IR 05000315/1998011
| ML20248D005 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 06/02/1998 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20248C979 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-315-98-11, 50-316-98-11, NUDOCS 9806020298 | |
| Download: ML20248D005 (2) | |
Text
,
t
.
\\
l U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION lll Docket Nos:
50-315;50-316 License Nos:
50-315/98011(DRS); 50-316/98011(DRS)
Licensee:
Indiana Michigan Power Company Facility:
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 l
Location:
1 Cook Place Bridgman, MI 49106 Dates:
May 4-8,1998 Inspector:
James L. Belanger, Senior Physical Security inspector Approved by:
James R. Creed, Chief, Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety
{g S
N
-
-,
9806020298 980522 PDR ADOCK 05000315 G
'
\\
.
.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 NRC Inspection Reports 50-315/98011; 50-316/98011 This routine, announced inspection included a review of the physical security program, an j
aspect of Plant Support. The specific areas of the physical security program reviewed were l
Security Program Plans and Security Program Procedures, Security Organization and Administration, and Quality Assurance in Security This was an announced inspection conducted by one regional inspector. The following observations were made:
l The approved security plan did not provide a description of the duties and e
responsibilities / delegation of authority of the security management oversight position of the Security and Emergency Operations Manager established in November 1997. This matter is considered an Inspection Follow Up Item (IFI). (Section S3)
in general, the conduct of security operations was professional with marked e
>
improvement in the level of management support for the physical security program.
This was evidenced by an increase in the management oversight of the program, increase staffing in security operations and training areas, and improvement in the staff communications and the initiation of employee incentives. Security force performance i
was effective. (Section S6.1)
Management's corrective actions were not totally effective in addressing the loss of e
temporary lighting which caused the licensee to go below the required.2 foot candles on four occasiens subsequent to the last security inspection. This matter is considered an Inspection Follow Up item (IFI). (Section S6.2)
Self-assessments conducted by the Plant Protection Department were effective in e
determining procedural compliance but lacked the depth and scope to determine overall program effectiveness. (Section S7)
The licensee identified that access control to a vital area was lost for approximately two e
and a half hours on October 9,1997, because a portion of the physical boundary was removed without establishing compensatory measures. (Section S8.1)
......,.. s.,.y., y m.,, __