IR 05000315/1978029

IE Inspec Repts 50-315/78-29 & 50-316/78-27 on 780925-29 During Which 4 Items of Noncompliance Were Noted:Security Organization,Communications Control,Detection Aids & Testing & Maintenance

ML20150D760
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	10/20/1978
From:	Creed J, Hind J, Madeda T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20150D751	List: IR 05000315/1978029 ML20150D748
References
50-315-78-29, 50-316-78-27, NUDOCS 7812060391
Download: ML20150D760 (2)

Text

,

r I

(

U.S. 'AUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECT,10N AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION III

Report No. 50-315/78-29, 50-316/78-27 Dockat No. 50-315, 50-316 ? s3 License No. DPR-58 DPR-74 Licensee: American Electric Power Service Corporation i

'

Indiana and Michigan Power Company 2 Broadway New York, NY 10004 Facility Name: Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2

Inspection At

D. C. Cook Site, Bridgman, MI Inspection Conducted: September 25-29, 1978 M /0 o Inspectors: . R. Creed (Date)

% b /&f$

T. J.4tpdeda /C - 2 0 - 7 f

"

(Date)

Approved by: .

.A ind, Chief / !O [

Safeguards Branch '(Date)

Inspection Summary Inspection on September 25-29, 1978 (Report No. 50-315/78-29; 50-316/

78-27) Areas Inspected: Unannounced inspection, begun off-shift, regarding (a) action taken to correct previous inspection findings; (b) applicable procedural aspects of 10 CFR 73 55, which became effective May 25, 1977, specifically, the insp,stors reviewed areas relative to the physical security plan, securif 9 organization, physical barriers, access controls, testing and maintenute of security related equipment, communications controls, response et utrols records, and detection aids; (c) the approved security plan ;hich was submitted in 1 accordance with 10 CFR 50.34(c) and required implementing procedures; (d) procurement and construction activities relative to full implementa-tion of 10 CFR 73.55. The inspection involved 80 inspection hours by two NRC inspector ('

__ . - . . . - . - - . -. .- . - - . . - - . - . . - - . -

... .y

.

?

.

Results : Of the nine areas specifically inspected, 4 apparent items of noncompliance were identified in 4 areas (Security Organization -

paragraph 3; Communication Contrdis paragraph 4; Detection Aids -  ;

paragraph 5; Testing and Maintenance - paragraph 6; and three items are i considered infractions and one item is considered a deficiency. The previously identified inspection finding was corrected and is considered close l

-'

.' .

/

,

l l

l l

.