
70 Page 64 Page 64 ,
Item 2c, C<urnlete No Item f Fw 4.3.2.1 This item is not included in Since CPCo no longer uses a See Item 68.
Revision 8. standing ccannittee for inde-Fequirem<nt pendes.t review, this Exception /
Interpretation is no longer
- %cn a standing committee is applicable.
responsible for the independent review program, it shall be camposed of no less than five persons of whom no more than a minority are members of the ensite operating organization. ,
Campetent alternatives are bruitted if designated in advance. The use of alternates
$1.all be restricted to legitimate absences of principals."
MIO9884)110A-TP01 24 t
.- _ _ - ------ . - _ . - - - - . . - , . . . - _ . . . - _ . - - - . - . - - - , - - = - - - , _ , -~ , ..-,,n ,- - n_ - . - . - . , . , . - - - . - , , . _ . . , , . - , -
.____m ___.__m_._ _ _ _ . _ - - , -_____m _ _ _ .. _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ . - _ _ . _
ATTAC19ENT 2
- ocAuTT ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESOGPHON (CPC-2A)
Revision 7 Revision 8 Reason for Change Basis for Conclusion Emcept ion / Interpret at ion See Item 2, General 71 l Pare 65 Pa e 65 Item 2f, E/I res_ , E/I The Nuclear Safety Board (ESB) The Nuclear Safety Services This is a name change related See Itam 10.
will not review Technical Department will not review to Item 10.
Specification Oranges af ter ERC Technical Specification approval prior to implementatten. O.anges af ter ERC approval l The basis str this position is prior to implementation. The that NSB reviews all Tect.nical basis for this position is that Specification changes prior to NSSD reviews all Technical outmittal to the NRC. Specification changes prior to sutaittal to the 13C.
12 Pay 65 Page 65 '
Item 2g, C(mplete Ma Iten Sec 4.4 "his item is not included in As part of the chany in The requireacnt to dich Revision 8. Item 10, above, the func- clarification was origi-Fequirement tions of Nuclear Safety - RAD nally made is now met.
that were performed as plant Thus, there is no reduction "The onsite operating organi- support functions were in ccessitoent.
zation shall provide, as part actually transferred to plant of the normal duties of plant cont rol . Thus, the original supervisory personnel,..." requirement is now met and the Exception / Interpretation Except ton / Interpret at ton is no longer applicable. (See also Item 9.)
Some of the responsibilities of the onsite operating organization descr.ted to Section 4.4 may he carried out try Nuclear Safety - NAD as descrited in Plant Technical Specifications.
73
, E/1 , E/1 Audits of operaticanal nuclear Audits of cperational nuclear This is a name change related See Item 10.
safety related facility safety reisted facility to item 10.
activities ate performed under activities are performed under MIO988-0110A-TPCI 25
AITAOffXT 2 ,
QUALITT ASSQtANCE FROGRAM DESGIFTION (CPC-2A)
Revision 7 Revision 81 Reason for Change Basis for Conclusim the cognizance of the of f site the cognizance of the of fsite hclear Safety Board as hcicar safety Services Desert-described in individual Plant ment as described in individual Tett.nical Specifications. Plant Technical Specifications.
74 Pa e 69 Page 69 tra , E /1 lten G. E/1 The corrective action system The corrective action system he independent review body Ibe requirement for review trend reports are reviewed trend reporte are reviewed by (hcicar Safety Services Depart- of trend reports continues by the independent review the independent review body. l ment) now reviews all trend to be met, tnat at an in-teody twice annually. In ad- In addition, the corrective reports as they arUssued, in- creased frequency. De dition, the corrective action action syst s is audited at stead of only twice annually. ESSD will review all trend system is audited at least least once every two years reports. Thus, there is once every two years with with additiosal audits and no reduction in commitment, additional audits and in- investigations performed as vestigations performed as indf cated necessary t<y the indicated necetsary by the trend report reviews.
trend report reviews.
75 Page 71 Page 71 ho item Item 7c, Complete h sinflar its was in- Sec 3.4.1 and Appendix A, This change recognizes and his change was previously c1uded in Revision 7. 3.4.1(4) and (5) corrects an error found in approved by Mtc correspon-the specific version of desce dated March 1,1988.
Requirement ANSI E45.2.2 to which CPCo is committed.
- (4) ... h wever, preserva-tives for inaccessible inside surf aces containing reactor coolant water shall be in-dicated to facilitate touch-up.
l (5) The name of the preserva-tive used shall be the water ilushable type."
Escept ton / Int erpraat ton Based en commarisce as these statements to ANSI /AS?E NQA-21983, CP Co believes the intent was to establish the following as requirements:
MIO988-0110A-7701 26 i i
4
. - -- - - - - - - - - . - , . - _ . ~ . . _ . - . . ~ . - . . - - - , , - - . - . - - . - - . - - - - _ - - . - . - - - , . - , . , - . - - , - . . _ . , , -.
l
~
l ATTAOD1ENT 2 ,
Qt'ALITY ASSL7.ANCE PROGUL*1 DESGIFTI05 (CPC-2A)
Reviston 7 Revision 8 Reason for mange Rasis fer Gmelusion (4) ... Ennever, preservatives for inaccessible inside surfaces of pssps, valves and pipe for systems cataining ruter t coolar t water shall be the l water flushable type.
- 45) The name of the preservative used shall be provided to l facilitate touchnap.
76 Pepe 77 Page 77 Item 12e, Complete . ho Ites Ceneral Imposition of these Regulatory This item (12e) is not in- See Item 67. See Item 67.
Cuides on GCo suppliers and cluded as a separate item in sut: tier suppliers will be on Revision 8 See Item 67, a case-by-case t. asis depersfing above.
upon the ites or service to be procured.
77 Page 78 race 78 lten I M, E/I Item I M, E/I thulpment may be installed Equipment may te installed the terminology "declared The thrust of the Excep-lefore final approval of bef ore final approval of operable" is more properly tion / Interpretation is engineering or design c*aanges. engineering or design used in this context. A not changed. The terms Hewver, the system is not changes, llowever, tte sys- system or component may be used are more consistent placed into service until tem is not declared operable l "in service," fe, usable for with actual practice.
such changes are doctamented unt ti such changes are some functions, tmt not be There is no reduction and approved. documented and approved, capable of performing its in commitment.
Intended safety function.
Such system or cosrponent thus wcasid not be "declared operable." Only systems and equipment that are clearly capable of performing their intended safety function are declared operable.
HIO988-0110A-TP01 27
_