ML20235H639
| ML20235H639 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden, Byron, Braidwood, Quad Cities, Zion, LaSalle, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 02/25/1987 |
| From: | Shewski W COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20235H586 | List: |
| References | |
| CE-1-A, CE-1-A-R44, NUDOCS 8707150212 | |
| Download: ML20235H639 (36) | |
Text
n.
b4; CE-1-A Topical Report January 1976 Rev. 44 - 2/25/87 l
l C' COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY.
l QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM l
FOR NUCLEAR GENERATING STATIONS k
l:
i i
l l
l s
)
I COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY l
I 1
Post Office Box 767 l-i Chicago, Illinois 60690 l
f$7150212B70225 c-p ADOCK 0500001o PDR
'~
t j
l i
1 C________
j
l I
LISTING COVERING REVISION OF TOPICAL REPORT CE-1 Below is a listing of Revision 44 changes to the Commonwealth Edison Company Quality Assurance Program Topical Report CE-1-A dated 2/25/87:
i Rev. Contents Pages 1-3, Page Nos.
1-7, 1-8, 1-12, l-17, 1-18, 1-19, 1-26, 1-27, 1-37, 1-38, 1-41, 1-43, 3-2, 3-2, 4-3, 7-1, 11-3, 18-1 and 18-2.
(
Approved:
//A J.2 5-87 Mansger of Quality Assurance 2/25/87 l
9518M
EXPLANAT10N OF CHANGES FOR TOPICAL REPORT - REV. 44.
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY PROGRAM TOPICAL REPORT CE-1-A PAGE NO.
EXPLANATION-1-7, 1-8 Revised to reflect Quality Assurance organization changes.
i J
1-12, 1-17, 1-18, 1-19 Revised to reflect the combination, in certain instances, of the responsibilities of Director of Quality Assurance and Site Quality Assurance Superintendent.
1-26, 1-27 Revised by moving certain responsibilities of the Station Manager q
to the Production Superintendent due to a change in the modification process.
I 1-37, 1-38, 1-41, 1-43 Revised to reflect current Quality Assurance organization as a result of the completion and licensing of the Byron project.
1 3-2 Reissued due to a typographical error.
No change to text.
3-3 Changed Station Manager to Production Manager due to a change in the modification process.
l 4-3 Reissued due to a typographical error.
l No change to text.
7-1 Reissued due to a typographical error, No change to text.
l 11-3 Broadened the responsibilities of the Technical Staff Supervisor and the Assistant Superintendent Operating relative to test results.
Also added the words."or designee".
18-1, 18-2 Reissued due to a typographical error.
No change to text.
0012M
CONTENTS
~
TITLE PAGE REY.
DATE INTRODUCTION 1-1 2
10/25/77
- 1. ORGANIZATION A. Basic Organization Responsibilities 1-1 2
10/25/77 1-2 26 12/10/83 B. Organizational Responsibilities for Major Activities 1-3 21 06/06/82 1-4 35 06/05/85 1-5 42 11/21/86 1-6 42 11/21/86 1-7 44 02/25/87 1-8 44 02/25/87 1-9 42 11/21/86 1-10 40 02/28/86 1-11 28 03/16/84 1-12 44 02/25/87 1-13 28 03/16/84 l
1-14 40 02/28/86 1-15 40 02/28/86 1-16 28 03/16/84 1-17 44 02/25/87 1-18 44 02/25/87 1-19 44 02/25/87 1
1-20 28 02/16/84 1-21 38 10/03/85
)
1-22 42 11/21/86 1-23 40 02/28/86 1-24 40 02/28/86 1-25 40 02/28/86 j
1-26 44 02/25/87 1-27 44 02/25/87 1-28 34 04/10/85 1-29 34 04/10/85 1-30 34 04/10/85 1-31 34 04/10/85 1-32 34 04/10/85 1-33 34 04/10/85 1-34 37 08/20/85 1-35 38 10/03/85 1-36 40 02/28/86 FIGURES 1-0 Organization Chart Related To Q. A.
1-37 44 02/25/87 1-1 Organization Chart - Quality Assurance 1-38 44 02/25/87 1-2 Station Construction Department 1-39 42 11/21/86 1-2.1 CECO Nuclear Generating Station Site 1-40 12/29/80 Organization Interface Relationships 1-3 Station Nuclear Engineering Department 1-41 44 02/25/87 1-4 Projects Department 1-42 40 02/28/86 1-5 Operational Analysis Department 1-43 44 02/25/87 and Materials Analysis Department 1-6 Production 1-44 42 11/21/86 1-7 Station Production Department Organization 1-45 42 11/21/86 Page 1 of 3 Date:
2/25/87 Rev. 44
CONTENTS TITLE PAGE REV.
DATE
- 2. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 2-1 43 12/22/86 2-2 42 11/21/86 2-3 39 11/20/85 2-4 19 08/07/81-2-5 43 12/22/86 2-6 32 10/05/84 2-7 33 03/13/85 2-8 29 04/20/84
- 3. DESIGN CONTROL 3-1 32 10/05/84 3-2 38 10/03/85 3-3 44 02/25/87 3-4 42 11/21/86
- 4. PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL 4-1 33 03/13/85 4-2 42 11/21/86 4-3 42 11/21/86 4-4 42 11/21/86 4-5 16 03/16/81 k
5.'
INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND DRAWINGS 5-1 39 11/20/85 5-2 39 11/20/85 5-3 36 06/19/85 l
- 6. DOCUMENT CONTROL 6-1 32 10/05/84 6-2 26 12/10/83 6-3 39 11/20/85'
- 7. CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES 7-1 42 11/21/86 4
7-2 42 11/21/86 j
7-3 32 10/05/84 7-4 18 07/12/81 7-5 42 11/21/86 7-6 18 07/12/81
- 8. IDENTIFICATION AND CONTPOL OF MATERIALS, PARTS AND COMPONENTS 8-1 42 11/21/86 8-2 10 09/28/79 l
- 9. CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES 9-1 15 01/02/81 l
9-2 32 10/05/85 9-3 42 11/21/86 i
- 10. INSPECTION 10-1 42 11/21/86 10-2 42 11/21/86 10-3 33 03/13/85 l
- 11. TEST CONTROL 11-1 15 01/02/81 l
11-2 41 08/12/86 l
11-3 44 02/25/87 11-4 39 11/20/85 Page 2 of 3 Date: 2/25/87 Rev. 44 I
i L
i
1 I
-CONTENTS TITLE PAGE' REV.
DATE
- 12. CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT.
12-1 42 11/21/86' l
12-2 42 11/21/86 12-3 39 11/20/85
).j
- 13. HANDLING, STORAGE AND SHIPPING 13-1 26 12/10/83 13-2 26 12/10/83 13-3 11 12/21/79 14.. INSPECTION, TEST AND OPERATING STATUS 14-1 42 11/21/86 14-2 26 06/19/85
- 15. NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS OR' COMPONENTS OPERATIONS 15-1' 26 12/10/83 j
15-2 39 11/20/85 15-3 39 11/20/85
'16. CORRECT.'VE ACTION 16-1 29 04/20/84 16-2 38 10/03/85 16-3 15 01/02/01 i
'17.' QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS 17-1 26 12/10/83 17-2 39 11/20/85
- 18. LDITS 18-1 42 11/21/86 18-2 35 06/05/85 18-3 40 02/28/86
.I APPENDIX A A-1 Quality Assurance Program Manual Index A-1 Quality Assurance Procedures Manual A-2 l
Index (Engineering and Construction)
Quality Assurance Procedures Manual A-3 Index (Operations)
Page 3 of 3'
Date: 2/25/87 Rev. 4_4 Approved:
2.45-87 9522M Manalyer of Quality Assurance
._--..--..a_.
- ~ -, - -
2-_---
been issued a full power operating license and has by mutual $greement l
.been turned over from the Vice President (Manager of Projects) to the l
Vice President of Nuclear Operations for the activities involving l
l design, test procedures and plant modifications for the Commonwealth Edison Company (CECO) nuclear power generating stations.
The Operational Analysis Manager and the Materials Analysis Manager, both reporting to the Assistant Vice President who in turn reports to the i
Vice President (Engineering), is responsible, respectively, for the i
testing activities of the Operational Analysis and Materials Analysis
/
Departments and have functional responsibility and control, respectively, of the Operational Analysis and Materials Analysis j
testing activities during construction and plant operations.
The Manager of Quality Assurance directs the quality assurance activities for the design, procurement, construction and operation ot the Company's nuclear power facilities and interface activities with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Inspection and Enforcement, Region III and the Authorized Inspection Agency.
He, or a
- 44 {
designated alternate, is delegated responsibility and authority to stop unsatisfactory work and plant operations as well as further pro _<3 sing or unsatisfactory material during design, engineering and construction of the plant, and during plant modification, maintenance and in-service j
inspection activities.
Release of stop work orders shall be by the l
individual who placed the stop work or by a Quality Assurance i
Department higher authority and shall have the concurrence of the l
Manager of Quality Assurance or.is designee.
l s
All QA personnel shall have the responsibility and authority f
to cease an in-process operation / installation as necessary, when a j
violation of the applicable QA Program, procedure, specification or' 3
drawing is identified.
Work will be permitted to proceed after j
implementation of necessary corrective action to bring the in-process installation / operation into conformance has been verified,by Quality Assurance, i
If conditions, which are adverse to quality and which require l
prompt action are found by Quality personnel at the site or Station and required corrective measures can not be agreed upon, the Manager of I
Quality Assurance or his designated alternate, will be notified promptly.
\\
The Director of Quality Assurance (Engineering-Construction) j reports to the Manager of Quality Assurance.
The Operations Quality j
Assurance Manager reports to the Manager Quality Assurance.
The l
Director of Quality Assurance (Operating) and the Director Quality Assurance (Maintenance) report to the Operations Quality Assurance Manager.
The Director of Quality Assurance (Engineering-Construction) has responsibility for administering design, procurement and construction quality assurance activities, the Operations Quality Assurance Manager has responsibility for administering operating quality assurance activities.
The Director Quality Assurance (Operating) has responsibility for administering operating quality assurance activities, and the Director of Quality Assurance (Maintenance) has responsibility for quality assurance activities covering maintenance, modification, in-service inspection 1-7 Rev. 44 I
2/25/87 Commonwealth Edison
and Stores activities.
They all have authority and organizational freedom to identify problems and to initiate, recommend or provide solutions.
The Quality Assurance organization is independent of the groups and individuals directly responsible for performing specific activities to which such quality assurance is applicable.
The qualification requirements for the position of Manager of Quality Assurance includes having a broad background and working
)
knowledge of nuclear plant engineering, construction and operaring activities within Commonwealth Edison Company as well as functional interfaces with working organizations outside the company plus having executive capabilities to achieve goals and objectives in concert with company policies.
Also required is knowledge of Quality Assurance regulations, policies, practices and Standards and experience working in Quality Assurance or related activity in reactor design, construction or operation or in a similar high technology industry.
Educational requirements include, as a minimum, a baccalaureate degree or equivalent in Engineering or related science.
" Equivalent" is considered to be commensurate with the factors described in paragraph 4.1 (items a-j) of ANS-3.1-1981.
The Manager of Quality Assurance shall have (4) years experience in j
the field of quality assurance, or equivalent number of years of nuclear plant experience in a supervisory position preferably at an j
operating nuclear plant or a combination of the two.
At least one (1) year of this four years experience shall include detailed involvement in the administration of and adherence to the Quality Assurance program in a significant technical management responsibility directly involving nuclear power plants, such as engineering, construction, operation, etc.
Job requirements for the positions of Operations Quality Assurance Manager, and Directors of Quality Assurance include having a broad background and working knowledge of engineering, construction and operating activities with Commonwealth Edison Company as well as having a knowledge of codes and standards applicable to power plant design, construction and operation and quality assurance principles.
They also shall have supervisor and management qualities and capabilities.
Educational requirements shall include a baccalaureate degree or equivalent in engineering or 3
a combination of an equivalent technical discipline.
The equivalent technical discipline and work experience requirements for the Directors of Quality Assurance (Maintenance or Operating) as well as j
Quality Assurance Superintendents and Supervisors of Quality
- u Assurance may be fulfilled by a combination of education, Quality Assurance and related experience, taking into account past work performance, proficiency, totalling about five years.
I The Executive Vice President for Construction, Production l
and Engineering directs the activities of departments responsible for licensing, construction, construction testing, plant operations, i
nuclear and other engineering training and environmental affairs.
In this capacity he is responsible for the activities of l
departments and divisions concerned with the operations, maintenance l
and nuclear engineering of the Company's generating facilities as l
well as control over the bulk power transmission system.
The depart-I ments and divisions and the person responsible for activity within-each are as follows:
1-8 Rev. 44 2/25/87 Commonwealth Edison
j
'1.4.1 (Cont'd)- The respective Project Engineer directs and coordinates the associated activities under his or her scope of work.-
The Project Engineering Project Engineer is responsible i
for the following responsibilities:
a.
Review ~and control the scope of work involving the electrical, mechanical,
. structural and instrumentation, and j
control designs of.the NSSS vendor and Architect Engineer to verify that appli-cable' Safety Analysis Report (SAR),
regulatory requirements,'ASME Code requirements, and design bases.are properly translated into specifications, drawings,-procedures and instructions.
b.
_ Review and accept the specifications, drawings,-and' scope for electrical, mechanical and structural material, equipment and erection work,. prepared
)
by the Architect Engineer and NSSS 1
I vendor, to verify inclusion of inspec-tion, testing and' acceptance criteria.
c.
Analyze bids, make purchase recommenda-tions, control expenditures and assure i
that necessary quality requirements are included in purchase orders and contracts.
i i
d.
Disposition of electrical, mechanical and structural design changes, e.
Review the Architect Engineer's evalua-tion of fabricator's and erector's detailed designs, drawings and work
]
instructions for reasonableness and completeness, f.
Review and approve resolution of noncon-formances relating to electrical, mecha-nical and structural. portions of the generating' station.
g.
Establish the plans for the preopera-tional and start-up test programs, h.
Coordinate the preparation and review of preoperational and start-up test procedures.
1-11 Rev. 28
- 28 3/16/84 Commonwealth Edison
1.4.1 (Cont'd) i.
Coordinate the evaluation of the adequacy of the results of the preoperational and start-up testing.
Mtke recommendation for acceptance of test results when results are i
judged satisfactory.
I j..
Develop overall achedules, i
The Project Field Engineering Manager is responsible for engineering design implementation, reviewing systems for modification and deficiencies, resolving construction problems and coordinating and J
overseeing the Architect-Engineer field group I
plus, where assigned for review and comment of l
on-site contractor Quality Instructions and Procedures and for review and evaluation of j
CECO nonconformances.
Similarly, once the nuclear unit has been issued a full power operating license and has by mutual agreement been turned over from the Vice President (Manager of Projects) to the Vice President of Nuclear Operations, the Station Nuclear Engineering Department Project Engineer is responsible for the responsibilities listed above as applicable for plant modification and completion of the pre-operational and/or start-up testing program.
)
The Station Nuclear Engineering Manager has overall Owner's responsibility for the Form N-3 1
Data Report and other CECO N type Data Reports including stamping responsibility for ASME Section III, Division 1 and 2 covering concrete i
containments.
The Station Nuclear Engineering i
Manager assigns the CECO responsibilities for the Form N-5 and C-1 Data Reports, including stamping, to the Project Manager during initial design and construction.
The Station Nuclear Engineering Manager assigns the NA and NPT.
responsibilities for Code adherence to the l
Nuclear Station Superintendent in connection with the extension of the corporate certificate, i
1.4.2 The Quality Assurance Coordinator assigned to Station l
Nuclear Engineering Department and Project Eng'ineering has the responsibility to assure that the following I
quality assurance activities are performed.
(Also see 1.4.7.1.A)
- 44 a.
Development of quality procedures to be used by Station Nuclear Engineering and Project Engineering in the Commonwealth Edison Quality Assurance Program.
1-12 Rev. 44 2/25/87 Commonwealth Edison
y l
The Materials Analysis Department pro 51 des or contracts specialized chemistry, metallurgy, nondestructive examination and vibration analysis services and materials-f expertise through its technical staff specialists.
The Company Level III NDE l
person is assigned to this Department.
1.4.6.3 The Quality J.ssurance Coordinator assigned' to the Operational Analysis and Material' l
Analysis Departments has the responsibility to assure that the following quality.
assurance activities are performed:
a.
Calibration is performed on test and measurement equipment as required.
b.
Auditing is performed of destructive and nondestructive testing as directed.
c.
Nondestructive test personnel qualifica-tions records are maintained, d.
Auditing is performed of calibration services vendors.
1.4.7 Director of Quality Assurance (Engineering-Construction)
The Director of Quality Assurance (Engineering-Construction) reports to the Manager of Quality Assurance and is responsible for administration of the Commonwealth Edison Company Quality Assurance; program Requirements and procedures ~ established for the design and construction phase of nuclear power generating j
stations.
Specifically, he will direct the efforts of the Construction Site Quality Assurance activities'and
- u provide functional direction to each Quality Assurance Coordinator assigned to the Station Nuclear Engineering, Project Engineering, Materials Analysis and Operational Analysis Departments.
He maintains a cognizance o( the Operations portion of the Quality Assurance Program to determine that it interfaces with the design and construction quality assurance phases.
He, or a
- u j
designee, shall serve as liaison with quality assurance organizations of the NSSS Vendor, Architect Engineer, Authorized Inspector and Contractors - as necessary - to verify that compliance with the applicable Codes, Standards and Regulations are. met.
This Director of j
Quality Assurance (Engineering-Construction) will l
regularly inform the Manager of Quality Assurance.of significant quality assurance development and problem 1-17 Rev. 44 2/25/87 Commonwealth Edison
1 1
areas.
The Director of Quality Assurance (Engineering-Construction) has sufficient authority to identify problem areas and require corrective action.
1.4.7.1 Site Quality Assurance, Superintendent (Engineering-Construction)
Each Site Quality Assurance Superintendent reports to the Director of Quality Assurance (Engineering-Construction) or, where this Superintendent job position responsibilities
- u are combined into such Director position, to the Manager of Quality Assurance and is responsible for the quality activities within his specific department.
He is responsible to observe and inform the Director of Quality Assurance (Engineering-Construction), or the
+4 l
l Manager of Quality Assurance, where applicable, of any deficiency involving required Safety l
Analysis Reports, Quality Assurance Manual l
Reports, design reports, construction reports l
and test reports.
Reporting to such Superintendents, where established as site activities deem necessary, are the site Supervisors Quality Assurance.
The Site Quality Assurance Superintendent or other established lead person, as applicable,
- 4 is responsible for reviews and audits to assure i
that the above requirements are met and that j
nonconformances are resolved.
l l
A.
Engineering - In addition to the responsibi-lities stated herein, under Section 1.4.2,
- 4 i
the Quality Assurance Coordinator assigned to the Station Nuclear Engineering Department and Project Engineering is responsible for surveil-lance and audit of Engineering activities involving construction projects and operating nuclear plants for conformance to requirements.
He maintains surveillance of required documenta-tion of modifications activities at operating stations where Station Nuclear Engineering Department responsibility is involved.
His responsibilities are achieved through project review, surveillance and day-to-day involvement plus by support, involvement and action, functionally, by the Director of Quality
- u Assurance (Engineering-Construction), and by the Manager of Quality Assurance.
l l
l 1-18 Rev. 44 2/25/89 Commonwealth Edison
i B.
Operational' Analysis and Materials Analysis -
The Quality Assurance Coordinator assigned to the Operational Analysis Department and the Materials Analysis Department is respon-sible for assuring that calibration proce-dures and records are maintained for Nuclear Station Test and Measurement equipment.
He also maintains surveillance of required documentation of their respective testing and inspection activities.
His responsi-bilities are achieved essentially in the same manner as stated for the Quality Assurance Coordinator assigned to Engineering except he reports to a Quality Assurance Superintendent and, in turn, the Manager of Quality Assurance with functional
- 4 administration by the Director of Quality j
Assurance (Engineering-Construction).
C.
Construction Site - The Site Quality Assur-ance Group will vary with the volume of quality oriented activity at the site.
Generally, the number will vary from one to twenty or more; although, in the pre-con-struction and early and closing stages of construction a Supervisor Quality Assurance or a Site Quality Assurance Coordinator or Engineer may perform these activities alone.
The Site Quality Assurance Superintendent or other site Quality Assurance designee is J
responsible for assuring necessary procure-ment requirements are provided in CECO site procurement packages involving safety-related and ASME Code purchases, off-site vendor inspections and surveillance, surveillance of site contractor quality activities, compliance of material and equipment with procurement document requirements, mainten-ance of quality records filed at the site and direction of the site quality assurance group activities.
These responsibilities will be achieved using Quality Assurance Engineers or Inspectors through review, surveillance and audit activities, continued monitoring and day-to-day involvement.
The Site Quality Assurance Superintendent and, in turn, the Supervisors Quality Assurance reporting to such Superintendents have the responsibility that the following quality assurance activities are performed:
1-19 Rev. 44 2/25/87 Commonwealth Edison
a.
Development and approval of site contractor construction quality control procedures.
b.
Review and approval of site contractor quality assurance programs including site procedures.
c.
Advise the appropriate Engineering organi-zation of Bidder Quality Assurance capabilities when requested.
d.
Maintain surveillance of site contractors to verify conformance to approved quality control programs and procedures by review, surveillance and audits.
e.
Assure accumulation, filing and mainten-ance of quality assurance documents and records required for site construction by surveillance and audit, f.
Review and acceptance of nondestructive test documentation.
g.
Identification and maintenance of files for site nonconforming items and follow-up and monitor of corrective action required for.
disposition of site nonconformances.
h.
Maintenance of calibration records for test equipment involved in site construction activities through surveillance and audit.
i.
Safekeeping of quality assurance documen-tation during construction by surveillance.
j.
Surveillance and approval by Quality Assur-ance of material receiving reports including assurance required corrective actions are completed, k.
Review by Quality Assurance of on-site contractor surveillance reports for quality problems and completion of corrective actions.
1.
Quality Assurance audit of on-site contractors.
m.
Review and approval of site procurement packages involving safety-related and ASME Code purchases to assure necessary require-
.ments are provided and the proposed vendor (s) is acceptable.
1-20 Rev. 28
- 28 Commonwe/16/84 3 alth Edison
1.5.1.2 DIVISION VICE PRESIDENTS - NUCLEAR STATIONS (Cont'd)
They provide liaison between the Regional Nuclear.
Regulatory Commission's Director of the Office of Inspection and Enforcement and the Office of the Production Department.
They are responsible, through the Station Managers, for.
- the management of each assigned power station.
This includes all activities such as operation, maintenance,,
station security, refueling, authorization'of modifications performed at the Station, performance monitoring and investigation, compliance with procedures, regulations and licenses, personnel selections, training and related activities.
They assign ~ responsibility for preparation and implementation *,
of the Station Procedures Manual, including the Maintenance Procedures,, to the Station Manager, They maintain contacts with similar nuclear' stations of
- other companies and transmit information from them.
regarding operating problems to Commonwealth Edison's Nuclear Stations.
They have common equipment and system problems communicated among stations in a timely. manner.
They have Deviation Report events, Quality Assurance audits, NRC inspection reports'and other significant events.and
- functions reviewed for trends, sffects on other units and corrective actions.
1.5.1.2.1 OPERATIONS MANAGER The Operations Managers are shown in Figure
- 1-6.
These two Managers report to the Division Vice Presidents - Nuclear Stations and have functional responsibilities for day-to-day operation of nuclear stations in a safe and efficient manner and in accordance with Company procedures, NRC Technical Specifications and governmental regulations.
Their responsibilities include coordinating operating policies, providing support to Operations personnel at the stations, and providing functional direction of'the respective Production Superintendent and Assistant Superintendent Operating regarding day-to-day matters.
1-25 Rev. 40 2/28/86 Commonwealth Edison
l i
l.5.1.2.2 STATION MANAGER Each nuclear generating station is managed, through the. Production Superintendent, the l
Services Superintendent and the Industrial Relations Supervisor, respectively, by a Station Manager who is responsible for the management:of the station including industrial i
relations, planning, coordination, direction of the operation, maintenance, refueling and j
technical activities.
The Station Manager is responsible for. Phase III and IV and compliance with the Station's NRC Operating license, government regulations, ASME Code requirements l
and the Company Quality Assurance Program.
He i
also authorizes the use of procedures contained in the Station Procedures Manual, and is responsbile for final approval and distribution of station reports.
He may. delegate these responsibilities as appropriate to the appropriate Superintendents.
Prior to issuance of the operating license, the' production organization provides personnel to support activities of an operating nature where the preoperational test activities, including reviews of test data, are assigned to a separate organization in Projects at the construction site.
Repair and equipment
- u maintenance needing technical review for substitution of equipment are' reviewed by the Station Technical Staff and completed as maintenance activities under station management.
He supervises the Station's on-site review function as provided in the l
Administrative Section 6.0 of the Technical Specification.
During periods when the Station Manager is unavailable, he shall designate this responsibility to an established alternate who satisfies the ANSI N18.1 experience requirements for plant manager.
l.5.1.2.2.1 Industrial Relations Supervisor The Industrial Relations Supervisor reports to the Station Manager and performs various personnel activities as assigned.
1-26 Rev. 44 2/25/87 t
CommonweaHh Edison
1.5.1.3.0 production Superintendent Reports to the Station Manager.
Manages operations and maintenance activities including the day-to-day operations of'the station, both during operating and during outages.
The i
production Superintendent authorizes modifications to the Station after the issuance of an operating license and completion of
- u preoperational testing.
He, or his designee, forwards requests for modifications to the Station Nuclear Engineering Department.
- Also, the Production Superintendent is responsible for controlling the in-plant work of non-station personnel.
Reporting to him are the Assistant Superintendent Operating and Assistant Superintendent Maintenance.
1.5.1.3.1 Assistant Superintendent Operating Responsibility for-the day-to-day operating and refueling activities for the Station is delegated to the Assistant Superintendent Operating. Reporting to him are the Station Operating Engineers and Shift Engineers, plus the Fuel Handling Foremen and the Stationmen Foremen.
1.5.1.3.1.1 Operating Engineers The Operating Engineers are responsible for the operation of the mechanical and electrical equipment and certain common plant systems, such as fuel handling and radioactive waste processing, assigned to them by the Assistant j
Superintendent Operating. They are responsible for recommending maintenance for such equipment and for authorizing functional acceptance tests to be conducted by Operating and Technical Staff personnel.
1.5.1.3.1.2 Shift Engineer The Shift Engineer on duty is responsible for operating the plant in compliance with the station Operating License and the Station Operating Procedures.
During his shift, the Shift Engineer is in charge of the entire plant operation and is responsible for the plant being operated in a safe and reliable condition.
He reports to the Assistant Superintendent Operating.
He receives direction from the Operating Engineers.
1-27 Rev. 44 2/25/87 Commonwealth Edison
l 1.5.1.3.2 Assistant Superintendent Maintenance
- M The Assistant Superintendent Maintenance is
- x responsible for directing the maintenance, l
including repair, of all mechanical and l
electrical equipment including instrumentation.
His responsibility includes planning work, providing on-the-job training of maintenance personnel, maintaining calibration i
listing for maintenance, arranging for the I
maintenance work and its inspection to be performed and initiating requisitions for the l
procurement of tools, materials, equipment and j
parts from vendors and services from contractors.
The Station Stores Supervisor
)
also reports to him.
1.5.1.3.2.1 The Master Instrument Mechanic The Master Instrument Mechanic is responsible for maintaining and repairing I
instrumentation at the Station.
His i
responsibility includes planning work, I
providing on-the-job training of instrument personnel, setting up instruments for tests, maintaining listing of calibrated instruments, arranging for the instrument maintenance work and its inspection to be performed and initiating requi-sitions for i
the procurement of instruments and parts l
from vendors and services from I
l contractors.
The Master Instrument Mechanic reports to the Assistant
- u j
Superintendent Maintenance.
1.5.1.3.2.2 Master Mechanic The Master Mechanic is responsible for maintaining and repairing mechanical equipment and structural equipment at the Station.
His responsibility includes planning work, providing on-the-job training of mechanical maintenance work and its inspection to be performed, and initiating requisitions for the procurement of mechanical and structural parts and components from vendors and services from contractors.
The Master Mechanic reports to the Assistant Superintendent Maintenance.
- M l-28 Rev. 34 4/10/85 Commonwealth Edison L
9
!..i z g n..
- s
- 1.
i ji!! $ $
?
J'ilAE
.,!,jh.
j!1 e
i a ~
ill j
11
![ l inn s
All I i, i i
ni Il j3:j:.
lill 181 !il i
~
i
_t_
__t_ _ t I
1 1
I
.i: ll i
I
.i ll a
n.I s
i T
"g T
-' _". _T_
- ' )
7 I'i I.
1.
gls
- ill'i
- til'-
I lig lug
'il In!
y_
r -- 3
.a
.j!!!
=!-
lii!
l::-
3lill Ill lil
!!!~i
'ili:
i
.;;.../~
t
-+-
9 i
~
S. _ill l
,L i
i
- i.,
i:!
I il i[-:
l li' is
!i il i
il l
l'.}
g,i, -l1-
_j_
T T
1.
Erli v, l1 1.
is
.i
,1
'iis l i!! li
.I !! ds--
-1 si li li si
-ii i
T-TT li 1
is in T l !li ou.
- stE,
- 5' 2 l
3'-
1:n11 1 il I!!
r!= li! _lJrl i
i
.!!!!. !!!l*! !!!
!Ie
!!'i
!i 185 i!!!
igel 1il*
T-T 3
irl; I!i 11:
it.8 l'sj irg ijj;-
11ll i
i;-
i
~~-'
- i!!
8?:
5 i
i l
T-i
- '.!I b
TT
!ji ti!
,j
~~jf l
l 2/25/87 j
(Rev. 44) i; ls,i T
L._-
I b
h at ar Hse I
- Ca I
ts Nu EO$
RIS UI A GA IIY fIl esl Al Ge Ru R
L E
l OQ A
E R F N F
E F I F
N AG A
e T
T t GS E
S l
S T
E N
te E
s E
e A R 3
R OSE r
s
)
rE G
U R C ea F a E rT e
S SO e
t s
n OmC h Y a NHiN S R T A N
cT aI C T O AE C s e
R uA mR A AI E E E I I OS T L E E R T Y e e
t s P T T AE A A uP E A T I S N I
C T
T US UT P T I G I I I E Y N S QAS AOS L s I A s
R T I A E N
I I A U
(
e Q
DL s A
(
E U
r Q
naa N
T Nm R
O R S
O t
O I O R I u
R T
T T E L u
A C
CC T A I
T S A An I
E E
E E UI I
R a
L L P ET P P C a
E Y n C E S R O S ME e
f s
P T s R Ut I R N OP OI I F I F P I C S LA a
U Q
S TN E
2.
E C
e E
e s
C M
A R
)
N)
ED G
R O$S F A S r T s
I U
t N E
E OR N N Ya N HI N S S 0O e
R S I I I mR A AI AE CT I
A OS T T L uE E R T E E A T
s P R N
N R
R T AA AA P
E A Y t A
U
[C R
T US UT P T T I S E M
E D D ES E YE SQAS AOS I G NP R
S R T P L NI O N I A
AS N A I I O A E
(
I A
E A
D L
(
U H
R M Y A
Q C
T U
P I
Q a
tA E
~
U C
Q NT A N R
T RE O
I L
e T 0 eR A P R
4 U
A T G R
A A A t O R
S D e 0 A T O
E C N EO s
c AT I 5 A
a R L E I Y C T N
D E
e A t
s e
YI A.
T t f OE I A t R
T R 0 s I e R W I RE L R i I E 0 n S R 0E P NA Un e
I US o L P C e
- 0 eI A U S
F 0 V
AeG QS n t
US A
F C E E T
N An s
Q Q
L l
l l
I I
- g l
L
)
NO I
T E C C U N R F A T
~
OR S T
E UN N
C I
R S O E
S I
R E
A R OS C n
T A nA e O Yt mOS s
R
. C n QE ST s i
Gea T
I I A S SO E Y n
c n E N V L R S R T l
R T I I A l T I R A U AE C a
e DL I A I R E US E E n
a t
d A R R S E P QS Y
e P o
UE B
P U
A T l S c
i QE U
S I G N t
N S
L NI c
I A E n
G U
u N
Q F
E
(
nhb" s
-[* A ~
L
8 CI N URE t
- Ii I '
e **
I i 5
R ET ENEM 2
UNNR E
GOI A C
2 IIGP N
FTNE A
R AED R
EO R U yCT T
S E S TNA G S IAN A A LRI N
AUD MT USR Y
QSO I
AO L
C A
UQ
'I
' ' i I
' s 8
L EV I
T A
R L
l l
TS E
G G
l SE YL N
N N
IC TO EN I
I NI IR FCO N
T IV LT FIS I
F MR AN AFR A
A DE UO TFE R
l
)
S G
G N
N N
N TO T
I D
O
&I NI N
R E/I N
R ET E
E DGT
&O YE T
DA N D E
I NC I
TE IR I
SE A
N NR L
A IE LT IN S
EP E
I G;
RO R
T NA IOI EERO IIU BNO IR I
P P
A EN l
NPT R
T A
S UI G
TIR I
SRM CUE PGE CLG LN PR A
CE C
E T -.
C F
EQ S
OEI LU RI VC V
L U
C N
U E
(
N D
SSS.
AEAS R
S GGGT
i EE' A
N JNR
.R ST OIW THA S
RGP CCER LMCN S
PN E
LG A
E E
UE N
SSS.
RERS S
J N R'
.R I
OIW IHA RGB CCER PN LMCN E
LG S
E E
E UE I
T N
6 I
C DAU Q
/
N E
5 D M
S l
E 0
R 1
D 8
N O
I T
l C
T U
N T
R T
A N
T N
T E
S E
S D
N L
G D
I N
O A
N N
S E
C N
I E
S T
OSSR PT A
NN TR T
II IE T UN OI CE C TSVE C - I F
IR EG E
AYRN ETR F
TR N
TE JA J
RLEI JRE A
PNUN R TU S
JART SS PM POASE P SS ONYA RABT PM S
d N
O g
I I
T G
C N
l U
I T
RT T
S T
T N
TN N
N N
N S)
E SE E
EE E A
T D
ND D
CC D T
C N
ON N
IN N R
S TE E
CE E
LA E O
I NJ T
T PT I T S
S EO F&
NN TN T UN TL N I
S DR TO D
A T
IP N
STRON _
N N
S AR TCEOO TE JE JRE JO E EP F
A E
M D
U UC A
RDI P
! I A JONI A _
I NS R
SN ORAAT S
AAE EE SA RPMRS d
H R
CG AMP B
VN C
P I A A
H
(
R D
N pI l l G
T ERO CD EEO I
R
_, EL NGW EE AD JE I TE OI GNI I N l
1_ _
RF NAA SI g I P
EMR G
B N
E I,
G G
G I1 N
N D
N D
SIR TI R&O TI
&O TRE CR E O
CR O
CEG EEGNW EENW EEA JE AOD JEOD JNN ON NRI O NRI OI A RI AYA R I YA RGM PG HBR PGBR PN N
B N
B E
E E
3l l
l l !
l I
l !
1_
F O
T Y
N T
T E
NN TG NNT IED EOS EISL LCN DIE DLOC ANE NTI NUCR UAT L
QRN 3
PEN TEDN UI EPE NHNO ESR DSG ICAC TSE NNA RS I AP II E
S U
P S
U S
l l l l
g I l
L
i e
- 1 d-f BE iig g
J lg
!3 l$l
!l Isd l8 8l-L o
.v a
v I
gg e 1$
g
~
e l
g e<
2 f**
l s=
l i n i
25 I
i cm I
i l
i 1
gg g
l
,._________._q l'
i!!
l0 ts i
INEE ll-1 I-lsil 45 i
- s.
s sg i
i gee i
I QB l
I 9
i l
I Eg I
t_______
_J I1l c___.
f!
ll$
l !l O
'~~~~
il in se li h
as i
s.
$4 Eg gl
'g Egg Os a
i
<ig l@=
i i
2/25/87 (Rev. 44) 1
.R!
'3.
Es E
,r------. llj gig *j!:j i
j h
l llle E
i 7l n u a
.in!
g 'o n e, 2-
!E i!!
W
!j!
_ !l l
~
3 V
']
Il
- y,l g
.I ll
=
kWRun ll il i
111-ll ii-h El b-----
l gg i
=
- I 7
Ill I
P is!!
fi5l1i ij
?
I,! !!I
-i!
i.
s!
2 m
Ill l
syg
,,l e
I I l
E ggg
!!!!l!..... ll ll.
ily vs a-s lll ll 5l !
l i
~
~
LL 1
3:lili l
5t
- l l
i, i!
!l.
is
=-I I
l ll i
l l
is i l l 'l I
i!!
I i
l!
T y
- i. 1
!! 1l:!!i i i
.i ii !li- !
i ia 11
!=
glli ilI i
II
' f - -- -l.--h,
-)il_;.JT T es T.
i e
3
~
~
III I l-I, i
l:l E.:
lE
! I i i i]
l "
5 a
l l l pl :
I g
t nI
' u z
g a
w t
sg y_3
{* tW 5
ll!
ll i
L.a s-g 1
11/21/86 i
j (Rev. 42) r L.
3.
DESIGN CONTROL 3.1 General The fundamental vehicle for design control involves multi-level review and/or evaluation of design documents by individuals or groups other than the original designer or designer's immediate supervisor whose authority and responsibility are identified and controlled by written procedures.
Also, procedures are established to assure that verified computer codes are certified for use and
.that their use is specified.
The design documents include, but are not limited to, system flow diagrams, design and construction speci-
)
fications, load capacity data sheets, design reports, equipment specifications, process drawings.
Design calculations are also j
subject to two or more levels of evaluation or review including that performed by the originator plus review and audit, as applicable, by Project Engineering or Station Nuclear Engineering for modifications where design work is performed by the Architect Engineer or other vendors or contractors.
Design changes are controlled through document revisions resulting from design change requests and/or design change notices and are reviewed, evaluated and, where applicable, certified in the same way as the basic design documents.
)
These design evaluations or reviews are conducted to written procedures and include consideration of quality standards, quality assurance requirements, materials suitability, process suitability, interface control and suitability of analytical or testing require-ments as appropriate.
Also, design verification, except for ASME Code items, may be achieved under a test program by qualification testing of an item under adverse design conditions.
Responsibility for overall design and design control of mechanical, electrical, structural and nuclear related systems and components and compliance of responsibilities to Section III of the ASME Code is assigned to Project Engineering during the initial design and construction and to the Station Nuclear Engineering Department after plant start-up.
Quality Assurance shall assure that design control requirements are fulfilled through review and audit.
The extent of the design review and evaluation of the original designs and modifications will be determined by the complexity of the system and any safety-related function to be performed by that system.
Design evaluations of modifications will be commensurate with those applied to the original design.
Review and evaluation by the Architect Engineer, the Nuclear Steam Supply System vendor, and/or Project Engineering or the Station Nuclear Engineering Department will assure that designs and materials will conform to the ASKE and other applicable codes, standards, regula-tory requirements, SAR commitments and appropriate quality standards, as applicable.
3-1 Rev. 32
- 32 10/05/84 Commonwealth Edison
1 Project Engineering during initial design and Station Nuclear l
Engineering Department after plant start-up will review and evaluate the overall design for safety, reliability, inspectability, maintainability and constructability.
The Assistant Vice President and
- 2 General Manager, Nuclear Stations will be responsible for review of i
designs for operability, inspectability and maintainability.
The Nuclear Fuel Services Department will be responsible for either performing reactor core design analyses or for reviewing vendor l
generated analyses.
The Nuclear Fuel Services Department is also responsible for the design specifications and design reviews for nuclear fuel and in-core components, including when actual work is delegated to other areas.
Coordination of the design review and evaluation effort by l
Project Engineering or the Station Nuclear Engineering Departmen' will I
be, in part, directed toward the identification and control of design l
l interfaces, radiation and environmental requirements, func-tions and boundaries, and selection and application of materials, parts, l
equipment appurtenances and components.
Design analysis shall be performed in a planned, controlled and documented manner.
Documentation of the design analysis shall include definition of the objective of the analysis, definition of design inputs and their sources, results of literature searches or other applicable background data, identification of assumptions and indication of those that must be verified as the design proceeds, identification of any computer calculations, including, code or program validation review and approval.
Project Engineering or the Station Nuclear Engineering Department after plant start-up, with assistance from other organi-sations, contractors or vendors, shall apply, as applicable, design review and control measures to items such as:
reactor physics; loads i
and loading combination, transient and accident analysis, compatibility l
of materials, structural support, accessibility for in-service j
inspection, maintenance and repair; and delineation of acceptance i
criteria for inspections and tests.
Project Engineering or the Station Nuclear Engineering Department after plant start-up, Architect Engineer or Nuclear Steam Supply System Supplier interpret applicable requirements, standards, guides or codes (including classification of ASME Secion Section III items) and use them as a basis for classifying structures, systems and i
components and establishing boundaries of jurisdiction in each nuclear power plant.
Evidence of design evaluation and reviews and use of alter-i native calculational methods used to assure verification or checking of i
design adequacy will be documented and retained by Project Engi-l neering and after plant start-up the Station Nuclear Engineering Department, or by the Nuclear Fuel Services Department for fuel or l
in-core related matters.
Errors and deficiencies discovered shall be 3-2 Rev. 38 10/03/85 l
l l
i Commonwealth Edison I
documented and appropriate corrective action shall be taken.
The Projects Engineering Manager prior to plant start-up, and Station Nuclear Engineering Manager after plant start-up for plant modifications, or by the Nuclear Fuel Services Department for fuel or in-core related matters for plant operations, or their respective agent or designee shall certify that a review of the Design Report / Load Capacity Data Sheets has been conducted to assure that all the Design Specification and applicable Code requirements have been considered.
Copies of the certification shall be attached to the copies of the Design Report, design drawings, stress calculations and Design and Construction Specifications and Reports which are made available, as 7
applicable, to the Inspector for review and certification and the enforcement authorities having jurisdiction over the nuclear power plant ir.stallation as provided by ASME Section III of the Codes for Classes 1, 2,
3.2 Design Changes Changes to drawings used for construction from the corresponding drawing used for stress analysis shall be certified, by the person or organization responsible for the stress analysis calculations, to have been satisfactorily reconciled with those calculations.
. Design changes are controlled through document revisions resulting from design change requests and/or design change notices and
)
are reviewed and evaluated in the same way as the basic design documents.
Site and Station design change requests will be reviewed by the Site Quality Assurance Superintendent or designee, Station Quality Assurance Engineer or Inspector, Technical Staff Supervisor, Project Engineering personnel or Station Nuclear Engineering Department 4
personnel after plant start-up for plant modifications and/or Architect Engineer, as applicable, and will be approved by Project Engineering or the Station Nuclear Engineering Department after plant start-up for plant modifications after which the approved change will be incorporated in design documents, approved, released and distributed.
The extent of the evaluation will be determined by the ccmplexity of the change and its safety-related function with respect to the original design.
Coordination of review and evaluation of design changes will be by Project Engineering or the Station Nuclear Engineering Department after plant startup for plant modifications.
The control of documents will be maintained within the system described in Quality Requirement 6.0,
" Document Control."
Plant modifications will be evaluated in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50.59 and to the requirements of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III and will be submitted to the Manager of Nuclear Safety / Superintendent of Off-Site Review and the Production Superintendent.
Also, for Code work the modification will be
- M reviewed with the Authorized Nuclear Inspector who will then stipulate the inspections he intends to make prior to implementation of the modification work.
The Production Superintendent authorizes the
- 44 modification.
The Technical Staff Supervisor reviews and approves 3-3 Rev. 44 2/25/87 Commonwealth Edison
j the proposed modification and is responsible for verifying that opo.ating procedure changes are accomplished as to station modifica-q tions.
The Station Training Supervisor is responsible that required l
training concerning plant modifications is accomplished for respon-sible plant personnel where the performance of their duties may be affected.
Quality Assurance assures such training is completed.
The Director of Nuclear Licensing reviews and the Superintendent of Off-Site Review reviews and approves proposed modifications to plant I
systems and components involving a revision to the Technical l
Specifications or a previously unreviewed safety question.
Evaluation and approval of the substitution of equipment is performed by the Technical Staff Supervisor and either the Production Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent Operating or Assistant Superintendent Maintenance.
The Station Nuclear Engineering Department or equipment vendor provide engineering analysis as required by the design specification.
The Station Nuclear Engineering Department assigns an organ-ization to verify installation of modifications in accordance with design and quality assurance requirements.
When modifications cannot be completed in accordance with drawings and specifications, a review for disposition will be requested of the Station Nuclear Engineering. Department.
The verifying or checking of design features and modifications is done by qualified individuals or' l
organization other than those who prepare the original design or design modification but who may be from the same organization.
l The assigned installation department furnishes Project l
Engineering and, after plant start-up for modifications, the Station l
Nuclear Engineering Department as-built information to review as to correctness and to issue as-built drawings.
- 42 Test data required by project Engineering involving initial' construction and by the Station Nuclear Engineering Department involving modifications to verify the satisfactory installation of components is obtained by organizations designated by them.
After completion of construction, station operating personnel and Quality Control personnel verify the satisfactory final testing of systems required by Project Engineering or the Station Nuclear Engineering Department.
Also, where applicable, before the component or appurtenance is placed in service, copies of the appropriate ASME Data Reports and Certified Design and Construc-tion Reports and Design and Construction Specifications are filed at the location of the installation and made available to the Authorized Nuclear Inspector and the State of Illinois enforcement authorities having jurisdiction.
Completed Data Report Form N-3, however, shall be filed by CECO with such enforcement authority having jurisdiction.
3-4 Rev. 42 11/21/86 Commonwealth Edison
incorporate, by reference, those documents such as specifications, drawings, proposals, supplementary proposals, etc., and any conditions of award which form the basis for the evaluation and award.
Edison Purchasing, based on the recommendation letter, its own evaluation and the purchase requisition, shall conduct necessary 4
negotiations and clarifications and make the award to the successful
- 42 bidder.
Any changes evolving from the procurement activities j
involving technical or quality assurance matters, either for the original purchase or subsequent change orders, shall be approved by the originator of the purchase or change order requisition.
l The Projects Engineering Manager or the Station Nuclear Engineering Manager after plant start-up will assign authority for
]
evaluation of the vendor quality assurance program, prior to final award of the contract or purchase order, to the responsible Project Engineer who will request such evaluation be undertaken by the Director of Quality Assurance (Engineering-Construction).
Quality Assurance shall evaluate and approve all such vendor quality assurance programs.
The Quality Assurance Coordinator. assigned to the Station Nuclear Engineering and Project Engineering Departments is responsible for assuring that the evaluation is carried out and for auditing the manuals of bidders being recommended as acceptable for award as to resolution of comments received by Engineering from Quality Assurance and others plus evaluation by Engineering.
As part of the vendor quality assurance program evaluation, the Quality Assurance Coordinator will assure all vendor quality assurance program deficiencies are resolved.
Concurrence by Quality Assurance shall be required.
If the vendor program deficiencies are minor and/or may be corrected by specific procedures for the work to be done, the resolution may follow an award and shall be a condition of the award.
For procurement performed at certain construction sites by the Purchasing Department satellite organization involving safety-and Code-related items, the preparation of the necessary procurement documents is the responsibility of Project Construction.
Procurement by the site Purchasing organization are under the control and management of the General Office Purchasing Department and associated procurement documer.tation packages are formulated from specifications and drawings issued and approved by Engineering.
The cognizant Field Engineer, or, as applicable, the Project Field Engineering Manager, prepares the suggested list of prospective bidders for each procurement package from the Quality Approved Bidders' List with direction from the site Purchasing
+42 Department Buyers.
The final list of prospective bidders and procurement bid package is approved by the Project Construction Superintendent or Construction Superintendent or designee, or, as applicable, the Project Field Engineering Manager, or their designated alternate.
In addition, such procurement bid packages involving the purchase of ASME Code and 4-3 Rev. 42 11/21/86 Commonwealth Edison
b
~
i safety-related materials and items are required to be reviewed and approved by the Site Quality Assurance Superintendent, or designated alternate, verifying that the necessary technical and Quality Assurance requirements are included and the proposed bidders are acceptable.
The bids are evaluated by Project Construction and an award recommendation plus a purchase requisition is prepared and trans-mitted to Purchasing via the Site Quality Assurance Superintendent, or designated alternate for final review and approval indication.
Site Purchasing, based on the recommendation of Project Construction, its own evaluation and the purchase requisition conduct necessary i
negotiations and clarifications and make the award to a bidder on the Quality Approved Bidders' List.
Any changes evolvirg from the
- 42 procurement activities involving technical or quality assurance matters, either for the original purchase or subsequent change orders, shall be approved by the originator of the purchase or change order requisitions as well as Quality Assurance.
The Vice President (Fuel & Budgets) is responsible for the preparation of nuclear fuel bid documents, for the evaluation of
)
bids received and for the purchase of nuclear fuel.
The Nuclear Fuel Fabrication Inspector provides quality assurance assistance.
The Nuclear Fuel Services Manager, and others as necessary, furnish technical assistance to the Nuclear Fuel Agent during the j
preparation of bid documents and the evaluation of bids.
When the Assistant Superintendent Maintenance or Technical Staff Supervisor orders spare parts, material and equipa.ent for safety-related items, components and modules to applicable engineering and quality assurance requirements, they specify the quality assurance documentation requirements equivalent to or better than the original installation.
When spare parts, material and j
equipment are ordered by part number or nomenclature without special
)
engineering requirements being specified, appropriate statements are included in the purchase order to assure they are at
)
least equivalent to the original equipment.
The Quality Control j
Supervisor shall review and verify that quality assurance, i
specification, ASME Code and other applicable codes and standards requirements and special requirements are included in the Request for Purchase.
j l
The procurement documents are reviewed and processed by the I
Production Stores Group.
Coded part numbers are assigned to spare parts.
The Production Stores Staff and the Manager of Quality Assurance, or their designees, review and approve that the quality assurance requirements for documentation of spare parts, welding materials, material and equipment as outlined above are included in the procurement request documents and that the items are ordered from the original equipment supplier or an evaluated and approved alternate supplier.
4-4 Rev. 42 11/21/86 Commonwealth Edison i
L J
\\
l l
7.
CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES i
7.1 General The control of the quality of purchased material, equipment and services is achieved through the evaluation of vendors, surveil-lance of their operations and required source inspection, documenta-tion, receiving inspection and retention of quality records.
Both Edison and the NSSS Supplier have direct procurement functions for the Station.
The Architect Engineer. offers recommendations to Edison on vendor selection and reviews vendor efforts as directed by Edison.
Edison will inspect and audit the NSSS Supplier's control of purchased material, equipment and services.
Edicon has the respon-sibility for on-site control of Edison and the NSSS Supplier purchased material, equipment and services.
Contractors and suppliers furnishing material, equipme!.;
and services to CECO for items within the jurisdiction of this Quality Assurance Program will be selected on the basis of demon-strated capability to provide a product, process or service in accordance with the design specifications and contract prov.isions.
The purpose of this Section is to define the quality system elements and related policies which assure the quality of purchased material, equipment and services through the evaluation of vendors, surveillance of their operations, required source inspection, docu-mentation, receiving inspection and retention of quality records.
As applicable, the cognizant Project Engineering Project Engineer or the Station Nuclear Engineering Department Project Engineer in conjunction with Quality Assurance will require a Quality Assurance Program in accordance with ANSI N45.2 or ASME Boiler and Pressure Code Section III from vendors or contractors consistent with the importance of the procurement to. station safety and operation and the requirements of ASME Section III and 10CFR50 Appendix B.
For ASME Code and safety-related procurement, the applicable vendor's Quality Assurance Program shall be identified in the procurement documents and shall require certification to their QA Program accepted by CECO and identification of the QA Program revision and date to which the work was performed or item supplied.
- 42 In addition, Edison's procurement documents will provide notification to vendors and contractors that the provisions of 10CFR Part 21 apply.
7-1 Rev. 42 11/21/86 Commonwealth Edison
T Control and approval of subcontractors quality assurance programs, procedures and personnel qualification,,are the responsi-bility of the specific contractor involved.
Such contractor actions are to be documented and will be subject to audit by CECO.
An evaluation of vendor capability will be required for ASME Section III and safety-related items.
Where valid records of vendor capability and quality performance are not available to CECO, a survey of the supplier's facilities, capabilities and quality assurance system will be made by CECO or its designated represent-ative.
For items requiring ASME Code conformance, vendors must be able to meet ASME Code requirements.
Where material manufacturers or suppliers are qualified by CECO by survey, as provided under ASME Section III, and materials or items are procured directly from such qualified manufacturers or suppliers by another Certificate Holder on the basis of such survey, the qualification documentation shall be provided to the other Certificate Holder prior to its use of the materials or items.
The Project Engineering and the Station Nuclear Engineering Department Qaulity Assurance Coordinator will be responsible for assuring that vendar or contractor Quality Assurance Program evaluations are carried out.
The Guality Assurance Department, for the Purchasing Department, prepares and maintains the computerized Quality Approved Bidders' List (QABL) for contractors and suppliers of ASME, safety and
)
regulatory related items.
The Purchasing Department maintains the
- 42 commercial Approved Bidders List.
Addition of vendors to the Quality Approved Bidders List shall only be made upon approval by Station Nuclear Engineering Manager and the Manager of Quality Assurance, or their designeees, as to meeting technical and quality assurance i
requirements.
For vendors or contractors to be placed on the Company l
Quality Approved Bidders' List on the basis of having an approved
- 42
)
Quality Assurance Program for ASME, safety or regulatory related items or work, a controlled copy of their approved Quality Assurance Program shall be assigned to the CECO Manager of Quality Assurance.
Section 9.0 of this report, " Control of Special Processes,"
establishes the evaluation and assessment of certain process and inspection capabilities of the vendor such as welding, heat treatment, and nondestructive examination.
l 7.2 Evaluation of Vendors l
Past performance of a contractor / vendor will be considered during procurement activities by CECO.
Prior to contract or purchase order award, the bidder's capability and quality performance will be reviewed relative to the product, process, or service being procured.
l For suppliers of ASME services or items and for Material Suppliers or Manufacturers who do not have a Quality System Certificate (Materials) l or an ASME Certificate of Authorization with an appropriate scope a survey of the bidder's facilities prior to award may be required.
Such
- 42 review will verify ASME Code compliance as applicable.
7-2 Rev. 42 11/21/86 CommonweaHh Edison
i l
~
1 1
u The start-up testing program commences at fuel loading and l
proceeds through several power level plateaus through 100%
power.
The Projects Engineering Manager or the Station Nuclear Engineering Manager of their designee (s) approves the start-up test procedures and data.
Start-up testing of systems is assigned to Technical Staff Engineers. They assure that the construction and preoperational tests are complete and that the start-up i
test procedures incorporate the requirements and acceptance criteria contained in the applicable design documents. The j
start-up prccedures review assures the prerequisites have j
been met, adequate test instrumentation is available for i
use and the tests will be performed under suitable conditions.
After start-up test results are evaluated and accepted by l
the cognizant Projects Engineering Manager or the Station Nuclear Engineering Manager or their designee (s), an j
acceptance statement is issued by that Manager or designee.
i The Site Quality Assurance Superintendent or designee assures that start-up test requirements are fulfilled.
The Production Superintendent indicates. concurrence and satisfactory completion of start-up tests.
4 1
Modification testing requirements are specified by the cognizant Commonwealth Edison Company engineering. department and/or Technical Staff personnel and reviewed and accepted by Station Quality Control. Results from the tests are reviewed 1
and approved by the Technical Staff Supervisor and by the Assistant Superintendent Operating, or designee.
Test results which do not agree with requirements shall be forwarded to the Station Nuclear Engineering Department for acceptance.
Required testing before equipment is retutned to service is defined in the instrument and equipment maintenance work procedures. The acceptance of functional tests is assigned by the Assistant Superintendent Operating to the station operation or Technical Staff personnel. The Assistant Superintendent Maintenance or Quality Control Supervisor review and accept the maintenance records for completeness. The Station Quality Assurance Superintendent assures that all testing and documentation requirements are fulfilled.
11-3 Rev. 44 2/25/87 Commonwealth Edison
1 Tests during operations other than routine surveillance tests are performed and documented as prescribed by the Technical l
Staff and Assistant Superintendent Operating to verify continued
- 39 satisfactory performance of safety-related structures, systems and components.
The test results are evaluated by the Technical Staff and station quality control personnel.
Written test procedures will be developed to demonstrate design and performance characteristics as specified in design and operating requirements. The procedures will include provisions for hold points to be established and for assuring that prerequisites have been completed and state the data to be obtained and requirements and acceptance limits to be fulfilled. Specifically, the Authorized Nuclear Inspector shall have the opportunity to establish his hold points prior to the approval of the test procedures written for the tests required by the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III or XI. The tests will be performed under the appropriate conditions using adequate, appropriate, approved and calibrated test equipment.
Data will be examined frequently as each test proceeds, and out-of-tolerance conditions will be recorded and described in adequate detail to permit post-test analysis.
Test results will be evaluated following each test to assure conformance with design and performance requirements. The evaluation will determine the following:
1.
That the appropriate test procedure was used.
2.
That the data displays the adequacy of the equipment to meet the specified requirements.
3.
That nonconforming or incident conditions, if applicable, are reported and corrected.
Test records will include data sheets completed during the tests and a list of thos' instruments used for calibrating equipment. The data shee s will have provisions for identifying the person responsible for c nducting the test and the date or period when the test was performed.
The orig.'.nal test records shall be reviewed for completeness, identified, and indexed to establish them as a part of a permanent record,to be retained.
1 2
1 1
)
11-4 l
Rev. 39 11/02/85 Commonwealth Edison I
j
l
- 18. AUDITS Audits will be performed by Commonwealth Edison Company and/or its contractors, subcontractors and vendors to verify the implementation and effectiveness of quality programs under their i
cognizance.
The number and experience of persons participating in audits will vary according to the nature and significance of the audit.
Audits under the responsibility of the Manager of Quality Assurance will cover quality systems for engineering, construction, modifications, maintenance, in-service inspection and Stores activ-ities.
Audits will be performed to evaluate the implementation of the quality assurance programs and the adherence to procedures and controls and the fulfillment of requirements.
Certifications and
)
records will also be evaluated.
Product audits assess the i
effectiveness of in-progress work,. inspections and tests that are specific to the fabrication, installation, construction, testing i
and operation of an item.
l The performance and compliance of each operating station to the Quality Assurance Program is assured through review surveil-
)
lance and audit of operations by the Quality Assurance Engineer or Inspector under the direction of the Station Quality Assurance Superintendent who is responsible for operating quality assurance to the Director of Quality Assurance (Operating) and through review, surveillance and audit of maintenance, modifications, Stores and in-service inapection activities by Quality Assurance Engineers or Inspectors (Maintenance) under the direction of the Station Quality Assurance Superintendent who is responsible for such quality assurance activities to the Director of Quality Assurance (Maintenance).
Audits are performed to audit schedules
- 35 which are approved by the Manager of Quality Assurance.
This schedule includes the minimum audits required.
Other audits will be performed as directed by Quality Assurance Supervision.
The Lead Auditor's auditing organization shall develop and document an audit plan for each audit.
This plan shall identify the audit scope, requirements, audit personnel, activities to be audited, organizations to be notified, applicable documents, schedule, and written procedures or checklists.
Audits will be conducted using checklists or an agenda approved by responsible Quality Assurance Department personnel and will be conducted with sufficient authority and organizational freedom to evaluate compliance with all applicable aspects of the Quality Assurance Program and specified requirements.
Audits will be initiated early to assure effective quality assurance during design, 18-1 Rev. 35 Commokd[a$b Edison
4 procurement, manufacturing, construction and install'ation, inspection and test and be performed efficiently in order to achieve a minimum of interference with work in progress and minimum disruption of organizations being audited. An audit plan will be maintained in order to schedule audits of site contractors.
Audits of off-site contractors generally will be conducted in conjunction with plant visits for witnessing inspection points by a qualified auditor.
Also, periodically Quality Assurance will participate in j
such audits or perform independent audits to assure effectiveness of
]
the program, compliance to the program and fulfillment of j
procurement requirements.
The elements in the quality program, in procurement docu-ments and in related codes and standards, are subject to systems audits.
Also, items received, fabricated and constructed or
)
installed for use by Commonwealth Edison Company in its nuclear j
power plants are subject to audits.
l Audits will be performed selectively at various stages of I
contracts on a varying frequency, based on the nature and safety significance of the work being done to verify compliance and determine the effectiveness of procedures, inspections, tests, process controls and documentation.
For Code materials, when a Material Manufacturer or Material Supplier, as applicable, does not hold a Quality System Certificate (Materials), the CECO audit j
l frequency shall be at least once annually during the interval in which CECO purchased material is being controlled by the Material Manufacturer or Material Supplier.
In addition to these audits, Quality Assurance will conduct approximately annually, overall I
system audits of the NSSS vendor, the Architect Engineer, site contractors, vendors of services, and involved Edison Departments.
Audits of CECO are also performed by the Authorized Inspection Agency as required by the ANSI N-626 series of Standards.
For operating stations, periodic Quality Assurance Depart-ment audits will be performed to verify compliance with, and the effectiveness of the program.
Audits covering operating will be performed in accordance with the Technical Specifications under the direction and responsibility of the Director of Quality Assurance (Operating) independent of the production Department.
Surveillance,
- 35 review and audits covering maintenance, modifications, in-service inspection and Stores activities will be performed under the direction and responsibility of the Director of Quality Assurance (Maintenance).
Audit results and recommendations of corrective
- 35 l
action will be documented and reviewed with the management of the l
Station.
Deficiencies requiring prompt corrective action are l
reported immediately to management of the audited organization.
Verification of the completion of corrective action recommended in audit reports will be performed by the Technical Staff Supervisor or Quality Control Supervisor.
Follow-up of open station items is tracked by the Action Item Records (AIR) System.
Where an audit item is placed under the AIR system for tracking completion, approval as to satisfactory completion of corrective action shall be obtained from the responsible station Quality Assurance Engineer or Inspector.
18-2 Rev. 35 6/05/85 Commonwealth Edison